16
ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info Pat Burns, Interim Dean 2/5/2009 1 ARL Briefing #4.a

ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

  • Upload
    taber

  • View
    24

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info. Pat Burns, Interim Dean. Outline. ARL Types of Analyses CSU Peer Institutions’ Profiles Analyses using ARL data Collections & Service Expenditures Summary tables below in this Briefing 4.a Detailed graphs in Briefing 4.b. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.aSummary Info Pat Burns, Interim Dean

2/5/2009

1

ARL Briefing #4.a

Page 2: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

Outline

•ARL•Types of Analyses•CSU Peer Institutions’ Profiles•Analyses using ARL data

▫Collections & Service▫Expenditures

•Summary tables below in this Briefing 4.a•Detailed graphs in Briefing 4.b

2/5/2009

2

ARL Briefing #4.a

Page 3: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

Abbreviations & Definitions

•FTE – Full time equivalent•Lib – Library •Students – total student FTE, grad +

undergrad •TT – Tenure track

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

3

Page 4: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

ARL

•Member organization of about 110 premier research libraries

•Over 100 years old•Maintains a robust and consistent

longitudinal database of Library data•Research libraries have a relatively

unique mission for collections and preservation

2/5/2009

4

ARL Briefing #4.a

Page 5: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

ARL Data

•Are annual•Are sometimes missing – shows as zero•Are not as ‘clean’ as one would like

▫But, overall, are very good and very consistent

•All ‘people’ are defined in terms of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE), not ‘heads’

•Normalization is per FTE Tenure Track Faculty

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

5

Page 6: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

Types of Analyses•Who – our peer institutions (from Fact Book)•What

▫Institutional profiles▫Library: collections, expenditures

•How▫Absolute – how does our Library compare with

other research libraries in an absolute sense▫Normalized– how does our Library compare

with other research libraries in a relative sense•Why – to inform decision making

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

6

Page 7: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

7

Page 8: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

Peers: ARL Rank in 2007 (Latest)• CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 64• COLORADO 70• COLORADO STATE 103• ILLINOIS, URBANA 13• IOWA STATE 81• MICHIGAN STATE 40

• N. CAROLINA STATE 41• OHIO STATE 27• OKLAHOMA STATE 89• PURDUE 46• TEXAS A&M 26• WASHINGTON STATE 99

2/5/2009

8

ARL Briefing #4.a

Page 9: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

Institutional Profiles

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

9

  CSU RankInstitutional Data Absolute NormalizedTotal FTE TT Faculty 12 -PHD Fields 11 3PHDs Awarded 10 8FTE Grad Students 11 8FTE Total Students 11 12

Total Budget 11 7

Page 10: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

10

Page 11: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

11

Page 12: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

Collections

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

12

  CSU RankCollections Absolute NormalizedVolumes 12 5Serials 12 6ILL Lends 3 1ILL Borrows 3 1Queries 6 4

Page 13: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

13

Page 14: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

14

Page 15: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

15

Rank = 6th

Page 16: ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info

Library Expenditures

2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a

16

  CSU RankLib. Expenditures Absolute NormalizedBooks 11 3Serials 12 5Total Materials 12 4Lib. Faculty Salaries 12 5Lib. Staff Salaries 12 8Lib. Student Salaries 9 5Lib. Total Salaries 12 6Total Lib. Expenses 12 4