57
Apples to Apples: The research and the story it tells Lisa Meyer, AVID District Director Dr. Steven Travis, Coordinator for Data Analysis Deer Park Independent School District, Texas

Apples to Apples:

  • Upload
    gamba

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Apples to Apples:. The research and the story it tells. Lisa Meyer, AVID District Director Dr. Steven Travis, Coordinator for Data Analysis Deer Park Independent School District, Texas. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Apples to Apples:

Apples to Apples:The research and the story it tells

Lisa Meyer, AVID District DirectorDr. Steven Travis, Coordinator for Data AnalysisDeer Park Independent School District, Texas

Page 2: Apples to Apples:

AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society.

2

Page 3: Apples to Apples:

One day we asked ourselves….

What if we could compare AVID students to other students who are just like them; students who are demographically identical, but who are not in AVID?

3

Page 4: Apples to Apples:

We Tracked 2 Cohorts

• We collected data on 2 cohorts from 8th to 12th grade

Cohort 1 was tracked from 2008-09 to 2012-13 Cohort 2 was tracked from 2009-10 to 2013-14

• Our data analysis only included students who were:

Asked to join AVID in 8th grade Enrolled in our district from 8th grade through 12th

grade

4

Page 5: Apples to Apples:

AVID Recruitment:The Data-Driven Wide Net

• 75-95 Grade Average• Less than 10 absences• Less than 10 discipline referrals• Not already in PAP or GT classes• On track to graduate on a Texas

Recommended Graduation Plan

5

Page 6: Apples to Apples:

Average demographics when students were offered to join AVID in 8th grade• Deer Park ISD At-A-Glance

• District Enrollment = 12,468• 8th Graders = 935• 52.0% White• 43.3% Hispanic• 2.6% African American• 39.5% Economically Disadvantaged

Average Enrollment over 2 years

6

Page 7: Apples to Apples:

Where We StartedWho were those 8th Graders?

7

Page 8: Apples to Apples:

8th Grade Demographics

DISTRICT 2 YR AVG (12,468)

2.6%

43.3%

52.0%2.2%

Ethnicity

African AmericanHispanicWhiteOther

COHORT 1 and 2 (524)

8

1.9%

47.5%

48.9%

1.7%

Ethnicity

African Amer-icanHispanicWhiteOther

Page 9: Apples to Apples:

8th Grade Demographics

DISTRICT 2 YR AVG (12,467)

39.5%

60.5%

Economically Disadvantaged

Eco Dis Not Eco Dis

COHORT 1 and 2 (524)

9

39.5%

60.5%

Economically Disadvantaged

Eco Dis Not Eco Dis

Page 10: Apples to Apples:

AVID - Participation x Years

9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%100.0%

75.0%

52.7%

39.9%

Percent of Cohort 1 and 2 in AVID

10

Page 11: Apples to Apples:

AVID - Participation x Years

9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade0

20406080

100120140160180200

148

111

7859

Number of Cohort 1 and 2 in AVID

11

Page 12: Apples to Apples:

Comparing AVID and Non-AVID

Definitions

• Data referred to as “AVID,” pertains to students who were invited to be in AVID, accepted the invitation, and have been in AVID for all 4 years.

• Data referred to as “Non-AVID” pertains to students who were invited to be in AVID, but who did not ever become part of our AVID elective classes.

12

Page 13: Apples to Apples:

Cohort 1 and 2 (524)

28.2%

71.8%

Accepted AVIDDeclined AVID

13

Accepted AVID Invitation (148) vs. Declined AVID Invitation (376)

8th Graders

Page 14: Apples to Apples:

The Demographic Split

43.2%

52.0%

2.7% 2.1%

White HispanicAfr Am Other

51.1%45.7

%

1.6%1.7%

White HispanicAfr Am Other

14

AVID Group / Accepted Invitation (148)Non-AVID Group / Declined Invitation (376)

8th Graders

Page 15: Apples to Apples:

Socio-Economic Status

41.2% 58.8

%

Eco DisNot Eco Dis

15

AVID Group / Accepted Invitation (148)Non-AVID Group / Declined Invitation (376)

38.8% 61.2

%

Eco Dis Not Eco Dis

8th Graders

Page 16: Apples to Apples:

WHERE DID WE END UP?

16

Page 17: Apples to Apples:

AVID vs. Non-AVIDAverage Discipline Referrals / Student

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

0.99

1.77

2.091.87

0.68

1.31

1.89

0.82

Non-AVIDAVID

17

Neither in AVID

Page 18: Apples to Apples:

Average Discipline Referrals / StudentHispanic Students

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

1.16

2.09

2.512.22

0.61

1.32

2.15

1.04

Non-AVIDAVID

18

Page 19: Apples to Apples:

Average Discipline Referrals / StudentWhite Students

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

0.88

1.58

1.80

1.60

0.77

1.19

1.68

0.54

Non-AVIDAVID

19

Page 20: Apples to Apples:

Average Discipline Referrals / StudentEconomically Disadvantaged Students

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

1.01

1.92

2.54

2.15

0.61

1.67

1.93

0.75

Non-AVIDAVID

20

Page 21: Apples to Apples:

More Definitions

• “TAKS” is the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills. The results are used for AYP and state accountability systems.

• “Met Standard” on TAKS means to have passed it and shown a sufficient understanding of the state curriculum.

• “Commended” on TAKS means to have passed considerably above the passing standard, at a high level of academic achievement.

21

Page 22: Apples to Apples:

TAKS Math Commended

• Students who achieve commended performance:

1. Use multiple problem-solving strategies and logic to find reasonable solutions

2. Transfer math knowledge between abstract and concrete applications

3. Use connections among math concepts to make generalizations and apply them to new situations22

Page 23: Apples to Apples:

TAKS – Math – Commended

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

16.8% 15.3%

6.3%

16.4%

18.2%20.3%

9.0%

24.7% Non-AVIDAVID

23

Page 24: Apples to Apples:

TAKS – Math – Commended Hispanic Students

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

18.8%

14.4%

5.4%

17.0%

24.7% 24.7%

11.3%

28.9%

Non-AVIDAVID

24

Page 25: Apples to Apples:

TAKS – Math – Commended White Students

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

15.6%

16.0%

5.9%

15.3%12.5%

17.2%

6.8%

22.2% Non-AVIDAVID

25

Page 26: Apples to Apples:

TAKS – Math – Commended Economically Disadvantaged Students

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

21.5%

15.6%

7.7%

18.6%

24.6%21.3%

15.6%

25.0% Non-AVIDAVID

26

Page 27: Apples to Apples:

TAKS Reading Commended: Grade 9

• Students who achieve commended performance:

1. Can answer questions of varying levels of difficulty and support those answers with evidence from the text.

2. Can recognize similarities and differences across texts most of the time.

3. Read and comprehend more difficult texts independently

27

Page 28: Apples to Apples:

ELA Commended Grades: 10-11

• Students who achieve commended performance:

1. Are able to draw insightful conclusions and make meaningful generalizations to develop a thorough understanding of a text

2. Are able to analyze ideas across texts most of the time

3. Develop ideas in depth and use organizational strategies that contribute to the effectiveness of a piece of writing

4. Produce writing that is engaging and authentic

28

Page 29: Apples to Apples:

TAKS – Reading – Commended

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%43.9%

26.2%

11.0%15.1%

41.2%

25.7%

7.3%

18.2%

Non-AVIDAVID

29

Page 30: Apples to Apples:

TAKS – Reading – Commended Hispanic Students

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

38.8%

24.4%

8.4%11.3%

32.5%24.7%

8.1%

22.2% Non-AVIDAVID

30

Page 31: Apples to Apples:

TAKS – Reading – Commended White Students

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%

48.4%

26.7%

13.4%18.3%

50.0%

25.0%

7.0%

14.8%

Non-AVIDAVID

31

Page 32: Apples to Apples:

TAKS – Reading – Commended Economically Disadvantaged Students

8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

40.3%

19.3%9.8%

14.4%

37.7%

26.2%

4.5%

25.0% Non-AVIDAVID

32

Page 33: Apples to Apples:

Average GPA / Student

9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade3.00

3.10

3.20

3.30

3.40

3.50

3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4.00

3.57

3.433.38

3.833.75

3.90

Non-AVIDAVID

33

8th GPA – AVID = 89.98 and Non-AVID = 88.05

Page 34: Apples to Apples:

Average GPA / StudentHispanic Students

9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade3.00

3.10

3.20

3.30

3.40

3.50

3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4.00

3.38

3.253.21

3.763.68

3.85

Non-AVIDAVID

34

8th GPA – AVID = 89.69 and Non-AVID = 87.13

Page 35: Apples to Apples:

Average GPA / StudentWhite Students

9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade3.00

3.10

3.20

3.30

3.40

3.50

3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4.00

3.71

3.573.52

3.91

3.79

3.93

Non-AVIDAVID

35

8th GPA – AVID = 90.29 and Non-AVID = 88.77

Page 36: Apples to Apples:

Average GPA / StudentEconomically Disadvantaged Students

9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade3.00

3.10

3.20

3.30

3.40

3.50

3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4.00

3.39

3.24 3.23

3.73 3.75

3.94

Non-AVIDAVID

36 8th GPA – AVID = 90.17 and Non-AVID = 87.19

Page 37: Apples to Apples:

37

% who took the PSAT in 9th Grade

81.1%

18.9%

Took PSATDid not take PSAT

AVID Group (120 out of 148 took) Non-AVID Group (4 out of 376 took)

1.1%

98.9%

Took PSATDid not take PSAT

9th Graders

Page 38: Apples to Apples:

PSAT – 9th Graders – Scale Scores

AVID (120 out of 148) Non-AVID (4 out of 376)100

105

110

115

120

110.2 110.5

PSAT

38

9th Graders

Page 39: Apples to Apples:

% who took the PSAT in 10th Grade

91.0%

9.0%

Took PSATDid not take PSAT

39

AVID Group (101 out of 111 took) Non-AVID Group (330 out of 377 took)87.5

%

12.5%

Took PSATDid not take PSAT

10th Graders

Page 40: Apples to Apples:

PSAT – 10th Graders – Scale Scores

AVID (101 out of 111) Non-AVID (330 out of 377)100

105

110

115

120 117.8115.2

PSAT

40

10th Graders

Page 41: Apples to Apples:

% who took the PSAT in 11th Grade

93.6%

6.4%

Took PSATDid not take PSAT

AVID Group (73 out of 78 took) Non-AVID Group (155 out of 371 took)41.8

%

58.2%

Took PSATDid not take PSAT

11th Graders

41

Page 42: Apples to Apples:

PSAT – 11th Graders – Scale Scores

AVID (73 out of 78) Non-AVID (155 out of 371)100

105

110

115

120

125

130126.5

125.0

PSAT

42

11th Graders

Page 43: Apples to Apples:

% who took the SAT in 11th Grade

83.3%

16.7%

Took SATDid not take SAT

43

AVID Group (65 out of 78 took) Non-AVID Group (29 out of 371 took)

7.8%

92.2%

Took SATDid not take SAT

11th Graders

Page 44: Apples to Apples:

SAT 11th Graders – Scale Scores

AVID (65 out of 78) Non-AVID (29 out of 371)1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1312.81289.7

SAT

44

11th Graders

*First SAT score (if multiple attempts)

Page 45: Apples to Apples:

Average Advanced Academic Courses/Student

9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

0.26 0.350.59 0.52

0.96

1.47

2.21 2.27

Non-AVIDAVID

45

8th Grade Advanced Courses – none for both groups

Page 46: Apples to Apples:

Cohort 1 – Senior Survey

• 1. How well do you feel Deer Park ISD has prepared you for post-graduate plans?

AVID (23/25) NON-AVID (112/211)

o Extremely well prepared 47.8% 15.2% 82%

57%o Well prepared 34.8% 42.0%

o Neither well nor poorly 13.0% 29.5%

o Poorly prepared 0.0% 9.8%

o Completely unprepared 4.3% 3.6%

46

Survey given at end of senior year, May 2013

Page 47: Apples to Apples:

Cohort 1 – Senior Survey

• 2. What are your educational plans for the year following graduation?

AVID (23/25) NON-AVID (111/211)

o Technical/vocational program 0.0% 8.1%

o Two-year junior college 47.8% 55.9%

o Four-year college/university 47.8% 27.0%

o Postpone education 4.3% 4.5%

o No plans further education/training 0.0% 4.5%

47

Page 48: Apples to Apples:

Cohort 1 – Senior Survey

• 3. To how many colleges or universities have you applied?

AVID (23/25) NON-AVID (110/211)

o None 4.3% 39.1%

o One 4.3% 37.3%

o Two 4.3% 14.5%

o Three 26.1% 4.5%

o Four or more 60.9% 4.5%

48

Page 49: Apples to Apples:

Cohort 1 – Senior Survey

• 4. To how many colleges or universities have you been accepted?

AVID (23/25) NON-AVID (110/211)

o None 13.0% 41.8%

o One 34.8% 40.0%

o Two 26.1% 12.7%

o Three 17.4% 1.8%

o Four or more 8.7% 3.6%

49

Page 50: Apples to Apples:

Cohort 1 – Senior Survey

• 5. How many scholarships have you applied for?

AVID (23/25) NON-AVID (111/211)

o None 13.0% 65.8%

o One 0.0% 11.7%

o Two 4.3% 8.1%

o Three 8.7% 6.3%

o Four or more 73.9% 8.1%

50

Page 51: Apples to Apples:

Cohort 1 – Senior Survey

• 6. How many scholarship offers have you received?

AVID (23/25) NON-AVID (111/211)

o None 43.5% 76.6%

o One 17.4% 10.8%

o Two 26.1% 9.0%

o Three 8.7% 1.8%

o Four or more 4.3% 1.8%

51

Page 52: Apples to Apples:

Cohort 1 – Senior Survey

• 7. Have you completed a Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA)?

AVID (22/25) NON-AVID (106/211)

o Yes 72.7% 38.7%

o No 27.3% 61.3%

52

Page 53: Apples to Apples:

Cohort 1 – Senior Survey

• 8. In ten years, what type of employment do you anticipate having?

AVID (22/25) NON-AVID (110/211)

o None 4.5% 4.5%

o Plant or manufacturing 4.5% 10.9%

o Self-employed 31.8% 13.6%

o Service industry 13.6% 2.7%

o Professional field 45.5% 68.2%

53

Page 54: Apples to Apples:

Cohort 1 – Senior Survey

• 9. In ten years, approximately what salary do you anticipate earning?

AVID (23/25) NON-AVID (110/211)

o Less than $20,000 / year 0.0% 4.5%

o $20,000 to $40,000 / year 8.7% 8.2%

o $40,000 to $70,000 / year 47.8% 30.0%

o $70,000 to $100,000 / year 17.4% 27.3%

o Over $100,000 / year 26.1% 30.0%

54

Page 55: Apples to Apples:

What’s Next?

• Complete the data report for the cohort’s senior year

• Other data as seems appropriate

55

Page 56: Apples to Apples:

IN THEIR OWN WORDSThe AVID Experience…

56

Page 57: Apples to Apples:

Contact Information• Lisa L. Meyer Director of Social Studies and Advanced Academic Programs [email protected] 832-668-7112

• Dr. Steven Travis Coordinator for Data Analysis [email protected] 832-668-7122

• Deer Park ISD website: www.dpisd.org57