Upload
aubrey-reed
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Assessment of judges work.
Bert Maan
President District Court Zwolle-Lelystad 1992-2006
Organisation of a court:
4 sections Heads of sections (responsible for their section) Judging by single judge Judging by panel of 3 judges
Assessment
Quantity Quality
Required
Management information Automation Systems of distribution of work Schedules of hearings
Criminal cases
Schedules of hearings Distributing judges over hearings in the
schedule (6 months) P.m. appeals
Commercial section:
Numbers of hearings after first reply Cases where judgement id asked Management information;
Date of pronouncement of judgment Name of the case Name of the judge Looking around
Administrative section:
Cases distributed by number Following case flow Management information date judgement Schedule of hearings Registering date of judgement
Overall:
Management information each month Incoming cases; Finished cases
Withdrawn Settled Interlocutory judgement Final judgement
Quality
Risk: judge alone/single judge Judges
work in a court and in sections: Look at each other; Clerk/ judicial assistant also looks Report misbehaviour (informal)
Legal quality
Panel of three (criminal, commercial, administrative)
Colleague judges Judicial assistant Advocates Publication (rechtspraak.nl) Media Appeals/cassation
Quality management
Case-law discussion Presentations Internal training/education; Permanent education SSR Intervision Courses elsewhere
Legal resources
Texts of the law with comments; Library Internet
Open sources Restricted sources Rechtspraak.nl
Human resources policy-tools
periodic interview head of section annual talks with court president promotion personal file
Formal evaluation?
Does not exist; References in case of application Career system
Why not?
Starting point Selection Training before the job Training on the job Development as a person/judge Motivation
Discipline
Organisation prevents situations Control by colleagues First disciplinary body
Is very near: court president
Result
Good quality Motivated judges Feeling responsibility Love their profession Accidents?
Questions/observations?
Teçukkur ederim!