Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
42C12NWe87l 2.6590 MOLSON LAKE010
42C12NW0071 2.6590 MOLSON LAKE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part A; Notes on theory and field procedure
Part B; Report
1. Introduction
2. Presentation of Results
3. Discussion of Results
4. Recommendations
5. Assessment Details
6. Statement of Cost
7. Certificate - P.G. Hallof
8. Appendix - Shallow Sources
8 pages
7 pages Page
l
1
2
3
5
6
7
010C
Part C; Illustrations
Plan Map (in pocket)
IP Data Plots
6 pieces
Dwg.No.I.P.P. 4115R
Dwg.Nos.IP 5370-1 to -5
o e
42C12NWee?t 2 .6598 MOLSON LAKE010
42C12NW0071 2 .6590 MOLSON LAKE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part A; Notes on theory and field procedure
Part B; Report
1. Introduction
2. Presentation of Results
3. Discussion of Results
4. Recommendations
5. Assessment Details
6. Statement of Cost
7. Certificate - P.G. Hallof
8. Appendix - Shallow Sources
8 pages
7 pages Page
l
1
2
3
5
6
7
010C
Part C; Illustrations
Plan Map (in pocket)
IP Data Plots
6 pieces
Dwg.No.I.P.P. 4115R
Dwg.Nos.IP 5370-1 to -5
O 6 1984
MHOS Sffinos
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED
NOTES ON THE THEORY, METHOD OF FIELD OPERATION,
AND PRESENTATION OF DATA
FOR THE INDUCED POLARIZATION METHOD
Induced Polarization as a geophysical measurement refers
to the blocking action or polarization of metallic or electronic
conductors in a medium of ionic solution conduction.
This electro-chemical phenomenon occurs wherever
electrical current is passed through an area which contains metallic
minerals such as base metal sulphides. Normally, when current is
passed through the ground, as in resistivity measurements, all of the
conduction takes place through ions present in the water content of the
rock, or soil, i.e. by ionic conduction. This is because almost all
minerals have a much higher specific resistivity than ground water,
The group of minerals commonly described as "metallic", however,
have specific resistivities much lower than ground waters. The
induced polarization effect takes place at those interfaces where the
mode of conduction changes from ionic in the solutions filling the
interstices of the rock to-electronic; in the,metallic minerals present
- 2 -
in the rock.
The blocking action or induced polarization mentioned
above, which depends upon the chemical energies necessary to allow
the ions to give up or receive electrons from the metallic surface,
increases with the time that a d.c. current is allowed to flow through
the rock; i.e. as ions pile up against the metallic interface the
resistance to current flow increases. Eventually, there is enough
polarization in the form of excess ions at the interfaces, to appreciably
reduce the amount of current flow through the metallic particle. This
polarization takes place at each of the infinite number of solution-metal
interfaces in a mineralized rock.
When the d.c. voltage used to create this d.c. current
flow is cut off, the Coulomb forces between the charged ions forming
the polarization cause them to return to their normal position. This
movement of charge creates a small current flow which can be
measured on the surface of the ground as a decaying potential difference.
From an alternate viewpoint it can be seen that if the
direction of the current through the system is reversed repeatedly
before the polarization occurs, the effective resistivity of the system
as a whole will change as the frequency of the switching is changed.
This is a consequence of the fact that the amount of current flowing
through each metallic interface depends upon the length of time that
current has been passing through it in one direction.
- 3 -
The values of the per cent frequency effect or F.E. are
a measurement of the polarization in the rock mass. However, since
the measurement of the degree of polarization is related to the apparent
resistivity of the rock mass it is found that the metal factor values or
M.F. are the most useful values in determining the amount of
polarization present in the rock mass. The MF values are obtained by
normalizing the F.E. values for varying resistivities.
The induced polarization measurement is perhaps the most
powerful geophysical method for the direct detection of metallic
sulphide mineralization, even when this mineralization is of very
low concentration. The lower limit of volume per cent sulphide
necessary to produce a recognizable IP anomaly will vary with the
geometry and geologic environment of the source, and the method of
executing the survey. However, sulphide mineralization of less than
one per cent by volume has been detected by the IP method under
proper geological conditions.
The greatest application of the IP method has been in the
search for disseminated metallic sulphides of less than 2 07, by volume.
However, it has also been used successfully in the search for massive
sulphides in situations where, due to source geometry, depth of source,f
or low resistivity of surface layer, the EM method cannot be successfully
applied. The ability to differentiate ionic conductors, such as water
filled shear zones, makes the IP method a useful tool in checking EM
anomalies which are suspected of being due to these causes.
In normal field applications the IP method does not
differentiate between the economically important metallic minerals
such as chalcopyrite, chalcocite, molybdenite, galena, etc., and the
other metallic minerals such as pyrite. The induced polarization effect
is due to the total of all electronic conducting minerals in the rock mass.
Other electronic conducting materials which can produce an IP response
are magnetite, pyrolusite, graphite, and some forms of hematite.
In the field procedure, measurements on the surface are
made in a way that allows the effects of lateral changes in the properties
of the ground to be separated from the effects of vertical changes in the
properties. Current is applied to the ground at two points in distance
(X) apart. The potentials are measured at two points (X) feet
apart, in line with the current electrodes is an integer number (n) times
the basic distance (X).
The measurements are made along a surveyed line, with
a constant distance (nX) between the nearest current and potential
electrodes. In most surveys, several traverses are made with various
values of (n); i.e. (n) - 1 ,2,3,4, etc. The kind of survey required
(detailed or reconnaissance) decides the number of values of (n) used.
In plotting the results, the values of apparent resistivity,
apparent per cent frequency effect, and the apparent metal factor
- 5 -
measured for each set of electrode positions are plotted at the
intersection of grid lines, one from the center point of the current
electrodes and the other from the center point of the potential electrodes.
(See Figure A). The resistivity values are plotted at the top of the data
profile, above the percent frequency effect. On a third line, below the
percent frequency effect, are plotted the values of the metal factor values.
The lateral displacement of a given value is determined by the location
along the survey line of the center point between the current and potential
electrodes. The distance of the value from the line is determined by the
distance (nX) between the current and potential electrodes when the
measurement was made.
The separation between sender and receiver electrodes is
only one factor which determines the depth to which the ground is being
sampled in any particular measurement. The plots then, when contoured,
are not section maps of the electrical properties of the ground under
the survey line. The interpretation of the results from any given survey
must be carried out using the combined experience gained from field
results, model study results and the theoretical investigations. The
position of the electrodes when anomalous values are measured is
important in the interpretation.
In the field procedure, the interval over which the potential
differences are measured is the same as the interval over which the
electrodes are moved after a series of potential readings has been made.
-6 -
One of the advantages of the induced polarization method is that the
same equipment can be used for both detailed and reconnaissance surveys
merely by changing the distance (X) over which the electrodes are moved
each time. In the past, intervals have been used ranging from 25 feet
to 2000 feet for (X). In each case, the decision as to the distance (X)
and the values of (n) to be used is largely determined by the expected
size of the mineral deposit being sought, the size of the expected anomaly
and the speed with which it is desired to progress.
The diagram in Figure A demonstrates the method used
in plotting the results. Each value of the apparent resistivity, apparent
percent frequency effect, and apparent metal factor effect is plotted and
identified by the position of the four electrodes when the measurement
was made. It can be seen that the values measured for the larger values
of (n) are plotted farther from the line indicating that the thickness of
the layer of the earth that is being tested is greater than for the smaller
values of (n); i.e. the depth of the measurement is increased.
The IP measurement is basically obtained by measuring the
difference in potential or voltage (AV)obtained at two operating
frequencies. The voltage is the product of the current through the ground
and the apparent resistivity of the ground. Therefore in field situations
where the current is very low due to poor electrode contact, or the
apparent resistivity is very low, or a combination of the two effects; the
value of (AV ) the change in potential will be too small to be measurable.
The symbol "TL" on the data plots indicates this situation.
- 7 ~
In some situations spurious noise, either man made or natural,
will render it impossible to obtain a reading. The symbol "N" on the
data plots indicates a station at which it is too noisy to record a reading.
If a reading can be obtained, but for reasons of noise there is some doubt
as to its accuracy, the reading is bracketed in the data plot ( ).
In certain situations negative values of Apparent Frequency
Effect are recorded. This may be due to the geologic environment or
spurious electrical effects. The actual negative frequency effect value
recorded is indicated on the data plot, however, the symbol "NEC" is
indicated for the corresponding value of Apparent Metal Factor. In
contouring negative values the contour lines are indicated to the nearest
positive value in the immediate vicinity of the negative value.
The symbol "NR" indicates that for some reason the operator
did not attempt to record a reading although normal survey procedures
would suggest that one was required. This may be due to inaccessible
topography or other similar reasons. Any symbol other than those
discussed above is unique to a particular situation and is described within
the body of the report.
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED.
f METHOD USED IN PLOTTING DIPOLE-DIPOLE
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS
nx
Stations on line
rt - l
n - 2
rt - 3
n - 4
x * Electrode spreod length n * Electrode seporotlon
P p p p p p1,2-5.4 2,3-4,5 3.4-5,6 4,5-6? 5,6-7,8 6,7-8,9
P P P P P'l,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9
P P P P1,2-5,6 2,3-6,7 3.4-7,8 4,5-8,9
P P P 1,2-6,7 2,3-7,8 3,4-8,9
Apparent Resistivity
n - J
n - 2
n - 3
n - 4
F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E1,2-3,4 2,3- 4 fi 3,4-5,6 4,5-6,7 5.6-7J8 6,7-8,9
F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E.. .. .. .. .1,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9
i,2 : 5,6 2^-6,7 3,4-7,'e 4^-e',9 Apparent Percent P E p E F.E Frequency Effect
1,2-617 2,3-7,8 3,4-8,9
n - l
n - 2
n - 3
n - 4
M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F, M.F. M.F. 1,2-3,4 2,3-4,5 3,4-5,6 4,5-6,7 5,6-7,8 6,7-8,9
___ M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. 1,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9
______ M.F. M.F. - M.F. M.F. 1,2-5,6 2,3-6,7 3,4-7,8 4^-8,9
_________ M.F. M.F. M.F. 1,2-6,7 2,3-7,8 3,4-8,9
Apparent Metal Factor
Fig. A
SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT
ON THE
DETAILED INDUCED POLARIZATION
AND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
ON THE
B. BOOS CLAIM GROUP.
HEMLO AREA, ONTARIO
FOR
SEEMAR MINES LIMITED
1. INTRODUCTION
A previous report, dated November 14, 1983, describes the
reconnaissance results from the B. Boos Claim Group. These measurements
were made using 200 foot electrode intervals.
Induced Polarization anomalies were indicated by these
reconnaissance data, but some distortions were suspected due to the
presence of a grounded power line. Detailed measurements have now been
completed on the southwest portion of the grid, using X e 100'.
2. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
The reconnaissance induced polarization and resistivity results are
shown on the following enclosed data plots. The results have been
plotted using the "pseudo-section" format.
- 2 -
Line Electrode Intervals Dwg. No.
O 100' IP 5370-1
2E 100' IP 5370-2
4E 100' IP 5370-3
6E 100' IP 5370-4
8E 100' IP 5370-5
The plan map from the previous report, Dwg.No, I.P.P. 4115, has
been updated to show the results of the detailed survey.
3. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
The detailed measurements with one hundred foot electrode intervals
have confirmed that a strong IP anomaly lies to the south of the power
line.
The apparent resistivity results, and the IP anomalies have been
transferred to the plan map, Dwg.No. I.P.P.4115R. There are still some
possible distortions due to the power line. However, the patterns
suggest that the broad anomalous zone measured on Line O may be due to
the fact that the survey line passes approximately parallel to the nose
of a fold.
To the south, and southeast, the IP anomaly correlates with a zone
of lower apparent resistivities. To the north, and northeast, the zone
of lower apparent resistivities passes beneath the conductive overburden
layer. Under these conditions, the exact interpretation of the zone of
lower apparent resistivities is not possible.
To the southeast, the IP results indicate a narrow, shallow source.
To the northeast, there is the possibility that a portion of the complex
anomalous pattern is due to the grounded power line.
- 3 -
The available geologic information indicates that to the southeast
the narrow anomalous zone lies near a contact vith felsic rocks to the
south and sediments and volcanics to the north. Some pyrite, pyrrhotite
and rusty outcrops have been mapped in this area.
As outlined in the Appendix to this report, the sources of these
narrow, shallow anomalies can be better located and more fully evaluated
by making detailed measurements using shorter electrode intervals.
4. RECOMMENDATIONS
The detailed measurements on the B. Boos Claim Group have been made
in the southwest corner of the grid. Some distortions from the grounded
power line may be present. However, a definite anomalous zone has been
confirmed to the southeast. As shown on the plan map. Dwg.No.
I.P.P.4115R, it is possible that Line O crosses the nose of a fold; this
geometry would explain the broad IP anomaly measured on Line 0.
To the southeast, the narrow, shallow IP anomaly, associated with a
zone of low resistivities, appears to correlate closely with a geologic
contact. The position of this anomalous zone should be correlated
carefully with the available geological and geochemical information. If
the source of the strong IP effects is not known, a drill test would be
warranted.
At the least two, or perhaps more, short angled drill holes would
be necessary to test the anomalous zone. As outlined in the Appendix to
this report, the source of the narrow, shallow anomalies can be better
located, and more fully evaluated by making detailed measurements using
shorter electrode intervals. Measurements should be made
using X s 50 feet and perhaps even X ^ 30 feet.
- A -
The anomalies recommended for further investigation are:
i) Line O, 4+50S
ii) Line 2E, 14+OOS
iii) Line 4E, 3+50S
iv) Line 6E, 17+50S
When the detail recommended above is available, drill holes can be
located to intersect the sources.
PH01
Philip G. g#lof, Ph.D., Geophysicist
Dated: March 15, 1984
- 5 -
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
PROPERTY: B.Boos Claims
SPONSOR: Seemar Mines Ltd.
LOCATION: Hemlo Area
TYPE OF SURVEY: Induced Polarizationand Resistivity
OPERATING MAN DAYS:
EQUIVALENT 8 HR. MAN DAYS:
CONSULTING MAN DAYS:
DRAFTING MAN DAYS:
TOTAL MAN DAYS:
15.0
22.5
2.25
3.25
28.0
PROVINCE: Ontario
DATE STARTED: February 9, 1984
DATE FINISHED: February 17, 1984
NUMBER OF STATIONS: 125
NUMBER OF READINGS: 1,455
MILES OF LINE SURVEYED: 2.27
CONSULTANTS:
P.G. Hallof, 3505 - 2045 Lakeshore Blvd. W., Toronto, Ontario
FIELD TECHNICIANS:
R. Fernholm, c/o General Delivery, Haileybury, Ontario D. Daggett, 35 Falcon Crescent, Chelmsford, Ontario
Extra Labourers;
D. Tardif, P.O. Box 239, St. Leonard, N.B.C. Constantineau, P.O. Box 201, White River, Ontario
CARTOGRAPHERS:
R.C. Norris, 2499 Linwood Street, Pickering, Ontario M.W. Reh, 58 Crossbow Crescent, Willowdale, Ontario
SICS LIMI
Philip G. Hallof, Ph.D
Dated: March 15, 1984
- 6 -
STATEMENT OF COST
Manwa Exploration Services Ltd. - IP Survey B.Boos Grid - Hemlo Area, Ontario
CREW; D. Daggett - R. Fernholm
Extra Labourers: D. Tardif - C. Constantineau
PERIOD; February 9-17, 1984
7*5 Operating days 1*5 Bad Weather
Local Transportation: 9 days
@ $675.00/day @ $340.00/day
@ $ 55.00/day
$5,062.50 510.00
495.00
Extra Labourers:
2 men @ $70.00/day/man x 9+2QZ
$1,260.00 252.00
1,512.00 $7,579.50
Dated: March 15, 1984
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LJM
Philip G.Tlallof, Ph.3k., ^'.Eng. Geophysicist \*^ -^^ ^^- ^
S* OF o^
- 7 -
CERTIFICATE
I, Philip G. Hallof, of the City of Toronto, do hereby certify
that:
1. I am a geophysicist residing at Suite 3505, 2045 Lakeshore
Blvd., W. Toronto, Ontario.
2. I am a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a
B.Se. Degree (1952) in Geology and Geophysics, and a Ph.D. Degree (1957) in
Geophysics.
3. I am a member of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists and the
European Association of the Exploration Geophysicists.
4. I am a Professional Geophysicist, registered in the Province of
Ontario, The Province of British Columbia and The State of Arizona.
5. I have no direct or indirect interest, nor do I expect to receive any
interest directly or indirectly, in the properties or securities of Seemar Mines
Limited, or any affiliate.
6. The statements made in this report are based on a study of published
geological literature and unpublished private reports.
7. Permission is granted to use in whole or in part for assessment and
qualification requirements but not for advertising purposes.
Dated at Toronto
This 15th day of March, 1984
Philip G. Hallof, Ph.D
PHOENIX Geophysics Limited
APPENDIX
THE INTERPRETATION OF
INDUCED POLARIZATION ANOMALIES
FROM RELATIVELY SMALL SOURCES
The induced polarization method was originally developed to detect disseminated sulphides and has proven to be very successful in the search for "porphyry copper" deposits. In recent years we have found that the IP method can also be very useful in exploring for more concentrated deposits of limited size. This type of source gives sharp IP anomalies that are often difficult to interpret.
The anomalous patterns that develop on the contoured data plots will depend on the size, depth and position of the source and the relative size of the electrode interval. The data plots are not sections showing the electrical parameters of the ground. When the electrode interval (X) is appreciably greater than the width of the source, a large volume of unmineralized rock is averaged into each measurement. This is particularly true for the large values of the electrode separation (n).
The theoretical scale model results shown in Figure l and Figure 2 indicate the effect of depth. If the depth to the top of the source is small compared to the electrode interval (i.e. d X) the measure ment for n = l will be anomalous. In Figure l the depth is 0.5 units (X = 1.0 units) and the n ** l value is definitely anomalous; the pattern on the contoured data plot is typical for a relatively shallow, narrow, near- vertical tabular source. The results in Figure 2 are for the same source with the depth increased to 1.5 units. Here the n - l value is not anomalous; the larger values of (n) are anomalous but the magnitudes are much lower than for the source at less depth.
When the electrode interval is greater than the width of the source, it is not possible to determine its width or exact position between the electrodes. The true IP effect within the source is also indeterminate; the anomaly from a very narrow source with a very large true IP effect will be much the same as that from a zone with twice the width and \ the true IP effect. The theoretical scale model data shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4 demonstrate this problem. The depth and position of the source are unchanged but the width and true IP effect are varied. The anomalous patterns and magnitudes are essentially the same, hence the data are in sufficient to evaluate the source completely.
The normal practise is to indicate the IP anomalies by solid, broken, or dashed bars, depending upon their degree of distinctiveness. These bars represent the surface projection of the anomalous zones as inter preted from the location of the transmitter and receiver electrodes when the anomalous values were measured. As illustrated in Figure l, Figure 2 Figure 3 and Figure A, no anomaly can be located with more accuracy than the spread length. While the centre of the solid bar indicating the anomaly corresponds fairly well with the source, the length of the bar should not be taken to represent the exact edges of the anomalous material.
- 2 -
If the source is shallow, the anomaly can be better evaluatedusing a shorter electrode interval. When the electrode interval used approaches the width of the source, the apparent effects measured will be nearly equal to the true effects within the source. When there is some depth to the top of the source, it is not possible to use electrode intervals that are much less than the depth to the source. In this situation, one must realize that a definite ambiguity exists regarding the width of the source and the IP effect within the source.
Our experience has confirmed the desirability of doing detail. When a reconnaissance IP survey using a relatively large electrode interval indicates the presence of a narrow, shallow source, detail with shorter electrode intervals is necessary in order to better locate, and evaluate, the source. The data of most usefulness is obtained when the maximum apparent IP effect is measured for n ^ 2 or n ^ 3. For instance, an anomaly orginally located using X = 300' may be checked with X = 200' and then X * 100'. The data with X = 1 00" will be quite different from the original reconnais sance results with X = 300*.
The data shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 are field results from a greenstone area in Quebec. The expected sources were narrow (less than 30' in width) zones of massive, high-grade, zinc-silver ore. An electrode interval of 200' was used for the reconnaissance survey in order to keep the rate of progress at an acceptable level. The anomalies located were low in magnitude.
The very weak, shallow anomaly shown in Figure 5 is typical of those located by the X = 200' reconnaissance survey. Several anomalies of this type were detailed using shorter electrode intervals. In most cases the detail measurements suggested broad zones of very weak minerali zation. However, in the case of the source at 20N to 22N, the measurements with shorter electrode intervals confirmed the presence of a strong, narrow source. The X = 50' results are shown in Figure 6. Subsequent drilling has shown the source to be 12.5' of massive sulphide mineralization con taining significant zinc and silver values.
The change in the anomaly that results when the electrodeinterval is reduced is not unusual. The X ^ 5 0' data more accurately locates the narrow source, and permits the geophysicist to make a better evaluation of its importance. The completion of this type of detail is very important, in order to get the maximum usefulness from a reconnaissance IP survey.
Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies Scale Model Cases
io li li li n is n 17 li li
H li n / I.I l i.i vli u u
H , I I H/ ' M *'' *^v" " ' "li li li /i-1 1-1 i-*' i.t l.iNji . li l*
ii ii n /1,1 i.i i.i i.i i.i i.t N. u li liit ii li X. i i.i i.t i.i i.i i.i i.iN n H li
l l 11 t t 1 1 18 II 11 H 11 IS III 17 II
1.1 l l
(fe)o
i i i i i i i i i i u n u n n is u it 11 H
j
(Mf)o
f ii n ii i? H it ii n it ii
)|-IO ( P/Zir) 2 - 2-51
(Mf) ,* O (Mf) 2*10000
IllCtlff** CM^MMITIM { f C ) O ' 25X*- l ***-*l-0- t -* ** l L-" ———
I
VBlfi* M*l
PtM f III K
MlVtf tttt
•i" i ' l '-:
MlttfM,*!! IWt
•1 t M
CASE J-OJ5-BU-IO-0
Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies Scale Model Cases
i j i__t i ) i i ip H i; 11 M u it i; it ii
li ii li n f ,i.i yji ii il iiii H nx*Tii.i i.i vTXji ii ii
li il \\yt.\ I .I i.i i.i MN. u li uH u H/I.F i.i i.i i.i i.i i.t\i il il 'i
il ii H /i.i i.i i.i 1.1 i.i t.i i.i\ n H
t i i a; st til ii n u D n u H n u ii
i ii ii ii itt II l i.y l.f l l l l
l l .1.1 I.I^^J^^T^^J^S^l.l -l. l l li i .1,1 i.iX/rii A.i i.ij rlys.i.f i t i
l l .I.t I.I /l.l\ l,|\ M /i.i /i.|\ i.i .1.1 i i(f.lo
i i i j i s i \ t j it n u ti h H u n ii n
(Mf)o
' i ? j j t j j l inn it u H 'u H n A n
(Mf)- O
2-2-6
(Mf) 2* 9250
(ft) 2* 24X
CASE
THEORETICAL ' INDUCED POLARIZATION n (____ |0
AND n-2————K) 10
RESISTIVITY STUDIES l '.l~^" ,0 W n '0
SCALE MODEL CASE
PLAN VIEW
6 7 69 10 II l? ft 14 Ifr Ifr
97 6 8 9 7 \ IO 10 1095 ST 87 95\IO 10 IO
6 8 B 9 68 93\IO 10 K)68 90 90 68 92 \ 10 JO 10
! t' to IZ 14
*- ( -**- nx -*-- x
^7X EQUALS l UNIT
7 69 K) II 12 13 14 15 16
-O2 o -OS/ 07^36
Q O -o 0740n-3 ——— O O -On-4— O -03
8 9 10 H 12 g 14 l?
n .l —————— n Q ,49 72^410
n -2————— o O -59 74^460 46n-3——— O O -59 75^^34) 489n-4—O -30 -59 Xl4Tx^382 467 467
B 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16
-10
(Mf), - O (Mf )g* 11700
(Fe) 2 * sov,^DEPTH EXTENT OF SOURCE
l 4UNITS
FIG3
THEORETICAL 6——s——T P——?——e—u—12—12—*—is—*
NDUCED POLARIZATION B.,____ I0 |0 9 M M )0 ^ '}oAND n-2 ————— 10 10 10/97 91 91 97\IO 10 10
n .3———10 10 10/97 9 2 92 92 9-7\ 10 10 10RESISTIVITY STUDIES n-4-io 10 .o Ae 93 93 93 93 96\ .o ro ro
SCALE MODEL CASE
PLAN VIEW
S 676 ? Ip II 12 13 14 15 16
lFe)on -] ——————— o O -03 O/// 35 \s\0 -03 O O
n -2 ————— O .0 -08 0 ///3B 3 8l\SP -08 O O n-3———O O -08 Q^W45 45 4-6^^S.05 -08 O O n -4—O O -07 ' 08^^-2 /5^1 "s-TN 42\N\ O7 -07 O O
5 678 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 '__16
10 : iz (Mf)o-3O
n .4 — 0 O -70
678 9 Ip H 12 13 14 16
\ /' { p2lr} , |0 ( x, 2 7r) '24I~
^ V (Mf)| -0 (Mf ) 2 '22800
X EQUALS 1 UNIT (Fe)2 . 55V.
-T '
DEPTH EXTENT Of SOUACC 14 UNITS
FIG 4
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS
BATCHELOR LAKE AREA, QUEBEC. .
isoo/v *sooix woo '
4040 f SI70
•t— 1500 f / 4BOO. 3960 \ f 7600 J /YZOSO
12200 VJMOO\I6QO
60 \ /7600 J //Z030 J //900 X/
ON I2N I4N ' 1GN ION 20N 22N ' 24N 26N 28N
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY.RESULT
BATCHELOR LAKE AREA, QUEBEC,
l — 0-IJ O-tl O-M O 0-8* 0-1H ''1[X/
•J ———— 0'67 0-19 0-18 0-Z 0-88 0-78 ' Ol M, F.) i
•0-38 '0-1 0-ZZ 0-Z8 0'B8 0-11 Ot
ION 12N I4N I6N I8N 20N 22N 24N 26N 28 N
19 N 20N -- 21N 22N 23 N
H4-0-S8 0-12
0-38 tnr.tt,M
22N 23 N
.1——0-13 , J 1 -3 1-4
S ^——V
GLACIAL OVERBURDENION I2N I4.N I6N - I6N 20N 22N 24N 26N 28N
MASSIVE SULPHIDE ZONE
FIG. 5
MASSIVE SULPHIDE ZONE *—
GREENSTONE
FIG. 6
B. BOOS C L fi I MS L I ME -e XMQ0F RHO (OHM-M)
J '2 l 3 110 111 l "T2"DIPOLE NUMBERCOORDIHRTE 1650S 1450S 1250S 1950S 65 0SINTERPRETRT I OH
- N s 2
- N s 3
- H z 4
. M s 5
- H s 6
-^218i?. 4436 \ 6357 ^ \ 13K \,7965/^ 1822^r 13 \ 7.B x\ 16 /^.177// 77 ^x 284^x709/^1
5487 ' 4423 ; 7S7tf' v^liT^1626^10 14 'f. 5 W 26 ":vx 73^/260x^^46^ 424 ,•' \ - ^ xy 'JaS**?*' r^L-j-"- ' "-' 'j ',\ --S yv. ,^ /v -^
473?.X54W \ 9772^1675Jjf3?K^'leXltSt 12 12 \ 28^244 xT 86 V^331 X^l
54ft4 623? ;
6474 x
r ?.o
r X-'-— r.57 '^--?* 23 ^ 71 '37 -' 3
B BOOS CLfllMS '
DIPOLE NUMBERCOORDINATE 1650S
LIHE-0 X^100F PHRSE ':i.0H2?
12 13 | 4 .1 5145.0S 1250S
16171050S
18191850S
10 111 112 1650S 450
INTERPRETRT I OH . .•H* l 8.4 x 12
i
•N*3 12
•H* 4
\ 18 19 ^7.4^-x 37
14 ) 19 17 ff 35 \
i 16 16 /7 34 (33)S ——————— ( /s
K 12 Y'' 33 '(36)
12 A' 2? TN (34)
3? VvZ!
(34) 32.
(35) (40)
(36) TN
\101 v\ 60
(30) /; \\ 111 ^ 52
1 (66) 54*— — •^(35)^ (68) 56
(109)Xx (71) "'
60 72 58 \
6V^\r250 y 86 76 ^5-
/' 79 82 /' 63
^77 ^79 71
POWERLINE
B. BOOS CLfilMS LIHE-0 X*100F METflL FflCTOP
DIPOLE NUMBER 12 13 14 l 10 l l 11CQORDINRTE 1650S 145GS 1250S 1050S S50S 650S 456INTERPRETATION
•N*l
•N*2
•Ns3
•Ns4
• N s 5
• N s 6
.4 630
3 .2 .1 ^-'2.2^(276) 2587"M592) ^425^^71
.3 ^ x^x 2^y^:(892)|^( 171 )\^(435) ^vj 548)\\ 191 *"/) -i\\ rxscate. \\ j ' ^^*
.2 y y3.1 -^(452) (402),^((75r^- (217))) (621)
••^4.5 TN (171) (157) TN (547) x-(2?ft)
M E - Q RHO (OHM-M)
3 l 4 j T l l 0 111 112 113 114 |15 116 117 118 119 l 2 Q l 2*1 T e. *-1450S 1250S 850: 150M 3 5 DU
357, \ 13K
406 '\ 9772,4
434 ''-^650
16 '"%-JZIx/ r? /'' 2S4 X- 709 ''V38 \\221 \\634 rv, 1616 \2180 2144 2121
V'v' 26 ':\:x^3^/' 260 /C^&fa 424^118^214X^83 \\1605\2550 2799 2?2© f] \\ \\ Xv xjx X// ^/V \.—^.1—, vN v-"'——— \ '—————
12 \v 28^:^244^^86^^331/^187^414 \ 252^\X876'X 1255') \2519 (3652 3695X //j ' s-fel^, y^ X,' //' ,——^, •"^^——;x ; \ -. .
X li )^X.76 X"^*Q ^f ^83 A;i95xX 434 /' 645: \\J241 Xx 67? /\45^4 \ 2?i2/ 451S
'20 24^-^13^^311 '^"237 x 383 -1 '574 •X763V;:'^ ''''iH'^ ^ 96SN' l 1667'--3324
f^l
9 = 2
MS 3
\\-A
H'5
N*6
• HE-0
|2 i 3l 145.0S
1 18 1?
K 19
Il6 16m— —— . Sr^Kl!2 -^2?
X^100F PHflSE
1 4 .1 5 16 171250S 1050S
—* ————————— | ————————— ( ————————— ( ———————
\M4^ ^ 3? \i|L17 ,,^ 35 \( 28) j 36
/X 34-. (33) (34) '#52)x' - ' —— —
33 '(36) (35) (48)
TN (34) (36) TN
C 1 .0HZ?
1819850S
— i ————— \ ————s 101 xv ^0 - — -^^. \\
(30)^'v\lll x
(66) 54-— i— .(35)^ (68)
•^u —— i— \
(109)Xv (71)
i 10 1 11650S
— t ————— i ———60 72
f52 62 S
50 ;f 867
50 /' 79
^77 '^
1 12 1 13 I450S
— i ————— i ————— t —58 \ 80 x
79 ^\ 72 61
76 ) 63 ( ,*
82 X 63 56
71 58
14 I 15 1 16 1 17 1 18 1 19 1 20 1 21 1 22256S 50S 150H ' 350N
——— i ————— i ————— t ————— , ————— t ————— ( ————— i ————— i ————58 ^Jtf^ \ 2S \ 18 17/11 N*l -
f' ——— ™l ^. —— -- N *, '
\Ql \ 62 X;. 21 }/ l i 11 11 M*2 -\ X \.\ f/ , ——— v
46^Y\ 89 \ 57 \4C 14 ';i'6-9 "X\ 12 ( 9-7 H :: 3 '
51 \ 89 \ 50X;\ 15 \X6-S ^ X 1P N*4 -X ^^^"^- ^v, m '* - - \ X\
60 } 48 N v 76 ^ 51 -^ 15 X " : 5.3 H*5 -
POWERLINE
HE-0 METftL FflCTOP
1314 i e i 11 -121450S i25es 850S 650S. 45GS
13 l 14250S
l 17^ 18T 1 Ci 21ses l 5OH 350N
IUII
^9 .^ 2-JjT N30"5 XN?!:I x 630 ^ ^i^/ VZ8-^
^ 425 \71 x/ 24y\ r—\ / \ \ /^ ' N\^(892)774(171)Hv(435) v^548)\^191 ^^ 21 J V^
F '\~^^ \ s?**^: —— N^ v^\ f/ '•^^(452) (402)^(75)^- (217)) V (621))^ 66^-"^ 132
58 x\ 26\
X?\ 17 ;) \ 52 ; 33 -
.8 .8
(171) (157) TN
^ s 6 r~-x)/' 32 //{ 13 { 7.9
''' ' '3@ '
H s l -
.4
41 xx 5.2
H l 14 115116 117 118119 l 0256S 50 15SN 350H
^8 ,\ 221 x\ 634 t \ \1616 \218d 2144 XX \\ ; \\ \
2121
s 214 C; \1605 \2550 2793 2320""'•x -*'n ( 3652 3699
4518
4
21 l 2 2
Ha l
N^2
'' 434 /y 64?: ^^241 " :s'-v 677 Vi, '15*4 \ 2912) ,'' N'i N\ f \ \
3 ff 574 •••'763" :-^''!83^v -'' 96S X- l 1667V -'332' H = 5
DWG M O. - l . P -5370-
SEEMAR MINES L IMITED6 . BOOS T L ft I M S
HEMLO fiREfl ONTARIO
I
LINE NO . -i?
13 l 14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l 18 l 19 l 20 l 21 2256S 50S 150N ' 350N
88
63
\28' \ 13
61 \ 31 X 62 N/. 21\\ f
\ 89
56 51 \ S? \
58 60/ '
''
17 s 1 1
11 11 11
12
C^ 15 \^ 6.8W ":;X 51 V^V 15 : 5.8
N*2 -
^X—Xr
JLJ.
PLOTTING POINT ——
SX s 100'
SURFACE PROJECTION C'F flNOMflLOUS ZONE
DEFINITE ————— VPPOBflBLE •••••••••* ^POSSIBLE •m^'v^.^ V
13 l 1 4 [ 15 l 16 l 17 l 18 l 19 l 20 l 21 l 22250S 0S 15 CM 35EIN
FREQUENCY (HERTZ)I.S HZ.
NOTE- CONTOURS flT LOGARITHMIC INTERVALS, l , - i 5 -2, -3, -5.- -7.5. -l d
1984
PHOEHIX GEOPHYSICS LTDINDUCED r : LflRIZRTIQN
fi N D REST!.": V I T Y S U R V E Y
B . BOOS C L ft I M'S ' L I N E - 2 E RHO -TOHM-M)
1 9" i 10 l 11 l 12 l 13D I F' Q L E H U M B E R,C O O R D I H ft T E 1308 S l 6 O Q S l 4 0 6 S 12085 i o o e s 800S seesI H T ERFRETftTION
S l
S 4
H ^ 6
4868 3 ^Jll^y 96 ^1388 1373 Yx2365/ 1833^^20^-^ 142
25i "\5^^:;"15KJ^;^/ :, 8 ^ 16 fcjav213 jg"
8686, -: : -' 1:?
35
B .
DIPOLECOORDI
BOOS C
N U M B EHftTE
I H T E R F R E T ft T I- H s 1
- H s 2
L ft I M S
R18
ON10
00S
12
16 \
LINE-2E
1 2 11600
— i ————— ( —
^~" x* A jf A J ,
X=100F PHBSE (1
31415S 1400S———— H ————— i ————
.y/ V— -f/i' 45 ^.(24)
l 6 11200
— i ————— * —,-' 25 f///
(24)A"V 89
7 1';,
OQ , .\. ^ ^,
8HZ)
S i 91000S
. 49 y 65
74 6
110 111800S
i ————— i ——— 50 62
8 xTiT
1 1260
f' -.10 1/,'' '-~^c 33 #Y-J
1 130S
4 ————————
- 58
302?:\ 7
- N - 5
— 24/450) TN TN ( 42)
(44) TN TN (44) ''
-' (93) ) 70 83 31
. .
^ (g?) -^(26) (76) x 167 TN
•' ^
98
POWERLINE
B. BOOS CLft I MS LINE-2E METflL FftCTOR
i 4 l 5 i 6 l 7 l lie 111 112 113D I P O L E H U M B E RC CO R D I H ft T E 18O 0 S 1400: l 2 8 8 S 1000! 300: 600SINTERPRETftTIOH.
•f^3
• UxC,
.2V;-...
27 T; (598)
2-j^x- 3j4^fygg5Ay 41
\^TN
TN (201)^(67)—-^ TN (127) -^(35)
/•' /f 43
31^)^88 ""-^24 W , x/ \' "- 1/ ™
(5S3)V - '' 160 TN 33
X s l 0 @ F R H O f. O H M - M )
3 i
X * 1 0 0 F PHRSE
4 | 5 1 6 1 71400S 12003
(1 . 0 H Z )
18 19 1 10 1 11 110003 800S
.12 113 114 |15 i 1 6 117 118 119 120 i 2 1
600S 400S 200S 0 200Hl 2 2
• -tiiiii
V\^ 45
49)
TN
TN
67 x 42 x 25 /,-y 89
^(24) (24y\\ 89 ^\
(40) TN (49) j (69)
TN (42) d50) Cx^—— — -^^^
TN (44) '(26) -^8
,- -,. 49 ,' 65 50 62 f' --
51 74 68 /'" 75 93jf \ f
/' ( 93) J 76 ' 83 99
(96) x (73) TN 117 \ 88fc""'" S'^- (67) "'(26) (76) ^ 107
Jgl^ 58 53 -^45 \-^^^5-7 e-4 5.9
^^^\72 <yi^)7^x42 \ Z4 :\J-?/ 5.7 /' 4.1vx ~-"i- — -^ — - \ \. NI'V .' -'
~fCi "Vv 71 "J-^ V "f* *- A n \ •'-•-' '-NV *T ~J -1' yl "J ,1 1 r J xv. Ol -5 'C. x ii ••-. 41;? sx i/ ^^.^b.i- ^-' 4. r 4.1
- " 100^S- 10"*^- 30 \ 64 N\ 43 \ 28 v^^ 2.3 "N, 3.1x '"'N '"^-— ^gT — " f
TN 98 TN 31 v 59 v 41 3© "^ 4
1-1=1 -
H'2 -
H-3 -
' N s 4- -
H e — D "
H a 6 .-
POWERLINE
X=100F METflL FfiCTOR
l 5 10 l l 12 L 13 14 l 17 l 18 19 l 21 l 221400S 1203S 1000S 3003 600S 400S 200: 0 2 e e H
•HinMUMUIN
TN TN (351) A * (48) (583) -'160
^227 ^/(598) '"(299)
25?) ' 1563) TN (260)\J459) (465)x'.-^"^^^"*!
TN TN (201^(67) .1
(127) --(35) 1-1 =
16 17 18 19 c y3 e s 2 0 0 S 2 0 e H
632 11
1208 126S38 A1764 1822
'•- 5626747^2614 2463
-'32?!
14 l 15 k 16 l 17 l IS 119 l 20. l 21 i~2400S 200S e e o N
53 -^
42
6.4 5.9
) 5.7/4.1/
32 V 72 \ 49 \ 27""
30 \ 64 \ 43 \28
TN 31 x 5? 41
. -,"
4.7 4.1
3.1
N a 6
14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l 18 l 19 l 20 l 21 l 2 2400S 200: 2 0 6 N
S
DUG NO . - I . P -5370-2
SEEMflR MINES LIMITEDB B O : S C L ft I M S
HEMLO flFr* ONTflPIO
LINE ND . -2 E
<— X—-X- -X—X-
-01
PLOTTING
SURFACE PROJECT 10"- OF ftHOMflLOUS ZONE
DEFINITE PPOBRBLE POSSIBLE
r ••••••••it ^z ^ ^^^.-^ V
FREQUENCY (HERTZ? 1.0 HZ .
NOTE- CONTOURS RT L O G R R I T H M I C INTERVflLS. l,-l.5- 2 , - 3 , - 5 , - 7 . 5 , - l 0
D B T E S 1984
DfiTE
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD
INDUCED F ' LRRIZflTION
ND RESIST: vi TV SURVEY
B. BOOS CLRIMS L I N E-4 E X*100F RHO COHM-M)
D I P O L E H U t1 B E R 3 l 4 Tie l 11 i 12 i 1.3-C O O P D I H R T E 1600 S 14Q0S 1000! S 0 0 S goe;INTERPPETflTION
3672^r 61 N^ 127/^2583 \167l v^4657/ \\18K// 6731 5423^ y 9257 ^ l IK //y \2S 11 /f x^714 ^
•H* 3 113 A, 50—i- ^ ' X•' 6 7 ,- x, '' 964) \
srs ( 4176 '*-'389 Vx ' 1144
\4411 3211 3438H\1331\ ff 'V
2527 ^1346Xs2365 2897^254^116
^™*T319
640
480 •-~^s. 683 v 408
B .
DIPOLCOORDINTER
- N s 1
•N*2
44 = 3
•H*4
•H.6
BOOS CLRIMS LINE-4E X=100F PHRSE -C1.0H2) l
E NUMBER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1.9 110111 12ll3l|INRTE 1300S 1600S 1400S 1200S 1000S 300S 600S 1PRETRTION i t i i i i t i t i i' i J
45 r- 70 -, 34 x 27 \ 39 \v 1S S 2® 23 y ^ 30 36 47 /' 5- X 32 /^'
68 \\(106jfc;-\48 \29 X 36 X 22 25 \ 40 36 36 \ 54 52 ^ 82 y '^^]
62 (55) *50^\ 22 \ 38 \ 25 29^* 30 45 48^ 5S: 74 52^
(57) /(42) 43 \ 24 \ 38 v 21 /' 37 ( 20 )y 66 58 f 78 } ~/ 43 (4CV^ X. \ ^ N ——— *~~t:~ X- ——— X*
(57) "'- (48) 46 x 29 TN 41 43 '"(73) 6 1 70 ^44 41
POWERLINE
X=10eF METRL FRCTOFB. BOOS CLRIMS ' LIHE-4E
DIPOLE NUMBER 110 111
INTERPRETflTION
,3 /jc' 1.7 xf \\ 8.3'
1.1 \s 2.3 .4
9 ^X2-l /\ .3 ^;V—-' v^
(144)13 '
(157)N (134)' '9.8
3.8 - .2
" x 9.5 ^"36 ^ ^ZA^ ' 10
X*100F RHO (OHM-M)
1406S 12 0 e sT9 l 9 l 18 l 11 l 12 l 13 l 14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l IS l 19 l 20 l 21 l 22
1000S s 0 e s 600S 400S 200 206N
.2583 s 167 1 \N 4657/ \ \18K// 6fc, /- —— -X XN f \-— — ~ "
9257 ^\2311 A v.71\ X/ V;\
14 24
^^284^,1710/^7335 5418/^2451 X 4411 3211 3438 ) ^133^^9^/^2330/1932 ^6#
Tj^^;7006V:^575^31^^726' \ 2527 ^i346\:,2365 2897\^254 \^ 16^^218X^2161X^.
'5/^^44^ 356 323 364/538
576 541 635 /" 882
*2 X& UK Wl00 1/964Y\ 1854 "X. 2322^3/764 K\\ 1714,^319 480^•"•'•-' - t.'.' ^!*,. s i -, --———,/f.- —————— VN—^—'ST' —^. — —^^B^***t^ v'% l Ir-. .^?\1W^' so**/ ^. ioc"t x c.^c.c.s// r ot \\ if i*tx0/ ^-i^ i*v ^m. to /^^ij'.."--/ \ ^rr":- -^iiH^i 1.1^:? i c.* 3
^. ^^s^/ \ /,-^r-. l 'x *"—p^--——---±zsg^r\ ,-—-\ ^^ ^ f \ /---,V-____,,. .3^.^) 464^* 4176^*389 x--''1144 "- 1638-^542 640 -^ 194 v- ' 683 x 408 "^ 47^**' 1 875"—' 40ft0 NN 1509 1592^ 1462
X866 858 868 f 1 105 1264' XT
t13587\ 2996 "-V1140 1229 1205 1431y \
H s
X=100F PHflSE (l.0H2)
1.9 l 10 l 11 l 12 l 13 l 14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l 18 l 19 l 20 l 21 l'1400S 200: 000S 8 0i3 S 600S 400S 200S 0 200H
27 \ 39 \\ 18 s 20
X. 29 x \
22X\ 22 \ 38 X 25
\43 X 24 \ 38 ' 21
(48)X
46 x 29 TN 41
POWERLINE
METflL FflCTOP
1 7 l S l 9 110 111 112 113 114 115 J16 117 118 li 9 l 20 l ~TT c. z.1400S 1200S 1000S 300S 600S 400S 200S 0 :00N
m. .3 Xx 1.5 -vx .8
.6 v
.6 v 1.8 x .08 .6c\
.f
A .3
.9 .4 '\ 1.3 \ .07 .4 .2
10 TN .8 .3 x 1.T'- .04 .3
1-1 -
15 l 1 6 l 17 110
20 l 21 l 220 0 H
356
576 541 S35/'" 882
858 868 /7l05 1264
!)\ 299SJXll40 1229 1205 1431
73- v' 40a0 N:"" 7s09 1592"^ 14*52
N s 1 -
H" 4
N = 5
DWG HO -I P -5370-3
S E E M R R MINES LIMITEDB. BOOS CLAIMS
HEtlLO AREA x ONTARIO
LINE NO.-4E
•Ntf- \, /-. _ V - - -——. . ... —— 7 ^ -
r~®nrr rr
r*-.
PLOTTING POINT ——
SURFflCE PROJECTION OF ANOMALOUS ZONE
DEFINITE PROBABLE POSSIBLE ^^^
FREOUEHCY (HERTZ) l 0 H2
NOTE- C O M T O U PJB AT'LOGARITHMIC INTERVALS, l,-1.5-2--3,-5,-7 . 5,- 10
DATE S APPROV
384
DATE
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTDINDUCED P O L R R I Z R T I O H
RHD RESISTIVITY SURVEY
B. BOOS C L R I M S : L IN E-6 E XM00F RHO (OHM-M)
DIPOLE H UMBER 1415 1718 i e in r 12 i 13 . l UCOORDINATE 1300S 16Q0S l 4 0 6 S S09S 606SI N T ER P P E T R T I O N
*k
-'7574 -' '4809 x 2494 '"1209^ 2674 x 1522 v x 3247
3456 4255 ^1907 /' 1030 x;v 681 f*v-y—-j'1704X^-*
950
B BOOS CLAIMS : LI
DIPOLE NUMBER 1COORDINRTE 1300 SINTERPRETATION
9=1 69 64 \x
9 = 2 53 51
9 = 3 *Z)
•9 = 4 58
•9 = 5
•9 = 6
NE-6E
2 1 3160QS
———— i ———31 35
X"*6 f61 '\ 30'
(68) M\
56 (55)
X-190F PHASE
1
— i —
729
\
.28\
4 1 51400S
28 x 34 "v
'^4 ^v
27 23
26
2? -'30
1611200
— i ————— t —
\5^X, 33 X 23\ 35
2f. \ 3q130
73
21
31
36
' l . 0 H2 )
18 191000S
^ x 14 / s 3 1
28 /*" 33
33 36
32 37
36 37
1 10
x 25"X
34 \
32
35 ,,mf'
, f'' 57
1 11 1 12 1 13 18003 600S
' '21 y 3V^-4/^25^X 33 f* 24 '^^^1.-
/50~^ (' 26 22 ^7 7 V "-' 51 /" 31 \ 28 267 \. ————
-1 32 30 32
1-fer3
^'POWERLINE
B. BOOS CLRIMS : LINE-6E XMQ0F METRL FACTOR
DIPOLE MUHBER J__L l 8 110 111 l 12 l 13 l lCOOPD IN R T E 1800S 1600S 1400! 1200S 1000: S00S 600SINTERPRETATION immnn
115 116 117 l 18 119 l 20 i 21 | 22400S 260 H
N s 2793 /\y*67 359 x 255 ,- 397 x 553l- — --' V!- —— r — ——— "— — ' 536
7 X582 X 647 X" 865
^2623\1524^.^36\^591 ('889 960 732
X,749^ 964 881 .
1 = 2 H
N-4 H
822^'- 4249 "x 2766 "^ 1470 ^ 773 84?"
DUG. NO.-I p-53TO-4
SEEMflR MINES LIMITEDB BOOS CLAIMS
HEMLO AREA ONTARIO
LINE M O . - 6 E
l 13 l 14 i is i 16 l 17 l is l 19 l geLgjr7T~Ig!60QS 400S 2Q0S 0 00N
15 V S:, 4.0 \// ! y
N = 4 -
H X -
PLOTTING POINT —— -\ x.
SURFflCE PROJECTION OP flNOMfiLOUS ZONE
DEFINITE —————— TPROBABLE •••••••t*i ^7POSSIBLE ^^^ V
:. t
lERLINE
^ l 13 .1 14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l 18 T 19 120 { 21 l 22"600S 409S 200S 0 2 0 0 N
2.7 3.8 XV-.08
|2 "' ' 1-9 N N 3.7
FREQUENCY (HERTZ)1.0 HZ.
NOTE- CONTOURSflT LOGARITHMICI N T E R V R L S . l , - l 5
DRTE RPPROV
SUP, 984
DATE
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTDINDUCED POLARIZATION
AND P E S I S T l V I T Y S U RVE V
B . BOOS C L R I M i - L l M E-8 E X - l e 0 F P H O r O H M - M )
DIPOLE H U M BEFC O O P D I N R T E___17-0 0 l l 5 O C S 130CS i lees sees
111 112 113oes -00s
MM
•9 = 2
• H = 3
• H = 4
•9 = 5
•9 = 6
110 -V;4e2b 4756
?88.,--"~~ 5443 ' 12
/X 9455,,;. \2411 f - 5188. :-:-\326 x679 533 \ 3334
5 Jy62i35xv' l Vf 'M 3 7ir 420e 3707X^939 \ 636 f
087? x-2570 -
JVC'4133 4604 .-"2616 2457
825 j' 1302^
1002 ( 1 862
X 2247 2444 2477 X 3937^ 1247 1246 V- '^
B. BOOS CLfllMS LIHE-8E X*100F PHRSE t. l . 9
DIPOLE NUMBER l l e 111 l 12 113C O O R D I H fi T E 1700S 1500S 1300S l l O O S 'if 03 i00SI H T E R P R E T R T I O N
1-4=1 33 .- 29___29 25 -,. 38 30.- 25 ; \ li __ 12 l^y ^ 2 1 v^^l-9 \ l ^
44 ^ 26 /' 36 }' v\ 13 ; \ 24 \ 41 \29 /' 16 ? i ~*^///' 27 22 27 :^jr4-4 ~2
32 **/' 2 1 X 16 \ 24 \ 37 ^ ^ 16 X 10 /X 27 /' 31 \ 22 ^3fv\^^-6.3'—— \ /.--'^ /' f \ \ X^ 42 y' 20 24 . 17 \21 22^;/ ^ }// ^ ^38 _ 3 1 \ 22 \ 33 xx^C~
29 23 25 N ' 14~~ ^73^-- ^ 14 ''^27 -7 33 - 28 ' 32 X " 23 \ 35^
- M s 6
POWERLINE
DC
B. BOOS CLfllMS LIHE-8E
IPOLE NUMBER l 2 l 3OORDIHRTE 1788-S 1500S
? ^mmm^B^m ;v^.-w^
X = 1 O 0
14151300S
F M E T fl L
1 6 11 10
t
0S
F fi C T 0 R
J 8 1900S
a 1 10 i 11
700S1 12
5k •IHmilllttUIUIIHIIIIIHIH
100
— l —
1s
3 |
— iMM .6 \ 1.1
.4
.4 .3
.4
-.4 .3
.4 .2
,
^.7 v;.^2.3 \ 3.8 ^ -.5
•' 1 1 ~- x X- r\\ ^ 4 -- 7 Qi* i v *O '\ " \ ^*" '-N O*O
A
.4
.1
.1 .1
.2 , 1.1
7 - J' i -;- ir• •^* X.h. ^. 11l* x
\'- ~~—:
c- \ x l o v.C1 1.'^ ^ o(
x - 1 0 0 F P H 0 r 0 H M - M :^
i30es 9 6 D Sl 10 l 11 l 12 l 13 l 14 l 15 l 16 l 17 l ~T8~ 19
7005 sees 00s 190S 1 0 0 Hnn
3 00 H
29.' - t-267 5288 x4561,,;- 9455,,;. \24117 -5188. \\326 -x.679 533 \334 319
3717 4206 3707""X?3Sl v 63* -r 9®5 X 610Nx\
387 402 460 404 378
37-47 f :. 9?3//s
l^i/ .V. -7-*--. —' lil K f,y' 3 i w .-
f'/''087; ,- 2570 3
554 615 606 60? 509"'--, 430
825 7 1382 1007 1415X.706 799 656 527 X. 489
642? 5670)'vX 21KX^4133 4604 .-"2616 2457 -, 3728Xx^l 102 1002 ( 1862 X 1214 ^98 754) 690 608 551
^- *"3?3 '"'?86e -'674? x 4784 -'2247 2444 2477 N 3937^-1247 1246 X ''2133"-;"x 1491 X 932 ''"06 633 617
H - 1 -
PHflSE t. l . 0 HZ)
15 I 16 l 1
30.- 25 / \ H
2.1^3^,4.5V; 4.3 -A 4 .1\VCJ\24 'x 41 \29 / 16' '16 S 10^X27 /' 31 \ 22 -3.6 1.416 24 5 -5.1
31 22 ^___ ' '- V"
POWERLINE
X=100F METFIL FfiCTOR
? 41516171819110)111300S 1100S 900S 700S
i 12.1 13500S
v*.-*. ••NmmMMnnmMHtiMMH— —— ————— i ————— i ————— i ————— i ————— t ————— t ————— i ————— " ————— " ————.l/ .4 .7 .7 .3 .5 .2 \\1.7 ..- \3~~" 'K ,V /' \
.T .2 .7 .3 .4 .2 .7 *vs!\2.3 \ 3.8
-.4 .3X-,\
1 14 | 15 1 16 1 17 1 18 1 19 1 20 1 21 1 22300S 100S 100H 300H-
V 1.3 1.3 1.2 ,- .7 xj^/ .6 N*l -
-.3 .2 .7 .4 .7 -.08 y 1 ' Hs2 -
.4
.4
.3 .4 .2 y'' 1.1 '"-, .8 \Nx 2.4 \ 3.8 \\ -.5 -.4V "V ' - "'. V ^E.
1 7 ''" 1 "^ 17 11"- P ^ "-- l ft v ? o '^•- — "^. l *O i**l i.%5 1*1 kO l**J t.*v . -'
.1 .3 .5 .02 .7
-.1 .4 -.1 .4 -.3
-.4 .01 -.1 .4 -.8
-l
MS 4
N ' 5
A T 15 l 16 li 18 119 120 l 2160S 109S 100N 00 H
319 387 402 460 404 378
554 615 606 60? 509 X 430
007 1415^/^706 70'? 656 527 X X4S9
^.;89S 754) 6?0 608 551 ":133v'x 032 ' 766 633 617
1-1=1 -
14 l 15 I 16 117 I 18 T 19 21 1 22300S 100 100H 00N
,' 4 .8 3.2
4.5 2.4 } 4.3 / -.4 4.1s t s A? yv".1 ^~- .- -^ ^ *#-
3.6 \ 1.4' .2.3 s' 3.3, -IF . 1 ^-C 3.5 y^ -5.1\,...,.,, "'w-- . ' c/-^ ' ••'••'' '- ~ —^'/'
-4 -.1 '^^3.2,4f -1 /^y 2.5 jf -4.6'-••••nTS'i^' /'V fe
7.2 -5.5 .1 -.8 ^2.3 -*'' ' -5.1
H — 3
Ns4
H - 5
14 l 15 l 16 117 j 1 8 119 I 20 l 21300S 100S 100N 306H
1.3 1.3 1.2.,- .7 vJL-' .6
.2 .7 .4 .7 -.08 \± i
-.4 .1 .3 .5 .02 .7 -l
-.3 -.1 .4 -.1 ' .4 -.8
-.3 -.4 .01 -.1 .4 -.8
11=1 -
\\ = 3
f^4
DWG H O.-I.P-5370-5
S E E M fl R MINES LIMITEDB . B O O S C L R I M S
HEMLO fiREfl x ONTflRIO
LINE NO .-SE
N y. -V^r—X-
r-EHrH rr ! i
PLOTTING POINT —— X" l 08'
SUPFfiCE PROJECTION OF RNOMflLOUS ZONE
DEFINITE . ————" TPROBfiBLE ••••••••M JpPOSSIBLE ^^^^^ V
FREQUENCY (H E R T 2) l . 0 H2
NOTE- CONTOUR? R T LOGftRITHMIC INTERVfiLS. l,-l.5 -2,-3,-5, -7. 5,-10
DflTE flPPRO
1984
DPTE
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.INDUCED POLfiPIZftTION
ft N D R E S I S T I w I T Y S U R V E Y
wMinistry ofNaturalResl
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
Type of Survey(s)
Claim Holder(s)
Address
Survey Company
42C13NW0071 8.6590 MOLSON LAKE
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)
TDate of Survey (from Si to)O*H 02 S4 i n oa ^.4] Day L.Mo, J ^r - J-?iV j MouJ- Yr^
Total Miles of line Cut
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days H) 'CJ
Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here ,, ,
MINING
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
k ki V E DA i vwr*
- Magnetometer
LANt^rSfCTIO- Other 1^
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
——————
Days per Claim
——————
4
JSl
Days perClaim
— - ———
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may ho apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits por claim selected in columns at right.
Mining ClaimPrefix
TBNumber
feViS^fe \ Zft^ \O l ^ 1, If*
Expend. Days Cr.
^^3^vio f*
- ••- —
Mining ClaimPrefix Number
— ————— — — - —
--
Expend. Days Cr.
—— -- —
—————
Total number of mining ^ claims covered by this *N report of work, **^
For Office Use OnlyTotal DaysCr.pate Recorded Recorded
fiCertification Verifying Report of Work
o, having performed the workl hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexec or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address ol Person Certi
13G2 (81/9)
Ontario
To
Actidn T me Memo,
A'om (Name and City) jf j
^ /ri g , A* : jtsvuck^ ~ ^^~~ ^^-Area Code i Telephone No Message Taken By
f| PhonedOn
LJ Hold
Q Please Call Q Will Call BackP.. Returned .—.l_l Your Call l_l Wishes Appointment
r~| Waiting — in Person D Was Here
l Will 1 Return
QF.Ie
O Type Draft
[~] Type Final
Draft Reply For Q Provide Q] For Your . My Signature More Details Information
D For Your Approval r—i Keep Me anrt Rinnalnro l—' Informedand Signature
[—j Circulate, Initial — and Return
n Takek-J Appropriate Action
r—j Make ____ Return Copies '—' With CommentsD D Note and
See Me
fi Please Answer R l nves"9ate L-' L-' and Reportjport D Note and
Return
r~l Per Discussion
1~1 Per Your Request
D Returned With Thanks
D
Comments''
',.-Vi ^fit " -7 ' '
7540-1037 (Rev. 11(82) Q Over
1984 05 08 Our File: 2.6590
Mrs. A.M. HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6
Dear Madam:
He have received reports and maps for a Geophysical {Enduced Polarization) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims TB 613970 et al In the Area of Molson Lake.
This material will be examined and assessed and astatement of assessment work credits will be Issued.
We do not have a copy of the report of work which Is normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.
Yours ilncerely,
S.E. YundtDirectorLand Managment Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918
A. Barr:me
cc: Bernard Boos Seemar Miner Ltd Suite 19777 Burrard Street Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 1X7
Ministryof Geotechnical
Ontario ^ Approval
File
Mining Lands Comments
To: Geophysics
Comments
l l Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature
DTo: Geology - Expenditures
Comments
[~\ A pproved [~| Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature
To: Geochemistry
Comments
t L/*
l l Approved [~"[ W ish to see again with correctionsDate Signature
To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
aen
i
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s).
Township or Area.
Claim Holder{s)_
i -
Survey Company VH/yC*^ K Cy*
Author of Report -
Address of Author.Covering Dates of Survey.
Total Miles of Line(linecutting to office)
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer_
—Radiometric——
—Other—————.
DAYS per claim
Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic,(enter days per
** . .1
eton). Radiometric
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix) (number)
SEC?/
TC^TAL CLAIMS.
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
SURVEYS^ If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations
Station interval
Profile scale ^————
Contour interval.
Number of Readings
Line spacing ———
H W ^O
Instrument .
Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value —^—
W
InstrumentH W
dttH U W
flnil rnnfigiiratinn
Coil separation
Arnirary
Method: CD Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back CD In line Frrnnenrv
CD Parallel line
l
Parameters measured.
Instrument.Scale constant
Corrections made.
Base station value and location .
H
N
W UD Q
Elevation accuracy.
InstrumentMethod 52*rimc Domain
Parameters - On time- Off time __
Power.
— Delay time —.
— Integration time.\
CD Frequency Domain Frequency ——— Range
.
9Electrode array — Electrode spacing .
Type of electrode
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument—-————^^———.—-^—————————^——-.——^—^——————— Range.Survey Method ,^^———-————-———^^———^—^———————————.———.—.—
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument ———Values measured.
Energy windows (levels)——^.^-^——--^-—.^^—..—.—.^^—-—.,.^^^—.——-....———.——. Height of instrument_____________________________Background Count.
Size of detector—^-^^——-^^^———^^-^^—-—————-—————.^——--—.^^——..
Overburden ————^^—:—^—^———-^—^——.-——-.—^.—.——^^—.-.————.—^—-(type, depth — include outcrop map)
|OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)
Type of survey^^——-.———^———-—^^^^-^————
Instrument —.^^.^^^-^-^^—^^^^^..^^^ Accuracy—.^—^————^^^—————^——————Parameters measured.
Additional information {for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s).
Instrument(s) ——(specify for each type of survey)
Accuracy—————————^——^——(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used __^_^__^_^____^________^___^^^—__
Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude_______________________________i—Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples.
Type of Sample.(Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight———————
Method of Collection————————
Soil Horizon Sampled.
Horizon Development.
Sample Depth-———.
Terrain——————-—
Drainage Development———————————
Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODS
Values expressed in: per centp.p. m. p. p. b.
D D D
Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)
Others____________________________
Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used__
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -————^-^.-
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____
Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Reagents Used
.tests)
tests^^
.tests)
General. General.
Initial Check
Assessed
Approved Reports of Work sent out
Notice of Intent filed
Approval after Notice of Intent sent out
Duplicate sent to Resident Geologist
Duplicate sent to A.F.R.O.
Intermediate to Felsic Intrusive Rocks Pyrrhotite
Gossan(a) g ranodiorite(b) diorite/trondhiemite
B. BOOS CLAIMSFelsic I ntrusive R ocks
Strike and dip of foliation
Strike and dip of "second 1 foliation
Rock outcrop, small
Area of outcrop
TB ' TB 6l397d 613972(a) quartz ( >} - feldspar porphyry
(b) feldspar (:*) -quartz porphyry
Volcanic-Sedimentary Rocks
(c) greywacke(d) tuffaceous shale or siltstone(f) sericite and quartz-predominant in matrix(g) feldspar conspicuous in matrix (h) chlorite and/or biotite-rich matrixi) garnetiferousj) siltstone
(k) thinly bedded to laminated(l ) chloritic(r) rusty; sulphide bearing
Geological contact, approximate
Rock sample l ocation
Steep s lope
Swamp
Pit
Frost heave
large grancdioriticgentle S. slope
-Ofoo B.L. (e) banded g raphitic chert(k) rusty or ferruginous c herty rocks
balsam, poplar S birch cover LOCATION MAPlow, wet c
MOLSON LAKE AREA CLAIM MAP NO.G603
Felsic Volcanic Rocks
(a) massive(e) tuff(II) thinly bedded to laminated(S) silicified
cedar 6* sloping groundbirch c
LOW Intermediate Volcanic Rocks
large granodiorite Mafic Volcanic Rocksboulders
(a) massive(e) tuff(II) t hinly bedded to laminated
spruce S poplaro+OQ B.L
613971
lUMno outcropLOW
OWHK6Hrge g ronoauon
bouldersN. slope
low, flat ground
low, flat a round
fo moderate.*-"*l 5 c,f f k 7/af groundS.SE. slope towards pondl 5 -l07opo4
spruce 6 b alsam cover'cedar S sprucebalsam
ML 'DUM T. B. 613972granodiorite \ HIGHMEDIUMboulders
la.ejlor
5h.uklow, flat ground
5 c,f,k,l,r B.F-6 alder fi spruce
coverlow, flat \round
3970T. B. 6
o ge/M/y \ c—-MEDIUM
--T 5ffg,h(q.v.)
x 5j,k,l,rO-27ov.f.g.po)
x 51,r \
51 X If t. 60
MEDIUM
MEDIUM\
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITEDINDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
PLAN MAP
SEEMAR MINES LIMITEDB.BOOS CLAIM GROUPEXTENT OF I.R. SURVEY
THUNDER BAY M.D. ONTARIO REVISED ' M.W.R.
DATE ' MAR. 1984
APPROVED:
SURFACE PROJECTION OF ANOMALOUS ZONE - ZONES OF EQUAL RESISTIVITY IN BEDROCK
HIGH 5000 - 10,000 ii-m.
MEDIUM 1 000 - 5000 ii - m.
LOW < 1000 li-m.
DEFINITEPROBABLE 1 1111111111 POSSIBLE ^w^-v V
NUMBER AT END OF ANOMALIES INDICATES SPREAD USED.
MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.- ANOMALOUS I.P. ZONE
42C12NWe?7l 2.6S9* MOLSON LAKE 200 DWG. NO.-IP.R-4M5f