Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supplementary Material
Micro-Nanoporous MoO2@CoMo Heterostructure Catalyst
for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
Gyeong Ho Han1, Hyunki Kim1, Jooyoung Kim1, Junhyeong Kim1, Soo Young Kim2,**,
Sang Hyun Ahn1,*
1School of Chemical Engineering and Material Science, Chung-Ang University,
84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
2Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea University,
145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +82-2-820-5287; fax: +82-2-824-3495; e-mail: [email protected]
**Corresponding author. Tel.: +82-2-3290-3273; fax: +82-2-928-3584; e-mail: [email protected]
1
Table S1. Peak area ratios of deconvoluted Co 2p and Mo 3d XPS spectra for E-CoMo#/CP.
CatalystCo 2p Mo 3d
Co0 Co2+ Co3+ Co2+ sat. Mo0 Mo2+ Mo4+ Mo6+
E-CoMo300/CP 0.374 0.165 0.386 0.075 0.176 0.237 0.308 0.279
E-CoMo600/CP 0.359 0.236 0.266 0.139 0.161 0.207 0.316 0.316
E-CoMo900/CP 0.262 0.116 0.547 0.025 0.199 0.216 0.328 0.257
E-CoMo1200/CP 0.205 0.154 0.415 0.226 0.142 0.247 0.315 0.296
E-CoMo1800/CP 0.179 0.040 0.4758 0.306 0.071 0.278 0.336 0.315
Table S2. Comparison of electrochemical properties with the Mo-based heterostructure catalysts
reported in recent literature.
CatalystOverpotential
at −50 mA/cm2geo
(mV)
Tafel slope(mV/dec)
Double layercapacitance(mF/cm2
geo)Electrolyte Reference
MoO2-Ni NWs 150 36.6 29.6 1 M KOH 42
MoNi4 30 30 2220 1 M KOH 43
MoS2/MoO2 262 35.6 0.038 0.5 M H2SO4 44
Co/Ni-MoO2 160 80 7.7 1 M KOH 45
MoSe2/MoO2/Mo 185 48.9 88.09 0.5 M H2SO4 46
MoSe2/MoO2 200 (η20) 49.1 0.019 0.5 M H2SO4 47
MoO2/α-Mo2C120190
5065 70.49 1 M KOH
0.5 M H2SO448
Pt Cs/MoO2 NSs-L 120 32.6 26.7 0.5 M H2SO4 49
E-CoMo900/CP 76 50.88 287.8 0.5 M H2SO4 This study
2
Table S3. Comparison of HER overpotential for state-of-the-art catalysts reported in recent literature.
CatalystOverpotential
at −50 mA/cm2geo
(mV)Electrolyte Reference
Rh2-P 55 0.5 M H2SO4 S1
porous NiMo 70 0.5 M H2SO4 S2
Ru@Co-SAs/N-C 103 0.5 M H2SO4 S3
Ni5P4 MP 80 0.5 M H2SO4 S4
NFP/C-3 118 0.5 M H2SO4 S5
MoP/CNT-700 124 0.5 M H2SO4 S6
o-CoSe2IP 156 0.5 M H2SO4 S7
porous NiMo 75 0.5 M H2SO4 S8
Co2P@NPC-800 155 0.5 M H2SO4 S9
3.4 at% S-MoP 130 0.5 M H2SO4 S10
E-CoMo900/CP 76 0.5 M H2SO4 This study
Table S4. Peak area ratios of deconvoluted Co 2p and Mo 3d XPS spectra for E-CoMo#/CP after the
chronoamperometry at ‒0.11 VNHE for 1800 s.
3
CatalystCo 2p Mo 3d
Co0 Co2+ Co3+ Co2+ sat. Mo0 Mo2+ Mo4+ Mo6+
E-CoMo300/CP 0.248 0.234 0.502 0.016 0.196 0.248 0.310 0.246
E-CoMo600/CP 0.392 0.176 0.279 0.153 0.279 0.285 0.293 0.143
E-CoMo900/CP 0.268 0.060 0.619 0.052 0.171 0.197 0.273 0.359
E-CoMo1200/CP 0.342 0.114 0.504 0.040 0.200 0.315 0.256 0.229
E-CoMo1800/CP 0.233 0.06 0.495 0.212 0.103 0.306 0.235 0.356
Table S5. Peak area ratios of deconvoluted Co 2p and Mo 3d XPS spectra for E-CoMo900/CP after
the chronoamperometry at ‒0.11 VNHE for 10, 100, 300, 600, 1200, and 1800 s.
TimeCo 2p Mo 3d
Co0 Co2+ Co3+ Co2+ sat. Mo0 Mo2+ Mo4+ Mo6+
10 s 0.429 0.147 0.289 0.135 0.186 0.232 0.335 0.247
100 s 0.428 0.234 0.212 0.126 0.186 0.249 0.305 0.260
300 s 0.373 0.285 0.245 0.097 0.215 0.251 0.279 0.255
600 s 0.385 0.264 0.242 0.109 0.204 0.239 0.280 0.277
1200 s 0.365 0.271 0.226 0.138 0.163 0.259 0.276 0.302
1800 s 0.280 0.170 0.318 0.232 0.171 0.197 0.273 0.359
Table S6. Peak area ratios of deconvoluted Co 2p and Mo 3d XPS spectra for E-CoMo900/CP after
the chronoamperometry at ‒0.31 VNHE for 10, 100, 300, 600, 1200, and 1800 s.
TimeCo 2p Mo 3d
Co0 Co2+ Co3+ Co2+ sat. Mo0 Mo2+ Mo4+ Mo6+
10 s 0.318 0.111 0.489 0.082 0.175 0.202 0.328 0.295
100 s 0.312 0.164 0.379 0.145 0.178 0.229 0.314 0.279
300 s 0.266 0.185 0.397 0.152 0.162 0.253 0.283 0.302
600 s 0.281 0.235 0.315 0.169 0.148 0.264 0.277 0.311
1200 s 0.256 0.203 0.344 0.197 0.143 0.266 0.275 0.316
1800 s 0.284 0.247 0.371 0.098 0.205 0.214 0.273 0.308
4
-0.32 -0.30 -0.28 -0.26 -0.24 -0.22
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
Cur
rent
/ m
A
Potential / V vs. SCE
-0.270 V
Fig. S1. Calibration of the reference electrode. CV curve of Pt wire in the H2-purged 0.5 M H2SO4
electrolyte at a scan rate of 1 mV/s.
Fig. S2. LSV curve of CP substrate in the N2-purged deposition electrolyte at a scan rate of 5 mV/s.
5
50 µm 5 µm
50 µm 5 µm
50 µm 5 µm
50 µm 5 µm
50 µm 5 µm
50 µm 5 µm
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Co:Mo = 0.80:0.20
Co:Mo = 0.80:0.20
Co:Mo = 0.82:0.18
Co:Mo = 0.83:0.17
Co:Mo = 0.83:0.17
Fig. S3. FESEM images and EDS spectra of (a) bare CP and CoMo electrodeposited at a potential of
(b) ‒1.2 VSCE, (c) ‒1.4 VSCE, (d) ‒1.6 VSCE, (e) ‒1.8 VSCE, and (f) ‒2.0 VSCE. The deposition time was
fixed at 600 s. Insets: FESEM images at a higher magnification.
6
-0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30 -1.6 VSCE, 600 s -1.8 VSCE, 600 s -2.0 VSCE, 600 s
Bare CP -1.2 VSCE, 600 s -1.4 VSCE, 600 s
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Potential (iR-corrected) / V vs. RHE
-1.2 -1.4 -1.6 -1.8 -2.00
1
2
3
4
5
6
Bul
k C
o/M
o at
omic
rat
io
Deposition potential / V vs. SCE
(a)
(b)
Fig. S4. (a) Bulk Co/Mo atomic ratio of CoMo deposits as a function of deposition potential. (b) LSV
curves of bare CP and CoMo deposits in N2-purged 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte at a scan rate of 5 mV/s.
7
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Fig. S5. EDS spectra of (a) CoMo300/CP, (b) CoMo600/CP, (c) CoMo900/CP, (d) CoMo1200/CP, (e)
CoMo1800/CP, (f) E-CoMo300/CP, (g) E-CoMo600/CP, (h) E-CoMo900/CP, (i) E-CoMo1200/CP,
and (j) E-CoMo1800/CP.
8
0.08 VNHE, MoO3 + 6H+ + 6e- ↔ Mo + 3H2O
-0.15 VNHE, MoO2 + 4H+ + 4e- ↔ Mo + 4H2O
-0.20 VNHE, Mo3+ + 3e- ↔ Mo
-1.05 VNHE, MoO42- + 4H2O + 6e- ↔ Mo + 8OH-
-1.76 VNHE (deposition potential, -2.00 VSCE)
0.04 VNHE (etching potential, -0.20 VSCE)
0 VNHE, 2H+ + 2e- ↔ H2
-0.11 VNHE (HER low overpotential, -0.35 VSCE)
-0.28 VNHE, Co2+ + 2e- ↔ Co
-0.31 VNHE (HER high overpotential, -0.55 VSCE)
Potential / V vs. NHE
Fig. S6. Scale of various applied potentials and potentials of electrochemical reactions.
9
0.213 nmCoO(200)
0.205 nmCo0(111)
0.213 nmCoO(200)
0.205 nmCo0(111)
I
0.205 nmCo0(111)
0.158 nmMo0(200)
0.158 nmMo0(200)
0.158 nmMo0(200)
II III0.205 nmCo0(111)
I II III0.213 nmCoO(200)
0.158 nmMo0(200)
Fig. S7. HRTEM images and FFT patterns of CoMo900/CP.
Co0.86Mo0.10O0.04
Co0.72Mo0.13O0.15
Co0.84Mo0.11O0.05
(c)
(a)
(b)
100 nm
100 nm
100 nm
Fig. S8. EDS spectra of CoMo900/CP at the (a) surface, (b) interior, and (c) projected area.
10
0.192 nmMoO2(201)
0.205 nmCo0(111)
0.205 nmCo0(111)
0.192 nmMoO2(201)
0.223 nmMo0(110)
I 0.168 nmMoO2(220)
I
II
II
III
0.223 nmMo0(110)
0.192 nmMoO2(201)
III
0.233 nmMoO2(111)
0.233 nmMoO2(111)
0.233 nmMoO2(111)
0.336 nmMoO2(110)
0.168 nmMoO2(220)
0.233 nmMoO2(111) 0.192 nm
MoO2(201)
0.238 nmMoO2(200)
Fig. S9. HRTEM images and FFT patterns of E-CoMo900/CP.
Co0.66Mo0.16O0.18
Co0.41Mo0.20O0.39
Co0.69Mo0.19O0.12
100 nm
100 nm
(c)
(a)
(b)
100 nm
Fig. S10. EDS spectra of E-CoMo900/CP at the (a) surface, (b) interior, and (c) projected area.
11
240 238 236 234 232 230 228 226 224
Inte
nsity
/ a.
u.
Binding energy / eV800 795 790 785 780 775
Inte
nsity
/ a.
u.
Binding energy / eV
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
E-CoMo300/CP
E-CoMo600/CP
E-CoMo900/CP
E-CoMo1200/CP
E-CoMo1800/CP
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
E-CoMo300/CP
E-CoMo600/CP
E-CoMo900/CP
E-CoMo1200/CP
E-CoMo1800/CP
(b)(a)
Fig. S11. (a) Co 2p and (b) Mo 3d XPS spectra of E-CoMo#/CP.
1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
E-CoMo300/CP E-CoMo600/CP E-CoMo900/CP E-CoMo1200/CP E-CoMo1800/CP
Pote
ntia
l (iR
-cor
rect
ed) /
V v
s. R
HE
log (-j / mA cm-2geo)
(a) (b)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
E-CoMo300/CP E-CoMo600/CP E-CoMo900/CP E-CoMo1200/CP E-CoMo1800/CP
Z''
/
Z' /
11.7 Ω
6.8 Ω
20.3 Ω
6.0 Ω4.6 Ω
Fig. S12. (a) Tafel plots of the data in Fig. 6a. (b) Nyquist plots for E-CoMo#/CP measured at a
potential of –0.13 VRHE in N2-purged 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte.
12
-0.11 -0.10 -0.09 -0.08 -0.07 -0.06 -0.05-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Potential / V vs. SCE
-0.15 -0.14 -0.13 -0.12 -0.11 -0.10
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Potential / V vs. SCE-0.21 -0.20 -0.19 -0.18 -0.17 -0.16
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Potential / V vs. SCE
-0.28 -0.27 -0.26 -0.25 -0.24 -0.23 -0.22-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Potential / V vs. SCE-0.29 -0.28 -0.27 -0.26 -0.25 -0.24
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Potential / V vs. SCE
0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.52 0.53 0.54
-0.00008
-0.00004
0.00000
0.00004
0.00008
0.00012 5 mV/s 6 mV/s 7 mV/s
C
urre
nt d
ensi
ty /
mA
cm
-2 geo
Potential / V vs. SCE
1 mV/s 2 mV/s 3 mV/s 4 mV/s
(a) (b)
(e) (f)
(d)(c)
Fig. S13. Repeated CV curves of (a) bare CP, (b) E-CoMo300/CP, (c) E-CoMo600/CP, (d) E-
CoMo900/CP, (e) E-CoMo1200/CP, and (f) E-CoMo1800/CP at various scan rates in N2-purged 0.5 M
H2SO4 electrolyte.
13
240 238 236 234 232 230 228 226 224
Inte
nsity
/ a.
u.
Binding energy / eV800 795 790 785 780 775
Inte
nsity
/ a.
u.
Binding energy / eV
E-CoMo300/CP
E-CoMo600/CP
E-CoMo900/CP
E-CoMo1200/CP
E-CoMo1800/CP
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
E-CoMo300/CP
E-CoMo600/CP
E-CoMo900/CP
E-CoMo1200/CP
E-CoMo1800/CP
(b)(a)
Fig. S14. (a) Co 2p and (b) Mo 3d XPS spectra of E-CoMo#/CP after chronoamperometry at –0.11
VNHE for 1800 s.
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-30-28-26-24-22-20-18-16-14-12-10-8-6-4-20
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Time / s
E-CoMo300/CP E-CoMo600/CP E-CoMo900/CP E-CoMo1200/CP E-CoMo1800/CP
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-30-28-26-24-22-20-18-16-14-12-10-8-6-4-20
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Time / s
E-CoMo300/CP E-CoMo600/CP E-CoMo900/CP E-CoMo1200/CP E-CoMo1800/CP
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-30-28-26-24-22-20-18-16-14-12-10-8-6-4-20
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Time / s
E-CoMo300/CP E-CoMo600/CP E-CoMo900/CP E-CoMo1200/CP E-CoMo1800/CP
(a) (b) (c)
Fig. S15. Chronoamperometry of E-CoMo#/CP at –0.11 VNHE for 1800 s in the (a) 1st, (b) 2nd, and (c)
3rd test.
14
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Loa
ding
mas
s / m
g cat c
m-2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
Mas
s act
ivity
/ m
A m
g-1 cat
(a) (b)
Fig. S16. (a) Catalyst loading mass of E-CoMo#/CP. (b) Mass activity calculated from the
chronoamperometry at -0.11 VNHE (Fig. 6d).
-0.15 -0.12 -0.09 -0.06 -0.03 0.00 0.03-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Potential (iR-corrected) / V vs. RHE
E-CoMo300/CP E-CoMo600/CP E-CoMo900/CP E-CoMo1200/CP E-CoMo1800/CP
-0.15 -0.12 -0.09 -0.06 -0.03 0.00 0.03-7.5
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
E-CoMo300/CP E-CoMo600/CP E-CoMo900/CP E-CoMo1200/CP E-CoMo1800/CP
Mas
s act
ivity
/ m
A m
g cat-1
Potential (iR-corrected) / V vs. RHE
-0.15 -0.12 -0.09 -0.06 -0.03 0.00 0.03-0.10
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
E-CoMo300/CP E-CoMo600/CP E-CoMo900/CP E-CoMo1200/CP E-CoMo1800/CP
Scal
ed c
urre
nt /
mA
mF-1
Potential (iR-corrected) / V vs. RHE
(a) (b)
(c)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Ove
rpot
entia
l (iR
-cor
rect
ed) /
mV At -50 mA/cm2
geo
At -0.10 mA/mF1
At -7.5 mA/mgcat
(d)
Fig. S17. Potentiodynamic curves based on the (a) geometric current density, (b) scaled current, and
(c) mass activity. (d) Summary on the HER overpotential of E-CoMo#/CP.
15
-0.06 VNHE, 270 ~ 300 s -0.06 VNHE, 1770 ~ 1800 s
-0.11 VNHE, 270 ~ 300 s -0.11 VNHE, 1770 ~ 1800 s
-0.16 VNHE, 270 ~ 300 s -0.16 VNHE, 1770 ~ 1800 s
-0.21 VNHE, 270 ~ 300 s -0.21 VNHE, 1770 ~ 1800 s
-0.26 VNHE, 270 ~ 300 s -0.26 VNHE, 1770 ~ 1800 s
-0.31 VNHE, 270 ~ 300 s -0.31 VNHE, 1770 ~ 1800 s
H2 FE : 35.0 ±1.2% H2 FE : 98.2 ±0.8%
H2 FE : 33.7 ±1.5% H2 FE : 102.5 ±1.7%
H2 FE : 37.8 ±0.5% H2 FE : 102.8 ±0.3%
H2 FE : 41.1 ±2.3% H2 FE : 104.3 ±0.1%
H2 FE : 43.5 ±3.7% H2 FE : 104.2 ±0.7%
H2 FE : 42.2 ±0.7% H2 FE : 103.3 ±1.6%
(a)
(c)
(e)
(g)
(i)
(k)
(b)
(d)
(f)
(h)
(j)
(l)
Fig. S18. Gas chromatography analysis of E-CoMo900/CP depending on the applied potential and
measuring time.
16
800 795 790 785 780 775
Inte
nsity
/ a.
u.
Binding energy / eV
10 s
100 s
300 s
600 s
1200 s
1800 s
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
240 238 236 234 232 230 228 226 224
Inte
nsity
/ a.
u.
Binding energy / eV
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
(b)(a)10 s
100 s
300 s
600 s
1200 s
1800 s
Fig. S19. (a) Co 2p and (b) Mo 3d XPS spectra of E-CoMo900/CP after chronoamperometry at –0.11
VNHE for 10, 100, 300, 600, 1200, and 1800 s.
17
800 795 790 785 780 775
Inte
nsity
/ a.u
.
Binding energy / eV
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
5000 cps
240 238 236 234 232 230 228 226 224
Inte
ntis
y / a
.u.
Binding energy / eV
(b)(a)10 s
100 s
300 s
600 s
1200 s
1800 s
10 s
100 s
300 s
600 s
1200 s
1800 s
Fig. S20. (a) Co 2p and (b) Mo 3d XPS spectra of E-CoMo900/CP after chronoamperometry at –0.31
VNHE for 10, 100, 300, 600, 1200, and 1800 s.
18
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.50.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Z
'' /
Z' /
Rsol = 2.29 Ω
Fig. S21. Nyquist plots for E-CoMo900/CP measured at H-type cell at a potential of –0.13 VRHE in N2-purged 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte.
-0.20 -0.16 -0.12 -0.08 -0.04 0.00-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
Cur
rent
den
sity
/ m
A c
m-2 ge
o
Potential (iR-corrected) / V vs. RHE
Before stability test After stability test
9.8 mV
Fig. S22. LSV curves of E-CoMo900/CP before and after long-term stability test in H-type cell containing N2-purged 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte.
19
(a)
(b)
End plate
Bipolar plate
Membrane
Catalyst
Gasket
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
E-CoMo900/CP IrO2/CP
Cel
l vol
tage
/ V
cell
Current density / A cm-2geo
(c)
Fig. S23. Photographs of (a) parts in the PEMWE single cell configuration and (b) the assembled
single cell. (c) Polarization curve of PEMWE single cell employing E-CoMo900/CP cathode and
IrO2/CP anode.
References
20
[S1] F. Yang, Y. Zhao, Y. Du, Y. Chen, G. Cheng, S. Chen, W. Luo, A Monodisperse Rh2P-Based Electrocatalyst for Highly Efficient and pH-Universal Hydrogen Evolution Reaction, Adv. Energy Mat., 8 (2018) 1703489.
[S2] Y. Ito, T. Ohto, D. Hojo, M. Wakisaka, Y. Nagata, L. Chen, K. Hu, M. Izumi, J.-i. Fujita, T. Adschiri, Cooperation between holey graphene and NiMo alloy for hydrogen evolution in an acidic electrolyte, ACS Catal.., 8 (2018) 3579-3586.
[S3] S. Yuan, Z.H. Pu, H. Zhou, J. Yu, I.S. Amiinu, J.W. Zhu, Q.R. Liang, J.L. Yang, D.P. He, Z.Y. Hu, G.V. Tendeloo, S.C. Mu, A universal synthesis strategy for single atom dispersed cobalt/netal clusters heterostructure boositing gydrogen evolution catalysis at all pH values, Nano Energy, 59 (2019) 472-480.
[S4] A.B. Laursen, R.B. Wexler, M.J. Whitaker, E. J. Izett, K. U. D. Calvinho, S. Hwang, R. Rucker, H. Wang, J. Li, E.Garfunkel, M. Greenblatt, A. M. Rappe, G. C. Dismukes, Climbing the Volcano of Electrocatalytic Activity while Avoiding Catalyst Corrosion: Ni3P, a Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalyst Stable in Both Acid and Alkali, ACS Catal., 8, (2018) 4408-4419.
[S5] X.F. Lu, L. Yu, X.W.(David) Lou, Highly crystalline Ni-doped FeP/carbon hollow nanorods as all-pH efficient and durable hydrogen evolving electrocatalysts, Sci. Adv., 5 (2019) 6009-6017.
[S6] X. Zhang, X. Yu, L. Zhang, F. Zhou, Y. Liang and R. Wang, Molybdenum phosphide/carbon nanotube hybrids as pH-universal electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction, Adv. Funct. Mater., 28 (2018) 1706523.
[S7] Y.-R. Zheng, P. Wu, M.-R. Gao, X.-L. Zhang, F.-Y. Gao, H.-X. Ju, R. Wu, Q. Gao, R. You, W.- X. Huang, S.-J. Liu, S.-W. Hu, J. Zhu, Z. Li, S.-H. Yu, Doping-induced structural phase transition in cobalt diselenide enables enhanced hydrogen evolution catalysis, Nat. Commun., 9 (2018) 2533.
[S8] Y. Ito, T. Ohto, D. Hojo, M. Wakisaka, Y. Nagata, L. Chen, K. Hu, M. Izumi, J. I. Fujita, T. Adschiri, Cooperation between holey graphene and NiMo alloy for hydrogen evolution in an acidic electrolyte, ACS Catal., 8, 4, (2018) 3579-3586
[S9] C. Zhang, Z. Pu, I. S. Amiinu, Y. Zhao, J. Zhu, Y. Tang, S. Mu, Co2P Quantum Dot Embedded N, P Dual-doped Carbon Self-supported Electrodes with Flexible and Binder-free Properties for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction, Nanoscale, 10, (2018) 2902-2907.
[S10]K. Liang, S. Pakhira, Z. Yang, A. Nijiamudheen, L. Ju, M. Wang, C. I. A. Velez, G. E. Sterbinsky, Y. Du, Z. Feng, J. L. M. Cortes, Y. Yang, S-Doped Nanoporous Layer Towards High-Efficiency Hydrogen Evolution in pH-Universal Electrolyte, ACS Catal., 9, 1, (2019) 651-659.
21