Upload
others
View
8
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The global voice of ATM
ATFM – CANSO Global Role
Stuart Ratcliffe
Co – chair CANSO OSC ATFM WG
ICAO Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) Seminar (Dubai, UAE, 13-15 December 2016)
Agenda
• CANSO Activities o DOC 9971 Review Panel o APAC ATFM SG o CANSO ATFM WG
• CANSO Global Initiatives o APAC o Caribbean
• ATFM in the Middle East. o What Concept for Middle East o Multi-Nodal? o Benefits
• Keys for Successful ATFM/CDM Implementation • Conclusion
CANSO and ICAO
• ICAO ATM OPS Panel
DOC 9971 o Part of Review Panel o Contributed to rewrite
of Document
CANSO initiatives aligned with ICAO
APAC ATFM SG
• CANSO been member of SG meetings o ATFM SME
o Standard Terminology
o Capacity Enhancement
o Document writing and
review
CANSO contributing to ATFM implementation
CANSO ATFM WG
CANSO recognized that Regional ATFM implementation is needed OSC established CDMTF – renamed ATFM WG Objectives: • Best Practice Guide for CDM and ATFM implementation • Support development of common regional ATFM Framework • Support CANSO Regional Directors on ATFM in Regional
Implementation Groups
CANSO active in assisting with Regional ATFM implementation
CANSO Global ATFM Initiatives
• APAC
• Caribbean and Latin America
CANSO Global ATFM Initiative - APAC
CANSO Whole of flight CDM Pilot Project between BKK-SIN 2011-2012
Tripartite CDM Project between BKK-HKG-SIN 2012-2013
Multi Nodal Regional ATFM Concept 2014 - ….
Research Collaboration on Regional ATFM Concept 2013
ATFM Measure Effectiveness: Participation
• Demand Capacity Balancing requires sufficient participation of Aircraft
• 70% participation of flights is necessary to make an ATFM Measure fair and equitable
• Aircraft Participation o Domestic flights o International/Regional flights – flight duration up to approximately 4 hours o International flights – long haul flights
>70% participation ideal
APAC – A new ConOps 0%
100%
Domestic International
Singapore Changi
Jakarta Soekarno-Hatta
22.70%
77.30%
Bangkok Suvarnabhumi
Hong Kong International
33.30%
66.70%
Kuala Lumpur International
International vs. domestic flight mix identified a need for new ATFM ConOps
Multi- Nodal Cross Border Regional ATFM
• Domestic/Regional/International flights • No Central Management • Connected via virtual network • Each State responsible for ATFM within own
state • All participating states adhere to common
operational procedures • Could include Airborne flights • Aircraft Operators choose where to take
delay: – Gate – Surface – En-Route
Project Members Level 3 ATFM Nodes Generate, Distribute, Comply to CTOT
China Hong Kong China Singapore Thailand
Level 2 ATFM Nodes Receive and Comply to CTOT
Indonesia Malaysia Cambodia
Level 1 ATFM Nodes Observers
Philippines Viet Nam Lao PDR Myanmar
Advisor Australia
Status of the ConOps
Process of Implementation in APAC
• Distributed Ground Delay Program • Airport Arrival Constraints (short-term &
medium-term) e.g. weather, runway outage
Phase 1 2015 - 2016
• Ground Delay Program supporting Airspace Congestion & Capacity Planning
• Explore interconnectivity among ATFM systems Phase 2
• Fully interconnected Global ATFM Service • Integration with SWIM and 4D-Trajectory
Management
Phase X Vision
Phased Approach to the Operational Trial
CADENA CADENA = CANSO ATFM Data Exchange Network for the Americas
“Cadena” is also the Spanish for “chain”.
• 1st Meeting - CUBA August 2016
• 2nd Meeting - Argentina October 2016
CADENA Progress
• Progress thus far o Terms of reference, roles and responsibilities set o FAA has made SWIM Platform available for all participating
countries – Requirements for connection o Discussion on ATFM information to be shared o What is needed to connect to the SWIM platform o Organizational Structure of ATFMU being proposed o Letters of Agreement being set o Job descriptions of ATFM personnel o CDM Teleconference instruction o 6 practice ATFM Telecons
Significant progress in short space
of time
CDM Telecons • Objectives
o All stakeholders gain insight into ATM
conditions in region, pre-tactical and tactical
o Common interpretation of weather conditions
o Sharing constraints in FIRs and in region
o Explain any ATFM measures to be implemented
o Post Event Analysis
CADENA going forward • Review existing national plans for ATFM • Identify Key Stakeholders • Identify Resources
o Facilities o Equipment o Staffing
• Procedure Development o Internal and Regional o Documentation
• Education • Ensure implementation is harmonized within the region and
between regions. Participating ANSPs are committed
to harmonized Regional ATFM
ATFM/CDM in Middle East
• It is evident that ATFM/CDM is required in the region • Can ATFM models employed in other countries/regions be effective in
Middle East? o North America
o Central Authority o Domestic Flights only
o EUROCONTROL o Central Authority o Traffic within EUROCONTROL region
o Australia o Central Authority o Domestic Traffic only
o APAC o No Central Authority - All ANSPs responsible for ATFM in their own area of responsibility o Domestic/Regional/International o All connected via a Virtual CDM Platform
What ConOps is applicable?
ATFM Middle East
Similar Situation to APAC • Significant growth • Demand exceeding Capacity • Not enough domestic flights to
make up 70% participation • Domestic Solution not feasible • Centralized ATFMU? • High percentage of Regional and
International flights
Middle East Cross Border Multi-Nodal ATFM?
CDM VIRTUAL
ATFM
BAHRAIN ATFMU
SAUDI ARABIA ATFMU
KUWAIT ATFMU
QATAR ATFMU
EUROCONTROL
UAE ATFMU
RIYADH
JEDDAH
DUBAI
ABU DHABI
SZC
OMAN ATFMU
MUSCAT Fujairah
Regional Qualitative Benefits
• Networked approach • Enhanced situational awareness
between ANSPs • More effective planning in all
phases of ATFM will take place • Airports with minimal domestic
traffic will be able to do DCB • ATFM measures will be fair and
equitable • Network planning during special
event planning
Operational Benefits - Quantitative
• Benefits Analysis was performed using Operational Scenarios and actual data for OMDB
• Simulation ATFM System was used to perform analysis by simulating GDPs
Operational Benefits - Quantitative Conservative approach adopted shows significant annual savings available for implementing ATFM
Keys for Successful Regional ATFM/CDM
• Support from Executive Management • ANSPs need to work together for Regional implementation • Engagement with stakeholders to drive cultural change • Trust among stakeholders through transparent processes • Core requirements for Demand Capacity Balancing
o Data availability for network-wide demand projection
• Flexibility to adapt the plan o Capacity can change, the plan must be able to change with it o Aircraft operators can modify flight priorities and schedules
• Continuous improvement through performance assessment o Post event operational analysis
ATFM Implementation requires common purpose and commitment from all stakeholders
Global ATFM/CDM
A U S T R A L I A
C O L OMBIA
PE R U
BOLIVIA
CHILE
C A N A D A
MEXI C O
BELIZE
HONDURAS
NI C AR A G U A
G U A TEMA L A
C O S T A RI C A
P A N AMA
SURI N AME
P AR A G U A Y
(DENMARK)
U N I T E D S T A T E S
B R A Z I L
GU Y A N A
EC U ADOR
U . S.
A R GENTI N A
VENEZUE L A
G r eenland
F r ench Guiana
QUEEN ELIZABETH ISLANDS
Island of Newfoundland
EL S A L V ADOR
CU B A
B AHAMAS THE
REPUBLIC
DOMINI C AN
J AMAI C A HAITI
PUERTO RICO
U R UG U A Y
ICE L AND N O R W A Y
SWEDEN
FINLAND
FRA N CE
S P AIN
I T A L Y
TUNISIA
MO R OC C O
UNITED KI N GDOM
L IRELAND
R OMANIA
A L G E R I A L I B Y A
E G Y P T
DENMARK
GERMANY
GREECE
PO R TU G AL
NETH.
E S T .
L A T . LITH.
BE L A R US
U K R A I N E
PO L AND
BU L G ARIA
THE G AMBIA
ZAMBIA
A N GO L A
N I G E R
LIBERIA C AME R OON
G A B ON
EQ U A T ORIAL GUINEA
GUINEA GUINE A -BIS S A U
M A L I M A URI T ANIA
SENE G AL
NIGERIA
D'I V OIRE C Ô TE
SIERRA LEONE
BURKI N A F ASO
CHAD
GHA N A
S A O T OME AND PRI N CIPE
C O N GO
RE P . OF THE
T ANZANIA
KEN Y A U G AN D A
AFRI C AN REPUBLIC CENTRAL
S U D A N
ETHIOPIA
OF THE C O N GO
DEMOCR A
REPUBLIC
ZIM B A B WE
B O T S W A N A
N AMIBIA
ERITREA
R W AN D A
BU R UNDI
MOZAMBIQUE
S W AZI L AND
AFRI C A SOUTH
LES O THO
MA L A WI
C APE VERDE YEMEN
S YRIA
GEO R GIA
IR A Q
T U R K E Y
JORDAN
KU W AIT
S A UDI
ARABIA
MOLD O V
I R A N AFGHANISTAN
PAKISTAN
B AHRAIN
Q A T AR
OMAN
DJIBOUTI
TURKMENSTANI
KY R G YZ S T AN
T AJIKI S T AN
K A Z A K H S T A N
M A URITIUS MA D A G AS C AR
SOMALIA
R U S S I A
M O N G O L I A
I N D I A
B A N G L ADESH
BURMA
NE P AL BHU T AN
SRI L ANKA
C H I N A
J A P AN
N O R TH K OREA
SOUTH K OREA
PHILIPPINES
THAI L AND
C AMBODIA
VIET N AM
SINGAPORE
B R UNEI
M A L A Y S I A
I N D O N E S I A PAPUA
NEW GUINEA
NEW ZEALAND
SOLOMON ISLANDS
V
I
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
UZBEKISTAN
AZERBAIJAN ARMENIA
ISRAEL
LEBANON
LAOS
ARGENTINA
Conclusion
• CANSO playing active role in Regional ATFM/CDM formulation and development
• ATFM Benefits will be evident for all stakeholders • An ATFM ConOps and roadmap for implementation needs to be
developed for the ME region • Supports ATFM/CDM implementation in the Middle East • ANSPs need to work together to common goal • All stakeholders need to be involved from inception • ATFM/CDM needs support from Executive Management • Learn from other ANSPs and regions