17
ANTEWORTA

ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

ANTEWORTA

Page 2: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

Antworta seeks for an answer.

Who I would be if I was not me?

Page 3: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

AntewortaHas an Identity

Crisis

According to a japanish buddist quote:Crisis is either panic or opportunity.

Anteworta choose

PANIC

Page 4: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

Anteworta is convinced that

IDENTITY IS CONSTRUCTED

Page 5: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

Anteworta states thatIn order to meet the real Self you need

constantly construct and deconstructYour Identity.

Page 6: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

The real self is what you haven't discovered yet.

Freud Ideal Ego Ego ideal Superego

Lacan The small Other The big Other The Real

Page 7: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

ANTE

Moves and Actswithin the realms of

SymbolicImaginary

Real

Page 8: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

AntewortAACCEPTS the Existence of the big Other.

but USES the Existence of the big Other.

NEEDs the big Other in order to play the GAME

According to Zizek's lacanian point of view,

There is the big Other who directs and controlls the acts of individuals

and can be personified or reified in a signle agent: The “GOD”.

But although its power, the big Other exists in so far as subjects acts as if it exists

SO.... Anteworta isThe pregnant“Anti-God”

Page 9: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

Anteworta decided that this is a game.

A symbolic game.An imaginary game.

A real game.A cruel game.

A game of the past.A game of the here and now.

A game of construction.A game of deconstruction.A game of transformation.

Page 10: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

A GAME

between

Antworta- the big Other

Me-me

Me-You

Reality- “reality”

Page 11: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

THE GAME EXISTS to give birth to a new form of

Life: “Hybrid-Me”

Page 12: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

Anteworta

Is everyday pregnant

Page 13: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

Anteworta supports and is supported by:

The sociopath> The subject uses languages, is is not caugth up in it, and it is insensitive to the performative dimension. It is able to discern the moral rules that regulate social interaction, and even to act morally in so far as he establishes that ot suits its purposes. It lacks the “gut feeling” or write and wrong and claims that morality is a theory one learns and follows.” (Zizek, p.14)

The obsessional neurotic>The subject is frantically active in order to prevent the real thing from happening. It talks constantly with anecdotes, dreams, insights. Incessant activity.( Zizek,p.26)

The hysteric> The subject questions or feel discomfort in its symbolic identity. “Why am I what you are saying that I am?”. It is historically determined , dependent upon a specific ideological context. (Zizek, p.35)

The homo sacer>The subject lives into the position of living dead. It is legally dead, while biologically still alive. The persone who is transformed into a wolf and a wolf who is transformed into a person – in other words, a bandit. (Agamben, Homo sacer)

Page 14: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

Anterworta's weapon:Fantasy

Zizek claims that in opposition to the opposite elements of dream and reality, fantasy is closer to the reality. Fantasy is considered as a screen that protects us from the encounter with the Real. Fantasy appears as the answer to the question “che vuoi?” and to the enigma of the desire of the Other. 

Fantasy is “the

imagined scenario

representing the

realization of the

desire”.

Lacan

Page 15: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

“Unknown Knows”.There are unknown knows. This means that there are things that we don´t know that we know. (Zizek).

BADIOU claims that the truth does not exist because if the truth existed, there would be a definitive ecstatic dance, a mystical incantation of the event.

Anteworta wants to investigate and find which are these “unknown knows” and how are depicted to the hybrid body.

Anteworta believes in a truth that exists. A truth that cannot be seen and perceived by the human beings. The secret of the truth is hidden inside the “Hybrid- Me”

Page 16: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

Hybrid's Past

Anteworta adapts the genealogical methodology.

Genealogists begin their research by collecting family documents and stories. This creates a foundation for documentary research, which involves examining and evaluating historical records for evidence about ancestors and other relatives, their kinship ties, and the events that occurred in their lives. As a rule, genealogists begin with the present and work backward in time. Historical, social, and family context is essential to achieving correct identification of individuals and relationships.

Page 17: ANTEWORTA. Antworta seeks for an answer. Who I would be if I was not me?

ANTEWORTA SAYS No to Description

No to one Aesthetic.

No to satisfaction

No to one solution

Yes to risk.

Yes to constant transformation

Yes to panic

Yes to failure

Yes to limits

No to truths

Yes to other's desires

Yes to schizofrenia

Yes to hysteria

Yes to crisis

Yes to collaboration of opposote sides

Yes to creation

Yes to destruction

Yes to monsters

Yes to beauty

No to beauty

No to gifts

Yes to confusion

Yes to natural birth and no to caesarian