Attribution of Haze Project Update

  • Upload
    terah

  • View
    39

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Attribution of Haze Project Update. Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting September 8-9, 2004 Worley, ID. Attribution of Haze Project Update. Today’s presentation Schedule status Class I areas for attribution Support contractor/web page Emissions data displays examples - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • Attribution of Haze Project UpdateFire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting

    September 8-9, 2004Worley, ID

  • Attribution of Haze Project UpdateTodays presentationSchedule statusClass I areas for attributionSupport contractor/web pageEmissions data displays examplesSource apportionment modeling parametersTransport regression approach

  • 2004 AoH Project Schedule - Status9/20-21 Uses of Modeling Results training9/21-22 AoH meeting (both in Salt Lake City)Interim emissions inventories displays/qualifiersSource apportionment modeling results for each Class I area by State and key speciesDetailed draft outline of project report 10/8 and every 2 weeks conference callWeek of 11/15 AoH and Dust Emissions Forum meetings/Causes of Haze tools training Las VegasCoHA transport regression results for source regionsNatural/manmade source apportionment results for each Class I areaContinuing drafting or reportExternal review draft report December 2004Complete report by January 2005

  • AoH Phase I Web Page OperationalGo to the AoH Work Group About page and click on the Phase I (ARS) link under Projects in the right hand navigation boxOr, go directly to this link: http://www.wrapair.org/forums/aoh/ars1/index.htmlThis page contains a brief overview of the project and direct links to ARS presentationsThe Report section of the navigation box will direct you to other ARS documents currently, only the EI Summary Products link is active

  • Review of 2002 interim EmissionsFiresActual 2002 wildland fire and prescribed fire emission inventoriesSpecific location, date, size and fuel loading for each fire event.Biogenic EmissionsBiogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS3)Vegetation Data: Biogenic Emissions Landuse Database (BELD3)Meteorological Data (MM5v3)

  • Next StepsReview modeling and monitoring resultsWork with RMC to determine best way to summarize boundary conditions and off-shore emissionsPrepare a simple comparison between actual and interim 2002 EIDevelop outline for final reportGenerate summary products for Class I areas/clustersUpdates will be presented at AoH meeting in Salt Lake City (Sept. 20-22)

  • Tagging Priorities for 2002-like EIs (State/Source Category/Species) for Geographic Source Apportionment Modeling Study (6/04)

    CMAQ/Models3 Emissions Groupings Source Categories (Priority Order) States/Countries/Regions to be Tagged# of TagsWRAP Region Data SourceCommentsSO21. Point2. Combined Mobile (on-road + non-road)1-13. Contiguous WRAP region states (WA, OR, CA, AZ, NV, UT, ID, MT, WY, CO, NM, SD, ND)14. Mexico15. Canada16. Combined area of states east of WRAP region 1. 16 2. 16 1. Pechan2. ENVIRONAccounts for ~85 % of regional emissions, varies by stateNOx1. Point2. Combined Mobile (on-road + non-road)1. 162. 161. Pechan2. ENVIRONAccounts for ~ 80% of emissions, varies by state, no biogenic NOxNH3Total NH3 from all source categories16 VariousAccounts for 100 % of emissions, dominated by area source category in all states, no biogenic NH3 PM2.5 (Includes EC, OC, fine fraction dust, and small amounts of directly emitted NO3 and SO4 EC from:1. Combined Fire (Wx, Rx, Ag)2. Area 1. 162. 161.Air Sciences2. Pechan1. Fire accounts for >50 % of regional PM2.5 emissions, varies by state2. Area accounts for ~33% of regional PM2.5 emissions, varies by statePMCoarse(Includes all species in the PM2.5 to PM10 aerosol fraction)

  • CoHA Project Example Approach: Receptor-oriented source contribution analyses of aerosol/meteorological monitoring data

  • CoHA Project Example Approach: Receptor-oriented source contribution analyses of aerosol/meteorological monitoring data

  • CoHA Project Example Approach: Receptor-oriented source contribution analyses of aerosol/meteorological monitoring data

    Fire emissions only available for WRAP states.

    Biogenic emissions available for all 50 states. Biogenic emissions are processed for model input and are represented by 36km grid cells, as opposed to county lines. Data by state includes some overlap because grid cells cross state lines.Fire emissions summed over all WRAP states. Seasonally dependent, emissions dominated by wild fires.Comparison of biogenic VOC emissions for CA, AZ, CO, and ND. Strong seasonal dependence, huge variation of magnitude across WRAP region.Map of data within modeling domain for area source emissions. Additional maps for other source categories (Area, Fire, On and off-road mobile, road dust and biogenic emissions) are available at:http://www.wrapair.org/forums/aoh/ars1/emissions_maps.htmAnother representation of area source emissions included in modeling. Same data as previous slide. This map style indicates a better representation of magnitude while the other is a better representation of speciation. Preferences?WRAP SO2 emissions for WRAP states separated by category. Summaries for other pollutants available at: http://www.wrapair.org/forums/aoh/ars1/wrap_pollutant.htm2002 pollutant emissions in Colorado divided by source category. Bar charts for other WRAP states available athttp://www.wrapair.org/forums/aoh/ars1/pollutant_by_source_charts.htmSame data as previous slide, but with 2002 category emissions in Colorado divided by pollutant. Similar charts for other WRAP states available at http://www.wrapair.org/forums/aoh/ars1/source_by_pollutant_charts.htm