Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    1/84

    ANNUAL REPORT OF AIR POLLUTION ANDSTONE CONSERVATION LABORATORY

    2010Published by

    Dy. Superintending Archaeological Chemist

    Archaeological Survey of India

    Air Pollution & Stone Conservation Laboratory

    Agra Fort, Agra

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    2/84

    Principal Contributor

    &Chief Editor

    P.C. GuptaDy. Superintending Archaeological Chemist

    Air Pollution Monitoring Team

    D. Benerjee, ASAC

    Abhilasha Singh, AAC

    Ravindra Pachar, AAC

    Stone Conservation Research Team

    B.P. Nauni, ASAC

    Akhilesh Bhadoriya, AAC

    Edited By

    Rohit Misra, AAC

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    3/84

    FOREWORD

    Present-day Agras fame rests entirely upon the presence of the Taj Mahal.

    However, the city is also home to a rich collection of lesser-known and seldom-

    visited Mughal monuments, many of which are situated on the Yamuna riverfront

    within a relatively short distance of each other.

    Deterioration of the cultural heritage as a result of pollution and other similar

    factors is still a real and topical issue. Though for Taj Mahal, Archeological Survey of

    India has established specific strategies and action plans for regular monitoring and

    long-term follow-up of conservation methods. For that, Ambient Air Quality

    Monitoring Station was established at Taj Mahal in 1981 for the monitoring and

    analysis of pollutants in the ambience air of Taj by Archeological Survey of India.

    But, round the clock monitoring of air pollutants and meteorological parameters

    throughout the year has been started since December 2000 as per the order of

    Honorable Supreme Court.

    This report presents air pollution data monitored during the year 2010. In the

    compilation of this report, the annual average values for the earlier years have also

    been incorporated with a view to enable the reader to have a full picture of the

    environmental scenario in the ambience of Taj Mahal.

    Place: Agra

    Date: P. C. Gupta

    Dy. Superintending Archaeological Chemist

    Archaeological Survey of India

    Air Pollution & Stone Conservation Laboratories

    Agra Fort, Agra

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    4/84

    Contents

    Section A:AIR QUALITY MONITORING WORK

    1. Introduction 1

    1.1. Cultural Heritage 1

    1.2. Pollution threats on Heritage Properties 1

    1.3. Taj Mahal and Its Conservation 4

    2. Meteorology 72.1. Meteorological parameters 7

    2.2. Wind Speed 9

    2.3. Wind Direction 10

    2.4. Relative Humidity 20

    2.5. Temperature 23

    2.6. Rain Fall 26

    3. Deposition of Particulate 27

    3.1. Dust pollution 29

    3.1.1. Dispersion Mechanism and Effect 29

    3.1.2. Dust Fall Measurement 30

    3.1.3. Dust Fall pollution 30

    3.2. Suspended Particulate Matter 40

    3.2.1. SPM at Taj mahal 41

    4. Gaseous Pollutants 44

    4.1. Oxides of Sulphure 45

    4.2. Oxides of Nitrogen 48

    5. Sulphation Rate at Taj mahal & Sikandra 51

    6. Current Scenario of Air Pollution at Taj Mahal 54

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    5/84

    Section B: STONE CONSERVATION RESEARCH WORK

    1. Introduction 56

    1.1. Setting Up of Stone Conservation Laboratory 57

    2. Research Work 58

    2.1. Petrographic Studies 58

    2.1.1. Samples 58

    2.1.2. Preparation of thin sections 59

    2.1.3. Petrographic description 59

    2.1.3.1. Inlayed Stones of Taj Mahal 59

    2.1.3.2. Stone Sample of Sun Temple, Konark 62

    3. Comprehensive Scientific Investigations on Itmad-Ud-Daulah 63

    3.1. Photo-documentation 63

    3.2. Weathering Problems 68

    3.3. Material Used 72

    3.4. Sample Collection 72

    3.5. Stereomicroscopic Studies 74

    3.6. TDS/Conductivity Measurement 77

    3.7. Insoluble Inorganic matter 77

    4. Present Status of Work 78

    Other Activities of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation laboratory 78

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    6/84

    1

    1. Introduction

    1.1 Cultural Heritage

    Culture is the evolution of human life in space and time. The monuments

    remnants of the human creation of all the times form the prints, the signs, the

    evidences, the strides of the human-beings progress within the time. Cultural values

    created by our ancestors, and represent every sphere of their activities, including:

    political, economic, cultural, industrial as well as their daily life. Cultural properties are

    an indispensable part of our world; from them we obtain information about the history,

    culture, ideas and technologies that we use as a basis for considering our present and

    future, our society and culture. Thus, monuments form an undivided entirety with time

    and place, with man, his surroundings and his history. These unique and

    unprecedented fingerprints of human civilization form the natural and cultural heritage of

    a place, of a country, of a people, the peculiar features of a nation which characterize its

    identity.

    The term heritagewas used for first time from experts in the early seventies, to

    declare all the human creation with artistic features, which have been delivered to us as

    hereditary asset, namely as heritage. In India we have a vast continuity of our cultural

    heritage. It ranges from wonderful monuments to manuscripts, sculptures, paintings,

    wood carvings etc.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    7/84

    2

    1.2 Pollution threats on Heritage Properties

    Cultural heritage is continuously undergoing numerical strains: anthropogenic

    and natural ones, from which the former can be anticipated, or prevented, whereas the

    latter not. The result of these strains is the deteriorationof all the materials. In fact, there

    is no material which is not to be downgraded.

    Of the many types of cultural properties, the tangible cultural properties -

    buildings, handicrafts, paintings, statues, ancient documents, antiquities, materials of

    folk history and so on - are made of a variety of materials including metal, stone, wood,

    textiles, paper and leather, or a combination of these materials. With the passage of

    time and the effect of external factors such as the formation of mold, insect attack,

    changes in temperature and humidity, ultraviolet rays and so on, materials will

    deteriorate, gradually causing irreparable damages to the relic. This type of natural

    deterioration of cultural properties can be prevented using traditional repair techniques

    and through the application of chemical preservatives such as synthetic resins.

    Therefore, cultural properties can be restored and protected in most circumstances.

    However, in recent years the deterioration of cultural properties caused by

    different forms of atmospheric pollution has become a serious problem. Various

    atmospheric pollutants cause the corrosion, fading, discoloring or deterioration of the

    materials from which these cultural properties are made. Atmospheric pollution

    penetrates into many places and has an adverse affect on many types of cultural

    properties. Now, more than ever, these cultural properties are in danger of destruction.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    8/84

    3

    Pollution of the natural environment is largely unintended and unwanted

    consequences of human activities in manufacturing, transportation, agriculture and

    waste disposal. High levels of pollution are largely a consequence of industrialization,

    urbanization and the rapid increase of human population in modern times. Pollutants

    are commonly classified according to the part of the environment primarily effected by

    them, either by air, water or land. Sub-grouping depends on characteristics of the

    pollutants themselves: chemical, physical, thermal and others. Many pollutants affect

    more than one resource. The substances that pollute the atmosphere are either gases,

    finely divided soils, or finely dispersed liquids aerosols. Five major classes of pollutants

    are discharged into the air: carbon monoxide, sulphur oxides, hydrocarbons, nitrogen

    oxides and particulates (dust, ash). Air pollution as an anthropogenic reason for

    materials deterioration forms a problem of a great importance, because it has

    catastrophic consequences, universally, in health, in the environment and in the cultural

    heritage monuments and artifacts.

    The resistance of stone to the weathering agents, natural or artificial is not linear

    and the stone once depleted becomes much more prone to the action of pollutants. The

    weathering behavior further becomes more complex in case of deposition of air borne

    particulate contaminated with acidic gases and traces of heavy metals. The deposited

    particulate matter which is not only aesthetically detractive but also hides decay, aging

    forms a hard crust on stone surface, the carved surface and the niches that provide

    better sink to the particulate and do not receive direct rain lashes are indicative of the

    problem due to high levels of S.P.M. In such cases it is essential to carry out active

    conservation measures by way of removing the accretion deposits and improving the

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    9/84

    4

    surface resistance to the weathering action either by action of some polymeric coat or

    by improving the surface characteristics. The active conservation measures using the

    appropriate method, developed and evaluated in the laboratory, have yielded very

    encouraging results in case of the Taj mausoleum.

    The principle source of air pollution is the burning of fossil fuels, e.g., coal, oil and

    derivatives of the latter, such as gasoline, in internal combustion engines or for heating

    or industrial purposes. Once released into the atmosphere organic and inorganic

    pollutants undergo a variety of complex interaction determined by physical and chemical

    processes. Again, photochemical processes also play a role on organic and inorganic

    pollutants. In these phenomena the atmospheric chemistry of a region and air quality

    trends do not show a uniform trend due to the obvious role of complex photochemical

    reactions coupled with related chemical reactions.

    1.3 Taj Mahal and Its Conservation

    There has been a long tradition in and awareness of the importance of cultural

    heritage, especially immovable heritage, at the national level, in particular related to the

    protection and restoration of architectural heritage like Taj Mahal. Indeed for many

    centuries, there has been awareness of the importance of preserving built heritage, but

    this idea of restoration really crystallized in the 19th century, these ideas being put into

    practice.

    Atmospheric pollutants and its relationship with heritage conservation are one of

    the most important issues which concern us today. Asian countries possess the largest

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    10/84

    5

    legacy of monuments and thus have a great potential for conservation measures as well

    as heritage and culture issues. To further this concern technologist and archaeologist

    the world over are interested in the healthy keep up monuments.

    The Taj Mahal is a world heritage site, located in a predominantly agricultural

    landscape, dotted with small lime kilns burning high-sulfur coals, and in an environment

    conducive to frequent heavy dewfall. The construction is almost entirely of marble and

    other decorative stones. The prospect of pollution-related damage to the Taj Mahal is of

    considerable social and economic concern, and has generated a number of programs to

    document pollution-related decay and to identify specific cause of observed damage.

    Agra (2710N, 7805E) is located in north central India 200 km southeast of

    Delhi. Two-thirds of its peripheral boundaries (SE, W and NW) are bounded by the

    Rajasthan desert. The soil type is a mixture of sand and loam, containing excess of

    salts. The city is about 169 m above the MSL and has semi-arid climate with

    atmospheric temperature ranging between 11 to 48C (max.) and 0.7 to 30C (min.),

    relative humidity between 25 95%, and average rainfall of about 650 mm per year. The

    climate of Agra has been broadly divided into three seasons: winter (November to

    February), summer (March to June) and monsoon (July to October). The prevailing

    directions follow two distinct patterns: during monsoon winds are from W, NW, SW and

    NE Sector, while during the rest of the seasons they are from W and NW sector.

    The 10,400 sq km region covered under the TTZ has been categorized as a

    sensitive zone because of the existence of many world Heritage Sites. Some important

    urban centers, which come under the Taj Trapezium Zone, include Agra, Firozabad,

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    11/84

    6

    Mathura, Bharatpur, Jalesar and Hathras. These are the primary growth centers of the

    region. They influence not only the regional economy but also the environment. The

    region is most fertile in the country. Besides the Taj Mahal, the TTZ includes two other

    world heritage monuments the Agra Fort and Fatehpur Sikri. About two million

    tourists visit Agra every year, making it a major source of revenue and foreign exchange

    for the region. However, continuously rising environmental pollution has been the cause

    of concern for the protection of Taj marble.

    Over last few decades, the damage caused to the Taj Mahal by the pollution

    created by various industrial, commercial and residential activities surrounding it has

    been prompting the government of India, courts, activist groups and various donor

    agencies to raise awareness about the threat and to develop programs to protect the

    monument. In 1979, the Government of India (GOI) constituted a High Power

    Committee (HPC) to protect the Taj Mahal monument from chemical corrosion and

    degradation. Thereafter, no polluting industry was allowed to establish or expand in

    Agra. Subsequently, there had been many environmental interventions. They include

    installation of air pollution control units by 173 industries (out of 265) by 1994 and some

    others especially between 1996 and 2000 have resulted in overall improvement in

    environmental quality of Agra city during that period.

    The Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Station was established at Taj Mahal in 1981

    for the monitoring and analysis of pollutants in the ambience air of Taj by Archeological

    Survey of India. But, round the clock monitoring of air pollutants and meteorological

    parameters throughout the year has been started since December 2000 as per the

    order of Honorable Supreme Court.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    12/84

    7

    2. Meteorology

    The beginnings of meteorology can be traced back to ancient India, as the

    Upanishads contain serious discussion about the processes of cloud formation and rain

    and the seasonal cycles caused by the movement of Earth around the sun.

    Varahamihiras classical work Brihatsamhita, written about 500 A.D., provides clear

    evidence that a deep knowledge of atmospheric processes existed even in those times.

    The atmospheric conditions determine the behavior of pollutants after they leave

    the source or sources until they reach receptors, Such as people, animals, plants and

    buildings. Therefore, knowledge of meteorological and characteristics of a study area

    are of utmost importance. Transport and diffusion of the pollutants to atmosphere is

    governed by Meteorological factors. Meteorology study may be classified under macro

    and micro meteorological heads. Micrometeorology meaning study of minute variations

    in atmospheric conditions confined to an area of a few square kilometers and up to an

    elevation of 500 to 1000 meters in the atmosphere governs the transmission and

    diffusion of air pollutants.

    2.1 Meteorological Parameters

    These have been grouped under two heads viz the primary and the secondary.

    Amongst the primary meteorological parameters are wind speed, wind direction and

    atmospheric stability. The secondary factors include ambient temperature, humidity,

    precipitation, solar radiation, pressure and visibility. The primary factors are responsible

    for the dispersion and dilution, whereas secondary factors first affect the primary

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    13/84

    8

    parameters thus altering transmission of air pollutants. This grouping of primary and

    secondary parameters will also depend on particulate study and/or site. For example for

    site affected by smog, solar radiation may be taken as primary parameter.

    The wind direction is another important factor as the affect of emissions at a

    particular area is dependent upon the direction of wind from the source. Even in our

    most polluted cities where there are heavy industries, there are frequent periods when

    the atmospheric air is quite clear and transparent. These frequent fluctuations are not

    caused by gross changes in the emission of local pollutants but rather are a function of

    variation in the meteorological conditions.

    A numerical scale for the estimation of wind force/speed and its effect on

    common object is given below

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    14/84

    9

    2.2 Wind Speed

    This is very important determines the rates of dilution and transport of air

    pollutants. The travel time is important in that, it determines the amount of time; the

    pollution is exposed to the above meteorological factors before coming into contact with

    receptors.

    The second effect of wind speed is on dilution of the pollutant in the down wind

    direction. The dilution of air pollutants released from a source is directly proportional to

    wind speed or the down wind concentration of air pollutants is inversely proportional to

    wind speed.

    Wind speed is affected by a number of factors and situations, operating on

    varying scales (from micro to macro scales). These include the pressure gradient,

    Rossby waves and jet streams, and local weather conditions. There are also links to be

    found between wind speed and wind direction, notably with the pressure gradient and

    surfaces over which the air is found.

    The wind speed in the ambience of Taj is being measured with wind monitor

    WM-271 on hourly basis. The wind rose diagram obtained from wind monitor provides

    information about monthly average wind speed (in wind speed ranges of 1.6 Km/h, 5.0

    Km/h, 12.0 Km/h, 20.0 Km/h, 29.0 Km/h & above 29.0 Km/h)

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    15/84

    10

    2.3 Wind Direction

    The wind direction will have an important influence on the expected weather. You

    can often be given a wind direction and you will have a pretty good idea of how the

    weather will change and what weather can be expected with that wind direction.

    The typical wind direction that a location has for a certain time of the year is

    called the prevailing wind. When the wind is from the prevailing direction then the

    weather is generally typical. When the wind shifts away from the prevailing direction

    then it often indicates atypical or changing weather.

    The wind direction in the ambience of Taj is being measured with wind monitor

    WM-271 on hourly basis. The wind rose diagram obtained from wind monitor provides

    information about percent wind direction (in 16 components as E, EN-E, N-E, NN-E, N,

    NN-W, N-W, WN-W, W, WS-W, S-W, SS-W, S, SS-E, S-E, ES-S). Turbulence and flow

    of wind primarily govern the dispersion of pollutants emitted from the source.

    The data related to all the 16 components of wind direction have been compiled

    in Table 2.1 & 2.2 and their graphical representation is given in wind rose diagrams.

    During the year 2010 the wind rose diagram has been drawn in respect of wind speed

    and wind direction through the wind monitor WM 271.

    During the year 2010, the wind predominantly blew from North west, West north-

    west, West & West south-west directions to South east, East south-east, East & East

    north-east directions respectively.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    16/84

    11

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    17/84

    12

    Table 2.1: Wind Direction (Percent Average Component) For the Year 2010

    WindDirection/

    MonthE EN-E N-E NN-E N NN-W N-W WN-W

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    4.17

    4.35

    5.80

    1.94

    6.89

    4.89

    19.4

    14.3

    9.17

    9.23

    3.88

    0.68

    2.78

    3.11

    3.72

    1.79

    3.03

    4.17

    6.02

    4.72

    3.49

    2.86

    1.87

    1.37

    5.98

    3.42

    2.90

    2.69

    5.79

    4.17

    6.02

    4.72

    2.76

    4.61

    1.43

    3.44

    4.03

    2.64

    0.96

    1.64

    3.72

    4.02

    4.93

    1.11

    5.53

    1.75

    1.58

    1.37

    1.66

    1.71

    1.51

    2.24

    3.31

    3.45

    1.91

    0.69

    4.07

    1.27

    1.43

    2.06

    3.19

    3.26

    4.55

    1.64

    7.03

    7.19

    2.32

    0.97

    6.40

    4.14

    4.31

    5.24

    6.67

    9.79

    9.25

    5.23

    6.48

    6.47

    2.32

    0.97

    4.36

    8.43

    4.02

    6.48

    6.25

    6.37

    7.87

    14.0

    6.20

    10.2

    1.23

    1.52

    7.27

    10.1

    5.46

    7.44

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    18/84

    13

    Table 2.2: WIND DIRECTION (PERCENT AVERAGE COMPONENT) FOR THE YEAR2010

    WindDirection/

    MonthW WS-W S-W SS-W S SS-E S-E ES-E Calm

    Air

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    6.25

    14.1

    17.8

    19.9

    8.13

    14.9

    3.01

    3.05

    6.40

    6.68

    13.2

    11.3

    4.45

    6.53

    8.01

    18.2

    5.51

    11.9

    4.10

    6.25

    9.60

    4.93

    6.90

    6.89

    0.55

    2.64

    1.65

    6.88

    0.41

    3.02

    0.13

    2.08

    3.49

    0.79

    1.58

    1.51

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.14

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.29

    0.0

    0.0

    0.13

    0.13

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.13

    0.27

    0.31

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.28

    0.54

    0.13

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.31

    0.0

    0.14

    1.37

    0.43

    0.82

    0.97

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.55

    2.48

    1.38

    0.89

    13.9

    2.87

    14.7

    12.7

    4.22

    5.09

    1.15

    0.41

    53.12

    38.88

    34.60

    22.15

    28.13

    21.58

    32.19

    45.55

    33.18

    39.96

    53.09

    51.58

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    19/84

    14

    Monthly Wind-rose Diagram For the year 2010

    January 2010

    February 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    20/84

    15

    March 2010

    April 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    21/84

    16

    May 2010

    June 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    22/84

    17

    July 2010

    August 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    23/84

    18

    September 2010

    October 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    24/84

    19

    November 2010

    December 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    25/84

    20

    2.4 Relative humidity

    The measurement of humidity is of secondary importance in most air pollution

    studies. The hygrometric state of the atmosphere in terms of relative humidity is

    expressed as the ratio of the amount of water vapor present in the atmosphere to the

    amount of water required to saturate it at that temperature. The values are usually given

    as percent.

    The relative humidity in the immediate environment of the stone plays an

    important role in influencing the weathering action of various pollutants. The role of

    humidity are in aggravating, the rusting of iron dowels, leaching of cementing material

    and even allowing the action of SO2 through dry deposition. Though the porosity of the

    stone and the binding matrix are significant parameters which are responsible for

    weathering of stone, the ingress of water through cracks and crevices in case of stone

    having least porosity may cause more danger than stone having high porosity. In this

    context, the studies reported earlier show that humidity determination on various litho

    types have shown that in marble which has a very low porosity, humidity rapidly diffuses

    in the whole material. Sand stone having much high porosity than marble absorbs

    greater amount of water which however diffuses more slowly within the stone.

    Relative humidity has been recorded with wind monitor WM-271 on hourly basis.

    The data of relative humidity recorded in the ambience of Taj Mahal have been

    compiled in Table 2.3 & Figure 2.1.

    The maximum relative humidity was recorded as 100.0 % in the month of

    September & December. The minimum relative humidity was recorded as 5.0% in the

    month of April. The Maximum variation in relative humidity in a day was recorded as

    65.3% in the month of January & December. The Maximum monthly average variation

    in relative humidity was recorded as 46.0% in the month of February.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    26/84

    21

    Table 2.3: Relative Humidity at Taj Mahal for the year 2010

    Month Relative Humidity (%)Max. Min. Variation

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    99.5

    95.4

    81.2

    56.0

    91.0

    78.5

    99.0

    98.2

    100

    95.5

    99.0

    100

    30.2

    20.1

    8.0

    5.0

    14.3

    17.2

    39.1

    44.0

    34.1

    27.0

    32.1

    28.1

    69.3

    75.3

    73.2

    51

    76.7

    61.3

    59.9

    54.2

    65.9

    68.5

    66.9

    71.9

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    27/84

    22

    Figure 2.1: % Relative Humidity at Taj Mahal for the year 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    28/84

    23

    2.5 Temperature

    The maximum temperature in air pollution studies may be used to estimate the

    maximum mixing depth for the day if a temperature profile is available. In addition, the

    daily range of temperature may be used to calculate heating degree day values. The

    wide temperature fluctuations causing thermal movement in the building materials

    results in the decay process when experienced over longer periods. The temperature

    inversion retards the diffusion rate of air pollutants which ultimately results in direct or

    indirect interaction between building materials and air pollutants.

    Temperature has been recorded with wind monitor WM-271 on hourly basis. The

    data of atmospheric temperature recorded in the ambience of Taj Mahal has been

    compiled in Table 2.4 & Figure 2.2. The Maximum temperature was recorded as 45.40C

    in the month of May while minimum temperature was recorded as 6.20C in the month of

    January. The maximum variation in temperature in a day was recorded as 17.3 0C in the

    month of January. The maximum monthly average variation in temperature was

    recorded as 13.6 0C for the month of March.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    29/84

    24

    Table 2.4: Temprature at Taj Mahal for the year 2010

    Month Temperature (0C)Max. Min. Variation

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    28.3

    31.4

    40.1

    43.3

    45.4

    43.6

    39.1

    38.4

    35.3

    35.6

    31.6

    25.6

    6.2

    12.0

    16.2

    23.0

    22.2

    24.0

    24.2

    24.3

    22.2

    18.6

    15.0

    9.0

    22.1

    19.4

    23.9

    20.3

    23.2

    19.6

    14.9

    14.1

    13.1

    17

    16.6

    16.6

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    30/84

    25

    Figure 2.2: Temperature at Taj Mahal for the year 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    31/84

    26

    2.6 Rain Fall

    Rain is liquid precipitation, as opposed to non-liquid kinds of precipitation such as

    snow, hail and sleet. In meteorology, rainfall typescan include the character or phase of

    the precipitation which is falling to ground level. There are three distinct ways that rain

    can occur. These methods include convective, stratiform, and orographic rainfall.

    Convective precipitation is generally more intense, and of shorter duration, than

    stratiform precipitation. Precipitation can also fall in two phases, either liquid or solid.

    Liquid forms of precipitation include rain and drizzle. Rain or drizzle which freezes on

    contact within a subfreezing air mass gains the preceding word of freezing, becoming

    known as freezing rain or freezing drizzle. Frozen forms of precipitation include snow,

    ice needles, sleet, hail, and graupel. Precipitation intensity is determined either by rate

    of fall, or by visibility restriction.

    Rain fall is also measured with WM-271 on hourly basis. The intensity of rain

    largely influences the impact of acidic pollutants on calcareous stone. In case of stone

    which is exposed and regularly washed by rains, the accretion deposits along with the

    resultant products may be washed away.

    The maximum Rain fall was recorded as 247.00 mm in the month of September,

    where as the minimum rain fall was recorded as 4.00 mm in the month of January. It

    was also noticed that there was no rain during the month of March, April, October &

    December. The total rain fall during this year was recorded as 669.90 mm.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    32/84

    27

    3. Deposition of Particulates

    Particulate matter (PM) is the term used for a mixture of solid particles and liquid

    droplets suspended in the air. These particles originate from a variety of sources, such

    as power plants, industrial processes, and diesel trucks, and they are formed in the

    atmosphere by transformation of gaseous emissions. Their chemical and physical

    compositions are depending on location, time of year, and weather. Particulate matter

    is composed of both coarse and fine particles. Dispersion of particulates emitted

    from a stack differs from that of pollutant gases that settle toward the earths surface,

    they are not re-entrained in the atmosphere by the wind. Particles may also be removed

    by wash out and rain out and impaction on surface of trees, structures and other objects

    in contact with the air. The time of removal varies with particle size, height above the

    surface and the meteorological factors that transport the particles. Some particles are

    airborne only a very short time, (measured in seconds) while others remain airborne for

    long periods (upto years), such as the very small fall out ash injected into the

    stratosphere by nuclear explosions or the small dusts from the eruption of volcanoes.

    Impaction is quite important in the removal of small particles from the

    atmosphere, especially those particles small enough to prevent effective settling. These

    particles are also resistant to wash out. The velocity needed for impaction is given to the

    particles by air currents and for very small particles (0.2 m) by Brownian motion. The

    efficiency of removal depends upon the diameter of the particle, the characteristic length

    (diameter) of the impaction surface, and the relative velocity between the particle and

    the surface. The most effective impaction occurs when an aerosol is blown through tree

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    33/84

    28

    leaves and grass or weeds. Impactive removal of particles from the air causes the

    vertical and even the overhead surfaces of structures to become dirty.

    Particulate matter (dust) comes in great varieties of size, grain loading, shape,

    chemical composition, specific gravity, bulk density, friability, stickiness, resistivity,

    wettability, cohesiveness etc. Inview of these variables, different types of particulates

    have different meanings and the most common among them may be classified as

    follows:-

    Grit: Solid particles suspended in air with a diameter over 500 m.

    Dust: Solid particles suspended in air with a diameter between 0.25 m- 500 m.

    Smoke: Gas-borne solids with particles usually less than 2 m in diameter.

    Fumes: Suspended solids in air less than 1.0 m in diameter normally released from

    chemical or metallurgical processes.

    Mist: Liquid droplets suspended in air with a diameter of less than 2.0 m.

    Aerosols: Aerosols refer to solid or liquid particles of microscopic size (smoke, fog or

    mist). Broadly speaking Aerosols fall into four classifications: 1) Sprays; 2) Mists; 3)

    Dust; 4) Fumes. Liquid droplets suspended in air, greater than 10 m in size are defined

    as sprays, those less than 10 m as mists. Similarly submicron solid particles

    suspended in air are referred to as fumes and those greater than 1 m as dusts.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    34/84

    29

    3.1 Dust Pollution

    The Dust consists of particles in the atmosphere that arise from various sources

    such as soil dust lifted up by wind (an Aeolian process), volcanic eruptions, and

    pollution. Dust in homes, offices, and other human environments contains small

    amounts of plant pollen, human and animal hairs, textile fibers, paper fibers, minerals

    from outdoor soil, human skin cells, the remains of burnt meteors and many other

    materials which may be found in the local environment.

    3.1.1 Dispersion Mechanism and Effect

    The dust pollution may be due to natural blowing winds or emission from industries or

    other sources.

    The soil is easily picked up by the strong preventing winds. The coarser material is

    drifted along close to ground to be piled along fences, hedges, buildings and other

    obstacles. The finer dust being swept in to the air gives rise to blinding destructive dust

    storms. Blown sand acts as a powerful abrasive agent. The effect on rock surface is far

    greater if it is continuously exposed to natural sand blasting for a long period of time.

    Large solid particles with a diameter of over 50 m are collectively visible in the air and

    settle out fairly quickly so that they are not a long term pollution hazard. The grit and

    dust of the kind collected in gauges used for the measurement of deposited on the

    ground, on the roofs, window sills and other ledges of buildings and on other structures

    mostly within a few kilometers of the points of discharge into the air. The larger sizes

    over 10 m diameter fall near the sources of emission and the smaller particles are

    carried further before being deposited. Consequently, stone work and clay quarries,

    cement works, brick works often cause despoliation of the surrounding land. Dust fall

    particles because of their large size are offensive to the visual sense and constitute a

    nuisance.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    35/84

    30

    The abrasion due to soil particles depends on the size of the dust. The particles

    moving with blowing winds when strike with the stone surface, their kinetic energychanges to potential energy and that potential energy and that potential energy grooves

    the surface at striking point on continuous hammering.

    The grit, dust and smoke in thickly populated industrial areas are heavily

    contaminated with sticky soot and tarry matter. Such particles are often damp or wet

    with atmospheric moisture or rain; they readily stick to surfaces with which they come

    into contact and not easily removed. In addition, the particulate matter when moist or

    wet absorbs SO2 from the contaminated air and the oxide is converted to sulphurous

    and sulphuric acids. The affect of these acids is of chemical nature.

    3.1.2 Dust Fall Measurement

    The dust fall rate is measured by using standard recommended apparatus

    (Dust Fall Jar) by gravimetrically in the nearby atmosphere of Taj Mahal, Agra Fort and

    Sikandra on monthly basis. The values recorded for dust fall rate along with its pH,insoluble inorganic, organic and water soluble components.

    3.1.3 Dust Fall Pollution

    Dust fall rate was measured at Taj Mahal , Agra Fort and Sikandra and the data

    obtained have been compiled in Table 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 & 3.4 Figure 3.1 ,3.2, 3.3, 3.4 & 3.5.

    The maximum value of Dust fall rate at Taj Mahal, Agra Fort and Sikandra were

    measured as 12.19 MT/Km2 /month in the month of June, 14.36 MT/Km2 /month in the

    month of December, 9.08 MT/Km2 /month in the month of November respectively. The

    minimum value of Dust fall rate at Taj Mahal, Agra Fort and Sikandra were measured as

    2.99 MT/Km2 /month in the month of December, 2.14 MT/Km2 /month in the month of

    August, 3.25 MT/Km2/month in the month of December respectively.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    36/84

    31

    Table 3.1: Dust Fall rate (MT/Km2/Month) at Taj Mahal , Agra Fort & Sikandra forthe year 2010

    Month Taj Mahal Agra Fort Sikandra

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    7.68

    5.79

    7.16

    6.24

    11.65

    12.19

    8.78

    5.26

    6.41

    5.66

    8.97

    2.99

    6.31

    5.72

    6.50

    6.49

    8.50

    10.33

    5.52

    2.14

    2.24

    4.52

    7.59

    14.36

    3.38

    3.50

    6.56

    6.03

    6.52

    6.74

    6.31

    6.05

    3.61

    7.40

    9.08

    3.25

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    37/84

    32

    Figure 3.1: Dust Fall Rate (MT/Km2/Month) at Taj Mahal, Agra Fort & Sikandra for

    the year 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    38/84

    33

    Table 3.2: Dust fall rate and its components at Taj Mahal for the year 2010

    Month pH TotalInsolubleMatter (%)

    VolatileMatter

    (%)

    WaterSolubleDust (%)

    InsolubleInorganicMatter (%)

    TotalInorganicMatter (%)

    Dust Fall Rate(MT/Km

    2/month)

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    7.0

    7.0

    6.2

    7.7

    6.9

    7.5

    7.5

    6.9

    7.0

    7.2

    7.5

    7.7

    8.47

    18.70

    9.0

    22.10

    23.11

    16.11

    15.58

    24.65

    9.57

    17.28

    12.45

    31.27

    6.41

    18.05

    7.74

    20.41

    21.50

    14.05

    14.23

    23.90

    7.71

    16.08

    10.95

    28.52

    91.53

    81.30

    91.00

    77.90

    76.89

    83.89

    84.42

    75.35

    90.43

    82.72

    87.55

    68.73

    2.06

    0.65

    1.26

    1.69

    1.60

    2.06

    1.35

    0.75

    2.46

    1.20

    1.50

    2.75

    93.59

    81.95

    92.26

    79.59

    78.50

    85.95

    85.77

    76.10

    92.89

    83.92

    89.05

    71.48

    7.68

    5.79

    7.16

    6.24

    11.65

    12.19

    8.78

    5.26

    6.41

    5.66

    8.97

    2.99

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    39/84

    34

    Table 3.3: Dust fall rate and its components at Agra Fort for the year 2010

    Month pH TotalInsolubleMatter (%)

    VolatileMatter

    (%)

    WaterSolubleDust (%)

    InsolubleInorganicMatter (%)

    TotalInorganicMatter (%)

    Dust Fall Rate(MT/Km

    2/month)

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    7.0

    7.0

    6.8

    7.7

    7.5

    7.5

    7.7

    6.5

    6.5

    6.96

    6.80

    7.2

    12.83

    16.30

    10.70

    31.08

    23.35

    16.06

    29.24

    59.79

    24.80

    18.90

    13.78

    17.76

    9.51

    14.55

    8.44

    26.76

    20.36

    12.67

    21.53

    57.41

    19.32

    15.89

    12.70

    17.29

    87.17

    83.70

    89.30

    68.92

    76.65

    83.94

    70.76

    40.21

    75.20

    81.10

    86.22

    82.24

    3.32

    1.75

    2.26

    4.32

    2.99

    3.39

    7.69

    2.38

    5.48

    3.00

    1.08

    0.47

    90.49

    85.45

    91.56

    73.24

    79.64

    87.33

    78.47

    42.59

    80.68

    84.11

    87.30

    82.71

    6.31

    5.72

    6.50

    6.49

    8.50

    10.33

    5.52

    2.14

    2.24

    4.52

    7.59

    14.36

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    40/84

    35

    Table 3.4: Dust fall rate and its components at Sikandra for the year 2010

    Month pH TotalInsolubleMatter (%)

    VolatileMatter

    (%)

    WaterSolubleDust (%)

    InsolubleInorganicMatter (%)

    TotalInorganicMatter (%)

    Dust Fall Rate(MT/Km

    2/month)

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    6.5

    7.5

    6.0

    7.5

    7.2

    7.0

    7.2

    6.7

    6.8

    6.78

    7.20

    7.6

    7.54

    22.18

    7.07

    25.39

    26.63

    16.57

    23.77

    25.98

    13.75

    11.54

    13.52

    68.29

    4.69

    21.11

    4.57

    22.29

    24.98

    9.11

    44.84

    24.56

    10.19

    10.17

    12.43

    66.03

    92.46

    77.82

    91.21

    74.61

    73.37

    83.43

    76.23

    74.02

    86.25

    88.46

    86.48

    31.71

    2.85

    1.07

    2.50

    3.10

    1.65

    7.46

    1.35

    1.40

    3.56

    1.38

    1.09

    2.26

    95.31

    78.89

    95.43

    77.71

    75.02

    90.89

    77.57

    75.42

    89.81

    89.83

    87.57

    33.97

    3.38

    3.50

    6.56

    6.03

    6.52

    6.74

    6.31

    6.05

    3.61

    7.40

    9.08

    3.25

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    41/84

    36

    Figure 3.2: % Total Insoluble Matter at Taj Mahal, Agra Fort & Sikandra for the

    year 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    42/84

    37

    Figure 3.3: % Volatile Matter at Taj Mahal, Agra Fort & Sikandra for the year 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    43/84

    38

    Figure 3.4: % Water Soluble Matter at Taj Mahal, Agra Fort & Sikandra for the year

    2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    44/84

    39

    Figure 3.5: % Total Inorganic Matter at Taj Mahal, Agra Fort & Sikandra for the

    year 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    45/84

    40

    3.2 Suspended Particulate Matter

    Suspended particulate matter (SPM) in air generally is a complex, multi-phase

    system of all airborne solid and low vapor pressure liquid particles having aerodynamic

    particle sizes from below 0.01-100 m and larger.

    Particulate in a stack effluent may because of their differing physical properties,

    have motions different from the gaseous components. The greater mass density of

    particulates results in gravitational forces which cause a down ward component of

    motion. The effect of gravitational forces is generally identified by free-fall (settling,

    terminal) velocity of a particle in a motionless body of air. This depends on particle size,

    mass density and configuration as well as mass density and viscosity of the ambient air.

    The term particulate refers to all atmospheric substances that are not

    gaseous. They can be suspended droplets of solid particles or mixtures of two.

    Particulate can be composed of inert or extremely reactive materials ranging in the size

    from 100 m to 0.01m. The reactive material may further oxidize or may react

    chemically with the environment. Particulate of the size less than 10 m are termed as

    suspended particulate matter. Particulate from soils and minerals primarily contain

    calcium, aluminum and silicone compounds. Organic compounds are released into the

    atmosphere mainly by the processing and use of petroleum products. The damage

    caused by the pollutants is well known phenomenon. Particulate such as soot, dust and

    fumes damage painted surfaces, fabrics & buildings. Due to their abrasive nature,

    particulate can cause damage to exposed surfaces when they are driven by wind at

    high velocities.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    46/84

    41

    3.2.1 Suspended Particulate Matter at Taj Mahal

    At Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Station of Taj Mahal, the sampling of

    S.P.M. is being carried out on 8 hour bases on everyday of month by employing High

    Volume Sampler (HVS). The glass micro fiber filter paper has been used for the

    sampling of S.P.M.

    The data obtained have been compiled in Table 3.5 & Figure 3.6. The maximum

    concentration of S.P.M. for a day was estimated is 627.94 g/m3 in the month of

    November while minimum concentration for a day was estimated is 10.30 g/m3 in the

    month of September. The maximum monthly average concentration of S.P.M. was

    determined is 354.15g/m3 for the month of April while minimum monthly average

    concentration was determined is 50.94g/m3 for the month of August. The annual

    average concentration was calculated is 229.87g/m3, which is slightly decreased as

    compare to previous five consecutive years, i.e. 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 & 2009. As

    usual, it was observed that the monthly average concentration remained below the safe

    limit in the month of August & September while rain was occurred and then started

    increasing and finally estimated high during winter season i.e. in the month of

    December. The Thermal inversion and calm condition in atmosphere were responsible

    to increase the concentration of S.P.M. in ambient air at winter season.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    47/84

    42

    Table 3.5. Concentration of S.P.M. (g/m3) in the ambience of Taj Mahal for theyear 2010

    Month S.P.M. (g/m3)

    Max. Min. Avg.

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    304.82

    380.64

    436.39

    499.99

    569.85

    384.02

    315.80

    77.29

    250.27

    485.28

    627.94

    518.18

    135.15

    95.46

    224.75

    254.88

    159.35

    108.50

    35.93

    26.18

    10.30

    117.93

    79.92

    205.13

    210.12

    228.57

    311.99

    354.15

    303.18

    259.76

    101.54

    50.94

    81.61

    266.95

    288.05

    301.54

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    48/84

    43

    Figure 3.6: Concentration of SPM (g/m3) in the ambience of Taj Mahal for the

    year 2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    49/84

    44

    4. Gaseous Pollutant

    Gaseous pollutants consist of atoms, molecules and include harmful gases,

    which can freely mix with air without settling down. Some examples of gaseous

    pollutants of air are carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, sulphur dioxide, hydrogen

    sulphide, nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons. The gaseous pollutants which are directly

    released into the atmosphere as a result of direct anthropogenic activities are classified

    as primary pollutants. These are mostly the products of combustion of fossil fuels

    (carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen etc.), sulphurdioxide is produced during combustion of fossil fuels because such fuels always contain

    some amount of sulphur. This is an acidic gas and finally gets converted to sulphuric

    acid in the atmosphere which is responsible for the Acid Rain. Acid rain is particularly

    harmful for vegetation as well as heritage monuments because of their acidic nature. As

    an example, coal with 1.5 % sulphur by weight when burnt in a power station gives a

    flue gas containing between 2-3 gm-3 of oxides of sulphur or in the region of 0.1 % by

    volume. Among the oxides of sulphur, only SO2 and SO3 are of significant importance

    as gaseous air pollutants. Of the sulphur oxides, more than 95% by volume is SO2 and

    less than 5 % is SO3. In the atmosphere, SO2 gets oxidised to SO3 which in the

    presence of water forms sulphuric acid.

    The concentration of SO2 to be found in the atmosphere is governed not only by

    the number of size of local sources but by other factors such as stack height and

    meteorological parameters influencing the diffusion and dispersion pattern of gaseous

    pollutants.

    Another gaseous pollutant that is of significant destructive action is oxides of

    nitrogen (NOx). These are products of high temperature combustion of fossil fuels.

    Automobile emission is the main contribution of NOx in the urban atmosphere followed

    by emission of thermal power plants. NOx is primarily responsible for photochemical

    smog formation in the metropolitan areas.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    50/84

    45

    4.1 Oxides of Sulphur

    The most important oxide emitted by pollution sources is SO2. Sulphur dioxide is a

    colourless gas, moderately soluble in water and forms weakly acidic sulphurous acid. In

    a polluted atmosphere, SO2 reacts photo-chemically or catalytically with other pollutants

    or normal atmospheric constituents to form SO3, H2SO4 and salts of H2SO4. Sulphur

    dioxide is mostly responsible for metallic corrosion. Sulphuric acid mist in the

    atmosphere causes deterioration of structural materials such as marble and lime stone

    by forming precipitate of their constituents. Many priceless marble sculptures and

    buildings have suffered damage in the last 30 years or so as a result of increased

    concentration of SO2 in the atmosphere.

    Sulphur dioxide is monitored and analyzed by Modified West & Gaeke

    method using Sequential Air Sampler (SAS) on 4 h basis. Tetra chloro mercurate (TCM)

    is used as absorbing reagent for SO2. The concentration of SO2 is then measured

    through spectrophotometer at specific wavelength 560 nm.

    The data showing the concentration of SO2 in the ambience of Taj Mahal has been

    compiled in Table 4.1 & Figure 4.1. The maximum concentration of SO2 for a day was

    estimated as 9.03 g/m3 in the month of April while minimum concentration of SO2 for a

    day was estimated as 3.00 g/m3 in every month of the year. The maximum monthly

    average concentration was calculated as 4.60 g/m3 for the month of April while

    minimum monthly average concentration was calculated as 3.00 g/m3 for the month of

    July. The annual average concentration was calculated as 3.41g/m

    3

    . Both, monthlyaverage and annual average concentration were observed well below the safe limit

    prescribed for sensitive zone i.e. 30g/m3 and 15g/m3 respectively.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    51/84

    46

    Table 4.1. Concentration of SO2 (g/m3) in the ambience of Taj Mahal for the year

    2010

    Month SO2 Concentration (g/m3)

    Max. Min. Avg.

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    6.85

    4.37

    5.17

    9.03

    4.39

    4.19

    3.01

    3.29

    5.62

    3.90

    7.47

    7.71

    3.00

    3.00

    3.00

    3.00

    3.00

    3.00

    3.00

    3.00

    3.00

    3.00

    3.00

    3.00

    3.23

    3.26

    3.46

    4.60

    3.22

    3.08

    3.00

    3.03

    3.22

    3.13

    3.71

    3.93

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    52/84

    47

    Figure 4.1: Concentration of SO2 (g/m3) in the ambience of Taj Mahal for the year

    2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    53/84

    48

    4.2 Oxides of Nitrogen

    Out of seven oxides of nitrogen, only three N2O, NO & NO2 are formed in

    appreciable quantities in the atmosphere. NO& NO2 are analysed together in air and are

    referred as NOx. Nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere converts into nitrous and nitric acid

    in the presence of moisture. These acids impart corrosive effects on metal species. The

    CaCO3 content of marble on reaction with nitrogen acids converts into precipitate of

    calcium nitrate, thus causing deterioration on marble surfaces.

    NO2 is determined by Jacob & Hochneiser or Sodium-Arsenite method. Sampling

    of NO2 has also been carried out by Sequential Air Sampler on 4 h basis. Alkaline

    sodium arsenite solution is used as absorbing reagent. The concentration of oxides of

    Nitrogen is determined through spectrophotometer at specific wavelength 540 nm.

    The data showing the concentration of NO2 in the ambience of Taj Mahal has been

    compiled in Table 4.2 & Figure 4.2. The maximum concentration of NO2 for a day was

    estimated as 20.78 g/m3 in the month of November while minimum concentration of

    NO2 for a day was estimated as 3.00 g/m3 for the month of July. The maximum

    monthly average concentration was calculated as 13.42 g/m3 for the month of March

    while minimum monthly average concentration was calculated as 4.34 g/m3 for the

    month of July. The annual average concentration was calculated as 8.27 g/m3. In this

    year, monthly average and annual average concentration were observed below the safe

    limit prescribed for sensitive zone.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    54/84

    49

    Table 4.2. Concentration of NO2 (g/m3) in the ambience of Taj Mahal for the year

    2010

    Month NO2 Concentration (g/m3)

    Max. Min. Avg.

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    16.73

    11.83

    20.67

    13.73

    12.08

    9.34

    6.60

    12.51

    12.18

    17.22

    20.78

    18.84

    3.60

    3.64

    8.21

    3.98

    3.09

    3.17

    3.00

    3.93

    3.20

    3.67

    6.83

    7.21

    8.02

    6.64

    13.42

    7.90

    6.30

    5.75

    4.34

    7.64

    6.97

    8.04

    12.53

    11.64

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    55/84

    50

    Figure 4.2: Concentration of NO2 (g/m3) in the ambience of Taj Mahal for the year

    2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    56/84

    51

    5. Sulphation Rate at Taj Mahal & Sikandra

    Sulphation rate is referred as rate at which sulphur dioxide gets converted into

    sulphur trioxide in the atmosphere. Being a reactive species SO3 forms sulphuric acid

    under favorable conditions. The formation of such kind of acid mist or sulphate bearing

    particulate when strikes with the monuments and building results in erosion and

    corrosion of the surface. A glass test tube having a area of 100 cm2 is wrapped with a

    cotton gauge soaked in a solution of weighed quantity of lead dioxide in gum

    tragacanth. The test tube is kept in open atmosphere for one month. Lead dioxide

    reacts with SO3 present in the atmosphere for one month. Lead dioxide reacts with SO3

    present in the atmosphere to produce PbSO4. Lead sulphate is then estimated as

    barium sulphate by measuring transmittance at 420 nm. The rate of conversion of SO2

    into SO3 is then calculated.

    The data showing the Sulphation rate have been compiled in Table 5 & Figure 5.

    The maximum value of sulphation rate for Taj Mahal and Sikandra was determined as

    0.0459 gmSO3 /m2 /day and 0.0816 gmSO3 /m

    2 /day for the month of May and March

    respectively. The minimum value of sulphation rate for Taj Mahal and Sikandra was

    determined as 0.0164 gmSO3/m2 /day and 0.0086 gmSO3 /m

    2 /day for the month of

    March and February respectively.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    57/84

    52

    Table 5. Sulphation rate (gm SO3/m2/day) at Taj Mahal & Sikandra for the year

    2010

    Month Taj Mahal Sikandra

    JAN

    FEB

    MAR

    APR

    MAY

    JUN

    JUL

    AUG

    SEP

    OCT

    NOV

    DEC

    0.0357

    0.0374

    0.0164

    0.0444

    0.0459

    0.0322

    0.0250

    0.0258

    0.0272

    0.0166

    0.0239

    0.0172

    0.0148

    0.0086

    0.0816

    0.0319

    0.0349

    0.0335

    0.0290

    0.0166

    0.0172

    0.0209

    0.0341

    0.0435

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    58/84

    53

    Figure 5: Sulphation Rate (gmSO3/m2/day) at Taj Mahal & Sikandra for the year

    2010

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    59/84

    54

    6. Current Scenario of Air Pollution at Taj Mahal

    The annual average concentration of S.P.M., SO2 & NO2 for last seven years

    tabulated below which reflect the clear picture regarding air quality scenario in the

    ambience of Taj Mahal, Agra.

    On the basis of above observation it can be concluded that the environmental status

    has slightly improved since early 2006. As we have noticed that the concentration of

    gaseous pollutants as well as concentration of S.P.M. has decreased considerably. The

    improvement in environmental status is due to closer of foundry industries and other

    small scale industries from TTZ. Along with this introduction of CNG and LPG operated

    vehicles in public and private transport and development of green belt at TTZ has also

    helped to improve the environmental status.

    Year S.P.M.( Conc. in g/m3 )

    SO2( Conc. in g/m3 )

    NO2( Conc. in g/m3 )

    2004 286.00 3.78 19.63

    2005 275.00 3.48 16.07

    2006 273.03 3.50 07.86

    2007 263.41 3.42 07.45

    2008 273.92 4.06 07.56

    2009 253.10 3.41 06.61

    2010 229.87 3.41 08.27

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    60/84

    55

    The scenario of air quality in the ambience of Taj Mahal can further be improved by

    taking following measures

    1. There should be enough plantations in Taj Tripezium zone to prevent the flow of

    dust laden wind.

    2. In the radius of at least 5 Kms. from Taj Mahal, decongestion in traffic will be

    needed.

    3. In the residential and commercial areas which are located around Taj Mahal, the

    people should be encouraged to use solar energy system instead of diesel

    operated generator during the power cut / failure.

    4. The water level in river Yamuna should also be maintained throughout the year.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    61/84

    56

    1. Introduction

    Agra is rich in tangible cultural heritage having three World Heritage monuments

    and several other nationally important monuments with incredible architecture. Taj

    Mahal is the most famous World Heritage Monument of India. It was built by Mughal

    Emperor Shah Jahan in 1643 on the bank of Yamuna. Besides Taj Mahal, Agra also

    witness two more prominent World Heritage Monuments Agra Fort and Fatehpur Sikri

    built by Mughal Emperor Akbar. Itmad-Ud-Daulahs tomb, Jama Masjid, Chini-Ka-

    Rauza, Akbars tomb etc. are also some of the beautiful archaeological buildings.

    In order to study state of conservation of above World Heritage Monuments and

    to advise on various conservation problems, a team of UNESCO experts jointly with a

    representative of Rhone-Poulenc, France visited Agra, India during 16-24 March, 1997.

    After the visits to important monuments and on site discussions, the expert team of

    UNESCO had a detailed deliberation with the representatives of Archaeological Survey

    of India to explore the possibility of support from UNESCO/ Rhone-Poulenc in the field

    of conservation of World Heritage and other monuments of Agra. UNESCO and Rhone-

    Poulenc, France have agreed to provide financial as well as technical assistance in the

    establishment of the laboratory. Accordingly, ASI was advised to work out requirements

    for the equipments and other facilities. It was also recommended that ASI should

    appoint one Physicist, one Geologist and one biologist to cater to the need of

    multidisciplinary approach to the problems and to make the conservation much effective

    and long lasting.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    62/84

    57

    1.1 Setting Up of Stone Conservation Laboratory

    As per UNESCO-ASI-Rhone-Poulenc programme, the Stone Conservation

    Laboratory has been set at Agra Fort, Agra and is functioning well for the cause of

    conservation and preservation of World Heritage Monuments of Agra and other tangible

    Cultural Heritage. Mr. Christian Manhart, UNSECO representative and ASI officials

    jointly studied the requirements of instruments for the stone conservation laboratory and

    as mutually agreed upon, following instruments have been procured through UNESCO

    representative in India.

    Stereo-microscope : To obtain three dimensionalzooming view of object

    Polarizing microscope : To identify mineral composition of the rock

    Isomet 1000 : To cut the rock specimen to prepare thin section

    Ecomet-3 : To grind and polish the rock specimen

    Slide warmer : To fix the rock specimen on the glass slide by hot

    mounting process

    Petrothin : Grinding & cutting of mounted specimen

    The following equipment have also been procure to upgrade the Stone

    Conservation Laboratory:

    Compression Testing Machine :To evaluate compressive strength of stone block

    Digital Camera & Software : As an aid to microscope for mineral identification

    for microscope

    Vacuum Impregnator :To consolidate weak rock sample before thin section

    preparation

    Mini Gloss Meter : To measure the gloss of stone surface

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    63/84

    58

    2. Research Work

    As the stone conservation laboratory is equipped with facility to prepare thin

    section of stone samples and their microscopic studies. The stone samples of different

    monuments and quarry have been received from the Laboratory of Director (Science),

    ASI, Dehradun as well as from other establishments of ASI. During the year following

    studies have been carried out in the Stone Conservation Laboratory:

    Petrographic studies of stone samples of different monument.

    Comprehensive Scientific investigations on Itmad-ud-daulah.

    2.1 Petrographic Studies

    Petrographic studies of inlayed stone samples of Taj Mahal have been carried

    out to determine the texture, grain size, distribution pattern, binding material and mineral

    composition of rock employed in inlay work. The transmitted light microscopy used in

    identifying the constituent minerals reveals the complete inner matrix of the rock. The

    porosity of the rock can also be assessed with the help of this study.

    2.1.1. Samples

    The stone samples were collected from Taj Mahal. One of the stone samples

    was received from the office of the Director (Science), ASI, Dehradun. The thin sections

    of stone samples were prepared in the Stone Conservation Laboratory, Agra.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    64/84

    59

    2.1.2. Preparation of thin sections

    The thin sections of stone samples were prepared in the laboratory. The samples

    were first cut in desirable shape & size by using Isomet-1000 stone cutter and then

    ground and polished by different grit size carbimet papers with the help of Ecomet-3

    grinder/polisher until the desired surface is obtained to mount on the glass slide. After

    the mounting, the samples were again ground/polished to obtain a proper thin section.

    2.1.3. Petrographic description

    The thin sections of stone samples were subjected to microscopic studies to

    obtain photomicrographs by using polarizing microscope, Nikon Make, Model E 600

    POL. The mineral identification was carried out with the help of Geological Survey of

    India, Lucknow. The description of photomicrographs is as follows.

    2.1.3.1 Inlayed Stones of Taj Mahal

    Yellow Stone

    The rock is fine grained and essentially contains fine grained carbonates in the

    matrix. Numerous fragments, pellets and planer sections of fossils are embedded in the

    matrix. Lithic fragments mostly fine to medium grained quartz & muscovite also occur

    embedded in the matrix.

    Due to abundant fossil shell fragments within fine grained carbonate mud in the

    matrix the rock may be Biomicrite.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    65/84

    60

    Gray Stone

    The rock is predominantly consisting of fine grained carbonate mud alongwith

    fine grained quartz & fine flakes of muscovite. Micro-fine branching cracks are common

    in the rock and these fractures are filled by fine grained opaque. The carbonate phase

    rapidly effervesces with application of acid. The rock in general is very fine grained with

    neatly interlocked carbonate mud and exhibiting granular habit. The rock name is

    Mudstone.

    Stone conservation Lab, Agra

    Figure 1 (a).:Photomicrograph under high magnification showing abundance of

    fragments, pellets and sections of fossilsembedded in a fine grained carbonate mud.

    Cross polars, 10x objective.

    Photomicrograph under higher maginification

    showing the exact nature of the sectional view offossil (centre). Note the coarse grained nature of

    neomorphic spars (marked NMS). Cross polars,20x objective.

    Stone conservation Lab, Agra

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    66/84

    61

    Black Stone

    Abundant fine grained xenomorphic quartz, plagioclase and carbonate constitute

    the matrix of the rock. Granular fine hematite is randomly distributed and occurs asintergranular to quartz-carbonate assemblage. Fine flakes of mica are also present in

    the rock. Fractures are common in the rock. The Rock is Calcareous Slate.

    Stone conservation Lab, AgraStone conservation Lab, Agra

    Stone conservation Lab A ra

    Stone conservation Lab, Stone conservation Lab, Agra

    Figure 2a: Photomicrograph under high magnification showing abundant fine grainedcarbonate mud with branching cracks filled with fine grained opaque which also occur as

    dispersed in the matrix (fine black grains). Crosspolars, 10x objective.

    Figure 2b: Photomicrograph under highermagnification showing the exact nature of the matrix constituent (abundant carbonate) with fracture filled opaque. Cross polars, 20x

    objective.

    Figure 3a: Photomicrograph under high

    magnification showing abundant fine grained

    quartz, carbonate, tiny grains of muscovite and granular opaque (mostly hematite) as matrix

    constituent. Note the granular texture of the rock.Cross polars, 10x objective.

    Figure 3b: Photomicrograph under higher magnification showing the exact nature of the

    fine grained matrix constituents as detailed in above photograph. Note the fracture filled with

    secondary, relatively coarser sized carbonate andquartz (marked Qz). Cross polars, 10x objective.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    67/84

    62

    2.1.3.2. Stone Sample of Sun Temple, Konark

    Abundant medium to fine grained quartz with subsequent amount of stubby,

    subhedral plagioclase occur as framework constituents of the rock. Thin mica plates

    mostly muscovite also occur as ancillary. The quartz grains are mostly fractured and are

    held together by ferruginous cement which is mainly hematite. Limonite is also present

    as a result of oxidation of original cementing material. The rock is Ferruginous

    sandstone.

    Stone Conservation Lab, agra

    Photomicrograph under high magnification showing abundant medium grained quartz (marked Qz), tiny grains of plagioclase

    (marked Pl) and coarse, patchy hematite (marked Hm). Cross polars,

    10x objective.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    68/84

    63

    3. Comprehensive Scientific Investigations on Itmad-Ud-Daulah

    The Itmad-ud-daulah is also known as baby Taj due to architectural resemblance

    with Taj Mahal although it was built well before about hundred years than Taj Mahal.

    There areno complete scientific details on the monument. Therefore, the study focus on

    the comprehensive scientific studies of materials used, weathering problems and their

    remedial measures. In this part of the report the study has been carried out on following

    points.

    Detailed photo-documentation

    Weathering Problems

    Material used

    Sample Collection

    Microscopic Examination

    3.1 Photo-documentation

    In the first phase of the scientific investigation of Itmad-ud-daulah, the detailed

    photo-documentation of the monument was carried out to know about material used and

    basic problems of the monument.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    69/84

    64

    Stone Conservation Lab, Agra

    Main Mausoleum of

    Itmad-ud-daulah

    One of the four gates of the

    monument on the river side

    Stone Conservation Lab, Agra

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    70/84

    65

    The beautiful inlay work on marble with ornamental stones.

    (a) (b)

    (c)

    (a), (b)& (c) : Inlayed stone works on the marble surface

    Octagonal shaped dome on the first floor Unique ornamental work on thefloor of the dome

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    71/84

    66

    Paintings on the lime plastered surfaces on the walls of main hall, side hall &

    corner rooms along with stucco& painting work on the ceilings..

    Painting on the corridor wall of main tomb Painting on stucco on the ceiling of corridor of

    main tomb

    Painting on the corridor wall of main tomb

    Remains of painting on the upper

    arch of river side gate

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    72/84

    67

    Inlaying of marble & black stone on red sandstone surface on the Gates of the

    monument.

    Different patterns of design(Top &

    right) of inlayed marble & black stone

    on red sandstone surface

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    73/84

    68

    3.2 Weathering Problems

    Cracks: Cracks have seen on some decorated panels as well as on plane marble

    blocks which may be due to mechanical stress and other physical factors.

    Water marks due to seepage: Major factor of deterioration is water. The deposition of

    insoluble salts as water marks and dissolution of matrix of ornamental stones are clearly

    visible at several places.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    74/84

    69

    Disintegration of ornamental stone: Due to mechanical & environmental factors the

    ornamental stones which are weaker in comparison to major building blocks get

    deteriorated.

    Due to formation of gap between inlayed stone and engraved surface, mortar

    start loosing which ultimately results in detachment of ornamental stone.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    75/84

    70

    Fading of colour: It may be due to exposure to environment over a long period of time,

    dissolution of matrix material & deposition of foreign material.

    Crust deposition/ Patination: Crust/patina formation is very much predominant in

    black ornamental stones. It may be due to deposition of salts, pollutants or may be due

    to natural patina formation.

    New

    Old

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    76/84

    71

    Leaching of iron and disintegration of marble due to iron dowel.

    Flaking & Chipping of Red sandstone: Mechanical & environmental factors leads to

    develop this problem in red sad stone. Flaking & chipping is weathering pattern of

    sedimentary rocks.

    Iron leaching

    Disintegration

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    77/84

    72

    Loss of Paintings: Inleft hand side picture, the painting loss may be due to bulging of

    lime plaster which get restored later on. In right hand side painting loss may be due to

    water seepage.

    Partial loss No colour

    3.3 Material Used

    The basic structure of monument i.e. the main mausoleum and four gates has

    been constructed with brick and lime mortar. The main mausoleum is veneered withwhite marble while gates with red sandstone. The main mausoleum is entirely covered

    with inlay work. Mainly four types of inlay stones have been used.

    Black stone

    Yellow stone (Khatto)

    Stone with embedded large yellow grains in reddish matrix (Ajubi)

    Designer stone (Abri).

    3.4 Sample Collection

    Both the old and new samples have been collected with the help of In-charge of

    the Monument. The photo-documentation of samples has been done which is shown

    below.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    78/84

    73

    Samples of old Material

    (a). Marble (b). Yellow Stone

    (c). Ajubi (d). Abri

    (e). Black Stone

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    79/84

    74

    3.5 Stereomicroscopic Studies

    Black Stone

    The stereo-photomicrograph of new & old samples, (a) & (b). The whitish

    material is clearly visible in the photomicrograph of old stone sample which may

    be deposition of salts or some other foreign material. The photomicrograph (c) is

    also of old stone sample with thick lime mortar layer on the right side of

    photomicrograph.

    (a) (b)

    (c)

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    80/84

    75

    Yellow Stone

    The photomicrograph (a) of new yellow stone sample in 2xmagnification,

    photomicrograph (b) of old yellow stone sample in same magnification. The aging

    marks are clearly visible in old stone sample.

    (a) (b)

    The photomicrographs (c) & (d) are of new & old samples

    respectively, and obtained by cutting the samples across the plane. Some

    reddish tone in the stone matrix can be seen in old specimen.

    (c) (d)

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    81/84

    76

    Abri Stone

    The stereo photomicrographs of Abri stone sample, New (a) & Old (b), has

    been taken in 1xmagnification. The roughness of surface in old stone is clearly

    visible which indicates the deterioration of stone matrix due to long exposure in

    environment. The uplift of pale yellow grains can be seen in the

    photomicrograph due to recession of grain boundaries & loss of cementing

    material.

    (a) (b)

    Ajubi Stone

    The stereo photomicrographs of Ajubi stone sample, New (a) & Old (b), in

    1xmagnification. The roughness of surface in old stone is clearly visible which

    indicates the deterioration of stone matrix due to long exposure in environment.

    The uplift of larger grains can be seen in the photomicrograph as in case of Abri

    stone.

    (a) (b)

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    82/84

    77

    3.6 TDS/Conductivity Measurement

    The conductivity and total Dissolved Solids have been measured in the

    ornamental stone samples with the help of Eutech conductivity meter, Model;

    Con 510. De-ionised water has been used for the purpose. The results have

    been shown below in the Table.

    The conductivity and TDS value of new Yellow & Ajubi stone samples are higher

    in comparison to old samples which may be due to less maturity of new stone

    samples. There might be some other factors for this variation which is another

    area of investigation.

    3.7 Insoluble Inorganic matter

    The results of conductivity & TDS measurements have been further

    confirmed by determining insoluble inorganic matter of the ornamental stone

    samples. The insoluble inorganic matter content has been found higher in new

    yellow & ajubi stone samples in comparison to same old samples.

    S.No. Description of stone

    sample

    Conductivity

    (S)

    TDS

    (ppm)New Old New Old

    1

    2

    3

    4

    BLACK

    YELLOW

    ABRI

    AJUBI

    49.7

    81.8

    73.0

    76.9

    48.4

    56.4

    78.8

    56.5

    24.8

    40.9

    36.5

    38.4

    28.2

    28.4

    39.4

    28.3

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    83/84

    78

    4. Present Status of Work

    The research work on the stone samples of different quarry of Chunar,

    received from the Laboratory of Director (Science), ASI, Dehradun is under

    progress. The second phase of scientific investigation on Itmad-ud daulah will be

    carried out. This will include instrumental analysis of material used in the

    monument.

    Other Activities of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation

    laboratory

    Training has been imparted to the newly appointed Assistant

    Archaeological Chemists to make them acquaintance with the facilities available

    in the laboratory and their application.

    Training has also been imparted to the students of PGDA, Institute of

    Archaeology every year to them aware of the work being carried out in the

    laboratory.

    Demonstration on research activities in the laboratory to the Officials of

    ASI and other institutions.

  • 8/2/2019 Annual Report of Air Pollution and Stone Conservation Laboratory

    84/84

    Air Pollution Laboratory, Agra

    The Air Pollution Laboratory of A.S.I., Agra came into existence soon after

    the commissioning of oil refinery at Mathura. A number of short term surveys by

    NEERI & other organizations in the seventies to assess the likely impact of air

    pollutants particularly SO2 on white marble of Taj Mahal. Apart from refinery,

    other contributing sources of air pollution at that time were thermal power plant

    near Agra Fort, foundries, tanneries, brick-kilns etc.

    Stone Conservation Laboratory, Agra Fort

    Agra has three World Heritage Monuments along with several centrally

    protected archaeological sites. The requirement of a laboratory was felt to study

    the state of conservation and preservation of such important monuments. The

    ASI with the help of UNESCO & Rohn-Polenc, France took initiative to establish

    a stone conservation laboratory in Agra. Consequently the Stone Conservation

    Laboratory as an integral part of Air Pollution Laboratory has been inaugurated

    on 28th November, 2006.

    Dy. Superintending Archaeological ChemistArchaeological Survey of India