24
A randomized trial of anthracycline dose intensification during induction in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study E1900 Hugo F. Fernandez, MD; Zhuoxin Sun, PhD; Mark R. Litzow, MD; Selina M. Luger, MD; Elisabeth M. Paietta, PhD; Gordon Dewald, PhD; Rhett P. Ketterling, MD; Jacob M. Rowe, MD; Hillard M. Lazarus, MD; Martin S. Tallman, MD

Background

  • Upload
    cherie

  • View
    17

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A randomized trial of anthracycline dose intensification during induction in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study E1900. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Background

A randomized trial of anthracycline dose intensification during induction in younger

patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology

Group study E1900

Hugo F. Fernandez, MD; Zhuoxin Sun, PhD; Mark R. Litzow, MD; Selina M. Luger, MD; Elisabeth M. Paietta,

PhD; Gordon Dewald, PhD; Rhett P. Ketterling, MD; Jacob M. Rowe, MD; Hillard M. Lazarus, MD;

Martin S. Tallman, MD

Page 2: Background

Background

• In younger adults (<60 years old) with newly diagnosed AML:– Daunorubicin 45mg/m2/day CR rates of 50 -75%– Anthracycline dose-intensification during induction

may improve CR:• SWOG daunorubicin 70mg/m2/d

– High CR rates in young group

• CALGB 9621- daunorubicin 90-95mg/m2/d – High CR rates/ tolerable toxicity

– OS improvement not demonstrated in a randomized trial.

Page 3: Background

E1900: Objectives

Primary Objective:– To compare OS between two induction regimens

daunorubicin 45mg/m2 vs. 90mg/m2/d

Secondary Objectives:– Evaluate impact of allogeneic SCT in AML patients

with unfavorable prognostic factors

– Evaluate impact pre HSCT GO on DFS

Planned accrual goal: 830 patients

Closed November 2008- 657 patients.

Page 4: Background

Eligibility

• De novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia– Per WHO 2001 criteria

• Age 16-60 years

• No prior treatment

• No MDS > 6 months

• Allogeneic or autologous HSCT candidate

Page 5: Background

ECOG Protocol E1900:Schema

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin

6 mg/m2 IV x 1

Daunorubicin45 mg/m2/day x 3

or90 mg/m2/day x 3

+Cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day x 7

Allogeneic HSCT

CR

HighIntermediate

HiDAC x 2;PBSC Harvest

after 2nd course

Autologous SCTBusulfan IV 0.8 mg/kg Every 6 hrs x 16 doses

Cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg/d x 2

FavorableIntermediateIndeterminate

Closed to accrual 10/2007

Risk Allocation

Persistent AML:2nd cycle ofDaunorubicin 45mg/m2/d x3Cytarabine 100mg/m2/d x7

Page 6: Background

Results

• 657 patients entered

• Age: median 48 (17 to 60 ) years

• Patient demographics similar

• Disease characteristics similar

• Data base closed as of March 1, 2009

• 547 evaluable for response

Page 7: Background

Disposition of Patients

Entered657

Randomized to 45mg/m2

330Randomized to 90mg/m2

327

Evaluable for Response293

Evaluable for Response289

Complete Remission168 (57.3%)

Complete Remission204 (70.6%)

Page 8: Background

Results: Toxicity

• Induction deaths were similar– 45mg/m2 : 4.5%; – 90mg/m2 : 5.5%

• Grade 3/4 toxicity similar

• High-dose daunorubicin arm – Cardiac toxicity not increased – Did not impact delivery of HSCT

Page 9: Background

Post-remission

• Patients allocated to:– Allogeneic: high risk – Autologous : favorable, intermediate

• Recovered from induction toxicity

• 341/657 (51.9%) registered to second step– 49.9% transplanted

• 34 received allogeneic transplant• 136 received autologous transplant

Page 10: Background

Induction Treatment CNSRFAIL MEDIANTOTAL45 mg/m2/day 330 199 131 15.790 mg/m2/day 327 168 159 23.7

Pro

babi

lity

Log Rank Test p=0.003

Overall Survival by Induction Treatment-All Patients

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Months

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

OS by Induction-All Patients

Page 11: Background

OS by Induction: <55years

Induction Treatment CNSRFAIL MEDIANTOTAL45 mg/m2/day 238 128 110 16.590 mg/m2/day 221 94 127 28.6

Pro

babi

lity

Log Rank Test p=0.002

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Months

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Page 12: Background

OS by Induction:≥55 Years

Induction Treatment CNSRFAIL MEDIANTOTAL45 mg/m2/day 78 49 29 12.690 mg/m2/day 96 58 38 16.3

Pro

bab

ilit

y

Log Rank Test p=0.63

Overall Survival by Treatment -- Age>=55

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Months

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Page 13: Background

Cytogenetic Risk

45mg/m2 90mg/m2 Total p

Favorable (%) 11.6 15.6 13.6 0.40

Intermediate (%) 43.3 39.9 41.1

Indeterminate (%) 27.1 26.1 26.6

Unfavorable (%) 18.0 19.3 18.7

Page 14: Background

OS by Induction: Favorable and Intermediate

Induction Treatment CNSRFAIL MEDIANTOTAL45 mg/m2/day 180 95 85 20.790 mg/m2/day 178 71 107 34.3

Pro

babi

lity

Log Rank Test p=0.004

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Months0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Page 15: Background

Induction Treatment CNSRFAIL MEDIANTOTAL45 mg/m2/day 59 46 13 10.290 mg/m2/day 63 45 18 10.4

Pro

babi

lity

Log Rank Test p=0.45

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Months

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

OS by Induction: Unfavorable

Page 16: Background

Response by Mutational Analysis

Page 17: Background

OS by Induction: FLT3 Positive

Induction Treatment CNSRFAIL MEDIANTOTAL45 mg/m2/day 83 65 18 10.290 mg/m2/day 64 39 25 15.2

Pro

babi

lity

Log Rank Test p=0.091

Overall Survival by Induction Treatment--FLT3 Positive Patients

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Months0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Page 18: Background

OS by Induction: FLT3 Negative

Induction Treatment CNSRFAIL MEDIANTOTAL45 mg/m2/day 215 119 96 18.990 mg/m2/day 241 116 125 28.6

Pro

babi

lity

Log Rank Test p=0.014

Overall Survival by Induction Treatment--FLT3 Negative Patients

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Months0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Page 19: Background

CNSRFAIL MEDIANTOTALFLT3 ITDNegative 241 116 125 28.6Positive 64 39 25 15.2

Pro

babi

lity

Log Rank Test p=0.009

Overall Survival by FLT3 at the high dose

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Months0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

OS Daunorubicin 90mg/m2/d: FLT3 Status

Page 20: Background

OS by Induction: MLL Positive

Induction Treatment CNSRFAIL MEDIANTOTAL45 mg/m2/day 16 15 1 16.290 mg/m2/day 15 10 5 19.0

Pro

babi

lity

Log Rank Test p=0.30

Overall Survival by Induction Treatment--MLL-PTD Positive Patients

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Months0 10 20 30 40 50

Page 21: Background

OS by Induction: MLL Negative

Induction Treatment CNSRFAIL MEDIANTOTAL45 mg/m2/day 290 175 115 15.190 mg/m2/day 296 149 147 25.0

Pro

babi

lity

Log Rank Test p=0.002

Overall Survival by Induction Treatment--MLL-PTD Negative Patients

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Month

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Page 22: Background

Conclusions

• In AML patients <60 years, induction therapy with daunorubicin 90mg/m2/d: – Is safe– Improves CR rates: 70.6% vs. 57.3%– Improves OS: 23.7 vs. 15.7 mo.– 45mg/m2/d is no longer the standard dose

Page 23: Background

Future Directions

• Randomized trial of other anthracycline doses – Daunorubicin 60 mg vs. 90 mg/m2/day– Idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day vs. 90 mg/m2/day

• Focus on shortcomings – Patients older than 55 years- P-gp inhibitors- Zosuquidar

– Unfavorable cytogenetics– Mutation abnormalities

• FLT3 positive- CALGB 10603- RATIFY trial• MLL

Page 24: Background

Acknowledgements

Investigators

• Martin Tallman• Hillard Lazarus• Mark Litzow• Selina Luger• Jacob Rowe• ECOG E1900 PIs

Laboratory• Elisabeth Paietta

• Janis Racevskis

• Rhett Ketterling

• Gordon DeWald

• Gary Hicks

• John Bennett

Data/ Statistics• Zhuoxin Sun

• Julie Mann

• Xiaopan Yao