annexes - Eurocontrol · Source: ICAO ADREP accident/incident database Fixed-wing aircraft, no military aircraft Figure 2: Serious incidents (ATS-related or not) reported within ECAC

ANNEXES

ANNEX 1: SAFETY TABLES ....................................................................................................... 1

ANNEX 2: MOST PENALISING LOCATIONS (2001) .................................................................... 3

ANNEX 3: EN-ROUTE AND AIRPORT ATFM DELAY DISTRIBUTION....................................... 6

ANNEX 4: EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY MAPS (EUROPEAN REGIONS)......................................... 7

ANNEX 5: EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY MAPS (ACC) ..................................................................... 8

ANNEX 6: DELAYS AND CAPACITY, DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGY.............................. 9

ANNEX 7: COST TABLES ..........................................................................................................14

ANNEX 8: ANSP FACT SHEETS.................................................................................................16

ANNEX 9: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CIVIL-MILITARY CO-ORDINATION STATUSREPORT....................................................................................................................................48

ANNEX 10: GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................49

ANNEX 11: REFERENCES .........................................................................................................52

PRR 5 – ANNEXES

ANNEX 1: SAFETY TABLES

Depending on sources, the numbers of accidents can vary, sometimes significantly. As aregular exercise, the Safety Regulation Commission (SRC) gathers data from variousestablished sources (ICAO, IATA, UK CAA, NLR, Boeing, Flight Safety Foundation andAviation Safety Net) to which the own EUROCONTROL data collected through the AnnualSummary Templates are added. These are compiled and published as the SRC DOC 2(ref.6). Few analyses are possible due to the large differences between data. Even fewerconclusions can be drawn with respect to ATM and its contribution to incidents andaccidents.

Nevertheless, some of those tables and graphs can give a fair indication of key r isk areasand also on some trends. Until the EUROCONTROL ESARR 2 is implemented by all States,this is the second best source in terms of safety data.

1.1 Accident data

All States have to report accident and serious incident data to ICAO, according to ICAOAnnex 13. However, not all States do so, even if they have not filed any deviation withICAO. Data from the AST collection are reproduced in Chapter 3, therefore only ICAO dataare shown here.

1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total AverageAccidents 40 42 32 33 25 33 30 25 20 27 33 38 25 403 31

Hull losses 15 14 5 7 7 12 11 7 6 5 10 11 8 118 9Fatal accidents 15 11 3 4 5 11 7 4 5 4 5 8 5 87 7

Total fatalities 464 178 51 40 205 228 80 131 157 73 24 69 130 1.830 141

On boardfatalities

453 178 51 40 162 226 80 131 154 72 20 69 126 1.762 136

Third pa rties 11 0 0 0 43 2 0 0 3 1 4 0 4 68 5

Note: Third parties represent ground fatalities.

050

1 001 502 002 503 003 504 004 505 00

1 988 1 98 9 199 0 1 991 1 99 2 1 99 3 199 4 1 995 1 99 6 199 7 199 8 1 99 9 2 00 0051015202530354045

To ta l f ata litiesAc cide ntsFa ta l a cc id en ts

Figure 1: All accidents w ithin ECAC from ICAO ADREP (w ithout helicopters)

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total

SeriousIncidents

20 22 23 34 40 34 46 66 69 84 51 43 532

Source: ICAO ADREP accident/incident database F ixed-w ing aircraft, no military aircraft

Figure 2: Serious incidents (ATS-related or not) reported w ithin ECAC area(1989 – 2000)

PRR 5 – ANNEXES A-2

1.2 Incident data collected by EUROCONTROL

Figure 3 below shows the number of reports submitted by 25 ECAC States to the SRCthrough Annual Summary Templates for the years 1999 and 2000.

Number ofReports

Total FLIGHT RULES TYPE OF OPER ATIONS

IFR/IFR IFR/VFR VFR/VFR GAT/OAT GAT/GAT

1999 2000 1999 2000 1999 2000 1999 2000 1999 2000 1999 2000

AIRPROXReports

652 538 339 174 147 117 36 21 78 59 443 267

ACASReports

625 1318 129 375 11 35 11 25 127 388

ATIR/APDSG form

reports

142 92 40 17 44 7 14 15 35 5 93 40

Note: There is a high number of other reports included in ASTs which still need to be confirmed beforepublishing any figures. When compared w ith SRC data for the last three y ears, the number of reports submittedeither to IATA by airlines or to ICAO by States appear to be far from the actual figures.

Figure 3: ATM related incident reports within ECAC

050

100150200250300350

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99

ICAO seriousincidentsIATA Airprox

Source: SRC

Figure 4: Incidents reported to ICAO and IATA (1990-1999)

The overall number of incidents reported to the ICAO Secretariat is growing but stillrepresents only a small percentage of the incidents reported by the air lines to IATA and asmaller percentage of incidents reported by States through the SRC channel.

1.3 ATM contribution to accidents and incidents

As discussed in chapter 3 and above, incident reports are largely incomplete andinconsistent. Any attempt to assess the contribution of ATM to accidents and incidents r isksto be flawed. It has been therefore decided not to include the ATM contribution in thepresent report, as any attempt to choose one or other ana lysis would largely arbitrary. Forany further details, see ref.6.


ANNEX 2: MOST PENALISING LOCATIONS (2001)

Evolution of en-route most penalising locations1

ReferenceLocation

FlowManagementPosition

En RouteDelay ( ’000

minutes)

CollapsedorElementarySector

Upperor lo wersector

Proportionof the en-

routeDelay

CumulatedProportionEn-route

DelayEBMAWSL MAASTRICHT 924 Elementary Upper 4% 4%LSAZUP2 ZURICH 818 Elementary Upper 4% 8%EBMALUX MAASTRICHT 466 Elementary Upper 2% 11%EBMALNL MAASTRICHT 438 Elementary Upper 2% 13%EGTTS14 LONDON 423 Elementary Lower 2% 15%EDUUWUR KARLSRUHE 417 Elementary Upper 2% 17%LSAGMS3 GENEVE 384 Elementary Upper 2% 19%LSAZUP1 ZURICH 341 Elementary Upper 2% 20%EGTT3C4 LONDON 335 Collapsed Upper 2% 22%LFEUE REIMS 334 Collapsed Upper 2% 23%MERUE PARIS 331 Elementary Upper 2% 25%EGTTS11 LONDON 303 Elementary Lower 1% 27%LSAGISE GENEVE 301 Elementary Lower 1% 28%LECMZMR MADRID 293 Collapsed Both 1% 29%EDUUFFM KARLSRUHE 280 Collapsed Upper 1% 31%LECMDGO MADRID 264 Elementary Upper 1% 32%LFMNNR NICE APP 245 Elementary Lower 1% 33%LFEUHL REIMS 245 Elementary Upper 1% 34%LFFUJ PARIS 236 Elementary Upper 1% 36%EBBULES BRUSSELS 229 Elementary Lower 1% 37%EDWWO3R BREMEN 227 Collapsed Lower 1% 38%EHDELMD MAASTRICHT 202 Elementary Upper 1% 39%LFBUCR1 BORDEAUX 200 Elementary Upper 1% 40%EDLLCOL1 DUESSELDORF 192 Elementary Lower 1% 41%LFEURYX REIMS 192 Collapsed Upper 1% 41%

Data source : CFMU

Table 1 : Most penalising en-route locations (2001)

The ATC sector has been a bottleneck f or 3 years.The ATC sector has been a bottleneck f or 2 years.The ATC sector has been a bottleneck f or 1 year.

1 It also includes the following cases: Lateral / vertical limits of the ATC sector has been modified orits name has been changed or it has been split into two or more sectors, but the sector or itsremaining part is still present in the list of top-25 bottlenecks.


ReferenceLocation


En RouteDelay(’000

minutes)



Proportionof the en-

route delay


DelayLSAZUP2 ZURICH 804 Elementary Upper 3% 3%EBMAWSL MAASTRICHT 715 Elementary Upper 3% 6%EDUUWUR KARLSRUHE 608 Elementary Upper 2% 9%EDUUFFM KARLSRUHE 579 Elementary Upper 2% 11%LECMDGO MADRID 557 Elementary both 2% 13%MERUE PARIS 553 Elementary both 2% 16%LSAZESL ZURICH 478 Elementary Lower 2% 18%EGTTLUE LONDON 449 Elementary Upper 2% 19%EGTTS14 LONDON 417 Elementary Lower 2% 21%LSAGISE GENEVE 371 Collapsed Lower 2% 23%LIPPN L4 PADOVA 366 Collapsed Lower 2% 24%LSAGKU3 GENEVE 341 Collapsed Upper 1% 26%LFEUE REIMS 331 Elementary Upper 1% 27%LSAZNSL ZURICH 328 Elementary Lower 1% 28%LIPPNU6 PADOVA 326 Elementary Upper 1% 30%LECMZMR MADRID 312 Elementary both 1% 31%EBMALUX MAASTRICHT 291 Elementary Upper 1% 32%EHDELMD MAASTRICHT 289 Elementary Upper 1% 33%LIPPN L6 PADOVA 280 Elementary Lower 1% 34%EBMALNL MAASTRICHT 271 Elementary Upper 1% 36%EGTTS11 LONDON 230 Elementary Upper 1% 36%EGTT3C4 LONDON 218 Collapsed Upper 1% 37%LIMMWNL MILANO 207 Elementary Lower 1% 38%LFEURXR REIMS 206 Collapsed Upper 1% 39%LECMPPN MADRID 206 Elementary both 1% 40%

Data source : CFMU


ReferenceLocation


En RouteDelay(’000

minutes)



Proportionen-route

delay


DelayLSAZUAC ZURICH 1878 Collapsed Upper 5% 5%LFEBRUT REIMS 910 Elementary Upper 3% 8%LSAGKIN GENEVE 883 Elementary Both 2% 10%LIPPN L1 PADOVA 880 Elementary Lower 2% 13%LIMMWSL MILANO 806 Elementary Lower 2% 15%LFFTE PARIS 792 Elementary Lower 2% 17%EDUUFFM KARLSRUHE 763 Collapsed Upper 2% 19%LSAZ WSL ZURICH 707 Elementary Lower 2% 21%LIPPN LS PADOVA 616 Collapsed Lower 2% 23%LSAGINS GENEVE 584 Elementary Lower 2% 24%LSAZESL ZURICH 569 Elemetar y Lower 2% 26%LIPPNU1 PADOVA 530 Elementary Upper 1% 27%LIMMESL MILANO 510 Elementary Lower 1% 29%LFMMF1 MARSEILLE 510 Collapsed Upper 1% 30%LIMMENL MILANO 502 Elementary Lower 1% 32%LECBCEN BARCELONA 478 Elementary Both 1% 33%EGTTS14 LONDON 473 Elementary Lower 1% 34%LECMZMR MADRID 466 Elementary Both 1% 35%LIPPSL1 PADOVA 446 Elementary Lower 1% 37%LFEUE REIMS 445 Elementary Both 1% 38%EBMALUX MAASTRICHT 442 Elementary Upper 1% 39%LSAZNSL ZURICH 402 Elementary Lower 1% 40%LSAGSUP GENEVE 380 Collapsed Upper 1% 41%LECBECO BARCELONA 376 Elementary Both 1% 42%LFEE(4) REIMS 353 Elementary Lower 1% 43%

Data source : CFMU



Airport Bottlenecks

Source CFMUAirport Name Airport

ATFM Delay(‘000

minutes)

Cumulatedproportion

Airportoperation

ATCcapacit y

W eather Other

Amsterdam 865 13% 9% 3% 84% 4%Frankfurt 815 25% 52% 7% 31% 10%Milan/Malpensa 626 34% 61% 4% 29% 6%Athens 587 42% 53% 45% 0% 2%Brussels + Meslbroek 395 48% 17% 15% 21% 47%London/Heathrow 385 54% 3% 11% 76% 10%Barcelona 317 59% 16% 42% 41% 1%Paris/Charles-De-Gaulle 291 63% 1% 3% 87% 8%Zurich 261 67% 7% 31% 55% 7%Copenhagen/Kastrup 255 70% 6% 23% 65% 5%Iraklion/Ni kos/Kazantzakis 145 73% 90% 10% 0% 0%Firenze/Peretol a 143 75% 61% 12% 0% 28%Munich 125 76% 0% 3% 70% 26%Vienna 106 78% 16% 41% 27% 15%Warsaw/Okecie 101 79% 11% 79% 5% 5%Geneva 99 81% 21% 69% 5% 5%Rome/Fiumicino 97 82% 18% 28% 43% 11%Basle/Mul house 80 84% 1% 81% 5% 12%Paris/Orly 69 85% 2% 2% 94% 1%Diagoras 67 86% 65% 35% 0% 0%Palma De Mallorca 64 86% 6% 11% 3% 80%Stockholm/Arlanda 59 87% 1% 22% 71% 6%London/Gatwick 55 88% 0% 7% 91% 2%Milan/Linate 54 89% 1% 0% 98% 1%

Data source : CFMU

Table 4 : Most penalising airports (2001)


ANNEX 3 : EN-ROUTE AND AIRPORT ATFM DELAY DISTRIBUTION

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

> 60

56-6

0

51-5

5

46-5

0

41-4

5

36-4

0

31-3

5

26-3

0

21-2

5

16-2

0

11-1

5

06-1

0

01-0

5

Interval of t ime (minutes of delay)

Cum

ulat

ive

% o

f tot

al d

elay

ed fl

ight

s2001 2000

Figure 5: Summer En-route ATFM Delay Distribution

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

> 60

56-6

0

51-5

5

46-5

0

41-4

5

36-4

0

31-3

5

26-3

0

21-2

5

16-2

0

11-1

5

06-1

0

01-0

5

Interval of t ime (minutes of delay)

Cum

ulat

ive

% o

f tot

al d

elay

ed fl

ight

s

2001 2000

Figure 6: Summer Airport ATFM Delay Distribution


ANNEX 4: EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY MAPS (EUROPEAN REGIONS)


ANNEX 5: EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY MAPS (ACC)


ANNEX 6: DELAYS AND CAPACITY, DEFINITIONS ANDMETHODOLOGY

Definitions

Delay DefinitionAir Transport delay Delay calculated with respect to published flight schedules.Arrival delay Difference between actual and scheduled arrival time.Departure delay Difference between actual and scheduled departure time.ATFM delay Delay at departure caused by ATFM regulations (either En-route or

Airport). ATFM delay is calculated with respect to filed flight plansand is based on the difference between Calculated Take Off Time2

(CTOT) and the last Estimated Take Off Time3 (ETOT).En-route ATFM delay Delay caused by En-route regulations – the reference location in this

case is Airspace or Special Point.Airport ATFM delay Delay caused by Airport regulations – the reference location in this

case is Aerodrome or Aerodrome Zone.Primary delay A delay other than reactionary.Reactionary delay Delay caused by late arrival of aircraft or crew from previous

journeys.

Figure 7: Delay definitions

PunctualityPunctuality is adherence to published schedules. It is measured by on-time performance4

and departure & arrival delay with respect to the flight schedule (see Figure 8). Mostairlines preserve punctuality by using buffers taking predictable delays into account.

Flightschedule

Actual

Arrival delay

Buffer

Taxi Out Airborne Taxi In

Take off Landing

Departuredelay

DelaySchedule

Unconstrained flight

Out Off InOn

Figure 8: Air Transport delays and punctuality

2 Based on the take-off slot assigned by the CFMU.3 The last take-off time requested by the aircraft operator.4 For example, the percentage of flights arriving within 15 minutes of scheduled arrival.


Figure 9 shows the breakdown of departure delay causes for air transport.

Airline26%

ATFM21%

Weather3%

Airport9%

Others4%

Reactionary37%

Data Source : CODA

Figure 9: Air Transport departure delay causes (2001)

Effective Capacity and Expected Delay

EUROCONTROL translates the ECAC delay target5 into capacity targets for individua lACCs, using the FAP methodology6. ANSPs then indicate capacity increase commitmentsfor each of their ACCs. Results are monitored using the traffic/delay graph for each ACC(Figure 10). The figure shows the capacity committed7 by the ACC (the black line) andplots of actual traffic/delay for that ACC.

0

5 000

10 000

15 000

1 200 1 400 1 600 1 800 2 000 2 200 2 400Traff ic (f lights)

En-

rout

e de

lay

(min

utes

)

Ac tual delayExpected delay

Figure 10: Individual ACC capacity target

This s implified representation of ACC capacity (delay threshold and slope) has beenfound to be sufficiently accurate for the purpose of capacity planning and monitoring.

• Capacity increase commitments by the ACC can be characterised by aproportional shift to the right of the black line shown in Figure 10.

• The expected delay from this ACC for a given level of actual traffic can becomputed easily (dotted blue line shown in Figure 10).

5 For 2001, the Summer en-route ATFM delay target has been set at 2.8 minutes6 “Future ATM Profile Methodology”, M. Dalichampt, G. Flynn, S. Mahlich, EurocontrolExperimental Centre, Bretigny sur Orge, France, June 1997.7 Committed capacity represents the average delay for a given level of traffic.


The combination of de lay thresholds and slope profiles among a ll ACCs results in apower function relationship between delays and traffic at ECAC level (see Figure 11).The relationship is given by D ∝ Tk, where the power k is the elasticity factor, D is delayand T is traffic. For 2001, the elasticity factor for en-route delay8 was shown to be 7,which means that a 1% variation in traffic will result in a 7% variation in en-route delay,or D ∝ T7 (see a lso Figure 14).

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

180000

200000

14000 16000 18000 20000 22000 24000 26000 28000

Da ily Traffic (Fligh ts )

Dai

ly A

TF

M D

ela

y (M

inu

tes

2001

2000

1999

19971998

Figure 11: Relationship between Traffic and En-route Delays

Figure 12 shows the consolidation of expected ACC delays at ECAC level, which can beseen to be very close to actual ECAC delays. One can conclude that for delay/capacityanalysis purposes:• Expected delays capture the traffic/delay relationship with sufficient accuracy;• ACC capacity is characterised sufficiently accurately by the committed capacity line.

0

50.000

100.000

150.000

200.000

0 5.000 10.000 15.000 20.000 25.000 30.000

Traffic (flights)

Enro

ute

dela

y (m

inut

es)

Weekend actual delays

Week day actual delays

Weekend expected delaysWeek day expected delays

Weekend

Week day

Figure 12: Actual and expected traffic/delay relationship

Substantial progress has been made through a better understanding of the traffic/delayrelationship and a simple characterisation of airspace capacity. In particular, thedifference between week and weekend delays is explained by the model without anyspecific addit ional assumpt ion (see F igure 12). The observed difference between weekand weekend delays mainly originates from different traffic patterns and a mismatchbetween week-end demand and capacity.

8 See ref. 17 (Yearly ATFM Summary, 2001), section 2.6.3, Traffic and Delay Variations.


The time series of expected delays (blue line) and actual delays (red line) are shown inFigure 13, together with actual traffic (black line). Any divergence between actual andexpected traffic is an indication of events which have not been factored in capacityestimates, e.g:

• temporary restrictions at implementation of new ATC centre or route structure(from 19 April to mid July in this case),

• higher capacity than foreseen (after mid July).

0

50 000

100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

Jan-01

Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-01

Jul-01

Aug-01

Sep-01

Oct-01

Nov-01

Dec-01

Min

utes

of E

n ro

ute

Del

ay

010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00070 00080 00090 000100 000

Num

ber o

f AC

C m

ovem

ents

Actual Delay Expected Delay Traff icData Source : CFM U

Figure 13: Weekly traffic, expected and actual ATFM delays (ECAC)

y = 5x - 0.15R2 = 70%

y = 7x - 0.15R2 = 83%

y = 0.5x - 0.12R2 = 1%

-100%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

-10% -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4%

Traffic Variation

Del

ay V

aria

tions

2001 Average Delay Variation2001 Average EnRoute Delay Variation2001 Average Airport Delay VariationLi (2001 A D l V i i ) Source : CFMU

Figure 14: Traffic and delay variation

Figure 14 is extracted from the ATFM summary 2001 (ref.17). The capacity indicator,called “effective capacity”, is derived from the linear relationship between delay variation(∆D) and traffic variation (∆T) illustrated there. This can also be expressed

asTdTk

DdD = , where the elasticity factor k is equal to 7 for 2001 (en-route) data.


Upon integration, the following relationship is derived: k

TT

DD

��

��

�=

00

,

where T= actual traffic, T0= effective capacity, both expressed in flights,D= average en-route ATFM delay per flight (min/flight),D0= optimum en-route ATFM delay (taken to be 1 min/flight),k= traffic/delay elasticity (k~7 for en-route ATFM delays).

Effective capacity , which is defined as the traffic which can be handled, given an

optimum level of delay, can then be ca lculated using: k

DD

TT

1

00 �

�

�

�

��

�

�= .


ANNEX 7: COST TABLES

The unit rates for 2001 were approved by the enlarged Commission. These unit rates were usedto calculate route charges in 2001. Costs in respect of Santa Maria FIR are excluded.

Cost Bases and National Unit Rates for 2001

Eurocontrol CostsNationalCosts

Maastricht General (3)

Reductionsfor

ExemptedFlights

ReducedCost Base

Balance forYear 1998

CostsChargeable to

Users

ChargeableServiceUnits

NationalUnit

Rates

EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR EURStates

1 2a 2b 3 4=1+2-3 5 6=4-5 7 8=6/7Austria 121 802 722 0 9 225 793 3 175 709 127 852 806 -6 781 833 134 634 639 2 060 000 65.36Belgium-Lux 94 575 973 33 024 586 9 513 182 2 255 510 134 858 231 6 884 690 127 973 541 1 918 500 66.70Bulgaria 75 637 135 0 3 992 142 80 910 79 548 367 -4 193 167 83 741 534 1 474 750 56.78Croatia (1) 27 659 627 0 668 708 0 28 328 335 0 28 328 335 600 000 47.21Cyprus 22 651 808 0 1 291 275 374 862 23 568 222 1 898 875 21 669 347 1 115 597 19.42Czech Republic 33 750 540 0 2 040 069 435 565 35 355 044 5 503 890 29 851 154 865 000 34.51Denmark 62 544 399 0 5 101 162 1 393 225 66 252 337 -467 476 66 719 813 1 285 550 51.90France 791 946 615 0 58 357 186 22 074 631 828 229 170 46 408 358 781 820 812 14 975 251 52.21FYROM 7 846 208 0 489 748 127 867 8 208 090 -1 236 698 9 444 788 166 002 56.90Germany (1) 585 508 834 40 783 333 57 586 442 0 683 878 609 9 040 304 674 838 306 9 950 000 67.82Greece 101 544 678 0 5 797 554 4 951 258 102 390 974 -22 964 107 125 355 081 3 376 000 37.13Hungary 45 269 907 0 2 658 682 272 968 47 655 621 -351 991 48 007 612 1 676 000 28.64Ireland 55 250 000 0 3 606 210 1 284 132 57 572 078 4 074 882 53 497 196 2 749 500 19.46Ital y 447 583 600 0 34 376 980 26 121 199 455 839 381 47 652 138 408 187 243 7 255 000 56.26Malta 9 405 175 0 463 712 57 467 9 811 420 -52 472 9 863 892 224 000 44.04Moldova ( 1) 1 318 448 0 74 484 0 1 392 932 0 1 392 932 28 200 49.39Netherlands 81 326 944 19 351 081 9 056 721 2 255 460 107 479 286 -6 133 140 113 612 426 2 148 510 52.88Norway (2) 61 144 136 0 4 555 238 85 553 65 613 820 -2 503 875 68 117 695 1 260 072 54.06Portugal 85 205 360 0 4 645 442 1 424 359 88 426 443 2 553 494 85 872 949 2 133 693 40.25Romania 96 876 231 0 4 621 630 247 518 101 250 343 7 330 267 93 920 076 2 219 574 42.31Slovak Republic 25 852 507 0 1 281 058 175 055 26 958 510 4 339 591 22 618 918 385 000 58.75Slovenia 9 592 002 0 682 220 321 698 9 952 524 -2 448 109 12 400 632 198 000 62.63Spain-Canarias 69 354 309 0 4 083 359 737 592 72 700 076 1 196 080 71 503 996 1 429 869 50.01Spain-Continental 330 542 810 0 19 936 397 11 074 512 339 404 696 -6 289 222 345 693 917 7 056 803 48.99Sweden 123 669 247 0 8 323 417 857 564 131 135 100 -5 946 282 137 081 382 2 508 277 54.65Switzerland 103 779 572 0 8 289 141 2 169 860 109 898 853 7 969 992 101 928 861 1 337 320 76.22Turkey 176 369 170 0 12 371 257 1 048 659 187 691 768 -8 462 452 196 154 220 4 430 000 44.28United Kingdom(2) 758 920 905 0 50 574 656 1 903 474 807 592 087 27 979 000 779 613 087 9 334 000 83.52

Grand Total 4 406 928 863 93 159 000 323 663 865 84 906 605 4 738 845 123 105 000 584 4 633 844 538 84 160 468 55.06

(1) Total service units.(2) Civ il costs and civ il service units.Source: Final estimates of the route charges Cost Bases and Unit Rates for2001(WP/CE/R/00/61/2753/FIN)


The following data were used to conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis.National Costs

1997Actual

1998Actual

1999Actual

2000Actual

2001Forecast

Variation2001/2000

Avg annualincrease

1997 - 2001States

('000 Euro) ('000 Euro) ('000 Euro) ('000 Euro) ('000 Euro) % %Austria 101 318 120 890 120 072 121 462 122 318 0.7% 4.8%Belgium-Lux. (2) 108 129 101 321 106 637 112 354 123 713 10.1% 3.4%Bulgaria 0 65 828 67 280 74 869 75 637 1.0%Croatia 0 7 474 17 352 28 359 27 660 -2.5%Cyprus 17 253 18 695 20 335 23 950 23 806 -0.6% 8.4%Czech Republic 20 587 23 557 32 461 31 374 33 751 7.6% 13.2%Denmark 51 016 52 153 58 605 61 307 67 331 9.8% 7.2%France (3) 674 825 696 748 729 271 762 623 791 947 3.8% 4.1%FYROM 0 0 6 251 7 363 8 161 10.8%Germany (2) 474 727 471 503 533 345 564 816 634 765 12.4% 7.5%Greece 59 237 54 389 101 584 105 839 116 049 9.6% 18.3%Hungary 32 194 31 658 36 230 42 032 45 270 7.7% 8.9%Ireland 46 225 45 611 48 877 47 102 58 250 23.7% 6.0%Ital y 332 353 338 956 390 311 400 820 447 582 11.7% 7.7%Malta 6 233 7 330 7 567 7 557 8 313 10.0% 7.5%Moldova 0 0 0 0 1 318Netherlands (2) 74 662 81 692 89 303 90 795 104 019 14.6% 8.6%Norway 50 938 53 638 56 879 59 792 60 692 1.5% 4.5%Portugal Lisboa 61 968 61 343 71 229 96 555 85 205 -11.8% 8.3%Romania 0 71 016 89 796 89 465 90 663 1.3%Slovak Republic 15 364 17 565 22 301 21 124 25 853 22.4% 13.9%Slovenia 6 878 8 374 7 611 10 556 10 698 1.3% 11.7%Spain-Canarias 51 813 51 296 54 322 62 944 69 494 10.4% 7.6%Spain-Continental 232 967 238 676 266 370 304 579 341 244 12.0% 10.0%Sweden 95 748 92 720 105 763 109 704 118 163 7.7% 5.4%Switzerland 76 114 75 580 80 696 86 107 97 396 13.1% 6.4%Turkey 162 265 137 565 165 981 137 837 176 369 28.0% 2.1%United Kingdom 558 763 637 946 621 983 700 369 677 465 -3.3% 4.9%

EUROCONTROL Costs (1)

1997Actual

1998Actual

1999Actual

2000Actual

2001Forecast

Variation2001/2000

Avg annualincrease

1997 - 2001

Titre I 260 077 265 691 279 008 315 574 332 075 5.2% 6.3%

Total Costs

1997Actual

1998Actual

1999Actual

2000Actual

2001Forecast

Variation2001/2000

Avg annualincrease

1997 - 2001

Total 3 571 658 3 829 213 4 187 419 4 477 229 4 775 206 6.7% 7.5%EURO 1997 3 571 658 3 684 895 4 006 740 4 277 172 4 571 767 6.9% 6.4%EURO 2000 4 477 229 4 773 888 6.6%

(1) Maastricht and CRCO excluded.(2) Maastricht included.(3) Including contribution paid by France to the United Kingdom and Switzerland.

Source: Final estimates of the Cost Bases and Unit Rates for 2001(CE/R/00/61/2754/FIN); Finalestimates of the route charges Cost Bases and Unit Rate for 2001 (CE/R/00/61/2753/FIN).


ANNEX 8: ANSP FACT SHEETS

These ANSP Fact Sheets have been compiled by the PRU from information available inMarch 2002 and validated by the concerned ANSP.

* ANSPs are presented in the order of this table

State Company Name Full Name PageAlbania NATA National Air Traffic Agency A-17Austria Austro Control Austro Control Osterreichische Gesellschaft für

Zivilluftfahrt mbHA-18

Belgium Belgocontrol Belgocontrol A-19Bulgaria ATSA Air Traffic Services Authority of Bulgaria A-20Croatia Croatia Control Croatia Control Ltd, Croatian Air Navigation

ServicesA-21

Cyprus DCAC Department of Civil Aviation of Cyprus A-22CzechRepublic

ANS CR Air Navigation services of Czech Republic A-23

Denmark NAVIAIR Air Navigation Services – Flyvesikringstjenesten A-24Estonia EANS Estonian Air Navigation Services A-25Finland CAA Civil Aviation Administration Finland A-26France DNA Directorate of Air Navigation A-27FYRO M CAA Civil Aviation Authority of the Former Yugoslav

Republic of MacedoniaA-28

Germany DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH A-29Greece HCAA Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority A-30Hungary HungaroControl HungaroControl A-31Ireland IAA Irish Aviation Authority A-32Italy ENAV Company for Air Navigation Services A-33Malta MIA Malta International Airport plc A-34Republic ofMoldova

MO LDATSA Moldavian Air Traffic Services Authority A-35

Maastricht MUAC-EURO CONTRO L

Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre A-36

TheNetherlands

LVNL Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland A-37

Norway NATAM Norwegian Air Traffic and Airport Management A-38Portugal NAV, EP Navegação Aérea de Portugal E.P. A-39Romania RO MATSA Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration A-40SlovakRepublic

LPS, SR Letové Prevádzkové Služby SlovenskejRepubliky, Státny Podnik

A-41

Slovenia CAAS Civil Aviation Authority of the Republic ofSlovenia – Air Navigation Services Department

A-42

Spain AENA Aeropuertos Españoles y Navegacíon Aérea A-43Sweden LFV Swedish Civil Aviation Administration –

LuftfartsverketA-44

Switzerland skyguide skyguide A-45Turkey DHMI General Directorate of State Airports Authority

– Air Navigation DivisionA-46

UnitedKingdom

UK NATS National Air Traffic Services Ltd A-47

National Air Traffic Agency (NATA), Albania

Institutional arrangements and links STATUS:State enterprise since January 1992. As of 1998 jointstock company.100% State-owned.

Albania is a member of EUROCONTROL as of April 2002.

AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE FOR: - Safety Regulation

DGCA

- Airspace RegulationDGCA

- Economic RegulationDGCA

NATACorporate Governance Structure

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Robert Petri

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO): Preparim Zuna

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:-both GAT and OAT traffic 1 ACC (Tirana)-controls both upper and lower airspace 1 APP (Tirana; APP co-located with ACC)

1 TWRSIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 36 590 km²

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (LEK ´000)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 1 Euro = 129,43 LEK Total revenues 438 833 349 719 992 817 126%En-route revenues 136 523 133 632 782 034 473%% En-route revenues 31% 38% 79% ---Total assets 720 359 819 881 973 621 35%Total staff 150 154 145 -3%Total ATCOs 29 25 32 10%

Number of IFR flights* 29 629 31 257 76 552 158%Number of IFR km n/a n/a n/a n/a

* Source: CFMU (the figures include military flights operating as GAT)

NationalAir Traffic

Agency(NATA)

Ministry ofTransport (M of T)

DirectorateGeneral of Civil

Aviation (DGCA)

SUPERVISORY BOARD (3 members)Chairman + 2 members

Members represent: 2 (Chairman + 1 member) M of T,1 M of EP.

Chairman is also Head of ATS Dept. of DGCA.

EXECUTIVE BOARD (3 Members)CEO + 2 vice-directors

CEO appointed by the Supervisory Board

Ministry ofEconomy andPrivatisation(M of EP)

Ministryof

Defence(M of D)

AlbanianArmy’s

Air Force

Austro Control Österreichische Gesellschaft für Zivilluftfahrt mbH,Austriawww.austrocontrol.at

Institutional arrangements and linksSTATUS:

Limited liability joint-stock company as of 1994.100% State-owned (Law makes provision forAustrian Airports to own up to 49 %).

AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE FOR:- Safety Regulation

Most of the regulatory activity/work is carriedout by Austro Control itself, although the powerfor regulatory decisions lies with the M of TIT.

- Airspace RegulationM of TIT, normally on basis of proposals ofAustro Control

- Economic RegulationCovered by the Commercialisation Act,the Managing Board, and Federal Acts relating toprocurement and accounting.

Corporate Governance Structure AUSTRO CONTROL

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:KR Dkfm. Helmuth Hamminger

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Dr. Christoph Baubin

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 1 ACC (Wien)- controls both upper and lower airspace 6 APPs (Wien, Graz, Innsbruck, Klagenfurt, Linz, Salzburg)

6 TWRsSIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 0 AFIS 83 850 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (Euro ’000)Total revenues 163 769 144 927 167 629 2%En-route revenues 117 559 99 959 121 299 3%% En-route revenues 72% 69% 72 % ---Total assets 204 959 207 571 221 746 8%

Total staff 1 022 1 024 1 007 -1%Total ATCOs 214 222 225 5%Number of IFR flights 759 000 754 000 854 000 13%NumberIFR km 141 685 000 130 711 000 150 125 000 6%

AUSTROCONTROL

Federal Ministry ofTransport, Innovation andTechnology as supreme

CAA ( M of TIT )

Federal Ministry ofDefence ( M of D )

Air Division

GENERAL ASSEMBLY - M of TIT

MANAGING BOARD (2 members )CEO + 1 member

Members appointed by M of TIT.


All members are appointed by M of TIT.Members represent: 1 from M of TIT, 1 from M of Finance,

1 from Airport Vienna, 2 other members from the field of aviation,3 members from works council.

Belgocontrol, Belgiumwww.belgocontrol.be

Institutional arrangements and links

Corporate Governance Structure

SCOPE OF SERVICES:- only GAT traffic- controls lower airspace up to FL 245, including Luxembourg airspace above FL 135

SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 36 000 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (Euro ’000) Total revenues 132 154 156 268 154 587 17%En-route revenues* 107 627 113 094 120 187 12%% En-route revenues 81% 72% 78% ---Total assets 275 220 296 557 318 202 16%Total staff 972 940 995 2%Total ATCOs n/a n/a 335 ---

Number IFR flights 552 907 596 926 594 963 8%Number of IFR flights* 898 000 979 000 1 026 000 14%Number IFR km* 132 210 000 143 061 000 150 052 000 13%

* For Belgian airspace

CAA

Brussels InternationalAirport Company

( B.I.A.C. )

Ministry ofTransport andInfrastructure

( M of TI )

Ministry ofPublic

Enterprise( M of PE )

BELGOCONTROL

Ministry ofDefence

( M of D)

SUPERVISORY BOARD (10 members)Chairman + CEO + 8 members

Members appointed by M of TI; CEO represents staff.

BelgianAirspace

Committee( BELAC )

EXECUTIVE BOARD (4 members)CEO + 3 members

STATUS:Public Autonomous Enterprise as of 1998under a management contract.100% State-owned.


Civil Aviation Administration

- Airspace RegulationBelgian Airspace Committee

- Economic RegulationMinistry of Transport and Infrastructure

BELGOCONTROL

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Bernard Martens

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Jean-Claude Tintin

OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:1 ACC (Brussels)3 APPs (Brussels, Antwerp, Oostende)5 TWRs (Brussels, Antwerp, Liege, Charleroi, Oostende)0 AFIS

Air Traffic Services Authority of Bulgaria (ATSA), Bulgariawww.atsa.bg


STATUS:State enterprise as of April 2001 (Art 53 §1 ofthe Civil Aviation Law).100% State-owned.


Civil Aviation Administration (Ministry ofTransport and Communication)

- Airspace RegulationAirspace Management Board

- Economic RegulationMinistry of Transport and Communication

Corporate Governance Structure (2001) ATSA (2001)

CHAIRMAN OF THE CONTROL BOARD:Apik Garabedian

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Tzvetan Dilov (since October 2001)

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 2 ACCs (Sofia, Varna)- controls both upper and lower airspace 3 APPs (Sofia, Varna, Burgas)- additional activities: training of ATCOs. 7 TWRs (Sofia, Varna, Burgas, Plovdiv,

Gorna Oriahovitza, Rousse, Stara Zagora)SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 2 AFIS (Sofia and Vidin)145 470 km2 (comprising 117 000 km2 plus 28 470 km2 delegated over the Black Sea)

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (BGN’000)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 0,5112 Euro=1 BGN Total revenues 149 292 141 461 155 109 4%En-route revenues 116 782 132 739 146 454 25%% En-route revenues 78% 94% 94% ---

Total assets 231 002 298 467 349 567 51%Total staff 1 450 1 450 1 450 0%Total ATCOs 435 446 450 3%Number of IFR flights 290 000 340 000 313 000 8%Number of IFR km 81 371 000 83 305 000 88 740 000 9%

AirportsOperators

Ministry of Transportand Communication

( M of TC )

Civil AviationAdministration

CONTROL BOARD (5 Members)Chairman + 4 members

Chairman is appointed by the M of TC.The 4 members represent: Director in the Ministry of

Finance, Director in the Ministry of Labour and SocialServices, ATSA DG and ATSA Deputy DG.

Air Traffic ServicesAuthority of Bulgaria

Ministry ofDefence

( M of D )

MANAGEMENT BOARD (5 members)DG + 4 members

DG is appointed by the M of TC

AirspaceManagement

Board

Hrvatska kontrola zračne plovidbe d.o.o.Croatia Control Ltd, Croatian Air Navigation Serviceswww.crocontrol.hr


Limited liability company as of 1 January 2000100% State-ownedIntegrated civil/military ANSP


Croatian Civil Aviation Authority

- Airspace RegulationCroatia Control Ltd and Military Authorities

- Economic Regulation State Law and Croatia Control Ltd

Corporate Governance Structure CROATIA CONTROL LTD

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Ante Čajić

DIRECTOR GENERAL: Dra�en Ramljak

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- both GAT and OAT traffic 1 ACC (Zagreb)- controls both upper and lower airspace 8 APPs (Zagreb, Pula, Split, Dubrovnik, Rijeka, Zadar, Osijek, Lo�inj) - ATS provision in Sarajevo FIR (Bosnia & Herz.) 10 TWRs within FL 290 to FL 390 and FL 100 to FL 290 1 AFIS (to be opened soon and located as a sector at Zagreb ACC)

SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE:123 350 km²

Year 1998* 1999* 2000 00/98

currency(HRK’000)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 0,131EURO = 1HRKTotal revenues n/a n/a 252 275 n/aEn-route revenues n/a n/a 252 275 n/a% En-route revenues n/a n/a 100% --

Total assets n/a n/a 306 777 n/aTotal staff 538 578 585 9%Total ATCOs 349 374 408 17%Number of IFR flights 125 000 91 000 183 000 46%Number of IFR km 19 156 000 15 086 000 46 856 000 145%

* Before 2000 all accounting was kept as budgetary within the M of MATC and the data is not available

Ministry of MaritimeAffairs, Transport

and Communications(M of MATC)

Croatia ControlLtd

Civil AviationAuthority

ASSEMBLY (3 members)The President represents M of MATC (Minister), the other two

members represent M of D (Minister) and M of F (Minister)

SUPERVISORY BOARD (5 members)The Chairman + 4 members

The members represent the M of MATC, M of D,M of F, and employees. They are appointed for a 4-years period.The member representing the employees is elected and appointed

pursuant to the Company Statute and Labour Relations Act.

MANAGEMENT Director General

The DG is appointed by the Supervisory Board for a 5-yearsperiod, following an open competition and under the conditions

stipulated by the Company Statute.

Ministry ofDefence(M of D)

Department of Civil Aviation of Cyprus (DCAC), Cypruswww.mcw.gov.cy


Government Department100% State-owned


Department of Civil Aviation of Cyprus

- Airspace RegulationDepartment of Civil Aviation of Cyprus

- Economic RegulationMinistry of Finance

Corporate Governance Structure DCAC

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF DCAC :J. PapadopoulosCOO & DIRECTOR OF ANS DEPARTMENT:Costas Orphanos

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 1 ACC (Nicosia)- controls both upper and lower airspace 0 APP- owns and operates 2 airports 3 TWRs (Nicosia, Larnaca, Paphos)

0 AFIS


Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (CYP’000)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 1,74 Euro = 1CYP

Total revenues 46 320 51 361 54 941 19%En-route revenues 10 871 11 792 13 770 27%% En-route revenues 23% 23% 25% ---Total assets n/a n/a n/a n/aTotal staff 1 013 1 028 1 055 4%Total ANS dept. staff 106 105 126 19%Total ATCOs 59 58 79 34%Number of IFR flights 180 000 193 000 209 000 16%Number of IFR km 55 018 000 60 314 00 66 646 000 21%

Department of Civil Aviation(DCAC)

Air Transport Air Navigation and Airport Services Department Department

• Minister of Communications and Works: Mr. Averof Neophytou

•Director General DCAC: J.Papadopoulos• COO of DCAC: Costas Orphanos• Director for ANS Dept: Costas Orphanos

Ministryof

Finance

Ministryof Foreign

Affairs

Ministry ofCommunications

and Works

CyprusTelecommunications

Authority( CYTA )

Rizeni Letoveho Provozu (RLP)Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic (ANS CR)www.rlp.cz


State-enterprise founded under the StateEnterprise Act in 1995100% state-owned

AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE FOR:4. - Safety Regulation

Civil Aviation Authority

5. - Airspace RegulationBody for Strategic ASM

6. - Economic RegulationMinistry of Transport andCommunication

Corporate Governance Structure

8. CHAIRMAN OF THE Board :Ivan Krakora

9. DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Petr Materna

SCOPE OF SERVICES: 12. OPERATIONAL UNITS:- only GAT traffic 1 ACC ( Praha )- controls both upper and lower airspace 4 APPs ( Praha, Karlovy Vary, Brno,

Ostrava )


Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (CZK’000)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 28,1 Euro = 1000 CZKTotal revenues 1 502 468 2 003 524 1 762 630 17%En-route revenues 998 817 1 463 853 1 147 073 15%% En-route revenues 66% 73% 65% ---Total assets 2 326 410 2 939 497 2 997 179 29%Total staff 688 706 756 10%Total ATCOs 148 153 165 11%Number IFR flights 252 000 307 000 322 000 28%Number IFR km 52 769 000 70 171 000 69 834 000 32%

Ministry ofTransport and

Communication( M of TC )

Civil AviationDepartment

Civil AviationAuthority (CAA)

Airport Authority

Ministry ofDefence

( M of D )Military Aviation

Department

FUALevel 1

Body forStrategic

ASM

SUPERVISORY BOARD (6 members )Chairman + 5 members

Members appointed by: 4 M of TC, 2 ANS CRemployees.

Air NavigationServices of theCzech Republic

(ANS CR )Private Providers

of ATS

∙ Director General (CEO): Petr MaternaDG appointed by the M of TC

STATUSState-enterprise founded under the StateEnterprise Act in 1995.100% State-owned.



- Airspace RegulationBody for Strategic ASM

- Economic RegulationMinistry of Transport and Communication

ANS CR

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD:Ivan Krakora

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Petr Materna

OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:1 ACC (Praha)4 APPs (Praha, Karlovy Vary, Brno, Ostrava)5 TWRs (Praha, Karlovy Vary, Brno, Ostrava, Pardubice)1 AFIS (located in Praha ACC)

Flyvesikringstjenesten (NAVIAIR)Air Navigation Services, Denmarkwww.naviair.dk

Institutional arrangements and links (as of 1 January 2001)

STATUS: State enterprise

Separation from SLV effective as of 1 Sept 2001 100% State-owned


Civil Aviation Administration (SLV)

- Airspace Regulation Civil Aviation Administration (SLV)

- Economic Regulation Civil Aviation Administration (SLV)

Corporate Governance Structure NAVIAIR

No Supervisory Board

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO) : Morten Dambæk

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS (excluding Greenland):- only GAT traffic 1 ACC (Copenhagen)- controls both upper and lower airspace 4 APPs- ANS Greenland upper airspace is delegated to 8 TWRsIceland ANSP 1 AFIS

SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 158 300 km2 (excluding Greenland)

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

All figures relate to SLV prior to separation

Currency (DKK’000)

Average exchange rate for 2000: 134 EURO = 1000 DKK Total revenues 729 000 851 175 888 291 22%En-route revenues 429 204 455 827 473 085 10%%En-route revenues 59% 54% 53% ---Total assets 232 840 230 530 335 827 44% Total staff 998 997 1 016 2%Total ANS staff 737 739 745 1%Total ATCOs 258 269 264 2%Number IFR flights 551 000 576 000 585 000 6%Number IFR km 97 861 000 104 479 000 107 664 000 10%

DanishCAA(SLV)


The CEO is appointed by the M of T.

AirNavigation

Service(NAVIAIR)

Ministry ofTransport(M of T)

AircraftAccident

InvestigationBoard(AAIB)

MET(DMI)

CopenhagenAirport

Bornholm& VagarAirports

Lennuliiklusteeninduse AktsiaseltsEstonian Air Navigation Services (EANS), Estoniawww.eans.ee


Joint-stock company as of 1998.100% State-owned.State not member of EUROCONTROL.


Estonian Civil Aviation Administration

- Airspace RegulationGovernment of the Republic of Estonia

- Economic RegulationGovernment of the Republic of Estonia

Corporate Governance Structure EANS

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Andrus Maide

CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD & CEO:Jaan Tamm

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 1 ACC (Tallinn)- controls both upper and lower airspace 1 APP (Tallinn)- consultancy services 1 TWR (Tallinn)


Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (EEK’000)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 63,91 Euro = 1 000 EEK Total revenues 113 779 120 834 129 934 14%En-route revenues 113 736 109 405 119 289 5%% En-route revenues 100% 91% 92% ---Total assets 219 646 289 742 269 200 23%Total staff 131 122 111 -15%Total ATCOs 38 38 38 0%Number of IFR flights 68 417 68 780 77 935 14%Number of IFR km 17 391 027 18 054 997 19 578 361 13%

SUPERVISORY BOARD ( 6 members )Chairman + 5 members

Members: 3 appointed by M of TC, of which 1 is electedChairman by members of the Supervisory Board; 3

appointed by M of F, of which one represents M of D.

EXECUTIVE BOARD ( 3 members)CEO + 2 members



Estonian Civil AviationAdministration

Airport Operators EANS

IlmailulaitosCivil Aviation Administration Finland (CAA), Finland www.ilmailulaitos.com


Commercial State Enterprise as of 1991.100% state-owned.Integrated civil/military ANSP.


Flight Safety AuthorityBy law safety regulatory functions are separated from theANS Dept. and the Airport Dept.

- Airspace RegulationThe ANS Department

- Economic RegulationCouncil of State – sets service, operational and profitobjectives for the CAA.

Corporate Governance Structure as of 2000 CAA FINLAND

CHAIRMAN OF THE CAA BOARD OF DIRECTORS:Jussi Järventaus

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Mikko Talvitie

DIRECTOR OF THE ANS DEPARTMENT:Heikki Jaakkola

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- both GAT and OAT traffic 2 ACCs (Rovaniemi, Tampere)- controls both upper and lower airspace 5 APPs (Helsinki, Jyväskylä, Kuopio, Tampere-Pirkkala, Rovaniemi)- CAA owns and operates 25 airports 2 Mil-APPs (Halli, Kauhava)

22 TWRsSIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 6 AFIS (Enontekiö, Kittilä, Ivalo, Kajaani, Savonlinna, Kuusamo)439 790 km²

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (Euro ’000)

All figures exclude subsidiaries (CAA only)

Total revenues 181 811 184 849 195 809 8%En-route revenues 15 841 17 066 19 733 25%% En-route revenues 9% 9% 10 % ----Total assets 555 960 593 771 639 207 15%Total staff 1 766 1 852 1 872 6%Total ANS staff* n/a 612 675 n/aTotal ATCOs 234 231 264 13%Number of IFR flights 224 000 221 000 227 000 1%Number of IFR km 60 739 000 60 198 000 63 116 000 4%*Figures do not include administrative and financial supporting services staff


(M of TC)

CAA BOARD OF DIRECTORS (6 members)Chairman + 5 members

All members are appointed by the Council of State.(Chairman + 2 members are Executive Directors, 1 member

represents staff).DG of the CAA is not a member of the Board of Directors.

∙Director General of CAA: M. Talvitie∙Director of ANS Dept.: H. Jaakkola∙Deputy Director of ANS Dept.: M.-A. Nyberg

Civil Aviation Administration(CAA)

COUNCIL of STATE(Government)

Chaired by the Prime Minister

Air NavigationServices

(ANS) Dept.

AirportDept.

FlightSafety

Authority

Direction de la Navigation Aérienne (DNA) - Directorate of Air Navigation(DNA), Francewww.aviation-civile.gouv.fr


DNA is a division of DGAC.100% State-owned.


Air Navigation Directorate (DNA)- Airspace Regulation

DNA + DIRCAM - Economic Regulation

The Parliament votes each year the “Loi de Finances” theFrench budget, to which the Annex Budget for Civil Aviation(BAAC) is attached. Since 1995, a yearly BAAC assessmentreport is issued. The report reviews the balance of accounts,revenues and expenditures and contains an appraisal of thecurrent situation.As any French civil service administration, the DNA is subject torandom and frequent oversight from the “Cour des Comptes”.

Governance Structure (DNA) DNA

DIRECTOR OF DNA:H.-G. Baudry

DIRECTOR OF THE ATC OFFICE (SCTA):J.-Y. Delhaye

SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR DNA: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 5 ACCs (Paris, Bordeaux, Marseille, Brest, Reims)- controls both upper and lower airspace 11 APPs

66 TWRsSIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 0 AFIS 1 159 347 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (Ecu’000 1998 & Euro’000 1999-2000)

Total revenues 948 060 1 017 429 996 514 5%En-route revenues 770 130 826 484 799 771 4%% En-route revenues 81% 81% 80% ---Total assets 606 466 660 081 584 986 -4%Total staff for DNA 8 154 8 293 8 453 4%Total ATCOs 3 160 3 221 3 303 5%

Number of IFR flights 2 310 000 2 482 000 2 615 000 13%Number of IFR km 1 053 457 000 1 150 761 000 1 225 335 000 16%


Air Navigation Directorate (DNA)

Directoratefor Airspace

Military AirNavigationDirectorate(DIRCAM)

Air Traffic Control Office(SCTA)

∙ACCs∙APPs & TWRs∙Air Ops at Paris Airports

Minister of Infrastructure, Transport and Housing : J.C. Gayssot

EXECUTIVE BOARD (DNA)• Director of DNA: Henry-Georges Baudry• Director of SCTA: J.Y. Delhaye• Director of STNA: J.M. Faysse• Director of CENA: A. Printemps• Director of SIA: A. Grandclaude

Director General for Civil Aviation: P. Graff

Ministry of Equipment Transport andHousing

(M of ETH)

Air ForcesGeneral Directorate for Civil Aviation

(DGAC)

Technical Support Departments :

∙Air Nav. Technical Dept. (STNA)∙Air Nav. R. & D. Dept. (CENA)∙Aeronautical Information Dept. (SIA)

Civil Aviation Authority of the Former Yugoslav Republic ofMacedoniawww.dgca.gov.mk


Governmental department100% State-owned


Safety Dept. of Civil Aviation Authority

- Airspace RegulationATM Dept. of Civil Aviation Authority

- Economic RegulationGovernment, Civil Aviation Authority

Governance Structure CAA

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CAAMr. Mile Manolev

DIRECTOR OF ANS:Mr. Toni Prgomet

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- both GAT and OAT traffic 1 ACC ( Skopje )- controls both upper and lower airspace 2 APPs ( Skopje and Ohrid)

2 TWRs (Skopje and Ohrid)1 AFIS ( Skopje )

SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: about 25 333 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

currency(Euro)Total revenues n/a n/a 9 874 197 n/aEn-route revenues n/a 2 750 000 7 946 560 n/a%En-route revenues n/a n/a 80% ---Total assets n/a n/a 7 011 000 n/a Total staff n/a 252 260 n/aTotal ANS staff n/a 172 180 n/aTotal ATCOs n/a 84 90 n/aNumber of IFR flights n/a 43 000 98 000 n/aNumber of IFR km n/a 4 333 000 10 481 000 n/a


Communication

PublicEnterprise

for Airports

Government

Ministry ofDefence

Civil Aviation Authority (CAA)

Air Safety Legal,Navigation Department Financial, Services InternalDepartment Affairs

Department

• Minister of Transport and Communication

• Director General of the CAA, appointed by theGovernment of the Republic of Macedonia

• Director for ANS department, appointed by theDirector General of the CAA

DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH, Germany, (DFS)www.dfs.de

Institutional arrangements and links STATUS:

Limited liability company as of 1993, governed byPrivate Company Law .100% State-owned.Integrated civil/military ANSP.


Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing

- Airspace RegulationFederal Ministry of Transport, BuildingAnd Housing

- Charges RegulationFederal Ministry of Transport, Building andHousing

Corporate Governance Structure DFS

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD: Dr. Hans-Juergen Froböse

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO): Dieter Kaden

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- both GAT and OAT traffic 1 UAC (Karlsruhe)- controls both upper and lower airspace, except GAT 2 ACCs/UACs/APPs (Berlin, München) for the upper airspace in North-Western Germany 3 ACCs/APPs (Bremen, Düsseldorf, Langen)

1 ACC for OAT in upper airspace in North-Western Germany (co-located with Maastricht UAC)

SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 17 TWRs386 421km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98Currency (Euro ’000)Total revenues 884 900 898 900 894 038 1%En-route revenues 554 300 551 100 567 339 2%% En-route revenues 63% 61% 63% ---Total assets 1 181 318 1 156 761 1 244 127 5%

Total staff 4 990 5 079 5 214 4%Total ATCOs 1 510 1 570 1 597 6%Number IFR flights 2 340 000 2 479 000 2 639 000 13%Number IFR km 718 614 000 758 465 000 811 748 000 13%

DFS

FederalMinistry of

Defence(M of D)

Federal Ministry ofTransport, Building and

Housing(M of TBH)

EXECUTIVE BOARD (4 Members)CEO + 3 Members


JointMinisterial

Steering Group

SHAREHOLDER Meeting with M of TBH

SUPERVISORY BOARD (12 Members)Chairman + 11 Members

Chairman appointed by the Government.Members represent: 3 (including Chairman) M of TBH,

2 M of D, 1 M of F, 6 staff reps.Chairman has a casting vote.

Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority (HCAA), Greece n/a


Government department100% State-owned


Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority

- Airspace RegulationAir Navigation Airspace Committee

- Economic RegulationMinistry of Finance is responsible for HCAA Budget

Governance Structure (2002) HCAA

DIRECTOR GENERAL (GOVERNOR) OF HCAA:Athanasios Tzoganis

DEPUTY GOVERNOR FOR AIR NAVIGATION:Dimitrios Theodoropoulos

DIRECTOR OF ATS DIVISION:Theodoros Passas

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 2 ACCs ( Athens, Makedonia )- controls both upper and lower airspace 13 APPs- owns and operates 41 airports 25 TWRs

20 AFISSIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 533 300 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

currency(GDR’000)

Average exchange rate for 2000: 2,97 EURO = 1000 GDRTotal revenues 108 080 993 116 976 034 135 004 663 25%En-route revenues 22 364 533 18 258 001 25 667 499 15%% En-route revenues 21 % 16 % 19 % ---Total assets n/a n/a n/a n/aTotal staff 2 900 2 980 3 514 21%Total ANS staff 1 101 1 151 1 230 12%Total ATCOs 510 560 631 24%

Number IFR flights 370 000 417 000 457 000 24%Number IFR km 193 433 000 208 168 000 235 994 000 22%

Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority ( HCAA )

Air Administrative AirNavigation Support TransportDirectorate Directorate Directorate


Communications( M of TC )

Ministry ofDefence

( M of D )

3 Deputy Governors in charge of each Directorate:• D. Theodoropoulos• A. Hrysafinos• A. Souladakis

Governor HCCA: A. F. General A. Tzoganis

AirNavigationAirspace

Committee- Reps from

HCAA,Hellenic AF

General Staff

Air Navigation Directorate:• Director of ATS Division: Theodoros Passas• Director of Telecoms Division: Th. Kounoupas• Director of Electronics Division: K. Kyriakakis• Director of El. Instal. & Applic.Center: Ch. Marmaras• Director of Flight Inspection Unit:

HungaroControl – Hungarian Air Navigation Serviceswww.hungarocontrol.hu

Institutional arrangements and links (as of 2002)

STATUS: HungaroControl has been set up in January 2002

from split of LRI Air Traffic and Airport Admin.HungaroControl is a State Enterprise100 % State-owned


M of E & T and MoD

- Airspace RegulationHungarian Parliament, Govt., M of E & T and MoD

- Economic RegulationM of E & T

Corporate Governance Structure (as of 2002) HungaroControl

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:

N/A

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Mr. István Mudra

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 1 ACC ( Budapest )- controls both upper and lower airspace 1 APP (Budapest)

1 TWR (LHBP) SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 93 000 km2 1 FIS (Budapest)

2 AFIS (regional aerodromes: LHSM, LHDC)

Note: All Figures relate to LRI - Air Traffic and Airport Administration of Hungary

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency(HUF’000)

Average exchange rate for 2000: 3,85 Euro = 1 000 HUF

Total revenues 23 948 220 28 089 983 28 162 571 18%En-route revenues 8 583 596 8 908 607 10 357 795 21%% En-route revenues 36 % 32 % 37 % ---Total assets 62 813 380 70 686 351 73 810 151 18%Total staff (LRI) 2 543 2 744 2 700 6%Total ANS staff 690 695 700 1%Total ATCOs 193 193 182 -6%Number of IFR flights 419 000 421 000 433 000 3%Number of IFR km 104 409 000 104 598 000 107 108 000 3%

NationalAirspace

Co-ordinationCommittee(NACC)

EXECUTIVE BOARD(N/A)

CEO is appointed by the Minister of M of E & T

Ministry ofHome

Defence( MoD )

SUPERVISORY BOARDSupervisory functions are exercised by the DeputySecretary of State for Transport at M of E & T

Ministry ofEconomy and

Transport( M of E & T )

GeneralDirectorate ofCivil Aviation

RegionalAirport

Operators

BudapestAirportHungaroControl


Irish Aviation Authority (IAA), Irelandwww.iaa.ie


Commercial company as of 1994 governed byCompanies Acts, 1963 to 1990.100% State-owned (Minister for Finance).


Safety Regulation Division

- Airspace Regulation Safety Regulation Division

- Economic RegulationCommission for Aviation Regulation (establishedunder the Aviation Regulation Act in 2001).The Act requires the Commission to make adetermination specifying the maximum levels ofterminal navigation charges.

Corporate Governance Structure IAA

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF AUTHORITY:Donal J. Geaney

CEO :Brian D. McDonnell

DIRECTOR OF ANS DIVISION:C. McNamee

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 2 ACCs (Dublin, Shannon)- controls both upper and lower airspace 3 APPs (Dublin, Shannon, Cork)- provides Oceanic ANS 3 TWRs (Dublin, Shannon, Cork)

0 AFIS SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 467 300 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (Euro ’000) Total revenues 74 275 76 282 75 508 2%En-route revenues 47 324 50 573 49 314 4%% En-route revenues 64% 66% 65% ---Total assets 71 175 67 292 75 960 7%

Total staff 642 654 675 5%Total ATCOs 244 250 269 10%Number IFR flights * 412 000 444 000 467 000 13%NumberIFR km* 117 151 000 128 897 000 135 705 000 16%

* Continental

Irish Aviation Authority

Safety ANS Regulation Division Division

Ministry ofPublic

Enterprise(M of PE)

BOARD OF THE AUTHORITY (9 members)Chairman + CEO + 7 members

Chairman and other members are appointed by the Mof PE with the consent of M of F.

Board appoints CEO after consultation with M of PE

Ministry ofDefence

Ministry ofFinance(M of F)

Departmentof PublicEnterprise

Commissionfor AviationRegulationStanding Civil

Military ANSCommittee

Ente Nazionale di Assistenza al Volo (ENAV S.p.A.)Company for Air Navigation Services, Italywww.enav.it

Institutional arrangements and links (2001) STATUS:Joint-Stock Public Corporation as of 2000 under contract management.100% State-owned by Ministry of Economy.


Italian Civil Aviation Agency (ENAC) andMinistry of Infrastructure and Transport (M of IT)

- Airspace Regulation Department of Civil Aviation, ENAV S.p.A.,Italian Air Force, Civil Aviation Agency

- Economic RegulationMinistry of Infrastructure and Transportreviews annually ANS charges in co-operation

with Ministry of Economy and Ministry of Defence.

Corporate Governance Structure (2001) ENAV

PRESIDENT AND CHAIRMAN OF THEADMINISTRATION BOARD:Dott. Giulio Spano

MANAGING DIRECTOR (MD):Ing. Sandro Gualano

DIRECTOR GENERAL (COO):Ing. Fabio Marzocca

CO-DIRECTOR GENERAL:Col. Salvatore Metrangolo

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 4 ACCs (Milan, Padua, Rome, Brindisi)- controls both upper and lower airspace 19 APPs

25 TWRsSIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 14 AFIS 726 500 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (Euro ‘000)

Total revenues 463 895 522 993 521 595 12% En-route revenues 347 800 387 323 400 785 15%% En-route revenues 75% 74% 77% --- Total assets 1 389 178 1 560 873 1 707 970 23% Total staff 3 240 3 255 3 234 0%Total ATCOs 1 590 1 545 1 589 0%Number IFR flights 1 172 000 1 372 000 1 449 999 24%Number IFR km 495 436 000 602 961 000 615 965 000 24%

Department ofCivil Aviation

Italian CivilAviation Authority

(ENAC)

ADMINISTRATION BOARD (8 members)Chairman + MD + 6 members

Board appointed by the Ministry of Economy in consultation withthe M. of IT, from a list of experts in civil aviation matters. TheBoard delegates its executive power to one of its members who isappointed as Managing Director. The MD then appoints theDirector General in charge of all operational and co-ordinationunits who acts as a Chief Operating Officer (COO) or CEO.In case the Director General is not appointed as CEO, the ManagingDirector operates both as M.D. and CEO.

Company for AirNavigation Services

(ENAV S.p.A.)

DG (COO or CEO)DG-COO applies the Administration Board decisions to guaranteesupervision, monitoring and co-ordination of the operationalstructure. A Co-Director General assists the DG. A Board ofDirectors (4 directors) advises the DG.

Managing Director

Ministry of Defence(M of D)

OperationalCo-ordination

Committee(CCO)

Government chaired by the Prime Minister

Ministry ofInfrastructure and

Transport(M of IT)

NationalAgency for

Flight Safety(ANSV)

Malta International Airport plc (MIA), Maltawww.maltairport.com

Organisational Structure (2001) STATUS:Government-owned company since 1991 (Registrationno. C12663). As of May 1998 MIA became the ANSP.Previously ANS had been provided by DCAM withpersonnel of the Armed Forces of Malta.In March 2001, the Govt. set up a new company,Malta Air Traffic Services Ltd (Reg. no. C 27965) whichbecame responsible for ANS provision as of Jan. 2002.


Department of Civil Aviation- Airspace Regulation

Department of Civil Aviation- Economic Regulation

Department of Civil Aviation

MIA Corporate Governance Structure (2001) MIA

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Lawrence Zammit

EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN (CEO) OF MIA:Lawrence Zammit

DIRECTOR OF THE ATS DIVISION:Lawrence Fenech

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:-controls both upper and lower airspace 1 ACC (Malta East and Malta West)-controls portions of airspace delegated 1 APP (Malta) to Malta ACC by Rome ACC 1 TWR (Luqa)-MIA is also the aerodrome and terminal operator

SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 215 000km2

Year 1998* 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (LM)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 2, 47 Euro=1 ML Total revenues n/a 13 044 760 15 837 553 n/a En-route revenues 3 214 000 2 948 964 3 390 749 5%% En-route revenues n/a 23% 21% ---Total assets n/a 26 386 319 28 613 002 n/a

Total staff n/a 767 755 n/aTotal ANS Staff n/a 276 269 n/aTotal ATCOs 41 40 40 -2%Number of IFR flights 49 100 56 500 60 400 23%Number of IFR km 12 998 000 13 959 000 13 448 000 3%

*Figures for 1998 relate to DCAM’s ANS Division


(M of TC)

Department of CivilAviation Malta

(DCAM)

BOARD of DIRECTORS (4 members)Chairman + 3 Directors

Members appointed by the Government,representing the M of ED.

The Chairman acts as CEO.

Ministry ofEconomic

Development(M of ED)

∙ Executive Chairman (CEO)The Board of Directors appoints the CEO.

Malta International Airport plc (MIA)

Malta Air Traffic Airport ServicesDivision Division

Moldavian Air Traffic Services Authority (MOLDATSA),Republic of Moldovawww.moldatsa.md


State enterprise since 1994 (by GovernmentRegulation Nr.3 from 12.01.1994).100% State-owned.


Civil Aviation Administration

- Airspace RegulationCivil Aviation Administration

- Economic RegulationCivil Aviation Administration

Corporate Governance Structure MOLDATSA


DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO) : Valerian Vartic

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- both GAT and OAT traffic 2 ACCs (Chisinau 1, above FL285; Chisinau 2, FL055-FL285)- controls both upper and lower airspace 1 APP (Chisina) 3 TWRs (Chisinau, Balti, Cahul)SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 37 517 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (MDL)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 89,775 Euro = 1 000 MDL Total revenues 11 486 470 21 051 481 23 203 151 102%En-route revenues 7 512 150 13 688 235 15 012 445 100%%En-route revenues 65% 65% 65% ---

Total assets 31 456 803 35 979 673 38 246 544 22%

Total staff 306 308 308 1% Total ATCOs 75 75 78 4%

Number of IFR flights 18 395 15 982 16 092 -13% Number of IFR km 3 173 967 2 619 583 2 550 177 -20%

Civil AviationAdministration

AirportOperator

Civil Aviation Administration �Director General of CAA: Ion Matei�Director ATS division: Konstantin Somov

� Director General of MOLDATSA: Valerian VarticDG is appointed by the DG of the CAA.

GOVERNMENT

MOLDATSAAircraftOperator

Ministry ofDefenceAviation

Department

Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre (MUAC), EUROCONTROLwww.eurocontrol.int

Institutional arrangements and links STATUS: EUROCONTROL: International Organisation established

under the EUROCONTROL Convention of 13.12.1960 and amended on 12.2.1981.At the request of the Benelux States and Germany, MUAC isoperated as a EUROCONTROL Agency’s Service according tothe Maastricht Agreements of 25.11.1986.

AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE FOR: - Safety RegulationUnder Article 1.2 of the Maastricht Agreements, each of the 4States retains its competence and obligations in respect ofregulations.

- Airspace RegulationThe MCG determines a common position for the 4 States in allmatters relating to the operation of ATS by MUAC concerning,inter alia, airspace organisation and sectorisation.

- Economic RegulationFinancial arrangements for the exploitation of MUAC areadopted by the Committee of Management.EUROCONTROL DG seeks approval of the budget, whichcontains a special budgetary Annex for MUAC, with thePermanent Commission.

Governance Structure MUAC

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF EUROCONTROL:Victor Aguado

DIRECTOR OF MUAC:Arnold Vandenbroucke

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- Controls GAT in the upper airspace (>FL245) 1 ACC ( Maastricht )above Benelux and North-Western Germany.- A German ATC unit responsible for handling OATabove North-Western Germany andmanaged by the DFS is co-located at MUAC.


Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (Euro ’000)Total revenues 76 220 82 679 88 759 16%En-route revenues 72 406 78 382 84 509 17%%En-route revenues 95% 95% 95% ---Total assets 68 713 70 792 73 913 8% Total staff 518 534 567 9%Total ATCOs 170 172 186 9%

Number IFR flights 1 058 091 1 110 248 1 184 739 12%Number IFR km 307 244 985 322 390 163 343 344 333 12%

EUROCONTROLAgency

Maastricht UpperArea Control

Centre (MUAC)

MCG

PermanentCommission of

EUROCONTROL

Permanent Commissionof EUROCONTROL

Director General of EUROCONTROL

Director of MUAC

Maastricht Co-ordination Group(MCG)

Senior officials from Belgium, TheNetherlands, Luxembourg, Germany.

EUROCONTROLCommittee of

Management (CoM)

CoM

Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland (LVNL), The Netherlandswww.lvnl.nl

Institutional arrangements and links (as of July 2001)

STATUS: Corporate Entity as of 1993 (by Air Traffic Law).

100% State ownership.


General Directorate of Civil Aviation (DGL)

- Airspace RegulationGeneral Directorate of Civil Aviation (DGL)

- Economic RegulationGeneral Directorate of Civil Aviation (DGL)

Corporate Governance Structure LVNL

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Lieutenant-General H. J. W. Manderfeld (retired)

CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD (CEO)G .H. Kroese

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 1 ACC (Amsterdam)- controls lower airspace up to FL 245 4 APPs (Schiphol, Rotterdam, Eelde, Beek)

4 TWRs (Schiphol, Rotterdam, Eelde, Beek)SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 1 AFIS 90 324 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (NLG ’000)

Exchange rate: 0,45 Euro = 1 NLG Total revenues 308 715 338 162 362 189 17%En-route revenues 175 848 198 180 211 515 20%(for Dutch airspace)% En-route revenues 57% 59% 58% ---Total assets 564 679 539 033 553 611 -2%Total staff 872 879 913 5%Total ATCOs 197 207 216 10%Number of IFR flights 500 000 520 000 550 000 10%( controlled by LVNL) Number of IFR flights* 854 000 938 000 986 000 15%Number of IFR km* 138 367 000 150 559 000 159 843 000 16%

*in Dutch airspace

SUPERVISORY DIRECTORS BOARD (5 Members)Chairman + 4 Members4 Members representing:

Ministry of DefenceDutch scheduled airlines (KLM)Dutch charter airlines (Transavia)

Dutch airports (Amsterdam Schiphol)

EXECUTIVE BOARD (3 Members)Chairman + 2 members

Executive Board is appointed by the M of TPWWM,on the recommendation of the Supervisory Board.

LVNL

Ministry of Transport, Public Worksand Water Management (M of TPWWM)

Transport, Communication,Public Works Inspectorate(IVW)

General Directorateof Civil Aviation(DGL)

LuftfartsverketNorwegian Air Traffic and Airport Management (NATAM), Norwaywww.luftfartsverket.no


State Enterprise separated from CAA as of January 2000.100% State-owned.Integrated civil/military ANSP.


Civil Aviation Authority Norway

subsidiaries - Airspace RegulationCivil Aviation Authority Norway

- Economic RegulationAeronautic charges are set annually by the Ministry ofTransport and Communications and the Parliament(Stortinget).

Corporate Governance Structure NATAM

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Erlend Rian

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Randi R. S. Flesland

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- both GAT and OAT traffic 4 ATCCs: Oslo ATCC (Area, Approach)- controls both upper and lower airspace Trondheim ATCC (Area)- NATAM owns and operates 45 airports, Stavanger ATCC (Area) 14 in association with Armed Forces Bodo ATCC (Area, Approach, Oceanic)- Oceanic ANS 17 TWRs/APPs (combined)

3 TWRsSIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 33 AFISTotal: 2 079 007 km2

- Continental: 706 007 km2

- Oceanic: 1 319 000 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (NOK’000)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 0,123 Euro = 1 NOKAll figures exclude subsidiariesTotal revenues 3 048 610 2 486 171 2 350 248 -23%En-route revenues 435 854 484 349 487 085 12%% En-route revenues 14% 19% 21% ---

Total assets 11 511 655 11 923 184 12 357 690 7%Total staff 2 328 2 405 2 337 0%Total ANS staff n/a n/a n/a ---Total ATCOs 365 377 398 9%Number IFR flights 462 000 478 000 438 000 -5%Number IFR km 109 893 000 121 743 000 115 876 000 5%

Civil AviationAuthorityNorway( CAA )

Ministry of Transport and Communications(M of TC)


Members represent: 5 M of TC, 2 staff.

EXECUTIVE BOARD (13 Members)CEO + 12 members

CEO appointed by M of TC.

NATAM

Air Navigation Airports Services

OsloAirport

( OSL AS)

Nordic AviationResources ( NAR )

AirportParkings( LPAS )

Navegação Aérea de Portugal E.P. (NAV, EP), Portugalwww.nav.pt


Public Entity Corporation as of December 1998.100% State-owned


National Institute of Civil Aviation (INAC) - Airspace Regulation

INAC+FAP (Portuguese Air Force) +NAV,EP in closepermanent co-ordination.

- Economic RegulationNational Institute of Civil Aviation (INAC)

Corporate Governance Structure (2002) NAV, EP

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION: Major Carlos Gonçalves da Costa

There is neither CEO nor COO within NAV,EP.

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 2 ACCs (Lisboa, Santa Maria)- controls both upper and lower airspace 7 TMAs (Lisboa, Porto, Faro, Madeira, Ponta Delgada, Santa Maria, Horta)- provides both continental and oceanic ANS 10 TWRs (Lisboa, Cascais, Porto, Faro, Funchal, Porto Santo, Ponta Delgada,

Santa Maria, Horta, Flores)SIZE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 5 810 318 km2 - Continental: 683 683 km2

- Oceanic: 5 126 635 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (PTE’000)

Exchange rate:4,99Euro =1000 PTENAV EP + ANA NAV EP NAV EP

Total revenues 54 956 267 24 516 763 32 704 735 n/aEn-route revenues 17 229 000 20 219 000 27 521 000 n/a% En-route revenues 31% 82% 84% --- Total assets 146 297 209 28 129 521 36 392 531 n/aTotal staff 2 432 986 1 009 n/aTotal ATCOs 316 299 293 -7%

Number of IFR flights- Lisboa FIR 276 000 311 300 322 500 17%- Santa Maria FIR 82 000 92 000 96 000 17%Number of IFR km- Lisboa FIR 119 679 000 136 341 000 141 699 000 18%- Santa Maria FIR 101 235 000 117 045 000 125 086 000 24%

Ministry ofTransport (M of T)

BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION (5 members)Chairman + 4 members

∙ All members are appointed by M of T for a 3 year term.Each member has executive functions within NAV,EP. Eachmember is responsible to supervise one or several NAV,EPDirectorates and Advisory Bodies to the Board. There are 7Directorates and 6 Advisory Bodies.∙ There is neither CEO nor COO within NAV,EP.Note: NAV,EP has also a Board of Auditors composed by 3members which are appointed by M of T for a 3 year term.

Secretary ofTransport

Airports ofPortugal

(ANA SA)

National Institutefor Civil Aviation

(INAC)

Ministry ofFinance

(M of F)

Aircraft AccidentPrevention andInvestigation

(GPIAA)

Air Navigation ofPortugal

NAV, EP

Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration (ROMATSA),Romaniawww.romatsa.ro


Autonomous and self-financing organisation as of 1991(Government Resolution GR74/1991 and GR731/1992).100% State-owned.


Ministry of Public Works, Transport and Housing.Enforcement and safety oversight is delegated anddischarged through the RCAA.

- Airspace RegulationBoth Ministry of Public Works, Transport and Housingand Ministry of Defence, and discharged through theRCAA and Air Force Staff.

- Economic RegulationMinistry of Public Works, Transport and Housing

Corporate Governance Structure (2001) ROMATSA

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Marin Voicu

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Marin Voicu

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:-only GAT traffic 1 ACC (Bucharest + 2 secondary locations - Arad and-control both upper and lower airspace Constanta)

1 APP17 TWRs

SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE:250 000km2 1 AFIS

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (Euro ’000)Total revenues 78 568 122 126 104 859 33%En-route revenues 66 648 108 550 89 689 35%% En-route revenues 85% 89% 86% ---Total assets 170 732 220 621 245 098 44% Total staff 1 919 1 940 1 908 -1%Total ATCOs 556 546 540 - 3%Number of IFR flights 247 835 376 293 300 500 21%Number of IFR km 112 928 000 173 496 000 137 950 000 22%

Ministry of Public Works, Transport andHousing (M of PWTH)

General Directorate of Air Transportand Airports

ADMINISTRATION BOARD (15 voting members)Chairman + 14 members

Chairman is the CEOMembers represent: 11 M of PWTH, 1 M of F, 1 RCAA, 1

Polytechnic University, 1 M of D.There are also additional non voting members representing staff.

EXECUTIVE BOARD (7 Members)DG + 6 Members

DG is appointed by the M of PWTH.

Civil Aviation Authority ofRomania (RCAA)


AirspaceManagement

Council

Airports Operator(4 major airports under

responsibility of the M of PWTH +13 airports under local authorities)

ROMATSA

Letové Prevádzkové Služby Slovenskej Republiky, Státny Podnik (LPSSR), Slovak Republicwww.lps.sk


State owned enterprise as of January 2000.100% State-owned.



- Airspace RegulationMinistry of Transport, Posts and Telecommunications

- Economic RegulationMinistry of Transport, Posts and Telecommunications

Corporate Governance Structure LPS SR

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD: Jan Kaššák

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO): Roman Bíro

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- GAT and OAT traffic in ACC 1 ACC (Bratislava)- controls both upper and lower airspace 4 APPs (Bratislava, Kosice, Poprad , Sliac)

6 TWRs (Bratislava, Kosice, Piestany, Poprad, Sliac, Zilina)6 AROs (Bratislava, Kosice, Piestany, Poprad, Sliac, Zilina)


Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98Currency (SKK’000) )

Average exchange rate in 2000: 23,5 Euro = 1000 SKKTotal revenues 843 792 1 303 518 961 997 14%En-route revenues 783 289 1 241 003 859 351 10%% En-route revenues 93% 95% 89% ---Total assets 1 833 310 2 225 491 1 899 152 4%Total staff 505 513 511 1%Total ATCOs 133 136 136 2%

Number IFR flights 144 000 210 000 177 000 23%Number of IFR km 23 817 000 36 232 000 28 463 000 20%


Ministryof

Defence(M of D)

Inter-MinisterialCommission

Defence-Transports

SUPERVISORY BOARD (9 members )Chairman + 8 members

Members represent: 4 M of TPT (Chairman+3), 1 M of F, 2 staffreps., 1 Finance Director LPS SR, 1 trade union association rep.

Chairman is also the DG of the Division of Civil Aviation.


The CEO is appointed by M of TPT.

Air TrafficServices of the

Slovak Republic(LPS SR)

SlovakAirport

Authority(SSL)

Ministry ofTransport, Posts andTelecommunications

( M of TPT )

- Division of CivilAviation

Uprava Republike Slovenije za Civilno Letalstvo (URSCL)Civil Aviation Authority of the Republic of Slovenia (CAAS)Air Navigation Services Department, Sloveniawww.caa-rs.si


Government agency (body within the Ministry ofTransport).CAAS combines an ANSP and regulatory part.The Traffic Inspectorate and the CAO are responsible forsupervising the activities of the CAAS.


Ministry of Transport

- Airspace Regulation Ministry of Transport

- Economic RegulationMinistry of Finance

Corporate Governance Structure CAAS


DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CAAS:Milan Krajnc

ACTING DIRECTOR OF ANS DEPARTMENT:Srecko Jansa

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 1 ACC (Ljubljana)- ANS in both upper and lower airspace 3 APPs (Ljubljana, Portoroz, Maribor)- ATS above FL 125 are delegated to Vienna in 3 TWRs (Ljubljana, Portoroz, Maribor) MURA sector

SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 20 273km²

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (SIT’000)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 4,9 Euro = 1 000 SITTotal revenues 1 557 237 1 022 946 2 238 402 44%En-route revenues 1 557 237 1 022 946 2 238 402 44%% En-route revenues 100% 100% 100% ---Total assets* n/a n/a 10 355 331 n/aTotal staff 148 151 157 6%Total ANS dept. staff 125 127 126 1%Total ATCOs 84 90 90 7%Number of IFR flights 147 749 99 460 183 076 24%Number of IFR km 12 141 000 8 229 000 15 984 000 32%

* Total Assets of CAAS were included in the Total Assets of the Ministry of Transport up to 1999.

•Director General CAAS : Milan Krajnc•Acting Director of ANS dept: Srecko Jansa

DG of CAAS is appointed by the Government asproposed by the Minister of Transport.

Ministry of Transport(M of T)

Civil Aviation Authority (CAAS)

• Minister of Transport: Jakob Presecnik

TrafficInspectorate

Civil AviationOffice (CAO)

GeneralDepartment

AirNavigation

ServiceDepartment

Safety andAviationStandards

Department

Aeropuertos Españoles y Navegación Aérea (AENA), Spainwww.aena.es


Business Public Entity attached to Ministry of DevelopmentA company with specific status (governed by Private Law,except when acting in its administrative capacity).

100% State-owned.


Spanish Civil Aviation Authority - Government

- Airspace RegulationSpanish Civil Aviation Authority - Government

- Economic RegulationGovernment

Corporate Governance Structure AENA

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:José Eladio Seco

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO) OF AENA:José Eladio Seco

DIRECTOR OF AIR NAVIGATION:Gaspar de Vicente González

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 4 ACCs (Barcelona, Madrid, Canarias, Sevilla)- controls both upper and lower airspace 9 APPs- operates 43 airports in Spain 34 TWRs

0 AFIS

SIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 2 287 023 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98currency (Euro ’000)

Total ANS revenues* 341 118 405 810 517 846 52%En-route revenues 309 378 335 888 403 944 31%% En-route revenues 91% 83% 78 % ---Total assets** 476 627 479 062 525 252 10%Total AENA staff 9 181 9 216 9 242 1%Total ANS staff 2 758 2 849 3 016 9%Total ATCOs 1 496 1 567 1 674 12%Number of IFR flights 1 135 280 1 257 480 1 361 007 20%Number of IFR km 539 021 407 592 439 395 632 404 553 17%

* from services provision** As AENA does not have independent accounts for the Air Navigation Directorate, figures relate to an estimatedbalance for air navigation.

Ministry ofDevelopment( M of Dev. )

Ministry ofDevelopment

Under-secretariat

Spanish CivilAviation Authority

(DGAC)

Secretariat of State forInfrastructures

AENA

Airports Air Navigation


Members are appointed by the M of Dev.Chairman is the CEO.

EXECUTIVE BOARD (15 Members)CEO + 14 members

CEO appointed by the M of Dev.

LuftfartsverketSwedish Civil Aviation Administration (LFV), Swedenwww.lfv.se


Public Authority.100% state-owned.Provides integrated civil/military integrated ANS.LFV also operates airports.


Aviation Safety Department (within LFV)

- Airspace RegulationAviation and Public Sector Department (within LFV)

- Economic RegulationThe Government and Parliament set the LFV’s overalllong-term target on return on equity (after tax) of 8%,and an equity/assets ratio of 25%

Corporate Governance Structure LFV

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Ulf Adelsohn

DIRECTOR GENERAL:Lars Rekke

DIRECTOR OF THE ANS DIVISION:Lennart Jönsson

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- both GAT and OAT traffic 3 ACCs (Stockholm, Sundsvall, Malmö)- controls both upper and lower airspace 10 APPs- LFV owns 14 airports and operates 19 airports 36 TWRs

1 AFIS


Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (SEK’000)

Average exchange rate for 2000: 0,11 Euro = 1 SEKAll figures exclude subsidiaries and associated companies (only State Enterprise)

LFV Total revenues 4 326 000 4 578 000 4 806 000 11%ANS Division revenues 1 257 000 1 411 000 1 452 000 16%En-route revenues 882 000 941 000 1 001 000 13%% En-route revenues* 70% 67% 69% ---

LFV Total assets 7 319 000 8 221 000 9 876 000 35%ANS Division assets 1 100 625 1 390 526 1 507 702 37%

LFV Total staff 3 493 3 576 3 687 6%ANS Division staff 1 199 1 220 1 229 3%Total ATCOs 659 681 666 1%

Number IFR flights 610 000 625 000 633 000 4%Number IFR km 198 078 000 208 836 000 214 040 000 8%

* % calculated against ANS Division revenues.

Ministry ofIndustry,

Employment andCommunications

(M of IEC)

SUPERVISORY BOARD (10 members)Chairman + DG + 8 members

8 members (Chairman + DG + 6 members) are appointed by theGovernment; 2 members are appointed by Trade Unions.

EXECUTIVE BOARD (8 members)DG + 7 members

DG appointed by the Government.

Civil Aviation Administration (LFV)

Aviation Aviation Safety and Dept Public (reporting to Sectorthe M of IEC) Dept.

Airport AirDivisions Navigation (4) Services Division

Skyguide, Switzerlandwww.skyguide.ch


Joint-stock company as of 1996.Currently there are 14 shareholders; 99,85% isheld by the Swiss Confederation which by lawmust hold at least 51%.Integrated civil/military as of 2001


Federal Office for Civil Aviation

- Airspace RegulationFederal Office for Civil Aviation

- Economic RegulationThe Ministry of the Environment, Transport,Energy and Communications

Corporate Governance Structure (as of Jan. 2001) SKYGUIDE

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Franz Kellerhals

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Alain Rossier

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- both GAT and OAT traffic 2 ACCs (Geneva, Zurich)- controls both upper and lower airspace 2 APPs (Geneva, Zurich)- ATC services delegated to Geneva ACC 4 TWRs (Geneva, Zurich, Lugano, Bern) by France 4 AFIS (Geneva, Zurich, Lugano, Bern)


Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (CHF’000)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 1 Euro = 1,556 CHF Total revenues 257 712 265 174 275 941 7%En-route revenues 174 707 179 328 187 091 7%% En-route revenues 68% 68% 68% ---Total assets 232 486 243 727 242 260 4%Total staff 900 983 1 057 17%Total ATCOs 324 336 343 6%

Number IFR flights 936 400 972 100 1 069 500 14%Number IFR km 104 929 000 109 720 000 116 859 000 11%


Federal Officefor Civil Aviation

(FOCA)

SKYGUIDE

Ministry ofEnvironment,

Transport,Energy and

Communications(M of ETEC)

EXECUTIVE BOARD (8 Members)CEO + 7 Members

The CEO is appointed by the Supervisory Board.

SUPERVISORY BOARD (7 Members)Chairman + 6 Members

All members are appointed by the General Assembly fortheir expertise.

Swiss Air Force(Swiss AF)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY of the Shareholders

Devlet Hava Meydanlari İşletmesi Genel MüdürlüğüGeneral Directorate of State Airports Authority - (DHMI)Air Navigation Division, Turkeywww.dhmi.gov.tr


STATUS: Autonomous State body.

100% State-owned.


Directorate General of Civil Aviation

- Airspace RegulationGeneral Directorate of DHMI

- Economic RegulationGeneral Directorate of DHMI

Corporate Governance Structure DHMI

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD:Mr. Mahmut Tekin

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO):Mr. Mahmut Tekin

DIRECTOR ANS DIVISION:Mr. Mustafa Kiliç

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- both GAT and OAT traffic. 2 ACCs (Ankara, Istanbul)- controls both upper and lower airspace. 17 APPs- responsible for administration of 34 State airports 34 TWRs

11 AISSIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE:

1 206 000 km²

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

currency(Euro’000) Total revenues 316 315 308 681 310 606 -2%En-route revenues 159 323 181 156 164 537 3%% En-route revenues 50% 59% 53% ---

Total assets 501 609 600 458 803 280 60%Total staff 5 131 5 703 5 822 13%Total ANS division staff* 2 822 2 926 2 912 3%Total ATCOs 415 425 455 10%Number of IFR flights 470 000 447 000 481 000 2%Number of IFR km 246 528 000 244 259 000 255 102 000 3%

*Including common ATS staff

DirectorateGeneral of Civil

Aviation

DHMI

ANS AirportsDivision Division


Communications( M of TC )

Ministry ofDefence

( M of D )

Civil MilitaryCo-ordination

Group

PrimeMinistrySenior

Audit Board

SUPERVISORY BOARD (6 members)Chairman+5 members

3 members represent DHMI, 2 represent the M ofTC, 1 represents the Turkish Treasury. The

Chairman is the CEO.

EXECUTIVE BOARDDirector General (CEO) + 3 Deputy

Director Generals and affiliated units.CEO is appointed by the M of TC.

National Air Traffic Services Ltd (UK NATS), United Kingdomwww.nats.co.uk


Public Private Partnership as of 2001.- 49% State-owned (Govt retains a Golden Share).- 51% private-owned (46% by the Airline Group and 5% by UK NATS employees).The Airline Group comprises 7 UK airlines: BA,Virgin Atlantic, British Midland, EasyJet,Airtours International Airways, BritanniaAirways and Monarch Airlines.


UK CAA, Safety Regulation Group (SRG)

- Airspace RegulationUK CAA, Directorate of Airspace Policy (DAP)

- Economic RegulationUK CAA, Economic Regulation Group (ERG)which sets charges through a formula linked tothe Retail Price Index (RPI) where “RPI minusX” targets for En-route and Oceanic Charges areset for 5 years at a time.

Corporate Governance Structure for NATS Holdings UK NATS

CHAIRMAN OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD: Dr. Chris Gibson-Smith

DIRECTOR GENERAL (CEO): Richard Everitt

SCOPE OF SERVICES: OPERATIONAL ATS UNITS:- only GAT traffic 3 ACCs (London, Manchester, Scottish)- controls both upper and lower airspace 1 OAC (Shanwick)- oceanic ANS 11 APPsSIZE OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: 14 TWRsTotal: 2 985 000 km2 2 AFIS

- Continental: 982 118 km2

- Oceanic: 2 200 000 km2

Year 1998 1999 2000 00/98

Currency (£’000)

Average exchange rate in 2000: 1,642 Euro = 1£All figures at 31 March, except*

Total revenues 535 012 552 046 568 072 6% En-route revenues 439 290 448 985 463 107 5%% En-route revenues 82% 81% 82% ---

Total assets 702 800 703 500 731 100 4% Total staff 5 150 5 293 5 414 5% Total ATCOs n/a 1 796 1 858 --- Number IFR flights 1 703 000 1 828 000 1 943 000 14% Number IFR km* 584 354 000 620 898 000 655 760 000 12%

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE of NATS Ltd (7 members)CEO + 6 executive directors

The current CEO was appointed by the Airline Group.

Department for,Transport, LocalGovernment and

The Regions(DTLR)

Private owners

The Airline UK NATS Group Employees

Ministryof

Defence(M of D)

UK CAA

• SRG• ERG• DAP

NATS Holdings

NATS En-route Limited(NERL)

Regulatory subsidiary forEn-route and Oceanic ANS

NATS ServicesLimited (NSL)Terminal ANS +New Business

JointANS

Council(JANSC)

STAKEHOLDERSCOUNCIL

Reps of M of D +DTLR + various partsof aviation industry(e.g. Air Transp UsersCouncil, BALPA,GAMTA, RoyalAeronautical Soc).

SUPERVISORY DIRECTORS BOARD (12members)Chairman + 11 members

Chairman is appointed by the Supervisory Board.Out of the 11 members, 8 are non-executive directors

(5 appointed by the Airline Group + 3 partnershipdirectors appointed by the DTLR) and 3 are executive

directors (CEO+COO+Finance Director).

NATS Ltd


ANNEX 9: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CIVIL-MILITARYCO-ORDINATION STATUS REPORT

Here are the recommendations from the Civil-Military co-ordination Status Report (Ref 20).Recommendation 1

D e f i n e co m m o n p r i n c i p l e s f o r e f f e c t i v e a i r sp a c e d e si g n a n dm a n a g e m e n t to b e a d o p t e d b y a l l E U R O C O NT R O L * M e m b e rS t a te s.

* w ith a possible extension to ECAC Member States

Recommendation 2I d e n t i f y m e c h a n is m s t o e ns u r e i n t e r n a t i o n a l c o - o r d i n at i o n ofa i r s p a c e d es i g n a n d m a n a g em e n t .

Recommendation 3I d e n t i f y w h i c h p r i n c i p l es , r u l e s a n d p r oc e d u r e s f o r t h e c o n d uc t o fm i l i t a ry ( O A T ) o p e r a t i o ns a n d f o r O A T / G A T c om p a t i b i l i t y n e e d t o b ec o m m o n ly a p p l i e d w i t h i n EU R OC O N T R O L* M e m b e r S t at e s .


Recommendation 4I nv e s t i g a t e m et h o d s t o i m p r ov e t h e us a g e of C o n d i t i o n a l R o ut e s .

Recommendation 5I nv e s t i g a t e a m o r e ef f ec t iv e m e t h o d f o r t h e n o t i f i c at i o n a n dd i s s e m i n at i o n of a i rs p a c e s t a t us d u r i n g p r e - t ac t ic a l ( A S M L ev e l 2 )a n d r e a l - t i m e ( A S M L ev e l 3 ) p h as e s .

Recommendation 6I nv e s t i g a t e a c o m m o n c o n t e nt , f o rm a t a n d m e t h o ds f o r a ut o m at i ce x c h a n g e of G A T a n d O A T f l i g ht d at a , b o t h n a t i o n a l ly a n di n t e r n a t i o n a l ly , t o b e a d o p t e d by a l l EU R OC O N T R O L * M e m b e rS t a t e s .


Recommendation 7I d e n t i f y t h e m o s t e f f ic i e n t c iv i l / m i l i t a ry e n - r o ut e A T S o p e r at i o n a la r r a n g e m e n t s i n t h e h i g h d e n s i t y a i r s p ac e of EU R OC O N T R O LM e m b e r S t a t es .

Recommendation 8I nv e s t i g a t e t h e n e e d t o a d d r es s f o rm a l ly s af e t y is s u es w i t h i n A T Mc iv i l -m i l i t a ry c o - o r d i n a t i o n at E u r o p e a n l ev e l .

Recommendation 9D ev e l o p b ot h n at i o n a l a n d i n t e r n at i o n a l r ev i e w p r o c es s es t o e ns u r et h e m os t e f f e c t iv e u s e a n d ev o l u t i o n of t h e F U A c o n c e pt .


ANNEX 10: GLOSSARY

ACC Area Control CentreAEA Association of European AirlinesAgency The EUROCONTROL AgencyAIS Aeronautical Information ServicesANS Air Navigation ServiceANSP Air Navigation Services ProviderANT EUROCONTROL Air Navigation TeamAPDSG ATM Procedures Development SubGroup (EATCHIP)APP Airport Approach UnitArea North Munich, Karlsruhe, Maastricht, Reims ACCsArea South Marseille, Milan, Geneva, Zurich ACCsARDEP Analysis of Research & Development in EUROCONTROL ProgrammesARN ATS Route Network and associated NavaidsArrival delay Difference between actual and scheduled arrival timeARTCC Air route traffic control centreASM Airspace ManagementAST Annual Summary TemplateATC Air Traffic ControlATCO Air Traffic Control OfficerATFM Air Traffic Flow ManagementATIR Air Transport Incident ReportsATM Air Traffic ManagementATS Air Traffic ServicesATN Aeronautical Telecommunication NetworkATZ Aerodrome Traffic Zone

CDM Collaborative Decision MakingCEATS Central European Air Traffic SystemCFIT Controlled Flight Into TerrainCFMU EUROCONTROL Central Flow Management UnitCFMU area Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech

Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, FYROM, Germany, Greece, Hungary,Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Netherlands,Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden,Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom

CHIEF CH (Switzerland), I (Italy), E (Spain), F (France)CIP EUROCONTROL Convergence and Implementation ProgrammeCNS Communications, Navigation and SurveillanceCO2 Carbon DioxideCODA EUROCONTROL Central Office for Delay AnalysisCollapsed sectors When two or more elementary ATC sectors are combined.Commission The governing body of EUROCONTROL, formerly the Permanent Commission.CRCO EUROCONTROL Central Route Charges Office

Departure delay Difference between actual and scheduled departure timeDFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH

EAM 04 EUROCONTROL Airspace Model (Run 04): total German airspace re-design.EASA European Aviation Safety AgencyEATMP European Air Traffic Management ProgrammeEC European CommissionECAC European Civil Aviation Conference.EEC EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, BrétignyEffective capacity “Effective Capacity” is defined as the traffic volume (km) which the ATM system can

handle with a given level of ATFM en-route delay.ESARR EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory RequirementETFMS Enhanced Tactical Flow Management SystemEU European UnionEURO88 area Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal,


Spain, Switzerland, United KingdomEURO99 area Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, , Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, France,

Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,Portugal, Romania, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey,United Kingdom

EUROCONTROL The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation. There are currently 30Member States: Germany, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Croatia, Denmark,Spain, Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the former Yugoslav Republicof Macedonia, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Norway, Netherlands, Portugal,Romania, Slovak Republic, Czech Republic, United Kingdom, Slovenia, Sweden,Switzerland, Turkey (situation at 1 January 2001).

FAA Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of AmericaFAP Future ATM ProfileFIR Flight Information RegionFL Flight LevelFMP Flow Management PositionFSF Flight Safety FoundationFUA Flexible Use of Airspace (concept)FYROM The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

Gross margin The difference between Total revenue and Total Operating Expenses

HC Unburned HydrocarbonsHEIDI Harmonisation of European Incident Definitions Initiative for ATM (SQS)HLG European Commission’s High Level Group on a Single Sky for Europe

IATA International Air Transport AssociationICAO International Civil Aviation OrganizationIFPS Initial Flight Plan SystemIFR Instrument Flight RulesIMC Instrumental Meteorological Conditions

Interested parties Government regulatory bodies, Air Navigation Service Providers, airport authorities,airspace users, international civil aviation organisations, EUROCONTROL Agency,representatives of airspace users, airports and staff organisations and other agenciesor international organisations which may contribute to the work of the PRC.

ITA Institut du Transport AérienIUSOAP ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme

JAA Joint Aviation AuthoritiesJSAT Runway Incursion Joint Safety Analysis TeamJSSI JAA’s Joint Safety Strategy Initiative

KPA Key Performance AreaKPI Key Performance Indicator

LCIP Local Convergence and Implementation Plans, published by EUROCONTROLLower airspace For the purposes of PRR 4 it is below Flight Level 245.

M MillionMATSE ECAC Transport Ministers’ meeting on the Air Traffic System in EuropeMET Meteorology

NATS National Air Traffic Services (UK)

OAT Operational Air Traffic (military)Over-delivery This occurs when the actual number of aircraft that entered the sector during a

particular period exceeds the regulated capacity. An over-delivery does not necessarilyresult in an overload.


Overload An overload occurs when an ATCO reports that he has had to handle more traffic thanhe considers it was safe to do so.

Organisation The EUROCONTROL Organisation, i.e. Member States and the Agency

PRC Performance Review CommissionPRR Performance Review ReportPRU Performance Review UnitPrimary Delay A delay other than reactionary

R&D Research and DevelopmentReactionary delay Delay caused by late arrival of aircraft or crew from previous journeys.Runway incursion European definition: Any unauthorised presence on a runway of aircraft, vehicle,

person or object where an avoiding action was required to prevent a collision with anaircraft. Source: ESARR 2.US definition: Any occurrence at an airport involving an aircraft, vehicle, person, orobject on the ground, that creates a collision hazard or results in a loss of separationwith an aircraft taking-off, intending to take off, landing or intending to land. Source:US (FAA order 8020.11A).

RVSM Reduced Vertical Separation Minima

Safety Net tools Assistance tools that provide a safety back-up in the event of system failure or humanerror

SARPS ICAO Standards and Recommended PracticesSkyguide ANSP of SwitzerlandSNET Safety NetsSRC Safety Regulation CommissionSRU Safety Regulation UnitSTATFOR Specialist Panel on Air Traffic Statistics and ForecastsSummer period May to October inclusive

Terminal ANS Terminal Air Navigation ServicesTMA Terminal Management AreaTSA Temporary Segregated AreaTWR Traffic controlled tower

UAC Upper Airspace Area Control CentreUK United KingdomUS The United States of America

VFR Visual Flight RulesVOR/DME VHF Omni Range, Distance Measuring Equipment


ANNEX 11: REFERENCES

N o t e : A n u m b e r o f t h e f o l l o w i n g r e f e r e n c e s a r e a v a i l a b l e f r o m t h eP R C W e b s i t e ( h t t p : / / w w w . E U R O C O N T R O L . i n t / p r c ) .

1. Institutional Strategy for European Air Traffic Management, European Civil AviationConference (ECAC), MATSE 5, Copenhagen 1997, http://www.ecac-ceac.org

2. Follow-up to PRC recommendations, PRR 5 on-line references,http://www.eurocontrol.int/prc

3. EUROCONTROL, the Performance Review Commission's European ATM PerformanceMeasurement System, June 1999, http://www.eurocontrol.int/prc/reports_kpa.html

4. Ministère de l’Equipement, des Transports et du Logement, Inspection Générale de ‘AviationCivile et de la Météorologie, Bureau Enquêtes Accidents, France, Accident survenu le 25 mai2000 à Paris Charles-de-Gaulle

5. EUROCONTROL, Safety Review Commission (SRC), Safety Regulatory Requirement: Reportingand Assessment of Safety Occurrences in ATM (ESARR 2),http://www.eurocontrol.int/src/html/deliverables.html#esarr2

6. EUROCONTROL, Safety Review Commission (SRC), SRC DOC 2, Aircraft Accidents/Incidentsand ATM Contribution: Review and Analysis of Historical Data Ver.2.0, Nov 2001,http://www.eurocontrol.int/src/documents/deliverables/srcdoc2e2ri.pdf

7. EUROCONTROL, ATM 2000+ Strategy,http://www.eurocontrol.int/eatmp/library/strategydoc.html

8. EUROCONTROL, Safety Review Commission (SRC), SRC Policy DOC 19. EUROCONTROL, Publication and Confidentiality Policy,

http://www.eurocontrol.int/src/documents/deliverables/esarr2_awareness_package/eam2gui2e10ri.pdf

10. EUROCONTROL Performance Review Commission, Fourth Performance Review Report (PRR 4),Year 2000, Brussels, April 2001, http://www.eurocontrol.int/prc/reports_prr4.html

11. European Commission, Single Sky, Report of the High Level Group, Luxembourg, November2000

12. EUROCONTROL “SKYWAY” magazine, Volume 6, No.23, Winter 2001/2002, pg. 1513. “Flight International” magazine, December 2001 and January 2002 issues14. “Air Transport World” magazine, March 2002 issue15. Workshop on Airline and National Strategies for Dealing with Airport and Airspace Congestion,

15 March 2001, Briefing by MIT Prof. C. Barnhart,http://www.isr.umd.edu/airworkshop/Barnhart-Bratu.pdf

16. EUROCONTROL, CODA, Annual report 2001,http://www.eurocontrol.int/dgs/activities/coda/reports/2001/annual_report_2001_full.pdf

17. ATFM summary, Year 2001, EUROCONTROL/CFMU, issued January 2002,http://www.cfmu.eurocontrol.int/ATFM/public/docs/publicreport_2001year

18. Institut du Transport Aérien (ITA), Cost Of Air Transport Delay in Europe, Final Report,November 2000, http://www.eurocontrol.int/prc/reports/stu2/documents/stu2.pdf

19. EUROCONTROL, EEC report 361, 5-States fast time simulation,http://www.eurocontrol.fr/public/reports/eecreports/2001/361.htm

20. EUROCONTROL, Status of Civil-military co-ordination in Air Traffic Management, October 2001,Doc No 01-00-06, http://www.eurocontrol.int/eatmp/mil/report_civmil_coop.pdf

21. EUROCONTROL, “ARDEP” report (A summary of European ATM R&D programmes),http://www.eurocontrol.int/ardep-arda/ArdepBudget99.html

22. CIP Lessons Learnt Seminar, 1999, http://www.eurocontrol.int/odt/ll_99/23. Jane’s Airport Review, Feb 2002, vol. 14, issue 1, p 2424. Communications from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, European

Commission, COM (2001) 123 final and 564 final, Brussels, 10.10.2001,http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/availability/en_availability_2001_3.html

25. International Civil Aviation Organisation, Annex 11, Air Traffic Services, 12th Edition, 199826. EUROCONTROL Common Format, Cross-Border, Inter-Centre Letter of Agreement, Annex A:

Model Agreement on the Delegation of Air Traffic Services, 1 June 2001, Version 227. NATO Handbook, Edition 2000 and Tactical Leadership Programme, Briefing to Eurocontrol,

28/06/2001, Wg Cdr Jon Hill28. FLUG REVUE 12/2001, pg. 42, http://www.flug-

revue.rotor.com/FRheft/FRH0112/FR0112g.htm29. EUROCONTROL, Specification for information disclosure, April 2001,

http://www.eurocontrol.int/prc/reports_eco1.html

Documents

annexes - Eurocontrol · Source: ICAO ADREP accident/incident database Fixed-wing aircraft, no military aircraft Figure 2: Serious incidents (ATS-related or not) reported within ECAC