Upload
trinhnguyet
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2
Conway Board of
Education 2013
Ms. Susan McNabb
Mr. Bill Clements
Mr. Chuck Shipp
Mr. Carl Barger
Dr. Adam Lamey
Dr. Quentin Washispack
Mr. Andre’ Acklin
3
*Targeted Achievement Gap Group (TAGG):
Students at risk due to economic disadvantage,
English Learner (EL) status or Students with
Disabilities (SWD) .
The U.S. Department of Education staff reviewed and
approved Arkansas’s “ESEA Flexibility Accountability
Addendum." The addendum provides comprehensive
information regarding the Arkansas’s system of
differentiated recognition, accountability and support. It
outlines the process for determining status of schools and
districts based on expected performance gains for
student achievement and the secondary indicators.
ESEA Flexibility was approved by the U.S. Department
of Education in 2012 and was amended July 10, 2013.
4 4
2013 Arkansas ESEA Accountability Preliminary Classifications
• Conway School District: Needs Improvement District (Literacy and Math)
• Conway High School: Needs Improvement School (Literacy and Math)
• Conway Junior High School: Needs Improvement School (Literacy and Math)
• Bob Courtway Middle School: Needs Improvement School (Math)
• Carl Stuart Middle School: Needs Improvement School (Math)
• Ruth Doyle Middle School: Needs Improvement School (Literacy and Math)
• Raymond and Phyllis Simon Middle School: Needs Improvement School (Math)
• Ellen Smith Elementary: Achieving School
• Florence Mattison Elementary: Needs Improvement School (Math)
• Jim Stone Elementary: Achieving School
• Julia Lee Moore Elementary: Needs Improvement School (Literacy and Math)
• Marguerite Vann Elementary: Needs Improvement School (Literacy and Math)
• Theodore Jones Elementary: Needs Improvement School (Math)
• Woodrow Cummins Elementary: Needs Improvement School (Math)
• Ida Burns Elementary: Needs Improvement School (Literacy and Math)
5
Arkansas
State Average
GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8
MATH 86 82 70 76 70 66
LITERACY 80 85 84 73 77 78
90 92
79 84 85
74
86 92 89
79 86
80
0
20
40
60
80
100
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Conway School District Averages by Grade on the 2013 Augmented Benchmark Exams
(Combined Populations)
Math Literacy
6
Conway
School
District
Total Number
Attempting
Literacy,
Year 2013
Percent Proficient
in Literacy,
Year 2013
Year 2013
AMO
All Students 4892 83.34 85.21
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 2507 71.24 74.51
African American 1260 71.51 73.18
Hispanic 364 75.00 80.27
Caucasian 3012 89.91 90.45
Economically
Disadvantaged 2323 73.35 76.18
English Learners 226 63.72 71.68
Students with
Disabilities 589 36.33 46.15
7
Conway
School
District
Total Number
Attempting Math,
Year 2013
Percent Proficient
in Math,
Year 2013
Year 2013
AMO
All Students 5193 82.67 90.76
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group
2655 70.55 83.39
African American 1264 67.33 81.95
Hispanic 378 74.87 87.89
Caucasian 2932 88.85 94.31
Economically
Disadvantaged
2481 72.27 84.33
English Learners 238 68.49 84.41
Students with
Disabilities
614 39.09 68.46
8
Results of 2013 Norm Referenced Tests Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) and
Iowa Tests of Educational Development (ITED)
8
Combined
Population
Grade
Mathematics - NRT
Percentile Rank of
Average Standard
Score
Reading
NRT
Percentile Rank of
Average Standard Score
1 62 59
2 70 69
9 54 60
9
End of Course Exams 2013 -- Percent Advanced/Proficient
77
90
70
75
80
85
90
95
State Average Conway
Algebra I Exam
70
78
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
State Average Conway
Literacy 11 Exam
44
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
State Average Conway
Biology Exam
75
82
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
State Average Conway
Geometry Exam
10
The achievement gap increased.
Note: Subpopulations of fewer than 25 students are not indicated.
73 83
78
89 91
74
92 93 92
0102030405060708090
100
2011 2012 2013
Conway School District Gr. 3 Literacy Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
11
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
2011 2012 2013
88
80 80
92 92
85
96 95 95
Conway School District Gr. 3 Math Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap increased. Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
12
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
2011 2012 2013
85
88 88
91
93
89
93
95 95
Conway School District Gr. 4 Literacy Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap increased. Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
13
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
2011 2012 2013
83 80
83
91 92 89
96 95 95
Conway School District Gr. 4 Math Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap decreased.
Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
14
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013
74
88
77 79
89 93 91 94 93
Conway School District Gr. 5 Literacy Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap increased.
Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
15
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013
81 75
56
84 94
70
94 94 88
Conway School District Gr. 5 Math Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap increased. Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
16
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013
70 73 65
73 78
69
84 93
89
Conway School District Gr. 6 Literacy Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap increased. Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
17
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013
84 78
71
90 81
87 92 94 90
Conway School District Gr. 6 Math Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap increased. Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
18
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013
62
87 77
64
78
64
82 92 92
Conway School District Gr. 7 Literacy Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap increased.
Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
19
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013
79 75 74 80 78
62
91 93 91
Conway School District Gr. 7 Math Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap increased.
Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013
69
83
70
83 87
71
89 94
84
Conway School District Gr. 8 Literacy Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap increased. Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
21
0
20
40
60
80
100
2011 2012 2013
61 63 54
83 82
52
89 91 84
Conway School District Gr. 8 Math Trends on Augmented Benchmark Exams
African American Hispanic White
The achievement gap increased. Note: Subpopulations of less than 25 students are not indicated.
23
IDA BURNS
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
(K-4)
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013
Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
Literacy
All Students 87.50 88.09 69.44 91.29
Targeted Achievement Gap
Group 82.65 84.53
62.50
87.32
Mathematics
All Students 91.91 96.24 55.56 77.94
Targeted Achievement Gap
Group 88.78 94.84 62.50 76.95
24
ELLEN SMITH
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
(K-4)
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013
Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
Literacy
All Students 95.40 96.57 90.24 88.60
Targeted Achievement
Gap Group 89.19 90.20 88.24 87.74
Mathematics
All Students 94.25 97.85 60.98 64.41
Targeted Achievement
Gap Group 89.39 95.10 58.82 61.91
25 25
CARL STUART
MIDDLE SCHOOL
(5-7)
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013
Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
Literacy
All Students 87.54 86.43 85.81 86.61
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 73.31 71.28 73.44 71.18
Mathematics
All Students 87.56 91.03 76.87 89.36
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 74.38 76.72 59.77 75.35
26
CONWAY JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL (8-9)
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013
Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
Literacy
All Students 78.82 85.21 81.44 86.75
Targeted Achievement
Gap Group 62.88 74.51 66.32 78.62
Mathematics
All Students 81.44 90.76 75.92 85.11
Targeted Achievement
Gap Group 66.42 83.39
58.60
76.92
27 27
CONWAY HIGH SCHOOL
(10-12)
Literacy
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
All Students 76.95 78.23
Targeted Achievement Gap
Group 56.00 58.52
Mathematics
All Students 47.37 89.72
Targeted Achievement Gap
Group 19.05 82.82
Graduation Rate
All Students 85.62 81.89
Targeted Achievement Gap
Group
77.69 67.65
28
JULIA LEE MOORE
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
(K-4)
Literacy
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013
Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
All Students 85.71 92.84 78.18 94.71
Targeted Achievement
Gap Group 60.00 82.38 50.00 90.00
Mathematics
All Students 90.18 94.14 69.09 77.52
Targeted Achievement
Gap Group 72.50 85.58 44.44 66.67
29 29
JIM STONE
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
(K-4)
Literacy
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013
Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
All Students 91.67 95.48 89.89 95.49
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 80.00 85.82
82.35
91.23
Mathematics
All Students 91.11 96.99 68.54 84.23
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 79.45 91.13
61.76
78.07
30
MARGUERITE VANN
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
(K-4)
Literacy
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013 Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
All Students 82.93 90.40 90.00 95.43
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 76.19 81.71 86.36 94.79
Mathematics
All Students 84.76 88.89 51.43 73.74
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 79.81 79.68 47.73 66.15
31
FLORENCE
MATTISON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
(K-4)
Literacy
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013 Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
All Students 86.43 82.73 72.41 86.95
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 84.00 78.83 67.50 89.25
Mathematics
All Students 87.86 92.88 53.45 66.87
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 85.00 90.43 45.00 59.68
32
THEODORE JONES
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
(K-4)
Literacy
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013
Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
All Students 81.16 86.11 83.33 77.70
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 76.92 82.87
81.40
80.39
Mathematics
All Students 84.78 90.62 61.67 69.48
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 79.81 88.43 58.14 68.96
33
BOB COURTWAY
MIDDLE SCHOOL
(5-7)
Literacy
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013
Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
All Students 86.73 80.39 86.36 82.28
Targeted Achievement
Gap Group 80.38 72.66 79.84 75.03
Mathematics
All Students 82.38 86.33 74.16 85.79
Targeted Achievement
Gap Group 73.58 76.68 64.92 77.64
34
RUTH DOYLE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
(5-7)
Literacy
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013
Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
All Students 84.91 90.93 85.20 91.37
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 71.12 79.76 75.25 83.14
Mathematics
All Students 82.29 93.20 76.91 91.74
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 66.38 86.01 59.09 85.47
35
RAY/PHYLLIS SIMON
MIDDLE SCHOOL
(5-7)
Literacy
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013
Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
All Students 80.30 79.06 85.55 82.49
Targeted Achievement
Gap Group 68.18 71.08 76.14 76.38
Mathematics
All Students 78.61 90.13 73.41 87.19
Targeted Achievement
Gap Group 65.45 86.11 60.23 83.48
36
WOODROW
CUMMINS
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
(K-4)
Literacy
2013
Performance
Percentage
2013
AMO
2013 Growth
Percentage
2013
AMO
All Students 94.62 93.75 81.08 92.71
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 88.89 85.29 68.75 84.85
Mathematics
All Students 96.77 97.40 62.16 83.33
Targeted
Achievement Gap
Group 89.58 91.83 68.75 81.06
37
District Demographics
Number Percent
• White 6126 62.9
• African American 2698 27.7
• Hispanic 722 7.47
• Asian 150 1.54
• Native American 26 .27
• Hawaii/Pacific Islanders 12 .12
• Male 4939 50.74
• Female 4795 49.26
Oct. 1, 2013
38
2005 8642
2006 8774
2007 9002
2008 9144
2009 9084
2010 9256
2011 9432
2012 9633
2013 9734
Enrollment Pattern
39
Expulsions 0.1%
Weapons Incidents 0.2%
Staff Assaults 0
Student Assaults 0.1%
DISCIPLINE AND SAFETY Statistics from the Arkansas Research Center
The Conway School District has adopted
a Parental Involvement Plan.
40
Attendance Rate 96.2%
Dropout Rate (7-12) 2.8%
College Remediation Rate (Percent of freshmen who
would take remedial courses based on ACT scores in
math and English) 39.6%
Grade Inflation Rate (Actual grades in core classes
compared to corresponding subjects on ACT) 4.1%
Student Activities
Statistics from the Arkansas Research Center
Each of the Conway School District’s teachers, administrators, and classified school
employees have been provided with appropriate student discipline training.
Each school in the Conway School District has distributed student discipline policies to
parents.
No students transferred pursuant to the unsafe school provision of A.C.A. 6-15-432.
No students transferred pursuant to the Arkansas Opportunity Public School Choice Act of
2004 (A.C.A. 6-18-227).
All schools in the Conway School District were Accredited without citations (A.C.A. §6-11-105,
A.C.A. §25-15-200 et seq., and A.C.A. §6-15-207 (Act 1467 of 2003)
Percent of students eligible for free or reduced meals 50%
(2013-14)
Graduation Rates
(2012-2013)
All Students Graduation Rate 85.62
African American Graduation Rate 84.21
Hispanic Graduation Rate 66.67
Caucasian Graduation Rate 87.44
Economically Disadvantaged Graduation Rate 75.65
Limited English Proficient Graduation Rate 77.78
Students with a Disability Graduation Rate 83.75
41
42
Number of Students Retained at Grade 1 31
Percent of Students Retained at Grade 1 3.9
Number of Students Retained at Grade 2 5
Percent of Students Retained at Grade 2 .6
Number of Students Retained at Grade 3 5
Percent of Students Retained at Grade 3 .7
Number of Students Retained at Grade 4 0
Percent of Students Retained at Grade 4 0
Number of Students Retained at Grade 5 1
Percent of Students Retained at Grade 5 .1
Number of Students Retained at Grade 6 7
Percent of Students Retained at Grade 6 .1
Number of Students Retained at Grade 7 0
Percent of Students Retained at Grade 7 0
Number of Students Retained at Grade 8 0
Percent of Students Retained at Grade 8 0
Retention Arkansas Research Center-- Archive Reports Center -- School Performance Data Reports
43
Number of identified Gifted/Talented Students
12) 1087
Number of Students Taking AP courses 582
Number of AP Exams administered 997
Number of Exam Scores of 3, 4, and 5 327
Special Programs 2012-2013
45
National Merit
Semi-Finalists and Finalists
• 2003-2004 11 Semi-Finalists 10 Finalists
• 2004-2005 6 Semi-Finalists 5 Finalists
• 2005-2006 7 Semi-Finalists 6 Finalists
• 2006-2007 3 Semi-Finalists 3 Finalists
• 2007-2008 9 Semi-Finalists 8 Finalists
• 2008-2009 6 Semi-Finalists 5 Finalists
• 2009-2010 5 Semi-Finalists 5 Finalists
• 2010-2011 12 Semi-Finalists 10 Finalists
• 2011-2012 10 Semi-Finalists 9 Finalists
• 2012-2013 7 Semi-Finalists 5 Finalists
46
TEACHING STAFF October 1, 2013
Percent Completely Licensed
100%
Percent Requesting Certification Waivers
0
Percent with Bachelor's Degree
40.1%
Percent with Master's Degree
59.6%
Percent with Advanced Degree
.3%
47
TAXPAYER INVESTMENT
2012-13
District Total Mills Voted 38.1
District Expenditure Per Student $8642.87
District Average Teacher Salary $53,636.00
Administrative Expenditures $5,738,639.00
Extracurricular Expenditures $1,545,123.54
Instructional Expenditures $49,849,898.00
District Capital Expenditures $16,512,999.00
District Debt Service Expenditures $7,636,660.00
Total Expenditures $108,239,393.00
Debt Service Expenditures $7,636,660.00
48
School board members are required to receive annual school board
training, as outlined in ACA 6-13-629. Each school district is required to
document school board members' training, and report their training in the
district's annual public report.