Upload
frank-dennis
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Barriers to Diabetes ControlBarriers to Diabetes Control
Mark E. Molitch, MD
NHANES: Achieving ADA Recommendations, 2003-2006
• Individuals reaching glycemic control targets:• HbA1c <7% 57.1%
• Individuals achieving other ADA goals of therapy:• BP <130/80 mm Hg 45.5%• LDL <100 mg/dL 46.5%
• Only 12.2% of individuals met all 3 goals
Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; LDL, low-density lipoprotein;
NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Cheung BM, et al. Am J Med. 2009;122:443-453.2
Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes
NOT glyburide, chlorpropamide NOT rosiglitazone
Intensive insulin
At diagnosis:
Lifestyle + MetforminSTEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
Add basal
insulin
Add
sulfonylurea
Add GLP-1
agonist
Add
pioglitazone
HbA1c >7.0%
Add DPP-4
inhibitor
Abbreviations: DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide
Nathan DM, et al. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:193-203.4
Combination Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes:Decision Considerations
HbA1c efficacy Reductions from baseline Reaching target
Synergy of mechanisms of action Side effects and toxicity profile Frequency and severity of hypoglycemia Effect on weight gain Avoiding polypharmacy and complex
regimens Compliance and convenience Cost
5
Barriers to Diabetes Control
• Clinical inertia• Financial• Adverse effects of oral agents• Insulin
• Fear of injections• Fear of hypoglycemia• Complexity of management
• Targets of treatment• Need to adjust to individual patient
• Cultural
6
6
Earlier and More Aggressive Intervention May Improve Treating to Target Compared With Conventional Therapy
Monotherapy
Uptitrate dose of monotherapy
Add 2nd and then 3rd drug
Add basal insulin then
multiple insulin injections per
day
Typical progression is to wait for HbA1c to reach 8–9%
before moving to next step
Moving more aggressively
to more potent treatment can
achieve goal of HbA1c
of < 7% more quickly
7
Advantages & Disadvantages of Type 2 Diabetes MedicationsClass (examples) Potency Risk of hypoglycemia Weight Other
Sulfonylureas (glipizide, glyburide, glimepiride)
+++ +++ Greatest increase
Less likely to maintain control as monotherapy
Meglitinides (nateglinide, rapaglinide)
+ ++ Increase Short acting
Metformin +++ + Neutral GI intolerance, rare lactic acidosis
Thiazolidinediones (Rosiglitazone, Pioglitazone)
++ + Greatest increase
Fluid retention, worsen CHF, fractures. Risk of cardiac events.
α-Glucosidase inhibitors (acarbose, miglitol)
+ + Decrease Intestinal gas, poor tolerance
DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin)
+ + Neutral Headache, risk of infection
GLP-1 analogs (exenatide, liraglutide)
+ + Decrease Injection, GI effects
Insulin +++ +++ Greatest increase
Injection
AACE/ACE Diabetes Algorithm for Glycemic Control. Endrocr Pract. 2009;15:540-559.
Barriers to Insulin Therapy: Common Concerns
Insulin therapy might cause:
• Worsening insulin resistance
– But reduction of glucose toxicity improves resistance
• More cardiovascular risk
– But reduction in glucose improves cardiovascular risk
• Weight gain
– Yes, it does occur with improved metabolic efficiency
• Hypoglycemia
– Very rare with type 2 diabetes
– Common with type 1 diabetes as approaching optimum glycemic control
9
• Rapidly growing populations• High rates of type 2 diabetes and its complications• Groups with unique culture, health beliefs, myths,
and food preferences• Diverse level of education and socio-economic status• Insufficient culturally oriented diabetes care, education,
and research programs • Health care system and health professional barriers
Cultural competency is key to approaching patients in a beneficial way
Challenges and Opportunities in Minority Populations
10
Why We Cannot Always Extrapolate to Older Adults with Diabetes
• Heterogeneity• Comorbid conditions
– Functional limitations– Cognitive decline
• Polypharmacy• Life expectancy versus
– Time to incidence or progression of microvascular or macrovascular complications
– Time to expected benefit of intervention
11