18
Safety in design: An Australian Offshore Petroleum regulatory perspective Jeremy Dunster GM Investigations & Strategic Services AOG Conference & Exhibition February 2013

An Australian Offshore Petroleum regulatory perspective · Safety in design: An Australian Offshore Petroleum regulatory perspective . ... for Safety Critical Element (SCE) selection

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Safety in design: An Australian Offshore Petroleum regulatory perspective

Jeremy Dunster GM Investigations & Strategic Services AOG Conference & Exhibition February 2013

Regulatory functions

A280510 February 2013

Compliance Monitor

and Enforce

Investigate

Improvement Promote Advise

Governance Co-operate Report

2

NOPSEMA’s coverage

• Operations – Offshore petroleum operations – Offshore greenhouse gas storage operations

• Scope – Occupational health and safety at facilities – Structural integrity of facilities and wells – Environmental management of petroleum activities

3 A280510 February 2013

NOPSEMA’s jurisdiction

4 A280510 February 2013

NOPSEMA

Relevant State/NT Minister

or NOPSEMA where powers conferred

Legislation administered by NOPSEMA

5 A280510

Commonwealth Attorney-General’s website: comlaw.gov.au

Safety Regulations

Commonwealth Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006

Schedule 3 – OHS law

Wells Regulations

Environment Regulations

February 2013

Legal framework (OHS)

• A ‘General Duties’ regime

• Performance-based, but with prescriptive elements

• An independent Regulator (NOPSEMA)

• A facility operators safety case is used as a permissioning document, i.e. must be accepted in order to undertake activities.

6 A280510 February 2013

Safety case life-cycle

7 A280510 February 2013

Agree Scope of Validation

(SoV) Validation Statement

Validation

8 A280510 February 2013

Scope of Validation

• Overview of facility/ modification & process for Safety Critical Element (SCE) selection

• Codes & standards for each SCE

• Validator selection process

• Appropriateness of codes and standards

• Deliverables

Validation Statement

• Codes and standards are appropriate

• If codes and standards are applied the facility will incorporate measures to protect Health & Safety

• Consistency with Formal Safety Assessment Ag

reed

by

NO

PSEM

A

Safe

ty C

ase

Deci

sion

-mak

ing

Valid

atio

n

The Safety Case

9 A280510 February 2013

Safety Case Submission

Safety case contents

10 A280510 February 2013

Safety ManagementSystem Description

Formal SafetyAssessment Description

FacilityDescription

Monitor, Audit and Review

Description ofTechnical Controls

including:

Emergencies

Activities andOperating Parameters

General Description (the layout of the facility)

Machineryand Equipment

Safety Measures

HAZID

Risk Assessment

Emergencies (EERA, FERA)

Performance Standards

Description ofProcedural Controls

including:

Identification ofControl Measures

Implementation and Improvement of the SMS

Scope (Activities)

OHS Risk Management

Maintenance

Communication

Emergencies

Safety Measures

Corrective & Preventative action

Implemented& Functional?

Implemented& Functional?

Comprehensiveand Integrated

HAZID

Risk Assessment

Emergencies (EERA, FERA)

Identification ofControl Measures

Identification ofControl Measures

(Necessary to reduce thelevel of risk to ALARP)

Reasonable Practicability

11 A280510 February 2013

Cost to avert Risk

ALARP

12 A280510 February 2013

High Risk

Low Risk

Concept

Design

Construct, Install, Operate, Modify, Decommission

Early engagement

13 A280510 February 2013

Early Engagement

Timing

14 A280510 February 2013

FID

Concept Selected

Concept Evaluation

Conceptual Design

FEED

Detailed Design

Overseas Construction

Field Construct & Install

Production

Cost to change

Field activities

Window of opportunity

Future directions

• Design notification style scheme: – Focus on concept selection & design – Required for production facilities – Basis for ongoing dialog, transitioning into submission of a

safety case

15 A280510 February 2013

Industry leadership challenge

• Shaping and supporting an organisational culture which embraces and values inherent safety to effectively manage risk, by: – Early application; – Minimising hazards at their source; – Designing out hazards in preference to designing in

control measure complexity; – Ensuring systems fail safe when things go wrong.

16 A280510 February 2013

Questions?