ASSESSMfNT REPORT IQqq8 - British Columbia

D

II

o

o

D

0

o

o

o

Q

Do

D

o

u

u

u

I MINERAL RE O C S Pl NCH

ASSESSMfNT REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IQqq8SUMMARY

CONCLUSIONS ii

INTRODUCTION 1

PROPERTY AND OWNERSHIP 2

LOCATION AND ACCESS 2

PHYSIOGRAPHY 3

GEOLOGY 3

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY 4

Instrumentation and Theory 4

a Magnetic Survey 4

b VLF EM Survey 4

c Induced Polarization Survey 5

Field Procedure and Reduction of Observations 8

a Magnetics 8

b VLF EM 9

c Induced Polarization 9

Resul ts 11

a Magnetic Survey 11

b VLF EM Survey 11

c Induced Polarization Survey 12

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY 13

Survey Procedure 13

Laboratory Testing Procedure 13

Treatment of Data 13

Results 14

Copper14

Lead 14

Zinc 15

Silver 15

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 15

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 17

GEOPHYSICIST S CERTIFICATE 18

AFFIDAVIT OF EXPENSES 19

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LID

1

l

D

D

D

0I

o

oJ

o

D

0I

1lu

D

o

oI jl

u

I

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS I

MAPS At back of report

Location Map 1 8 600 000

Claim Map 1 50 000

FIGURE

1

2

MAPS In Pockets SHEET

Magnetic SurveyData and Contours 1 2 500 1

VLF EM SurveyFraser Filtered

Dip angle 1 2 500 2

Induced Polarization SurveyChargeability for N 2 1 2 500 3

Induced Polarization SurveyApparent ResistivityData and Contours 1 2 500 4

Induced Polarization SurveyResistivityI P Pseudosections 1 2 500 5

1 2 500 6

1 2 500 7

1 2 500 8

1 2 500 9

1 2 500 10

Induced Polarization SurveySelf Potential Profiles

Soil GeochemistryCopper Values

Soil GeochemistryLead Values

Soil GeochemistryZinc Values

Soil GeochemistrySilver Values

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD

J

J

o

o

o

J

o

DIL

o

g

J

D

D

Uo

U

J

J

i

SUMMARY

During the summer of 1981 extensive geophysical and geochemical

programs were carried out on the Late Claim near Merritt

British Columbia An east west grid of 16 lines was established

on the property and magnetic and VLF EM readings taken these

were subsequently plotted and contoured An induced polarization

survey was carried out along every second line and plans pre

pared showing chargeability resistivity and self potential

Soil samples were collected at 25 m intervals along all the

survey lines and tested for copper lead zinc and silver

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of outcrop is a hindexance to both the use of geology

and geochemistry as prospecting tools on this property The

soil geochemistry anomalies revealed are consequently small

with the possible exception of copper and scattered The

magnetic survey revealed one area of steep field gradients

typical of underlying volcanic rocks with magnetite content

It is conceivable that the magnetic highs represent more

mineralized regions and the lows may be caused by alteration

however it is not justifiable to recommend drilling targets

on the magnetic data alone unless there are some coincident


J

l

J

J

D

Dl

J

D

Q

J

D

J

J

ii

anomalies from other surveys Similarly the VLF EM anomalies

although showing up some strong structural trends did not

correspond to other features

In their report Kallock and Goldsmith state No further

exploration of the property is recommended unless strongly

anomalous zones are detected with recent geochemical and geo

physical surveys It is considered that strong anomalies

have not been revealed however if further exploration is

to be carried out it is recommended that drilling be used

to investigate the IP anomaly on line S OON anomaly d

Trenching could be useful in revealing the cause of the VLF

EM anomalies Further geophysics on the claim should not be

employed unless positive results are obtained from the drilling

of the IP feature


w

J

J

J

o

B

o

o

fJo

Dnu

D

U

o

J

ud

GEOPHYSICAL GEOCHEMICAL REPORT

ON

MAGNETIC VLF EM INDUCED POLARIZATION

AND SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY SURVEYS

OVER THE

LATE MINERAL CLAIM

MERRITT AREA

NICOLA MINING DIVISION

BRITISH COLUMBIA

INTRODUCTION

This report discusses the theory instrumentation field pro

cedure and results of magnetic VLF EM induced polarizationIP and soil geochemistry surveys carried out over the Late

Claim near Merritt British Columbia The field work was com

pleted in various phases within the period May 12th to October

20th 1981

Outcropping Triassic volcanics on the claim contain patches of

disseminated chalcopyrite and chalcocite the aim of the geo

chemical and geophysical work was to detect surface and depth

expressions respecti vely of any significant base metal

mineralization on the property The use of geophysics and

geochemistry was recommended by Kelly 1980 in his geological

report on the property

A survey grid of 16 east west lines at a nominal spacing of


J

1

J

o

nD

Jo

o

D

o

D

o

D

Df1

J

2

100 m was laid out over the property Magnetic and VLF EM

readings and soil samples were then taken at 25 m intervals

along these lines The IP survey was carried out on every

second line using a pole dipole array and taking readingsat up to five levels

The magnetic and VLF EM results have been presented as

plans the IP results are presented as four drawings

ability for n 2 apparent resistivity for n 2

sections and a plan of the self potential gradientsoil samples were analyzed for copper lead zinc and

and the values plotted and contoured

contour

charge

pseudothe 851

silver

PROPERTY AND OWNERSHIP

The Late Claim comprises 9 units as shown in Figure 2 and

described below

CLAIM NAME RECORD NO EXPIRY DATE

May 23 1982

NO OF UNITS

Late 9 623 5

The property is wholly owned by Inter Continental Energy Corp

oration of Vancouver British Columbia

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The property is located 41 km southeast of Merritt B C at

geographical coordinates 490 49 N 1200 26 W Access is

gained by turning off the Merritt Princeton road Highway 5

4 1 2 km south of Aspen Grove gravel and dirt roads then

lead through Kentucky Lakes 28 km to the claim A dirt track

runs diagonally across the property


J

1

rJ

o

B

oD

o

D

o

L

D

D

J

o

D

J

J

3

PHYSIOGRAPHY

The claim lies on the Thompson Plateau just to the east of

the Cascade Mountains part of the Coast Mountains of the

Canadian Cordillera Total elevation on the property which

is mostly covered by coniferous forest is about 150 m from

1 350 to 1 500 m a s l Thumb Lake which lies partly vlithin

the claim is at an elevation of approximately 1 357 m

GEOLOGY

Although the property is mostly covered by glacial depositsor the waters of Thumb Lake the underlying rock type is

believed to be Upper Triassic volcanic flows and breccias

of the Nicola Group This rock unit in some areas is host

to economic ore deposits copper in particular usually in

association with granodiorite intrusives

vicinity of

Late Claim

In his summary of previous exploration in the

the claims Kelly 1980 hypothesized that the

lay on the eastern limb of a major north trendingand that Thumb Lake marked a WNW trending shear

may have served as a conduit for mineralizing

emanating from granodiorite intrusions to the east

gave rise to metallogenic zoning away from Thumb

copper deposition near the lake then silver to

east and zinc to the northwest

synclinezone which

solutions

This then

Lake with

the north

Kallock and Goldsmith 1981 found neither contradictory nor

confirmatory evidence for these theories They mapped andesite

and andesite breccia to the north and east of Thumb Lake

and augite andesite to the southwest Several dykes were noted

ranging in composition from daci tic to diori tic One north

east trending shear zone vIas observed near the prospect pit


J

J

1u

U

EJ

D

o

D

D

o

D

o

D

of

L

J

J

U

4

and calcite venation implied mainly north south planes of

weakness

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

Instrumentation and Theory

al Magnetic Survey

The magnetic survey was carried out with a model MP 2 proton

precession magnetometer manufactured by Scintrex Limited

of Concord Ontario This instrument reads out directly in

gammas to an accuracy of 1 gamma over a range of 20 000

100 0006 The operating temperature range is 350 to 500

C and its gradient tolerance is up to 5 000j per meter

Only two commonly occurring minerals are strongly magnetic

magnetite and pyrrhotite magnetic surveys are therefore used

to detect the presence of these minerals in varying concen

trations Magnetics is also useful as a reconnaissance tool

for mapping geologic lithology and structure since different

rock types have different background amounts of magnetiteand or pyrrhotite

bl VLF EM Survey

The Sabre Instruments Ltd model

transmittingfield

27 VLF EM receiver was

station to take readingstuned

of the

to the Seattle

dip angle of the

In all electromagnetic prospecting a transmitter producesan alternating magnetic field primary by passing a strong

alternating current usually through a coil of wire If a con

ductive mass such as a sulphide body is within this magneticfield a secondary alternating electric current is induced


J

J

o

o

J

D

o

D

o

o

0

o

o

J

J

5

within it which in turn induces

that distorts the primary field

is measured by the VLF EM receiver

a secondary magnetic field

It is this distortion that

Most EM instruments employ frequencies ranging from a few

hundred to a few thousand Hertz The VLF EM method uses a

frequency range from 16 to 24 KHz and is therefore more sen

sitive to bodies of lower conductivity VLF E l anomalies are

therefore often caused by one or more of the following electro

lyte filled fault or shear zones clay beds porous horizons

carbonaceous sediments e g graphitic relatively low con

ductivity sulphide bodies and lithological contacts The precise

cause of an anomaly is consequently difficult to determine

and VLF EM surveys preferable should not be interpreted without

a good geological knowledge of the property and or the assist

ance of other geopnysical and geochemical surveys

A survey line crossing a buried conductor will record dip

angle values that are negative upward dipping before the

conductor and positive after it as the magnetic component

of the field is deflected up over the body The inflection

point zero crossing on the profile should lie directly over

the causative body

c Induced Polarization Survey

The induced polarization transmitter was a Phoenix Instruments

model IPT 1 powered by a MG 2 60 Briggs Stratton generatorThe transmitter current varied from 0 75 to 2 2A The receiver

was a Huntec Mark IV operating in

is state of the art equipmentfunctions programmeable through the

the time domain mode This

with software controlled

front panel


J

J

U

o

D

D

D01

01L

o

o

J

oD

o

o

J

J

6

Following current switch off a delay time of 300

introduced before the voltage decay curve was sampled65 ms wide windows The instrument readout was the

ability

ms was

by ten

charge

The theory of the induced polarization effect is as follows

When a voltage is applied to the ground electric current

flows mainly in the electrolyte filled capillaries in the

rock If the capillaries also contain certain mineral particlesthat transport current by electrons most sulphides some

oxides and graphi te then the ionic charges build up at the

particle electrolyte interface positive ones where the current

enters the particle and negative ones where it leaves This

accumulation of charge creates a voltage that tends to oppose

the current flow across the interface When the current is

switched off the created voltage slowly decreases as the

accumulated ions diffuse back into the electrolyte This type

of induced polarization phenomenon is known as electrode polarization

A similar effect occurs if clay particles are pr sent in the

conducting medium Charged clay particles attract oppositely

charged ions from the surrounding electrolyte when the current

stops the ions slowly diffuse back to their equilibruim state

This process is known as membrane polar ization and gives rise

to induced polarization effects even in the absense of metallic

type conductors

Most IP surveys

the time domain

are carried out by takingor the frequency domain

inmeasurements


J

l

J

D

D

D

o

7

CURRENT

TIME

r ITransmitted Waveform

VOLTAGE

VOLTAGE DECAY

TIME

Recorded Voltage

DTime domain measurements involve sampling the waveform at

intervals after the current is switched off to derive a

dimensionless parameter the chargeabili ty M which is a

measure of the strength of the induced polarization effect

Measurements in the frequency domain are based on the fact

that the resistance produced at the electrolyte charged particleinterface decreases with increasing frequency The difference

between apparent resistivity readings at a high and low

frequency is expressed as the percentage frequency effect

PFE

D

U

J

J

J

J

The two

portional

IP

at

response

fairlyparameters M and PFE are

low polarization values In

nearly pro

the absence


1

l

1

8

D

of large membrane

may indicate the

ization

polarization

presence of

effects high M or PFE values

disseminated sulphide mineral

n

In the process of carrying out an IP survey two other sets

of readings are taken these are resistivity and self potentialliSP The resistivity is a measure of how well the groundconducts electricity and depends mainly on saturation and

the ionic and clay particle content of the pore waters

o

DThe self potential effect is believed to be caused by the

vertical gradient in Eh oxidation potential usually presentin the ground Any strong conductor e g metallic sulphidesor graphite especially if it intersects the water table

will provide a medium for electron transfer from deeper layersto the surface The current circuit is completed by ionic

conduction through pore water surrounding the conductor The

surface manifestation of this phenomenon is a negative potentialabove the conductor this is generally of the order 100 700

mV although higher values have been reported The overall

ground potential pattern may be complicated by the topographiceffect increasing negative values going up hill the effect

of telluric currents and contact voltages between pots and

ground in different moisture conditions Nevertheless the

D

D

Q

J

D

U

D

presence of sizeable groundof massive deposits of such

chalcopyrite chalcocite

pyrolusite and psilomelane

potentialsmaterials as

is a oodo

indicator

pyrite pyrrhotiteanthracitecovellite graphite

Field Procedure and Reduction of Observations

0Ia Magnetics

Readings of the earth s total field were taken at 25 m intervals

fIL

U GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LID

J

1

n

o

D

o

D

o

D

D

D

D

D

D

J

J

9

along the 16 east west lines 100 m apart The diurnal variation

was monitored in the field by the closed loop method to enable

the variation to be removed from the raw data prior to plotting

A statistical analysis of the magnetic readings was carried

out by grouping the readings into 100 intervals then plottinga cumulative frequency graph The resulting distribution

was used to choose the threshold values for defining magnetichigh and magnetic low areas on the contour plan

b VLF EM

Dip angle readings were taken at 25 m intervals along the

survey lines

To permit easy contouring a numerical filter the Fraser

filter was then applied to the resul ts This is a 4 pointdifference operator that reduces the inherent high frequencynoise in the data and phase shifts the readings such that

a zero crossing becomes a peak i e a high positive value

Anomaly flanks become negative values when filtered and

these are therefore ignored when contouring

c Induced Polarization

The pole dipole electrical configuration was used for the

work In this array one of the current electrodes is deployeda long distance from the other three electrodes so that it

has a negligible effect on the voltage recorded at the potentialelectrodes For this survey the fixed current electrode was

located at the western end of each line

The two potential electrodes were kept 50 m apart and readings

taken at 50 m intervals along every second survey line with


0 p

1

1

1

J

J

o

J

L1

D

J

DD

J

J

J

J

10

the mobile current electrode 100 m from the potential dipole

i e n 2 When anomalous values were recorded usuallyM 3 further readings were taken at different levels

for n values of 1 3 4 and sometimes 5

Stainless

potentialsulphate

pots

were used for current electrodes The

compri sed metall ic copper in copper

in non polarizing unglazed porcelain

steel stakes

electrodes

solution

The chargeability values are read directly from the instrument

and no data processing is therefore required prior to plotting

The resistivity values are derived from current and voltage

readings taken in the field These values are combined wi th

the geometrical factor appropriate for the pole dipole array

to co pute the apparent resistivities The self potential

readings are obtained directly from the instrument The positiveterminal was connected to the eastern potential pot so a

positive reading represents an increase in potential from

west to east

The geophysical data has been presented in two forms The

chargeability and resistivity results for n 2 are shown

in plan form on Sheets 3 and 4 with the values being plotted

half way between the mobile current electrode and the nearer

potential pot The self potential gradient is plotted at the

mid point of the two potential electrodes Sheet 6 An alter

native presentation of multi level IP and resistivity results

is the pseudo section where the figures are plotted at the

intersection of lines drawn from a horizontal datum at 450

from the current electrode and the nearer potential electrode

The IP values are plotted belol the line and the resistivity

values as a mirror image above the line Sheet 5


J

J

D

o

B

o

o

o

u

o

J

D

D

J

U

J

J

11

Results

a Magnetic Survey

The statistical analysisnormal distribution but

The parameters of the

follows

of the results showed an approximatewith some skew towards high values

cumulative frequency graph were as

Anomalous low threshold

Sub anomalous low threshold

Mean

Sub anomalous high threshold

Anomalous high threshold

56 700 6

57 0836

57 4856

57 885

58 280 ll

These values were used as the basis for contouring the readingsto show magnetic high areas above 57 900 6 and magneticlow areas below 57 1006 The contour interval used was

200 approximately one half standard deviation

The most notable feature of the magnetic contour plan is the

area of intense activity in the south west corner of the

property with north south trending high and low anomalies

From the geological mapping of Kallock and Goldsmith the

underlying rock type in this area is augite andesite Elsewhere

on the claim there are scattered magnetic highs and magneticlows The most extensive anomaly is a magnetic low runningnorthwest from the northern end of Thumb Lake This may

represent a structual fracture such as a fault

b VLF EM Surveys

The Fraser filtered dip angles have

cal of 40 for positive values

anomalies In the eastern half of

sub parallel features marked on

been contoured at an inter

There are three prominentthe property there are two

Sheet 2 as a and B


J

l

J

1

o

o

o

o

1

o

J

LJ

D

U

D

J

J

J

12

trending approximately north south Anomaly b may be partlycaused by topography as it coincides wi th a morainal ridgeThis anomaly is not continuous through line S OON where there

is a prospect pit however it may reappear on lines 2 00

3 00 and 4 00N To the west of Thumb Lake there is a fairlyintense bifurcating anomaly C Elsewhere on the claim

there are some low amplitude anomalies that confirm the generalnorth south trend of the underlying structure

c Induced Polarization

The chargeability for n 2 plan Sheet 3 shows that the

highest values occur in the eastern half of the propertywith M values up to 6 4 against a background of about 2 0

The main anomaly d is centered on line S OON just east

of the prospect pit There is an elongated NNW SSE trendinganomaly e running approximately along line 1 00W and

cutting lines 7 00N through 13 00N The pseudo sections

Sheet 5 reveal that both these anomalies show up on all

the levels There is generally poor correspondence between

IP highs and resistivity lows in fact anomaly d coincides

with a resistivity high

The plan of apparent resistivity for n 2 Sheet 4 also

shows how the lowest resistivity areas tend to be in the west

of the property away from the higher IP readings The

variations in resistivity are likely to reflect small changesin moisture content and little can be concluded about the

significance of individual anomalies without a comparisonwith the other geophysical and geochemical results

The

due

SP gradient profiles Sheet 6 are

to variable grounding conditions

very noisy presumablyfor the pots SP is


J

n

o

D

D

o

D

o

D

D

o

o

UJ

13

unlikely to respond strongly to the disseminated or vein typemineralization that is the more likely target on this property

it is more suitable for detecting massive ore bodies There

fore any anomalies e g on lines 7 00N and 9 00N just north

of Thumb Lake are unlikely to be significant but should

nevertheless be considered in the context of the other survey

results

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

Survey Procedure

The soil samples were taken at 2S meter intervals along the

geophysical survey lines The samples were picked up with

a D handled shovel at about a 1S centimeter depth The horizon

sampled was B except where it could not be obtained then

horizon C was sampled Samples were placed in brown wet strengthpaper bags marked with grid coordinates

Laboratory Testing Procedure

All samples were tested by Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd

of Burnaby B C The sample is first thoroughly dried and

then sifted through a 80 mesh screen A measured amount of

the sifted material is then put into a test tube with sub

sequent measured additions of aqua regia This mixture is

next heated for a certain length of time The parts per million

ppm copper silver lead and zinc is then measured by atomic

absorption

Treatment of Data

A statistical analysis of the copper lead and zinc values

was used to find the background sub anomalous and anomalous

levels of each distribution If the readings approximate a


n

J

o

n

E1

oJ

n

D

J

DI

J

J1

U

o

u

u

u

u

14

normal distribution the background is taken to be the 507

level the sub anomalous threshold value is the 16 level

one standard deviation and the anomalous threshold is the

2 1 2 level two standard deviations The sub anomalous

threshold is a term used to denote the minimum value that

although not considered anomalous may still be importantas an indicator of mineralization

Most of the silver values were 0 1 ppm with only a few higherreadings A statistical analysis was therefore not possibleand the sub anomalous and anomalous values were determined

by eyeballing

Results

Copper

The statistical analysis of the copper values showed an

approximate normal distribution but with some skew towards

higher values The background mean level was found to be

18 ppm the sub anomalous threshold 25 ppm and the anomalous

threshold 33 ppm The results were contoured for values above

25 ppm using a logarithmic contour interval see Sheet 7

anomalies are small usually quite intense and tend to

around the perimeter of Thumb Lake and in the north

east corner of the property

The

fall

Lead

The lead

level of

values were normally distributed with a background10 ppm a sub anomalous threshold of 13 ppm and an

threshold of 15 ppm Anomalies were generally only

reading the maximum value recorded was 21 ppm

anomalous

a single


J

l

D

D

D

o

D

D

J

D

o

D

D

o11U

D

JJ

15

Zinc

The zinc levels showed a normal distribution up to the anomalous

level then a skew towards higher values The parameters taken

from the cumulative frequency curve were background 40 ppm

sub anomalous level 53 ppm anomalous level 65 ppm The

anomalies were sparse mainly being concentrated in the north

west of the claim

Silver

The majority of the silver values were 0 1 ppm with highervalues only up to 0 5 ppm The sub anomalous and anomalous

threshold levels were taken to be 0 25 and 0 35 ppm Onlya few localized anomalies were revealed

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The following table summarizes the cross correlation between

the various survey results

Approximately Location Coincident Anomalies

14 0011 15 00N Ag anomaly x ZI anomaly u

Cu anomaly f

0 5001 15 00N Pb anomaly p Cu anomaly h

2 0001 13 00N Ag anomaly z Pb anomaly qCu anomaly i

14 00W 8 00N Pb anomaly r Cu anomaly jalong same N S strike as Zn

anomaly v

11 00W 8 00N Zn anomaly w Cu anomaly k

in magnetic low area

3 00W 5 00N Pb anomaly s with minor eu

anomalies in IP high and on

strike with VLF EM lineation


J

1 16

o

o

D

D

o

It will be seen that the cross correlation between geophysicsand geochemistry is not strong There are only a few small

copper anomalies in the magnetically active area to the west

of Thumb Lake the VLF EM lineations do not seem to correspondwith geochemical trends and the IP highs do not contain any

particularly strong geochemical anomalies The geochemicalanomalies are generally weak and scattered with no strongcorrelation between themselves

Respectfully submittedGEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD

D

D

J

D

oJ

December 18 1981

u

J

J GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LID

J

117

o

on

o

J

D

o

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Kallock P and Goldsmith L B

of the Late 1 Mineral

Services 1981

GeologicalClaim Arctex

Investigation

Engineering

Kelly S F Report to the Inter Continental Energy Corpof Vancouver B C Concerning the Late Claim Groupat Thumb Lake near Merritt Nicola Mining Division

B C Consultants Report 1980

o Preto V A Geology of the Nicola Group Between Merritt and

Princeton B C Ministry of Energy Mines and Petro

leum Resources Bulletin 69 1979J

J

D

Rice H M A Geology of the Princeton Map Area B C Canada

Dept of Mines and Resources Memoir 243 Map 888A

1947

D

J

Jl

uJ GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD

Jl

18

n GEOPHYSICIST S CERTIFICATE

nI J M ANDERSON of the City of Vancouver in the

Province of British Columbia do hereby certify

J That I am a Consulting Geophysicist of Geotronics

Surveys Ltd with offices at 403 750 West Pender Street

Vancouver British ColumbiaJ

1

D

J

I further certify

1 That I am a graduate of the University of Tasmania1971 and hold a B Sc degree in Geophysics

That I have been practising my profession for the

past ten years

This report is compiled from data obtained fromVLF EM magnetic induced polarization and soil

geochemistry surveys carried out under tl1e directionof David G Mark Geophysicist and the field supervision of J Ashenhurst H Richardson and P Arbezfrom May 12th to October 20th 1981

2

3

l

J

U

J

J

J

J

J

4 I have no direct or indirect interest in the Late

Claim nor in Inter Continental Energy Corporationnor do I expect to receive any interest as a resultof writing this report

December 18 1981

M Anderson

eophysicist


l

nnLJ

JJ

oJ

o

o

J

Jo

D

o

u

19

AFFIDAVIT OF EXPENSES

This

and

is to certify that magnetic VLF EM soil geochemistryinduced polarization surveys as well as line cuttingcarried out within the period of July 11th to October

1981 on the Late Claim at Thumb Lake within the Nicola

Division B C to the value of the following

were

20th

Mining

FIELD a magnetic VLF EM soil

Geophysical technician helperRoom and boardTruck rental gasInstrument rental

Survey supplies

geochemistry surveys 27 days6 3243 4072 720

300200

12 951

FIELD b line cutting I P survey 21 days5 man I P crew and instrument

Room and boardTruck rental and gasChainsaw rentals

12 3503 1002 400

200

18 050LAB

Soil geochemistry analysis for 4 elements

OFFICE

GeophysicistGeophysical technician

Drafting and printingTyping photocopying and compilation

2 828

1 8901 4803 051

200

6 621

GRAND TOTAL 40 050

Respectfully submittedGEOTR IC SURVEYS LTD

Da id

Geophyger

May 25 1982


Il

l

l

l

I1

J

JJ

J

JJ

J

J

o

PROPERTYLOCATION

Queen

0

UN IT E 0S o TE5

GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTO

INTER CONTINENTAL ENERGY CORP

LATE CLAIMNICOLA M 0 8RITISH COLUM81A

GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL SURVE

LOCATION MAP

ALTAIRdnotflng SQlVlces ltd

SCALE DATE1 50 000 DEc al

JOB No

8115

FIGURE No

r

IP

n

1

n

R

H

I

I1

U

I

u

U

J

J

i J

U

UI

U

120030

jcree

j

Jt

fS

49050 Jrv

I

I

on

S

fuII

Fo

rJv

Jeeekdv

12003

LATE

CLAIM

iG

9050

ffI

L L



LATE CLAIMNICOLA M 0 BRITISH COLUMBIA

GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

CLA M MAP

SCALE DATE

1 50 000 DEe Sf

JOB No

8 5

FIGURE No

2

liIL1I

2t o 22 I 2 I 1 I 29l I

LlL

I

oo

LO

224 Km fo Kentucky Lakes

283KmtoHwy5626 Km fo Merritt

If15 If

I

I

I

II

IIIII

I 17 I

If If7

t1 II

I 2

17 15 I

I 20

16

11 19

7 17r

r nl n III n nmn IlII1Ln rl IEl iI IHRllllllllldlll I i iillliiilll

oo

It

oo

oo

CI

oo

oo

o

oo

en

oo

CD

oo

oo

Ul

oo

LO

oo

It

oo

oo

CI

oo

oo

o

J

CD

18 17 3 IfI

Ic

III

I

I

J1

n D

1If

IJI1 7 1 III

1

1

hI

I I

If I

L 14 00 N

L 15 00 N

1

If c 5 I

j r

I I21 2 I

1

II 8

IIII

I

5 2

L II OON

f5

rf lJI

I

t

II

1

J

PIe

IIIIIII

1II

1 1 2

III

I

e I 0

II

d I II

II

JIII L 12 00 N

It 121

If II

II

I

19 lof 10I12IJf21ZZ z 4

I

f

I 117 1

f

I 12I I

I 1 2 II

II 13

A

I 17

I 20 IfI C2t

II

I 19 2 6

II

I

I

9

I

I

I

If 20 I

I

J11j

III

IIIIIIII

I

1

II

jIII

IS I s If

1 I 1

I

II

I 1 o

III

L 13 00 N

IfIII

III

I

8 23 1

It of I2I 17 76 1 1 r

II

17Z3 f 17 20I2 IfI

I

I

IIi

i16 I r I

zo 6

f2

14 2 333De

y JJz

f

21f I 170If 137 1 12

e4 rz If 101 01 17 17 17 4t 19 ZI4I

Ii

II

21 LsI I

Ii

S

II

I

L 10 OON

II

I

I

It

II

II

I

t

17 7 1 81 3

I JI II II I

1 I

1 37 loi

I 1I j

I

1

iIt

fI t 2i

It 12It 1

1 IJ II1 I

III

I11I 2I 12

1217I 8loPIt IfI 17I

t7

17t

2 127I

I

3 II

IjI

1 2

I21 I

16151 I 12 I q t II

I

I

I

II

6 11 II 15

I

I

I

I I

1722

8I812II

III

17

ltII Ilf III

I

If Z IO

1 e5 zZ Ij

I I

1I

I I

0It to

1IIII

I

J

I

4 21

II

III

III

III

I3

L 9 00 NIi

4

I

I 10 7 t I

6 6 Ze1 0 7 21lf eO6 5 If f lfI t 1 II 354 12 s ItII

I

I

I1 II

2S 7 is zl 8

1

U zf 3 2 oN 20 21I I II

I

II

k0

I

I

f7

1I

J

I

III

I

IIII

I

16 712 II 2

I

II

I

I

7 21 I

I I I1I 1

I

I I

I 13 tp 11 17

III

II

1I

f

of1 17 t5 M13I I

L 8 00 N2

I

d

iI

II

17 3

I

j

L 7 OON

1

211121

f o o

NI 3zt 159 Zf0

r

21 2 91 2i 3ED 17 1

I2t 27 717 r

I

717 S 3 II 8 12I

I1I

II

iI

1I

I

I

II

II

II

II

71 I

I

I

I

42

2

2 IIr

I

IJ

2t JJ J5 If 2 2

I2 I

30 31 tf

lI 1

II

1II 1I

I f21 311 9 I T B

I

I

IIj

I2 1

r

1

V1f Jb

0 f 1 3

ZQ t7

kI

II

V

IJ11 21 If

1 11 If 21

I

1

I

II

II I

L 6 00 NII

L J

t

f

20

i 31 21

II

I ILf 8 if

r

I

I II o

I

II i

1IIIII I

II

I I II

51 23

ISZof 2

II

2

LCP

23

Ii

I

I

I

L 5 00 N

9 9

II

II

2s 1

II

1II

r

I

I1 II

25

I I

II

20 7

3

I12720

If 22 23 2

I

j

THUMBL 4 00N

I1

I

II

IzSIJ B 7

I

27

IL 3 00 N

4

5oLAKE 11 eo

YI71

11 8

II

g J o I It 11 7 ii 1 oI

I

II

III

I1 5 e rz 9

21 l

L 2 OON

I231 r

CJ

JOII

L

I

l1 l i

1

II

o ltI

I

1

I

IIIII

1I

1

201 I231 30

L I 00 N

27 2 II

Z Z8 9 132

S 269 130I

r

r1

21 I 33 Izo

5 1

9 7

L 0 00

SYMBOLS NOTES LEGEND SURVEY PARAMETERS

x Small outcrop I All odd numbered lines are blazed

and brushed out

52 Mean batkground value 18

Sub anomalous threshold value 25

Anomalous threshold value 33200

I

Copper values in pp m

Sub anomalous tontour

Anomalous tontours at values of

33 40 50 60 70 85 100 120

150 180 and 220 p p m

50 25 o 25Outcrop area 50 75 100

UOJ Assumed foult2 Location of the N S blazed lines as

shown have been partially interpolated All

are yellow flagged and are the original

reconnaissance geachern survey lines

Metres

To Accompany Geochemical Geophysical Report By J M AndersonJ Geophysicist0 Pit trench

Secondary rood GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD


LATE CLAIMNICOLA MINING DISTRICT BRITISH COLUMBIA

GEOPHYSICAL a GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

COPPER VALUES

Trail

I nterpreted Anomalies see textShoreline

MINIItAL RlsouaCIS BRANCHASSISSMfNTRIIIORT

oIt

Swamp drainage boundary

rJlQtI48

Swamp

Stream intermittent stream

o Claim post

Cut old picket line

Blazed line

SURVEY 8Y DRAWN BY DATE JOB No

H R C B Dec 1981 81 15

N T S SCALE SHEET No

92 H 16W 1 2 500 7

I

JI

ImV

20

oo

10

224 Km to Kentucky Lokes

283KmfoHwy5 mV626 Km to MerTltt

10

10

20

I

mV

20

0

II

II

IIIIIIIII

10

20

mV

20

ID

10

20

mV

20

I

oo

V

oo

IC

oo

N

oo

en

oo

J

oo

10

oo

I

oo

D

oo

V

oo

rQ

oo

o

oo

oo

L 15 00 N

I

I

I

J I 1774h4

30 5 3 13

II

91

I378 47

Z3 Z17735 3 4

I1

111 8b

2 4 1Z 8

II

I

2

18 rn q

1

1j

I

II

I

LI4 00N

III

E3 1

IIIIri

ji

I

o

IVIj

II

I

Ie5 o

IIij

L 13 00 N

30 5 244 122 2 0 72Z 22 0 25 028 1 Z3

II

1 L12 00 N

qZ3423 02834 828 7Z8 1 nD

III

I

I

25

II

II

I

1

I

II

II

III

II

I1

II

I

l 33

L11 00 N

IS

III

3 215 3So 10 4 28 1 122 12

I 10

I 10

II

I

I 25 0

IIS3

2 8 340 3 13 4

III

II

10 85

LIO OON20 I

I1

III

J12 2 5S 21 1

I

I

IIS 3 2 67 6

I

It

II

io

L 9 00 NI15 3

JJ

3 8 41S

20i 6 31 2 23

I

I

III

II I

L S OONI

Ill

I

Iz4 3 3 32 3

1 0

10 4

I mV

20

I

IX

II

20

lI j V

20

j

10

20

II

III

I

rvOJ

0

J

2 44 44 3 37I 8 S 12 2 41 S853 65

l

1I

I

II

rF

L 5 00 N

II

III

II

JI

II

I1 10

J

L 6 00NyLf

10

1 2

fj I

fY

9 33

f14 02 412 8 Z3 8 J2 2

10 I

11I

I

I

f L 4 OON

L I OON

THUMB

1S 3 iff 4 f

h

0 33 6 34 2

oLAKE

Z22 83 10 4

10

20

t

A

I

oI Jr

I iIt

I

L 0 00

5

1

I

3 1 8 S

mV

20

r

toJ

L 2 00 N

20 8 8 0 71

0L

7f159 20 8IO f 2Z o

lL

O

20 II 1

IiII I

1r

LCP

SYMBOLS NOTES LEGEND


and brushed out4 0

200

Self potential gradient in mY Pointsrepresent rise ve or foil ve in voltagefrom western electrode to eastern electrode 50 25 0 25 50 75 100

Outcrop area

Assumed fault2 Location of the N S blazed lines as


are yellow flogged and are the original

Metres

To Accompany Geochemical Geophysica I Report By J M Anderson Geophysicist

Pit trench

Secondary road reconnaissance geochem survey lines GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTD

Trait INTER CONTINENTAL ENERGY CORP


Shoreline

MINERAL RESOURCES 8RANCHASSESSMfNT REltOKT


Swamp


INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY

SELF POTENTIAL PROFILES


g 8Blazed line

o Claim post

Cut old picket line

SURVEY 8Y DRAWN 8Y DATE JOB No

81 15

N T S

92 H 16W

SCALE

1 2 500

SHEET No

6J RA Dec 1981J R A

If fZ

III

II

ft f 10

III

1

JI

II

0 ID II

1

IQ IQ

oo

I

224 Km to Kentucky Lakes

283 Km to Hwy 5

626 Km to Merritt

f tflII

III

II

9

8 q r f 10

fZ fO f 10

IIIIIIII

I

N

fO ffO 0

fl

q fl7

q

III

If I4

III

If

q fl

1

lI

2 Z Z 2

IC

q 10

A

II

If 9

i II

113 if

II

tI

4

II

rv

0

I

oo

V

oo

rt

oo

N

oo

oo

en

oo

CD

oo

r

oo

I

oo

V

oo

ID

oo

o

fZ l

r

7f rI

9 8 0

It11

IVI lj

I

1II f

vII

VI

f 10

II

i

B e 1 f 0

Ij

L B e7

7 7

r 0 0 r

0

1 1 7

JB ff

0

fl

It It f 6 B 2 13 if

r tJ if Itl f II 10

rfr I

I

7 fO

II

I

I0

IIII 8

I I

f

1

37 fO ft

I

9 7B8 f

III

Iff 61 0 fz1 If

II 11

III

8 17

I

II

III

10 1 IP 8 7 I

J Jr8 1 I

I Ir1

11

f I

10 j

fI I II

III I1 II I

I 10

I II II I

j

10 A IIIi9 II1R A 9

I11

II1

I

8

I11 7 7

II

JIf

iI

110 IIIII10f 0

I17

I

IIf

I1I

I

II 1069 l111II7

III

II

I II

0 1

V IIj

f II 1

I If I

f 0 19 0 0 1I

1 I

JI

i

I1 Ii 1 7 7 J t II 2 1 1 1 10

I

I Il 9 II II 1

II

I

1I

ITI I i

I 0 3 of z z 0 3 2I

0

I LCP

6 l 8 II

I

1 It 2 ft 7 7

L

II 2 lII I

I llL I

0 12 IZ 4 CT 12 1 4 tz t

i

1 j

1j1 l J

re e 8 8 9

1C o 2 r

I II I i

llL

I 9 II 0 IZ t 2 II pI 3 It 0 ilt

llL

I I if

I

f

I

II

IIII

I

IIII

I

f 10

1

IZ

III

fJI

rif17TtJ7

II

II

II

9

76II7

III

f 7 I

II f iI

B fJlI 11

rIII

5 111I

Ir I

IIII

f y Z

10 6 t1D 7

II

II

II

0 I

I

ItI If 1 0

IIII IffI II IIq

J1i

l

i Aft

II II If I

2

6 q

IZ1 IZ 9 10

q0 9f1

I1

1q 7 It10 q 10 0 I

II

II

rI

II

7

JIII

II

I

II 1I II I1 4 3

I

I I

II

III

I

JIIII

Ih

V tj I8 q q II 2

iP I 1 i II 1

II

II

JI

I1

01

IZ2 II 0 z

II

3

II

fIQ

I IIII

If

1

v Jf7 tett 1 1 9 2 r

fI

11I

9 I I II0

jTHUMB

oLAKE

1

r

OJ

IIJ

1

1 2 2 f3 0 I

1 0 t

I I1

IIII

III I

III

1I

11 13 3 of 1 2

II

r

I1 V 10

I

1A1l 12 I0 I 12 2 z 2 2 t t 2

SYMBOLS LEGEND SURVEY PARAMETERSNOTES

x Small outcrop I All odd numbered lines Ofe blazed 12 Lead values in p p m

Sub anomalous contour

Anomalous contours at values

of 15 17 and 20 pp m

P Interpreted anomalies see text

Mean background value

Sub anomalous threshold value

Anomalous threshold value

10ppm13 pp m

15 pp mOutcrop area

and brushed out

Assumed fault2 Location of the N S blazed lines os


are yellow flagged and ore the original

Shoreline

Pit trench

Secondary road reconnaissance Qeochem survey lines

Trail

Swamp drainage boundaryMlNEIW RISOURa5 IRANCH

ASSESSMENT REJIORTI Swamp

IqfttBStream intermittent stream

o Claim post

Cut old picket line

Blazed line

I1

III

II

IIJ 0

I JfII

7 If IJ

fq 7

II

oo

rt

oo

N

t11 z

0

II

I

I1

III

9

fI

liP II 10

f7 6 9 0

B

P 8 tJ It pIt

9 II 7

q I II

1 0v 0

s

rI

I

I I

r1f

IS

I

1I I

tI

Jl

IIt

0

y 3I

I

2 IZ

II

I

III

I 1

II

1I rI 6

7 9

I

SfIII

2

i

L

oo

oo

o

J

m

L 15 00 N

I

IIiII

1 t

I0

I

I

197tt I

I

PI

I

I

L 14 00 N

L13 00 N

0 0 3

II

I I

z1 112

I

L12 OON3 1

1 III

III

I I

LII OON

q D

LIO OON

L 9 00 N

9

L a OON

II iP J 1

L 7 00N

12 B 9 1

L 6 00N

0 1 2 1 2

L 5 00 N

9

L 4 OON

15 2

l

L 3 00 N

r

L 2 OON

9

L I OON

L 0 00

50 25 0 25 50 75 100 200

To Accompany Geochemical I Geophysical Report 8y J M Anderson Geophysicist

Metres





SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

LEAD VALUES

SURVEY BY DRAWN BY DATE JOB No

H R C B Oec 19BI BI 15


92 H 16W 1 2 500 a

oo

10

oo

v

oo

rt

oo

N

oo

oo

o

oo

en

oo

CD

oo

I

oo

D

oo

10

oo

v

oo

rt

oo

N

oo

oo

o

J

m

l

zf 31

I

v 313 27

III

I15 31A ftJ 5 1

III I

I f2f vM

110 z n

l

i1 r I

Jf1 2t 2

1I I

i II 1

II

J

15 21 So

II

I

L 15 00 N

J

l5

I7 7

I I1 I

1I 11

I I

II I

5 5 Its 0I ID

11

r019 1s si 55 0 4 J

1 11 v

IiiI

i I rI I I

3 37 4tJ H 49 8 I 59 0 I 5iJ I

II 1 I

II

I

II I

33 43 2 2

II

r I1

J

I

11

11 11 4Z I

1

t 5 f1 IZ 3 8

IZ 3I 52 ef

1I

III I9 18 I Ip9 J If

7

II

I9 11 o J5 Zf

ijj

3 IZ z 7 0

j

240 9 2 2 30 3o ls c

n 2 o e 32 6

II

I27

III

34 33

I

f

32 f 6 7

fsa 1 3Z J

11II

II

L 14 00 N

224 Km to Kentuck Lakes

283 Km to Hwy 5

626 Km to MerrItt

fo J tl 110 30

JO 37 3 26

II

II

I

1 5 24 28 21 11 3f50 I 7 2 15

ZD 31 3

1 If

LI3 00N

21 S J8 5f

S9

II

II

11

II

II

2 21 2 23 25 16

II

IZ 27 Z f 5

III

Jz 2 2 3aL1I 25

L41 ft 5

II

ff

2 57 g 5Y 20 3 42

II

z34 34 5Ii

40 33 7I

94

II

1

51 J

1

I

r

1571

z 2

I152

f

I

4tJI III h

1 1

L12 00 N

I

I

i

f3 17

II IIIIIII

IIl

f vIIIIIII II

J I

I51 52

AtIJ

f

3J 2Z 42 Js 7 21 e e6

3 53

I

17 42 28 Jz

rIIII 17

I III

E 7 2ft 2 31 11 ge 30 0 33 1 Iz 535 27 JB orYb 0

L11 OONJI

4 17 8

11

11

I IIifJf 7

13 3 g9 3

l

3 38 t8 Oftzf 21 2615

2Z 2 r23 fr6 2 31 43 37 2

2 27 51 Z9 LIO OON

3 5 59

51 1I I

I1 1

II

II35 1 31

I

I

II

i IIII

It

7 48 Iz oro

okII

n 51 8 v 36 FI I1

I1

ic 4 57 II

I

56 z J8 J

104Z 38

9 3 2 9 3 1

II

II

II

rII

J II I

r4 inI I

J II

II I

I I

I

37 53

If

I

I

I

3t

1

41 s5 I ora 5

11

11II

1

1

I1

50 4 s5 s9

u p ui I

I II II I

I II I

II

30 5

I2

II

2 25 Z 8 II r6 50 31 P go r

L 9 00 N

45 of0 I

II

SSI 50

3Z 21

r

I

II I57 53

I

II

1

f I

ijI

33 3 v

II

L S OON

36 3 h 39 42 4 J5 8 III Z 20 f Z7 all

II

L 7 OON

1

47 17

51 7 47 SZ 3 SO

L 6 00N

Sr 49 50 47 4 40 40 17 41

II

4Z 3 10 3 Z 0 Z6

4 SI

t3

H I l 37r lI II II

I1IIII

1 I

I I

1 I1 I

1

47 Jr4 r

IIII

1

II

I 1

II

4 sd 47 5I

1

1

I III

I II I

I II I

r

IS9 lz St

1

L 5 OON

10 Jc 24 39 5P 41 4 33 41 3 39 24

L4 00NTHUMB

oLAKE

54j x

L 3 00 N

9 6 8

r1

f J a

flj

1I

z 2 39 7

III

H 5 Jf 47 41

I

II

27 21 4

L 2 00Nlie

d2L 10

ft fI

1t

41 3 33 f J J jB 7

4 3241 r

0

IJ

51I I

a Z

1t

I

L I 00 N

Jb

x LCPL 0 00

SYMBOLS NOTES LEGEND SURVEY PARAMETERS


and brushed out

44 Zinc values in p p m

Sub anomalous contour

Anomolous contours at values

of 65 80 and 100 pp m

Mean background value



40 pp m

53 pp m

65 pp m

w e 0 e w WO 200Outcrop area

rvA Assumed fault2 Location of the N S blazed lines as


are yellow flogged and are the original

reconnaissance geochem survey lines

Metres

To Accompany Geochemical Geophysica I Report By J M Anderson Geophysicist0 Pit J trench

CUI old pickel line





SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

ZINC VALUES

Secondary road

ITrail

w Interpreted Anomalies see text

MINERAL RESOURCES lRANCH

MSWMEHT REPORTShoreline

It


Ig448Swamp


D Claim post

Blazed line

a SURVEY 8Y ORAWN 8Y OATE JOB No

H R C B Oec 19BI B 1 15


92 H 16W 1 2 500 9

Z j J jllrv

I1

III

I

11 1

II

oo

10

22 4 Km to Kentucky Lakes

28 3 Km to Hwy 5

62 6 Km fa Merritt

III

IIIIIIIII

1 II

III

IJI

I

I

X

II

Z Z t

I f

t t

to 1

J

I J

I

II

Z

i jI1

I

III

1

III

I

JI

x

rvrv

0

1

D

I I2 j I

JI

o

III

I

IIJ

II

oo

V

oo

N

oo

If

2 z J2 f r

i

zr

J 1

tr I I Z

1

I1 1

II

1

I

f I

1

I1 1

I XY I

J 1 2 I e I

II1 i l l

I IIj 1

I II

III

II

IIIII

l I r f

IIIII

f f

f

f

II

iI

IIr

oo

oo

CD

oo

oo

o

J

m

3oo

I

3oo

en

oo

Ul

oo

10

oo

o

oo

V

3oo

If

oo

N

y 1 x I

j I 2 j

L 15 00 N

jf I r I r

Z 2

II

I

I

I

It IIj2 j1 2

III

I

2 I

f

IrI

II

I

2 J ft

Z I

L 14 00 NI

IJ 2

I

2 r 2 2

I IIr I

I

1 z JI

r 2 I

II II I

I

II I

II

2 2 1 JI

I I fI I

III

IjII I 1

1

ILI

IL 13 00 N

z

IVI

2L12 00N

I

I f I j

1I

I1 3 1 2

II

I I IZ I I2 I II I

II

I

B I IIIj

I

II

II

i rI

r f II 11 2 I II j I I

If f

1 I

I r 2

IIII I

IJI I Vi I I I J 1

f f f

If

It I I

II II I 1 L A

f f I 1 1 1 J J

III

I Ir

If J J I f t I t

11 r I

10II c I

r

I I 0f 1I

I I

1 I 0

II I I

f 1 I

JI I J I

tli1 J

I I 0

I 0I

1 IY

1 I

i xJ J I 1 I 2

fI

II J 1

2 t I II 2 IZ

IJ

1 f

III

Ii

y

LII OON

I1

III

I

II I

i 1

V z2 I

If

rI

I

fIIII

IJI

1

LIO OON

2

I

t I

2 11 f

L 9 00 NIf

JI

IIff f

f

III

J

II1

i1I v

f Ic

2

I

1

z

0z

cl

1 f r 2

f 1 rl

1 LJ

I 5 ij r

ok

It f f f I 1

Z 1 1

I II J Ii t I

l 1 1 1 11 1

711 1

If 1

I 1 I

I L n

I I

I 1 1 I I I I f l f f tL

1 1

II

II

I I J I fJ

IIIi

I

ff I l

t t ff

II

f t I ff

1

L

1 1 It

SYMBOLS

Small outcrop

Outcrop oree

Assumed fault

PitI trench

J J IfII II fz L 8 00 N

f I

II

L 7 OON

I I JI 2 I II I

I r

2r

L 6 00 N

I I Iy

tZI

I I

2tJf I

jI

f

I

J JZ

I 2

II Io

I z

I

I

fI

L 5 00 N

I 1

I

II

J I I II

iI I 1I

jl

II

I

II

t cl t 12 7 I

I

II

2 f f

i

L 4 00NTHUMB

2 J 2 IoI

I

I

LAKEI z

x

L 3 00 N

1

IZ Z e

L 2 OONI

I1 J L I

1 r

J

f ZJ

I

1i

LCP

I fL I OON

II

22 f I I I f I I

II1

L 0 00

NOTES LEGEND SURVEY PARAMETERS

I All odd numbered lines are blazed 2 Silver values in p p m

Sub anomalous contour50 75 100

Background level



I p p m

25 pp m

35 pp m

and brushed out 50 25 o 25 200

2 Location of the N S blazed lines as


Metres

To Accompany Geochemical Geophysical Report By J M Anderson Geophysicist

Y Interpreted Anomalies see text

Secondary road

are yellow flagged and are the original

reconnaissance geochem survey lines GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTO

Trail

Shoreline


Swamp


Claim post

CUI old pickel line

Blazed line

M N RESOURCES BRANCH

ASSESSMENT REPORT INTER CONTINENTAL ENERGY CORP

LATE CLAIMNICOLA MINING DISTRICT BRITISH COLUMBIAlq

GEOPHYSICAL 8 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY

SILVER VALUES

SURVEY 8Y DRAWN 8Y DATE J08 No

H R C B Dec 19BI 81 15


92 H 16W 2 500 10

711

3oo

to

7fl96

717

3oo

V

x

rvrv

0

J

I

k

o

SYMBOLS

Small outcrop

Outcrop area

Assumed fault

Pit trench

Secondary road

Trail

Shoreline

3oo

rt

Swamp



Claim post

Blazed line

Cut old picket line

I

i

I

I

3oo

N

oo

7 13

NOTES

I All odd numbered lines ore blazed

and brushed out

2 Location of the N 5 blazed lines as


are yellow flooged and are the original


3oo

o

3oo

J

8214

II

3Ioo

CO

LEGEND

Value in gammas of earth s total

magnetic field less 50 000 t

Contours of values above 57900 tl

in 200 t intervals

Contours of values below 57 100 tl

in 200 tl intervals

3oo

t

3oo

lJ

3oo

to

3oo

V

f

MINERAL RESOURCES BRANCH

94l I

ctJ

II

01

oo

rhI

r

I

tiiI

3oo

N

oo

o

J

CD

3oo

AJ7 r Ibo7

73 86 oS

i

74pL 7S9

789 77

1110

l5

71 8t7711 3

J 7ZtJSN Vl 90

7775tii1 13577 l 70

L 15 00 N

LI4 00N

L 13 00 N

9

L 12 00 N

LII OON

LIO OON

L 9 00 N

L 8 00 N

i3L

7 75

778 Ji7 8 7 20

7S 71

rM 73 Z

50t

25I

o 25 50 75 100

5 00 N

L 4 OON

7zBl

L 3 00 N

L I 00 N

200

Metres

To Accompany Geochemical I Geophysical Report By J U And GJ

M arson eophyslCISt





MAGNETIC SURVEY

DATA a CONTOURS

SURVEY BY DRAWN BY DATE JOB No

H R C 8 00c I9BI B 1 15

N T S SCALE

92 H 16W 1 2 500

SHEET No

I

I

i

II

Ii

1

1

jJ

i

IiLI

1

oo

10

oo

v

oo

rt

oo

N

oo

oo

o

oo

m

oo

X

oo

f

oo

D

oo

10

oo

v

oo

rt

oo

N

oo

oo

o

J

m

tLI5 00N

THUMB

II

I 1 J 1

I

ll r

p Zd Z3 13 6

I h II

1I

Ji I X f8 1 7 8 3 17

i J IJ I I

1

1

J3 If I Iii s 6

t Z d I I u 6 7

1 111 J

1I

1r ll

r II 1

J Ii

i Z7 8 1r 3

I

8I 3 I II 7

lI

I

S I a ii I II

I

I

I 1r I i1 1

7 J b3a 3

itj if26 Y

T I

0 z

i ur I b I J 7i

I I V

10 4 7 I 6 I z 0 2 o 8 9 5 7 0 z3

rI

II

rI

IJ L I x 2

II 19 7 4f 5 0

leI 171

11

11

vI

i Ji C z 0 e X I

ill 03 41 3 6 e z

I f YI l jI r I l I i I I

f 1 II dI

x 1I 1

1 i I

71 V 2 5 3 2 Z Z 7 3 7 9 9 1 k

c

I

I IIlV I i

B 7 flu 0 6 l Z7 d 5 1 3 2 1

I A 1I Ij

I I I

ll1 I Il I8 I z t z

I

I

III I

j lI

J I1 j IiZ I

fI J

tI

v

II

IIf

L I6 6 6

II II

B IZ z

I x I7 o 8 jhi 5 9 2 It 9 I

0

1

lJ7 z3 Z 7 IS

iI 8 I I V1 B I I I I

I

W r 1 Ji I 1i I 1 0 2 3 2 4

3 3 1 I IS II S IZ

I I1

I z S0

IS0

7t IJ I 1 I 11 jj 3 8 7J S 7 7 Z j 7 5 8

0 q 1 lii 9 9 1 z 9 0 0 z ifl 1 of 0I

II r 11 II I

I I

j II I VII II

I 11

I I

I I I I I1

I I I I II I I I I I I

I I 1 I I11 I I 1 I I

I

1 II I

B 10 1 1 7e 1 S 2 3 7 b 3 eo

f 7 3 e 0 4 Ie I 0 J3 0l I

J I

I

j I

J 1 fI

I 1

I I II

I I I

J 1

1 II I

j1

I 1 11 II

I j I 0 7 If t

7t 7 r b II I I 1 i1 zr or

IiJ II I II II I I I

Ii I 1I I

1 1 I i 311

2 eo i2

3 5 2 I Z 1 9 8

i I I

Ii I 93

I I II I

2v i I I I I I I

3

vCJ

Ii I

I I I1 II I

II I I I

I I Y1 I I

II I

I I

I I I I I

I I

J

I I

I 0I

6 8 z z 0 Ii i 7 0 C7

3

l rz i

Irh 7

fi

II W I j 2I 1 I I

I 1 I

r I II

II I

18

I 8

I 8 0 g I 5 g 7 Z 7I J

z jA A I 0 I Z III 7 6 7

U L 1

I I 4

I I I1 11

I

1

j3 5 tJ z y j 2 Z Z 3 z ojL I h Ii S 3 0

I fl I I I 1 1I I

1c

4I

I I 1i 0

Ii Ir

1 IIlS 01 3j J3 1 b 3 z 7 3 Z 9 II

I II

7I

I V I t 1 8

I GI

lII I II

IJ

t 3 7 7 I Z Ii 7 8 i L 1 ii

jZz

1 111

0 Z 01 j ij

V r LIc tJ

I P I I X 17 q b9 I A1 Z 8 z I

I f j Ylj 0I

C 1I I

I

I1 I

I I 1 I1

j I I

l I J lL

IZ 0 S 4 t7 1 Zlzo 0 1 3 1 z 9 0 4

r f iI

II

1

I i

q

Jl iLll T1

I I9 q f4 0 1 2 s Sl 8 P iI 7J B Z 6 7

I

ji J J

I 1

Vt J

I V I tI I

I I2I 2 4 q q 7 3 0

Iz i1

II

I0 I

1

1I

I

I

IL I gl 3 3 4 1

I @L 0 r

1 5

I

12 7

I I1

I

s Z I z 3 E

fI

I s 6 IS

L 14 00 N


28 3 Km to Hwy 5626 Km to Merritt

I2 0

II

t1m

II

L 13 00 N

z

I I1

I

L12 00 N

10

L II 00 N

i

LIO OON

L 9 00 N

L 8 00 N

t

L 7 OON

L 6 00N

L 5 OON

7

4

J L4 00N

oLAKE

xL 3 00 N

III

I

I II

9 t7 B ii 4

I

I

4

L 2 00NII

13

I 1

0

9 II 0

I

fII

1I

I

1o 8

I

I 5 3 dr

I I I

J I II I

7I II I

II1I

612 7

ill I

oJ L I 00 N

9 3 6 2 8 t0 h

I j5 s z 2 2

L 0 00lCP

SYMBOLS NOTES LEGEND

x Small outcrop 1 All odd numbered lines are blazed 9 Dip angle in degrees of VLF EM field

2 Negative dip angleContour interval 40 for positive values

50 25 0 25 50 75 100 200IOutcrop area

and brushed out

Assumed fault2 Location of the N 5 blazed lines as

MINERAL R SOURCES BRANCH

ASSU NT REPORTMetres


0 Pit trench


are yellow flagged and ore the originalTransmitter station

Seattle Washington 18 6 kHz

Receiver

Sabre Electronics VLF EM receiver lQqtt GEOTRONICS SURVEYS LTDSecondary road reconnaissance geochem survey lines

k

Swamp drainage boundary b Interpreted anomalies see text VLF TRANSMITTER

SEATTLE



Trail

Shoreline

Swamp

arGEOPHYSICAL a GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

VLF EM SURVEY

IStream intermittent stream

D Claim post

Cut old picket line

Blazed lineFRASER FILTERED DIP ANGLE

SURVEY 8Y DRAWN BY DATE

RA C B Dec 1981

JOB No

81 5

N T S

92 H 16W

SCALE

1 2 500

SHEET No

2

oo

10

224 Km fa Kentucky Lakes28 3 K m to Hwy 5

626 Km to Merritt

1 2

I

2 0

oo

V

7

I

III

II

zYI

I

JI

Izo

II

17

II

III

Z 3

oo

rt

17

I

III

II

J

oo

N

Ig

Io

I1II

1

II

II

IJ 14

oo

oo

o

II

II

I

IIII

18

18 20 15

II

I

z t

J

J

09 2

J

IJ

I 3

V11

14

2 3 I j 13

I

II

III

J

1 LI L i

ld

lW

i

III

III

I

MINERAL RESOURCES BRANe

ASSESSIKNT REPORT

IqJQ48rvrv

0

r

I

j

II

I

z 22

IIIIII1

I

III

II

1 7

IIIt

II

II

u

IIl

7 8

i

Z7 2 2 f

a a

I II

IL

7 u J 8

IL

SYMBOLS

Small outcrop

Outcrop area

Assumed fault

Pit1trench

Secondary rood

Trail

Shoreline

Swamp I drainoo boundary

Swamp


o Claim post

Cut old pIcket line

Blazed line

II

II

II

III

I

c

2 Zl

9 1 9

I

II

II

J1 J

fJ

J

NOTES

2 Z 2 4

I11r

9 1 8

4 I

and brushed out

I All odd numbered lines are blazed

2 Location of the N 5 blazed JInes as

shown hove been partially interpolated All

ore yellow flolilQed and ore the original


17

3oo

0

2 08 I

t3 J

Il 11

cc

I

t

2 0 8

2

2 2 20

o

II

2

19

3

1

23

0 1lJ

f1 I

ff

oo

ex

oo

I

oo

to

7 2 1 7 2

J

f III

2 26 2

1

20 23

22

II

II

II

2

I

2

i

17

1 I

9 2

THUMB

n

INSTRUMENT ATION

Huntec M 4 Receiver

Phoenix IPT I Transmitter

Pole dipole array

Dipole length 50 m

Delay time 300 rns

In egration time 65 ms

LAKE

LEGEND2 Chargeability M

Cant our interval I for M 2

d Interpreted anomalies see text

oo

10

oo

V

1

2 122

II

II

II

I

II

IIj

I q I z

III

J

IIIII

J2

2I

U

III

II

20 1 8

23 22 I

I

rI

j

veo

I28

39 e7

jj

I b I

I

I

r

v

oo

rt

oo

N

oo

2I

If

ZI 30 2 2

I

3830 24 31 3

d

2 4

I

II

f

3 a l28

22 2 27

2 02

3

l

e27 e 23

22 2 0 2 3

I

21 8 Z3

Ie

j LCP

50 25 0 25 50 75 100

Metres

oo

o

J

al

L 15 00 N

L 14 00 N

L 13 00 N

L12 00 N

L II 00 N

LIO OON

L 9 00 N

L S OON

L 7 OON

ulL 6 00 N

L 5 00 N

L 4 00N

L 3 00 N

L 2 OON

L I 00 N

L 0 00

200







CHARGEABILlTY FOR N 2

SURVEY 8Y DRAWN 8Y DATE J08 No

J R A J R A 00c 1981 81 15

I

N TS SCALE SHEET No

92 H 16W 1 2 500 3

oo

10

oo

v


28 3 K m f 0 Hy 5

62 6 Km to Merritt

8 106

I

III

II

146

I

I

I

IIIIIIIIIIIIII

I II

I

161i 2 S

I

I

1

III

II

JIIIII

I

201

I

II

I ilrI l

Il

206 13

IIII

I

III

II

I

II1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

I

I

I

2

jII

I

I

17S

Il

I

161

225

0

1

cl

a

73q

27 3 5

SYMBOLS

x

VroJ

0

I

Small outcrop

Outcrop area

Assumed fault

PitJtrench

Secondary rood

Trail

Shoreline

oo

10

I

3

I

341

lL

217

7Z

437

3 q

205

21

270

Swamp drainaoe boundary

Swamp

o Claim post


Cut old I picket line

B ozed line

oo

J

HZ7

Io

III

I1IIiIII

137 I

II

07 232

16B

238

221 l 1

II

231 207

I

2

A

ok

iLlI

4

1

IIi

NOTES

JI

1373Q

267

jI I

J I

I20 77

IVI lj

oo

J4S

178

78

IIII

jI

IJ

III

I r23

I I

1o

1 0

II

II

oo

o

76

138 12

27 2

211 14 7Iql

In

47 12

271 402

II

30

IX

II

IJI

4 3

lI i

I I

I

I

17

II

I

I1

i

I

II

II

and brushed out

I All odd numbered lines are blazed

2J Location of the N S btazed hnes as


ore yellOW flogged and ere the original

reconnaissance geochem surl8y lines

oo

n

135 107

II

II

q 15434

I

I

137 2t4 22

I

176 2n

2lot 1tZ198

II

I

I

II

II

oJ

o

BOB 574 701

LEGEND

oo

a

oo

x

184 300 3 3 4sq

J

jI

757 77

f

J

If1II

I1M 71

243 175 301 372

103 176 qq

It

294 171

1

227 IU

L

I

THUMB

LAKE

3

254 Apparent resistivity nm for n 2

tA

Ij

II

I

2 D Z62

I

I

I

oo

U

oo

10

710 7065 B

j3 1 2 I

iI

III

li4A 436HI HZ

4752 6

1I

IiI

II

II

3

II

I

1 JII

3 5 Sb4

I

II

2 23 0

I

7 8

y TI

I

If7

f3

II

I

1 III

f1

4

fJ

jf

J

MINERAL RESOURCES 81tANCH

ASSESSMENT REPORT

Q448

oo

V

II

jIII

I

II

I

148

I fI

i

I

oo

rt

2 7 6q z41

f

jr

f6 7i7

J

402 788 H

227

7 714

r

pIfi5

L

ILn

oo

J

oo

oo

o

J

III

L 15 00 N

LI4 00N

L13 OON

L12 00 N

L11 OON

LIO OON

L 9 00 N

L S OON

L 7 OON

L 6 00N

3

L 5 OON

L4 00N

q 2

IIL 3 00 N

L 2 00N

L I OON

L 0 00LCP

200I

Metres





314 377

1

5 2 685



APPARENT RESISTIVITY DATA a CONTOURS

Iq q

l58

SURVEY BY DRAWN BY DATE JOB No N TS SCALE SHEET No

J R A J R A Dec 19BI 81 15 92H I6W 2 500 4

1J

SOb 1204

S q 7 146780 71q

ZIO84

I

II

I

I

I J 35 128

8 3 a 7

I

x

I

i

1I

50 25 0 25 50 75 100

L13 00N

L II 00 N

L 9 00 N

L 7 00 N

L 5 00 N

po

M

po

M

po

M

po

M

po

M

INSTRUMENT A TIONHuntec M 4 Receiver

Phoenix IPT I Transmitter

Pole dipole array

Dipole length 50 m

Delay time 300 ms

lnteorotion time 65 ms

oo

It

lH

I

I

21 l l

H 3 0

1 6 z o

7 HI

Z Z

if07

iZ8

2 0

7 7 sz

I

oo

V

oo

rt l

I

s I 14 i636

n

1I

24

Z4 2

1059

402

28

j7

530 72

e o 24

I z 0

2

Ri

I 411 132f 7 7

18 e

II

ll121

1

I

Z28 30

I7 8 I 76

02 37

j

3 H

I

I Z 2

6

ihz 2

HI 14

1ISOj

1 210

I1 4

1556

t

t

I 1301

C3

5

2i1f

3

3 8

IU

MINERAL RESOURCES BRANCH

ASSESSMENT REPORT

Q1t4S

808

8 4

576

Z

oo

N

oo

o

CO

oo

42 j n 412

B 37 604 8n 3

68 80n 2

n

3 Zn

3 7

2n 2

3 8 en 3

0n 4

80n 4

1 8i

l52

0 Z378

n 3

n 2

78n

e 7 2n

3n 2

n 3

3 3n 4

IH2 Jff4

G04 1 21

5

84n 3

n 4

8 i

o6

I sH n

486

2

2

114

13

760n 2

i

28 3

I

631

I iV

3

3 7

3

i

30

n2

2 8 2 0n 2

21n 3

e4 2n 4

n 3

344 5 677n 4

IO 3i

5 78 64n 2

786 780

421 510n

06 606

2 3

27 0 8n 2

2 2 18n

Z

28n 3

2 7 2 3

2n 4

e 3 22

t n 5

3

n 2

227n 4

n 3

13

016 5 78n

lS7

30 2n

G 2 0 2 3n 2

n 32 2 5 2 7

20 21n 4

n 5

50 25 011 01

25 50 75 100 200I

Metres





GEOPHYSICAL a GEOCHEMICAL

INDUCED POLARIZATION

SURVEY

RESISTIVITY

SURVEY

PSEUDOSECTIONSa IP

SURVEY 8Y DRAWN BY DATE JOB No

81 15

N T S

92H 16W

SCALE SHEET No

5J R A Dec 1981J R A I 2 500

Documents

ASSESSMfNT REPORT IQqq8 - British Columbia