Upload
andres
View
120
Download
15
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Artificial Lift
Citation preview
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
ARTIFICIAL LIFT
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
6500
6000
5500
5000
4500
4000
0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
Outflow
Flow Rate ( STB/day )
Pw
f, p
si
Reservoir Inflow
Performance
INITIAL PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE
NATURAL FLOW
ARTIFICIAL LIFT ASSISTED PRODUCTION
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
6500
6000
5500
5000
4500
4000
0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
Outflow
Flow Rate ( STB/day )
Pw
f, p
si
Reservoir Inflow
Performance
NOT FLOWING
FINAL PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE
ARTIFICIAL LIFT ASSISTED PRODUCTION
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
6500
6000
5500
5000
4500
4000
0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
Outflow
Flow Rate ( STB/day )
Pw
f, p
si
Reservoir Inflow
Performance
BACK TO PRODUCTION BY
ARTIFICIAL LIFT
ARTIFICIAL LIFT ASSISTED PRODUCTION
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
ARTIFICIAL LIFT As pressure in the reservoir declines, the producing capacityof the wells will decline. The decline is caused by a decrease
in the ability of the reservoir to supply fluid to the well bore.
Methods are available to reduce the flowing well bottom hole
pressure by artificial means.
POZOS EN FLUJO NATURAL
BOMBEO CAVIDADES PROGRESIVAS (BCP) BOMBEO ELECTROSUMERGIBLE (BES)
BOMBEO MECANICO (BALANCIN)
GAS LIFT CONTINUO
GAS LIFT INTERMITENTE
CHAMBER LIFT
ARTIFICIAL PLUNGER LIFT
BOMBEO HIDRAULICO (pistn o jet)
NATURAL FLOW WELL
PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP (PCP) ELECTRICAL SUBMERSIBLE PUMP (ESP)
SUCKER ROD BEAM PUMP (BP)
CONTINUOUS
GAS LIFT (GL)
PLUNGER LIFT
INTERMITTENT GAS LIFT
CHAMBER LIFT
HYDRAULIC PUMP (piston or jet)
ARTIFICIAL PLUNGER LIFT
PLUNGER LIFT
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Ft./Lift
12,000
11,000
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 BPD
Typical Artificial Lift Application Range
Rod
Pumps
PC Pumps Hydraulic Lift Submersible Pump Gas Lift
Comparison of Lift Methods
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
System Efficiency by Artificial Lift Method
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
PCP Hydraulic Piston
Pumps
Beam Pump ESP Hydraulic Jet
Pump
Gas Lift
(Continuous)
Gas Lift
(Intermittent)
Artificial Lift Type
Ov
era
ll S
ys
tem
Eff
icie
nc
y (
%)
Comparison of Lift Methods
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
SCHEMATIC OF A CONTINUOUS GAS LIFT WELL
Gaslift valves
De
pth
Operating Valve
Packer
Tubing
Production Casing
Surface Casing
Gas Injection
Flowline
PressurePwh
Pwf Pr
Static
gradient
Gas Lift involves the supply of high
pressure gas to the casing/tubing annulus and its
injection into the tubing deep in the well. The
increased gas content of the produced fluid
reduces the average flowing density of the fluids
in the tubing, hence increasing the formation
drawdown and the well inflow rate.
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
video
SCHEMATIC OF A CONTINUOUS GAS LIFT WELL
Gaslift valves
Operating ValvePacker
Tubing
Production Casing
Surface Casing
Gas Injection
Flowline
SIDE POCKET MANDREL WITH GAS LIFT VALVE
../animaciones/GASLIFT_15MB.MPG
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Tubing Pressure Operated ValveCasing Pressure Operated Valve
Ppd
Piod
Ppd
Piod
Pressure chamber
Bellows
Stem
Ball
TYPES OF CONTINUOUS GAS LIFT VALVES
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Ab
Pc
Pt
Ap
Required Pressure to open the valve
Valve Mechanic
Casing Pressure Operated Valve
PdPo
PtPd=
R
1 - R
-
where R = Ap / Ab
Pd Po +Pt(1 R) R=
Required Dome pressure to get the
opening pressure at P, T:
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
14
GAS LIFT MANDRELS
SIDE POCKET
MANDRELS
CONVENTIONAL
MANDREL
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
15
RK / BK LATCH
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
16
KICKOVER TOOL
THE KICKOVER TOOL IS RUN ON WIRELINE
AND USED TO PULL AND SET GAS LIFT
VALVES. THE ABILITY TO WIRELINE
CHANGE-OUT GAS LIFT VALVES GIVES
GREAT FLEXIBILITY IN THE GAS LIFT
DESIGN
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
17
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
18
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
UNLOADING PROCESS OF A GAS LIFT WELL
Valve 1
Valve 2
Valve 3
Valve 1
Valve 2
Valve 3
Valve 1
Valve 2
Valve 3
Valve 1
Valve 2
Valve 3
Valve 1
Valve 2
Valve 3
Valve 1
Valve 2
Valve 3
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
closed
open
open
closed
open
closed
closed
Video 2
../animaciones/GL_Unloading_Sequence_rev6.exe
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
GAS INJECTION
PRESSURE
WELLHEAD
PRESSURE
AVERAGE.
RESERVOIR
PRESSURE
PRESSURE
DE
PT
H
BALANCE POINT
INJECTION POINT
BOTTOMHOLE
FLOWING
PRESSURE100 PSI
AVAILABLE
PRESSURE
PRESSURES AND PRESSURE GRADIENTS
VERSUS DEPTH IN CONTINUOUS GAS LIFT
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
GAS LIFT WELL PERFORMANCE
LIQ
UID
PR
OD
UC
TIO
N
RA
TE
, Q
L
GAS INJECTION RATE, Qgi
Available gas
volumeEonomic Optimum
Maximum liquid production
LIQUID PRODUCTION RATE, QL
BO
TT
OM
HO
LE
FL
OW
ING
PR
ES
SU
RE
, P
wf
Inflow Performance
IPR
Pr Excessive GLR
(a) Gas lift well analysis (b) Effect of gas injection rate
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
GAS INJECTION RATE, Qgi
LIQ
UID
RA
TE
, Q
L
Available Gas Volume
Inje
cti
on
Dep
th
Maximum Injection Depth
EFFECT OF THE POINT OF GAS INJECTION DEPTH
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Pwh pkoPsep
pvc1
pvc2
pcv3
pressured
ep
th
Opening pressure
Tubing flowing pressure
Available gas surface pressure
Closing pressure
GAS LIFT DESIGN FOR CASING PRESSURE OPERATED VALVES
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Gas Injection Rate
PRESSURE (PSI)
SUB-CRITICAL
FLOW
PCASING
PTUBING = 55%
ORIFICE FLOW
GA
S I
NJE
CT
ION
RA
TE
(M
MS
CF
/D)
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Different Injection Gas
Rates
Gas Passage through a RDO-5 Orifice Valve with a 1/2" Port
(163 deg F, Gas S.G. 0.83, Discharge Coefficient 0.84)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
Pressure psi
Gas F
low
Rate
MM
SC
F/D
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Gas Lift Performance Curve
x
x
x
x
x
xx
x
xx
LIFT-GAS INJECTION RATE
OR PRODUCTION COSTS
NE
T O
IL P
RO
DU
CT
ION
OR
RE
VE
NU
E
2
1
3
4
SLOPE = 1.0
Economic Limit
Technical
Optimum
1Kick-Off
Lift-Gas Requirement
2 Initial Oil Rate at Kick-off
3 Technical cut-off limit
4 Max. Oil Rate
x Incremental Lift-Gas Volume
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
OPTIMIZATION OF GAS LIFT GAS DISTRIBUTION
Qgi
Qo
Qgi
Qo
Qot
Optimum total field gas lift
performance curve
WELL 1
WELL 2
WELL n
QgitQgi
Qo
Qgi
Qo1
Qo2
Qon
n
Qoi
i=1
n
Qgi
i=1
Nodal
analysis
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
SCENARIOS
1. CONTNUOUS GAS INJECTION AND LIQUID
PRODUCTION.
2. CONTINUOUS GAS INJECTION AND NO LIQUID
PRODUCTION.
3. THE WELL DOES NOT RECEIVE GAS AND THERE
IS NOT LIQUID PRODUCTION
GAS LIFT WELL DIAGNOSIS
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
C
B
A
Pr
QL
QA QB QC
PrInj.Pressure .
Val. 1
Val. 2
Val. 3
A
B
C
Pwh.
Dep
th
GAS LIFT WELL DIAGNOSIS CONTINUOUS GAS INJECTION AND LIQUID PRODUCTION SCENARIO
DETERMINATION OF THE WORKING GAS LIFT VALVE
When there is not consistency in the data, then a hole in the tubing or multiple injection points
may exist, in which case a temperature log is necessary to arrive at a final conclusion.
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
GAS LIFT WELL DIAGNOSIS
CONTINUOUS GAS INJECTION AND NO LIQUID PRODUCTION SCENARIO
Under this scenario the well is circulating gas due to the following possible causes:
Hole in the tubing
No transference of the injection point to the next valve
Formation damage restricts the inflow capacity of the reservoir
Organic or inorganic deposits in the tubing or flowline
The causes of no transference of the injection point to the next deeper valve are:
High tubing pressure
Low gas injection pressure
Under this scenario the well is circulating gas due to the following possible causes:
Hole in the tubing
No transference of the injection point to the next valve
Formation damage restricts the inflow capacity of the reservoir
Organic or inorganic deposits in the tubing or flowline
The causes of no transference of the injection point to the next deeper valve are:
High tubing pressure
Low gas injection pressure
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
GAS LIFT WELL DIAGNOSIS NO GAS INJECTION AND NO LIQUID PRODUCTION SCENARIO
Possible causes:
Gas injection valve closed
Gas line broken
Gas line restriction due to hydrates formation (Freezing Problems)
High gas lift valve opening pressure
Possible causes:
Gas injection valve closed
Gas line broken
Gas line restriction due to hydrates formation (Freezing Problems)
High gas lift valve opening pressure
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
CONTINUOUS GAS LIFT
Range of application
Medium-light oil (15 - 40 API)
GOR 0 - 4000 SCF / STB
Depth limited to compression capacity
Low capacity to reduce the bottom hole flowing pressure
High initial investment (Gas compressors cost)
Installation cost low (slick line job)
Low operational and maintenance cost
Simplified well completions
Flexibility - can handle rates from 10 to 50,000 bpd
Can best handle sand / gas / well deviation
Intervention relatively less expensive
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
SUCKER RODS
PLUNGER
STANDING
VALVEFLUID
PLUNGER MOVING DOWN PLUNGER MOVING UP
TRAVELING
VALVE
FLUID WORKINGBARREL
CounterBalance
Pitman
Casing
Tubing
Sucker Rods
Plunger
Traveling Valve
Standing Valve
Horse Head
Elevator
Polish Rod
Stuffing Box
Flowline
Gas linePrime Mover
Gear Box
Walking Beam
ROD PUMPING SYSTEM
ANIM
crank
../animaciones/RODLIFT_20.MPG
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
ROD PUMPING SYSTEMSUBSURFACE PUMP COMPONENTS
BARREL
SUCKER ROD
PLUNGER
BALLS ANDSEATS
STANDINGVALVE
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Extra heavy-light oil (8.5 - 40 API)
Oil Production: 20 - 2000 STB/day
GOR: 2.000 PCN / BN (can handle free gas, but pump
efficiency is decreased)
Maximum depth: 9000 feet for light oil and 5000 feet
for heavy-extra heavy oil
Subsurface equipment stands up to 500 F
Tolerant to solids production (5-10 % volume)
Tolerant to pumping off conditions
ROD PUMPING SYSTEM
RANGE OF APPLICATION
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Mark II
Low
Profile Air Balanced
Beam Balanced
Drawings Courtesy of Lufkin Industries, Inc. Lufkin, Texas
Types of Pumping Units
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
1. Mtodos de Levantamiento Artificial
2. Situacin Actual de los Mtodos de Levantamiento
Artificial en Venezuela
3. Descripcin de los diferentes Sistemas de
Levantamiento Artificial
4. Estado del Arte del Levantamiento Artificial
BEAM PUMPING SYSTEM
(AIR BALANCED UNIT)
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
How can we change the flow rate ?
Change the pump stroke length
Typical range 54 306 inches
Change the number of strokes
Typical range 5 15 spm
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Downhole Pumps
Insert Pump - fits inside the production tubing and is
seated in nipple in the tubing.
Tubing Pump - is an integral part of the production
tubing string.
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Insert Pumps
Pump is run inside the tubing attached to sucker rods
Pump size is limited by tubing size
Lower flow rates than tubing pump
Easily removed for repair
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Insert Pump
Ball & seat
Seating nipple
Standing valve
Barrel
Traveling valve
Plunger
Tubing
Cage
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Tubing Pumps
Integral part of production tubing string
Cannot be removed without removing production
tubing
Permits larger pump sizes
Used where higher flow rates are needed
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Tubing Pump
Ball & seat
Standingvalve
Barrel
Travelingvalve
Plunger
Tubing
Cage
Connectionw/tubing
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Tubing Anchors
Often a device is used to prevent the
tubing string from moving with the rod
pump during actuation. A tubing anchor
prevents the tubing from moving, and
allows the tubing to be left in tension which
reduces rod wear.
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
FBreathing
Traveling valve closed;
portion of fluid load trans-
ferred to rods. Tubing relieved
of load contracts. Tension in
tubing at minimum for cycle.
Buckling occurs from pump
to neutral point
UpstrokeDownstroke
Standing valve closed; full
fluid load stretched tubing
down to most elongated
position. Tension in tubing
at maximum for cycle. No
buckling
No buckling
Neutral point
Buckling
Tubing Anchors
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Pump Displacement
(Sizing)
PD = 0.1484 x Ap (in2) x Sp (in/stroke) x N
(strokes/min)PD = pump displacement (bbl/day)
Ap = cross sectional area of piston (in2)
Sp = plunger stroke (in)
N = pumping speed (strokes/min)
0.1484 = 1440 min/day / 9702 in3/bbl
Manufacturers put the constant and Aptogether as K for each plunger size, so
PD = K x Sp X N
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Volumetric efficiency
Calculated pump displacement will differ from surface rate due to:
Slip/leakage of the plunger
Stroke length stretch
Viscosity of fluid
Gas breakout on chamber
Reservoir formation factor (Bo) defines higher downhole volume
Volumetric efficiency Ev = Q / PD
Typical values : 70 80%
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Exercise
A)Determine the pump speed (SPM) needed
to produce 400 STB/d at the surface with a
rod pump having a 2-inch diameter
plunger, a 80-inch effective plunger stroke
length, and a plunger efficiency due to
slippage of 80%. The oil formation volume
factor is 1.2.
B)If my pump speed is not to exceed 10 SPM
what is an alternative plunger design ?
Sol.
Solutions to Exercises/EXERCISE 14 SOLUTION.ppt
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Exercise (Equations)
A) SPM = (q x Bo / Ev) / (0.1484 x Ap x Sp)
B) Ap = (q x Bo / Ev) / (0.1484 x SPM x Sp)
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Rod Design Considerations
Weight of rod string
Weight of fluid
Maximum stress in rod
Yield strength of rod material
Stretch
Buckling
Fatigue loading
Inertia of rod and fluid as goes through a stroke
Buoyancy
Friction
Well head pressure
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Counterweight
Balances the load on the surface prime
mover
A pump with no counterweight would have
a cyclic load on the prime mover load
only on upstroke
Sized on an average load through the
cycle
Equivalent to buoyant weight of rods plus half
the weight of the fluid
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Prime Mover HorsePower -
Estimations
Hydraulic Horsepower = power required to lift a given volume of fluid
vertically in a given period of time
= 7.36 x 10-6 x Q x G x L
where Q = rate b/d (efficiency corrected), G= SG of fluid, L = net lift
in feet
Frictional Horsepower
= 6.31 x 10-7 x W x S x N
Where W=weight of rods in lb, S=stroke length,N=SPM
Polished Rod Horsepower (PRHP)= sum (hydraulic, frictional)
Prime mover HP = PRHP x CLF / surface efficiency
where CLF = cyclic load factor dependent on model of motor typical
range 1.1 to 2.0
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Gas Separators
A rod pump is
designed to pump or
lift liquids only. Any
entrained gas
(formation gas) must
be separated from the
produced liquids and
allowed to vent up the
annulus. If gas is
allowed to enter the
pump, damage will
often occur due to gas
lock or fluid pound.
WFP
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Pump Problems
Downhole pump failures can result from:
Abrasion from solids
Corrosion (galvanic, H2S embrittlement, or acid)
Scale buildup
Normal wear seal and valves
Gas locking
Stress from fluid pounding
Rod breaks
Plunger jams
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Rod Pumping
Advantages Possible to pump off
Best understood by field personnel
Some pumps can handle sand or trash
Usually the cheapest (where suitable)
Low intake pressure capabilities
Readily accommodates volume changes
Works in high temperatures
Reliable diagnostic and troubleshooting tools available
Disadvantages Maximum volume
decreases rapidly with
depth
Susceptible to free gas
Frequent repairs
Deviated wellbores are
difficult
Reduced tubing bore
Subsurface safety difficult
Doesnt utilize formation
gas
Can suffer from severe
corrosion
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Identifying Problems with
Rod Pumping
Dynamometer
Measures the load applied to the top rod in a string
of sucker rods (the polished rod)
A dynamometer card is a recording of the loads on
the polished rod throughout one full pumping cycle
(upstroke and downstroke)
A dynamometer load cell can be permanently
installed on a well to continuously monitor rod loads
and dynamics. This device is called a Pump-off
Controller
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
CONVENTIONAL DYNAGRAPH CARD
Displacement
Lo
ad
Upstroke
Downstroke
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Dynamometer Card
B
F
EC
D
A
Maximum load
End of downstroke
and beginningof upstroke
End of upstroke
and beginningof downstroke
Downstroke
Upstroke
Minimum load
Polished Rod Position (0 - stroke
length)
Po
lish
ed
Ro
d L
oa
d
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Sonolog Fluid Level Survey
Sound reflection
Tubing collars
Fluid level
Sonolog
Charge ignited
Fluid level
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
BEAM PUMPING WELL OPTIMIZATION
REAL TIME
DATA
MONITORING
Variables
Dynagraph Card
Motor Current Demand
Liquid Production Rate
Production Gas Liquid Ratio
Water Cut
Tubing Head Pressure and Temperature
Casing Head Pressure and Temperature
Bottom Hole Flowing Pressure and Temperature
(fluid level in the annulus)
Pumping Velocity
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Variables which could change once a year
Data required for calculations at a particular point
in time during the life of the reservoir :
Reservoir Average Pressure and Depth
Stroke Length
Pump Configuration
Tubing Configuration
Flowline Configuration
Production Casing Size
Oil PVT data
BEAM PUMPING WELL OPTIMIZATION
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
AUTOMATIC BEAM PUMPING WELL
TARGET OPTIMIZATION
Displacement
Lo
ad
Displacement
Lo
ad
(a) Full pump card
(b) Pump off card
The conditions of an optimized beam pumping
well are maximum production with a dynamic
fluid level at 100 feet above the pump or sufficient
submergence of the pump to produce a full pump
card .
For low productivity wells the full pump card
Condition is difficult to maintain and a pump off
condition is generated. When pump off condition
is detected, the pumping unit is shut down by a
pump off controller for a predetermined period
of time to allow fluid build up in the casing-tubing
annulus. The shut down time may be determined
from a build up test.
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
PUMP ROD PERFORMANCE FROM
CONVENTIONAL DYNAGRAPH CARD
Displacement
Lo
ad
(b) Restriction in the well
Displacement
Lo
ad
Displacement
Lo
ad
(d) Excessive friction in
the pumping system
(c) Sticking Plunger
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
PUMP ROD PERFORMANCE FROM
CONVENTIONAL DYNAGRAPH CARD
Displacement
Lo
ad
Displacement
Lo
ad
(e) Liquid pound (f) Gas pound
Displacement
Lo
ad
Displacement
Lo
ad
(g) Gas lock (h) Plunger undertravel
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
PUMP OFF CONTROLLER
Pump off Controller
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Typical ESP Installation
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
The Basic ESP System
100 to 100,000 BPD
Installed to 15,000 ft
Equipment diameters from
3.38 to 11.25
Casing Sizes - 4 1/2 to 13
5/8
Variable Speed Available
Metallurgies to Suit
Applications
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Extra heavy - light (8.5 - 40 API)
Gas Volume at bottom hole conditions:
less than 15 %
Maximum Temperature: 500 F
Very sensible to solids production and pump
off condition.
ELECTRICAL SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
Range of Application
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Each "stage" consists
of an impeller and a
diffuser. The impeller
takes the fluid and
imparts kinetic energy
to it. The diffuser
converts this kinetic
energy into potential
energy (head).
The Basic ESP System
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
ELECTRICAL SUBMERSIBLE PUMP SCHEMATIC
video
Impeller
Diffuser
Shaft
Oil flows up, through
suction side of
impeller, and is
discharged with
higher pressure, out
through the diffuser.
../animaciones/ESP_15MB.MPG
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Pwh
ESP
Pwh
Pwf Pr
Pdn
Pup
P
gas
Pwf
PdnPup
Pressure
Dep
th
ESP PRESSURE GRADIENT PROFILE
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
FLOW RATE, QL
FL
OW
ING
PR
ES
SU
RE
00
P P
Discharge Pressure, Pdn
Intake
Pressure,
Pup
NODAL ANALYSIS FOR A PUMPING SYSTEM
HP = 1.72x10-5P (QoBo + QwBw)
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved FLOW RATE, QL
00
HE
AD
, ft
/ s
tag
e
HEAD CAPACITY
PUMP EFFICIENCY
OPTIMUM
RANGE
HORSE POWER
SP. GR: =1.0
HP
MO
TO
R L
OA
D
PU
MP
EF
FIC
IEN
CY,%
0
100
ELECTRICAL SUBMERSIBLE PUMP PERFORMANCE CURVE
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
ESP SELECTION
4) HORSE POWER REQ.(HP) = 1.72x10-5P (QoBo + QwBw)
1) TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD = P / fluid density
2) FROM TYPICAL PUMP PERFORMANCE CURVE
DETERMINE HEAD (FT) PER STAGE AND EFFICIENCY
3) NUMBER OF STAGES =
TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD
FEET/STAGE
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Progressive Cavity Pump
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP SYSTEM
Rotor
Stator
Casing
Tubing
Rod String
Flowline Wellhead
Drive head
Gear Box
Electric motor
Stop
pin
ROTOR
STATOR
When the rotor and stator are in place,
defined sealed cavities are formed. As the
rotor turns within the stator, the cavities
progress in an upward direction. When fluid
enters a cavity, it is actually driven to the
surface in a smooth steady flow.video
../../../CURSOS METODOS DE PRODUCCION/introduccin al negocio petrolero/introduccin al a las operaciones petroleras/PCP_15MB.MPG
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP SYSTEM
When the rotor and stator are in place,
defined sealed cavities are formed. As the
rotor turns within the stator, the cavities
progress in an upward direction. When fluid
enters a cavity, it is actually driven to the
surface in a smooth steady flow.
video
../../../CURSOS METODOS DE PRODUCCION/introduccin al negocio petrolero/introduccin al a las operaciones petroleras/PCP_15MB.MPG
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Extra heavy Light oil (8.5 - 40 API)
Production Capacity: 20-3500 STB/day
GOR: 0 -5000 SCF/ STB
Maximum Depth:
- 3000 feet: 500 - 3000 STB/day heavy-extra heavy oil
- 7000 feet : < 500 STB/day heavy-extra heavy oil
Maximum Temperature for subsurface pump: 250 F
Low profile surface components (very low environmental impact)
Does not create emulsions
Does not gas lock.
PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP SYSTEM
Range of Application and Capabilities
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP SYSTEM
Range of Application and Capabilities (cont.)
Able to produce:
High concentrations of sand.
High viscosity fluid.
High percentages of free gas.
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Progressive Cavity Pump
Advantages
Simple two piece design
Capable of handling
solids & high viscosity
fluids
Will not emulsify fluid
High volumetric
efficiencies
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Production rates 3500 bbls/day
Lift capacity 7000 ft.
Elastomer incompatible with certain
fluids/gases
Aromatics (12%)
H2S (max. 6%), CO2(max. 30%)
Other chemical additives
Max. Temperature up to 250 F.
Progressive Cavity Pump
Limitations
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
APPLICATIONS:
Horizontal wells
Deep wells
Deviated wells with severe dogleg
PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP
WITH BOTTOM DRIVE MOTOR
Progressing
Cavity Pump
Tubing
Intake
Gear Box &
Flex Drive
Protector
Motor Motor
Protect
or
Gearbo
x
Intake
Stator
RotorCable
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Applications
Heavy oil and bitumen.
Production of solids-laden
fluids.
Medium to sweet crude.
Agricultural areas.
Urban areas.
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Progressing Cavity Pump Basics
Characteristics
Interference fit between the rotor and
stator creates a series of isolated
cavities
Rotation of the rotor causes the cavities
to move or progress from one end of
the pump to the other
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Progressing Cavity Pump Basics
Displacement
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Non Pulsating
Pump Generates Pressure Required To
Move Constant Volume
Flow is a function of RPM
Progressing Cavity Pump Basics
Flow Characteristics
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Progressing Cavity Pump Basics
Pulsationless Flow
QFLOW RATE = ACAVITY AREAVFLUID CAVITY VELOCITY
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
CONVENTIONAL 1:2 MULTILOBE 2:3
Progressing Cavity Pump Basics
PC Pump Types
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Progressing Cavity Pump Basics
Rotation
The Rotor turns eccentrically
within the Stator.
Movement is actually a
combination of two movements:
Rotation about its own axis
Rotation in the opposite
direction of its own axis about
the axis of the Stator.
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Eccentricity
Stator Pitch
(one full turn)
RotorStator
Progressing Cavity Pump Basics
PCP Description
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Progressing Cavity Pump Basics
PCP Description
E4E
D
P
D
P = Stator Pitch length
(one full turn = two cavities)
D = Minor Diameter of Stator
Major Diameter of Stator
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
The geometry of the helical gear formed by the rotor and
the stator is fully defined by the following parameters:
the diameter of the Rotor = D (in.)
eccentricity = E (in.)
pitch length of the Stator = P (in.)
The minimum length required for the pump to create
effective pumping action is the pitch length. This is the
length of one seal line.
Progressing Cavity Pump Basics
Pumping Principle
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Each full turn of the Rotor produces two cavities of fluid.
Pump displacement = Volume produced for each turn of
the rotor
V = C *D*E*P
C = Constant (SI: 5.76x10-6, Imperial: 5.94x10-4)
At zero head, the flow rate is directionally proportional to
the rotational speed N:
Q = V*N
Progressing Cavity Pump Basics
Pumping Principle
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
Given:
Pump eccentricity (e) = 0.25 in
Pump rotor diameter (D) = 1.5 in
Pump stator pitch (p) = 6.0 in
Pump speed (N) = 200 RPM
Find:
Pump displacement
Theoretical fluid rate
Example
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
HYDRAULIC JET PUMP
FLUIDOS
BOQUILLA
DIFUSORREVESTIDOR
FORMACION
FLUIDO DEPOTENCIA
FLUIDS
NOZZLE
THROAT
DIFUSSER
FORMATION
CASING
POWER FLUID
PRODUCTION
INLET
CHAMBER
COMBINED
FLUID
RETURN
DIFUSSER
NOZZLE
THROAT
video
../../../CURSOS%20METODOS%20DE%20PRODUCCION/introduccin%20al%20negocio%20petrolero/introduccin%20al%20a%20las%20operaciones%20petroleras/HYDRAULIC_19MB.MPG
Copyright 2007, , All rights reserved
OPPORTUNITIES FOR APLICATION:
Can be installed in small tubing
diameter (down to 2-3/8) and with
coiled tubing (1-1/4).
Highly deviated/horizontal wells with
small hole diameter.
Can be hydraulically recovered without
using wireline.
Low equipment costs
No moving parts
High solids content
High GOR
No depth limitations
Extra heavy-light oil (8.5 - 40 API)
Production: 100 -20000 STB/day
HYDRAULIC JET PUMP