arX

iv:a

stro

-ph/

0703

463v

2 1

8 A

ug 2

007

Draft version November 12, 2017Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09

THREE-DIMENSIONAL DYNAMICAL INSTABILITIES IN GALACTIC IONIZATION FRONTS

Daniel J. Whalen1 & Michael L. Norman2

Draft version November 12, 2017

ABSTRACT

Ionization front instabilities have long been of interest for their suspected role in a variety of phe-nomena in the galaxy, from the formation of bright rims and ’elephant trunks’ in nebulae to triggeredstar formation in molecular clouds. Numerical treatments of these instabilities have historically beenlimited in both dimensionality and input physics, leaving important questions about their true evo-lution unanswered. We present the first three-dimensional radiation hydrodynamical calculations ofboth R-type and D-type ionization front instabilities in galactic environments (i.e., solar metallicitygas). Consistent with linear stability analyses of planar D-type fronts, our models exhibit many short-wavelength perturbations growing at early times that later evolve into fewer large-wavelength struc-tures. The simulations demonstrate that both self-consistent radiative transfer and three-dimensionalflow introduce significant morphological differences to unstable modes when compared to earlier two-dimensional approximate models. We find that the amplitude of the instabilities in the nonlinearregime is primarily determined by the efficiency of cooling within the shocked neutral shell. Strongradiative cooling leads to long, extended structures with pronounced clumping while weaker coolingleads to saturated modes that devolve into turbulent flows. These results suggest that expanding HII regions may either promote or provide turbulent support against the formation of later generationsof stars, with potential consequences for star formation rates in the galaxy today.

Subject headings: H II regions: simulation—interstellar medium: ionization fronts—galaxy

1. INTRODUCTION

This is the first of two papers that study ionizationfront (I-front) instabilities in the nonlinear regime us-ing three-dimensional radiation hydrodynamical simula-tions. In this paper we consider I-fronts propagating ina gas of solar metallicity, appropriate to galactic mas-sive star forming environments. In a second paper, wesimulate I-front propagation in primordial gas with lowmetallicities relevant to star formation at high redshifts.We demonstrate that the cooling properties of the gashave a large influence on how I-front instabilities mani-fest.These instabilities have been the subject of numer-

ous analytical and numerical studies for the past fiftyyears, primarily for their suspected role in the for-mation of inhomogeneities observed in galactic emis-sion nebulae since the 1930’s (Kahn 1958; Axford1964; Garcia-Segura & Franco 1996; Franco et al. 1998;Williams 1999, 2002). Initial corrugations in the frontsdue to ambient density fluctuations are thought to elon-gate into ionized fingers extending ahead of the front thatcan evolve into the ’elephant trunks’, bright rims, andcometary globules commonly seen in the galaxy today.Dynamical instabilities in H II regions are of direct rele-vance to the environments of massive stars (Freyer et al.2003) and gamma-ray burst progenitors in general, possi-bly acting in concert with stellar winds to drive clumpingof gas that later become susceptible to gravitational in-stabilities and collapse. Perturbations in the ionizationfront shocks of OB associations may also come into play

1 Applied Theoretical Physics (X-2), Los Alamos National Lab-oratory

2 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University ofCalifornia at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A. Email:dwhalen@cosmos.ucsd.edu

in scenarios of triggered star formation within molecularclouds (Dale et al. 2007). Historically, studies of I-frontinstabilities have progressed in both dimensionality andphysics along two lines: unstable modes in R-type frontsand in D-type I-fronts (see Osterbrock (1989) for a reviewof modern I-front nomenclature and Whalen & Norman(2006) for numerical examples in one dimension).

1.1. Shadowing Instabilities in R-Type Fronts

R-type I-fronts propagate supersonically through me-dia with minimal hydrodynamical coupling to thegas. The stability of this type of front to encoun-ters with modest density perturbations was examinedby Vandervoort (1962) and Newman & Axford (1967).Newman & Axford (1967) found the fronts to be weaklyunstable but were unable to follow their evolution intoD-type structures. Bertoldi (1989) studied the flash ion-ization of diffuse clumps in which the front does not re-vert to D-type (the ’cloud-zapping regime’). He con-cluded that the clumps evaporate without forming newinhomogeneities in their wake but could not determinethe downstream fate of the front itself. Several groupshave investigated the shadowing of I-fronts by denseclumps (Mellema et al. 1998; Canto et al. 1998; Soker1998), with particular focus on the evolution of the neu-tral tails behind the clumps. Most recent in this vein arethe studies by Shapiro et al. (2004) of cosmological mini-halo photoevaporation by external Population III andquasar ionizing sources at high and intermediate red-shifts. The aim of these simulations was to assess therole of minihalos as sinks of ionizing UV photons duringcosmological reionization. Shadows rather than insta-bilities arose in these models because the obstructionstrapped the I-fronts as they evaporated.

2

Williams (1999) revisited instability modes in R-typefronts, in this instance following their transition to D-type far downstream of the original perturbation. Theiranalysis revealed that the overdensity indents a planarR-type front with a dimple that first elongates but thensaturates (Fig 1 in Williams (1999)). The ionizing pho-tons are oblique to the sides of the dimple but incident toits tip. Since the flux is lower at the sides than at the tip,as the front approaches the Stromgren position the shockbreaks through the front along the wall of the dimple be-fore its tip. Still R-type, the tip races forward, elongat-ing the dimple into a nonlinear jet instability when thetransition to D-critical is complete. If the shocked gasefficiently cools, the thin-shell hydrodynamic instabilityappears and fragments the gas into clumps with densitieshundreds of times greater than the ambient medium.

1.2. Dynamical Instabilities in D-Type Fronts

D-type I-fronts move supersonically with respect tothe upstream neutral gas, but subsonically (or sonically)with respect to the downstream ionized gas. Conse-quently, D-type fronts are preceded by shocks in theneutral gas. Soon after the modern nomenclature forI-fronts was established, Kahn (1958) and Axford (1964)examined the stability of perturbations in planar weakD-type fronts. They discovered that recombinations tothe ground state within ionized fingers advancing aheadof the front effectively dampened their further growthupon reaching lengths of a few ni

−1 pc, where ni is theelectron density in the postfront gas. This is the productof the sound speed of the ionized gas and its recombi-nation time; in galactic environments such corrugationsare initially short wavelength and saturate quickly. Asthe fingers lengthen, photons must cross more neutralsresulting from recombinations, which attenuate the ion-izing flux advancing the tip of the disturbance.Instabilities that do exhibit strong growth were later

discovered in D-type ionization fronts, but only in con-junction with pre-existing flow instabilities (Vishniac1983; Capriotti 1973; Brand 1981). In general, expand-ing spherical shocks are prone to a variety of dynamicalinstabilities that can result in their fragmentation andbreakup. Radiating shocks are subject to the Vishniac(or thin-shell) instability in either uniform densities orgradients, while Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities can arise inadiabatic or radiating flows if they accelerate (which oc-curs in radial power-law density gradients steeper thanr−2).The Vishniac mechanism can be visualized as follows

(Fig 1 of Mac Low & Norman (1993)): in the frame ofthe shock, the inflow ram pressure is unidirectional whilethe ionized postshock pressure is isotropic. If a densityfluctuation is advected across the shock, small transversevelocities arise across the face of the shock that createoverdensities and underdensities along adjacent lines ofsight from the center of the shell. The postshock gas thenprotrudes through the underdense regions, dimpling theshock into peaks and valleys and forcing even greatertransverse flows that further bunch gas across adjoin-ing lines of sight. However, the higher pressures in thetroughs eventually reverse the transverse flows, resultingin oscillatory ripples with modest growth rates across theface of the shock commonly known as overstabilities.Both thin-shell overstabilities and Rayleigh-Taylor in-

stabilities are exacerbated when driven by an ioniza-tion front (Spitzer 1954; Frieman 1954; Giuliani 1979;Garcia-Segura & Franco 1996; Williams et al. 2000;Mizuta et al. 2005, 2006). When perturbations ap-pear in the shell, the radiation preferentially advancesinto the lower optical depths of the underdensities, re-inforcing the transverse velocity gradients that origi-nally created them in a repeat of the cycle describedabove (Fig 1 of Garcia-Segura & Franco). What dis-tinguishes unstable modes in blast waves or wind-blownbubbles from those in D-type fronts is their ampli-tude: in extreme cases the radiation may escape throughcracks in the shock, driving even greater hydrodynami-cal growth (Garcia-Segura & Franco 1996; Franco et al.1998; Freyer et al. 2003). The violence of flow instabili-ties in general is largely governed by the cooling rates ofthe shocked gas. Efficient cooling collapses the shockedneutral gas into a thin, dense cold shell more prone tobreakup than a thick semi-adiabatic shock. We notethat a class of long-wavelength unstable surface modes inweak D-type fronts has recently been uncovered by an-alytical and numerical work done by Sysoev (1997) andWilliams (2002) that are independent of any other flowinstabilities, but we do not consider them here.A key question is how the dimensionality of ionized

flows dictates the nature of perturbation growth in R-type and D-type fronts, given that published simulationshave been confined to two dimensions. Furthermore,instability growth is mediated by I-front transitions inprefront shocked gas that mandate radiation hydrody-namics rather than the approximations heretofore per-formed (Garcia-Segura & Franco 1996; Dale et al. 2007;Yoshida et al. 2006). In order to explore these issues wehave performed the first three-dimensional radiation hy-drodynamical calculations of dynamical instabilities inD-type fronts (Franco et al. 1998) and shadowing insta-bilities in R-type fronts (Williams 1999) with metal-linecooling. These models have been made possible by re-cent upgrades to the ZEUS-MP reactive flow physics code(Whalen & Norman 2006) (hereafter WN06) to performfully-parallelized three-dimensional radiation transportfor a point source in spherical polar grids and for planewaves in cartesian boxes. Our calculations are intendedto survey the qualitative nature of three-dimensional in-stabilities in galactic ionization fronts rather than pro-vide detailed comparisons to analytical studies, whichhave only been performed in one dimension. We focus ondynamical phenomena in r−2 density fields for compar-ison to earlier two-dimensional numerical work and fortheir similarity to clump profiles observed in massive starforming regions within molecular clouds in the galaxy to-day (Arquilla & Goldsmith 1985; Gregorio Hetem et al.1988). Our numerical suite is therefore of direct rele-vance to the environments of massive stars as well asthe morphologies of emission nebulae in the interstellarmedium (ISM). Since our simulations all employ radia-tive cooling in uniform or r−2 densities, we expect initialperturbation growth to be dominated by Vishniac modes.In nearly adiabatic primordial gas with steeper gradientssuch as those in cosmological minihalos, unstable modescould be initiated through the Rayleigh-Taylor channel,a possibility we investigate in a following paper.In Section 2 we describe the improvements to our ra-

3

diative transfer and reaction network integration schemerequired by transport in three dimensions as well asthe parallelization and load balancing of the transportitself. In section 3 we compare two-dimensional cal-culations of dynamical instabilities on polar grids per-formed with simplified ionization equilibrium physics tothose with full radiative transfer. Our three-dimensionalsimulations of these instabilities on spherical-polar co-ordinate grids are detailed in Section 4 and we presentthree-dimensional calculations of the shadow instabilityWilliams (1999) in section 5. Implications of this workare discussed in Section 6.

2. ZEUS-MP ALGORITHM UPGRADES

The ZEUS-MP hydrocode utilized in previous one-dimensional work (Whalen et al. 2004) is now fully par-allelized for three-dimensional applications. We imple-mented the transport of UV plane waves along the x-axisof a cartesian box (or along the z-axis of a cylindrical co-ordinate grid) in addition to the original radial transferof photons from a point source centered in a sphericalpolar coordinate mesh. The parallel reactive flow, addi-tions to the radiative transfer, and improvements to oursubcycling scheme are detailed below.

2.1. Parallelization Scheme

We refer the reader to WN06 for a description of oursequential multistep radiation algorithm. ZEUS-MP de-composes the simulation domain into subunits calledtiles, with each tile assigned to a single processor for theduration of a calculation (Hayes et al. 2006). Globalsolution concurrency is maintained by message-passingbetween processors through calls to the Message PassingInterface (MPI) library. In general, the computationaldomain can be partitioned along all three axes but inphotoionization calculations we limit the decompositionto two axes only. In cartesian coordinates we subdividethe volume along the y and z directions only; in cylin-drical coordinates the decomposition is along the r andphi axes, and in spherical grids we tile only along thetaand phi. Hence, a tile in a cartesian grid is a rectangu-lar box whose length in the x direction spans the entiregrid. In cylindrical coordinates, tiles are wedges in r andphi lengthwise in z, and in spherical coordinates theyare slices in theta and phi radiating outward from thecoordinate center to the outer radial boundary.Domain decomposition is implemented along only two

coordinates in ZEUS-MP to enforce load balancing of theradiative transfer and to avoid the need to communicatephoton fluxes between adjacent tiles. The key to effectiveload balancing is requiring that the ionization front bepresent in all the tiles at once. Subdivision along all threeaxes for a single point source or plane wave would resultin the few tiles hosting the front shouldering a dispropor-tionate fraction of the chemistry subcycling, leaving theother tiles relatively idle. The tradeoff in this scheme isthe limit to the parallelization that can be applied to agiven problem.The reaction network is evolved plane by plane within

a tile. Updates to the reaction network can be madeone plane of zones at a time because the chemistry inany given zone over ∆tchem does not depend on its near-est neighbors. We advance the network one plane at a

time so the reaction coefficients can be stored in two-dimensional arrays. Up to thirty rate coefficients arepresent in the reaction network and as many as 21 heat-ing and cooling coefficients comprise the isochoric updateto the gas energy. Any network update order requiringthe coefficient arrays to be three-dimensional would in-flate the memory required for a calculation by a factorof ten beyond what is required just for hydrodynamics.We prevent the solution for the entire grid from being

evolved further than the shortest evolution time in anyof its tiles by performing an MPI all reduce operation toextract the global minimum of ∆theat. The smaller of thegrid minima of ∆theat and the Courant time is adoptedfor the hydrodynamical update of gas energies, densities,and velocities. To further preserve solution coherence,mpi barrier calls are stationed at the end of the reactionnetwork module to ensure subcycling is complete in allthe tiles before any of them advance to the next operator-split step in the hydrodynamics. This procedure is nec-essary because of the implementation of asynchronousmessage passing in ZEUS-MP, in which code executionin some tiles can proceed while communication betweenother tiles is still in progress.

2.2. Radiative Transfer: Cartesian and CylindricalCoordinates

We compute the attenuation of the ionizing flux alongrays parallel to the grid lines. In cartesian coordinates,the rays are parallel to the x-axis. In cylindrical coor-dinates, the rays are parallel to the z-axis. Generalizingthe radiative rate coefficients krad evaluated in WN06 toplanar radiation flows is straightforward. Recalling thatthe number of photons removed from a zone per second(nioniz) is related to the radiative rate coefficient (krad)by eq. 18 of WN06

krad =nioniz

nH Vcell, (1)

and that photon conservation demands that

nioniz =FoutAout − FinAin

hν, (2)

where F and A are the flux (in erg/sec/cm2) and areaover the given face of the zone, we have that

krad =nph

(

1− e−χ(ri+1−ri))

nH∆x, (3)

where nph is the emission rate of all photons at a givenenergy, ∆x is the zone length along the x-axis, and χis the mean free path of the photons in the neutral gas.This derivation holds with axial plane wave transport incylindrical geometries because the metric terms in thearea factors drop out. We include an option for atten-uating the plane wave flux by r−2 to approximate thegeometric dilution of a point source.We tested the radiative transfer by computing the posi-

tion of a one-dimensional planar ionization front in a uni-form static medium of hydrogen, with nH = 1000 cm−3

and T = 72 K. The grid has 1000 zones in the x directionand a length of 1.0 pc. The photon flux along the x-axis

4

Fig. 1.— Approach of the static planar ionization front to xStr,numerical vs analytical.

incident to the left-hand face is J0 = 4.0 × 1011 cm−2

s−1, and we applied a constant case B recombination co-efficient αB = 2.015 × 10−13 cm3 s−1. By equating thephoton flux at the front to the incoming flux of neutralparticles we can compute the velocity and position of thefront in the usual manner:

vf =mi

ρiJf =

nγ,f

nA=

1

n

[

J0 − xfn2αB

]

(4)

where nγ,f is the total number of ionizing photons reach-ing the front per unit time and A is the area of the zoneface. The position of the front easily follows from simpleintegration:

xf =J0

n2αB

(

1− e−αBt)

(5)

We show the evolution of the front in the static mediumin Fig 1; for the parameters of this test, xStr = 0.644 pc.The code agrees with the analytical prediction to within5% at all times. A parallelized version of this test wasperformed in three dimensions to verify that the advanceof the front in each tile was identical.

2.3. Advanced Subcycling

As detailed in WN06, in one-dimensional problems theprimordial gas reaction network in ZEUS-MP was cycledover consecutive chemical timesteps

∆tchem = 0.1ne

ne(6)

until a hydro timestep was covered

∆thydro = min(∆tcour,∆theat) = min

(

∆ r

cs, 0.1

egaseht/cl

)

(7)

This scheme proved to be robust and versatile, accommo-dating regions experiencing either photoionization or re-combination. However, timescale analysis revealed that

cells close to the source without any initial electron frac-tion required as many as 70 - 80 hydrodynamical up-dates before coming to ionization equilibrium upon ar-rival of the front. Network subcycling between updatesalso tended to be extreme in such zones, with severalthousand iterations required to cross ∆thydro at times,far more than are required for accuracy. The problem isameliorated at larger radii because heating times increasefurther away from the source. Also, advection transportssmall electron fractions into zones slightly ahead of thefront, preventing initially minute ∆tchem.Practical I-front transport in three dimensions required

two improvements to our integration scheme. Whenthe front encounters overdensities, advection of electronsinto those zones is halted, resulting in paralyzingly shortchemical timesteps until the front exits the perturbation.We eliminated this problem by modifying ∆tchem:

∆tchem = 0.1ne + 0.001nH

ne(8)

The correction term ensures that ∆tchem is not too smallwhen photoionizations commence in the zone and has lit-tle effect as the zone approaches equilibrium and ∆tchemincreases. The algorithm now advances ionization frontsthrough density jumps without difficulty.We also experimented with more agressive subcycling

by requiring that a zone come to ionization equilibriumin no more than 7 - 8 hydrodynamical updates by altering∆thydro:

∆thydro = min

(

∆tcour,egaseht/cl

)

. (9)

We obtain speedups of up to 15 in transporting R-typefronts with this time step prescription, but there is littleimprovement with D-type fronts because in primordialenvironments ∆tcour is usually the smaller of the twotimescales in eq. 9. Two difficulties arose in this method.First, the longer time step can cause overshoot in thecooling as the zone reaches full ionization, occasionallyremoving all the gas energy in a zone in a single update.We resolved this issue by reverting to the original timestep if egas < 0 in a zone, which removed the anomalouscooling with little sacrifice in performance.Unfortunately, the coarser time steps can lead to inac-

curacies in the reaction network, causing the propagationof R-type fronts to diverge from theory by as much as 10- 20%. In many practical applications this is not a se-rious error, so the performance gain may outweigh theloss in accuracy. While we retain both subcycle optionsin the code, we applied only the improved ∆tchem tothese studies to properly capture peturbations in R-typefronts that later grow into instabilities after becomingD-type.

3. D-TYPE INSTABILITIES IN TWO DIMENSIONS

We now examine the growth of unstable modes in aD-type ionization front that is expanding in a radiallysymmetric gas profile randomly seeded with minute fluc-tuations in density on a polar coordinate grid. We con-sider the development of instabilities in a uniform core

5

enclosed by an r−2 envelope

nH(r) =

{

nc if r ≤ rcnc(r/rc)

−2 if r ≥ rc

assuming that the shocked gas is radiatively cooled bymetal emission lines. This problem was first studied byGarcia-Segura & Franco (1996) (hereafter GSF) and wecompare their results below.We augmented the isochoric gas energy update in

ZEUS-MP (eq. 9 of WN06) with cooling curvesfrom Dalgarno & McCray (1972) in which any elemen-tal abundances can be specified. The Dalgarno & Mc-Cray curves include both electron and neutral hydrogencollisional excitation of H, He, and neutral and singly-ionized C, O, N, Fe, Si, and S. The energy equation alsohas cooling due to electron collisional ionization of hydro-gen, H and He recombinational cooling, bremsstrahlungcooling, and Compton cooling by free electrons off thecosmic microwave background (for high-redshift applica-tions). These latter two processes play a negligible rolein our simulations. In general, the Dalgarno & McCraycooling rates in a given cell can be constructed with anyelectron or neutral H number density derived from thereaction network. For consistency with GSF, we evaluatethem assuming a fixed electron fraction of 0.01 and solarmetallicity in the calculations in this paper, regardless ofthe true electron abundances on the grid.This treatment approximates radiative cooling in

shocked neutral gas well but underestimates metal linecooling, H-α cooling, and He-α cooling in ionized gasbecause the electron fraction is much higher than 0.01there. At postfront gas temperatures above ∼ 104 K,H-α and He-α cooling rates per atom can exceed thoseof the metals by four orders of magnitude. Given thatneutral H and metal fractions in the ionized gas at solarmetallicities are roughly equal (∼ 10−5), H-α and He-αcooling dominates the total Dalgarno & McCray curveinside the H II region. However, in the pure H simula-tions of this study we incur overestimates of at most 10%in temperature in the ionized gas because it is H recom-binational cooling that really controls postfront temper-atures, as we demonstrate below. Cutoff temperatureswere also incorporated in the runs, defined to be the gastemperature below which cooling is not applied to the gasenergy density. For the two runs discussed in this sec-tion we adopted cutoff and background of temperaturesof 100 K.A point source of ionizing UV flux was centered on

the polar coordinate grid with 200 radial zones and 180zones in the theta direction. The inner and outer ra-dial boundaries were 0.01 pc and 2.0 pc with reflectingand outflow boundary conditions, respectively. The in-ner and outer boundaries in the theta direction were π/4and 3π/4, respectively, with reflecting boundary condi-tions. We adopted this angle range to avoid the minuteCourant times associated with zones near the coordinatepoles due to their small angular dimensions. At the res-olution of this simulation we obtain minimum Couranttimes ten times greater over this range than at the poles.Our choice of reflecting boundary conditions could ex-clude the growth of long-wavelength modes, but the lin-ear stability analysis of Giuliani (1979) predicts thatshort-wavelength modes will initially dominate and then

later consolidate into larger structures.The density profile in both runs was hydrogen only,

with a flat central core of 1.0 × 104 cm−3 out to r = 0.2pc followed by an r−2 dropoff. At the outer boundary thedensity falls to ∼ 100 cm−3. The initial gas temperaturewas set to 100 K. We adopted a photon emission rate nph

of 1.0 × 1048 s−1 with energy 15.2 eV, with an energy perionization ǫΓ of 1.6 eV in order to maintain the ionizedgas temperature at 1.0 × 104 K. Theory predicts that ifthe initial Stromgren radius falls in the density gradientthe I-front will revert from D-type to R-type and over-run the envelope (Franco et al. 1990). For the centraldensity and emission rate of these runs, the Stromgrenradius

RS =

(

3nph

4παBn2c

)1/3

(10)

is 0.065 pc, entirely within the central core. The transi-tion to R-type is thus delayed.In the first run we do not perform radiative transfer

but instead repeat the simplified treatment applied inthe GSF models. Every hydrodynamical time step theequilibrium position of the I-front is computed along agiven radial ray by equating the sum of the case B re-combinations along the ray to the emission rate of thecentral source:

∫ rf

0

4πr2nenpαBdr = nph (11)

The gas temperature is then set to 1.0 × 104 K alongthe line of sight out to rf . After repeating this proce-dure for every value of theta the model is evolved for aCourant time. The position of the front thus changeseach time step as gas is rearranged on the grid by thehigh-temperature flow. We refer to this approach in thefollowing as “ionization equilibrium”. In practice, wefound it necessary to limit the cooling in a shocked zoneto be no greater than 90% of the energy remaining in thezone above the temperature cutoff of the cooling curve.Otherwise, the rather coarse hydrodynamical timestepscan allow explicit updates to the energy equation to com-pletely remove all energy within the cell. No R-typefronts ever arise in this approximation since the frontsby construction are always assumed to have reached theStromgren at any given time step.In the second run we transport the front across the

grid using radiative transfer scheme described in Sec.2.2, coupled to self-consistent photoionization and heat-ing as described in Sec. 2.3 (see also WN06). Inthe Garcia-Segura & Franco (1996) simulations, densityfluctuations with randomly-distributed amplitudes of atmost 1% were imposed on very zone to seed the forma-tion of shock instabilities. We also did this, holding thegas energy density constant to prevent pressure fluctua-tions from dispersing the perturbations. However, in ourmodel we only imposed these variations beyond radii of0.125 pc to prevent the onset of shadowing instabilitiesin the early R-type front before dynamical instabilitiesin the D-type front can form. We compare the evolutionof both models in Fig 2.

6

3.1. Ionization Equilibrium vs RadiationHydrodynamics

Both models confirm the prediction of Giuliani (1979)that the modes which grow fastest are those with thelargest wavelengths. Unstable modes begin to disruptthe shock at 9.5 kyr in the second run, with 13 spikes vis-ible at 28.5 kyr (panel (b)) but only 5 remaining at 148.4kyr (panel(f)). Vorticity in the flow is evident where thebases of the spikes join the flared regions. The instabili-ties remain D-type: they are always bounded by a denseshocked gas layer and their ionized interiors have timeto laterally expand as they elongate. The perturbationamplitudes never saturate in either model but continueto grow well into the nonlinear phase, from 0.1 pc at 28.5kyr to 0.5 - 1.0 pc at 148.4 kyr in the second run. Directquantification of their growth rates is problematic be-cause individual structures coalesce over time, but theirrapid elongation at later times is due to their descentdown the density gradient.There are noticeable differences in structure of the

fronts at early and intermediate times. While the ionizedfingers are numerous and narrow in both simulations atearly times (panels (a) and (b) of Fig 2), their morpholo-gies diverge after a few tens of kyr. Ionized spikes pushpast each other at random times through the shock in thesecond run, flaring sideways earlier than in the first runbecause they are not as collimated by their neighbors.In contrast, the spikes advance nearly in step with oneanother in the first model, remaining cylindrical out tomuch greater distances because of the parallel advance oftheir neighbors. There are also less of them: 7 spikes at0.3 pc in comparison to 13 in the second simulation. Thedifferences between the two models are most pronouncedat early and intermediate times, becoming less distinctas they enter highly nonlinear regimes.The departures are chiefly due to how the two numeri-

cal schemes capture the interaction of the front with theshocked neutral shell. The topology of the instabilityis sensitive to how the inner shell is photoevaporated.Ionization equilibrium abruptly assigns temperatures of1 × 104 K to the fluid elements on the inner surfacethat are capable of being ionized. Had they instead beenincrementally heated and ablated, as in the radiation hy-drodynamical scheme, their subsequent expansion wouldhave created a larger number of cracks in the shell dis-tributed over time, yielding the larger number of ionizedfingers observed in the second run. Although costlier,full radiation transport is necessary to model the actualdeformation of the shocked shell. Initial disparities in thedeformation of the shell by the two algorithms lead to themuch greater differences in morphology at intermediatetimes evident in panels (c) and (d) of Fig 2.In one-dimensional calculations the two algorithms

predict I-front positions to within a few percent of eachother at early times but diverge by more than 10% atlater times, as shown in Fig 3. This agreement holds onlyso long as the front is D-type. Ionization equilibrium ap-proximations would not fare as well if the front becameD-type in the r−2 gradient or in other stratified media.It would fail altogether if the front executes transitionsfrom D-type to R-type or vice versa, as is common incosmological H II regions. We have found that updatesto velocities should be performed on photoheating time

scales rather than the Courant time to capture the trueacceleration of fluid elements by the front in power-lawdensity gradients (WN06).

4. THREE-DIMENSIONAL D-TYPE INSTABILITIES

We extended the radiative transfer calculation in sec-tion 3 to three dimensions using a spherical polar coor-dinate grid with 200 radial zones and 180 zones in thetheta and phi directions. The inner and outer radialboundaries were again 0.01 pc and 2.0 pc with reflectingand outflow boundary conditions, respectively. The an-gle boundaries were again chosen to be π/4 and 3π/4 inphi and theta with reflecting boundary conditions. Weapply the same randomly perturbed density profile asbefore to the grid, with the energy per ionization ǫΓ setto 1.6 eV to ensure a postfront gas temperature of 1.0 ×

104 K.Our first run (S31) had cutoff and background tem-

peratures of 1000 K and 10 K, respectively, while oursecond run (S22) had cutoff and background tempera-tures of 100 K. Metal lines cannot fully cool shocked gasin the first case so the shell is thinner than in an adia-batic flow but not as dense (or cold) as when the metalsare free to cool the gas down to the background tem-perature. Garcia-Segura & Franco (1996) neverthelessfound instabilities to readily form in these circumstancesin their two-dimensional simulations. The lower cutoff inthe second run is intended to produce a relatively cold,dense shell that will break up more violently. In bothof these models nph was again chosen to be 1.0 × 1048

s−1 so that the Stromgren sphere would reside within thecore.

4.1. S31 Instability

In Fig (4) we show φ = π/2 slices of the evolution ofthe ionization front in the S31 run at 29.5 kyr, 70 kyr,and 100 kyr (the total time for which the front was fol-lowed in the 1996 experiments). In panels (a) and (b)the perturbations are seen to be dominated by short-wavelength modes at early times that later merge intothe longer-wavelength modes in panels (c) and (d), inaccord with linear stability analysis. The initial wave-lengths are of the order of the shell thickness. Unableto completely cool, the shocked shell becomes thicker asneutral gas accumulates onto it, acquiring turbulent mo-tions as it evolves. The instabilities persist to 200 kyr inthese three-dimensional calculations as seen in panels (e)and (f) but saturate without the prominent growth ex-hibited in the GSF two-dimensional models. The turbu-lence in the shell appears to prevent the unstable modesfrom breaking out. The maximum density attained bythe clumps in the course of the simulation is 4.99 × 104

cm−3; pronounced clumping is visible at 177 kyr in panel(f).

4.2. S22 Instability

The ionization front breaks through the shock and es-capes much further down the stratified envelope in theS22 run, as dramatically illustrated in Fig (5). We showφ = π/2 slices of the front for this model at 20.8 kyr, 67.9kyr, and 124.5 kyr. Radiation flares outward throughthe cracks in this more violently fragmenting, colder,denser shell, and the dominant growth modes over time

7

Fig. 2.— Dynamical instability in a D-type I-front propagating out of an r−2 density gradient with metal line cooling. Panels (a), (c),and (e): number densities at 28.5 kyr, 76.1 kyr, and 148.4 kyr for a front evolved assuming simple ionization equilibrium. Panels (b), (d),and (f): density evolution of an I-front transported across the grid with full radiative transfer at 28.5 kyr, 76.1 kyr, and 148.4 kyr.

are again those with the greatest wavelengths. This mo-tion is visible in the large dark neutral patches cuttingacross some of the ionized flares in temperature panel (e)of Fig (5). Comparison of panels (c) and (e) demonstratethe transience of these features. Newly ionized gas in theouter regions of the flares expand laterally as the insta-bilities propagate, creating dark, rarefied zones in thecorresponding density panels. The unstable modes ad-vance as D-type, given their time scales of expansion aswell as because they remain bounded by shocked gas thatis visible as a thin, lighter hued density layer in the outer

edges of the flares. The maximum density of the gas inthis run is 2.08 × 105 cm−3, greater than in the previousrun due to the higher degree of postshock cooling. Thethin radial segments of cool zones visible in temperaturepanels (c) and (e) are cold, dense shell fragments of theshocked shell not yet ionized by the front. These frag-ments can be seen to originate in the cold shell becausethey extend from the base of the instabilities and radi-ate outward. They are overtaken on either side by hotionized outflows, with the neutral parcels of gas closestto the central source eventually becoming ionized them-

8

0 50 100 150 200time (kyr)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

radi

us (

pc)

IE RHD

Fig. 3.— One-dimensional I-front positions in the ionization equi-librium approximation and with radiative transfer

selves. Their large densities stand out in relief against thesurrounding dimmer regions in panels (d) and (f). Thecooling of the fragments down to the cutoff temperatureis due their high densities rather than some instability inthe explicit updates to the energy equation. Our integra-tion scheme prevents any energy loss greater than 10%over the time step on which hydrodynamic updates areperformed. Large clumps of gas can be seen to persistto late times as they are blown outward by the front inpanel (f).There are clear qualitative differences between the un-

stable flow in the two-dimensional radiation hydrody-namical model in the last section and this run that canonly be attributed to their dimensionality, given thatboth otherwise employ the same physics. First, trans-verse flow of gas into the plane of the image from aboveand below is evident in some of the dark patches in theouter regions of the ionized fingers in panels (c) and (e).These are not cold dense shell fragments (as the densitypanels attest) but instead are neutral gas crowded intothe plane of the image by adjacent instabilities. Sec-ond, the shapes of the fingers differ in the two runs: thestructures in the three-dimensional model are both morenarrow and plentiful than in the two-dimensional run.Less flaring occurs in the three-dimensional fingers be-cause they are partially collimated by neighboring flowsthat are not possible in the two-dimensional models. Thegeometry of cracks in the shell at the base of the insta-bilities may also be altered by the additional degree offreedom in the flow.The S31 and S22 data confirm that I-front breakout

from the envelope is determined by both the degree offragmentation of the shell (which is governed by the ef-ficiency of cooling in the shocked gas) and the pressureratio of the ionized and background gas. At early stagesof the instability there are clear differences in the initial

scales of the perturbations that we suspect, but have notconfirmed, are due the thickness of the shocked gas shellat the time of initial fragmentation. The shell thicknessesvary from five to ten zones at early times, within the nu-merical resolution of our mesh. The initial scales of thesedeformities in part differentiate the later topologies of theS31 and S22 instabilities.We further note that the absence of runaway instabil-

ities in our S31 model may in part be due to RS beingless than rc. In one dimension, somewhat surprisinglywe find that the density envelope actually confines thefront behind the shock at distances far beyond the prob-lem boundaries in our calculations, in contrast to therelatively quick breakout that would occur had the ini-tial Stromgren radius fallen within the gradient. It istherefore likely that the perturbed density profile wouldprevent further growth of the instabilities until they ap-proach the breakout radii found in our one-dimensionalcalculations discussed below. Accurate models of I-fronttransitions are therefore key to capturing the correctgrowth of instabilities and demand full radiation hydro-dynamical treatment of the ionized flows.If the Stromgren radius lies beyond the flat central core

in the one-dimensional density profile of eq. 3 then itsvalue is given by

Rω = RS

[

3− 2ω

3+

2ω

3

(

rcRS

)3]1/(3−2ω)

(

RS

rc

)2ω/(3−2ω)

,

(12)

where RS is the Stromgren radius for the front in a uni-formmedium. If Rω > rc the I-front executes the classicaltransition to D-type but then soon reverts to R-type asit descends the gradient. The Franco et al. (1990) anal-yses do not address the evolution of the front when it isinitially confined to the core (RS < rc), as in these mod-els. To determine the outcome of the front in this regimewe performed two sets of one-dimensional calculationsin the density profile used earlier but without perturba-tions. We extended the outer boundary of the mesh to20 pc with 2000 radial zones to preserve the spatial res-olution. One set had a central photon rate nph = 1.0× 1048 s−1 as before while nph = 5.0 × 1049 s−1 in theother set. This larger rate sets Rω = 0.26 pc, outside thecentral plateau. One calculation in each set had a cut-off temperature of 1000 K while the other had a cutoffof 100 K; the background temperature in each was 100K. The evolution of the front was followed for 1.3 Myrin the first set and for 45 kyr in the second set (muchless time is required when there is rapid escape down thegradient). Flow profiles for all four calculations appearin Fig 6.Even out to 20 pc, ten times the distance to which our

earlier models were followed, the density and ionizationfraction profiles in the left panel of Fig 6 reveal that theI-front remains trapped by the shock at the lower pho-ton rates. The 100 K shell is only half as thick as the1000 K shell but has ten times its density. The higherrecombination rate in the cooler shell offsets its smallerwidth to confine the front. Note that radiative coolingin both cases lowers the shell to the cutoff temperature.When we extend the grid boundary to 200 pc at the

9

Fig. 4.— Dynamical instability in a D-type front propagating outward along an r−2 density gradient with metal line cooling, run S31.Panels (a), (c), and (e): temperature evolution at 20.8 kyr, 96.2 kyr, and 177.4 kyr. Panels (b), (d), and (f): density evolution at 20.8 kyr,96.2 kyr, and 177.4.

same spatial resolution (thereby ensuring that the frontremains on the grid for the 10 Myr lifetime of a star withthese emission rates (Schaerer 2002)), we find that thefront finally breaks through the 1000 K shell at 90 pcand through the 100 K shell at 64 pc. In these calcula-tions the shock gains strength as it descends the densitygradient. Line cooling still collapses gas into a relativelythin layer at the base of the shell but cannot cool all thematerial that accumulates as the shock accelerates so theshell heats and thickens. When the shell’s outer layersreach 10,000 K, collisional ionizations assist the I-front

to break through the shock.On the other hand, the right panel demonstrates that if

RS = 0.26 pc > rc, the front breaks free of the shock justpast RS as predicted by Franco et al. (1990). Revertingto R-type, the front quickly exits the spherical cloud,leaving behind a steepening ionized core shock at thesite of detachment as seen in the density panel. Littlegas dynamical evolution occurs over the time in whichthe front crosses the grid. The higher density of thecooler shell slightly delays I-front breakout (by ∼ 2 -3 kyr). This implied that instability growth would be

10

Fig. 5.— D-type ionization front instability in an r−2 density gradient with metal line cooling, run S22. Panels (a), (c), and (e):temperature evolution at 20.8 kyr, 67.9 kyr, and 124.5 kyr. Panels (b), (d), and (f): density evolution at 20.8 kyr, 67.9 kyr, and 124.5 kyr.

particularly explosive in cases where RS lies beyond thecore radius.

4.3. S31 Breakout Instability

To test this conjecture we devised a new S31 run withnph = 5.0 × 1049 s−1. We imposed random variations onthe density as before but beyond radii of 0.29 pc in orderto allow the I-front to become fully D-type at Rω = 0.26pc before encountering the perturbations. Temperatureand density images for φ = π/2 in this calculation areshown in Fig (7) for 9.4, 13.2, and 15.1 kyr. Radiation

breakout through cracks in the shock rapidly ensues andthe front erupts through the envelope in spikes whichare R-type, as evidenced by the short escape times andthe lack of hydrodynamic response in the ionized fingers.The slightly jagged edges in some of the spikes are arti-facts of the spherical polar coordinate mapping to carte-sian coordinates. Fragmentation of the shell is visible atearly times as bright dots in the shell in the density pan-els but it soon disappears as the clumps are photoionizedand then dispersed on time scales setby the sound speedin the postfront gas. The maximum density achieved in

11

Fig. 6.— Hydrodynamical profiles for ionization fronts in a spherically-symmetric r−2 density stratification. Solid lines are I-front profileswith gas cooling truncated at 1000 K while dotted lines denote profiles in which gas cooling is halted below 100 K. Left panel: RS < rc.1000 K profiles are at 0.48 Myr, 0.82 Myr, and 1.37 Myr while the 100 K profiles are at 0.7 Myr, 1.01 Myr, and 1.26 Myr. Right panel:RS > rc. 1000 K profiles are at 36 kyr, 40 kyr, and 44 Kyr while the 100 K profiles are at 32 kyr, 38 kyr, and 42 kyr.

this simulation was 5.47 × 104 cm−3. The spikes remainfairly narrow because they elongate rapidly in compari-son to hydrodynamical time scales, but they do begin todrive weak transverse shocks at their base as the ionizedgas begins to laterally expand. These unstable modes donot fall in any of the categories discussed so far becausethey evolve as fast R-type structures.

5. R-TYPE SHADOW INSTABILITIES

In this test, a plane-parallel R-type ionization frontenters the yz-face of a rectangular box with a uniformgas density except for a spherical bump slightly offsetfrom the face of entry. The density in the bump varieslinearly in radius from the ambient value at its center toeither 50% below or above this value at its surface. Oursimulation volume has a length of 1.0 pc along the x-axis and 0.25 pc along the y and z-axes, with 1000, 250,and 250 zones in the x, y, and z directions respectively.The gas number density in the box is 1000 cm−3 and ishydrogen only. The temperature of the gas was set to72 K, yielding a sound speed cs of 1 km/s. The fixedenergy ǫΓ per photoionization was 0.8 eV to yield initialpostfront temperatures of 104. The incident photon fluxalong the x-axis at the entry face was 3.0× 1011 cm−2 s−1

to approximate that of an O star at its Stromgren radius.The radius of the perturbation was 0.0125 pc and waspositioned 0.05 pc along the x-axis and centered in theyz-plane. Reflecting and outflow boundary conditionswere applied at the 0 pc and 1.0 pc faces, respectively,with reflecting boundaries along the other four faces.Our physical parameters for this test are similar to

those of the two-dimensional simulations of Williams(1999), except for cooling. In those models near-isothermality was enforced by setting γ = 1.1 and theinternal energy of the ionized gas to be constant to guar-antee cs ∼ 10 km/sec. In contrast, we applied the samecooling algorithm described earlier with a cutoff temper-ature of 1000 K. The front reaches a Stromgren distance

of 0.32 pc at approximately 1000 yr:

xStr =F0

n2αB(13)

where F0 is the photon flux (cm−2 s−1), n is the numberdensity of neutral hydrogen and αB is the case B re-combination coefficient. The simulation volume was par-titioned into 25 uniform tiles, with five divisions alongboth the y-axis and z-axis and each tile spanning thelength of the volume in the x direction.We show xy slices at z = 0 of the temperature and den-

sity evolution of the shadowing instability in Figs 8 and9 due to an underdense perturbation at 1.9 kyr, 4.9 kyr,and 12.6 kyr. At 1.9 kyr the front has transitioned toD-type and the original corrugation in the R-type frontis well into the nonlinear growth phase. The expand-ing photoevaporated perturbation is faintly visible on theleft of the figure. The twin peaks in the instability arexy slices through a ringed jet that is due to the radialdensity profile of the spherical bump: the R-type frontpreferentially advances along the lines of sight parallel tothe x-axis that cut the underdense regions close to thesurface of the bump. Along the line of sight piercing thebump through its center, the front advances at nearlythe same rate as in the unperturbed medium becausethe densities along this path through the bump are closeto those in the surrounding gas.At later times cooling in the shell fractures the insta-

bility into multiple jets with highly nonlinear growth andmorphologies reminiscent of the density structures visi-ble in the two-dimensional numerical experiments. Notemperature images of the 1999 work are available so itis not possible to directly compare the distribution ofionized and shocked gas within the jets or verify the ex-istence of the ionized extensions into the shock that arepresent in our models. The unperturbed regions of thefront snowplow gas into a somewhat broader shell thanin the Williams (1999) models because the gas can onlycool to 1000 K. The length of the jet in our model (0.14

12

Fig. 7.— Run S31 with Rω > rc. Panels (a), (c), and (e): temperature evolution at 9.4, 13.2, and 15.1 kyr. Panels (b), (d), and (f):density evolution at 9.4, 13.2, and 15.1 kyr.

pc) is somewhat shorter than in the Williams runs duein part to the lower ionizing flux. However, intrinsic dif-ferences between two and three-dimensional flows mayalso come into play, as the additional degree of freedomopens transverse flow channels that may quench the in-stability. Indeed, some vorticity is evident in the flow atlater times, a possible signature that instability growthis coupling to turbulent motion in the gas and being re-duced. The densities in the jets range from 19.0 cm−3

to 3.72 × 104 cm−3, a factor of 4 or 5 lower than inthe 1999 experiments. The greater maxima in the earlier

work in part arise from the higher density jumps permit-ted across the isothermal shocks in those models as wellas from the lower temperatures to which the postshockgas can cool. As the central jet advances it widens asionized gas in its interior expands perpendiculary to theflow.Two features also worth mention are the density knots

in the shock located above and below the midplane of thejets at their base at 1.9 kyr. As the front advances, radi-ation escapes past the knots and forms jets that migrateacross the face of the shock as they elongate. Shortly

13

Fig. 8.— Temperature evolution of an I-front shadow instability due to an underdense spherical underdensity: (a) 1.9 kyr, (b) 4.9 kyr,and (c) 12.6 kyr.

thereafter, smaller disturbances in the shock materializefurther from the base of the central jet, possibly triggeredby acoustic waves along the shock or perhaps merely nu-merical artifacts. These density fluctuations quickly cooland create cracks in the shock through which ionizingphotons penetrate, forming smaller subsidiary jets thatlater merge with the widening central jet in complicatedhydrodynamical flows. The original knots are present inthe two-dimensional runs and are attributed by Williamsto a type of zero-wavelength odd-even numerical instabil-ity (zero-wavelength in the sense that it would be mani-fest at all resolutions). The phenomena apparently arisebecause the I-front itself is not resolved by the grid. Justas postshock oscillations can come to dominate shocked

flow not broadened by a few zones with artificial viscos-ity in lower-order hydrodynamical schemes, under certaincircumstances sharp I-fronts can preferentially advancein an oscillatory fashion across adjacent zones. Williamsremoved this effect in his simulations by setting the pho-toionization cross section to be a function of zone width(in direct analogy to artificial viscosity), hence broad-ening the front. Practical applications employing mul-tifrequency radiative transfer (for Population III stellarand miniquasar hard spectra) may obviate this featurebecause the spread in photon mean free paths would nat-urally widen I-fronts in many environments without re-course to artificial means.

6. CONCLUSION

14

Fig. 9.— Density evolution of an I-front shadow instability due to the spherical underdensity: (a) 1.9 kyr, (b) 4.9 kyr, and (c) 12.6 kyr.

For the past ten years, the general paradigm of ioniza-tion front instabilities in the ISM has been one of sword-like structures with unrestrained amplitude growth in awide variety of environments. Our new models temperthis view with saturated modes that likely drive turbu-lent flows in some instances. The morphology of the S31instability in particular suggests that some modes mayefficiently drive turbulence in the shocked shell, with pos-sible implications for time scales of subsequent star for-mation in the region. The numerous short-wavelengthionized spikes in the shock at early times later gatherinto fewer long-wavelength structures, so energy is trans-ported at first from smaller scales to larger ones by theflow. Later, these large scale flows crumple into eversmaller scales as the saturated instabilities devolve into

shear motions and develop the vorticity evident in theKelvin-Helmholtz features appearing in panel (f) of Fig4. We expect this process to be more prominent in actualmolecular clouds because the r−2 profile of a core trun-cates in relatively high intra-cloud densities that wouldfurther flatten the instabilities. While our current meshcan resolve the shell breakup and ionized fingers well,these features would have to be evolved for longer timeson finer grids able to capture turbulent cascades to deter-mine the extent to which turbulence arises in the cloud.Nevertheless, the possibility that ionization front insta-bilities together with winds from massive stars and su-pernova explosions may provide an important source ofturbulent support in star forming clouds in the galaxytoday is an intriguing one.

15

We find that the dimensionality of our models distin-guishes them from previous work more than their im-proved physics. The structures emerging in our simu-lations bear resemblance to many objects visible in theISM today. The globules and pillars in the S31 run arereminiscent of those seen in the Eagle nebula while thelong wispy extensions in the S22 run are comparable tothose in many planetary nebula such as NGC 6751. Theclumping that is prevalent in the galaxy is also evidentin our models. In reality, ionization front instabilitiescompete with wind-blown structures and blast waves toproduce the panoply of features in the local interstel-lar medium. How all three act in concert to create thecircumstellar environments of massive stars and gamma-ray bursts is an important question to be addressed infuture work. Likewise, how H II region instabilities inter-act with the magnetic fields threading molecular cloudsremains poorly understood. We expect that unstablemodes will not be seriously suppresed on parsec scalesbecause of the relative magnitudes of ionized gas andmagnetic field pressures, but their evolution could be al-tered on larger scales as they approach pressure equilib-rium with their surroundings.A question of relevance to cosmological reionization is

whether I-front instabilities arise in the primordial cloudsof primeval massive stars and protogalaxies. In pristinegas shocks must resort to atomic hydrogen line coolingand Compton cooling at high redshifts, which are farless efficient processes than metal line emission. If theshocked flows are non-radiating, no Vishniac instabili-ties can develop or be amplified by radiation so the frontswould be stable. On the other hand, I-front shocks ac-celerate if they emerge from cosmological minihalos withdensity gradients steeper than r−2. Their exit may thusbe subject to Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities that ionizingradiation could blossom into much larger structures. Wefurther note that hard Population III or miniquasar UVand x-ray spectra can significantly broaden comologicalI-fronts, and it is unclear what impact the layer of partialionization will have on instability formation. These ques-

tions together with how I-fronts sculpt gas clouds in theearly intergalactic medium will be the focus of studies tocome.Finally, we caution that all our models adopted the

on-the-spot approximation, in which recombination pho-tons are assumed to be reabsorbed in their zone of originbefore escaping. In reality, reprocessed radiation isotrop-ically emitted within the ionized fingers may halt theirgrowth by eroding them from within. Recombinationradiation is believed to dominate the photon budget inthe outer radii of centrally concentrated H II regions likethose examined in our study (Ritzerveld 2005). Directtransport of diffuse ionizing radiation exhausts currentray tracing techniques, so the implementation of flux-limited diffusion for recombination photons in ZEUS-MPis currently underway in order to study their influence oninstabilities in future models. Nevertheless, we expectthat diffuse radiation will at most blunt the instabilities,not prevent their formation or destroy them because thefragmentation of the shell and breakout of the radiationthrough the cracks is a very robust feature of the fronts.

We thank the anonymous referee, whose insightful cri-tique signicantly improved the quality of this paper. DWis grateful for useful discussions concerning this workwith Guillermo Garcia-Segura, Alex Heger, Mordecai-Mark Mac Low and Marcelo Alvarez, as well as for con-versations with with Hajime Susa and Naoki Yoshida atthe University of Washington INT workshop “The FirstStars and Evolution of the Early Universe” held fromJune 19 to July 21, 2006. He also thanks Brian O’Sheafor his software package for mapping the spherical po-lar coordinate data in this study onto cartesian grids forthe images in this paper. This work was carried outunder the auspices of the National Nuclear Security Ad-ministration of the U.S. Department of Energy at LosAlamos National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396. The simulations were performed atSDSC and NCSA under NRAC allocation MCA98N020.

REFERENCES

Arquilla, R., & Goldsmith, P. F. 1985, ApJ, 297, 436Axford, W. I. 1964, ApJ, 140, 112Bertoldi, F. 1989, ApJ, 346, 735Brand, P. W. J. L. 1981, MNRAS, 197, 217Canto, J., Raga, A., Steffen, W., & Shapiro, P. 1998, ApJ, 502,

695Capriotti, E. R. 1973, ApJ, 179, 495Dale, J. E., Bonnell, I. A., & Whitworth, A. P. 2007, MNRAS, 42Dalgarno, A. & McCray, R. A. 1972, ARA&A, 10, 375Franco, J., Diaz-Miller, R. L., Freyer, T., & Garcia-Segura, C.

1998, ASP Conf. Ser. 141: Astrophysics From Antarctica, 141,154

Franco, J., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Bodenheimer, P. 1990, ApJ, 349,126

Freyer, T., Hensler, G., & Yorke, H. W. 2003, ApJ, 594, 888Frieman, E. A. 1954, ApJ, 120, 18Fuller, T. M. & Couchman, H. M. P. 2000, ApJ, 544, 6Garcia-Segura, G., & Franco, J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 171Giuliani, J. L. 1979, ApJ, 233, 280Gregorio Hetem, J. C., Sanzovo, G. C., & Lepine, J. R. D. 1988,

A&AS, 76, 347Hayes, J. C., Norman, M. L., Fiedler, R. A., Bordener, J. O., Li,

P. S., Clark, S. E., ud-Doula, A., Mac Low, M. -M.,astro-ph/0511545.

Kahn, F. D. 1958, Reviews of Modern Physics, 30, 1058

Mac Low, M.-M., & Norman, M. L. 1993, ApJ, 407, 207Mellema, G., Raga, A. C., Canto, J., Lundqvist, P., Balick, B.,

Steffen, W., & Noriega-Crespo, A. 1998, A&A, 331, 335Mizuta, A., Kane, J. O., Pound, M. W., Remington, B. A.,

Ryutov, D. D., & Takabe, H. 2005, ApJ, 621, 803Mizuta, A., Kane, J. O., Pound, M. W., Remington, B. A.,

Ryutov, D. D., & Takabe, H. 2006, ApJ, 647, 1151Newman, R. C., & Axford, W. I. 1967, ApJ, 149, 571Osterbrock, D. Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active

Galactic Nuclei, University Science Books 1989.Ritzerveld, J. 2005, A&A, 439, L23Schaerer, D. 2002, A&A, 382, 28Shapiro, P. R., Iliev, I. T., & Raga, A. C. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 753Soker, N. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 562Spitzer, L. J. 1954, ApJ, 120, 1Sysoev, N. E. 1997, Astronomy Letters, 23, 409Vandervoort, P. O. 1962, ApJ, 135, 212Vishniac, E. T. 1983, ApJ, 274, 152Whalen, D., Abel, T., & Norman, M. L. 2004, ApJ, 610, 14Whalen, D., & Norman, M. L. 2006, ApJS, 162, 281Williams, R. J. R. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 789Williams, R. J. R. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 693Williams, R. J. R., Dyson, J. E., & Hartquist, T. W. 2000,

MNRAS, 314, 315

16

Yoshida, N., Oh, S. P., Kitayama, T., & Hernquist, L. 2006,astro-ph/0610819