Folie 1iow
[email protected]
iow
Thomas Neumann and Gerald Schernewski
Baltic Sea Research Institute
Different abatement strategies are under discussion
Ecosystem models are appropriate tools for testing different
measures
What are the ecological consequences of different abatement
strategies?
Thomas Neumann
Basin-wide gradient in salinity
No tides
Ice coverage
South-north-spread: ca. 1300 km
West-east-spread: ca. 1000 km
Average depth: 52 m
Maximum depth: 460 m
Population (catchment) 85 millions
The Problem
In the last century the phosphorus input has increased eightfold
and the nitrogen input fourfold
Baltic Sea ecosystem has changed from an oligotrophic state into a
mesotrophic state
Sensitivity of the public to environmental issues of the Baltic Sea
has increased
Thomas Neumann
iow
Ministerial declaration (riparian states) of 1988 set reduction of
the nitrogen and phosphorus loads by 50% as a goal. (proportional
approach)
Because of different anthropogenic loading of the Baltic Sea rivers
from an economic point of view this is not an optimal
solution.
=> An alternative approach suggested by Gren (2000), is to
achieve the 50% nutrient load reduction goal at minimum total
costs. This implies that nutrient load reduction takes place in
countries and drainage basins where it is most cost-efficient.
(cost-effective approach)
Solution?
iow
After Gren in Gren, Turner & Wulff (eds.) (2000): Managing a
Sea
Total annual costs (million €)
Thomas Neumann
MOM3 application to the Baltic Sea
3 nm … 9 nm horizontal resolution
77 vertical layers 3 m … 6 m
Open boundary condition towards the North Sea
ERA-15 / ERA-40 meteorological forcing
N
2
Solar
Radiation
O
2
N
2
Example for a 3D simulation
Thomas Neumann
iow
Reduction after 12 years of simulation time based on an annual
mean.
Phytoplankton biomass is reduced especially near the river
outlets
Strong reduction for Diatoms
Quicker response of nitrogen compared to phosphorus
concentrations
Thomas Neumann
Reduction along an offshore section
Reduced phytoplankton biomass in the Gdansk Bay due to Diatoms and
Flagellates reduction
Enhanced phytoplankton biomass in the central part during summer
due to cyanobacteria
Thomas Neumann
iow
Relative decrease of the inventories for the two load reduction
scenarios
black line: proportional reduction
green line: cost-effective reduction
Quick response of N compared to P
Reduced N to P ratio and in turn enhanced Cyanobacteria
blooms
Thomas Neumann
In general the cost-effective approach produces lower
concentrations in the southern part and higher concentrations in
the northern part of the Baltic Sea.
This is as expected because of the stronger load reduction in the
southeastern drainage area. However, the differences are comparable
small. Cyanobacteria are most sensitive.
Cost-effective approach minus proportional approach compared to the
control run
Thomas Neumann
Further nutrient reduction with the cost-effective approach
Thomas Neumann
With the cost-effective approach especially the phosphate reduction
is less compared to the proportional approach.
Thomas Neumann
Thomas Neumann
Riverborne nutrient load reduction yields lower nutrient
concentrations and phytoplankton biomass. However, for at least a
transition period enhanced cyanobacteria blooms can be
expected.
The offshore regions are more affected than the central
regions.
A cost-effective abatement strategy does not restrict the overall
response of the Baltic Sea ecosystem.
The uneven load reduction to different areas produce stronger
effects in the southeastern part of the Baltic Proper compared to
the proportional reduction.
Spatial differences in the achieved reduction effect are less then
10% related to the control simulation.
1
9
6
0
1
9
6
5
1
9
7
0
1
9
7
5
1
9
8
0
1
9
8
5
1
9
9
0
1
9
9
5
2
0
0
0
0