Upload
taber
View
24
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info. Pat Burns, Interim Dean. Outline. ARL Types of Analyses CSU Peer Institutions’ Profiles Analyses using ARL data Collections & Service Expenditures Summary tables below in this Briefing 4.a Detailed graphs in Briefing 4.b. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.aSummary Info Pat Burns, Interim Dean
2/5/2009
1
ARL Briefing #4.a
Outline
•ARL•Types of Analyses•CSU Peer Institutions’ Profiles•Analyses using ARL data
▫Collections & Service▫Expenditures
•Summary tables below in this Briefing 4.a•Detailed graphs in Briefing 4.b
2/5/2009
2
ARL Briefing #4.a
Abbreviations & Definitions
•FTE – Full time equivalent•Lib – Library •Students – total student FTE, grad +
undergrad •TT – Tenure track
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
3
ARL
•Member organization of about 110 premier research libraries
•Over 100 years old•Maintains a robust and consistent
longitudinal database of Library data•Research libraries have a relatively
unique mission for collections and preservation
2/5/2009
4
ARL Briefing #4.a
ARL Data
•Are annual•Are sometimes missing – shows as zero•Are not as ‘clean’ as one would like
▫But, overall, are very good and very consistent
•All ‘people’ are defined in terms of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE), not ‘heads’
•Normalization is per FTE Tenure Track Faculty
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
5
Types of Analyses•Who – our peer institutions (from Fact Book)•What
▫Institutional profiles▫Library: collections, expenditures
•How▫Absolute – how does our Library compare with
other research libraries in an absolute sense▫Normalized– how does our Library compare
with other research libraries in a relative sense•Why – to inform decision making
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
6
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
7
Peers: ARL Rank in 2007 (Latest)• CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 64• COLORADO 70• COLORADO STATE 103• ILLINOIS, URBANA 13• IOWA STATE 81• MICHIGAN STATE 40
• N. CAROLINA STATE 41• OHIO STATE 27• OKLAHOMA STATE 89• PURDUE 46• TEXAS A&M 26• WASHINGTON STATE 99
2/5/2009
8
ARL Briefing #4.a
Institutional Profiles
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
9
CSU RankInstitutional Data Absolute NormalizedTotal FTE TT Faculty 12 -PHD Fields 11 3PHDs Awarded 10 8FTE Grad Students 11 8FTE Total Students 11 12
Total Budget 11 7
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
10
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
11
Collections
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
12
CSU RankCollections Absolute NormalizedVolumes 12 5Serials 12 6ILL Lends 3 1ILL Borrows 3 1Queries 6 4
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
13
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
14
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
15
Rank = 6th
Library Expenditures
2/5/2009ARL Briefing #4.a
16
CSU RankLib. Expenditures Absolute NormalizedBooks 11 3Serials 12 5Total Materials 12 4Lib. Faculty Salaries 12 5Lib. Staff Salaries 12 8Lib. Student Salaries 9 5Lib. Total Salaries 12 6Total Lib. Expenses 12 4