3
Benefits of Concrete Filled Steel Tubes (CFT's) Top Exceptional strength-to-weight ratio Less strength degradation than reinforced concrete sections More damping of the structural response than steel Steel tube provides natural formwork for pouring concrete Rectangular CFT's can handle biaxial bending better than steel or reinforced concrete More resistant to fire than steel sections Applications of Composite CFT Structural Systems Top Three-dimensional static advanced analysis for non-seismic design o Proportion frame to achieve factored loads without reaching limit point o Alleviates need to use AISC LRFD interaction equation Three-dimensional static "push-over" analysis for seismic design Three-dimensional nonlinear dynamic analysis for seismic behavioral evaluation Research Objectives Top Synopsis - To collect and summarize experimental and computational research worldwide on CFT's and highlight areas where more research is warranted Finite Element Formulations - To develop two finite element formulations, including a concentrated plasticity "macro" model and a distributed plasticity "fiber" model, to simulate the behavior of rectangular CFT beam-columns subjected to monotonic static loading, cyclic static loading, or transient dynamic loading Performance Based Design - To develop reliability-based performance-based design guidelines for rectangular CFT (RCFT) structures Behavioral Characteristics of RCFT's Top The axial force and flexural behavior of RCFT's are summarized in the following figures:

Benefits of Concrete Filled Steel Tubes

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

• Exceptional strength-to-weight ratio

Citation preview

Benefits of Concrete Filled Steel Tubes (CFT's)Top

Exceptional strength-to-weight ratio Less strength degradation than reinforced concrete sections More damping of the structural response than steel Steel tube provides natural formwork for pouring concrete Rectangular CFT's can handle biaxial bending better than steel or reinforced concrete More resistant to fire than steel sections

Applications of Composite CFT Structural SystemsTop

Three-dimensional static advanced analysis for non-seismic design Proportion frame to achieve factored loads without reaching limit point Alleviates need to use AISC LRFD interaction equation Three-dimensional static "push-over" analysis for seismic design Three-dimensional nonlinear dynamic analysis for seismic behavioral evaluation

Research ObjectivesTop

Synopsis - To collect and summarize experimental and computational research worldwide on CFT's and highlight areas where more research is warranted Finite Element Formulations - To develop two finite element formulations, including a concentrated plasticity "macro" model and a distributed plasticity "fiber" model, to simulate the behavior of rectangular CFT beam-columns subjected to monotonic static loading, cyclic static loading, or transient dynamic loading Performance Based Design - To develop reliability-based performance-based design guidelines for rectangular CFT (RCFT) structures

Behavioral Characteristics of RCFT'sTop

The axial force and flexural behavior of RCFT's are summarized in the following figures:Failure Modes for CFT ColumnsFailure Modes for CFT Beams

Typical Monotonic Load-Deformation BehaviorResulting Normalized Cross Section Strength of CFT's

Key Features of Cyclic CFT Behavior Vanishing elastic region Bauschinger effect Gradual softening Strength degradation Cyclic hardening Cyclic softening Bounding stiffness

Typical Cyclic CFT BehaviorResulting Concentrated Plasticity Bounding-Surface Formulation