Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2nd Int. MINOS Workshop, Irradiation of Nuclear Materials: Flux and Dose Effects
November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France
Atomistic Modeling of
Segregation and Precipitation
in Fe-Cr Alloys under
Irradiation
C.-C. Fu, T. Jourdan, M. Nastar, O. Senninger,
F. Soisson
SRMP, CEA Saclay
E. Martinez
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Y. Bréchet
SIMAP, Grenoble INP
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 2
Fe-Cr alloys: nuclear applications
• Fe-Cr alloys : a model for ferritic and ferritic-martensitic steels (7-18%Cr) candidate materials for future nuclear reactors (Gen IV and fusion)
Potential problems under irradiation: - α’ precipitation hardening and embrittlement - Cr depletion at GBs corrosion, embrittlement
Due to: point defect supersaturation Acceleration of precipitation
Radiation Induced Segregation (RIS) Radiation Induced Precipitation (RIP)
• Main objectives: - quantify the acceleration of precipitation in supersaturated alloys - understand the mechanisms controlling RIS - study possible effects of equilibrium vs non-equilibrium segregation, ballistic mixing, carbon
atoms,… on the precipitation and segregation kinetics
• Our approach : Atomistic Kinetic Monte Carlo (AKMC) simulations
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
400
600
800
1000
1200
α'α
T (
K)
c
α+α'
σ
TC
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 3
Diffusion model - AKMC Simulations
Pair interactions on stable (bcc) and saddle-point positions
• Diffusion by jumps of : - Vacancies (V) - Self-interstitial atoms (SIA) : dumbbells - Direct interstitials (C)
• The migration barriers are computed with a broken-
bond model: - with composition and temperature dependent pair
interactions - with saddle-point pair interactions - fitted on DFT calculations
• Formation of isolated Frenkel with replacement collision
sequences or small replacement cascades
• Annihilation of V and SIA on a perfect sink
ΓBV
ΓAV
“grain boundary” = perfect pd sink
L = 36 to 104 nm
Sink strength 22 /12 Lktot
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 4
x
PWSCF, GGA-PAW Special Quasi-random structures (SQS) Ordered structures Pair interaction model
Thermodynamics: effective pair interactions
Concentration dependent pair interactions: fitted on DFT calculations of ΔHmix at 0K Magnetic and vibrational contributions: linear temperature dependence, fitted on Tα-α’ (exp) M. Levesque et al, Phys. Rev. B 84, 184205 (2011)
( ) ( ) ( ), , ( )n n nFeFe CrCr FeCrh h h x
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) (1 )
( ) 2 ( )2
mix
n n nnFeFe CrCr FeCr
n
H x x x
zx h h h x
( ) ( ) ( )( , ) ( ) (x) , with 1,2n n nFeCr FeCr FeCrg x T h x Ts n
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 5
Diffusion coefficients
~
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10010
-17
10-16
10-15
10-14
10-13
10-12
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
Exp [1,2]
AKMC
850 K
1713 K [2]
1453 K [2]
D (
cm
2.s
-1)
% Cr
1124.2 K [1]
994.5 K [1]
914.8 K [1]
[1] Braun & Feller-Kniepmeier, 1985 [2] Jönsson 1995
Tracer diffusion coefficients (pure iron) Interdiffusion coefficients in Fe-Cr alloys
O. Senninger et al, Acta Mater. 73, 97–106 (2014)
- Acceleration of the diffusion at the F/P transition - The Curie temperature decreases with the Cr concentration
0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.410
-23
10-22
10-21
10-20
10-19
10-18
10-17
10-16
10-15
10-14
DFe
Fe*
DFe
Cr*
D (
m2 s
-1)
1000/T (K -1)
TαγT
C 600°C 500°C
γ-Fe α-Fe α-Fe
para ferro
AKMC
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 6
Kinetics of α- α’ decomposition: isothermal annealing
Fe-20%Cr T = 500°C AKMC (E. Martinez et al, 2012) 3DAP (Novy et al, 2009)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
400
600
800
1000
1200
'
'
T (
K)
xCr
E. Martinez et al, Phys. Rev. B 86, 224109 (2012) S. Novy et al, J. Nucl. Mater. 384 (2009) 96–102
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 8
Kinetics of α- α’ decomposition: isothermal annealing
500°C
540°C
SANS experiments AKMC simulations AKMC simulations without magnetic acceleration
Small-angle neutron scattering experiments (SANS) 500°C: Bley (1992) 540°C: Furusaka et al. (1986)
O. Senninger et al, Acta Mater. 73, 97–106 (2014)
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 9
Radiation Accelerated Precipitation: experiments
Experimental evidences (3DAP) in Fe-9% to 20%Cr alloys at 290-300°C - isothermal annealing: α’ precipitation is not observed due to slow kinetics - neutron irradiation: α’ precipitation Bachhav et al (Scripta Mater 2014) Fe-3%Cr to 18%Cr, T= 290°C 3.4 x 10-7 dpa/s, 1.82 dpa V. Kuksenko et al, JNM 432 (2013) 160 C. Pareige et al JNM 456 (2015) 471–476 Precipitation under neutron irradiation in Fe-9%Cr and Fe-12%Cr, but not under ion irradiation at higher flux
Cr rich clusters
• P • Si
3%Cr 6%Cr 9%Cr
12%Cr 15%Cr 18%Cr
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 10
3DAP Kuksenko et al
(2012) Fe-12%Cr
300°C – 0.6 dpa
Radiation Accelerated Precipitation: AKMC
AKMC simulations Point defect concentration profiles Fe-18%Cr @ 563 K, 3.4 x 10-7 dpa.s-1
104 nm
GB
Precipitate free zones near the GBs
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 11
Radiation Accelerated Precipitation: AKMC vs 3DAP
• AKMC simulations: one GB in the simulation box (constant sink strength: ) • Cluster Dynamics: evolution of the sink strength (in pure iron)
better estimation of the point defect concentration
rescaling of the Monte Carlo time scale
Strong acceleration by irradiation (x 106-107) Good agreement with the experiments of neutron irradiation (Bachhav et al, 2014)
F. Soisson, T. Jourdan, Acta Mater 2016.
2 212 /totk L
2, ,/ ( )i v tot i vc G k D
,
,
( )
( )i v
MC
i v
c AKMCt t
c CD
2totk
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
1010
1011
1012
1013
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
R (
nm
)
t (s)
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
1010
1011
1012
1013
1018
1019
1020
irradiation 3.4 x 10-7 dpa.s
-1
3DAP (Bachhav et al, 2014)
AKMC - k2
tot = 12/(L
2)
AKMC - k2
tot (CD)
dp (
cm
-3)
Fe-18%Cr @ 563 K
thermal ageing
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
1010
1011
1012
1013
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
thermal ageing
R (
nm
)
t (s)
1018
1019
1020
irradiation 3.4 x 10-7 dpa.s
-1
3DAP (Bachhav et al, 2014)
AKMC - k2
tot = C
te
AKMC - k2
tot (CD)
dp (
cm
-3)
Fe-15%Cr @ 563 K
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 12
Effect of ballistic mixing
• Experiments: Cr precipitation under neutron irradiation, but not under ion irradiation at higher flux A ballistic dissolution of α’ precipitates, in displacement cascades ?
• AKMC simulations - at different dose rates G (dpa.s-1) - with different numbers of replacements/displacement Nrep/Ndis = 0 (channeling) Nrep/Ndis = 10 (replacement collision sequences) Nrep/Ndis = 100 (cascades)
• At 290°C
- no dissolution of precipitates - no effect of Nrep/Ndis on the precipitation kinetics - dose rate effects: a simple acceleration due to the point defect supersaturation ballistic effects do not explain the difference between ion and neutron irradiations • Possible ballistic effects at lower temperatures (below 100°C)
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
R (
nm
)
t (s)
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
1018
1019
1020
3.4 x 10-7 dpa.s-1
10-3 dpa.s-1
dp (
cm
-3)
Fe-18%Cr @ 563 K
2, ,/ ( )i v tot i vc G k D
3 4balΓ
γ= 10 10Γ stth v v
G
c D
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 13
-40 -20 0 20 400.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.012 dpa
0.636 dpa
XCr
distance (nm)
-40 -20 0 20 4010
-14
10-13
10-12
10-11
10-10
10-9
vacancies
self-interstitials
Cd
Fe-10%Cr
950 K
10-3 dpa.s
-1
Radiation-Induced Segregation
CrV CrICr V
FeV FeI
L LC C
L L
Steady-state profile:
jj
μi ijJ L
-40 -20 0 20 400.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.007 dpa
0.294 dpa
XCr
distance (nm)
-40 -20 0 20 4010
-16
10-15
10-14
10-13
10-12
10-11
10-10
vacancies
self-interstitials
Cd
Fe-10%Cr
650 K
10-6 dpa.s
-1JV/JCr : negative coupling Cr depletion at sinks, dominant at high T JSIA/JCr : positive coupling Cr enrichment at sinks, dominant at low T
Fe-10%Cr
T = 650 K, 10-6 dpa.s-1
Fe-10%Cr
T = 950 K, 10-3 dpa.s-1
GB
GB
O. Senninger et al Acta Materialia 103, 1–11 (2016)
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 14
-40 -20 0 20 400.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
XCr
distance (nm)
0.06 dpa
-40 -20 0 20 400.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
XCr
distance (nm)
0.338 dpa
Radiation-Induced Segregation
CrV CrICr V
FeV FeI
L LC C
L L
Steady-state profile:
jj
μi ijJ L JV/JCr : negative coupling Cr depletion at sinks, dominant at high T JSIA/JCr : positive coupling Cr depletion at sinks, dominant at low T
Fe-10%Cr
T = 650 K, 10-6 dpa.s-1
Fe-10%Cr
T = 950 K, 10-3 dpa.s-1
GB
GB
W-shape profile
0.1eVsegCre
0.1eVsegCre
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 15
Radiation-Induced Precipitation (AKMC)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
400
600
800
1000
1200
α'α
T (
K)
c
α+α'
σ
TC
Undersaturated alloys, at low T: strong Cr enrichment on sinks RIS radiation induced precipitation
T = 563 K Fe-9%Cr 10-6 dpa.s-1
0.20 dpa
-40 -20 0 20 400.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
CCr
d (nm)
-40 -20 0 20 4010
-17
10-16
10-15
10-14
10-13
10-12
10-11
10-10
vacancies
self-interstitials
d (nm)
Cd
CEA – DEN 2nd Int. MINOS Workshop - November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France 16
CONCLUSIONS
AKMC simulations with thermodynamic and point defect parameters fitted on DFT calculations
Good description of driving forces, diffusion properties and nucleation
In Fe-Cr alloys • Magnetic effects are important (impact on thermodynamic and diffusion properties)
• Radiation Induced Segregation is controlled by a balance between opposite effects of V and SIA the Lij are very dependent of the details of migration barriers may explain the variability of experimental studies (≠ RIS in austenitic steels)
• Radiation accelerated precipitation
- a good agreement with neutron irradiations (with rescaling of the sink strength using CD) - no effect ballistic mixing in the experimental conditions (relatively high temperatures, high sink densities) does
not explain the difference between neutron an on irradiation - precipitation kinetics is less sensitive than Radiation Induced Segregation to the details of migration barriers
• Related work, perspectives
- Phase-Field model for RIS (J.B. Piochaud, L. Thunier, A. Legris – UMET, Lille)
- Precipitation under electron irradiation (O. Tissot, et al)
- Effects of C (or O, N) on the kinetics of precipitation and segregation