Upload
others
View
20
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
-~ I
\SL OF T ECNp.
AUG 15 1266
USE OF ELECTRICAL PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS
TO MEASURE SOIL PRESSURE
by
RICHARD SWAN LADD
BSCE, Northeastern University
(1962)
Submitted in partial
of the requirements for
fulfillment
the degree
Master of Science
at the
Massachusetts Institute
1966
of Technology
/7Signature redacted
Signature of Author . . . . . . .. . ...
Department of Civil EngineeringJune 20, 1966
Signature redacted
Certified by ............................... .- - - - -Cetfe0y0 Thesis Supervisor
Signature redacted
Accepted by ............Chairman, Departmental Committee
on Graduate Students
of
~~AL~e
38ABSTRACT
USE OF ELECTRICAL PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS
TO MEASURE SOIL PRESSURE
by
RICHARD SWAN LADD
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering on June20, 1966, in partial fulfillment of the requirements forthe degree of Master of Science.
The application of electrical transducers to measuresoil pressures against planar surfaces is described, withemphasis on the determination of the coefficient of earthpressure at rest (K ) for cohesive soils. Data are pre-sented on the value of Ko for a saturated silty clay(Boston Blue Clay) as a function of consolidation pressure,maximum past pressure and overconsolidation ratio. Thesedata were obtained via a square fixed ring oedometer whichhad a Dynisco pressure transducer screwed into one side ofthe cell. Although the observed values of K appear rea-sonable and are consistant with other publis~ed data, thedegree of accuracy is unknown. Attempts to calibrate thetransducer by comparing measured versus applied averagepressures on a planar surface are described. These resultsindicated that the measured pressure is directly related tothe applied soil pressure.
Thesis Supervisor: A. E. Z. Wissa
Title: Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering
-2-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author is indebted to Professors C. C. Ladd,
K. Hoeg, H. M. Horn, and A. E. Z. Wissa for their many
helpful suggestions and their guidance in the prepara-
tion of this thesis.
-3-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Title Page
Abstract
Acknowledgement
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
INTRODUCTION
MEASUREMENTS OF THE COEFFICIENT
OF EARTH PRESSURE AT REST (K 02.1 Scope
2.2 Preparation of BostonBlue Clay
2.3 Equipment and Related Problems
2.3.1 Electrical Equipment
2.3.2 K Cell0
2.4 Test Procedure
2.4.1 Calibration of PressureTransducer
2.4.2 Trimming Soil Sample
2.4.3 Loading Sequence
2.4.4 Measurements
2.5 Test Results
2.6 Comparison with Other Results
2.7 Discussion of K Cell
CALIBRATION OF PRESSURE TRANSDUCERWITH A SOIL PRESSURE
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Equipment
3.2.1 Disk
-4-
1
2
3
4
6
7
9
11
11
11
11
11
12
13
13
13
13
21
15
16
18
21
21
21
21
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
3.2.2 Electrical Equipment
3.2.3 Pressure Cells
3.3 Test Procedures
3.3.1 Calibration of PressureTransducer
3.3.2 Trimming Soil Sample
3.3.3 Oedometer Unit
3.3.4 Triaxial Cell
3.4 Test Results
3.4.1 Oedometer Results
3.4.2 Triaxial Cell
3.4.3 Summary
3.5 Discussion of Test Results
3.5.1 Seating and ArchingEffects
3.5.2 Frictional Effects
3.6 Conclusions and Recommendations
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
PREPARATION OF BOSTON BLUE CLAY
PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS
B.1 Pressure Transducers and Asso-ciated Instrumentation
B.l.1 Design of Gauge
B.l.2 Related ElectricalEquipment
B.2 Calibration of Pressure Transducer
B.2.1 General
B.2.2 Calibration when ExcitationVoltage is Directly Mea-sured
B.2.3 Calibration when ExcitationVoltage is IndirectlyMeasured
LIST OF NOTATIONS
Page No.
21
22
22
22
22
22
23
23
24
25
25
26
26
27
28
30
35
64
68
68
68
68
69
69
70
71
76
-5-
* in--------------------------------------------
LIST OF TABLES
No. Title Page No.
I Properties of Boston Blue Clay 37
II Typical Calibration of Pressure Trans-ducer using VTVM Voltmeter 38
III Typical Calibration of Pressure Trans-ducer using Digital Voltmeter 39
IV Results of K Test on BBC 40
V Typical Values of Friction Angle for 42BBC
VI Soil Pressure in Consolidation Unit 42
a) With Filter Paper 43b) Without Filter Paper 44
VII Soil Pressure Results in Triaxial Cellwithout Teflon 45
VIII Soil Pressure Results in Triaxial Cellwith Teflon
-6-
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Title Page No.
Grain Size Distribution - BostonBlue Clay 47
K Cell 48
Volumetric Strain vs. Log Consoli-dation Stress for Boston Blue Clay 49
Vertical Stress vs. Horizontal Stressin K Test on Boston Blue Clay 50
Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Restvs. Overconsolidation Ratio for BostonBlue Clay 51
Jackson's Triaxial K Cell 52
Ko vs. Overconsolidation Ratio forSeveral Clays 53
Effect of Side Friction on Value of K 540
Disk for Calibration of Transducer 55
Oedometer Unit with Transducer 56
Triaxial Cell with Transducer 57
Pressure System for Triaxial Cell 58
Results of Oedometer Test - Ratio ofP /P vs. P 59
Results of Triaxial Test without Teflon -Ratio of P /P vs. P 60m a a
Results of Triaxial Test with Teflon -Ratio of P /P vs. P 61
m a aEffect of Friction on Stress Distribution inOedometer Test 62
Effect of Friction on Stress Distributionin Triaxial Test 63
-7-
LIST OF FIGURES (Contd.)
Figure No.
Appendix A
A-1
A-2
Appendix B
B-1
B-2
Title Page No.
Self-Extruding Consolidometer
Method of Slurry Placement
Schematic Diagram of Dynisco Gauge
Voltage Change of 6 Volt Wet CellBattery vs. Time
-8-
66
67
74
75
Chapter I
INTRODUCTION
A frequent problem in testing the properties of soil
has been the accurate measurement of soil pressures against
"rigid" surfaces. This retaining surface is usually used
in direct or indirect measurements of the following soil
properties or stresses:
(1) Coefficient of earth pressure at rest - K0(2) Coefficient of active earth pressure - Ka
(3) Coefficient of passive earth pressure - Kp
(4) Major principal stress - a1(5) Minor principal stress - a3(6) Intermediate principal stress -2
In some cases the total load is measured and then an
assumption is made relative to the stress distribution. In
a conventional triaxial test, the stress on the top cap and
bottom platten is assumed equal to the measured load divided
by the area of the sample. In an oedometer test, the applied
vertical stress is assumed to be uniform and equal to the
applied load divided by the area. In other cases, a surface
might be instrumentated with strain gauges, such as in a K0
cell. In this case the confining ring of the oedometer has
strain gauges and the lateral pressure is assumed uniform and
proportional to the hoop strain measured by the strain gauges.
An inherent problem in most measuring systems lies in
the assumption relating a computed or measured value to the
true stress at the interface. Inaccuracies could arise from:
(1) The existance of shear stresses on planes which
are assumed to be principal planes, such as at the
top and bottom of triaxial samples;
(2) The presence of shear stresses along the
-9-
circumference of oedometer samples and also along
the top and bottom caps;
(3) Deflections of the "rigid" surface used to
measure the soil pressures causing arching.
The use of electrical pressure transducers to measure
soil pressures on a plane surface can minimize some of these
problems since the transducer is highly rigid and is designed
to measure pressures directly. Because pressure transducers
have a flat measuring surface, they can only measure soil
pressures which act against a flat surface.
There are many possible applications for the use of
pressure transducers, some being:
(1) When one cannot measure the total load, or
if it would be very difficult to do so;
(2) When edge effects would cause a non-uniform
pressure distribution over most of the surface;
(3) Whenthe system used to measure total load
would not be rigid enough and yet maintain the re-
quired sensitivity;
(4) To measure the distribution of pressure over
a surface.
-10-
Chapter 2
MEASUREMENTS OF THE COEFFICIENT OF
EARTH PRESSURE AT REST (K )
2.1 Scope
K measurements, obtained by using an electrical
pressure transducer in the side of a square oedometer, are
presented on both normally and over-consolidated Boston
Blue Clay (BBC). These data are compared with K measure-
ments obtained from other equipment and procedures on BBC
and on other soils.
2.2 Preparation of Boston Blue Clay
The tests were performed on samples of Boston Blue
Clay consolidated from a dilute slurry, as described in
Appendix A. The soil was obtained from the M.I.T. campus,
air dried and ground, and mixed with salt water (16 g/l
NaCl) to form a slurry which was then consolidated one-2
dimensionally in a large cell to 1.5 kg/cm . Specimens
were trimmed from this large batch which had an average
water content of 32%, a void ratio of 0.93, and a degree of
saturation of about 99%.
This soil is a silty clay with a Unified Soil classi-
fication of CL. Table I lists its mineralogic composition,
Atterberg limits and some engineering properties. The grain
size distribution curve is plotted in Fig. 1 (for the soil
after grinding and after being scalped on a No. 200 sieve).
2.3 Equipment and Related Problems
2.3.1 Electrical Equipment
The transducer was a Dynisco Model APT 25 with a
pressure range of 0 to 200 psia excited by an Allstate 6 volt
-11-
wet cell battery. The millivolt output was measured by a
VTVM vacuum tube voltmeter model 1477 by Daystrom, Inc.,
Weston Instrument Division.
A full description of the equipment and problems re-
lated to their use are presented in Appendix B.
2.3.2 K Cell0
Since a flat surface was required, a 2 inch square
cell with a height of 1 inch was made out of 3/4 in. brass
stock (see Fig. 2).
When the cell was designed no provisions were made
to clamp the cell to the bottom stone or to have the dial
supports rigidly connected to the cell. Therefore changes
in height of the soil could not be measured with a high
degree of accuracy. A standard platform scale loading frame
(Fig. IX-3 of Lambe, 1951) was used to apply the loads.
One of the main problems in using pressure trans-
ducers in this manner is in machining the parts so that the
transducer face will align perfectly with the plane surface
which comes into contact with the soil. There are three
criteria to meet:
(a) The transducer face is not recessed or pro-
truding;
(b) The transducer face is perfectly parallel
with the plane surface;
(c) There is not a large gap surrounding the trans-
ducer face, i.e., less than .0005 in. As a rough
guideline, one should not feel any irregularity when
moving one's finger across the transducer face if
the alignment is proper.
-12-
2.4 Test Procedures
All testing was carried out in a constant temperature
room ( l0 C) to help eliminate changes in battery voltage and
in soil properties.
2.4.1 Calibration of Pressure Transducer
The transducer was calibrated both in and out of the
K cell using the procedure outlined in Appendix B. Both
calibrations were made to see if the very close tolerances
of the transducer in the cell would affect its calibration,
because in future designs it might be impractical to cali-
brate the transducer in place. The results showed the
calibrations to be identical.
Typical calibration results are given in Tables II
and III.
2.4.2 Trimming Soil Sample
Individual test specimens were cut from half moon
chunks of the consolidated batch (see Appendix A) by using
a wire trimmer wherein four individual wires formed a
square. The square was a little larger than the K cell so
that there was a tight fit between the soil and the cell
walls. The soil was placed in the cell by sliding the cell
down over the soil specimen. Finally the top and bottom
was trimmed flush with the cell with a wire saw.
2.4.3 Loading Sequence
The loading sequence deviated from the standard pro-
cedure of doubling the load, in that at higher pressure
(above 4 to 8 kg/cm ) the pressure was increased or decreased2
by 2 kg/cm . This enabled more K readings to be taken.
There were two load-unload cycles in the test and each
-13-
increment was left on for at least 24 hours.
2.4.4 Measurements
Three measurements were taken: vertical stress on the
soil (av); horizontal stress (ah) from the transducer; and
change in height of the sample during loading. The vertical
stress was assumed to be equal to the vertical applied load
divided by the area of the cell. The change in height of
the sample was obtained by a 0.0001 in. per division Ames
dial which, as previously mentioned, was not securely attached
to the cell. This fact could have caused inconclusive mea-
surements, although during testing there did not seem to be
any significant errors.
The procedure described below was used to obtain these
measurements:
(a) One day before the soil was to be placed in the
cell, all of the electrical equipment was connected
and turned on, with the transducer screwed into the
cell.
(b) On the following day the MV reading of the volt-
meter was taken to establish the zero reading, i.e.,
MV . The electrical connection to the transducer was
then disconnected (Fig. 2) to facilitate the place-
ment of the soil in the cell.
(c) After the soil was placed in the cell the
transducer was reconnected and the K cell and asso-0
ciated parts were placed in the loading frame as
shown in Fig. 2.
(d) Before applying a load increment of 1/8 kg/cm2
to the soil, the following items were performed
rapidly: Water was added to the container; a tare
reading on the platform scale was taken; the dial
-14-
indicator was set, and the millivolt change was re-
corded for the calibration resistor.
(e) During each load increment, dial and MV readings
were taken at time intervals normally used in consoli-
dation testing.
(f) Prior to each load increment the MV change due
to insertion of the calibration resistor was recorded
to re-establish the calibration factor for the next
increment of load and to see if the final pressure
reading had to be corrected.
2.5 Test Results
Test results at the various vertical stress increments
are presented in Table IV. From this table the following
plots were made:
(1) Volumetric strain vs. vertical stress (AH/H0vs. Ov) - Fig. 3.
(2) Vertical stress vs. horizontal stress (v vs.
h) - Fig. 4.
(3) Coefficient of earth pressure at rest vs.
overconsolidation ratio (h v vs. / v or vs.O.C.R.) - Fig. 5.
The results of other consolidation tests on similarly
prepared BBC with different ring sizes and/or type of ring
lining are also plotted in Fig. 3. This figure shows that
the volumetric strain during loading is higher in the K test.
This fact suggests that the sample had more disturbance and/
or that soil was squeezed out of the cell since the top stone
was not recessed in the cell at the start of the test as it
was in the other tests. When comparing the plots in rebound,
the slope at an O.C.R. of 16 is smallest in the K test by a
factor of about 1.6. This suggests that there was more fric-
tion in the K cell than in the other tests.0
-15-
When the data are plotted with av vs. h in Fig. 4,
a line representing K can be established for normally con-
solidated clay, with K = 0.48. This figure also shows that
as the sample is rebounded from a maximum past pressure (a )
and as the sample becomes more overconsolidated, K increases
and eventually becomes greater than 1. This relationship is
shown in Fig. 5 where K is plotted against the O.C.R. to a
log scale. Fig. 5 also shows that there is a linear relation-
ship between K and log O.C.R. for an O.C.R. from 1 to 10,
but after an O.C.R. of about 10, K increases very rapidly.
A maximum K value of 4.6 was measured at the maximum O.C.R.0
of 96.
2.6 Comparison with Other Results
Jackson (1963) obtained a K value of 0.50 0.04 for
similarly prepared normally consolidated BBC. He used a
triaxial cell (Fig. 6) where the lateral strain was main-
tained close to zero by controlling the volume of mercury
in a chamber which totally confines the sample and top
loading cap.
Several investigators have reported relationships
between values of K for normally consolidated soils and the0
effective stress friction angle, P. Bishop (1958) and
Simons (1958) found good agreement between measured and pre-
dicted values using Jaky's (1948) original expression, K0 =
1-sin T. Brooker and Ireland (1965) found that the empirical
relationship K = 0.95-sin 4 better fit their experimental
data on five clays of low to high plasticity.
Application of the relationship K = 1-sin 4 to BBC0
yields K = 0.46 to 0.55 depending upon the value of S
chosen. Table V presents values of W obtained from triaxialcompression tests. Values of T vary depending upon:
-16-
(1) Which criteria of failure is used, i.e., maxi-
mum obliquity or maximum stress difference;
(2) The value of K (-ah /'v) at consolidation;
(3) Type of shear test, i.e., drained or undrained.
When these values are compared with the average K0value of 0.48 obtained in this investigation, one can only
state that this type of K test yields values which seem to
be reasonable.
There are no other K data on overconsolidated BBC.0
The data can only be compared with trends which other inves-
tigators have found. Figure 7 presents a plot of K versus
overconsolidation ratio to a log scale for:
(1) BBC from this investigation;
(2) Three clays of low to moderate plasticity from
Brooker and Ireland (1965). They employed an oedo-
meter in which a portion of the cell ring was re-
placed by a steel membrane covering a pressure
chamber filled with oil. An automatic control device,
actuated by electrical strain gauges on the steel
membrane, controlled the oil pressure such that there
was zero lateral strain. This pressure was equated
to the lateral stress acting on the sample. The
vertical stress was carried in increments up to a
value of 2200 psi (155 kg/cm ) and then reduced in
increments to zero;
(3) The Weald Clay from Henkel and Sowa (1963),
who controlled the lateral strain in a triaxial
cell. Their maximum vertical stress was about 12
kg/cm2
One notes that the relationships for the Weald Clay
between K and O.C.R. from the two sets of investigators
showed a significant difference. This difference could have
-17-
been caused by the different experimental procedures, by
the difference in stress level, and/or by slight differences
in soil properties.
The results for BBC obtained in
the same general trends as observed by
on clays of similar plasticity. Hence
to yield reasonable data.
the K cell follow 0
other investigators
the cell again appears
2.7 Discussion of K Cell
In the design of a K cell, the two most important 0
factors to consider are side friction and the rigidity of
the cell and transducer. These two items will be discussed
separately.
To measure K properly there should not be any side 0
friction, but inherently there has to be some side friction
in this type of cell. Therefore, several questions arise:
(1) How does this friction, which causes shear
stresses on the transducer's face, affect the trans
ducer in its ability to measure normal stresses?
(2) To what extent does side friction cause the
actual value of lateral stress to deviate from the
true K value for no side friction? 0
(3) What is the effect of side friction on the
vertical stresses on the top and bottom of the
sample?
The amount of side friction can be reduced by lining
the cell walls with teflon and/or by decreasing the height
to width ratio. However, further research is required to
answer the above questions. For example, the amount of side
friction could be varied by changing the roughness of the
cell walls and noting the effects on measured K values. 0
-18-
Another procedure would measure the coefficient of friction
between the wall and the soil and then use this information
to compute the effect on K0
from the Mohr's circle, as illus
trated in Fig. 8. The simplified analysis shows a reduction
in K0
from 0.48 to 0.42 for a coefficient of friction of 0.31
along the walls of the cell.
Regarding the influence of side friction on vertical
stresses, one could measure the vertical force in the oedo
meter ring and thereby compute the average vertical stress
on the bottom of the sample, as was done for the study of
compacted soils (M.I.T., 1963). They found large differ
ences in top and bottom stresses, especially for heavily
overconsolidated samples.
To measure K properly there should not be any lateral 0
movement of the soil. In this case both the confining ring
and the transducer's diaphragm should be absolutely rigid.
Since this is impossible, allowable movements have to be
chosen so that the measured K value is very close to the 0
"true" value (neglecting friction) • In choosing these allow-
able movements, one would not only know how the flexibility
of the cell and transducer affects the measured value, but
also how the combined movements affect the measured value.
In determining the allowable wall movement of the
cell, one approach would be to first determine the wall
movement that would cause an active pressure case, and then
design the cell to have a movement which is one tenth to one
hundredth of this value. In sands an active case of ob
tained when there is a strain of about 5 x 10-3 , where the
strain is the lateral wall movement divided by the height
of the sample. There is very little, if any, published
data on what strain causes an active case in clays, but one
could assume it would be larger than for sands. Therefore,
a wall movement causing a strain of less than 1/10 of
-19-
5 x 10 3 should be adequate in measuring K in clays.
Deflection measurements were not taken when hydro-
static water pressures were applied to the cell so an accu-
rate estimate of the deflection of the walls cannot be
quoted. The calculated deflections, making many simpli-
fying assumptions, is of the order of 0.0004 inches at the2
maximum horizontal stress of about 6 kg/cm2. This gives a
strain of 4 x 10 4, which is probably adequate.
In determining the allowable deflection of the trans-
ducer's diaphragm there is some literature which discusses
the effect of the rigidity of the gauge on the pressure which
it measures in relation to the assumed applied pressure.
Trollope and Lee (1961) showed that the gauge can be more
flexible when it is used to measure pressures in clay than in
sand. They concluded that to measure clay pressures against
a plane surface when using a circular measuring cell, one
should use two design criteria. These are: (1) at maximum
design pressure, the ratio of central deflection to the dia-
meter of the gauge should be less than 1:2000; (2) the ratio
of central deflection (dA) to the change in applied pressure
(dp) should be less than 10 5 in./psi. Therefore, if the
gauge meets these requirements it should measure the pres-
sures accurately providing other effects, such as seating,
do not five intolerable errors.
For the Dynisco transducer used in these tests, the
ratio of central deflection to diameter at maximum measured
pressure was approximately 1:3000 and the ratio of dA/dp was
approximately 1.75 x 10-6 in/psi. Therefore, the trans-
ducer should have an adequate amount of rigidity to mea-
sure the soil pressure accurately.
-20-
Chapter 3
CALIBRATION OF PRESSURE TRANSDUCER
WITH A SOIL PRESSURE
3.1 Introduction
This investigation was aimed at the following ques-
tion: If a uniform soil pressure acts on a rigid planar
surface, will a pressure transducer inserted into this sur-
face measure the correct pressure? Because of the diffi-
culty in actually achieving a uniform soil pressure, two
methods of pressure application were employed in order to
study the effects of variable voundary conditions.
3.2 Equipment
3.2.1 Disk
The circular disk with the transducer in its center
was made of stainless steel and is shown in Fig. 9. It was
machined with great care so that the transducer would fit
properly, but because the transducer was out of shape one
edge of the transducer's face was 5 ten thousands of an inch
above the disk's surface, while the opposite edge was 5 ten
thousands below the disk's surface.
A teflon sheet (0.005 in. thick) was bonded to the
disk, but not to the transducer's face, with a very thin
film of flexible epoxy.
3.2.2 Electrical Equipment
The transducer was a Dynisco Model APT 25 with a
pressure range of 0 to 200 psi, excited by an Allstate 6
volt wet cell battery. The millivolt output was measured by
a Keithley or an Electro Scientific Industries voltmeter. A
description of these items is given in Appendix B.
-21-
3.2.3 Pressure Cells
Two types of cells were used to apply the soil pres-
sure to the disk. The first was a standard fixed ring con-
solidation unit in which the disk with the transducer be-
came the top cap. This unit is shown in Fig. 10. Note that
the ring was lined with teflon to reduce friction. The
second was a Norwegian triaxial cell which had been modified
to accommodate the disk with the transducer. This set up
is shown in Fig. 11.
3.3 Test Procedures
All testing was carried out in a constant temperature
room ( 1*C).
3.3.1 Calibration of Pressure Transducer
The transducer was calibrated both in and out of the
disk, with and without the teflon sheet on the surface.
This was done by the procedure outlined in Appendix B, ex-
cept when the transducer was in the disk. In this case,
the disk was placed in the triaxial cell and the pressure
was applied by an air regulator. The results of each cali-
bration proved to be practically identical. Typical results
of a calibration are given in Table III.
3.3.2 Trimming Soil Sample
The same soil that was used in the K tests was0
trimmed to a diameter of about 2.78 inches using a proce-
dure similar to that described in Chapter IX of Lambe
(1951). The height of the samples was about 0.5 inches.
3.3.3 Oedometer Unit
In a preliminary investigation it was found that
-22-
66
eccentricity of the load on the top cap was a major problem.
Therefore, extreme care was taken when this unit was placed
in the loading frame to prevent this eccentricity.
Filter paper was placed between the soil and the disk
to facilitate removal of the soil from the disk. The pres-
sure was applied by increasing or decreasing the axial load
in 10, 50, or 100 pound increments (100 lbs. exerted a pres-
sure of about 17 psi). The load on the soil was cycled
during the test, i.e., the load was reduced to zero and then
reapplied in the above mentioned increments.
Each load was left on for at least 24 hours. During
this time, readings were taken on the transducer and sample
height to ensure that an equilibrium condition was obtained.
Loads left on for longer periods of time did not cause any
significant change in the measured pressure.
3.3.4 Triaxial Cell
The trimmed sample was placed on the disk and en-
closed in a specially made latex membrane, trying to entrap
as little air as possible. A rubber band wrapped around the
disk a few times sealed the membrane.
The cell pressure was applied by air pressure using
a Nullamatic air regulator which had a sensitivity of about
1/8 psi. To prevent air diffusion through the membrane, the
system shown in Fig. 12 was used. The pressure was applied
in 5 to 10 psi increments. As in the oedometer test, the
pressure was cycled during the test and each increment of
pressure was left on for at least 24 hours. During each in-
crement, transducer and volume change readings were recorded.
3.4 Test Results
The data are presented as a ratio of the measured
-23-
pressure to the applied pressure versus the applied pressure,
i.e., P /P versus P . The data from the oedometer test and
the two triaxial tests are summarized in Tables VI, VII, and
VIII, and are plotted in Figs. 13 through 15.
3.4.1 Oedometer Results
Figure 13 shows the ratio of Pm a versus Pa for the
oedometer test with and without filter paper placed between
the soil and the disk. This figure shows the following gen-
eral trends:
During loading with filter paper:
(1) When the applied pressure was small (less than
about 10 psi), the error was large, with Pm /Pa greater
than one.
(2) At applied pressures greater than 20 to 40 psi,
the ratio of Pm a remained relatively constant with
a small difference of less than 5%.
During loading without filter paper:
(1) The ratio of Pm Pa was always less than one,
with a maximum difference of 6%.
During unloading:
(1) The ratio Pm a increased and approached a
value of 1.25 0.1 at overconsolidation ratios ex-
ceeding 2 to 3.
In summary, the measured pressure was close to the
applied pressure (within 6%) during loading, providing the
applied pressure was greater than about 30 psi. But during
unloading, the measured pressure became much higher than the
applied pressure, with a difference as high as 35%. At zero
pressure, the measured pressure was essentially zero (note
-24-
that this is not shown in Fig. 13).
3.4.2 Triaxial Cell
The test results (P /P versus Pa) from two cycles of
loading for the disk with and without a teflon sheet are
presented in Figs. 14 and 15 respectively. The following
trends occurred:
(1) Disk without teflon covering:
During initial loading the ratio PM a either
increased or decreased (depending on the cycle) as
the applied pressure was increased from 5 to 20-35
psi, and then remained constant at Pm a equals
1.12 to 1.15. During unloading, the ratio decreased
and eventually became equal to 0.8-0.9.
(2) Disk with teflon covering:
During initial loading the ratio increased
substantially on the first cycle to about unity,
whereas during the second cycle Pm a varied be-
tween 1.01 and 1.08. During rebound, both cycles
showed a large reduction in the ratio, which became
as low as 0.67.
3.4.3 Summary
When the pressure was applied by loading the disk in
the oedometer unit, the measured pressure was generally close
to the applied pressure (0 to 6% difference) during loading,
but during unloading the measured pressure became substan-
tially larger (15 to 35%) than the applied pressure.
In the case of the uncovered disk inside the triaxial
cell, the measured pressure was greater than the cell pres-
sure by 10 to 15% during loading at the higher presssures.
When the disk was covered with a teflon sheet, the measured
-25-
pressure was only about 3% higher. However, during un-
loading, both with and without the teflon, the measured
pressure became much less (35%) than the applied pressure.
3.5 Discussion of Test Results
Most of the test results can be explained if the
applied pressure is not uniform across the disk and trans-
ducer because of the following boundary conditions: local
arching within the soil, seating effects, and friction along
the walls of the oedometer ring, or, in the case of the tri-
axial cell, along the surface of the disk.
3.5.1 Seating and Arching Effects
On the first cycle of loading all of the tests started
out with initial measured pressures which were either much
too high or too low. This effect was probably caused by
seating effects and local arching within the soil because
the soil would not be perfectly flat and because the trans-
ducer was not perfectly aligned (see Fig. 9).
Although both tests without the teflon gave high ini-
tial pressures, while the one test with teflon gave a low
initial pressure, one is not sure whether this change is
caused by the teflon or that the seating effect can give
either a high or low value.
The fact that the ratio Pm a becomes nearer unity
with increasing applied pressure during the first cycle of
loading is probably explained by a decrease in the effects
of seating and local arching. These effects appear to nearly
disappear when the applied pressure becomes greater than about
the maximum past pressure, in this case about 20 psi. The
clay becomes more "plastic" and is capable of flowing into
voids between the soil and the disk. It should be pointed out
-26-
- -
that seating and arching effects could vary from test to
test and, of course, from soil to soil, but that these effects
should reach a minimum once the soil reaches a "plastic"
state, provided the transducer alignment and sample trimming
are within reason.
3.5.2 Frictional Effects
Even without seating effects the pressure is not uni-
form across the disk because friction is present which
causes a change in the stress distribution across the disk.
Oedometer Test
The side friction on the walls of the ring during
loading causes the pressure in the center of the disk to be
lower than the average applied pressure because part of the
applied load is taken up at the walls. The estimated change
in stress distribution is shown in Fig. 16a.
During unloading this side friction acts in the oppo-
site direction which causes the soil to form an arch with
the contact area between the soil and disk reduced. Figure
16b shows the assumed change in stress distribution. There-
fore the ratio Pm /Pa would increase and become greater than
unity during unloading.
On the second cycle of loading the initial measured
pressures were very high. This could be explained if the
side friction on rebound caused the soil surface to become
rounded. Therefore, the contact area is smaller and the
stresses are higher at the center of the top cap. The rea-
son why the test without filter paper did not show these
high initial mreasured pressures is unknown.
Triaxial Test
In this case there is no wall friction, but because
-27-
the soil wants to consolidate isotropically (have strain in
both the horizontal and vertical directions) shear stresses
are developed across the surface of the disk.
During loading these shear stresses caused the mea-
sured pressure to be higher in the center as shown in Fig.
17a, but during unloading the opposite is true, see Fig. 16b.
When the disk is covered with the teflon sheet these
shear stresses would be reduced, causing the ratio of PM ato be closer to unity. The test results showed this to be
true during loading but not during unloading. The reason
why the teflon did not help the ratio be be closer to unity
during unloading is not known.
3.6 Conclusions and Recommendations
The test results indicate that:
(1) It is difficult to apply a uniform soil pres-
sure against a plane surface.
(2) The pressure measured by the transducer cannot
be related accurately to an average pressure unless
one investigates the effects of the boundary con-
ditions.
(3) During unloading the difference between the
measured and the applied pressures is much larger
than that during loading. The cause for this large
difference is not fully understood.
(4) Seating effects are a function of the stiff-
ness of the soil relative to the applied pressure;
the care with which the transducer is placed in the
plane surface; and how the soil is placed in the
testing apparatus.
(5) The effects of seating on the first cycle of
loading are thought to be eliminated when the applied
-28-
pressure is about 1.5 times the maximum past pressure
of the soil.
(6) The stress distribution across the top stone
in an oedometer unit is thought to be close to uniform
when the soil is normally consolidated or being re-
loaded, but far from uniform during unloading.
(7) The placement of a thin sheet of teflon across
the surface of the transducer and the plane surface
apparently does not affect the accuracy with which
the transducer will measure the soil pressure.
(8) A flat face rigid pressure transducer, as
used in this investigation, probably measures
accurately the soil pressure which acts across and
directly surrounding the transducer once seating
effects are eliminated.
Further testing is needed to study seating effects,
and how different boundary conditions affect the measured
and applied pressure. Although all of these studies would
not be directly related to the measurement of K0 , they would
be helpful in understanding how uniform or non-uniform the
applied stresses are in different types of testing equipment.
Finally, a testing program is required to study the
effects of soil moving across the transducer's face, as
occurs in the K cell. In this case any protrusion or re-
cession of the transducer could greatly affect the mea-
surements. However, a sheet of teflon across the plane sur-
face would help to eliminate large errors.
-29-
-~ -
Chapter 4
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
A K cell has been developed in which the lateral
pressure is measured by an electrical pressure transducer.
Test results on remolded BBC indicate that K in the nor-0
mally consolidated range is 0.48, which is in good agree-
ment with other K data on similar BBC. In the overconsoli-0
dated range, K increases with increasing O.C.R. and becomes
greater than one at an O.C.R. of about four.
A testing program was initiated to see if this type
of transducer would measure the soil pressure acting across
its face and the area directly surrounding it with a high
degree of accuracy. This program consisted of applying
pressure to a thin soil cylinder with one face covered by
a stainless steel disk which had a transducer inserted in
its center. The soil pressure recorded by the transducer
indicated that the applied soil pressure was not uniform
across the stainless steel disk. But most of the transducer's
readings seemed reasonable because the systems used to apply
this soil pressure had inherent boundary conditions which
would cause this pressure to be non-uniform. Therefore, it
is the opinion of the author that the transducer measures
the soil pressure directly surrounding the transducer with a
higher degree of accuracy than the assumption that the soil
pressure on the disk is uniform. This may never be proven
since it is next to impossible to apply a truly known soil
pressure across a plane surface with a transducer in it.
There are three basic problems when using this type of
K cell. First, there is the problem of rigidity of the cell
and transducer. Test results by others suggest that the trans-
ducer is rigid enough, and as previously discussed (Section
-30-
(2.7) it was concluded that, providing the wall strain is
less than 5 x 10 -, the value of K would not be affected by
this small amount of strain. However, this number is an
engineering approximation which needs further investigation.
Secondly, the main problem with wall friction is most
likely not how it influences the performance of the trans-
ducer but rather how this friction causes the horizontal
stress to deviate from the true K value. The author pro-
poses that this deviation is caused by two factors:
(1) Wall friction negates the assumption that the
normal and horizontal stresses are principal stresses.
(2) Wall friction affects the uniformity of applied
stresses along the top and bottom of the sample, which
must also affect the normal stress applied and mea-
sured against the walls of the K cell.
To correct for item (1) the author proposes the method
outlined in Fig. 8. For item (2), no correction is proposed
but two general statements can be made based on the data ob-
tained from placement of the transducer in the top cap of
an oedometer unit.
(1) The normal stress on the walls is probably not
affected very much when the soil is normally con-
solidated since the stress on the top cap remained
fairly uniform, e.g., about 5% deviation.
(2) The normal stress on the walls could be
greatly affected when the soil is highly overconsoli-
dated since the stress on the top cap was not even
close to uniform, e.g., 15 to 35% deviation.
In any case further investigation, as pointed out in Section
2.7, is required to develop a better understanding of the
problem.
-31-
-1
Thirdly, since there is soil movement across the trans-
ducer's face, due to the soil being consolidated, the ques-
tion arises: does this affect the transducer measurements?
This problem has not been investigated, but providing the
transducer is flush with the plane surface or covered with a
thin teflon sheet, it is believed that there should not be
any significant amount of error.
In conclusion, two basic questions have to be asked
and answered relative to the future development and use of
this type of K cell.
One: Is this type of K cell better than or equal to
other types of K cells, such as an oedometer unit in which
the hoop strain of the confining ring is measured to de-
rive the lateral stress, and an oedometer unit similar to
the one developed by Hendron (1963), and triaxial tests
such as developed by Jackson (1963) or Bishop and Henkel
(1962)?
In the triaxial type K cells the wall friction is
eliminated, which is a distinct advantage, but there are
three major disadvantages. First, it is more difficult to
run and requires either constant attention or elaborate
automation. Secondly, there is continual lateral movements
of the soil sample, i.e., relaxation, then compression. Al-
though these movements can be small (diameter change of about
3 x 10~4 inches) they could cause considerable errors when
the sample is overconsolidated since there would be a ten-
dency to get a high reading when recompressing the sample
by this amount because the soil is "rigid" compared to the
confining pressure. In the normally consolidated range
this should not be a major problem since the soil is in a
"plastic" state. Thirdly, Bishop (1958) pointed out that
in this type of test it is critical that the specimen be
-32-
honogenous regarding its stress-strain characteristics and
that the pore pressure should be uniform throughout the
specimen.
The other types of oedometer units would have the
same problem with wall friction. Hendron's (1963) unit has
the advantage that it can go to higher pressures without
losing sensitivity in the low pressure range, that it mea-
sures an average pressure, not just a pressure at one point,
and that it has a symmetrical shape. Its disadvantages are
that it is probably more difficult to operate and is cer-
tainly more expensive to build.
This brief discussion leads to the conclusion that a
K cell using a transducer has the advantage of being sim-
ple, but the results are affected to an unknown degree by
wall friction. Conversely, the triaxial K cell has the
advantage of no side friction, but the relaxation-recom-
pression and non-uniform pore pressure dissipation can also
affect the results and the test is difficult to perform.
Two: Is it worth the effort to perfect this type of
K cell by developing a better understanding of how wall
friction and/or wall deflection affects the measured value
of K ? The answer depends upon the usefulness of K values
to the soil engineer and whether or not this research yields
additional insight into other problems in soil mechanics.
K is usually determined for:
(1) the evaluation of Poisson's ratio and earth
pressures on buried rigid structures.
(2) laboratory shear strength determinations in
which the soil should be anisotropically consolidated
before shear to represent in situ strength properties.
(3) aiding the soil engineer in his endeavor to
understand soil behavior.
-33-
These measurements are often required but small deviations
in K generally have a minor effect compared with the over-
all engineering problem. As pointed out, in the normally
consolidated range this and other K cells measure K within
a reasonable range but in the overconsolidated range this
type and other K cells most likely have the largest and
unknown errors. Therefore, in the normally consolidated
range further investigation into wall friction, etc., is
not required, but if good K values are to be determined in
the overconsolidated range further investigation is needed.
Furthermore, this research would lead to a better understand-
ing of wall friction, its detrimental effects on consolidation
and direct shear tests, and a better understanding of the
measurements of earth pressures against a retaining surface.
-34-
Chapter 5
REFERENCES
Bishop, A. W. (1958), "Test Requirements for Measuring theCoefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest," Proceedings,Brussels Conference on Earth Pressure Problems, Vol.I, p. 2.
Bishop, A. W. and Henkel, D. J. (1962), "The Measurementof Soil Properties in the Triaxial Test," Edward Arnal,London.
Brooker, E. W. and Ireland, H. 0. (1965), "Earth Pressuresat Rest Related to Stress History," Canadian Geo-technical Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1.
Hendren, A. J. Jr. (1963), "The Behavior of Sand in One-
Dimensional Compression," Ph.D. Thesis, University ofIllinois, Urbana, Illinois.
Henkel, D. J. and Sowa, V. A. (1963), "The Influence of
Stress History on the Stress Paths Followed in Un-
drained Triaxial Tests," Laboratory Shear Testing of
Soils, ASTM Special Technical Publication No. 361,
pp. 280-292.
Jackson, W. T. (1963), "Stress Paths and Strains in a
Saturated Clay," Master's Thesis, M.I.T., Unpublished,Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jaky, J. (1948), "Pressure in Silos," Proceedings, Second
International Conference on Soil Mechanics andFoundations, Rotterdam, Vol. 1, pp. 103-107.
Ladd, C. C. (1965), "Stress-Strain Behavior of Anisotro-pically Consolidated Clays During Undrained Shear,"
Proceedings, Sixth International Conference on Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, Vol.
I, p. 282.
Lambe, T. W. (1951), "Soil Testing for Engineers," JohnWiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
Lambe, T. W. (1964), "Methods of Estimating Settlement,"
Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division,
ASCE, Vol. 90, No. SM5, Proc. Paper 4060, September,
1964.
-35-
Lambe, T. W. and Martin, R. T. (1953), "Composition and
Engineering Properties of Soil," Proceedings ofThirty-Second Annual Meeting of the Highway ResearchBoard, January.
M.I.T. (1960), "Pore Pressure Measurements during Transient
Loading," The Response of Soils to Dynamic Loadings,Report No. 5, Dept. of Civil Engineering, November.
M.I.T. (1961), "Effects of Rate of Strain on Stress-StrainBehavior of Saturated Soils," The Response of Soil toDynamic Loadings, Report No. 6, Dept. of Civil Engi-neering, April.
M.I.T. (1963), "Effective Stress versus Strength: Saturated
Fat Clay," The Response of Soil to Dynamic Loadings,Report No. 16, Dept. of Civil Engineering, April.
M.I.T. (1963), "Engineering Behavior of Partially SaturatedSoils," Phase Report No. 1, Department of Civil Engi-neering, May.
Simons, N. E. (1958) Discussion on: General Theory of Earth
Pressure. Proceedings, Brussels Conference on Earth
Pressure Problems, Vol. 3, pp. 50-53.
Stevens, S. F. (1953), "Effects of Times of Consolidation and
Rebound on the Shearing Strength of Clay," M.S. Thesis,M.I.T., Unpublished.
Taylor, D. W. (1942), "Research on the Consolidation of
Clays," Department of Civil and Sanitary Engineering,M.I.T., Serial No. 82.
Trollope, D. H. and Lee, I. K. (1961), "The Measurement of
Soil Pressures," Proceedings, Fifth International Con-ference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,Vol. II, Paris.
-36-
TA5LE I
COMPO SITIOA/ ANP EANG?/EEPIN& PROPERTIES
OF oosToN 81e CLAY
MnerQ/ogc Composition C/d Sf1'fct;n dh
Il/ite - f5 Yo to 70Y Ziquid Lio/t 45-Y
Quartj - 20 %to 340 % I/'o;c lati/f 22%
Ck/orite - sometlwe5 preweNt Perceift w/ils 2 0c1*4rors- 50%
Refertetcos :- lreveo.4, S.f* M/f:5) 5peCille PreW/Ity - e 77z a 01g1,70rhe, 7. fe iyooo NX,.r., (1!5)
Compref ioll Index Cc -d-34
Coeffivem' of COKfol//aoit - 2= x ia ~' 2 /sac.
Fr c fioni 0P9/e - 5ee fab/e 7
TYPICAL CALI1Be4TI2AI OF PRE55/PETABLE IT TRANSDUCER - 11,5/NG V TVM VOL rME TER
*1 I I I I IAPL EDPA fSORS(Pvi i
/0
20
50
S
MV
0
5
/0
/5
20
20
25
25
30
35
*0
#5
50
55
'5.
70
75
80
85
85
90
A MV
f St
573
7ff
z7/.35
fIt
/7/8
/8.00
ZO 7
E41MV
0
0.9/
/ 78
2.6 '
3.43
0.9/
087
0.89
086
0.87
0.92
0.8(0
0.9/
0.88
0.9/
0.9
0.02
0.890.8By
0.900 fo
Ae. - 5.66 - psi /AMV ; psi - 566 - /HV
TI /e'4MIMV $CA Lf
5,35
(P./s
70*
8.8/
972
/0. 59
// 47
/2.564
/f/8
If 607
0
5*9(46)
51.2
5,9
~51 z
.5-
569
567
5"a
51,8
5 67
5.465' ,
4-
ha
'kBi
ti I
Lij
04:
Nl
mmml --- I
TA5LE ll TYPICAL CALIBRATION OF PMF'EP/6/AL VOL TMETrF
APPLIED MV AMV AMVPRE $RE 5 5 ps/(pSi)
0
5'
/0
/5.
20
Zs'
30
35
*0
*5
5*0
60
70
80
90
(100
/20
/40
/60
/0
200
-3.970
f 70Z
555 7
6.4/4-
7.Z78
8./45
ys6f
/0. 7Z#
/68
/2. *0
/5.68
2/.088
2*. 550
2797f*
3/ 4-5Z
5a. T.6
0.$85
0.8 %t
0.957
0-869-
0.5 7
0.857
0.9% Z
.0 1
/.826
.73,
:113.114
3.0f58
3.3/
3.$F3
/p r /(</A V)Vo
KxzApsi Vo /4MV
KS (5)1t.- 0)/(0.06 /4) - 3t I
N lv : n- /0- 6. 000
0.8 IL
0.951
0.857
08f0
0.858
.858
M.A
TZANA15/E9 95IN6
eEN/L r5 OF Ko TET ON e. CtF v bk f. C0 . /. ,/0
Kg /cWa *,9/cmz ctb-,PX. ( % )WBv
8
4
I
/4
2
'/9
/
It
10
8
6
I
O 00*3
0.-04*
0-/53
0-4/8
0.3ftb
'.9/
.3.89
2.f50
.9z5
0.g#5-
0.6*0
A-631f
/. 25
4.01
5.74
5- 5
T- 03
45"
3.55
0.066
0. Zil
0. 104
0.4/b
0.472
0.4*6
0.13-0.725'
0. f62
/.24
/6f
2.2o
/.24
0. 09
0.5/4
0. 77
0- 543
0. b*9
0.-73
0- 8f6
/
/6
2
4
/4
Jz
/ ~
/2
3
0436
/- 4z
2.75
.76
/0.5*
/4-S
/4.57
/4.25'
/1.4*
/2.33
/3.56
/3.74
/i-55
/6.27
/6-8/
/6.6*
I - MEMN
TABLE HV
TANLE a CONTrnUAED
XC2 AfH/H0
Ag /cow kg /cV K Qv Max (4og)
2 2.35 /./65 6 /6.27I~ 1*3 43 '
oq-q6 /.pea /5.4
'4 0.72. 5o
0-575 . pi 62
0 0.252 -- - ; 4
-1
wh7
TABL E 1Z TYPI CA L VA LIE5FOR B. C.
OF FRICT ONA AGL E
Ladd (/945
(2) From c<ackoti (/73)
CItUC - CotvSo/idated- Utc 'idrre' tri4/d/with /sotropic cco1s501,af/ofl
CK0/C- A5 aove, b4t wifth K0 conso/,dafian
te5tcC - Corgo/idfated - draiied trtaxia//
TYPE OF VALUE OF 4 DE6PEES
TE3TAF -- T A fx.rAt (- /r wo (x.,
PC 2.5C WC 2 75* 32.7
c ff~ c z 65 13.0N
CDC 2 7./
(I) From
Co*1pf~55/d# ttt
TA&LE JU501L PRE1UE IN CON0 IDA TIDN UNIT (a) wIr# FIL TE2 PAPER
Pa Pm Pm-.Pa Pml,/f /E P4 Pm Pm- j P/P iE
psi psi psi p si Psi PSi
0
3.56
6.719
/0.0/
/319
/6-97
20. z
Z7. 0
35.7
4f 2
50.4
". 0
67f5
35.7
./.57
-. if
zio
0
S. r55
f 3
A.46
/5f. t
/.f3 7
/ f/ 7
X.3
11.3
.50.9
Of
/f./
7". 55
/9.77
/f
20.4
271
+0.525
+'.2*
+'0.
.No-
-0.4
+0./
~'0.,5
-0./f
-03.1+150
"5.3
tz. 90
Pt 0.55Ov 0. 3/
0-063
+0..5
1'-W 0
4- 10
/4009
. f f5
O-f ff
/. 012
.00/
/ 0/
0.996A/ 990. OAP/
I/
3.* A
23.0
8.0
0.7
0.1
-0.5
0./
0./1
-0.0
-o.f
.95
/5.1
/72
/0.5
6./
I.'
3.1
fi. 5
?2.7
/a7
/01.1
75-.9
sp95
50.55
12./i
35.7
25.13
*22
0
J I i-i -
3 3. y
5$./414f
7f 55
83.0
/06.5
/08.2
/Oz.3
52.4
753
55.4
*1.6
3/os
/1.3
//.60
5-75"
0. If
-- 25
-o.9
-0.f0
-1.2
-2.4
-2.9
-2.6
+'1.2
+3.3
+'.5
+"75
5.-5/
-2.57
+/.53
-007
0.994
0.987
0.977
0.986
/.0//
/-037
/. 06A
/.05
/./3z
/. /17'
A.321
/.155*.234
/.229
1.321
/. 3&/
4-.
-0-6
-f
-2.8
-2.5
-2.8
-2.5
3.7
6.2
8.tw
/'
/3.2
25.*
XE.,
32.4
31-
.34./
TA5L E .r CoN rINulE : (b) w/r#our f/L r PAPre
e At &/4 A- % Epsi psi IpsiI
0
f 7z
eis 5
53.7
42.15
.5-f
6745
75.
159
/5.i
/01.7
8/f
54-
33.7
/.1
4.xf-
0.fl
/6.1
Z4.2
3z#7
401.
65.0
1/01'
1,5
4541
/05./1
I//I./
/217
/#55
/SZ. /
/22.0
/of 71
955
4A.4
fg-.6
/. W
0.97*
4.941
o.961
0.9*6
1.9*/
0.99/
oo.ff
0460
P.0 f
0.106
/./f'
/.2/
.2 5,
/. 24I I h
*0.02
- 0.0/
-0.59
- /. 9S
-. 45
-1/.9
-3.65
-405
-5.0
-55
_~7-0.3*
-Z.6
-'.9
-IL
-5.5
-2.5
*1.6
"/5.25
+ //./5
'9.7f
#9-09f
0
-2.4
-3.5
-3.5
-#0
-5*
-5.5
-5-9
-59f
-5.9
-5.9
-59
-5.'
-55
- .b
#3.3
8.3
li. 0
If.S
Ai-0
5.8
TA B L f2SOIL PkES5IUPE k[5UL T5 IN TIAYAL CELL WITH01T TEFLO
Pa Pi Pn-Pa Pm/P4 %E I Pa J p m p - Pw- /& %psi PS/' p 1si psi psi psi
/0
/5
20
25
50
.5
10
#5
50
40
50
20
/5
/0
5:
0
5
/0
'5-
*0
*5
50
5
40a
0
/5./1
20-."
26.0
30.5
34.8
50-5
'5.7
52.2
22.7
/f:17
4.05
-0.50
5:2f
,0.67
/6.VI-
23.0
5*8
10.5-
49-1
+5./S
15-95~
.5-5
"4.5
+5. f
"45
#2.2
+2.7
-0-05
-0.-95
#0.27
+0.69
+/.9*
+6.9
1-5/
/30
1.2/2
1.16
/-/
1./2/
///'
/072
1.153
0.996
0.1/75
/-055
/0hi
/./.5
I. /5-
/147
4-5
50
60
70
0
70
60
5,0
40
50
20
/0
b5.0
59.6
50.0
2/ Z
/6.0
2.09
/0.8
/1.8
// 2
72
'3.3
-0-
-8. 25
-/9.0
/3.0
/5-0
/5/
/6.1
/5:8
/4.7
52.0
576
d~s 0
80.0
91.0
675
558
3/.
200
9./7
.f5/8
1'70
+76*-el
10.0-9f//-. 0
+'58
-0.85
- 0.5/5
L 3 L a a __________
1.1/5-3
1. /55
1.1-3
/. /17
.9/
g.-9/7
/5.6
'5 3
/3.3
/13s
/5.9
//.8
// 7
/0.0
6.0
0
-5.3
0
TA &L E ESOIL PRES.U5E eLSUL T I N TRIAXIA L CELL WITH TEFLON
pa Pm too P/s E Pa Cm -/psj psi psi p _ __ psi psi 'Pi psi
0
5
/0
/5
fo
40
50
55
40
45
50
/0
.50
20
/JE
30
5f
/0
/5
20
5
5
#0
50
1./ 4l8.5#
/4./6
/9L.68
245/
2f./Z
5502
*0.15
f 7fIfy./49f 1
279?4
trl.1 0
f6/55
-- z
5.65
- L.6
-0.8
-O.02
?0. 0f
,0 0-15
-0.2/
-0.86
-2+
-o.S7
,'07/
-/.29
+1.4 1
+-i.+
+'o.BI-
60
70
70
go
521
YO30
20
/0
0
W.0 0
740.7,0
8/.4
7/.5:7
60.5/
49*0e
3&4/
74'
5.35
-/. 08
to.79
tO.5/
-0.20
- f9-2.53
- 2.58
-2.54
-2.65
/.0/8
1. 020
1.008
o.9?6
0. 766
0.9/6
0.97/
-67
a & a i a a i a a
7'/.4
"1.8
-0.9
-'4
-/2.9
-2Sf
-35.0
. C2
0. 9 v
".951
0.98
0.97/
0.97
/.0/0.070
0.991
0.93
0.977
0.73/
0.755
Of 2
1015-
/0/0
/.0*24
I. 050
/ 035
/. 0.59
/-037
/.033
. /O-
V - - - EMIR
-57.3-
-17-/.51--2.9
-30.4
-0.6
-. 7
-2-.5
-/2.0
-'1.0
v'5. 0
3
"3.?
#3.7
"/5
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTIONFOR 0OTON BLUE CLAY
MIT SAND SILT CLAYCLASSFICATION COARSE MEDIUM FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE COARSE MEDIUMJ FINE
__ * _ ___ __ _ _____
90--
so --T7O
S 60
050
4c:40
20--z1530-
10 -
0 --10 0.OOI0.01
IN MM0.0001
FIG. I
0.1DIAMETER
1.0
CRO5:5-.OYE, DAR FOR LOA D/A/
CELL
* POLO~5 %t&WE,
.5 ______________ a
P~OOP Sr OME
py4TFa~,4f 5CA LE
FY 1 0 ce//
/
VIALSu'ppolrT
I ITj..
PIA
Li
Fi'
I I I I I
Fig.5.
~, ~I I
Voume~tric
4-
7fl1 I.&
045 to0 2 4,
5traioi V5 Le 09 Col/IdfisNf for 001Mto ffl e/oy
V0 K root
P Avw 4At~ Pwr fy
U Trf/.w ir~,vy
~1
L
a /0
Vertical
41-
IB
OzI2
-2.5,0
2. .7fr tpsv
/81
,k, leow~'tress
I
Fi. 4 Vsrt'io/ 5rM0 v* /7Dr'46fv4/ .tri# K(0 Test 4v go too A/ue C/ny
S,=0#
R7 CYCL E0 /adh Yf
S oadi9
.$EC4WD CYCLE0oirtwkg
* IIN/Cadhif
-
/7/
IlLI
'7
I- 0I I
/ 2
L/
7 ___
If
Meaurwd Harip&nta/ Stfou; kt/cmg
/2eq
N'~ /0
I~4b
I~1
9
'7
4
3
2
bE
0 4 5
i I
I I
A I!I - I - mmmi - im
_____________________________________ ~ i~ ~1....F1q 5 Coefficict sf Orft/ " RAO 4t
cot " OrereI5'hfi n uofor Ofro# 3/e Cley
_______________________________________________ i
x -00
p d
/
iii IA 30 450O60 M 0 I f 3 4 5 7' 1/
C . i w /IF,
x0
for uv -for yp - /m
5
it
lb
ki
2
I
0
_ I-
At ICR-/ K 048
I I
LWTTZ OIL. LAAAGS
COLLECTION: COLLAR VAIE SAN
-~TO oz
0-RiVO~T Imu iaoic HAI
CL) (LITI
//EDD AII
TOP F pgnl GU I1T iinvoM
Um~ ~ ~ DAMSc A.
CIA:ii 0
TOP O p~c~g ~ ~2'*1D
~'E(o FIL OL
TU(M )
rw'fLWOR JA
P.Mu).p. CJ. TSPL400
mmtU
wI (WI1
Tr. v3 OIL
JAY~r IIIJE?1
00m (m:,)
3wZ CW&W (mh)
CW COLLAR PLTE (MT)
"UL m&L
.c.
FIG. A ?Uu CES L 1
-52-
II
r~lfIVA AdW A" EwW* SACO,P~blvam~AS c.mp~/E7r *a.rAtf IM Nt : ~ //IA&A" orA.
smav ufvr )At~e~ uxxs &jrMr
ITAAr "W T
VALU
I
oston 5/u . Clay. r. A /37 K, Celf
Chicaqo Cloy, Pr /0.5 (Sowoker -f re/and, /965)
Goove Lake Roave, r w /. f (ropet I./wle.,V5)
WaE/d C/oy, RZ. - 2# ('eo*e/ ( Soa, /65)
iee/d C/oy, Ar. v 20. % (rw*er f re/eod, /f65)
Fif 7 , v 0 CR for .5eVera
/(p8.C.R. a/
4-
3/
///
p/
/
c kwm o crlf
-o
/ ay4
32 64-
3.0 1-
-- 0--
--- 0---
2.0
()
w
'.
to
0
0I 2
Fil. d ffect of .5/dc frictio# ow 1lte of K4
I -
r-i
r.Msdi
KO
Yb 1F" t& a
tv ff,I
5 t 4
m tan )
measured 4
"Trqg"a- / 0 042
-,p. Nrma/ 5,'ress - 5~
~1
5., / E/igmvn ,-|*vje Opp
.. _t e
E:1
WherI& - MeS.* wrd Sa
vw App/i .4 At'wss
S *rL , a X fo p i Mis ex OMp/4 4/c- r - 31. 2 Meesurda Siorss!Sei f mwII -D
1%
4%
Wall of Ko Cel
Pric '
IFI.Ij
F/9 9 O/sk for Ca/ibratio# of TrMdaer
0DE rA IL A
-- Z735I -t
o - -0. 75l
3rA/wLE 5ssrrEa.
~~ooo" 000"
K 7-
r1f. /0
L~9J LJ
ZOAPINS CA-05,5-OVER 3A1
5~s. pI*j
2.75'b~4 e
,- 7bov
.. ~14 .g44g~0w.v
.5rp SzA0o OgDwqwrate
1*Z7777,7 // /!7
751no
Thz IONI
Oedu#,cter I/fi with risfMUCer
i
L- I
I i
I I
I
Trxia /
To FRE551viYT E S5A E /I2 42
/ j
T17
Ce// with ra;ducer
ri]. 7LIicz~
N61,-ChL ED
LA TEX
I/-
ThRAxiWi T,
3 LAYERF/LI. M PA
5oii
AL CELLWAnTE
PRAINA OELINE
55 P/1A:
P15k,
TRANSDWCER
Q-4?
Fi. / /
Flo. /l Preare 5yotem Aor Trid)x/6/ Ce"'
AmK
4ERIE, 40 Ns'AAbArnc Ai R W69 1.Aroc
WArE
7VTNVO
25 orr-2F/ fl/as ro/Alm
7k/AXIALc*Awl,
w
4
60 o 100 It
4 -App//sd Prwsjwr. ;m
Fi /5 A's'/fs of domcer Tw- ZOtiO AlPm/Pa sPq
A -- o i gt /0q4Idv-. /M*: Ui/OfdiI 9
wv,' filftr pdp*rI-- i~e 0 AQtv
a --- A 3pd /oAdif
-9
1.5
to
1.0
0 ,to 40 160
KA# /4 feou/fs of Trdxi / ist widkuf 7f/low
Rdti If Pm /Pa V$ P#-- 4
-st cycle
/0secod cyc/e
I
I2 cydt
-K~
/57' ct/.
/1A
I.
- 4 a f~50/
'p
i~W0gr in psi
- U ~
N
-
1+.
LT1
I.'
Le
00.
A
90
I
I
k
0 I0 ,to 50 40 60 10 80
p- Applied PrWSSmre in *As;
ILi5 / 2ft/fT t r/fxi(/ Test Wj Tji
At#$ of At/Re r% A
1.03
2, ycle a.O mldem
0.7
AI
Fig. /6 Effect of Frdioi ow/,, Ctdo neter
Loading ~
mEA~V4sc - % P/FPERENCFr - 35/ Pl,'/rCERWCXsOszg 4CrTUAL P15r'lvTrrTON
AveRA6&P,/A
r< 1
0 7~eAAf* pL-'~ E~. b
-62-
Sfrels pisitributionTed.s
1si
R
F4g /7 fifect- of fr/Ic tn# on 5r5Triaxial
(a) Loud,,,9q
Awmrv~ AcTLJA.
ei1L Aecost/Rec
(&,) 14vodiP79
5rcesseS
/ //LJ/ / I]
PI%- ~/ V! // N71RAA/ APV'Ce f
Cai-'- /*as suqc
A65ufiff A4rUAL
plstnpatlotl
5;#gAe
wl
Appendix A
PREPARATION OF BOSTON BLUE CLAY
The Boston Blue Clay (BBC) used in this investigation
was obtiined from the M.I.T. campus during construction of
the Materials Building pile foundation in September, 1963.
The soil was removed from a auger which had obtained soil
from a depth of between about 40 to 90 feet.
The clay was air dried and ground up by the Sturte-
vant Mill Co., Boston, Mass., in an air swept pulver mill
with a dust bag collector. A grinder was used to break up
the chunks so that 100% would pass through a U.S. Standard
No. 100 sieve. The one problem encountered with this pro-
cedure arose from the fact that the augered clay contained
rocks and/or lumps of shale which could not be completely
removed prior to grinding and were therefore ground up with
the clay.
The air dried ground clay was formed into a slurry
and consolidated in the large oedometer shown in Fig. A-l
using the procedures described below in the M.I.T. Soils
Laboratory.
Ten kilograms of ground clay are added to 15 liters
of demineralized water with a salt content of 16 g/liter.
The salt is added to help make the soil structure similar
to the in situ clay and to cause flocculation. The soil is
added while the water is being stirred by a very high speed
mixer in a 40 liter pyrex container. After mixing for about
an hour, the slurry is allowed to settle overnight. It is
then remixed and poured through a U.S. Standard No. 200
sieve into another container. The slurry is again remixed
and allowed to settle for a few days. After syphoning off
the clear water, the denser slurry is remixed and poured
into a 5 gallon metal container where it is heated while
-64-
stirring to help remove trapped air. After the temperature
has reached about 70 0 C the slurry is added slowly to the
large consolidometer base unit with a 3-foot lucite chamber,
as shown in Fig. A-2. The chamber and consolidometer unit
was under a vacuum of about 75 cm of mercury before the
slurry was added. During addition of the soil, the rate of
soil input is varied to keep the vacuum greater than 73 cm
of mercury. The process takes about one hour.
After the slurry is placed, a partial (<4" Hg) vacuum
is applied to the bottom drainage valve in order to consoli-
date the slurry so that its height will fall below the top
of the base unit. The lucite chamber is then removed and
the piston put in place after applying a slight vacuum to
the piston's drainage lead. Finally, when the top of the
piston support is below the top of the confining ring, water
repellent transformer oil is added, the cover is attached
and pressure is applied in the following increments: 0.5,2
1, 1.5 kg/cm . A plot of dial change vs. log time is made
to ensure that each increment reaches 100% primary consoli-
dation before the increment is changed.
2Following consolidation at 1.5 kg/cm for not less
than 5 days, the soil cake (9.5 in. in diameter by about
5.5 in. high) is extruded and cut into eight half-moon
chunks with a height of about 1-1/4 in. These chunks are
stored in water repellent transformer oil (Mobilect No. 33)
until used for testing.
Samples prepared in this manner had an average water
content of 32%, a void ratio of 0.93, and a degree of satur-
ation of about 99%. Experience has shown that the soil does
not lose a significant amount of water during storage in
the transformer oil.
-65-
Top
MainHoldingRod(4 Used)
Porous Stan
Porous Ston
Stainless Steel Shaft
Aluminum Pocking Nut
Aluminum Bushing Holder
Teflon Packing
Drain -Thompson Ball Bushing
To Oil-Nitrogen Accumulator
Aluminum Cover0" Ring Seal
-+-- ----- Oi I---- Extrusion Rod (3 Used)
Aluminum 0-"UO" Ring Seal
- ...--- Lucite Piston
Bonded Teflon
"D. Shelby.TubingSoi
Lucite Base Piston
"O' Ring Seal
- -Bottom Drain
Aluminum Base
Note: To extrude, relieve pressure, invert consolidometer ;remove main holding rods and tighten extrusion rods.Reapply light pressure sufficient to extrude.
FIGURE A-1 SELF-EXTRUDING CONSOLIDOMETER
-65-
Soil Slurry introduced Here
--- To Vocuum Pump
-e 3*ft Lucite Deoiringcolumn
\ 0
000
I000
000 Io
0000
000
Soil Slurry
//0
~iY II
Consolidometer
FIGURE A-2 METHOD OF SLURRY PLACEMENT
n7-
I-
,-101
Appendix B
PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS
B.l Pressure Transducers and Associate Instrumentation
B.l.1 Design of Gauge
The electrical pressure transducer employed in this
research (Model APT 25) is commercially available from Dyn-
isco, Division of American Brake Shoe Company, Cambridge,
Mass. This "Dynisco" gauge consists of a four-active arm
unbonded strain gauge bridge which senses the deflection of
a small rigid diaphragm (see Fig. B-l).
It has an accuracy of 0.25 per cent of its full scale
output and exhibits a maximum nonlinearity and hysteresis
of less than 0.50% of its full scale output. It is tempera-
ture compensated between the range of -65 to +300*F with a
maximum drift of 2% F.S./1000 F. When it is excited by a low
D.C. voltage (6 volts) the gauge has an output proportional
to the pressure exerted on the diaphragm. At full pressure
the output is about 25 to 50 millivolts (M.I.T. 1960 and
M.I.T. 1961).
These gauges are extremely rigid. The diaphragm de-
flection is about 3.5 x 10~4 in. at full-rated pressure.
The deflection of the diaphragm is a number quoted by Dyn-
isco.
B.l.2 Related Electrical Equipment
(1) Voltage Source
The voltage source for the transducer was a standard
6 volt wet cell battery obtained from Sears and Roebuck Co.
(2) Voltage Measuring Equipment
Three different types of voltmeters were used to
-68-
measure the millivolt (MV) output of the transducer.
The first one was a vacuum tube voltmeter (VTM) Model
1477 manufactured by Daystrom, Inc., Weston Instrument Di-
vision, Newark, New Jersey. This voltmeter can measure
voltages from zero to 1,000 MV on the following MV scales -
0 to 2, to 5, to 10, to 20, to 50, to 100, and to 1000 and
has a 1% accuracy of the reading on each scale.
The second type used was a manual digital type volt-
meter manufactured by Keithley Instrument Inc. This 5 di-
gital voltmeter, model 6060T, can measure voltages from 0
to 500 volts with a sensitivity of 0.01 MV on the most sen-
sitive range and an accuracy of 0.02% or 20 microvolts,
whichever is larger.
The third type used was a portable manual digital
type voltmeter manufactured by Electro Scientific Industries.
This 5 digital voltmeter model 300 can measure voltages
from 0 to 511.10 volts in five ranges with a maximum sensi-
tivity of one microvolt on the most sensitive range. The
accuracy is 0.02% of the reading or one increment on the
most sensitive decode switch.
B.2 Calibration of Pressure Transducers
B.2.1 General
In general the calibration involves establishing a
relationship between applied pressure, measured output vol-
tage, and excitation voltage. This relationship should in-
clude the excitation voltage because during long term tests,
i.e., lasting more than a day, the battery voltage can change
enough to cause an appreciable error.
There are two different procedures for obtaining this
relationship, which depend upon the type of voltmeter used.
-69-
In both cases the battery excitation voltage of about 6 volts
is connected to the circuit for at least 2 hours before the
calibration is started. Tests have shown that the voltage
changes with time after the battery is connected to the
transducer, but this change becomes minor after about 2
hours. This effect is shown in Fig. B-2.
The applied pressure is supplied by a dead weight
gauge tester which has an accuracy of 0.1% of the applied
pressure. The gauge tester, model ML 23-1, is manufactured
by Chandler Engineering Co., Tulsa, Oklahoma.
B.2.2 Calibration when Excitation Voltage is
Directly Measured
Since the digital voltmeter can measure the excitation
voltage directly with a high degree of accuracy, the follow-
ing equation can be used to establish a calibration constant
(gauge factor = K) for the relation among applied pressure,
excitation voltage, and output voltage, and to determine
unknown pressures once K is found.
mV mvP - PV [ m _ 0] K
e 0
where:
P = unknown pressure
P0 = known pressure (usually zero at start of test)
mVm = measured millivolts at new pressure
mV0 = measured millivolts at known pressure
Ve = measured excitation voltage at unknown
pressure
V = measured excitation voltage at known pressure
K = gauge factor derived during calibration where
changes in pressures are known
-70-
V0K = -APressure
Note: V = Ve since the voltage source does not
change during the short period required to
calibrate the transducer.
By using this equation and procedure, measured pres-
sures during tests lasting over a long period will be ex-
tremely accurate because excitation voltage changes can be
accounted for and the measuring equipment is more accurate
than the transducer.
B.2.3 Calibration when Excitation Voltage is Indi-
rectly Measured
When the Weston voltmeter is used another procedure
has to be used to take into account any voltage changes
because this meter cannot measure the excitation voltage
directly, as in-the case of the digital voltmeter. The
procedure used is based on the fact that when a resistor is
added across one of the four active strain gauges making up
the bridge circuit, the circuit's output voltage changes
(see Fig. B-1). The amount of this voltage change depends
on the value of the added resistance, the characteristics
of the transducer, and the excitation voltage.
Therefore, a resistor can be chosen which would
give a change in output voltage equal b the output voltage
change that takes place when a certain pressure is applied
to the transducer.
The calibration procedure is as follows:
(a) Resistors are chosen which give a voltage
change of about 75% full scale on each scale that
will be used.
(b) After the circuit has warmed up for 2 hours,
-71-
-U
the voltage changes are determined for different
known applied pressure changes at the unknown ex-
citation voltage of about 6 volts.
(c) During the above, but between pressure in-
crements, the voltage change due to adding the
calibration resistors to one arm of the circuit is
measured.
(d) From the mV change/psi (from part b) and the
mV change for the resistor (from part c), one can
determine the equivalent value of the resistor in
psi.
After the establishment of an equivalent psi for each
resistor the transducer is calibrated for any desired exci-
tation voltage.
The equation expressing the transducer electrical
output in terms of pressure has the following form:
K
P - P = (mV - mV ) (Weston Voltmeter)o m 1 AmVs
where:
mVm = millivolts measured at new pressure
mV = millivolts measured prior to change in
pressure
AmVs = change in millivolts due to adding a cali-
bration resistor
K = equivalent psi of calibration resistor
determined during calibration
P = new or unknown pressure
P0 = pressure at mV1 reading (usually zero)
or pressure before new increment of loading
The equation takes into account the change in exci-
tation voltage from one test to another test. However,
-72-
in battery voltage. The procedure is outlined below.
After the pressure change is applied, the calibration
resistor is continually checked. If the magnitude of the
measured voltage changes, a new equation is started. An
example follows. At the start of the test P - P0 = (mv -o mmV )K1, where K = Ke/AmVsl. If AmVsl changes, the pres-
sure change equation becomes: P - P1 = (mVm - mv2)K2, where
K2 = K /AmVs2. mv2 is the mV reading when AmVsl is changed,
and P is the computed pressure when AmVsl is changed.
Although this method would take into account exci-
tation voltages it would not have the accuracy of the cali-
bration procedure explained previously because the volt-
meter is not as accurate, and there is a human element in
when one decides that AmVs has changed.
The overall accuracy is approximately 0.5 psi when
the excitation voltage can be measured, and about 1 psi
when the Weston meter is used and the excitation voltage
cannot be measured.
Typical calibrations are presented in Tables II
and III.
It should be mentioned that pressure changes can be
measured with a greater accuracy than these values.
-73-
ykemanicpyi~co
F
Diagram67auge
PREs$URE
- 0/APRA&1
a I
C N
TR/CAL CoaVNEcT/0N5
SMAIN WIRES
CALIOXATIOA/
Exc/rATroM
-74-
Fg. 07'
486Pv OF6vA r E
ltEc
.r
P-. PZ ttry Ve/feie Cimnme vs 1?me
510pw #m Vzday -5 uiva'ot- ft - O/ Psi /day-for 80,0exi * ws 40 /4 AWtttvw mrafts
-No cofnt are #vt, yvftr /Ot ocowet
/00 200 300
ime 1* mig fes
0
I'
0
0
Appendix C
LIST OF NOTATIONS
K Coefficient of earth pressure at rest.0
Ka Coefficient of active earth pressure.
K Coefficient of passive earth pressure.p
a3 Major principal stress.
03 Minor principal stress.
a2 Intermediate principal stress.
BBC Boston Blue Clay.
Effective vertical stress.
ah Effective horizontal stress.
AH/H0 Volumetric strain.
O.C.R. Overconsolidation (a Ia )vi v0 cm Maximum past pressure.
Pm a Ratio of the measured pressure to the applied pressure.
Pm Pressure measured by transducer.
Pa Assumed applied pressure to transducer.
-76-