15
Back to the Future Back to the Future An Experiment in: An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative A Reflective Qualitative Study Study Curtis Congo, Ed.D.

Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

Back to the FutureBack to the Future

An Experiment in:An Experiment in:

DEVELOPING SMALLDEVELOPING SMALLGROUP LEADERSGROUP LEADERS

A Reflective Qualitative StudyA Reflective Qualitative Study

Curtis Congo, Ed.D.

Page 2: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

INTRODUCTION

1. Statement of the Problem

2. The Purpose of this Experiment

Page 3: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

THOUGHT REVIEW

1. Jesus

2. Robert Coleman

3. Jamie McDonald

4. Jethro

5. Personal

Page 4: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

Quotes: 1. “You have hurdled the major roadblocks to success when you know the difference between motion & direction.”

2. “Start small, slow & solid.”

Page 5: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

DESIGN OF THE EXPERIMENT

Page 6: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

THE RESULTS

1. Leaders with vision

2. Leaders with commitment

3. Competent teaching skills

4. Understanding how to share their story

Page 7: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

5. Salvation experiences

6. Leadership multiplication

7. Leaders staying the course

8. Perfection not important but rather serving with our limitations

Page 8: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

9. Small Group dynamic management

10. Leaders with stronger people/ relational skills

11. Leaders with stronger caring/ pastoral skills

12. Leaders with greater boldness in decision-making

Page 9: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

13. Stronger marriages

14. Use of or discovery of passion

15. More people effectively & pastorally ministered to

16. Closing the back door

Page 10: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

17. Financial impact

18. Impatience of people who were not a part of the process

19. Not all who enter the process will pass the test

20. People rise to a ‘Call’ that has meaning & involves sacrifice far more than just taking on a role without thought & direction

Page 11: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe ExperimentCONCLUSIONS

1. The Master Plan of Evangelism (Leadership Development) works

2. Some will fail the test

3. Leadership development makes sense

4. There are long-term benefits

Page 12: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe ExperimentCONCLUSIONS

5. People will respond to a ‘Call’ that involves purpose & training

6. Relational training is far greater than other practices

7. Modelling leadership is far more impacting than other means of training

Page 13: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

IMPLICATIONS

1. We need (no matter the size of church) to develop leaders

2. Jesus gave a model that can & should be followed

Page 14: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment

Page 15: Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL GROUP LEADERS A Reflective Qualitative Study Back to the Future An Experiment in: DEVELOPING SMALL

The ExperimentThe Experiment