Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF HAW API
In the Matter of the Application of ))
HAWAII ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY, INC. ) Docket No. 2017-0122
For Approval of a Power Purchase Agreement for Renewable Dispatchable Firm Energy and Capacity.
LIFE OF THE LAND'S
TESTIMONY LOL-T-1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
HENRY CURTISVICE PRESIDENT FOR CONSUMER ISSUES LIFE OF THE LAND P.O. Box 37158 Honolulu, HI 96837-0158 (808) 927-0709
KAT BRADYVICE PRESIDENT FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE LIFE OF THE LAND P.O. Box 37158 Honolulu, HI 96837-0158 (808) 927-0709
LIFE OF THE LAND'S
TESTIMONY LOL-T-1
1
2 My name is Henry Q Curtis. I am the Vice President for Consumer Issues of Life of the
3 Land, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation and a participant in the above captioned case.
4 I have come full circle—from an intense interest in biological systems to heavy
5 involvement in bioenergy systems and their impacts.
6 I grew up around nature. My ninth grade biology teacher ignited my interest in biology.
7 While in High School, I took a National Science Foundation summer course in Molecular and
8 Cellular Biology of Plants. I studied economics in college. In grad school I again became
9 interested in agrculture - how weather and soils impact agricultural futures. While my graduate
10 work was in economics, I took a painful course in historiography - determining the reliability of
11 historical documents by examining and questioning their footnotes and bibliographies. While
12 toying with the idea of finishing my masters thesis, I moved to California, and became involved
13 in door-to-door work around pesticides, both in urban areas and in the Central Valley. I
14 continued my research on agriculture and relied heavily of the libraries at Stanford, and the
15 University of California system (Davis, Berkeley, Santa Cruz, Santa Barbara, UCLA).
16 The Central Valley was a desert that became the major fruit and vegetable region of the
17 U.S. through massive pipes bringing in water from the mountains and the Colorado River. But
18 there was a problem. Matching the water demand to the supply meant that water would sink
19 when sprayed and come back up with salts. The water would go into the plants and/or be
20 evaporated while the salts would kill the plants. Therefore, excessive water had to be sprayed.
21 But there is an impervious clay layer under much of the Central Valley. Simply adding water
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 2
22 meant the water table would gradually rise, and eventually, drown the plants. So, a saparate
23 underground piping system was needed to take away the salt-filled water. Unfortunately, the
24 extnsive piping system was never finished, resulting in a massive bird and fish kill at the
25 Kesterson Reservoir due to the build-up of selenium salts.
26 I came to Hawai i in 1991 and became involved with Life of the Land in 1994, one of
27 three organizations that had won a multi-million lawsuit over the heptachlor scandal.
28 Furthermore, Life of the Land was an organization involved with the pesticide issue. There were
29 many in the 1960s and early 1970s who felt that Hawai'i had unique volcanic soils, so pesticides
30 would never reach the groundwater. That was a mistaken idea.
31 I seved nine years as Community Co-Chair of the Hickam Air Force Restoration
32 Advisory Board, and served on similar boards for Pearl Harbor and Schofield Barracks. I took
33 risk workshops sponsored by the Navy, Air Force, and the Hawai'i Department of Health. The
34 military advisory boards monitored the identification of contamination, the analysis of alternative
35 remediation methods, and whether the sites were, in fact, cleaned up. During muy time on the
36 Hickam RAB, the two non-Red Hill Fuel Storage Annexes (Waipio and Wahiawa) and the
37 pipeline to Hickam Air Force Base were cleaned out.
38 I became involved in energy related contested case proceedings in 1996, primarily before
39 the Hawai'i Public Utilities Commission. Ten or more of the 50 proceedings that I have been
40 involved in, on behalf of Life of the Land, dealt primarily with bioenergy.
41 In the first bioenergy proceeding, Hawaiian Electric Company proposed using ethanol as
42 a fuel. They then switched to palm oil biodiesel imported from Indonesia and Borneo. A Wall
43 Street Journal lead story reported on the in-depth analysis to the enormous negative
44 environmental, cultural, and health impacts caused by burning down tropical rainforests and
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 3
45 replacing the forests with monocropped palm oil plantations.^ Life of the Land intervened and
46 the Commission rejected the proposal.
47 Another boondoggle bioenergy proposal was to microwave crops into biodesel on
48 Hawai'i Island, and to have O'ahu ratepayers pay over $500 million in subsidies. The Public
49 Utilities Commission ultimately rejected the proposed contract.^
50 In 2008-09 I was a videographer, editor, director, and producer for 'Olelo. I then started
51 ililani media, a digital media site not affiliated with Life of the Land. I tried being advocacy
52 neutral, although I occasionally wrote columns with slants or biases, although I didn't always
53 agree with those positions. I reiterate, some of my stories promote ideas I disagree with. My
54 focus is on education not persuasion and not advocacy for rigid positions.
55 Over the past eight years I have written more than two thousand digital media articles of
56 science (agriculture, pesticides, genertic enginnering, toxics, energy, cybersecurity, climate
57 change, and telecommunications) and politics in Hawai'i. I have covered a number of
58 agricultural conferennces.
59 One of the first conference I attended as ililani media was the 2010 State Agricultural
60 Conference at the Ihilani Resort. The keynote speaker was Timothy LaSalle. LaSalle’s doctoral
^ Wall Street Journal: As Alternative Energy Heats Up, Environmental Concerns Grow. Crop of Renewable 'Biofuels' Could Have Drawbacks; Eires Across Indonesia, Dec. 5, 2006, Page A1 http://online.wsj.eom/article/SB116501541088338547.html^ “At least two members of the public have attempted to estimate the total amount of the proposed biofuel subsidy based on electricity sales for the calendar year 2 010. See electronic mail comment from Mr. Henry Curtis, Executive Director, Life of the Land, dated August 1,2011, at 7-8 (based on the electric sales of HECO and HELCO for the calendar year 2010, the total amount of the subsidy would be $26,553 million per year); and electronic mail comment from Mr. Roger Dunn, dated July 31, 2011, at 1 (based on HECO's electricity sales for 2010, the proposed biofuels tax would raise $26 million per year to subsidize sixteen million gallons of biodiesel).” Decision and Order dated Sept. 29, 2011, fn 64 at 53, docket no. 2011-0005, re HECO, MECO, HELCO- Aina Koa Pono-Ka'u LLC 20-yem' Biodiesel Supply Contract.
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 4
61 thesis focused on resistant to change. “As humans we get caught in our own paradigms. We get
62 caught in a political view, we get caught in a religious view, we get caught but more importantly,
63 in a world view. And our culture and education bring us up in this world view. [] I had to
64 challenge my own self.” “Tropicana Orange Juice, when it said we got to figure out what our
65 carbon footprint is, they assumed it would be refrigeration or packaging or transport -- and when
66 they did the analysis it was farm nitrogen fertilizer -- it was number one by far.” LaSalle noted
67 noted environmentalists didn't like his analysis since it implied that we could continue to bum
68 fossil fuel as long as we aggrssively store carbon in the soil. “The soils capacity to hold carbon is
69 so large ... we should be paid to do it.” Ranchers have the opportunity to actually fix the global
70 problem. Soil. Dirt. “If you accept a limiting belief, then it will become a truth for you.”
71 —Louise Hay.
72 Tmth is an odd thing. Basic economic theory asserts that there is an inverse relationship
73 between price and demand. Lower the price and demand goes up. Reducing the price of anything
74 through lower profits, changing technology, or gains in efficiency will increase demand. The
75 great 19th century economist Jevons found that a more efficient coal-powered steam engine
76 decreased the amount of coal per unit produced which increased the demand for coal. The Jevons
77 Effect has been known for 150 years. Install solar on your roof, buy an electric car, saving
78 thousands of dollars, buy more things, take a family vacation to China, the footprint for the car
79 and house may decrease, but in all likelihood, the total emissions will rise. Are energy efficieny
80 goals an economic development tool or a way to reduce emissions? Energy efficieny proponents
81 often avoid thinking about the issue. The lesson to be learned is that it is dangerous not to think
82 through a concept. “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends
83 upon his not understanding it” -- Upton Sinclair.
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 5
84 Inefficieny is not necessarily bad. The efficiency of a traditional light bulb is well below
85 1%.^ The efficiency of life, that is, of solar energy being converted into the energy in living
86 things on the planet is less than 0.1%.'^
87 I constantly seek to challenge my own conceptions, values, and beliefs. We can't solve
88 anything -- especially the climate crisis -- by misunderstanding the facts, the models, the
89 analysis, and the solutions. Many people work for entities that can't tolerate critique. Often a
90 project sounds good, but the danger is overlooking the chance that something is terribly wrong. I
91 start by challenging my own views. “My number one rule is hope for the best, plan for the
92 worst.” CIA Director Ezra Kramer, Hunt for Red October.^
93 I get to bounce ideas off my partner Kat Brady, a passionate researcher who has spent the
94 past 19 years on the University of Hawai'i Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). “The primary
95 goal of the UH IRBs is to protect the rights and welfare of individuals recruited to participate in
96 research activities conducted under the auspices of the University of HawaiT.”^ Kat Brady and
97 Lynette Cruz played a crucial role in getting Cultural Impact Statements to be part of the
98 Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") process. Brady reviews EIS Social Impact Assessments
99 for Life of the Land.
100 What do we know? How do we know it? How reliable is it? What could go wrong? What
101 are the assumptions? Are the facts really facts? Is my biases hiding some of the benefits and/or
^ A back of the envelope calculation: half the petroleum can't be removed from an oil well, 20% of extracted petroleum is lost in the refinery process, two-thirds of the fuel oil in an electric generator is lost as heat, 5% of the electricity is lost in transmission and distribution, the old-kind lightbulb converts 93% of the electricity to heat and 7% to light
Ratio of Net Primary Production to Global Potential of Solar Energy ^ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0440963/quotes ^ https://researchcompliance.hawaii.edu/programs/human-studies/
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 6
102 risks from my perceptions? "Challenge your preconceptions or they'll challenge you." -- Vulcan
103 scientist Velik^.
104 I filmed a State Legislative hearing held in Hilo in 2008 regarding the DLNR proposal to
105 force agricultural leesees of state lands to share their lease with biofuel companies. It was out of
106 this process that Hu Honua was bom.
107 "Our house is still on fire. Your inaction is fueling the flames by the hour. We are
108 still telling you to panic, and to act as if you loved your children above all else. ” — Greta at
109 Davos
110 Hu Honua proposed their tree-burning generation facility in 2008. They sought an
111 exemption from competitive bidding as that would slow down the process. The Hawai'i Electric
112 Light Company (“HELCO”) filed their power purchase agreement with Hu Honua to the Public
113 Utilities Commission in 2012. Life of the Land intervened in the proceedings. After the plan fell
114 apart, Hu Honua and HELCO went to court. A new proposal was submitted to the Public
115 Utilities Commission in 2017. Once again, Life of the Land was a participant in the proceedings.
116 We appealed the final decision and the Hawai'i Supreme Court upheld our appeal and remanded
117 the proceeding back to the Public Utilities Commission.
118 The Hawai'i Supreme Court mled in 2017 that the state constitutional right to a clean and
119 healthful environment gives citizens the right to be heard and protect their environmental
120 interests in cases before the state Public Utilities Commission.^ The Hawai'i Supreme Court
121 mled in 2019 -- in our appeal -- that the Commission must address climate change in all
^ Enterprise (2001) https://www.quotes.net/mquote/^ In re Application of Maui Electric Co., Limited (2017) https://law.justia.eom/cases/hawaii/supreme-court/2017/scwc-15-0000640.html
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 7
122 applications.^ The “clean and healthful environment” constitutional clause was recommended by
123 the 1978 Hawai'i Constitutional Convention and adopted by the voters in the November 1978
124 election. The Committee reports mention the environment but did not mention greenhouse gas,
125 climate change, or global warming. Then it was applicable to environmental issues. Today it is
126 applicable to both climate and non-climate related environmental impacts.
127 Agriculture involves a very complex set of dynamic interactions between air, land,
128 vegetation, and soil. The majority of the carbon in the air-vegetation-soil system is found in the
129 soil. There were anecdotal accounts that when sugar operations ceased on O'ahu's north shore,
130 when irrigation and evaporation changed, then rainfall patterns changed. Military representatives
131 informed the Pearl Harbor Restoration Advisory Board members that non-point source pollution
132 coming off the base and flowing into the ocean was actually coming onto the base from mauka
133 regions. Agriculture and open space are open systems with articifical boundaries that nature
134 doesn't always honor.
135 We all know that Hawai'i is unique. It can be pouring in one valley and sunny in the
136 neighboring valley. Hawai'i is the endangered and threatened specieis capitol of the world.
137 Hawai'i Greenhouse Gas Sequestration Task Force members Susan Crow and Jonathan Deenik
138 wrote that “Hawaii has 10 of the 12 soil orders and 70% of global climatic life zones.
139 Compaction makes measurement difficult in many of our soils. Predictive models do not match
140 our measured values.” Life of the Land's Initial Brief filed on September 16, 2019. (“Initial
141 Brief’) at 59.
^ In re Application of Hawai'i Electric Light Co.https://law.justia.eom/cases/hawaii/supreme-court/2019/scot-17-0000630.html
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 8
142 Agricultural bioenergy operations are extremely complex. Models are necessary to
143 simplify and easily comprehend complexity. At the one extreme is that so much complexity
144 remains that understanding it is impossible. At the other end of the spectrum, oversimplification
145 provides no value. The sweet spot is in the middle.
146 Some energy systems are simple. Natural gas seeped out of the ground and burned
147 continuously in ancient Greece. The Oracle at Delphi was built at that spot. Agriculture is at the
148 other end of the spectrum -- complex systems of systems in which each part of the system is
149 itself a dynamic, complex system.
150 “Reproducibility and Replicability in Science” (2019) is “a Consensus Study Report of
151 the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (“NASEM”) published by the
152 National Academies Press.
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
“We define reproducibility to mean computational reproducibility—
obtaining consistent computational results using the same input data,
computational steps, methods, code, and conditions of analysis; and
replicability to mean obtaining consistent results across studies aimed at
answering the same scientific question, each of which has obtained its own
data. In short, reproducibility involves the original data and code;
replicability involves new data collection and similar methods used by
previous studies. A third concept, generalizability, refers to the extent that
results of a study apply in other contexts or populations that differ from
Contributors included the (1) Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science; (2) Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences; Committee on National Statistics; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; (3) Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board; Division on Earth and Life Studies; (4) Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics; Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; and (5) Board on Research Data and Information; Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy; Policy and Global Affairs, https://doi.org/10.17226/25303. https://www.nap.edU/download/25303#
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 9
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
the original one. A single scientific study may entail one or more of these
concepts.” NASEM at 1-2
“Important throughout this process is the sharing of data and methods and
the estimation, characterization, and reporting of uncertainty. Reporting
of uncertainty in scientific results is a central tenet of the scientific process,
and it is incumbent on scientists to convey the appropriate degree of
uncertainty to accompany original claims.” NASEM at 6
“REPRODUCIBILITY [] RECOMMENDATION 4-1: To help ensure the
reproducibility of computational results, researchers should convey clear,
specific, and complete information about any computational methods and
data products that support their published results in order to enable other
researchers to repeat the analysis, unless such information is restricted by
nonpublic data policies. That information should include the data, study
methods, and computational environment:
• the input data used in the study either in extension (e.g., a text file or a
binary) or in intension (e.g., a script to generate the data), as well as
intermediate results and output data for steps that are nondeterministic and
cannot be reproduced in principle;
• a detailed description of the study methods (ideally in executable form)
together with its computational steps and associated parameters; and
• information about the computational environment where the study was
originally executed, such as operating system, hardware architecture, and
library dependencies. (Library dependency,2 in the context of research
software as used here, is the relationship of pieces of software that are
needed for another software to run. Problems often occur when installed
software has dependencies on specific versions of other software.)”
NASEM at 7-8
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 10
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
“Expected Results from Attempts to Reproduce Research. If sufficient
data, code, and methods description are available and a second researcher
follows the methods described by the first researcher, one expects in many
cases full bitwise reproduction of the original results—that is, obtaining
the same exact numeric values.” NASEM at 8
“RECOMMENDATION 6-1: All researchers should include a clear,
specific, and complete description of how the reported result was reached.
Different areas of study or types of inquiry may require different kinds of
information. Reports should include details appropriate for the type of
research, including:
• a clear description of all methods, instruments, materials, procedures,
measurements, and other variables involved in the study;
• a clear description of the analysis of data and decisions for exclusion of
some data and inclusion of other;
• for results that depend on statistical inference, a description of the
analytic decisions and when these decisions were made and whether the
study is exploratory or confirmatory;
• a discussion of the expected constraints on generality, such as which
methodological features the authors think could be varied without
affecting the result and which must remain constant;
• reporting of precision or statistical power; and
• a discussion of the uncertainty of the measurements, results, and
inferences.” NASEM at 13
“Replicability and reproducibility are crucial pathways to attaining
confidence in scientific knowledge, although not the only ones.” NASEM
at 17
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 11
222 Governments must protect public trust resources under the public trust doctrine. The
223 precautionary principle states that when an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the
224 environment, the government must place greater weight on protecting resources and less weight
225 on increasing profits by the private sector.
226
227 Life of the Land's mission is to preserve and protect the life of the land through sound
228 energy and land use policies and to promote open government through research, education,
229 advocacy and, when necessary, litigation. Life of the Land has been a party or participant in
230 more than 50 Commission regulatory proceedings since 1971 dealing with all aspects of electric
231 and gas regulation.
232 Life of the Land asserts that every energy project has positive and negative economic,
233 environmental, social, cultural, geographic, greenhouse gas, taxpayer and ratepayer impacts. Life
234 of the Land is concerned with the impacts, externalities and unintended side-effects of energy
235 projects and programs. Life of the Land asserts that the climate crisis is an existential threat to all
236 life on our planet, that equity, equality, and justice are of paramount importance. Over the
237 decades. Life of the Land has provided expert testimony in Commission proceedings on climate
238 change, environmental justice, cultural perspectives, externalities, bioenergy and other big
239 picture issues.
240 The Climate Crisis is an existential threat to all life forms in the planet.
241 The climate crisis is killing people, destroying ecosystems, and wrecking havoc on the
242 planet. At the rate things are going, children bom today will be alive in the year 2100, a
243 benchmark year for the climate nightmare. Testimony by Assistent Executive Director Kat Brady
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 12
244 in docket no. 2005-0145 explored the dangerous impacts associated with climate change. (LOL-
245 T-l-EXH-11)
246 David Wallace-Wells is the deputy editor of New York and the author of The
247 Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming. He gave the keynote address at the second annual Ha
248 O Ke Kai Hawai'i Climate Conference held in January 2020. Half of all carbon emissions have
249 occurred in the past 30 years, 85% since World War II. One generation caused most of the
250 problems. The next generation must solve the problems left behind. The temperature will rise
251 anywhere from 2 to 8 degrees by the end of the century. “Between 1.5 degrees and 2 degrees of
252 warming, just that extra half-degree of warming, is going to kill 150 million people from air
253 pollution alone.” Beginning in 2011, about a million Syrian refugees streamed across Europe
254 causing massive political change. Climate change refugees will number between 100 and 500
255 million by the end of the century. That is at least 100 times as much as the Syrian exodus.
256 Houston saw five 500-year storms in five years. A 500-year storm means a storm that’s
257 supposed to hit once every 500 years. We’re talking about one storm that was supposed to hit
258 during the entire period from the Spanish discovery, settlement, the colonial period, through the
259 American Revolution, the empire of slavery, the Civil War, World War I, World War II,
260 everything that we’ve known since World War II, our imperial moment, our post-Cold War, etc.,
261 all the way to the present day, we’re supposed to see one storm of that kind in all of that time.
262 Again, Houston saw five (5) 500-year storms in five (5) years. A 4°C increase by 2100 would
263 bring $600 trillion in global climate damages.
264 Hurricane Maria: European, Californian, and Australian wildfires; coral bleaching; one
265 heat record after another in Honolulu in 2019; stationary rain bombs; Hurricane Lane narrowly
266 missing Hawai'i. We are facing a non-linear explosion of events that will destroy the world that
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 13
267 we know. Extreme weather events will devastate people, flora, and fauna in the short run. Entire
268 regions will become uninhabitable in the lifetime of children bom today. Those communities tied
269 to geographical places - the Eirst Nations - will see the destmction of their way of life. Those
270 who did not cause the problem will suffer. The Syrian exodus - which transformed Europe - will
271 be miniscule compared to the billion people who will migrate to seek places of refuge.
272 Low lying Pacific Islands are and will continue to be impacted. East Island was an island,
273 formerly about 1 l-acres in area, half a mile long and 400 feet wide. It was the second-largest in
274 the Erench Erigate Shoals, and one of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, approximately 550
275 miles northwest of Honolulu It was largely washed away in 2018 by the storm surge from
276 Hurricane Walaka.
277 Climate change is the existential threat to planetary ecosystems. There are models of
278 likely future events, how likely a 2°C is, what the impacts will be, etc. The problem is that the
279 statistical variation is not a bell curve. There are increasing threat of low-probability, high-
280 impact events. The planet has the highest levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere in the
281 history of mankind. The models are dealing with unprecedented levels that are getting worse.
282 Some believe that we should focus on padding the train cars as we race at ever higher speeds off
283 the climate cliff. When will we acknowledge that the planet is fat approaching the point of no
284 return, where the inevitable cannot be stopped.
285 Hawai'i Act 32 SLH 2017 (SB559 SDl HD2 CDl): “The legislature finds that not only is
286 climate change real, but it is the overriding challenge of the 21st century [] Climate change poses
287 immediate and long-term threats to the State's economy, sustainability, security, and way of life.”
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 14
288 HRS §225P-1: The purpose of this chapter is [] for the State to [] Mitigate its greenhouse
289 gas emissions by sequestering more atmospheric carbon and greenhouse gases than the State
290 produces as quickly as practicable, [emphasis added]
291 A three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a two-to-
292 one decision on Juliana v. United States on January 17, 2020. The majority opinion asserted that
293 the danger is real, but the court should give deference to the executive branch under the political
294 question doctrine.
295 The majority opinion stated.
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
"In the mid-1960s, a popular song warned that we were 'on the eve of
destruction.' The plaintiffs in this case have presented compelling
evidence that climate change has brought that eve nearer. A substantial
evidentiary record documents that the federal government has long
promoted fossil fuel use despite knowing that it can cause catastrophic
climate change, and that failure to change existing policy may hasten an
environmental apocalypse."
"The record leaves little basis for denying that climate change is occurring
at an increasingly rapid pace. It documents that since the dawn of the
Industrial Age, atmospheric carbon dioxide has skyrocketed to levels not
seen for almost three million years. For hundreds of thousands of years,
average carbon concentration fluctuated between 180 and 280 parts per
million. Today, it is over 410 parts per million and climbing. Although
carbon levels rose gradually after the last Ice Age, the most recent surge
has occurred more than 100 times faster; half of that increase has come in
the last forty years.
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 15
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
"Copious expert evidence establishes that this unprecedented rise stems
from fossil fuel combustion and will wreak havoc on the Earth’s climate
if unchecked. Temperatures have already risen 0.9 degrees Celsius above
pre-industrial levels and may rise more than 6 degrees Celsius by the end
of the century. The hottest years on record all fall within this decade, and
each year since 1997 has been hotter than the previous average. This
extreme heat is melting polar ice caps and may cause sea levels to rise 15
to 30 feet by 2100. The problem is approaching “the point of no return.”
Absent some action, the destabilizing climate will bury cities, spawn life-
threatening natural disasters, and jeopardize critical food and water
supplies.
"The record also conclusively establishes that the federal government has
long understood the risks of fossil fuel use and increasing carbon dioxide
emissions. As early as 1965, the Johnson Administration cautioned that
fossil fuel emissions threatened significant changes to climate, global
temperatures, sea levels, and other stratospheric properties. In 1983, an
Environmental Protection Agency ('EPA') report projected an increase of
2 degrees Celsius by 2040, warning that a “wait and see” carbon emissions
policy was extremely risky. And, in the 1990s, the EPA implored the
government to act before it was too late. Nonetheless, by 2014, U.S. fossil
fuel emissions had climbed to 5.4 billion metric tons, up substantially from
1965. This growth shows no signs of abating. Erom 2008 to 2017,
domestic petroleum and natural gas production increased by nearly 60%,
and the country is now expanding oil and gas extraction four times faster
than any other nation.
"The record also establishes that the government’s contribution to climate
change is not simply a result of inaction. The government affirmatively
promotes fossil fuel use in a host of ways, including beneficial tax
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 16
345
346
347
348
349
350
provisions, permits for imports and exports, subsidies for domestic and
overseas projects, and leases for fuel extraction on federal land."
"The government by and large has not disputed the factual premises of the
plaintiffs’ claims."
351 “A Climate-Lawsuit Dissent That Changed My Mind” by Robinson Meyer, The Atlantic,
352 January 22, 2020.^^
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
"The case was always a long shot, and the response of even the friendliest
legal experts has been dismay but not surprise. I’ll admit that, as a climate
reporter, I had tuned the case out. The kids were asking a federal court—
and, inevitably, the Supreme Court—to take one of its most extraordinary
interventions into American life since Brown v. Board of Education,
which ended lawful racial segregation in public schools.
"Yet addressing the climate crisis through the judiciary would be much
harder than abolishing segregation—and everyone in the case seemed to
know it. As the kids’ legal team argued, fixing climate change requires the
full-scale transformation of the country’s energy system. It would require
investing money in some practices and banning others. It would, at the
very least, require the government to stop leasing public lands for oil and
gas extraction. This kind of detail-oriented policy making always makes
judges nervous. Federal judges are a peaceable cohort who, faced even
with a grave crisis, prefer to stick to conflict resolution.
https://www.theatlantic.eom/science/archive/2020/01/read-fiery-dissent-childrens-climate-case/605296/
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 17
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
"The kids, in response to this issue, asked the courts merely to order that
Congress and the president write their own plan to fight climate change.
Even this proved too ambitious. Hurwitz ruled that even if the courts
issued such an order, there would be no way to measure the sufficiency of
the plan without again engaging injudicial policy making.
"And honestly, that may be a blessing for climate-concerned progressives.
Since the kids first sued, in 2015, the judiciary has been flooded with
conservatives: One in every four circuit judges is now a Donald Trump
appointee. Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Supreme Court’s environmental
swing vote, has retired. It was never clear to me why the kids ’ presumably
left-leaning lawyers wanted this newly conservative judiciary and this
Supreme Court to formulate new constitutional climate law.
"And yet. As I read the sole dissenting opinion in the case, written by
Judge Josephine Staton, I found myself moved. I urge you to read it, even
if you are not familiar with legal jargon or if you are broadly skeptical of
the case’s aims. I’ve reproduced it below."
"The dissent begins with a thunderclap. Tn these proceedings, the
government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping
point crying out for a concerted response—yet presses ahead toward
calamity,' Staton writes. 'It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth
and the government decided to shut down our only defenses. Seeking to
quash this suit, the government bluntly insists that it has the absolute and
unreviewable power to destroy the Nation.'
"This is the central thrust of Staton’s argument: that according to studies
conducted by the federal government—studies that were not challenged
by either the Trump administration or the courts—climate change has the
potential to destroy the federal government. 'Plaintiffs bring suit to
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 18
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
enforce the most basic structural principle embedded in our system of
ordered liberty: that the Constitution does not condone the Nation’s willful
destruction,' she writes. In the face of such danger, even partial action by
the judiciary is justified. 'Considering plaintiffs seek no less than to
forestall the Nation’s demise,' she says, 'even a partial and temporary
reprieve would constitute meaningful redress.'
"The physics of the threat of climate change specifically justify action,
since every additional molecule of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
makes global warming worse. 'The majority portrays any relief we can
offer as just a drop in the bucket,' she writes. 'In a previous generation,
perhaps that characterization would carry the day and we would hold
ourselves impotent to address plaintiffs’ injuries. But we are perilously
close to an ovefriowing bucket. These final drops matter. A lot. Properly
framed, a court order 'even one that merely postpones the day when
remedial measures become insufficiently effective—would likely have a
real impact on preventing the impending cataclysm.'
"Furthermore, she argues that the courts do have an extraordinary
responsibility to take action when the nation—or the Constitution—is
threatened.”
424 Indigenous People and Climate Impacts
425 “An Indigenous People’s Right to Environmental Self-Determination: Native Hawaiians and the
426 Struggle Against Climate Change Devastation”, D. Kapua‘ala Sproat (LOL-T-l-EXH-10)
427
428
429
430
“Recent reports estimate that millions of people across the world will be
forced to relocate as a result of rising seas, flooding, drought, and
increased storms. In this context, climate change's impacts, 'while
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 19
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
problematic for all peoples, fall[] disproportionately on Native peoples in
the regions such as the Arctic and Pacific, where the environment is
closely tied to indigenous lifeways. In many cases, simply accepting the
inevitability of global, warming and adapting 'will prove genocidal for
many groups of indigenous people.' From Papua New Guinea, to the
Arctic, to Bangladesh, 'loss of homeland is already occurring and may
accelerate as slow-onset and sudden disasters due to climate change
compromise human habitats.' Because indigenous peoples share a spiritual
and cultural connection to ancestral resources, any such loss will result in
the loss of culture. For many, climate change threatens the very survival
of entire territories and peoples. Communities ill threatened areas are
seriously considering relocation as a last resort, and many are already
moving. But forcing adaptation or migration amplifies longstanding
injustice because 'from an indigenous perspective, justice can only be
achieved by an affirmative commitment to protect indigenous peoples
within their traditional lands.' The decision to stay or move raises
significant political, legal, and cultural issues and, for some, neither
adaptation nor migration is an option because indigenous identity and
entire cultures and ways of life are inextricably bound to specific lands
and resources.
“Professor Tsosie is a leading scholar examining the harmful impact of
climate change on indigenous peoples. Based on her review of empirical
studies, along with her insight as a Native American academic, she
concluded that the deleterious impacts of climate change on native peoples
are extensive and are likely to become increasingly ubiquitous. Those
effects reverberate through indigenous land, culture, economics, and self-
governance. In important respects, they will imperil indigenous peoples'
very survival. Her inquiry also revealed that current responses to climate
change are sorely inadequate, in part because indigenous peoples often
lack the political and financial resources to rectify the issue on their own. ”
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 20
462
463 Temporal Differences: 2030 v 2050
464 Dr. Charles “Chip” Fletcher is the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor,
465 Department of Earth Sciences, at the School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology
466 (SOEST), University of HawaiT at M^oa. He is also the Vice-Chair of the Honolulu Climate
467 Change Commission.
468 Dr. Eletcher asserts that the world must be caron neutral by 2050. Since undevloped
469 countries need time to achieve economic growth, developed countries should reach carbon
470 neutrality by 2030.
471 “The biofuel production process may best be conceptualized and characterized as a
472 system of systems (SoS). [] frameworks which consider all biogenic carbon within plants to be
473 carbon neutral simplify implementation and are reasonably accurate for bioenergy systems where
474 carbon sequestration and release are temporally close e.g. annual crops, but fail to capture the
475 more complex carbon dynamics of forests. Additionally, accounting methods deliver varying
476 results depending on the scope and boundaries of the investigated system. Such discussions
477 about and criticism of forest-based bioenergy systems and accounting frameworks show the
478 importance of timing related to biogenic carbon emissions that are not necessarily compensated
479 for by contemporaneous sequestration and the accumulation of carbon and emissions in forests,
480 forest products or atmosphere. The temporal framing of forest carbon stocks and flux differs
481 between forest type and forest management as work by others has shown. This creates additional
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 21
482 variation and uncertainties when assessing carbon dynamics and the possible climate change
483 mitigation potential of forest-based bioenergy.
484 Carbon Debt Parity v Carbon Sequestration Parity
485 Carbon Debt Parity is used in many nioenergy life cycle analyses. It misses a key
486 component in acurate accounting.
487 “The carbon dioxide (and other greenhouse gases) released by the burning of woody
488 biomass for energy, along with their associated life-cycle emissions, create what is termed a
489 ‘carbon debt’ - i.e. the additional emissions caused by burning biomass instead of the fossil fuels
490 it replaces, plus the emissions absorption foregone from the harvesting of the forests.
491 [emphasis added]
492 “The capacity for forests to aid in climate change mitigation efforts is
493 substantial but will ultimately depend on their management. If forests
494 remain unharvested, they can further mitigate the increases in atmospheric
495 CO2 that result from fossil fuel combustion and deforestation.
496 Alternatively, they can be harvested for bioenergy production and serve
497 as a substitute for fossil fuels, though such a practice could reduce
498 terrestrial C storage and thereby increase atmospheric CO2 concentrations
499 in the near-term. Here, we used an ecosystem simulation model to
500 ascertain the effectiveness of using forest bioenergy as a substitute for
501 fossil fuels, drawing from a broad range of land-use histories, harvesting
502 regimes, ecosystem characteristics, and bioenergy conversion efficiencies.
Eight Principles of Uncertainty for Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuel Systems (2015) by Adam J. Liska, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953418303532
Woody Biomass for Power and Heat: Impacts on the Global Climate. Duncan Brack, Chatham House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs — Environment, Energy and Resources Department | Eebruary 2017https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2017-02-23-woody-biomass-global-climate-brack-fmal2.pdf
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 22
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
Results demonstrate that the times required for bioenergy substitutions to
repay the C Debt incurred from biomass harvest are usually much shorter
(< 100 years) than the time required for bioenergy production to substitute
the amount of C that would be stored if the forest were left unharvested
entirely, a point we refer to as C Sequestration Parity. The effectiveness
of substituting woody bioenergy for fossil fuels is highly dependent on the
factors that determine bioenergy conversion efficiency, such as the C
emissions released during the harvest, transport, and firing of woody
biomass. Consideration of the frequency and intensity of biomass harvests
should also be given; performing total harvests (clear-cutting) at high-
frequency may produce more bioenergy than less intensive harvesting
regimes but may decrease C storage and thereby prolong the time required
to achieve C Sequestration Parity.
517 It is critical to count the carbon sequestration that is annihilated by chopping down a tree.
518 “Trees put on weight faster and faster as they grow older according to a new study in the journal
519 Nature. The finding that most trees’ growth accelerates as they age suggests that large, old trees
520 may play an unexpectedly dynamic role in removing carbon from the atmosphere.
521 “Here we present a global analysis of 403 tropical and temperate tree species, showing
522 that for most species mass growth rate increases continuously with tree size. Thus, large, old
523 trees do not act simply as senescent carbon reservoirs but actively fix large amounts of carbon
Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production. Mitchell, S.R.; Harmon, M.E.; O'Connell, K.B. 2012. Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production. GCB Bioenergy. 4: 818-827. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/47697
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/trees-grow- faster-and-store-more-carbon-they-age
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 23
524 compared to smaller trees; at the extreme, a single big tree can add the same amount of carbon to
525 the forest within a year as is contained in an entire mid-sized tree.”^^
526 Global Forests
527 Yale University ecologist Thomas Crowther led the study on global forests published in
528 the journal Nature. “The global extent and distribution of forest trees is central to our
529 understanding of the terrestrial biosphere. We provide the first spatially continuous map of forest
530 tree density at a global scale. This map reveals that the global number of trees is approximately
531 3.04trillion.”^^
532 “[E]ach year there is a gross loss of 15 billion trees and a net loss of 10 billion [] There
533 are currently fewer trees than at any point since the start of human civilization and this number is
534 still falling at an alarming rate [] If anything, the scale of these numbers just highlights the need
535 to step up our efforts if we are going to begin to repair some of these effects on a global scale.
536 Securities and Exchange Commission Petition.
537 “The petitioners are Partnership for Policy Integrity and 27 institutions, investors and
538 advisors that utilize Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Socially Responsible
539 Investment (SRI) strategies, that seek to invest in companies offering climate change mitigating
540 innovations and operational strategies.
Stephenson, N.L., et al. 2014. Rate of tree carbon accumulation increases continuously with tree size. Nature. DOT 10.1038/naturel2914 https://www.nature.com/articles/naturel2914
Crowther, T., Glick, H., Covey, K. et al. Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature 525, 201-205 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/naturel4967
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-science-trees/earth-has-3-trillion-trees-but-thevre-falling- at-alarming-rate-idUSKCN0R21Z620150902
https://'WWW.pfpi.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/SECPetitionAccurateBiogenicCarbonReporting2.27.2019.pdf
Id
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 24
541 “We respectfully petition the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to issue
542 guidance under regulation S-K regarding how companies should disclose information about
543 emissions of greenhouse gases from manufacturing and use of biomass-based fuels and
544 products.
545 “Companies manufacturing and selling biomass-based fuels and products often make
546 dubious or unsubstantiated claims that the products reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
547 The growth of these products and a surge of interest in investments that promise to reduce GHG
548 emissions mean that such claims are likely to be material to an increasing number of investors. A
549 survey of public-facing materials and SEC disclosures of 10 US companies selling biomass-
550 based fuels and products revealed that that in each case, disclosures about GHG emissions were
551 largely unsubstantiated and sometimes misleading.
552 “A growing number of scientists and policymakers understand that biomass is not an
553 instantaneously carbon-neutral source of renewable energy, and in many cases may never
554 achieve true carbon neutrality. [] Replacing coal with wood pellets not only increases C02 stack
555 emissions but also the net emissions impact over time, taking into consideration “foregone
556 carbon sequestration” due to forest harvesting - that is, the C02 that trees would have continued
557 removing from the atmosphere, if they had not been harvested and burned for fuel.”^^
Id22 Id23 SEC Petition, Exhibit A. https://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/2Q19/ptn4-741-exa.pdf
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 25
558 The European Academies' Science Advisory CounciP"^ published “Forest bioenergy,
559 carbon capture and storage, and carbon dioxide removal: an update” in February 2019.^^
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
“Biomass should not be regarded as a source of renewable energy under
the EU’s Renewable Energy Directive (RED) unless the replacement of
fossil fuels by biomass leads to real reductions in atmospheric
concentrations of C02 within a decade or so.”
“While the simple concept of carbon neutrality had merely presumed that
carbon released into the atmosphere when biomass was burnt would be
reabsorbed through regrowth at some stage, the limited amount of time
remaining before Paris Agreement targets are exceeded on current trends
means that the payback period is highly significant.”
“Recent reviews of the many possible bioenergy scenarios that consider
all climate effects show how forest bioenergy systems can have higher
cumulative C02 emissions than a fossil reference system (from a few
decades to several centuries), while other factors which must be
considered are any effects on N20 emissions and biogeophysical impacts,
such as albedo change. The biomass sources which can reliably provide a
short-term climate mitigation effect are biomass that would otherwise be
burned without energy recovery, rapidly decomposing residues and
organic wastes, and biomass outtakes from forests affected by high
mortality rates.”
European Academies' Science Advisory Council (EASAC) is an independent body of membership of 16 national science academies from the 15 EU member states together with Academia Europea and ALLEA (All European Academies). The aim of the Council is to provide authoritative scientific judgement to the policy makers of the European Union on a wide variety of topics.25
https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/Negative_Carbon/EASAC_Commentary_F orest_Bioenergy_Feb_2019_FINAL.pdf
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 26
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
“EASAC also pointed to the perverse incentives that result from the
accounting rules of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change, which record forestry harvesting emissions together with those
from land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) and (to avoid
double-counting) as 'zero' when burnt. As pointed out, ‘current rules allow
countries to record imported biomass as zero emission on combustion,
giving a false impression of the importing country’s progress towards
reducing emissions, and shifting responsibility for LULUCF reporting to
the exporting country’. Currently there is no requirement in the EU’s
Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) to consider the length of the payback
period when reporting biomass emissions as zero.”
“EASAC thus encourages the European Commission to explore options to
introduce more robust accounting rules under the ETS to emissions from
converted power stations, in order to differentiate between different
sources of forest biomass. Emissions reporting would then reflect the real
contribution of biomass energy to climate change mitigation in
comparison with other forms of renewable energy.”
“EASAC had emphasised the need to reverse current trends towards
deforestation and soil degradation which continue to add substantial
quantities of C02 and other greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, at the
same time as seeking to increase land carbon stocks.”
Docket Issues
610 The Public Utilities Commission issued an order establishing that all parties and
611 participants can address all issues. Life of the Land asserts that there are four issues: (1) does the
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 27
612 proposal make sense from a technical perspective (reliability, resilience, ancillary services)?, (2)
613 is the proposed project economical compared with alternatives?, (3) what greenhouse gas
614 (“GHG”) impacts does the project have?, and (4) what non-GHG environmental impacts does the
615 proposed project have?
616 Hu Honua likes secrecy, like where trucks carrying logs on the Big Island are coming
617 from and where they go to after dropping off logs at Hu Honua. A person could follow the trucks
618 or have to have privy to confidential documents. Hu Honua will raise rates, increase greenhouse
619 gas emisssions, while they refuse to explain their environmental impact. This project is part of
620 the past rather than being part of the Hawai'i‘s energy transformation. Their argument about
621 being better than fossil fuel is outdated and irrelevant.
622 Hu Honua asserts that environmental impacts are not the kuleana of the Commission
623 even though the Commission authorized a study of externalities almost 30 years ago and
624 continued therefrom. Hu Honua asserts that all agricultural impacts belong to affiliated
625 companies that all not parties in the docket. Hu Honua asserts that they will be carbon neutral
626 within 30 years. The proposed Paeahu Solar would be carbon negative in its first year. Hu Honua
627 asserts that this is equivalent to their project. Hu Honua has variously stated that they will plant
628 trees, that they won't plant trees, that tree planting operations are part of affiated companies
629 operations and thus not relevant to this proceeding, that they could plant enough trees so that the
630 project would be carbon negative, and that agriculturally-related issues need to be filed in
631 confidential filings. Their climate model lacks analysis, and the project lacks accountability and
632 transparency; instead it is a study in obfuscation.
Prior Commission Orders Re Environmental Externalities, Initial Brief at 40-43
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 28
633 Hu Honua stated that their proposed plant would be at least 21.6% efficient, that is, at
634 most 78.4% of the energy in the trees would be lost as heat to the air or injected in injection
635 wells where the heat would find its way into the ocean. Response to LOL-HHB-IR-172
636 Hu Honua asserted how the heat affects the ocean is irrelevant to this proceeding.
637 Response to LOL-HHB-IR-47
638 We asked several questions about whether the forest razing activities would harm bats
639 and/or endangered and threated bird species. Hu Honua asserted that the answer wasn't relevant
640 to the proceedings. Responses to LOL-HHB-IR-46, LOL-HHB-IR-93, LOL-HHB-IR-94,
641 LOL/HHB-SIR-29 LOL-HHB-SIR-43, LOL/HHB-SIR-52, LOL/HHB-SIR-53.
642 The Department of Health sets annual allowable pollution units. These are upper gross
643 limits. What is useful is the emissions for each toxic per MWh. Hu Honua would not provide an
644 answer. Responses to LOL-HHB-IR-90, LOL-HHB-SIR-45
645 Hu Honua made several claims about carbon neutrality. Hu Honua refused to disclose
646 emails with regulators about carbon neutrality claims. Responses to LOL-HHB-SIR-54 Ref:
647 LOL/HHB-IR-99
648 Hu Honua asserted that they “INTEND to utilize several methods to offset the project’s
649 greenhouse gas emissions” including contracts with Hu Honua affiliates, maybe plant trees
650 elsewhere, and maybe purchase carbon credits. Response to LOL-HHB-SIR-18 [emphasis added]
651 We simply want to know what the greenhouse gas intensity of the proposed project. After
652 12 years, we still don't know.
653 Hu Honua assrted that they were using the Clean Development Mechanism
654 Methodological Tool, Version 4.0 to determine greenhouse gas emissions. We asked “For each
655 CDM Tool spreadsheet file (or other relevant format) please provide live cell logic, references.
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 29
656 calculations and formulas unhidden and unprotected.” We didn't get an answer. Response to
657 LOL-HHB-SIR-3.
658 We asked numerous questions about the CDM Model. All of Hu Honua's responses
659 refered us to one response to the Consumer Advocate. Responses to LOL/HHB-SIR-11 through
660 LOL/HHB-SIR-17, LOL/HHB-SIR-21, LOL/HHB-SIR-22, etc.
661 Hu Honua referred us to their answer to CA/Hu Honua-IR-37 and its attached Exhibit 5
662 which contains 9 tables. Hu Honua asserted that they evaluated greenhouse gas emissions using
663 the Clean Development Mechanism Methodological Tool, Version 4.0 which can be found at a
664 url which is linked to the actual url which contains a 30-page overview document. The document
665 does not explain the specific formula used by Hu Honua.
666 To show carbon neutality one can examine one megawatt-hour of electricity produced.
667 What is the total greenhouse gases produced? What is the formula used to generate that number?
668 What is the total amount of greenhouse gases sequestered? What is the formula used to generate
669 that number? Based on the answers provided by Hu Honua, we haven't absolutely no idea.
670 Most of the carbon in the atmosphere-vegetation-soil cycle is found in the soil. In
671 agricultural operations, changes to soil is critical to understand environmental and climate
672 impacts. We asked, “For each property where biomass will be harvested, (a) please state whether
673 HHB will be determining, analyzing, recoding, and/or documenting changes to (1) soil organic
674 carbon, (2) soil nitrogen levels, (3) pesticide and herbicide use, [] (7) agricultural land
675 management (8) nonpoint source pollution.” “Hu Honua objects to this information request to the
676 extent that it is irrelevant to the issues in this proceeding, immaterial, unduly burdensome, vague
677 and ambiguous, onerous, repetitious, unintelligible, argumentative, utilizes terms that have
678 multiple interpretations but are not properly defined or explained, privileged, and/or subject to
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 30
679 protection. [] Without waiver of these objections, Hu Honua responds as follows [] Hu Honua
680 does not provide a response.” Response to LOL/HHB-IR-110.
681 Hu Honua was quick to point out solar and wind are not carbon neutral. “Hu Honua is
682 unaware of any solar or wind projects on Hawaii island that are, have plans to be, or have PPAs
683 that contemplate such projects becoming carbon neutral.” Response to LOL/HHB-SIR-75(a)
684 There are many interlocked entities that are or were linked to Hu Honua, or its parent
685 companies. Many of these entities have contracts with or are part of the proposed project. They
686 include Hu Honua BioEnergy LLC, Island Bioenergy, LLC, Hu Honua Ethanol, EEC, Island
687 Bioenergy, LLC, Grandis Ventures I, and CN Renewable Resources, LLC. We asked, “Eor each
688 entity in the HHB Eamily, please provide the following information: (a) what is their mission and
689 goal? (b) who is on their board of directors? (c) who serves on any advisory board? (c) what was
690 and is their connection to Hu Honua? (d) are they an agricultural company and if so, why? (e)
691 what contracts do they have for fuel, wood, trees?” LOL/HHB-IR-1. Hu Honua refused to
692 answer the question.
693 Hu Honua executives sent emails which are part of the official record located on the
694 Comiission's Document Management System. We identified the emails and asked whether they
695 violated ex parte rules since hard copies were not sent to all parties. In each case Hu Honua
696 reponded, “Hu Honua does not know what email is being referenced, or the context of such
697 email.” LOL/HHB-SIR-27, LOL/HHB-SIR-28
698 One thing is certain. The price that Hu Honua will sell electricity to HELCO is more than
699 twice the price of recently signed solar plus storage contracts.
700 In short, Hu Honua is a moving target where none of it makes sense.
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 31
701 My curriculum vitae is documented in Exhibit 1 of Life of the Land's Motion to
702 Intervene in docket no. 2017-0105, filed on January 2, 2018. My agricultural expertise is
703 documented in Life of the Land's Exhibit 3 in docket no. 2017-0122, filed on May 24, 2017. My
704 experience in appearing before the Public Utilities Commission in 50 proceedings is documented
705 at Life of the Land's Responses to Commission Order No. 35433, in docket no. 2017-0105, filed
706 on May 10, 2018. This includes ten bioenergy proceedings.
707 I am sponsoring several exhibits:
708 LOL-T-1 -EXH-1. “Life of the Land, Complainant vs. Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc., Hawaii
709 Electric Light Company, Inc., Maui Electric Company, Limited, and The Gas Company, Lie Dba
710 Hawaii Gas, Respondents”, docket no. 2018-0406, filed December 3, 2018.
711 LOL-T-1-EXH- 2. “Emissions Gap Report 2017, A UN Environment Synthesis Report” by the
712 United Nations Environment Programme.
713 LOL-T-l-EXH-3. “Greenhouse gases triggering more changes than we can handle” (November
714 19, 2018). American Association for the Advancement of Science. Discussion of a scientific
715 study led by University of Hawai'i Professor Camilo Mora.^^
716 LOL-T-1 -EXH-4. “Sea Level Rise Vulnerability & Adaptation Report” (December 2017) by the
717 Hawai'i Department of Land and Natural Resources (“DLNR”) HawaiT Climate Change
718 Mitigation & Adaptation Commission.
719 LOL-T-1 -EXH-5. “Climate Chmige Brief’ (2018) by the City & County of Honolulu Climate
720 Change Commission.
https://wedocs.unep.Org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/22070/EGR_2017.pdf https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-l 1/uoha-ggtl 11518.php https://www.resilientoahu.org/guidance-and-publications
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 32
721 LOL-T-l-EXH-6. “Sea Level Rise Guidmice” (2018) by the City & County of Honolulu Climate
722 Change Commission.
723 LOL-T-1 -EXH-7. “Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Chmige”
724 (“AEWE”) published by the “National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine;
725 Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate; Committee on
726 Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change Attribution”^^
727 LOL-T-l-EXH-8. “Eourth National Climate Assessment.” Volume I: Climate Science Special
728 Report (2017), Volume IE Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States (2018) included
729 Chapter 27: Hawai‘1 and U.S.-Affiliated Pacific Islands by Victoria Keener (East West Center) et
730 al.^^
731 LOL-T-1 -EXH-9 Life of the Land's Initial Brief filed on September 16, 2019. (“Initial Brief’)
732 LOL-T-1 -EXH-10 “An Indigenous People’s Right to Environmental Self-Determination: Native
733 Hawaiians and the Struggle Against Climate Change Devastation”, D. Kapua‘ala Sproat, 35
734 Stan. Envtl L.J. 157 (2016). https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/46075
735 LOL-T-1 -EXH-11 Testimony on climate chmige by Kat Brady (LOL-T-1), Life of the Land's
736 Assistent Executive Director, in docket no. 2005-0145.
737 LOL-T-1-EXH-12 Juliana v. United States, No. 18-36082 D.C. No. 6:15-cv-01517-AA. United
738 States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Eiled January 17, 2020. Before: Mary H. Murguia
739 and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges, and Josephine L. Staton, District Judge. Opinion by
740 Judge Hurwitz; Dissent by Judge Staton.
https://www.resilientoahu.org/guidance-and-publicationshttp://nap.edu/21852
32 https://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/hawaii-and-us-affiliated-pacific-islands-fourth- national-climate-assessment-chapter-27
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 33
741 https://staticl.squm'espace.com/static/571dl09b04426270152febe0/t/5e22101b7a850a06acdfflbc
742 /1579290663460/2020.01.17+JULIANA+OPINION.pdf
743 LOL-T-l-EXH-13 “A Climate-Lawsuit Dissent That Changed My Mind” by Robinson Meyer,
744 The Atlantic, January 22, 2020.^^
745 LOL-T-l-EXH-14 EU Biomass Plaintiffs v. European Union (2019)
746 http://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/eu-biomass-plaintiffs-v-european-union/
747 LOL-T-l-EXH-15 Petition 4-471 (2019) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
748 Commission, https://www.pfpi.net/wp-
749 content/uploads/2019/02/SECPetitionAccurateBiogenicCarbonReporting2.27.2019.pdf As You
750 Sow Cover Letter https://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/2019/ptn4-741-letter.pdf Clear Cut: Wood
751 Pellet Production, the Destruction of Eorests, and the Case for Environmental Justice
752 https://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/2019/ptn4-741-exb.pdf
https://www.theatlantic.eom/science/archive/2020/01/read-fiery-dissent-childrens-climate-case/605296/
Life of the Land's Testimony LOL-T-1, Docket No. 2017-0122 * page 34
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The foregoing LIFE OF THE LAND'S TESTIMONY LOL-T-I was filed eleelronieally with the Publie Utilities Commission, along with fom hard eopies (Commission Order No. 34597, modified by Order No. 34612). Two eopies were hand delivered to Hn Honna, HELCO and the Consnmer Advoeate. One eopy was hand delivered to Tawhiri and HEP. Eleetronie eopies were sent to all parties and partieipants listed below.
JAY GRIFFIN, CHAIRPERSON SANDRA-ANN Y.H. WONG, ESQ.PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION A LAW CORPORATION465 S. King St, Room 103 1050 Bishop Street, #514Honolnin, HI 96813 Honolnin, HI 96813DEAN NISHINA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR KEVIN M. KATSURAATTORNEY DCCA DIVISION OF DIRECTOR REGULATORY NON-RATECONSUMER ADVOCACY PROCEEDINGSP.O. Box 541 P.O. Box 2750Honolnin, HI 96809 Honolnin, HI 96840-0001TEDN. PETIT DEAN T. YAMAMOTOMARK G. VALENCIA WIL K. YAMAMOTOCASE LOMBARDI PETIT, LAW YAMAMOTO CALIBOSO LLLCCORPORATION 1100 Alakea Street, Snite 3100737 Bishop Street, Snite 2600Honolnin, HI 96813
Honolnin, HI 96813
Connsel for HU HONUA BIOENERGY,Connsel for HAMAKUA ENERGY, LLC'S LLC PARTNERS, L.P.DAVID M. LOUIE SHANNON S. BROOMEJOSEPH A. STEWART HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLPAARON R.MUN 50 California Street, Snite 1700KOBAYASHI SUGITA & GODA, LLPFirst Hawaiian Center
San Franeiseo, CA 94111
999 Bishop Street, Snite 2600Honolnin, Hawaii 96813 Connsel for HAMAKUA ENERGY, LLC'S
Connsel for HELCOMYLES F. REYNOLDSHUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP1445 Ross Avenne, Snite 3700Dallas, TX 75202-2755
Connsel for HAMAKUA ENERGY, LLC'S
DATED; JANUARY 28, 2020, Honolnin, Hawaii.
HENRY Q CURTISVICE PRESIDENT FOR CONSUMER ISSUES
FILED
2020 Jan 20 AM 07:^
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
The foregoing document was electronically filed with the State of Hawaii Public Utilities
Commission's Document Management System (DMS).