Upload
vuongtu
View
220
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Are Two Drives Better than One? Lenny Sharp Director, Client HDD Marketing HGST
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 2 HGST Confidential
Form Factors Driving Proliferation of Storage Options
Must balance FF, Performance & Cost
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 3 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Mobile Storage Options (2H 2013)
mSATA M.2 5mm 2.5” 7mm 2.5” 9.5mm 2.5”
Cache SSD 8-32GB 8-32GB
SSD 128-512GB 128-512GB 128-960GB
SSHD 500GB 500GB – 1TB 750GB – 1TB
HDD 320-500GB 250GB – 1TB 500GB – 1.5TB
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 5 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Capacity Forecasted to Remain Relevant
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
<=3TB
2TB
1.5TB
1TB
750GB
640GB
500GB
320GB
<=250GB
IDC March 2013
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 6 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Notebook Storage – Performance Options
SSD
HDD & NVM
HDD
HDD + SSD Cache
SSHD
Very high cost Various form factor options Best performance
Limited to the premium notebook segment only
Meets Intel’s Ultrabook specification
Does not meet Intel’s Ultrabook specification, but can deliver cost effective ‘Thin & Light’ experience or higher capacity
Sourcing and configuration flexibility across HDD and SSD Cache
Chipset and software solutions available to seamlessly integrate the two drives
Initial implementations did not deliver on form-factor and price/performance
Improved generation of drives just launched
Best cost Proven product reliability and suppliers 7mm thin option
Clear choice for mainstream and entry-level notebooks
Several drive options are available to improve the system experience, including boot, application start-up, resume from sleep and battery life
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 7 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Cost of Mobile Storage Options
1.17
0.86
0.78
0.16 0.12 0.12 0.14
0.08
-
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
128GB SSD 256GB SSD 512GB SSD 500GB SSHD 1TB SSHD 500GB 5400 HDD
500GB 7200 HDD
1TB 5400 HDD
$/GB
Source: newegg.com August 12, 2013
HDD Based Options offer superior GB/$ value
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 8 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Hybrid Storage Solutions SSHD vs. Dual Drive
Mobile SSHD Mobile
Dual Drive: HDD + SSD
Advantages Flexibility to mix and match “best of breed” HDD and
SSD for performance and capacity points Easy multi-sourcing of HDD and SSD SKU leverage (3x3=9) Caching software can leverage CPU resources and file
awareness to deliver better performance Potential performance benefit of Independent and
scalable interfaces
Advantages Less complexity leveraged qualification
Potential for cost savings of a more integrated solution
HDD form factor
No space required for mSATA in system
Can be used instead of HDD in any system
Common Advantages: Much higher performance than HDD alone, approaching SSD for certain applications, can meet Ultrabook spec;
Equivalent cost structure, BOM dominated by NAND, plus controller & interface
Caching Software SATA
SATA SATA
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 9 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
SSHD vs. Dual-drive Architecture
SSHD HDD NAND
SSD
Applications Applications
OS OS
Cache accelerator
DRAM DRAM
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 10 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
SSHD vs. Dual-drive Architecture
Pros: • Only one I/F port needed • No SW installation needed • Transparent upgrade to the system
Cons: • Cache management shares embedded CPU • Requires dedicated DRAM: For running
filtering and classification algorithms and maintaining frequency tables
• Page faults may still incur ~10 ms latencies • Increased firmware complexity:
– More complex reliability validation and data integrity verification
• Makes it hard for systems designers to optimize since it decreases control and adds a level of indirection
Pros: • Cache accelerator software has DRAM
access, sharing it with the rest of the systems • SSD may be used as: (1) a separate storage
tier, (2) as a 2-nd tier cache to DRAM, or (3) even both
• Cache accelerator runs on x86 CPU and can implement compression & de-duplication
• Accelerator has more application and OS semantics to maneuver: choice of write back/write-through and can also keep all data on primary storage (HDD)
• More flexibility in choice of algorithms and settings
Cons: • Requires software installation • Requires one additional I/F port
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 11 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Hybrid Storage Solutions SSHD vs. Dual Drive
Mobile SSHD Mobile
Dual Drive: HDD + SSD
Caching Software SATA
SATA SATA
WD
Seagate Toshiba
3 options, 3 distinct architectures Choice of standard components
5400 RPM HDD
7200 RPM HDD
250GB-1.5TB
5,7 or 9.5mm
8, 16, 24 or 32 GB cache
mSATA, mSATA mini or M.2
Intel or 3rd party SW driver
Limited number of capacity and form factor options
Limited cache size options 5400 RPM only
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 12 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
PC Mark Vantage 64 HDD Test
Ultrabook spec
Core i5 Ultrabook, Win7
7200 RPM performance advantage in dual drive configurations
Dual drive can outperform single SSD
Dual drive maintains performance advantage over hybrid
2 > 1
Source: HGST Test Results
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
Z5K500 HDD Z7K500 HDD Z5K500 HDD+32GB SSD+Intel
iSRT
Z7K500 HDD+32GB SSD+Intel
iSRT
Z5K500 HDD+32GB
SSD+NVELO
Z7K500 HDD+32GB
SSD+NVELO
Plextor 256GB SSD
Seagate SSHD 500GB
Seagate SSHD
1000GB
Toshiba 750GB Hybrid
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 13 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
PC Mark 7 Storage Test
Dual Drive with 7200 RPM HDD Nearly as fast as SSD Up to 40% faster than SSHDs
Core i5 Ultrabook, Win7 Source: HGST Test Results
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Z5K500 HDD Z7K500 HDD Z5K500 HDD+32GB SSD+Intel
iSRT
Z7K500 HDD+32GB SSD+Intel
iSRT
Z5K500 HDD+32GB
SSD+NVELO
Z7K500 HDD+32GB
SSD+NVELO
Plextor 256GB SSD
Seagate SSHD 500GB
Seagate SSHD
1000GB
Toshiba 750GB Hybrid
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 14 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Windows 8 Restart
41.4
30.9 29.8
26.4
18.5
27.4
35.2
42.4
-
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
Z5K500 HDD Z5K500+16GB Z5K500+32GB 7K1000+16GB Plextor SSD Toshiba Hybrid Seagate 1TB SSHD
Seagate 500GB SSHD
Seconds
Core i5 Ultrabook, Win8 Pro Source: HGST Test Results
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 15 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
PC Mark Vantage 64 HDD Test
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Z5K500+8GB Z7K500+8GB Z5K500+16GB Z7K500+16GB Plextor SSD Seagate SSHD Toshiba Hybrid
Core i5 Ultrabook, Win8 Pro Source: HGST Test Results
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 16 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Z5K500+8GB Z7K500+8GB Z5K500+16GB Z7K500+16GB Plextor SSD Seagate SSHD Toshiba Hybrid
PC Mark 7 Storage Test
Core i5 Ultrabook, Win8 Pro Source: HGST Test Results
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 17 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Sysmark Application Benchmark
126.91 130.07 132.28
129.18 131.17 132.6 130.57
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Jaguar-B King 1.5TB (5400 RPM)
NO SSD
Jaguar-B King 1.5TB (5400 RPM)
32GB Cache*
Jaguar-B King 1.5TB (5400 RPM)
64GB Cache
Jaguar 1C 500GB (7200 RPM) NO
SSD
Jaguar 1C 500GB (7200 RPM) 32GB
Cache*
Jaguar 1C 500GB (7200 RPM) 64GB
Cache
Seagate SSHD 1TB
Overall Performance *
* Synthesis of Office productivity, Media creation, Web development Data/Financial analysis, 3D modeling & System management Source: HGST Test Results
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 18 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Sysmark Application Benchmark
126.91
130.07
132.28
129.18
131.17
132.6
130.57
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
Jaguar-B King 1.5TB (5400 RPM)
NO SSD
Jaguar-B King 1.5TB (5400 RPM)
32GB Cache*
Jaguar-B King 1.5TB (5400 RPM)
64GB Cache
Jaguar 1C 500GB (7200 RPM) NO
SSD
Jaguar 1C 500GB (7200 RPM) 32GB
Cache*
Jaguar 1C 500GB (7200 RPM) 64GB
Cache
Seagate SSHD 1TB
Overall Performance *
* Synthesis of Office productivity, Media creation, Web development Data/Financial analysis, 3D modeling & System management Source: HGST Test Results
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 19 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
The Question
Are two drives better than one?
…it depends
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 20 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Range of Mobile Storage Options
5400RPM HDD
7200RPM HDD
SSHD
5400RPM HDD + Cache SSD
7200RPM HDD + Cache SSD
SSD
Price
Per
form
ance
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 21 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
“Sweet Spot” Solution
Performance
Integration Cost
© 2013, HGST, a Western Digital company 22 Santa Clara, CA – August 2013
Forward Looking Statement
This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements concerning: growth opportunities in the various storage markets as well as the industry as a whole, including growth in units shipped, areal density and content stored; HGST’s position within the industry; the increasing diversity of storage demand; and the outlook for the storage industry, HGST and its customers. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including the impact of continued uncertainty and volatility in global economic conditions; supply and demand conditions in the hard drive industry; uncertainties concerning the availability and cost of commodity materials and specialized product components; actions by competitors; unexpected advances in competing technologies; uncertainties related to the development and introduction of products based on new technologies and expansion into new data storage markets; business conditions and growth in the various hard drive markets; pricing trends and fluctuations in average selling prices; and compliance with regulatory conditions imposed on us by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce. More information about the other risks and uncertainties that could affect our business are listed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, including our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 3, 2013, to which your attention is directed. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. We do not intend, and we undertake no duty, to update these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.