Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Band Company METL Assessment
April 2015
2
Overall AssessmentLast Year This Year
Academic Needs Practice Trained
Military Needs Practice Trained
Moral-Ethical Trained Trained
Physical Fitness Needs Practice Needs Practice
3
Academic Assessment
• Trained• Strengths– 55-60%: Dean’s List and/or Gold Stars– Traditionally strict ESP environment– Highly proactive Academic Officer
• Weaknesses– End of SY1314: 2.78 Cumulative GPA
• Class of 2017: 2.4 Cumulative GPA• 12th of 21
4
Academic Assessment
Cum GPA last year
Cum GPA this year (Fall Term)
Class Absences last year
Class Absences this year
Number Academically Deficient last year
Number Academically Deficient this year
Class of 2015 +3.0 3.23 (3.5) --- 5.92 --- 1
Class of 2016 +3.0 3.11 (3.2) --- 4.92 --- 2
Class of 2017 ~2.4 2.74 (2.9) --- 3.72 --- 5
Class of 2018 --- 2.7 (2.7) --- 6.36 --- 4
Total 2.78 3.07 --- --- 12
5
Academic Pillar Strategy
• Academic Major Accountability Program• 4C + <2.0 UC Study Hall in Jenkins Hall– 4C w/ Dean’s List – Excused Spring Semester
• Strict ESP Environment• Emphasis on Merits (OPD) for A’s– Sophomore privileges based on academic-based
merits
6
Military Assessment
• Trained• Strengths– Traditionally strong performance at Parade– Strong Cadre
• 2 Squad Leaders competitive for Regimental and Battalion Command
– Strong performance at Kelly Cup– Recipient of 4C Retention Award for SY1314
• Weaknesses– Class of 2018: Lost 3 4C
7
Military Assessment
Avg parade results last year
Avg parade results this year
Class I Offenses last year
Class I Offenses this year
Suitability Boards last year
Suitability Boards this year
Class of 2015 --- --- --- 4 --- 0
Class of 2016 --- --- --- 0 --- 0
Class of 2017 --- --- --- 1 --- 1
Class of 2018 --- --- --- 0 --- 0
Total --- --- --- 5 --- 1
8
Military Pillar Strategy
• Strict formations• Strict and daily cadet-run MRI’s (Command
Team, Platoon Leadership)• Strict PAI for formations, pre-parade• Enforcement of 0% Tolerance– Hazing/4C System Violations, SH/SA, AVs
• 1SG and Cadre spread throughout 4C area
9
Moral-Ethical Assessment
• Trained• Strengths– Positive class relationships– Strong junior and senior leadership, mentorship
• Weaknesses– Class of 2017’s SY1314
10
Moral-Ethical Assessment
Number of honor accusations this year
Number of honor accusations last year
Number of “in violation” honor findings last year
Number of “in violation” honor findings this year
Number of sexual harassment/assault incident reports last year
Number of sexual harassment/assault incident reports this year
Class of 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0
Class of 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0
Class of 2017 1 0 0 0 0 0
Class of 2018 1 0 0 1 2 0
Total 2 0 0 0 2 0
11
Moral-Ethical Pillar Strategy
• Proactive Honor Representatives• Heavy restrictions and enforcement of
regulations on Class of 2017– Set attainable goals; remarkable improvement
achieved in conduct and academics
12
Physical Effectiveness Assessment
• Needs Practice• Strengths– Highest individual CPFT score (+420) (1/2201)– Focused and positive Regimental PT atmosphere
• Weaknesses– Traditional weakness– Intramural participation– Lack of incentives for CPFT
13
Physical Effectiveness Assessment
CPFT avg last year
CPFT avg this year
Number of CPFT failures last year
Number of CPFT failures this year
Number of H & W failures last year
Number of H & W failures this year
Class of 2015 --- 245 --- 1 --- 0
Class of 2016 --- 253 --- 3 --- 0
Class of 2017 --- 249 --- 1 --- 1
Class of 2018 --- 253 --- 3 --- 0
Total --- 250 --- 8 --- 1
14
Physical Effectiveness Pillar Strategy
• Regimental PT: CO, XO, 1SG, PLs, PSGs in front– Focused atmosphere– Accountability
• CPFT Improvement– Fall 2014 CPFT Average: 235.71/300– Spring 2015 CPFT Average: 250/300
• Company Takeout Food Policy• PT Mentorship
15
Company Commander/TAC Comments
• Mission was to restore academic status and prepare militarily and physically for the 2015 Edinburgh Tattoo
• 12/21 -> 4/21 (GPA)• Physical fitness needs improvement– “Just passing” CPFT unsatisfactory
