45
An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton, Rick Herd, Vishesh Maskey, Jim Stiles, Julie Svetlik, and Paul Ziemkiewicz Presentation for the 2008 PA AMR and Coal Mining Heritage Conference, State College, PA

An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for

Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios

Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton, Rick Herd, Vishesh Maskey,

Jim Stiles, Julie Svetlik, and Paul Ziemkiewicz

Presentation for the 2008 PA AMR and Coal Mining Heritage Conference, State College, PA

Page 2: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 3: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Project Goal

• Restore sustainable fisheries in the majority of WV stream miles lost to historic, pre-law coal mining.

• 2,775 AMD impaired stream miles

• 114 10 digit HUCs

Page 4: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Objectives

1. Assist the WVDEP in developing a strategic, watershed-based approach to efficiently determine acid mine drainage (AMD) restoration needs

2. Develop restoration plans that maximize statewide recovery of cold- and warm-water fisheries

3. Assess the outcome (ecological and economic) of this effort

Page 5: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Stream Data•Water Chemistry•Temperature•Instream Habitat•Biological communities•Ecosystem processes

GIS-based Watershed Model

Watershed Restoration Master Plan

• 5 year plan• Priority implementation sequence• Expected costs and fisheries benefits• General guidance regarding reclamation

project designs

Landscape Data•Land Cover•Geology•Drainage Networks•Mine Data•Expected Development•Mine pool elevations

Monitoring & Assessment• Assess progress towards implementing

the master plan

Fishery / Ecological Priorities•Priorities to maximize recovery of coldwater and warmwater fisheries (EcoUnits).

•Reach scale and subwatershed (10-12 digit HUC) scale priorities.

•Points to stream segments where recovered fisheries are possible, and if recovered, would be highly valuable.

Reclamation Priorities•Action-by-action priorities needed to recover fisheries priorities.

• Implementation of at-source, in situ, and instream reclamation actions.

•Maximize cost:benefit efficiency.

Reclamation Design• Detailed engineering design of priority

reclamation projects

Project Implementation• Construction of priority reclamation

projects

Stakeholder Input

Page 6: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Need

• Integrate various chemical and ecological modeling components

• Spatial data

• Reproducible

• Standardize

• Visually illustrate remediation alternative outcomes

Page 7: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Chemical costs for AMD treatment

Page 8: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

WV

Str

ea

m C

on

diti

on

In

de

x

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

ReferenceModerate MiningIntensive Mining

WVSCI = 52.3 * exp (-0.504 x PC1)R2 = 0.804d.f. = 33

PC 1pH (-0.856)Alkalinity (-0.685)

Conductivity (0.851)Acidity (0.706)Hardness (0.684)Sulfates (0.862)Aluminum (0.934)Chromium (0.661)Iron (0.890)Manganese (0.893)Nickel (0.910)

Ecological Condition Models (bugs)

f (PC1 (80%), CVPC1 (9%))

Page 9: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21

Expected Species Richness

Obs

erve

d Sp

ecie

s R

ichn

ess

Good WQ / Low Mine Intensity Region

Good WQ / High Mine Intensity Region

Bad WQ / High Mine Intensity Region

Ecological Condition Models (Fishes)

f (basin area (80%), spatial position (8%))

Page 10: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Spatial AnalysisSpatial Analysis

• Location plays an important role in watershed management

• Spatial analysis quantifies relationships between locations

• Geographic Information Systems (GIS) aids in the analysis

Page 11: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Decision Support SystemDecision Support System

• An interactive, computer-based system designed to support a user or group of users in achieving a higher effectiveness of decision making

• Functions: – explore solutions by building alternatives – allow user interaction and input– provide for flexible data and analysis capabilities

(Jankowski, 1995)

Page 12: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Questions to Address:Questions to Address:

• What are average and low flows for non-gauged streams and unsampled sites?

• What are water quality conditions downstream of sampling?

• Where should abatement activities be focused?

Page 13: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Mass balance water quality prediction

• Mass balance

5

“Smart” accumulator

9

3

1

6Note:

Sampled

Modeled

5

11

3

1

8

Page 14: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Segment-level watersheds

Outlet

Page 15: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 16: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 17: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 18: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 19: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 20: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 21: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 22: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 23: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Select study area

Page 24: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 25: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 26: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 27: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 28: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 29: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

Mass balance water quality prediction

• Mass balance

5

“Smart” accumulator

9

3

1

6Note:

Sampled

Modeled

5

11

3

1

8

Page 30: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 31: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 32: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 33: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

WV Stream Condition Index

Page 34: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 35: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 36: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 37: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 38: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 39: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 40: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 41: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 42: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 43: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 44: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,
Page 45: An Application of a Hydrologically Networked Watershed Model for Evaluating AMD Treatment Scenarios Mike Strager, Todd Petty, Brady Gutta, Jennifer Fulton,

SummarySummary

• Spatial decision support system allows integration of components

• Hydrologically networked watersheds linked for “smart” mass balance model

• A tool for repeatable, transferable, standardized information for watershed management