ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL AND MICRO STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR …€¦ · Analysis of Mechanical and Micro Structural Behaviour of Al Based Metal Matrix Composite Reinforced with Ball Milled

11

International Journal of Structural Engineering (IJSE)

Volume 1, Issue 1, July-December 2019, pp. 11-29, Article ID: IJSE_01_01_002

Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/IJSE/issues.asp?JType=IJSE&VType=1&IType=1

© IAEME Publication

ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL AND MICRO

STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR OF AL BASED METAL

MATRIX COMPOSITE REINFORCED WITH BALL

MILLED NANO PARTICLES: A REVIEW

Amit Raturi1, Anil Dhanola2, Dr. K. K. S. Mer3, Pradeep Kothiyal4

1, 2M.Tech scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering,

G.B.Pant Engineering College, Pauri Garhwal

3Associate Prof., Department of Mechanical Engineering,


4Ph.D scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering,


ABSTRACT

In recent years Metal matrix composites have been considered as one of the most important

materials which offer excellent wear resistance and stiffness, low weight, economic and high

strength to weight ratio. Metal matrix composites (MMCs) reinforced with ball milled nano particles

,also called metal matrix –nano composite, are spreading rapidly in worldwide due to their various

demands in the field of engineering and science like automobiles, aerospace, energy, defence,

materials, electronics and bio technology. Ball milling is a technique of production of nano particles

and can enhance the base material in terms of damping properties, mechanical strength, wear

resistance and prevent from clustering. Reinforcement of ball milled nano particles with aluminium

metal matrix yields excellent physical and mechanical properties. This review reveals that various

fabrication techniques are recently used for the production of Al based MMC such as powder

metallurgy, high energy ball milling, ultrasonic assisted casting, stir casting, compo casting. The

microstructure and mechanical properties of the composite were evaluated by X-ray diffraction

(XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Key Words: Aluminium Metal Matrix, Ball Milled Nano Particles, Mechanical Properties,

Microstructure.

1. INTRODUCTION

Composite materials are the materials in which the desirable properties of different materials

are combined to form a single material system. Composite material is a combination or mixture of

two or more materials. The composite material is usually better than its individual elements or

components as regards their properties or characteristics such as stiffness and strength etc.

Analysis of Mechanical and Micro Structural Behaviour of Al Based Metal Matrix Composite Reinforced

with Ball Milled Nano Particles: A Review

12

[G.R.Nagpal, material science khanna book publication, (2000)]. Composite posses excellent

stiffness and strength, high strength to weight ratio (high tensile strength, low density), high creep

resistance, high tensile strength, high toughness, low in weight. Among different composites, metal

matrix composite are promising new materials for recent engineering application having high

specific strength, stiffness and their high temperature stability and widely used in bio-medical,

aerospace and automotive industries. [Dandekar CR, et.al. (2011)].

Metal matrix composite is the engineered combination or mixture of a metal as a matrix and

some reinforcing material in the matrix. The matrix material can be aluminum, nickel, titanium,

super alloy, copper, magnesium and the reinforcing fiber may be graphite, alumina, silicon carbide,

and silicon nitride or boron carbide as well as wires of tungsten, titanium, molybedenum, beryllium

and stainless steel. [Degarmo et.al. (2006)]. In Aluminium matrix composite (AMC) the matrix

phase is of pure aluminium or an alloy of it and the reinforcement used is a non-metallic ceramic

such as Sic, Al2O3, SiO2, B4C, Al-N. Commercial aluminium matrix composite posses much higher

specific strength, good corrosion resistance, high damping capacity, good thermal and electrical

conductivities. Aluminium matrix composite have been tested and proved useful in different

engineering sector including structural and functional application. The main limitation of these type

of composite high production cost, complex fabrication technique for fiber-reinforced system.

[Himanshu kala, et.al. (ICMP 2014)]. Generally MMC can be classified into four types- (1) Particle

reinforced MMC. (2) Laminated MMC. (3) Fibre-reinforced composite. (4) Whisker-reinforced

MMC. [Krieder K.G., MMC, (Academic Press Inc, USA.)]

Aluminium Metal matrix composites reinforced with ball milled (nano particle), also called

metal matrix nano-composite, are being investigated in recent years, due to their promising

properties suitable for large number of structural and functional application.[Zhang, et.al.(A2008)]-

[Zhang, et.al.(Scripta Mater.2006)]. Ball milling technique can be successfully used for converting

the reinforcing particle into nano materials and improve the base material in terms of damping

properties, mechanical strength and wear resistance by distributing the ball milled reinforced particle

uniformly. Particulate reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite is recently used due to their cost

effective and isotropic properties and researchers are working on this field. The availability of a large

variety of reinforcing particle and the development of recently processing methods like high energy

ball milling, powder metallurgy, friction stir casting, and ultrasonic assisted casting are recently

being used for the production of Aluminium matrix nano composite. This paper reviews recent

studies on mechanical properties, processing and microstructure of aluminium- matrix composite

reinforced with ball milled nano particles.

2. PROCESSING TECHNIQUES OF ALUMINIUM MATRIX COMPOSITE

The processing techniques of Al matrix composite can be categorized into two main groups

(a) Liquid State processes: This process include Stir casting, compo casting, ultrasonic assisted

casting, squeeze casting, and spray casting.

(b) Solid state processes: This process include powder blending followed by consolidation (powder

metallurgy), high energy ball milling, diffusion bonding, and friction stir process.

2.1 Stir casting: In a stir casting process particulate reinforcement (usually in powder form) are

distributed into molten Al matrix by mechanical stirring. This process was initiated in 1968 by

S.Ray. S.Ray. (1968) introduced alumina particle into a molten Al matrix by mechanical stirring.

Mechanical stirring in furnace is the key element of this process.

Su et al. (2012) designed a new three step stir casting method for fabrication of nano particle

reinforced composite. First the reinforcement and Al particles are mixed using ball mills to break the

initial clustering of nano particles. The composite powder is then incorporated into the melt with



13

along with mechanical stirring. After adequate stirring the composite slurry is sonicated using an

ultrasonic probe or transducer in order to improve the distribution of reinforced particles.

Hamid Reza Ezatpour et al. (2013) Al6061/nano Al2O3 composites were fabricated by stir

casting process through injection of Al2O3 particles into the molten Al alloy by argon gas along with

stirring using a mechanical stirrer and fabrication of nano composites with reasonable distribution of

Al2O3 in the matrix alloy with low agglomeration and low porosity.

Abhishek Kumar et al. (2013) used a 3 phase induction motor for electromagnetically stirring

the aluminium melt and showed improvement in particle matrix interface bonding with a small grain

size structure.

A recent development in stir casting technique is a double stir casting or two-step mixing

process. In this technique, initially the matrix material is heated to above its liquidus temperature.

The melt is then cooled down to a temperature between the liquidus and solidus points to a semi-

solid state. At this point the preheated reinforcement particles are mixed and added. Again the slurry

is heated to a fully liquid state and mixed thoroughly. In double stir casting technique the resulting

microstructure has been found to be more uniform as compared with conventional stirring. The

potency of this two-step mixing method is mainly due to its ability to break the gas layer around the

particle surface which otherwise impedes wetting between the particles and molten metal. Thus the

mixing of the particles in the semi-solid state helps to break the gas layer because of the abrasive

action due to the high melt viscosity. The major characteristics of stir casting process are relatively

low cost, simple and applicable to mass production of MMC.

Fig.1 process of stir casting

2.2 Compo Casting: stir casting is one of the best technique of producing Al matrix composite

however it suffers from poor distribution and incorporation of the reinforcement particles in the Al

matrix due to which wettability is reduced of the particles with melt. To overcome these type of

problems development of recent techniques for addition of milled particles (powder form) to metallic

melt which showed that better incorporation and uniform distribution of reinforcement particle into

matrix. Compo casting is a liquid state process in which reinforcement particles are added to

solidifying melt while being vigorously agitated. [Flemings M C. (Metallurgical transactions, 1991)].

This technique will result in better distribution of reinforcement particles and low volume shrinkage

of metal matrix alloy.



14

Fig.2 Process of compo casting

2.3 Squeeze casting: This process was introduced in the United States in 1960. Squeeze casting,

also known as liquid metal forging, is a combination of casting and forging process. The molten

metal is poured into the bottom half of the pre-heated die. As the metal starts solidifying, the upper

half closes the die and applies pressure during the solidification process. The applied pressure and

instantaneous contact of molten metal with die surface produces rapid heat transfer that yields a

porous free casting.

The squeeze casting process has been widely used to produce quality castings and offers

excellent surface finish, high metal yield, minimum shrinkage, porosity and low operating cost.

Aluminum, magnesium, and copper alloy components are readily manufactured using this

process. Squeeze casting is capable of producing light weight, high integrity automotive component

such as engine block, brake disc, piston etc. [R.S.Rana et al. (IJSER 2012)].

Fig.3 Process of squeeze casting [http://www.substech.com]

2.4 Powder Metallurgy: Powder metallurgy is the technique of blending fine powders of metals or

ceramic materials, pressing them into a desired shape and then heating the compressed material in a

controlled atmosphere to bond the material (sintering). Ball milling technique can be used to achieve

mechanical alloying of powder mixtures for enhances the mechanical properties. Powder metallurgy

is the most economical technique for fabrication of Al MMCs and can prevent from agglomeration

and segregation of the reinforcing particles. In powder metallurgy homogeneity of mixture is better

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sintering



15

controlled, component is produced with good dimensional stability, good ductility and provides a

better blend homogeneity.

Certain metals that are difficult to manufacture by other technique can be shaped by powder

metallurgy such as tungsten filaments for incandescent, lamp bulbs, oil-impregnated bearings, gears

and filters. [John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (M. P. Groover2002)].

Fig.4 Process of powder metallurgy. [R.S.Rana et al. (IJSER2012)]

2.5 High energy ball milling: High energy ball milling technique which is used to produce various

nanocrystal powders in high energy planetary, vibratory mills and ball. This technique is used

producing metallic and ceramic nano materials. Ball mill is a type of grinder which is used in mixing

materials like ceramic, ores, paints, and chemical. These balls rotate around a horizontal axis. These

balls can be made from ceramic, stainless steel, silicon carbide. Ball mills are widely used in

mechanical alloying. [Florez-Zamora et.al (2008)]. Mechanical alloying could successfully to

produce uniform distribution of oxide particles (Al2O3) and fine particles. It has several advantages

such as cost effective, grinding medium and power is low. Suitable for continuous and batch

production. Uniform distribution of narrow particle which improves mixing of sample. Ball milling

technique is used for nano grinding, mechanical alloying, homogenizing, size reduction and colloidal

milling. It has several applications in the field of engineering and science such as agriculture,

chemistry, metallurgy, ceramics, medicine, pharmaceuticals, and construction materials.

[www.restech.com]



16

Fig.5 Process of motion of the balls and powder mixture and set up of ball milling. [http://al-

chemist.info/node/10].

3. COMPRASION OF DIFFERENT PROCESSING TECHNIQUE

Table 1. Comparison of various processing technique Process Advantages Limitations

Stir casting

Stir casting is one of the most economical

techniques of processing Al MMC. The

major advantages of stir casting process are

its applicability to mass production, easier

control of matrix structure, simplicity and

good matrix-particle bonding.

Difficulties with geometry of

mechanical stirrer and position

of stirrer in melt. It is difficult

to distribute and dispersion of

ball milled nano particles

uniformly in metal melts.

Compo casting

This technique will result in better

distribution of reinforcement particles and

low volume shrinkage of metal matrix

alloy. In the compo castings has been

attributed to the better wettability between

the matrix and the reinforcement particles.

Costly than the stir casting

Squeeze casting

The major advantages of squeeze casting

process are to produce quality castings and

offers excellent surface finish, high metal

yield, minimum shrinkage and porosity.

High tooling and equipment

cost.

Powder Metallurgy

Powder metallurgy is the most economical

technique for fabrication of Al MMCs and

can prevent from agglomeration and

segregation of the reinforcing particles and

component is produced with good

dimensional stability, good ductility and

provides a better blend homogeneity.

In processing technique of

Hydroxide and Aluminium

oxide films coating the

powder.[Dinesh Kumar koli et

al.(ICMPC2014)]

High energy ball

milling

Ball milling technique can be used to

achieve mechanical alloying of powder

mixtures for enhances the mechanical

properties. It has several advantages such as

cost effective, grinding medium and power

is low.

Ball milling technique produce

crystal defects and shape of

nano material can be irregular.



17

4. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

The mechanical properties of a Metal matrix composite depend on many factors such type of

reinforcement, shape, size, quantity of reinforcement etc. The actual knowledge of the mechanical

behaviour is thus necessary as they are employed in different fields.

Ruixiao Zheng et al. (2013) evaluated the mechanical properties of Al-2024 matrix composite

were fabricated by using powder metallurgy method. To evaluate the mechanical properties of the

composites, compression tests were conducted at room temperature under uniaxial compressive

loading and the stress–strain curves are shown in (Fig.6.) Shown that, the compression strength value

of MMCs is significantly higher than that of the matrix alloy, suggesting that the Fe based metallic

glass particle (FMG) can strongly enhance the mechanical strength of the Al matrix. In particular,

MMCs exhibit yield strength of about 403 MPa and fracture strength of about 660 MPa combined

with an appreciable plastic strain at fracture of about 12%. Metallic glass particles significantly

improve the mechanical behaviour of the MMCs.

Fig.6 Stress strain curve of the composite and the Al-2024 alloy prepared by milled powder and as

atomized powder. [Ruixiao Zheng et al. (2013)]

Hamid Reza Ezatpour et al.(2014) Fabricated Al6061/nano Al2O3 composite by stir casting

process through injection of Al2O3 particle into the molten Al alloy by argon gas along with stirring

by the help of mechanical stirrer. The mechanical properties of Al6061 were investigated. To

investigate the mechanical behaviour of the composites the tensile tests were carried out using Zwick

760 testing machine according to ASTM: B557M – 10. The crosshead speed was set at 3 mm/min on

the round specimens. In (Fig.7 a) shown that the influence of nano particle content on hardness

represent in the as –cast state and in the extruded condition. The effect of nanoparticles on the

increasing of hardness mainly due to Hall–Petch mechanism, particle strengthening and grain

refinement. In the as-cast state, hardness increases with increasing reinforcement content up to 1 wt.

% Al2O3 but thereafter the hardness decreases. This is due to the heterogeneous dispersion of

nanoparticles and high porosity content. However, after applying hot extrusion process, hardness of

all samples increases continuously with increasing Al2O3 content. By the help of stress strain curve

the yield stress and tensile strength increase while fracture strain decreases with increasing particle

content. (Fig.7 b) shows the variation of 0.2% yield strength of the composite with different nano-

Al2O3 weight fractions before and after extrusion. It is clear that all composites provide higher

strength than that of the Al alloy in the as-cast and extruded states. This is because of the grain

refinement and particles strengthening.



18

Fig.7(a) Hardness variation of composites

with nano Al2O3 Content in as –cast state and

in extruded condition.[Hamid Reza Ezatpour

et al.(2014)]

Fig.7(b). 0.2% variation in yield strength of

the composite with nano Al2O3 Content as-

cast state and in extruded condition.

(Fig.7 b) also shows that in the as-cast state, with increasing Al2O3 particle content up to 1

wt. %, yield strength increase continuously but with more adding of particles, 1.5 wt. %, they

decrease. In fact, hot extrusion process causes uniform dispersion of particles in the matrix, lowering

porosity, and refinement of grain, thus can improve the yield and ultimate strength. [Ezatpour HR et

al. (2013:23:1262-8)]-[Alizadeh A et al.(sci technol 2011:528:8765-71)]

Hai Su et al. (2012) produced Al 2024 composite reinforced with nano Al2O3 particles by the

help of solid-liquid mixed casting combined with ultrasonic treatment. The author observed the

tensile properties of Al 2024. The better tensile properties were attributed to the uniform distribution

of reinforcement and grain refinement of aluminum matrix. (Fig.8) shows the yield strength, ultimate

tensile strength and elongation of as-cast 2024 alloy and nano-Al2O3/2024 composites. At the

optimal amount of nano-Al2O3 particulates (1 wt.%), the ultimate tensile strength and yield strength

of the composite were enhanced by 37% and 81%, respectively, compared with the alloy matrix.

However, with increasing the mass fraction of nanoparticles, the tensile strength of the composites

decreases. It is also found from (Fig.8) that the elongation decreases gradually with increasing the

mass fraction of nanoparticle.

Fig.8. Tensile properties of as-cast 2024 alloy and nano-Al2O3/2024 composite. [Hai Su et al.

(2012)]



19

Hwa-Jung Kim et al. (2012) worked on wear properties of recently developed Al-Mg-Si-

CoNi alloy by the addition of ball milled CoNi powders. The wear properties of the Al–Mg–Si–CoNi

alloy have been compared to a commercial A6061 (Al–Mg–Si) alloy under dry sliding conditions.

The Al–Mg–Si–CoNi alloys shows better wear properties than the A6061 alloy for all test conditions

in this investigation. (Fig.9) shows the variation of the wear rate with the applied load for Al–Mg–

Si–CoNi and A6061 alloys. The wear rate increases rapidly with the applied load for the A6061

alloy, whereas the wear rate increases smoothly with an applied load up to 300 N for the as-cast and

T6-treated Al–Mg–Si–CoNi alloys.

Fig.9 Variation of wear rate with applied load for Al6061 alloy and the Al-Mg-Si-CoNi alloy. [Hwa-

Jung Kim et al. (2012)]

K.Kalaiselvan et al. (2011) produced Al (6061-T6)/B4C composite and analysed its

mechanical properties. They observed that the hardness (Fig. 10 a) and the tensile strength (Fig. 10

b) of the composite are linearly increasing with increasing weight percentage of the B4C particulate.

Fig 10 (a) Variation of hardness with Fig 10(b) Variation of UTS with B4C content.

B4C content. [K.Kalaiselvan et al. (2011)] [K.Kalaiselvan et al. (2011)]



20

Abhishek Kumar et al. (2013) fabricated A359/ Al2O3 composite by the help of

electromagnetic stir casting technique. The author revealed that the hardness values increased to 72.8

HRC compared to pure alloy (46HRC). Also the tensile strength of the composite increased to

148.7N/mm2 as compared to pure alloy (103.7N/mm2).

Mahboob et al. (2008) has worked on synthesis of Al- Al2O3 composite by mechanical

alloying and evaluate the effect of ball milling on mechanical properties. Author used commercial Al

powders with particle size smaller than 63 μm and nanosized α-alumina powder with 99.5% purity

and average size of about 27-43 nm have been provided. High energy planetary ball mill with

stainless steel balls with different diameters (8.5-10 mm) were employed. Rotary velocity of the mill

and ball to powder weight ratio were 250 rpm and 15, respectively. The aluminum and 5wt%

alumina nano powders were milled at different times, i.e., 0, 4, 8 and 12 hours. Strength and

hardness were increased by increasing of milling time but the elongation was almost constant. Al-

5%wt. Al2O3 composite strength was appreciably increased by 12 hours milling, due to the uniform

dispersion of nano-size alumina particles.

Tavoosi et al. (2009) fabricated Al–Zn/Al2O3 nanocomposites prepared by reactive milling

and hot Pressing technique and evaluate the hardness. Author has taken a mixture of commercial Al

of 99.7% pure and size of particles (50-70 μm) and 15.8% ZnO powders (99.9% pure and size of

particles 250nm) was milled in planetary ball mill in order to produce Al–13.8 wt%Zn/5 vol%Al2O3

nanocomposites. Rotation of planetary ball mill has been carried out at a speed of 600 rpm and a

ball-powder mass ratio of 15:1. It was found after 60 h milling and hot pressing at 500°C under 400

MPa pressure. The result cleared that the hardness value for Al–13.8 wt%Zn/5vol% Al2O3

nanocomposites (relative density about 99.6% and crystallite size about 40 nm) was about 180 HV

and for Al–13.8 wt%Zn (relative density 99.8% and crystallite size of about 40 nm) was about 150

HV. The variation of hardness vs. annealing time at different temperatures showed that the produced

nanocomposites had a good thermal stability at temperatures below 400°C.

Mazahery et al. (2009) worked on fabrication of A356 alloy matrix composite reinforced with

nano- Al2O3 particles by stir casting. The author has revealed that the values of the yield strength

(Fig.11 a), the ultimate tensile strength (Fig.11 b) of the composite increased with the increase in

volume percentage of the nano particles. Also the hardness (Fig.11 c) of the composite improved

compared to pure alloy.

Fig. 11(a) Variation of yield strength with Fig.11 (b) Variation of UTS with Al2O3 content.

Al2O3 content. [Mazahery et al. (2009)] [Mazahery et al. (2009)]



21

Fig.11 (c) Variation of Hardness with Al2O3 content. [Mazahery et al. (2009)]

M. karbalaei Akbari et al. (2014) fabricated Al metal matrix composite (A356 alloy metal

matrix) reinforced with nano-sized aluminum oxide by commercial casting technique and evaluated

wear resistance, hardness, compressive strength. The evaluation of mechanical properties showed

that mechanical properties decrease with increase in porosity content of composite. In his

experimental work nano Al2O3 particles were individually milled with Cu and Al powder and take in

into Al alloy by stir casting technique to fabricate A356/1.5 vol% nano alumina composites.

Hardness, wear resistance and compressive strength enhanced with mixing with nano Al2O3 particles

in A356 as a matrix. The minimum of wear rate and maximum of hardness and compressive strength

were seen in Al2O3-Cu reinforced specimen. Porosity content was the main controller factor, which

affect the mechanical properties of materials manufactured at different stirring time.

M.Hiller et al. (2006) analysed the mechanical properties and compared with that non

reinforcement Al. AA6061 aluminium powder and nano sized powder were mechanically alloyed

with ball milling technique. In his experimental work sub micron scale clusters of aluminum oxide

particles were investigated in the matrix after mechanical alloying. In comparison to the not

reinforced AA6061 the nano metal matrix composite evaluated the mechanical properties: according

to rule of mixture the young’s modulus was increased to 13% (percent) and yield strength is about

31% lower and UTS is almost same.

A.Baradeswarn et al. (2013) worked on Influence of B4C on the tribological and mechanical

properties of Al 7075- B4C composite. Author studied the mechanical behaviour of B4C reinforced

AL-7075 matrix composite and has revealed that the compressive strength (Fig. 12 a), tensile

strength (Fig. 12 b), and the hardness (Fig. 12 c) of the composite increased linearly with increase in

volume percentage of B4C.

(a) (b)

Fig.12 (a) and (b) Variation of compressive strength and tensile strength with B4c content



22

(c)

Fig.12 (c) Variation of hardness with B4c content. [A.Baradeswarn et al. (2013)]

5. MICROSTRUCTURAL PROPERTIES

Micro structural properties play a very important role in the field of engineering and science.

These micro structural observations can be done by some different techniques, such as SEM, XRD,

Optical, TEM, and XRD. Micro structure can be defined as it is the structure of a finished surface or

a thin layer of a material as revealed by microscope above 25× magnification. The microstructure of

a material can be further categorized into polymeric, metallic, ceramic and metallic and can enhance

the physical properties such as Hardness, toughness, strength, corrosion resistance. [American

Society of Metals (1985)]

M.S.Aboraia et al. (2013) Fabricated Al MMC reinforced with nano-sized Al2O3 by

commercial casting. The Uniform dispersion of Al2O3 and Al2O3-ZrO2 in the Al matrix was

confirmed by characterizing these nanocomposites powders by SEM and XRD process. SEM process

was successfully applied on the milled powders to check the uniform dispersion of the reinforcement

particles in the Al matrix. Author analysed the samples at the different milling time. (Fig. 13) shows

the SEM snapshot of Al- Al2O3 particles before milling (0 hours). The author observed the

agglomerated Al2O3 particles. Agglomeration can be removed by increasing the milling time.

Fig.13 SEM images of Al- Al2O3 particles before milling (0 hours) [M.S.Aboraia et al. (2013)]



23

In a work of M.S.Aboraia et al. (2013) (Fig.14 a) shows the SEM images of Al- Al2O3

particles at different milling times for 300 rpm speed. (Fig. 14) shows after 7 hours milling time the

agglomerations of Al2O3 particles are still observed, but smaller in size. (Fig. 14 a) shows flattened

Al particles were formed. (Fig. 14 b) shows after 30 h milling time a change in particles morphology

from flattened to flake. Fragmentation of particles occurred with particle size reduction. Layers of Al

and Al2O3 were obviously observed at this stage and there are alumina clusters surrounded by

aluminum particles as shown in (Fig. 14 b). (Fig. 14 c) shows the resulted microstructure, at this

milling time alumina clusters have been disappeared and distributed homogeneously. Nano size of

alumina particles are covered by Al particles. The author analysed the powder particles which are

shown in (Fig.14 c) is more uniform in size compared to the previous phases of milling.

Fig.14 (a) Flattened Al (b) Fragmented Al2O3 (C) Al particles spitted- Al2O3 cluster

disappeared and homogeneously distributed

Fig.14 SEM images of Al- Al2O3 powders 300 rpm after (a) 7h (b) 30h (c) 45h [M.S.Aboraia et al.

(2013)].

M.S.Aboraia et al. (2013) worked on structure analysis by XRD technique. At the time of

powder milling process the changes in peak shape are related to changes in micro structure. This

technique is used to evaluate the lattice strain and the crystallite size. The XRD patterns of the Al-

Al2O3 powder milled with 300 rpm rotation speed for different periods of time are shown in

(Fig.15). Author has observed that line broadening increases with milling time. Decrease in the

broadening of diffraction peaks and intensity are the strain of the lattice and grain size.

Fig.15 XRD patterns of Al- Al2O3 powder milled for different times 7, 12, 15, 21, 30, 38 and 45 h.

[M.S.Aboraia et al. (2013)]



24

H. Mahboob et al. (2008) used commercial aluminium particles with particle size smaller

than 63 μm and nanosized α-alumina powder with 99.5% pure and average size of about 27-43 nm

have been provided. (Fig.16 a) and (Fig. 16 b) show microstructure of Al and α-Al2O3 particles

captured by SEM and TEM, respectively. Author analysed that the Al particles are irregular and α-

Al2O3 particles.

Fig.16 (a) Aluminium particle Fig.16 (b) α-Al2O3 particle [H. Mahboob

et al. (2008)]

Ruixiao Zheng et al. (2014) investigated the micro structural properties of Al alloy matrix

composite reinforced with Fe – based metallic glass particles (FMG) by SEM and XRD. Powder

morphological evolution and microstructure of the extruded samples were analysed by SEM cam

scan 3400. The morphological characteristics and distribution of particle size of initial powder are

shown in (Fig. 17 a) and (b) for Al-2024 and (Fig.17 c) and (d) for Fe based metallic glass particle.

The initial Al-2024 powders are spherical in shape. The author also shows in (Fig.18) the XRD

pattern of initial powder. Author has been viewed that the Aluminium 2024 alloy powder has sharp

peaks which correspond to the face cantered cubic (FCC) structure.

Fig.17 (a) Fig 17(b)

Fig.17 (a) Morphology and particle size distribution Fig.17 (b) of initial powder for Al-2024.

[Ruixiao Zheng et al. (2014)]



25

Fig 17 (c) Fig.17 (d)

Fig.17 (c) Morphology and particle size distribution Fig.17 (d) of initial powder for FMG.

[Ruixiao Zheng et al. (2014)]

Fig.18 XRD patterns of initial powders. [Ruixiao Zheng et al. (2014)]

In a work of Ruixiao Zheng et al. (2014) shows the morphological characteristics of 24h

milled composite powders. The author shows in (Fig.19 a) particles are changed from spherical to

Flaky but the size of powders is almost same. (Fig. 19 b) exhibits the cross sectional morphology

characteristics of powders. It can be examined that after milling the size of Fe based metallic glass

particles is less than 5 μm and homogeneous dispersion in the Al alloy matrix. Author also shows in

(Fig. 20) XRD patterns of mixed powders and mechanical alloyed powder. These patterns show that

mech. alloying causes the peak broadening and intensity reduction with increasing in milling time.



26

Fig.19 (a) Fig.19 (b)

Fig. 19 (a) SEM morphology of 24h milled Fig.19 (b) cross section morphology of powder

Composite powder. [Ruixiao Zheng et al. (2014)]

Fig.20 XRD patterns of 24h milled powder composite. [Ruixiao Zheng et al. (2014)]

Hamid Reza Ezatpour et al. (2013) worked on Al 6061- nano composite reinforced with

alumina particles by stir casting. Author investigated the micro structural property of nano composite

by scanning electron microscopy. (Fig. 21 a) SEM snapshots of nano Al2O3 powder are shown and

completely analysed that the big cluster are formed in raw alumina nano particles. When nano

alumina powder is added into melt it is very difficult to break the cluster by mechanical stirrer. (Fig.

21 b) shows SEM snapshots of Al/ Al2O3 composite powder After 6h milling. Author examined that

Al2O3 nano particles are uniformly dispersed into the soft Al particles and clusters are effectively

broken.



27

Fig. 21(a) Fig. 21(b)

Fig.21 (a) SEM images of nano Al2O3 powders, and (b) Al/ Al2O3 powders after 6h ball milling time.

[Hamid Reza Ezatpour et al. (2013)]

6. CONCLUSION

The above review on various processing techniques, mechanical, and micro structural

properties of Al based MMCs reinforced with ball milled nano particles leads to the following

conclusions.

❖ Ball milling process can be successfully applied for converting the reinforced particles into

nano particles and enhance the base material in terms of damping properties, mechanical

strength, and wear resistance by dispersing the ball milled nano particles homogeneously.

❖ From the various processing techniques which are discussed in this paper the Stir casting is

one of the most economical techniques of processing Al MMCs. The major advantages of stir

casting process are its applicability to mass production, easier control of matrix structure,

simplicity and good matrix-particle bonding.

❖ Uniform distribution of Al2O3 nano particle improves the tensile properties.

❖ The aluminum and 5wt% alumina nano powders were milled at different times. Strength and

hardness were increased by increasing of milling time but the elongation was almost constant.

❖ In Al Metal matrix reinforced with alumina, SiC, B4C etc. particle Improves the tensile

strength, hardness and yield strength

❖ SEM process was successfully applied on the milled powders to check the uniform dispersion

of the reinforcement particles in the Al matrix. Increase in milling time alumina clusters have

been disappeared and distributed homogeneously.

7. REFERENCES

1. G.R. Nagpal, khanna book publication co.LTD. “Material science”. ISBN-81-87522 55-0.

2. Dandekar CR, Shin ye. “Effect of porosity on the interface behaviour of an Al2O3 aluminum

composite a molecular dynamics study”. Compos Sci Technol 2011; 71:350-6.

3. Degarmo E.P, BLACK J.T., “Material and processes in manufacturing”. ISBN-81-203-

12430.



28

4. Himanshu kala, K.K.S. Mer, sandeep Kumar. “A Review on Mechanical and Tribological

Behaviours of Stir Cast Aluminum Matrix Composites”. ICMPC 2014, 1951 – 1960.

5. Kriedar K.G., “Metal Matrix Composite”. Academic press Inc, N, USA.

6. Zhang, Z.; Chen, D.L. “Contribution of Orowan strengthening effect in particulate-reinforced

metal matrix nanocomposites”. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 483–484, 148–152.

7. Zhang, Z.; Chen, D.L. “Consideration of Orowan strengthening effect in particulate-

reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites”. A model for predicting their yield strength. Scripta

Mater. 2006, 54, 1321–1326.

8. S. RAY, “M.Tech. Dissertation” (Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, 1969).

9. Hamid Reza Ezatpour, Seyed Abolkarim sajjadi, Mohsen Haddad Sabzevar, Yizhong Huang,

“Investigation of micro structure and mechanical properties of Al6061-nano composite

fabricated by stir casting.” Material and design 55(2014) 921-928.

10. Abhishek Kumar, Shyam Lal, Sudhir Kumar, 2013, “Fabrication and characterization of

A359/Al2O3 metal matrix composite using electromagnetic stir casting method”, J. Mater.

Res. Technol.; 2(3):250–254.

11. FLEMINGS M C. “Behaviour of metal alloys in the semisolid state”, [j]. Metallurgical

Transactions, 1991, 22A: 957−981.

12. R.S. Rana, Rajesh Purohit, S.Das, “Review of recent studies in Al matrix composites” IJSER

(2012), ISSN 229-5518.

13. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (M. P. Groover2002) “fundamental of modern manufacturing 2/e”.

14. Florez-Zamora,M.l.(2008), “comparative study of Al-Ni-Mo alloys obtained by mechanical

alloying in different ball mills.” Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 18: 301.

15. Ruixiao Zheng, Han Yang, Tong Liu, Kei Ameyama, Chaoli Ma, “Microstructure and

mechanical properties of Al alloy matrix composites reinforced with Fe-based metallic glass

particles”, Materials and design 53 (2014) 512-518.

16. Hai su, Wenli Gao, Zheng Lu, “Processing, microstructure and tensile properties of nano

sized alumina particle (Al2O3) reinforced Al matrix composites”. Materials and design 36

(2012) 590-596.

17. Hwa-Jung Kim, Jung- Moo Lee, Young-Hee Cho, Si-Young Sung, Beom-Suck Han, Yong-

Sik Ahn “ Microstructures and wear properties of Al-Mg-Si alloy with the addition of ball-

milled CoNi powders”. Materials Characterization 70 (2012) 137-144.

18. K.Kalaiselvan, N. Murugan, Siva Parameswaran, “Production and characterization of

AA6061–B4C stir cast composite”. Materials and Design 32 (2011), 4004–4009.

19. Mahboob, H., Sajjadi, S. A., and Zebarjad, S. M. “Synthesis of Al-Al2O3 Nano-Composite by

Mechanical Alloying and Evaluation of the Effect of Ball Milling Time on the Microstructure

and Mechanical Properties”. The International Conference on MEMS and Nanotechnology,

ICMN'08 13-15 May, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.

20. Tavoosi, M., Karimzadeh, F., Enayati, M.H., Heidarpour, A. “Bulk Al–Zn/Al2O3

nanocomposite prepared by reactive milling and hot pressing methods”, Journal of Alloys

and Compounds 475, (2009), pp.198–201.

21. Mazahery, H. Abdizadeh, H.R. Baharvandi, “Development of high- performance A356/nano-

Al2O3 composites, Materials Science and Engineering A 518 (2009), 61–64.

22. M. Karbalaei Akbari, H.R. Baharvandi, O. Mirzaee. “Nano-sized aluminum oxide reinforced

commercial casting A356 alloy matrix: Evaluation of hardness, wear resistance and

compressive strength focusing on particle distribution in aluminum matrix”, Composites: Part

B 52 (2013) 262–268.

23. M. Hiller, J. Vlcek. “Synthesis and characterisation of nano-Al2O3 Reinforced

AA6061”.ICAS 2006.



29

24. A.Baradeswarn, A.Elaya Perumal. “Influence of B4C on tribological and mechanical

properties of Al 7075- B4C composites”. Composite part b: engineering vol.54 (2013) 146-

152.

25. American Society of Metals handbook, Nitin edition, V.g, “Metallurgy and Microstructure”.

ASM, metal park OH, (1985), p.12.

26. M.S.Aboraia, G. A. Abdalla, and H. S. Wasly. “Synthesis and Characterization of Al–

Al2O3and Al/ (Al2O3-Zro2) Nanocomposites Using High-Energy Milling” ISSN: 2248-9622,

Issue 6, Nov-Dec 2013, pp.1654-1663.

27. Manjunatha L.H., P.Dinesh, “Development and Study on Microstructure, Hardness and Wear

Properties of as Cast, Heat Treated And Extruded Cnt- Reinforced With 6061al Metal Matrix

Composites” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering & Technology (IJMET),

Volume 3, Issue 3, 2012, pp. 583 - 598, ISSN Print: 0976 – 6340, ISSN Online: 0976 – 6359.

28. Amarnath.G and K.V. Sharma, “Microstructure and Tribological Properties of

Nanoparticulate Wc/Al Metal Matrix Composites” International Journal of Mechanical

Engineering & Technology (IJMET), Volume 4, Issue 2, 2013, pp. 178 - 188, ISSN Print:

0976 – 6340, ISSN Online: 0976 – 6359.

29. Sangram J. Patil, D. P. Patil, A. P. Shrotri and V P. Patil, “A Review on Effect of Addition of

Nano Particles on Tribological Properties of Lubricants” International Journal of Mechanical

Engineering & Technology (IJMET), Volume 5, Issue 11, 2014, pp. 120 - 129, ISSN Print:

0976 – 6340, ISSN Online: 0976 – 6359.

30. K.R. Padmavathi and Dr.R. Ramakrishnan, “Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite with Dual

Reinforcement” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering & Technology (IJMET),

Volume 5, Issue 5, 2014, pp. 151 - 156, ISSN Print: 0976 – 6340, ISSN Online: 0976 – 6359.

Documents

ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL AND MICRO STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR …€¦ · Analysis of Mechanical and Micro Structural Behaviour of Al Based Metal Matrix Composite Reinforced with Ball Milled