39
Dangerous Goods Instructors Symposium 2013 50 Shades of UN Packaging Paul Rankin Reusable Industrial Packaging Association Howard Skolnik Skolnik Industries, Inc.

An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Dangerous Goods Instructors Symposium

2013

50 Shades of UN Packaging

Paul RankinReusable Industrial Packaging Association

Howard SkolnikSkolnik Industries, Inc.

Page 2: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

50 Shades of UN Packaging

An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging.

Page 3: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

DGIS 2013

RIPAReusable IndustrialPackaging Association

Washington, DC

Skolnik IndustriesIndustrial Packaging

for Critical Contents

Chicago, IL

Page 4: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

From unregulated DG movements to Spec Packaging to POPS

1905 – BOE – ICC – DOT – RSPA/PHMSA

Page 5: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

A Brief History of HazMat Regulation in the U.S.

From Specification Packaging to Performance Oriented Packaging

Page 6: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Hazardous materials packagings have been regulated in the U.S. by both governmental and private organizations since the early 1900s.

First by the Bureau of Explosives (BOE); later by the Interstate Commerce Commission; then DOT (1967)

Page 7: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

In 1974, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act consolidated all DOT regulatory authority in the Materials Transportation Bureau.

In 1977 RSPA was formed.

Today, hazmat regulations are controlled by PHMSAs Office of HazMat Safety

Page 8: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

BOE and ICC loosely regulated hazmat packaging (avoid leakage).

By 1967, regulatory controls over packaging expanded and “specification” packaging was created.

Page 9: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Specification packaging was rigid and, at times, almost funny.

DOT 15 box (group 2 hazmats)only made from:› Southern yellow pine› Hemlock› NC pine› Douglas Fir› Larch

Page 10: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Spec packaging testing rules were rather stringent:› Tests 3 times per year› Test samples retained (one year)› Drop (4 ft.)› Hydro (20 p.s.i. for 5 minutes)› Leakproofness (15 p.s.i. water or soap over

seams)

Page 11: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Closure requirements existed, but only for shippers.

Sample closure requirement (1985)178.116-8 Closures(a) Adequate to prevent leakage;

gaskets required.(b) Closing part (plug, cap, plate,

etc.,) must be made of metal as thick as prescribed for head of container….

Page 12: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

December 1990.  

At that point, the packaging world as we knew it was turned on its

head

Page 13: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Test Criteria

CFR49, Part 171.1

Applicability of Hazardous Material Regulations (HMR) to persons and

functions.

Page 14: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Federal hazardous materials transportation law directs the Secretary of Transportation to establish regulations for the safe and secure transportation of hazardous materials in commerce…

Page 15: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

The Secretary is authorized to apply these regulations to persons who transport hazardous materials in

commerce….to persons who cause hazardous materials to be

transported in commerce...

Page 16: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

…and to persons who manufacture or maintain packaging of a component of packaging that is represented, marked, certified or sold as qualified for use in transportation of hazardous material in commerce.

Page 17: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Who is Regulated?

HM Producers HM Packaging Manufacturers HM Shippers Anyone who may participate in other

related transport over public right-of-way.

Page 18: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

What is regulated?

Steel Drums Plastic Drums IBC’s Pails All packagings designed to transport

HM

Page 19: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Regulating Agencies

National Governments (e.g. DOT; TDG) United Nations (Global

Recommendations) IATA and ICAO (air) IMDG (Water) RID (Rail) ADR ( Road)

Page 20: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

United Nations TestingUS DOT Acting Competent Authority

Page 21: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Performing UN Testing

Skolnik manufactures about 150 different packagings that are UN certified.

DOT requires packaging designs to be recertified every 12 months.

Skolnik is a self certifier and does its own testing.

Page 22: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Over to Skolnik…..

Taking you into our Test Lab and focusing on set up and performance of an individual UN Design Type Test.

Page 23: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Introduction to Testing

Page 24: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Tools and Equipment

Page 25: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Bead and Chime

Page 26: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Adding Weightfor the Solid Drop Test

Page 27: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Open Head Closure Ring

Page 28: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Open Head Stack Test

Page 29: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Open Head Hydrostatic Test

Page 30: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Open Head Drop Test

Page 31: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Open Head Leakproof Test

Page 32: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Pass!

All test criteria have been met successfully.

Page 33: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Inconsistencies

LOGSA at Tobyhanna Policing Actions

Page 34: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

LOGSA› Huge percentage of failures for all

packaging design types› No failure analysis› No subsequent action (except a few fines)› Publish results on web; no explanation› Alternative Design Validation Testing – not

useful› Does not reflect field performance

Page 35: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

What’s Ahead…..

Tobyhanna moved from policing to research

Tobyhanna test results available on line at DOT.gov

Page 36: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

Knock Knock…..

What to do when the DOT calls!

1. Always anticipate an inspection

2. Run a self audit once per quarter

3. Keep copies of all necessary DOT records (e.g. employee training) in one location. Be sure another person knows where the records are kept.

Page 37: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

4. Be sure employees can answer basic questions DOT might ask (e.g. have you been trained in this job function).

5. Accompany the DOT inspector as he conducts the inspection. Record key actions on paper.

6. Get the inspectors name.

Page 38: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

7. Keep exit briefing form(s).

8. Fix all noted problems.

9. Call your lawyer.

Page 39: An insightful examination of the tangled relationship between dangerous goods regulations and compliant packaging

DGIS ROCKS!

Thank you! Did you learn something new?

Questions?Comments?Stories to share?