Upload
vonga
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supplementary information
1. Method
1.1. Inclusion/Exclusion criteria
1.1.1. Inclusion criteria
Articles containing the search terms (either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) and
information on schizophrenia/bipolar disorder were included, regardless of whether the
information contained in the article was correct or not.
Example:
Articles containing either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder that described:
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, individuals with schizophrenia or bipolar
disorder, medical and social services for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder,
incidents and events that involved individuals with schizophrenia or bipolar
disorder, and so on.
1.1.2. Exclusion criteria
Articles containing the search terms (either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) but
containing no information on either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder were excluded.
Articles containing metaphorical usage of either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder were
1
also excluded.
Examples:
Articles containing either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder that described an
individual’s professional career, but did not contain information on schizophrenia
or bipolar disorder.
Articles containing either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder that indicated or
announced other articles and did not contain information on either schizophrenia
or bipolar disorder.
1.2. Coding frame
The most prominent theme of the article was coded. When an article included multiple
themes, the most prominent theme was found by the heading, an amount of paragraphs
on each theme, and the order of themes in the article.
1.2.1. Negative category
Articles containing stigmatising information, for example, negative incidents such as
murder or suicide, and negative portrayal of an individual with either schizophrenia or
bipolar disorder.
1.2.1.1. Danger subcategory
2
This included articles linking danger and either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
(regardless of whether the reported link was true or not).
Examples:
Articles on violent or threatening crime by an individual with either schizophrenia
or bipolar disorder.
Articles that linked danger and either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
Articles that described either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder as representative of
conditions that have dangerous elements (e.g., doubt about the individual being
affected by either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder was removed).
Articles about legislation on the “Medical Care and Treatment for Persons Who
Have Caused Serious Cases Under the Condition of Insanity” focusing danger
rather than treatment.
Articles on mock cases for mock trials for initiation in the citizen judge system, in
which the defendant committed a murder as an expression of schizophrenia.
Articles on prisoners suspected to be affected by either schizophrenia or bipolar
disorder.
1.2.1.2. Suicide and self-injury subcategory
3
This included articles that linked suicide and self-injury and either schizophrenia or
bipolar disorder.
Examples:
Articles on the suicide and self-injury of individuals with either schizophrenia or
bipolar disorder.
Articles on suicide and either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder from an
epidemiological viewpoint.
1.2.1.3. Criminal victimisation and severe mistreatment subcategory
These articles focused on extremely negative attitudes towards an individual with either
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and criminal victimisation.
Examples:
Articles on severe mistreatment or abuse by a carer.
Articles on the joint suicide of individuals with either schizophrenia or bipolar
disorder and carers due to great suffering from schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
Articles on severe treatment conditions in mental health care (e.g., abuse).
Articles on medical malpractice through which patients died.
1.2.1.4. Strange, inept or burdensome subcategory
This included articles with negative attitudes towards individuals with either
4
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder not included in other three negative subcategories.
Examples:
Articles on minor crimes (e.g., stealing).
Articles on minor criminal victimisation (e.g., fraud).
Articles on opinions that a diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder should
be kept secret.
1.2.2. Positive category
Articles containing anti-stigmatising information, for example, correct information on
either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, information promoting receiving treatment, and
information on improving social attitudes towards individuals with either schizophrenia
or bipolar disorder.
1.2.2.1. Explaining either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder subcategory
This included articles explaining either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and positive
portrayals of individuals with either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
Examples:
Explanations of cause, treatment, prevalence, and symptoms of either
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
Explanations of biological, psychosocial, and general explanations of either
5
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
Positive articles on individuals with either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
Articles on research achievements.
1.2.2.2. Health service inadequacies and improvements subcategory
This included articles on mental health services used by individuals with either
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, mental health policy and its improvement, and similar
topics.
Examples:
Articles on mental health policy.
Articles on hospitals and clinics and the services provided.
Articles promoting community mental health care.
Articles on activities of service user’s organizations.
Articles on social security.
1.2.2.3. Stigma, discrimination and public education subcategory
This included articles on stigma and discrimination with anti-stigmatising messages.
Examples:
Negative articles on discriminative activity against individuals with either
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
6
Announcements of events for public education.
Book reviews intended to educate readers about either schizophrenia or bipolar
disorder.
Articles promoting receiving mental health care at early stages.
1.2.2.4. Renaming subcategory
This included articles on the renaming of schizophrenia.
Examples:
Announcements of renaming
Explanations of the reason and purpose of renaming
Opinions on renaming.
1.3. Statistical Analyses
1.3.1. Change in trend of the ratio of articles that linked schizophrenia and danger
across renaming: analysis excluding outlier
To investigate the change in trend after renaming, the 20-year period was divided into
two decades: before and after renaming. To exclude the effect of an outlier, the highest
year was excluded. The ratio (number of articles on schizophrenia and danger in a
year)/(number of articles on bipolar disorder and danger in a year) was used as a
variable of interest. As some years contained no articles on bipolar disorder and danger,
7
one was added to the number of articles for both disorders in each year to avoid a
denominator of zero. Pearson’s correlation analyses were conducted between the ratio
and number of years passed. Fisher’s r-to-z transformation was performed to examine
difference in correlation coefficients between the two periods.
1.3.2. Change in trend of the ratio of articles that linked schizophrenia and danger
across renaming: dividing the 20-year period at 2001 or 2003
The 20-year period was divided into two periods at 2001 or 2003. The ratio (number of
articles on schizophrenia and danger in a year)/(number of articles on bipolar disorder
and danger in a year) was used as a variable of interest. As some years contained no
articles on bipolar disorder and danger, one was added to the number of articles for both
disorders in each year to avoid a denominator of zero. Pearson’s correlation analyses
were implemented to examine association between the ratio and number of years
passed. We have conducted Fisher’s r-to-z transformation to examine difference in
correlations between the two periods.
1.3.3. Change in trend of the ratio of articles that linked schizophrenia and danger
across renaming: discarding the first and the last year
The years 1992 and 2011 were discarded. To investigate the change in trend after
8
renaming, the 18-year period was divided into two 9-year periods (before and after
renaming). The ratio (number of articles on schizophrenia and danger in a
year)/(number of articles on bipolar disorder and danger in a year) was used as a
variable of interest. As some years contained no articles on bipolar disorder and danger,
one was added to the number of articles for both disorders in each year to avoid a
denominator of zero. Correlation between the ratio and number of years passed was
examined using Pearson’s correlation analyses. Fisher’s r-to-z transformation was
performed to examine difference in correlations between the two periods.
1.3.4. Change in trend of the ratio of articles that linked schizophrenia and danger
across renaming: adding different numbers to the numerator and denominator
To investigate the change in trend after renaming, the 20-year period was divided into
two decades (before and after renaming). The ratio (number of articles on schizophrenia
and danger in a year)/(number of articles on bipolar disorder and danger in a year) was
used as a variable of interest. As some years contained no articles on bipolar disorder
and danger, 0.5 and two were added to the number of articles for both disorders in each
year to avoid a denominator of zero. Pearson’s correlation analyses were performed
9
between the ratio and number of years passed. Fisher’s r-to-z transformation was
conducted to investigate difference in correlations between the two periods.
1.3.5. Difference in trend of number of report of individuals with an expression of
mental illness who behaved dangerously toward others or themselves
Data were extracted from online database provided by the Japanese Ministry of Health,
Labour and Welfare (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 1990-2011). The number
of reports from 1992 to 2011 was searched. To investigate the change in trend after
renaming, the 20-year period was divided into two decades: the period from 1992 to
2001 and the period from 2002 to 2011. Pearson’s correlation analyses were performed
between the ratio and number of years passed. To examine difference in correlations
between the two periods, Fisher’s r-to-z transformation was implemented.
1.3.6. Difference in trend of number of mandatory hospitalisations
Data were extracted from online database provided by the Japanese Ministry of Health,
Labour and Welfare (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 1990-2011). The number
of mandatory hospitalisations from 1992 to 2011 was searched. To investigate the
change in trend after renaming, the 20-year period was divided into two decades: the
period from 1992 to 2001 and the period from 2002 to 2011. Association between the
10
ratio and number of years passed was investigated using Pearson’s correlation analyses.
Further, in order to investigate difference in correlation coefficients, Fisher’s r-to-z
transformation was utilised.
2. Results
2.1. Change in trend of the ratio of articles that linked schizophrenia and danger across
renaming: analysis excluding outlier
The ratio was highest in 2002. In case where 2002 was excluded as an outlier, there was
an increase in the number of reports over time before renaming (r=0.54, R2=0.30,
SD=14.69, p=0.104), and a decrease over time after renaming (r=-0.53, R2=0.28,
SD=11.46, p=0.140). The change across renaming was significant (Z=2.16, p=0.031).
2.2 Change in trend of the ratio of articles that linked schizophrenia and danger across
renaming: dividing the 20-year period at 2001 or 2003
When the time period was divided at 2001, there was an increase in the number of
reports over time during the period before 2001 (r=0.44, R2=0.20, SD=15.59, p=0.232),
and a significant decrease over time during the period after 2001 (r=-0.69, R2=0.48,
SD=15.25, p=0.019). The change across renaming remained significant (Z=2.46,
11
p=0.014).
When the time period was divided at 2003, there was a significant increase in the
number of reports over time during the period before 2003 (r=0.69, R2=0.47, SD=16.77,
p=0.020), and a decrease over time during the period after 2003 (r=0.53, R2=0.28,
SD=11.46, p=0.140). The significance in change of trends survived (Z=2.66, p=0.008).
2.3. Change in trend of the ratio of articles that linked schizophrenia and danger across
renaming: discarding the first and the last year
When 1992 and 2011 were discarded, there was an increase in the number of reports
over time before renaming (r=0.41, R2=0.17, SD=15.32, p=0.273), and a significant
decrease over time after renaming (r=0.67, R2=0.45, SD=16.69, p=0.047). The change
across renaming was significant (Z=2.17, p=0.030).
2.4. Change in trend of the ratio of articles that linked schizophrenia and danger across
renaming: adding different number to numerator and denominator
When 0.5 was added to the number of articles for both schizophrenia and bipolar
disorder, there was an increase in the number of reports over time before renaming
(r=0.29, R2=0.08, SD=33.46, p=0.423), and a significant decrease over time after
renaming (r=0.67, R2=0.44, SD=34.21, p=0.036). The change across renaming was still
12
significant (Z=2.05, p=0.040).
In case where two was added to the number of articles for both schizophrenia and
bipolar disorder, there was a significant increase in the number of reports over time
before renaming (r=0.76, R2=0.58, SD=6.64, p=0.011), and a decrease over time after
renaming (r=-0.62, R2=0.38, SD=8.27, p=0.056). The change of trends remained
significant (Z=3.22, p=0.001).
2.5. Difference in trend of the ratio of number of reports of individuals with an
expression of mental illness who behaved dangerously toward others or themselves
The analyses demonstrated that there was a significant increase in the number of reports
over time before renaming (r=0.87, R2=0.75, SD=857.69, p=0.001), and a significant
increase over time after renaming (r=0.97, R2=0.95, SD=520.58, p<0.001). There was
no significant difference in trends across 2003 (Z=-1.66, p=0.096).
2.6. Difference in trend of number of mandatory hospitalisations
The analyses demonstrated that there was a significant increase in the number of
mandatory hospitalisations over time before renaming (r=0.93, R2=0.86, SD=286.53,
p<0.001), and a significant increase over time after renaming (r=0.96, R2=0.93,
SD=104.01, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in trends before and after
13
2003 (Z=-0.64, p=0.526).
Figure legends
Supplementary Figure 1. Articles in the analysis containing the previous and new
names for schizophrenia.
Supplementary Figure 2. Articles in the analysis containing bipolar disorder.
Supplementary Figure 3. Transition of the number of articles from 1992 to
2011containing the previous name for schizophrenia (Seishin-bunretsu-byo), the new
name for schizophrenia (Togo-sitcho-syo), and both.
Supplementary Figure 4. Change in trend of the ratio of all articles, negative articles,
and positive articles on schizophrenia to that of bipolar disorder (a) Change in trend of
the ratio of articles on schizophrenia to bipolar disorder (from r=0.31, R2=0.09,
SD=3.24, p=0.390 to r=-0.20, R2=0.04, SD=2.75, p=0.589, Z=0.96, p=0.337) (b)
Change in trend of the ratio of negative articles on schizophrenia to that of bipolar
disorder (from r=0.21, R2=0.04, SD=19.09, p=0.560 to r=-0.49, R2=0.24, SD=8.20,
p=0.153, Z=1.40, p=0.162) (c) Change in trend of the ratio of positive articles on
schizophrenia to that of bipolar disorder (from r=0.44, R2=0.19, SD=1.31, p=0.204 to
14
r=-0.12, R2=0.01, SD=2.30, p=0.744, Z=1.10, p=0.269).
Supplementary Figure 5. Change in trend of the ratio of the number of articles on
schizophrenia to those on bipolar disorder in each subcategory (a) Change in trend of
the ratio of articles on schizophrenia to those on bipolar disorder on suicide and self-
injury (from r=0.32, R2=0.10, SD=0.74, p=0.362 to r=0.47, R2=0.22, SD=2.48, p=0.173,
Z=-0.32, p=0.749) (b) Change in trend of the ratio of articles on schizophrenia and
criminal victimization and severe mistreatment to those on bipolar disorder (from r=-
0.48, R2=0.23, SD=4.41, p=0.162 to r=0.54, R2=0.29, SD=7.05, p=0.108, Z=-2.10,
p=0.036) (c) Change in trend of the ratio of articles on schizophrenia and strange, inept,
or burdensome to those on bipolar disorder (from r=0.70, R2=0.49, SD=2.65, p=0.025 to
r=0.17, R2=0.03, SD=2.57, p=0.636, Z=1.29, p=0.197) (d) Change in trend of the ratio
of articles on schizophrenia and explaining to those on bipolar disorder (from r=0.39,
R2=0.15, SD=1.28, p=0.268 to r=0.10, R2=0.01, SD=1.98, p=0.786, Z=0.58, p=0.559)
(e) Change in trend of the ratio of articles on schizophrenia and health service
inadequacies and improvements to those on bipolar disorder (from r=0.19, R2=0.04,
SD=2.79, p=0.592 to r=0.13, R2=0.02, SD=8.74, p=0.718, Z=0.12, p=0.904) (f) Change
15
in trend of the ratio of articles on schizophrenia and stigma, discrimination, and public
education to those on bipolar disorder (from r=0.33, R2=0.11, SD=1.52, p=0.357 to r=-
0.34, R2=0.12, SD=2.98, p=0.330, Z=1.31, p=0.192) (g) Change in trend of the ratio of
articles on schizophrenia and renaming to those on bipolar disorder (from r=0.53,
R2=0.28, SD=10.63, p=0.114 to r=-0.68, R2=0.46, SD=2.90, p=0.032, Z=2.65, p=0.008)
16
Reference
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 1990-2011. Patient survey, portal site of
official statistics of Japan. (http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/NewList.do?
tid=000001031167, last accessed: 1st Dec 2015)
17
Supplementary Table1. Classification of articles containing bipolar disorder
Entire period*
Period before
renaming **
Period after
renaming***
Category
Negative 24.57% 18.82% 27.73%
Positive 75.43% 81.18% 72.27%
Negative subcategory
Danger 11.24% 7.53% 13.27%
Suicide and self-injury 3.24% 5.91% 1.77%
Criminal victimisation and severe mistreatment 5.14% 3.23% 6.19%
Strange, inept, or burdensome 4.95% 2.15% 6.49%
Positive subcategory
Explaining schizophrenia/bipolar disorder 39.05% 38.71% 39.23%
Health service inadequacies and improvement 13.71% 16.13% 12.39%
Stigma, discrimination, and public education 22.67% 26.34% 20.65%
Renaming 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
*from 08/1992 to 07/2012
**from 08/1992 to 07/2002
***from 08/2002 to 07/2012
18
Supplementary Table 2. Differences in trends before and after renaming
Period before renaming* Period after renaming**Difference in trend
between two periods
Variables r R2 SD p value r R2 SD P value Z score p value
Total 0.31 0.09 3.24 0.39 -0.2 0.04 2.75 0.589 0.96 0.337
Category
Negative 0.21 0.04 19.09 0.56 -0.49 0.24 8.2 0.153 1.4 0.162
Positive 0.44 0.19 1.31 0.204 -0.12 0.01 2.3 0.744 1.1 0.269
Negative subcategory
Danger 0.54 0.3 14.69 0.104 -0.69 0.47 15.83 0.028 2.72 0.007†
Suicide and self-injury 0.32 0.1 0.74 0.362 0.47 0.22 2.48 0.173 -0.32 0.749
Criminal victimisation and severe
mistreatment-0.48 0.23 4.41 0.162 0.54 0.29 7.05 0.108 -2.1 0.036
Strange, inept, or burdensome 0.7 0.49 2.65 0.025 0.17 0.03 2.57 0.636 1.29 0.197
Positive subcategory
Explaining schizophrenia/bipolar disorder 0.39 0.15 1.28 0.268 0.1 0.01 1.98 0.789 0.58 0.559
Health service inadequacies and
improvement0.19 0.04 2.79 0.592 0.13 0.02 8.74 0.718 0.12 0.904
Stigma, discrimination, and public
education0.33 0.11 1.52 0.357 -0.34 0.12 2.98 0.33 1.31 0.192
Renaming 0.53 0.28 10.63 0.114 -0.68 0.46 2.9 0.032 2.65 0.008
*from 08/1992 to 07/2002
**from 08/2002 to 07/2012
19