24
Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Problem 4 Origami Launcher Reporters: Matheus Pessôa, Lucas Maia Team Brazil: Andrius D., André Juan, Gustavo Saraiva, Henrique Ferreira, Lucas Maia, Lucas Tonetto, Matheus Pessôa, Ricardo Gitti 1 Team Brazil

Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Problem 4Origami Launcher

Reporters: Matheus Pessôa, Lucas Maia

Team Brazil: Andrius D., André Juan, Gustavo Saraiva, Henrique Ferreira, Lucas Maia, Lucas Tonetto, Matheus Pessôa, Ricardo Gitti

1

Team Brazil

Page 2: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

The problem

oFolded paper structures such as the Miura-oriorigami can be programmed to exhibit a wide rangeof elastic properties depending on their creaseand defect patterns. Design and build an origamicannon to vertically launch a standard Ping-Pongball using only a single uncut sheet of A4 paper(80g/m²). How is the height of the ball elevationrelated to the folding pattern? Optimize yourdesign to achieve the maximum height possible.

2

Page 3: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Metamaterials

oOrigami metamaterials display, for example, auxetic behavior and multistability, the latter allowing reprogrammable configurations [3].

3

1. Flower petals 2. Insect wings

Images: 1. https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-wings-insect-isolated-white-background-clipping-path-image72794552

2. https://www.asianscientist.com/2014/10/in-the-lab/making-3d-metamaterials-natural-bent/3. PRL 2016, V. Brunck,Elastic theory of origami-based metamaterials

[1] [2]

Page 4: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Behavior of metamaterials

oContraction and dilation of the system

4

oMovement in a given direction is reflectedtowards another direction

Image: https://materia.nl/article/toolkit-build-reconfigurable-metamaterials/

3. Configurable metamaterial

Page 5: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Investigating Miura-Ori patterns

5Image: Jesse L. Siverberg - “Using origami design principles to fold reprogrammable mechanical metamaterials”

4. 3D reconstruction of Miura-Ori

Patterns with geometric parameters

oGeometrical construction

oBased on creases and valleyso Can be characterized accordingly to different

geometric angles and properties

oVery important: Poisson’s ration!

Page 6: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Poisson’s ratio- Why it is important

oFrom the references [1], we have that the origami’s Poisson’s ratio isnegative!

oTherefore, it is an auxetic material

6Reference [1], Image 6- Z.Y. Wei- “Geometric Mechanics of Periodic Pleated Origami”

Image 5- https://groups.exeter.ac.uk/auxetic/auxetic_f2.html

5. Behavior of an auxetic material

𝑣 = −𝑊

𝐿

𝑑𝐿

𝑑𝑊

𝑣 = 𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑛′𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑊 = 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ𝐿 = 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ

𝑬𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔

𝒗 = 𝟏 −𝟏

𝒔𝒆𝒏 𝜶 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝜽𝟐

Theoretical prediction for Miura-Ori

6. 3D modelling for Miura-Ori pattern

General case

Page 7: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Negative Poisson’s ratio- evidence

7

7. Experiments for Miura-Ori patterns confirming the

negative Poisson’s ratio.

Image 7: Jesse L. Siverberg - “Using origami design principles to fold reprogrammable mechanical metamaterials”

o Justifies the choosing of a Miura-Oripattern for our investigations

oNow focusing on the problem itself

Achieving maximum

heights with a Miura-Ori

Page 8: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Energy on a Miura-Ori origami

8

𝑼

𝒌𝟎𝒍=𝟏

𝟐𝜽+ − 𝜽𝟎

𝟐 +𝟏

𝟐𝜽− + 𝜽𝟎 − 𝟐𝝅 𝟐 + 𝜷 − 𝜷𝟎

𝟐 + 𝝓− 𝝅 𝟐

𝑬𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔

𝑙 = 𝑓𝑜𝑙𝑑 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑘0 = 𝑠𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡

Applied Angular Hooke’s law

8. Angular schemes

for a Miura-Ori folding

pattern

Non-dimensional approximation of the Energy behavior

Image 8: Jesse L. Siverberg - “Using origami design principles to fold reprogrammable mechanical metamaterials”

Our model also

considerspattern deffects!

Page 9: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Energy on a Miura-Ori origami

9

𝑼

𝒌𝟎=𝒍

𝟐𝜽+ − 𝜽𝟎

𝟐 + 𝜽− + 𝜽𝟎 − 𝟐𝝅 𝟐 + 𝟐 𝜷 − 𝜷𝟎𝟐

𝑬𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔

𝑙 = 𝑓𝑜𝑙𝑑 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑘0 = 𝑠𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑛 = 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠𝐶 = 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠

o 𝑙 can be varied experimentally

o 𝒌𝟎 is constant for all experiments, same 80 𝑔

𝑐𝑚2 uncut sheef ot paper

o Variation in (𝑙 ∗ 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒) implies angular changes

o Different energies → different heights!

Page 10: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Experimental considerations

oMiura-Ori with 4 different number of foldso 5,6, 8 ,16 folds

10

56

8 16

Page 11: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Angle measurements (𝜽𝟎, 𝝓, 𝜷𝟎, 𝜽+, 𝜽−)

117 folds 16 folds

6 folds5 folds

Page 12: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Experimental considerations

oEnergy conversion𝑼𝒊 = 𝑼𝒇

𝑼𝒊

𝒌𝟎= 𝒍

𝟏

𝟐𝜽+ − 𝜽𝟎

𝟐 +𝟏

𝟐𝜽− + 𝜽𝟎 − 𝟐𝝅 𝟐 + 𝜷− 𝜷𝟎

𝟐 + 𝝓− 𝝅 𝟐

Theoretically, we expect a linear behavior of𝑼𝒊

𝒌𝟎in function of 𝑼𝒇!

12

𝑼𝒇 = 𝒎𝒈𝒉

Page 13: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Proof of angular importance on the problem

13

o Linear behavior is comproved for thesefour origamis!

𝛼 ≅ (9.6 ± 0.4)𝑎. 𝑢.

𝐴ℎ

Page 14: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Helicoidal model

oAnother way to build an origami pattern!

14

1 full step

Measurement of a full step in centimeters

Page 15: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Helicoidal model

oPlotting results for the helicoidal model

15

o Quadratic fit!

o Explanation: a direct conversion of energy from the elastic one stored in the origami (completely) into the height of the ball!

𝑦 = 𝑦0 + 𝐵1𝑥 + 𝐵2𝑥2

𝐵1 = (39.63446 ± 0.465)

𝐵2 = (−1.3313 ± 0.01)

Page 16: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Distribution for both experimental models

16

Page 17: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

All experimental results

17

Page 18: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Heights achieved with all origamis

18

Page 19: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Summary

19

Miura-ori geometryExperiments Linear fit for results!Energy

Helicoid model

Maximized jump: helicoid model with step size of 15 cm!

𝒉𝑨 ~ 𝟐𝟔 ± 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓 𝒄𝒎

Quadratic fit due to

elastic properties

Page 20: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

References

o [1] - Image https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-wings-insect-isolated-white-background-clipping-path-image72794552

o [2] Image- https://www.asianscientist.com/2014/10/in-the-lab/making-3d-metamaterials-natural-bent/

o [3] PRL 2016, V. Brunck,Elastic theory of origami-based metamaterials

20

Page 21: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Appendix

21

Page 22: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Distribution for all Miura-Ori results

22

Page 23: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

Experimental results for both designs

23

Page 24: Apresentação do PowerPointiptnet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/X-4-Br.pdf · 1 Team Brazil. Team Brazil Introduction Experiments Conclusion Origami Launcher The problem oFolded

Team

Brazil

Introduction

Experiments

Conclusion

Origami

Launcher

24