April 7, 2017 PUBLIC NOTICE (03-17) - NAVCEN · april 7, 2017 public notice (03-17) bridge permit application to replace the bridge pensacola bay, mile 0.0, at state road 30, u.s

April 7, 2017

PUBLIC NOTICE (03-17)

BRIDGE PERMIT APPLICATION TO REPLACE THE BRIDGE PENSACOLA BAY, MILE 0.0, AT STATE ROAD 30, U.S. HIGHWAY 98, IN PENSACOLA AND GULF BREEZE,

ESCAMBIA AND SANTA ROSA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

All interested parties are notified that an application from FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) has been received by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District, for approval of the enclosed plans to construct a bridge over a navigable waterway of the United States. WATERWAY AND LOCATION: Pensacola Bay, Mile 0.0 at State Road (SR) 30, U.S. Highway 98, in Pensacola and Gulf Breeze, Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties, Florida (hereinafter “Pensacola Bay Bridge”). CHARACTER OF WORK: FDOT proposes replace the existing fixed, vehicular traffic bridge across Pensacola Bay and remove the associated fender system. The existing bridge is a significant transportation corridor in the project region, and upon last inspection of the bridge, it was found to be functionally obsolete and structurally deficient. The importance of replacing the bridge is magnified given SR 30’s/US 98’s use as a hurricane evacuation route, and projects that the proposed bridge will handle the level of service necessary in year 2040. By constructing two parallel bridges, with three through lanes each, transit beneath the existing structure will be improved as will public safety for traffic using Pensacola Bay. The existing bridge will be removed. The existing fender system will be removed but not replaced given that a clear width of 342.5 feet between foundation elements will be available. Further, vertical clearance across the main channel will be improved with the bridge replacement. MINIMUM NAVIGATIONAL CLEARANCES: Existing: Proposed: Horizontal: 125.00 feet Horizontal: 342.5 feet between piers, normal to the axis of between piers, normal to the axis of the channel the channel Vertical: 50.0 feet above Mean High Water Vertical: 65.0 feet above MHW (NAVD 88) (MHW), MHW elevation 0.91 feet North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88)

Commander Eighth Coast Guard District Hale Boggs Federal Building

500 Poydras Street, Room 1313 New Orleans, LA 70130-3310 Staff Symbol: (dpb) Phone: (504) 671-2128 Fax: (504) 671-2133

2

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the applicant prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), and determined that the preferred project alternative would have no significant impact on the quality of the human environment. Thereafter, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), as lead federal agency, independently evaluated the project and adopted and signed the Finding of No Significant Impact on May 5, 2015. Pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 14, 2016, and executed by the Federal Highway Administration and FDOT, the environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried out by the FDOT. Many of the contents of this public notice have already been published in Public Notice 04-16 on June 24, 2016, as a design-build project. The project was reevaluated under NEPA, which prompted a new public notice review period of 15 days. A NEPA re-evaluation on the EA was competed by FDOT on April 5, 2017, and FDOT concluded that “there have been no changes to the project that affect the original environmental determination. Therefore, the Administrative Action remains valid.” Unless significant impacts are revealed by this public notification process to warrant the preparation of an environmental impact statement, tentatively, the United States Coast Guard will adopt, or adopt in part, the aforementioned EA and prepare a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the proposed project. Construction is in a floodplain with a 100-year flood elevation of 7.4 feet, North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). No parkland, recreational areas, or wildlife refuges are affected. The project does not have any effects on environmental justice. The applicant proposes to impact wetlands with construction of the bridge project. The applicant received a Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number 14 verification dated June 17, 2016, which was valid until March 18, 2017. The applicant will be required to update this verification prior to bridge permit issuance. The project is located in the Florida’s coastal zone. The applicant has been granted an Environmental Resource Permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) dated June 13, 2016, which constitutes a finding of consistency with Florida’s Coastal Zone Management Program, as required by Section 307 of the Coastal Zone Management Act and further constitutes water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties are in attainment status for 2016 for criteria pollutants. The permit applicant may be required to furnish a statement from Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Air Resource Management that the project meets the requirements of the State Implementation Plan on air quality. A Cultural Resources Assessment Report was prepared on behalf of the applicant in support of this project by Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc. (SEARCH or “contractor”). In a letter dated March 11, 2013, the applicant provided the letter of regarding the report to the Federal Highway Administration. The letter stated in part:

3

“No potential NRHP districts were identified due to the lack of concentration of historic structures. It is the opinion of the District that the proposed bridge replacement will have no effect on historic resources listed or eligible for listing in the NRHP and no further architectural history survey is recommended. … It is the opinion of the District that no terrestrial archaeological resources listed or eligible for listing in the NRHP will be affected by the proposed bridge replacement and no further archaeological survey is recommended for the terrestrial portion of the project APE [Area of Potential Effect].” Further, the applicant stated in the letter of March 2013, “[t]he maritime remote-sensing survey identified 12 targets that are recommended for additional archaeological investigations should any bottom impacts, including anchoring, spudding, or mooring of construction vessels, be proposed in their vicinity.” The letter of March 11, 2013, stated the proposed project will have no adverse effect on terrestrial archaeological or historical properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of archaeological, historical, or architectural value. The letter further requested concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) with the recommendation of the contractor, “that a 50-meter buffer is appropriate for consideration of the maritime targets, and that because they are located at least 50 meters beyond the project alternatives, no further work will be conducted on Targets M06, Ml 1, Ml2, M15, Ml8, Ml9, and M20 at this time.” In accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the findings were coordinated with the Florida Division of Historical Resources, State Historic Preservation Officer, who provided a stamp and signature indicating concurrence with the applicant’s findings on April 11, 2013. The Gulf sturgeon, smalltooth sawfish, West Indian manatee and sea turtles (loggerhead, green sea, leatherback, Kemp's ridley, hawksbill) are species that may be impacted by the proposed project. A Final Biological Opinion (BO) was provided by the USFWS and dated April 8, 2015. After changes were made to construction techniques, the USFWS reevaluated the project and issued an amended BO on January 23, 2017. To minimize adverse impacts to the protected species within the vicinity of the project area, FDOT will implement conservation measures and abide by commitments set forth in the terms and conditions therein: The applicant has completed Section 7 consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), which reviewed the project for Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) coordination. In a letter of March 23, 2017, NMFS indicated the following:

“Because all potential project effects to listed species and critical habitat were found to be discountable. insignificant, or beneficial, we conclude that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect listed species under NMFS’s purview. This concludes your consultation responsibilities under the ESA for species under NMFS’s purview. Consultation must be reinitiated if a take occurs or new information reveals effects of the action not previously considered, or if the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered, or if a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action. NMFS’s findings on the project’s potential

4

effects are based on the project description in this response. Any changes to the proposed action may negate the findings of this consultation and may require reinitiation of consultation with NMFS.”

SOLICITATION OF COMMENTS: Interested parties are requested to comment on the proposed bridge project, clearance gauges, the need for a bridge protective system, the extent of nighttime navigation on the waterway, the need for bridge lighting, and other navigational safety issues. Interested parties are also requested to express their views on the proposed bridge project’s possible environmental impacts, including impacts on minority and/or low income populations. Geri Robinson is the Bridge Management Specialist assigned to this proposed project. Comments will be received at the Eighth Coast Guard District, Bridge Administration Branch, at the address given in the letterhead through April 24, 2017. //s// DOUG BLAKEMORE Chief, Bridge Administration Branch By direction of the Commander Eighth Coast Guard District This is a web-searchable copy and it is not the official, signed version; however, other than the signature being omitted, it is a duplicate of the official version.

APPLICAIIIT:F LORI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRA\¡ISPORTAT I ON

CONSULTANT : PARSONS BRI NCKERHOFF

PENSACOLA BAY BRIDGE

PROPOSED BRIDGE M.P. O,O WATERWAYBEGIN PROJECT M.P. 3.425 SR 30

-.BETWEEN PENSÆOLA AIUD GULF BREEZE,ESCATTBIA & SANTA ROSA COIJNTIES, FLOR'IDA

VICINITY MAP

BRNÐGE COATSTRUCTNONPROJECT

SR 30 (US 98) OVER PENSACOLA BAY LOCATION

FINANCIAL PROJECT ID 409334-1-52-01FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO, 4221-O9T-C

ESCAMBIA 6r SANTA ROSA COUNTY UErcO & 58030)FDOT CONTRACT NO.83N51

Ioì

q

BEGIN BRIDGE #480289 & #480290

EXISTING FISHING PIER

END

T-2-Sr-r-5

ruol¡flE

NAVAL LIVEOAKS NATUREPERSERVE

sÞÊffi

F¡ERG

rlólrl

\rf.

20

M¡les

NOTES:

1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON NAVDf/8..LOC ON MAP

2. THE BRIDGE HAS BEEN DESIGNED FORSTATIC LATERAL SHIP IMPAC-T FORCES

33-41 6. 62-7042-44 & 59-6145-47 & 56-5848-49 & 54-55

50&535t&52

THE FOLLOW ING EQUIVALENTAPPLIED PER AASHTO LRFD.

PIER NO. TRANSVERSE (KIP) LONGITUDINAL (KIP)

6s018002200260028003350

32s900

1 100t3001400167 5

e{uæo

-tûtørg tila-P -'

-'

,

FEBRUARY 2017 SHEET I OF 10

IQ PIER (TYP.)

R/W LINESHORELINE

FIoPLAN

PROPOSED BRIDGE NO.480289

APPLICANT:F LORI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT I ON

CONSU LTANT : PARSONS BRI NCKERHOFF


PROPOSED BRIDGE M.P, O.O WATERWAYBEGIN PROJECT M.P. 3.425 SR 30

BETWEEN PENSACOLA N{D GULF BREEZE,ESCAIIBIA & SAIIíTA ROSA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

PROPOSED BRIDGE PLAN AND ELEVATION (1 OF J)

aaa :ÑoD¡rect¡on of Stat¡on¡ng I

* *0 120 600

FeetAPE BOUNDARY

R/W LINE oocirô+srô

t-!/)

\I-¡IUt-E

PENSACOLA .Òl3t\6lql

EXISTING BRIDGENO. 480035rO BE REMOVED

SHORELINE

BEGIN BRIDGEsTA. 1197+44.32

EXISTING FISHINGPIER TO REMAIN

ç cousT. sR 30PROPOSED BRIDGE NO,

480290

APE BOUNDARY

16,1 38.00' LENGTH OF BR]DGE - 30)aoc;uì+aulN

l-14

tuI{ÌoF.

Þ

100

80

60

40

20

0

-20

-40

BEGIN BRIDGESTA. 1 197+44.32

(4,918.9

PROPOSED PGL100

80

60

40

20

-20

-40

MAX. WAVE CRESTEL.17.40'

MLWEL. -0.3t

100-f EAREL.7.49 ç PIER ÏYP.) APPROX. EXIST,

GROUND LINEMHWEL. O.91'

ELEVATION

NOTES: LEGEND:

-g I

1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON NAVD88,2. TOTAL QUANTITY OF RIPRAP IS

'4,450 CUBIC YARD'.

- EXISTING ARIDGETO BE REMOVED

FEBRUARY 2017 SHEET 2 OF 10

qgwgøøøø7r7r, V#t#ryHßryßgm ,/.MWÆ/,ry/24Vff4øWøØØ. '/ø/M/Í/)

tú

aaa

APPLICANT:F LORI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT I ON


PROPOSED BRIDGE M.P. O.O WATERWAYBEGIN PROJECT M.P. 3.425 5R 30

BETWEEN PENSACOLA AAID GULF BREEZE,ESCA¡IBIA & SAAITA ROSA COUNTIES, FLORIDA


PROPOSED BRIDGE PLAìI AND ELEVATION (2 OF 3)

:Ñ

D¡tect¡on of Stationing

-0 120 600

FeetAPE BOUNDARY

oqotô+o!'t

l-Irlt¡¡

=JIUt-È

R/W LINE COUNTY LINEESCANBlA/'ANfA ROSA

(¡c\ûft+tîof¡

l-UI

a={Iot-

=

.ôl3[(6l6lql

ç CHANNEL(PENSACOLA BAY)

EXISTING BRIDGENO. 480035fO BE REMOVED

Q C1NST. SR 30PROPOSED BRID6E NO,

480290

\q

aoFE

(i

ÈIoo\ho

Q PIER (TYP.)R/W LINE

PROPOSED ARIDGE NO.480289

Y or, "orroo

, PLAN

t6 t3aot IOVFRAI I OF BRIDGE - MEASURED ALOHG covsr. sR160

,408¡zoqi

!r'!100 +o80R60*,,Stszohol-.zo ì-ooü

t-E

(4,918.9 M) 160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

o

-20

-40

PROPOSED PGL

oo\tfn+vìoñt

t-tla={IUt-È

MAX, WAVE CRESîE1.17.40

I

i-

IMLW

EL. -0.30' Q PIER (TYP.) APPROX, EXISTGROUND LINE

MHWEL. O.9I',

'OO-YEAREL,7,4O 342.50 CLR

ç CHANNEL)

Q CHANNEL

ELEVATION

NOTES: LEGEND:

1. ELEVATIONS SI1OWN ON fIIESE PLANS ARE BASED ON NAVD88.2. TOTAL QUANTITY OF RIPRAP IS 14.450 CUBIC YARDS.

- EXISTING BRIDGETO BE REMOVED

MLW = MEAN LOW WATERMHW = MEAN HIGH WATERMVc : MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCEMHC = MINIMUN HORIZONTAL CLEARANCEPêL = PROFILE GRADE LINECLR = CLEARANCE

ØY//Y1V4WV/øØØøØ

- NAV]GATIONWINDOW FEBRUARY 2017 SHEET 3 OF 10

SHORELINE

"t

APPLICA//IIT:ORI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT IONCONSULTANT : PARSONS BRI NCKERHOFF

FL

PROPOSED BRIDGE M.P. O.O WATERWAYBEGIN PROJECT M.P, 3.425 5R 30

BETWEEN PENSACOLA AND GULF BREEZE,ESCAI.4BIA & SAI,ITA ROSA COUNTIES, FLORIDA


PROPOSED BRIDGE PLAN AND ELEVATION (3 OF 3)

:Ñ

Direct¡on of Stat¡onina -

0 120 600

Feet

APE BOUNDARV

ooTrn+ktofn

t-14

tr¡ì{+ut-E

R/W LINE

.êl3t!6lË+

EXISTING BRIDGENO. 480035TO BE REMOVED

c covsT. sR 3o

PROPOSED BRIDGE NO.

480290

ùt

iQ PtER (TYP.)

R/W LINEPROPOSED BRIDGE NO,

480289 CITY OFGULF BREEZE PROPOSED

RIPRAP

APE BOUNDARYPLAN

LENCTH OF BRIDGE - MEASURED ALONGooI'(¡

çtoo+t!ôFso otr¡Foo ìFoo ILzo q

F,uF-¿oì¡-roü

l-{È

CONST

(4,918.9 M)

PROPOSED PGL100

80

60

40

20

0

-20

-40

MAX. WAVE CRESTEL.17.40

t_I

IMLW

EL. -O.3ù Q PIER (TYP,) APPROX, EXISTGROUND LINE

MHWEL. O.91'

lOO.Y E AREL.7.4g

ELEVATION

NOTES: LEGEND:

. EXISTING BRIDGETO EE REMOVED

I. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON NAVDAS.2. TOTAL QUANTITY OF RIPRAP IS 14,450 CUEIC YARDS.

MLW = MEAN LOW WATERMHW = MEAN HIGH WATERPGL = PROFILE GRADE LINE


oÐ'e

EXISTING DOLPHINTO BE REMOVEÐ

EXISTING FENDER SYSTEMTO BE REMOVED

EXISTING NAVIGATIONALooo-Jlr-

CHANNEL

125.0', (38.1 M)

ç CHANNELr 4,/ 7 "/

,/ l,Z ,Z ,Z ,zr L__

I

I

I

t_

III

I

t- ç PrER s2

G+t-5o

Iot--

It-IoI

\

Ft-

lr

APPLICAl'tT:F LORI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRAI{SPORTAT I ON

CONSULTAI¡iT : PARSONS BRI NCKERHOFF


PROPOSED BRIDGE M.P. O.O WATERWAYBEGIN PROJECT M.P. 3.425 SR 30

BETWEEN PENSACOLA A/¡úD GULF BREEZE,ESCAì,4BIA & SAI,ITA ROSA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

BRIDGE PLAN AID ELEVATION CHAI,INEL SPAÂI

EXISTING BRIDGEN0. 480035

TO BE REMOVED

I

I

I

I

t-

PROPOSED BRIDGEN0. 480290

PIER 51J

ñ",6oitô

t- l-I

I

II

I

PROPOSED FOOTINGOUTLINE (TYP.)

I

tI

150.0' (45.7 M)

NAVIGATIONAL CHANNELPLAN


16,138,0' (OVERALL LENGTH OF BRIDGE - MEASIJRED ALONG colvsrR. sR 30)

1009080706050403020100-10-20-30-40

ç PIER sl --1,100

908070605040302010

0-10-20-30-40

PROPOSED PGL Q PrER 52

MLWEL. -0.30', BOTTOM OF CHANNEL

EL. -33.50'!

LEGEND: ELEVATIONCGL =GCL :RCL :MLW :MHW =MVC :MHC =PGL :

CLEARANCE GAUGE LIGHTGREEN CENTER CHANNEL LIGHTRED CHANNEL MARGIN LIGHT (180" VISIBILITY)MEAN LOW WATERMEAN HIGH WATERMINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE (ABOVE MHW)M I N I MU M H O RI ZONT AL C LE ARANC EPROFILE GRADE LINE

NOTE

1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THESEPLANS ARE BASED ON NAVDgg.

- NAVIGATIONWINDOW

CHANNEL

GCL

RCL (TYP,)

150.0'

MAX. WAVE -cRESr IEL. 17.40 I

-lcooi

MHWEL. 0.91'

(J

ENAVIGATIONAL CHANNEL

PROPOSED LOWMEMBERMIN EL 66.00

lOO-Y EAREL.7.40'

342.5' MHC

020

Feet

80


F LORI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT I ONCONSULTANT : PARSONS BRI NCKERHOFF

APPLICAIIT:



BETWEEN PENSACOLA AlttD GULF BREEZE,ESCATIBIA & SAIUTA ROSA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION

ç coNsT. sR 30

159'-10" (OUT-TO-oUT)

74',-11" 1 0'-0' 74'-1 I',

8" 8"SHARE

PATHF-SHAPE BARRIER

DOT rNDEX 420)P.)

ARCHITECTURALCABLE RAILING(TYP.)

Slope: 0.01 Ft/Ft Slope: 0.01 Ft/Ft

TYPICAL SECTION - PROPOSED BRIDGES(AT CHANNEL SPAN - LOOKING AHEAD STATION)

(TIED ARCH SUPERSTRUCTURE NOT SHOWN)0520

Feet

aaa

VARIES -

,r:;l I I

1'-6y;' 1'-6yi'BARRIER BARRIER

10'-0' 3 LANES @) 12',-0" : 36'-0" 10'-0"

.t a 1'-6Y!' 1'-6Y2" --1 TVARTESI BARRTER BARRTER I I _8"l, to'-o' , 3 LANEI @ t2'-0" : 36'-0" r0'-0" ,1, Ll, to'-y"

SHLDR.tttSHLDR

n

PROFILE GRADEPOINT

0.02 Ft/Ft

tttPROF]LE GRADEPOINT

Slope: 0 02 Ft/Ft

SHLDR.PATH


tr

ú

aaa

APPLICANT:F LQRI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT ION




__ qETIEEN PENSACO_LA Ar{D GULF BREEZE,ESCNIBIA & SAI{TA ROSA COUNTIES, FLOF?DA

EXISTING BRIDGE PLAN AND ELEVATION ( 1 OF 3)

wDirect¡on of

0 120 600

APE BOUNDARYFeet

r7

R/W LINE

PENSACOLA .ôl3l(otatut

fluìN+(o

l-t4lrte\¡Iut-{E

SHORELINEEXISTII'IG BRIDGENO. 480035TO BE REMOVEDBEGIN ERIDGE

sTA. 63+96.50

EXISTING FISHINGPIER TO REMAIN

Q CONST. SR 30PROPOSED ERIDGE NO.440290

SHORELINEQ PIER (TYP.)

R/W LINEPROPOSED BRIDGE NO.4AO2A9

PLAN

APE BOUNDARY

OVERALL LENGTH = rllktr.¡

\ roo

Sao<60bnow20

=o{I -20\) -40t-E

100

80

60

40

20

o

-20

-40

BEGIN BRIDGEsTA. 63+96.50

MAX. WAVE CRESTEL.17.40 EXISTING PGL

ttLwEL. 4.3ù

IOO.YEARE1.7.40'

\l lrrrrr¡¡¿ c PIER (ÍYP.)

APPROX. EXIST,GROUND LINEMHW

EL. 0.91'

EXISTING ELEVATION

NOTES:

1, ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON NAVD,q,2, TOTAL QUANTITY OF RIPRAP IS 14,450 CUBTC YARDS.

LEGEND:

il lt

- EXISTING BRIDGETO BE REMOVED


ffit qreøruru 'Øt//&/&V4ØØ874 Vø//ffim V4//Ml4m WZ//ffiT/mø.øØ

t{

$

f

APPLICAIIT:F LORI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT ION

CONSULTANT : PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF



BETWEEN PENSACOLA A¡ID GULF BREEZE,ESCA|IBIA & SAI,ITA ROSA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

EXISTING BRIDGE PLAN AIúD ELEVATION (2 OF 3)

:Ñ

I D¡rection of Stat¡oníng>

0 120 600OF

FeetAPE BOUNDARY

7

f¡uìN+to

l-u¡lrl

={IUt-{ã

R/W LINE COUNTY LINEESCAMBIA/'ANTA ROSA

,ol8[\iìql

ø CHANNEL(PENSACOLA BAY)

EXISTING ERIDGENO. 480035TO BE REMOVED

fr¡rôui!n+f\

t-14

t¡¡è{I(Jl-E

î covsT. sR 30PROPOSÊD ARIDGE NO.

480290

via(

Ê5oFFI

ç PIER (TYP,) PROPOSED BRIDGE NO.480289R/W LINE

hrt

oF-ci

Y or, "ouroo^,

PLAN

160

140ñllzo\,ooIs0s60<40h20 rr¡

oÈ{-to \-4oVl-

È

OVERALL E XISTING BRIDGE(4,767.1 M) 160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

o

-20

-40

I'IAX, WAVE CRESTEL. 17.40',

fY)14ui1¡ì+t\

t-(âl!I{Iot-E

EXISrING PGL

MLWEL. -0.3t

tzl.oo APPROX. EXISTGROUND LINEMHW

EL. 0.91'

lOO-YEAREL. 7.40',

CHANNEL ç PIER (TYP.)

ø CHANNEL

EXISTING ELEVATION

NOTES: LEGEND:

1, ELEVATIOIIS SHOWN ON-THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON NAVD88.2. TOTAL QUANTITY OF RIPRAP IS

'4,450 CLJAIC YARDS.

- EXISTING BRIDGETO BE REMOVÊD

MLW = MEAilI Low WATERMHW = NEAN HIGH WATERMVC = MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCEMHC = MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCEPGL = PROFILE GRADE LINECLR = CLEARANCE

NAV IGATIONr " " wrvDow

-F

VMY/ffiøØ ffiwmwn&À vúøMøgm wØ wÆil/Æ4vtwwe a

TIö

=

il


t

aaa

EÌ{

SHORELINE

s

APPLICAI{T:F LORI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRAI{SPORTAT I ON

CONSULTAIttT : PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF



BETWEEN PENSACOLA AIÚD GULF BREEZE,ESCNIIBIA & SAIUTA ROSA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

EXISTING BRIDGE PLAI{ AND ELEVATION (3 OF 3)

:Ñ

Direction of Stationina -

o 120 600

FeetAPE EOUNDAR'I

tttoui!o+N

t*qa={IUt-E

R/W LINE

.ol8IJl(6l6lql

EXISTIN6 BRIDGENO. 48003sTO BE REMOVED

END BRIDGE5TA. 220+36.50

q co[sT. sR 30

PROPOSED BRIDGE NO.

480290

Q PIER (TYP.) PROPOSED BRIDGE NO,

480289R/W LINE CIT'I OF

GULF BREEZE PROPOSEDRIPRAP

APE BOUNDARYPLAN

BRIDGE LENCTH =(¡uìutuì+N

t-(4aI!

IUt-E

(4,767.1 M)

ro0

80

60

40

20

0

-20

-40

MAX. WAVE CRESTEL.17.4t

EXISTING PGL

END BRIDGEsTA. 220+36.50

100

80

60

40

20

0

-20

-40¡¿lLw

EL. -0.3U lOO-YEAREL. 7.40',

ç PÍER (fYP.) APPROX, EXIST.GROUND L]NE

MHWEL, 0,91' EXISTING ELEVATION

NOfES: LEGEND:

1. ELEVÃTIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON NAVD8P'2. TOTAL QUANTIfY OF RIPRAP IS 14,450 CUBIC YARDS.

- EXISTING ERIDGETO BE REMOVED

MLW : ¡'IEAN LOW WATERMHW = MEAN HIGH WATERPGL = PROFILE GRADE LINE


Q PIER 2-N

Q PrER 1-N

EXISTING FENDER SYSTEMTO BE REMOVED

Q PrER 2-S

a CHANNEL

125.O',

MAX. WAVECRESTEL. 17.40

J rlIE

/.- A PIER 2-N I!ô

MHWEL. 0.91' NAVIGATIONAL CHANNEI

Q PrER 2-S

ç_ IER 3-SlOO-YEARE1.7.40'

ç PrER 1-N ç PrER 1-S

APPLTCANT:F LORI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT I ON



PROPOSED BRIDGE M.P, O.O WATERWAYBEGIN PROJECT M.P. 3,425 SR 30

BETWEEN PENSACOLA A/i{D GULF BREEZE,ESCAIíBI A & SAI'íTA ROSA COUNT I ES , F LORI DA

EXISTING BRIDGE PLAIÚ NUD ELEVATION CHAI{NEL


EXISTING BRIDGENO. 480035

TO BE REMOVED

I PrER 3-Nç PrER 3-S

Q PrER 1-S 2"""\


12s.0' (38.1 M)

PIER 51 È5o

Iot*

It-5o

NAVIGATIONAL CHANNEL ST A'G DOLPH /,Vñt6oi!n

++++

TO BE REMOVED ç PrER s2

PROPOSED FOOTINGOUTLINE (TYP,)

_J

- -\=..,... '/

PLAN PROPOSED BRIDGENO. 480289

0VERALL EXISTINO BRIDGE LENOTH = 15,640.00' ,0rlu1009080706050403020100-10-20-30-40

PR9PjSED PCr _J EXISTING PGL lOO908070605040302010

0-10-20-30-40

MLW EL. -0.30'

Q PrER 3-NBOTTOM OF CHANNEL

EL. -33.50'+

LEGEND: EXISTING ELEVATIONCGL :6tvt --RÂ/I :MLW =MHW =MVC :MHC :PGL :

CLEARANCE GAUGE LIGHTGREEN NAVIGATION LIGHTRED NAVIGATION LIGHTMEAN LOW WATERMEAN HIGH WATERMINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE (ABOVE MHW)M I N I MU M HO RI ZONT AL C LE ARANC EPROFILE GRADE LINE

NOTE

1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THESEPLANS ARE BASED ON NAVDgg.

- NAVIGATIONWINDOW

020

Feet

80

t

Documents

April 7, 2017 PUBLIC NOTICE (03-17) - NAVCEN · april 7, 2017 public notice (03-17) bridge permit application to replace the bridge pensacola bay, mile 0.0, at state road 30, u.s