APPENDIX-I

V.1 REGRESSION MODELS FOR SOCIAL FACTORS DETERMlNMG FERTILITY AMONG ADOPTER

V.2 REGRESSION MODELS FOR SOCIAL FACTORS DETERMINING FERTILITY AMONG NON ADOPTER

FACTORS DETERMMING FERTLLITY BEHAVIOUR OF WOMEN AMONG ADOF'TER AND N o h ADOPTER OF FAMILY PLANNING METHOD ACROSS

RELIGIOUS GROUPS

Fntility =Total number of livinn children x 100 Difference between W a g e age and present age

This fertility is taken as dependent variable and other socio-economic factors such as Place of the respondent, Family Type. House type, Electrification, Water facility, Structure of house, Present age of female, Present age of male house. Religion, Caste, Occupation of female, Occupation of male husband, Family monthly income, Family monthly expenditure, Marriage age of fmale, Marriage age of male, Age at permanent method of female Age at temporary method of female, Complaint about using of family planning method, Body condition of female. Son preference, College level education of female, School level education of male, College level education of male, Incentives received, Age of last child is taken as independent variable. Simple multiple linear regression techniques adopted in order to find out factors determining fertility of women

om percent significanl level. ** md "* rcfaa five

(viii)

I. DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSE HOLD RESPONDENT TO THE TOTAL AGREED

OPINION-AMONG ADOPTERS (Percentage)

1 1 . DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSE HOLD RESPONDENT TO THE TOTAL AGREED

OPINION-AMONG NON ADOPTERS (Percentage)

I. DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSE HOLD RESPONDENT TO THE TOTAL AGREED OPINION- AMONG ADOPTERS (Weighted Avenge)

RELIGION AND OPINION

Note: Figures in parenthesis indicate percentage. The responden! who agreedabow the opinion to the total respondent

TABLE-M.2 CAST AND OPlNION

I Forward / Backward I SCIST 1 1 Opinion

*: lk ~spondck who agmrdaboui ;he opinion fo rk total respondcw

Caste / Total

TABLE-VI.3

RESPONDENT EDUCATION AND OPINION

/ Opinion 1 lliitente 1 Literate / Primary / High / Higbn 1 College / Totd 1 r h w i Secondary

*: The ~spondent who ogreedabour ;he opini& to the total respon&dem

HUSBAND EDUCATION AND OPINION

Opinion Illiterate Litente Primary Higb Higber r h w i Secondary

Note: Figwes in pmcnthcsis indicate percentage. '. Tlw respondrtu who agreed abut the opinion to the total resporrciGnt

TABLE-V1.S RESPONDENT OCCUPATlON AND OPlNlON

*: The responde; who agreed about ;he opinion to the totol respondent

TABLEVI. 6

HUSBAND OCCUPATION AND OPINION

': lk hrspondcnr w b agreedabow the opinion to the total respon&nr

n. DISTRILIUTION OF HOUSE HOLD RESPONDENT TO THE TOTAL AGREED OPINION- AMONG NON ADOPTERS (Weighted Average)

RELIGION AND OPINION

Nore: Figures in parenlksis indrcare percenrage. *: The respondent who agreed abour the opinion ro the roral respondenr

Opinion

TABLE-VI.8 CASTE AND OPINION

Cute

Religion

Nore: Figures in parenthesis indicate percenlagr. *: 7 7 ~ hesponhnr who agreed about rk opinion to [he rota1 responhnl

Total

EDUCATION OF THE RESPONDENT AND OPINION

Note: Figures in parenthesis indicate percentage. *: The respond en^ who agreed about the opinion to rhe roral respondent

TABLEVI.10 HUSBAND EDUCATION AND OPlNlON

*: lk ~ 5 p o n d e ~ who agreed obour ;he opinion ro the toral respondent

TABLEVI.11

RESPONDENT OCCUPATION AND OPINION

Note: Figures inporenhsis indicate percentage. *: The respondent who agreedabout the opinion lo !he total respodnt

TABLE-VI.12

HUSBAND OCCUPATION AND OPINION

Note: Figwos in parenfhcsis indicate prcewoge. *: The respondent who agreed about the opinion to the total respondent

V1.13 STEP WlSE REGRESSION DETERMINANT MODEL FOR ATTITUDE OF

WOMEN AMONG ADOPTER

V1.23 STEP WlSE REGRESSION DETERMINANT MODEL FOR AlTlTUDE OF

WOMEN AMONG NON ADOPTER

(xvi)

STEP-WISE RECRESSlON DETERMINANT MODELS FOR ADOPTER

and '*' refers fiw -1 and I0 prcml oignificanl level mpcclively

(xvii)

VARIABLES 1 MODELS1 1 MODEL2 I MODEL3 1 MODEL4 CONSTANT 1 12.037 / 11.818 1 12.378 (12.159 FEXP

NMc: Figure in h e bracket indicate$!' values. rcfm one amrt significant level. ** md *** nfm five pc~cm and 10 pnant signiliean; level respctively.

(xviii)

TABLE-VI. 15

n I I I I

F 1 11.522 / 8.222 1 6.998 1 5.231 Note: Figure in the ksdtn indicaks 'I' values. ' refers one percent significant level, **

and *** rcfm five percent and 10 pmmt sipificanl level mpcctively.

(xix)

n I 1 I 1 F 111.514 1 8.949 16.911 1 5.570 Note Figure in r k bracket indicates'[' values, ' refers one pmenl significant level,

and "* refers five percent and 10 p m e m signilicant level respectively.

1 8.883 16290 I 5.174 1 4.308 Note: Figure in the bracket indicates't' values, * refers one pnrcnt significanl level.

and *** mfm five pcrccnt and 10 percent significant level mpxtively

Notc F ' i u z n the hcka indieate't' v a k , * refen one pcrcmt significant level. and *** r e f m five w e n t and 10 pemnl significant level mpectivel).

(xxii)

TABLEVI.19

OPINION-7

Notr: Figure in the brackd indicntn't' values. * r e f m one percent significant level. *' and "* refers five percent and 10 prcent significant level respectively.

OPINION-R

I I I I

F - 1 8.382 1 6.281 1 4.993 14.124 h e : Figure In the track* indicnksl' valucr. ' r c k n one percent significant lejel. *'

and '*' refers live pemnt and 10 percent significant level respectively

(xxiv)

F 1 2.672 1 2.050 1 1.649 / 1.387 Note: Figure in t k bracket indieatn'l' values. refers one pnrcnt signififant level,

and *" rcfm five percent and 10 paccnt significant lwel respectively

, 8 , I F I I 1 2.654

I 1 1.938 1 1.678 / 1.361

Note: Figure in the bracket indicws't' vducs. * refers one acent significant level. ' and *** refers five p e n t and ~ o p r a n t significani level res&tively

STEP-WISE REGRESSION DETERMINANT MODELS FOR

NON-ADOPTER

n I I I I

F 1 2.683 1 2.377 1 2.189 11.861 Nae: Figm in tht brncket indicata't' values. ' rcfm one percent significant level, *'

and *** nfm five percent and 10 pment significant level respectibely.

(xxvii)

OPINIONJ

Note: Figwe in the b k c l indicatcs't' values, * refm one pmnl significanl level, '* and *** refm five percent and 10 percent significant level nspeclivcly.

(xxviii)

1 I I

F 1 6.633 / 5.221 / 5.276 1 4.420 Note: Figure in the bracket ind imsat ' values. * refers one uercent significant level. **

an2 *** r e f m five pvcent and 10 pncent significanl'lcvel rer&tivei)

I I I I

F 1 8.209 1 5.744 1 5.771 1 4.455 Note: Figure in the bracket indicates't' values. * refers one pcrcmt sipilifanc level. '

and *** refm five pmcnt and 10 pcranl sipificanl level nspstively.

I I I F 1 2.207 1 2.052 1 1.788 1 1.613 Nott: Figure in the bracket indiaes'l' values. ' refen one prceni significant level, **

and *** refen five percent and 10 percent significant level respectively.

TABLE-M.28

OPINION-6

Note: Figure in the b a c k indicater'l' values. ' refers one percent significant level. and *** r e f m five p r a n t and 10 prcmt significant level respectively.

I I

F 1 5.703 1 4.414 1 4.001 3 148 %Me: Figure in thc h k n ~ndicates'l' balucr * nfm om percent signtficant ~esel. '

and "* rcfm five pml and I0 percent significant level respectively

TABLEVUO

I I I F I I 2 . W 1 8.622 1 6.932 1 5.167 Nole: Figure in the h k c t ind iwa ' t ' values, refers one pox11 significant level, "

OPINION4

and **' nfm five pcrccnl and 10 percent significant level respectively.

VARIABLES CONSTANT

FEXP

lNCF

MODELS1 11.491 -0.000230 (1.14) 0.0001268

MODEL2 12.195 -0.000197 (0.95) 0.0002016

MODEL3 13.508 -0.000226 (1.08) 0.00001254

M O D E M 13.609 -0.0000 144 (0.67) 0.0001324

VARIABLES I MODELS-1 I MODEL2 I MODEL3 1 M O D E M CONSTANT 1 9.786 1 9.149 1 12.703 1 10.722

FEXP 1 -0.0005001 1.35) 1 -0.000452 1 -0.000574 1 -0.000520

I I I F 1 7.763 1 4.942 / 4.275 1 2.%7 Note Figure in the bracket indicates't' values. refen one percent significant level, **

and *** rcfm five percent end 10 percent significant level mpstively.

and **' refers five pranl and 10 p e r m 1 slpilicanl level mpcctivel!.

FACTORS DETERMINING ATTITUDE OF WOMEN TOWARDS FERTILITY PREFERENCE AND FAMILY SIZE NORMS AMONG

ADOPTERS AND NON-ADOPTERS OF FAMILY PLANNING METHODS ACROSS RELlGIOUS GROUP

In order to tind out factors determining fertility preference and family planning norms

among the women across religious groups, the binary logistic regression techniques adopted.

The Dependent Variables includes, OPlNl = Parents can give proper love to their

children only in small family. OPiN2 =Describes having greater number of son's, means a

higher social status. OPIN, = Refers all newly married couples should be given information on

birth control techniques. OPlNr =Represents what is your opinion about introducing sex

education in SchwVCollege. OPlNr = Indicates having fewer children is good for mother's

health. OPIN6=Describes that it is desirable to limit the size of the family so that all children

will be getting adquate care. OPlN, =Indicates that all mothers should providing information

on birth conhol techniques to their grown up daughter OPINs = Stands for regardless of sex

should two children be considered enough. OPlNp =Refers to practice of family planning

againn their religion. OPlNlo =indicate that large family means bener security in old age. The

independent variables include Place of the respondent Family Typc, Religion, Caste,

Education, present age of respondent, marriage age of respondent are taken.

. TaMc - 1. Parents can give proper love to thdr children only in mall BmUy (OPI1)

female Education of male I HEDU / 0.093 1 0.631 1 0.427 Occu~ation of 1 OCCF 1 0.004 1 0.001 1 0.969

Variables description

respondent Family Type Religion Caste Education of

0.825 4.320 0.038 male 31-41 Constant

Place of the 1 PLA 1 0.164 1 0.469 1 0.493

FAM REL C AS EDU

Variable Symbols

Coefficient Wald

-0.123 0.316 -0.007 -0.286

Significance

0.219 4.715 0.001 6.764

0.640 0.030 0.975 0.009

Table - 2. H.vinx grater nnmbar of son's, m a w a higher social rtatw (OPU) Variabks 1 Variable 1 Coefficient / Wald 1 Sianific~cc description 1 Symbols Place of the 1 PLA 1 0.406 1 5.949 10.015

female Education of male I HEDU 1 0.136 1 2.726 1 0.099 Occuvation of 1 OCCF 1 0.03 1 / 0.230 1 0.631

respondent Fmily Type Religion Castc Education of

femaie Occupation of 1 OCCM 10.190 / 9.991 1 0.002

F AM REL CAS EDU

0.357 0.379 -0.218 -0.025

3.960 13.832 1.845 0.100

0.047 0.000 0.174 0.751

male Income o f the family Family expenditure k n t age o f

, female 31-40 t Present age o f I female above 4 1 Prcxnt age o f male 3 1-40

I Present age o f

Square r~agelker R square 1 0.1 19 I I

I male above 4 1 I Mamage age o f 1 female 2 1-30 ' Marriage age o f male31-41

I ~ o n m t -2 Log likely hood

I CoxBrSnell R

FINC

FEXP

AGEFD2

AGEFDI

AGEMDI

AGEMD2

0.000

0.000

-0.046

0.368

-0.347

-0.157 1

0.193

0 720

0.617

MARFDI

MARMD2

-0.7 1 1 656.646 0.073

0.053

0.028

0.003

2.154

1.524

0.159

0.660

0.3%

0.432

0.095

-0.28 1

-0.71 1

0.817

0.866

0.957

0.142

0.2 17

0.690

1

Tabk - 5 .Indluta L.vi.g fewer children I8 good for mother's h d t h . (OPW)

(xlii)

Variables description .

respondent Family Type Religion Caae Education o f

Place of the 1 PLA 10.159 10.172 1 0.678

Variable Symbols

FAM REL CAS EDU

Coefficient

-0.054 1.039 -0.358 0.067

Wald

0.017 15.223 0.832 0.122

Significance

0.896 0.000 0.362 0.727

I Tabk - 6, b It d u l n b k to Umlt the ria oftbe family ro that all children will be getting adequate care (OP16)

female Education of male I HEDU 1 0.476 1 3.622 1 0.057 Occuvation of / OCCF / 0.697 1 1.380 1 0.240

Variables description

respondent Family Type Religion Castc Education of

fmaie Occupation of / OCCM / -0.408 / 3.568 / 0.059

Place of the 1 PLA 1 0.606 11.135 1 0.287

Variable Symbols

FAM REL CAS EDU

male 31-4 1-

(xliii)

Coefficient

-0.413 0.343 0.713 -0.389

Conslarll -2 Log likely hood CoxBiSnell R square I I

Wald

0.398 1.009 2.019

-10.170 / -10.170 144.755

N g l k e r R square 1 0.165

Significance

0.528 0.3 15 0.155

3.001 1 0.083

4.677 0.03 1

0.033 I

female Education of mak I HEDU 1 -0.030 / 0.081 1 0.776 Occuwion of 1 OCCF / -0.121 I 2.597 10.107

(xliv)

I male 37-4 I- C O ~ I ~ M ~ -2 Log likely hood Cox&Snell R

Lsquarc

- 1.862 508.413 0.026

[Nngelkcr R square I 0.052 I I

-1.862

I

3.095 0.079

Table - 9. Opinion about pndce of famlly planning agaiwt their religion (OP19) Variabks description

respondent Family Type Religion Caste Education of female Education of male Occupation of

Place of the 1 PLA 1 -0.703 / 8.501 1 0.004

FAM REL C AS EDU

female Occupation of male Income of the

Squarc Nagelkcr R square 1 0.655

Variable Symbols

HEDU OCCF

male3141 Constant -2 Log likely hood CoxBrSnell R

(xlvi)

Coefficient Wald

0.084 -3.003 -0.450 0.068

OCCM

FlNC

Significance

-0.024 -0.1 15

7.135 539.556 0.491

0.092 219.934 4.402 0.366

0.146

0.000

0.762 0.000 0.036 0.545

0.042 1.963

42.155

0.837 0.161

2.810

8.464

0.000

0.094

0.004

Table - 10. Large family mans better aecurity in old age (OPIIO) Variables description Place of the respondent Family Type Religion Caste Education of

female Occupation of / OCCM / -0.086 1 2.1 57 10.142

female Education of male Occupation of

male Income of the / FlNC 1 0.000 / 0.096 1 0.757

Variable Symbols PLA

F AM REL CAS EDU

HEDU OCCF

Coefficient

-0.504

-0.210 -0.545 -0.037 0.040

square I

0.1 14 -0.066

I I

Wald

9.772

1.366 28.103 0.062 0.262

. Nagelker R square / 0.133

Significance

0.002

0.242 0.000 0.803 0.609

1.993 1.279

0.158 0.258

APPENDIX IV

EXPLANATION FOR TERMS USED IN THE THESIS

Contraception: In human physiology, birth control through the deliberate prevention of

conception or impregnation.

Sterilihtion: Simple operation. In female's sterilization results from tubal ligation- the

blocking or severing of the fallopian tubes

Still birth: in human, respectively, any birch that occurs significantly before or after expected

day of delivery.

Fertility: The fertility is defined as the actual reproductive performance of an individual, a

couple, a group, or a population.

Aaily phoning: Family Planning is the conscious effort of couples to regulate the number

and spacing of binhs through artificial and natural methods of conbaception. Family

planning connotes conception control to avoid pregnancy and abortion, but it also

includes effons of couples to induce pregnancy.

(xlviii)

APPENDIX-I

V.1 REGRESSION MODELS FOR SOCIAL FACTORS DETERMINING FERTILITY AMONG ADOPTER

V.2 REGRESSION MODELS FOR SOCIAL FACTORS DETERMINING FERTILITY AMONG NON ADOFTER

N.(k F i r e in UK h k e l indicates?' YBIUCI, r t f~15 one pa-t significml level, ** and *** ref- five pnant and 10 -1 signifie

TABLE-V.2

SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS DETERMlNlNG FERTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF WOMEN AMONG NON -ADOPTER OF FAMILY PLANNING METHOD

I I I I I I I I (iv)

FACTORS DETERMINING FERTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF WOMEN AMONG ADOPTER AND NON ADOPTER OF FAMILY PLANNING METHOD ACROSS

RELIGIOUS CROUPS

Fertility = Total number of living children x 100 Difference between Marriage age and present age

This fertility is taken as dependent variable and other socio-economic factors such as Place of the respondent. Family Type, House type, Electrification, Water facility, Structure o f house, Present age of female, Present age of male house, Religion, Caste, Occupation of female, Occupation of male husband, Family monthly income, Family monthly expenditure, Marriage age of female, Marriage age of male, Age at permanent method of female Age at temporary method of female, Complaint about using of family planning method, Body condition of female, Son preference, College level education of female, School level education of male, College level education of male. Incentives received, Age of last child is taken as independent variable. Simple multiple linear regression tahniques adopted in order to find out facton determining fertility of women

Age a1 temporary method of 1 AGETEM 1 -0.065 1 (-0.895) female Complaint about using of family planning method Body condition of female Son preference School level education of

male I I j College level education of I HEDUD2 1 0.320 / (0.082)

female College level education of female School level education of

Incentives received 0.1 15

R -VALUES 0.507 0.480

F-values 18.725

COMP

COND SON EDUDl

N#d: Figu~e in Ihe brick indiwles'l' values, refasom prcenl significant level. *' Md *" re fa five pucat and 10 p ~ ~ ~ t m sipificant level m p t ~ ~ l v ~ l y .

1 0.487 (2.355)"

I

-1.504. / (-2.026)** -0.198 : (-0.122) -3.490 1 (-1.461)

EDUDZ

HEDUDl

(viii)

-1.607 (-0.803) I

3.291 1 (0.91 1)