27
AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYM IN READING PARAGRAPH AT HARVARD ENGLISH COURSE PARE-KEDIRI THESIS By: CALTIRA ROSIANA 06360002 ENGLISH DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG 2011 AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYM IN READING PARAGRAPH AT HARVARD ENGLISH COURSE

AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYM

IN READING PARAGRAPH AT HARVARD ENGLISH COURSE

PARE-KEDIRI

THESIS

By:

CALTIRA ROSIANA

06360002

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG

2011

AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYM

IN READING PARAGRAPH AT HARVARD ENGLISH COURSE

Page 2: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

PARE-KEDIRI

THESIS

This thesis is submitted to meet one of the requirements to achieve

Sarjana Degree in English Department

By:

CALTIRA ROSIANA

06360002

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG

2011

Page 3: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

This thesis written by Caltira Rosiana was approved on April 25, 2011

Advisor I Advisor II

(Dr. Sri Hartiningsih, M.M) (Drs. Mas’udi,

M.Ed)

This thesis was defended in front of the examiners of Faculty of Teacher

Training of Education of the University of Muhammadiyah Malang

and accepted as one of requirement achieve

Sarjana Degree in English Education

on April 29, 2011

Page 4: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

Approved by:

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Dean,

Drs. H. Fauzan, M.Pd

Examiners: Signatures:

1. Dr. Masduki, M. Pd 1………………………..

2. Rina Wahyu S, S. Pd 2………………………..

3. Dr. Sri Hartiningsih, M.M 3.....................................

4. Drs. Mas’udi, M.Ed 4.....................................

Page 5: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all, I would like to thanks to Allah SWT. I also expresses my

deepest thank to the first advisor Dr. Sri Hartingsih, M.M and the second advisor

Drs. Mas’udi, M.Ed for their advice, motivation and ideas in guiding my thesis

until finish. My gratitude also goes to all lectures of English Department of

University Muhammadiyah of Malang (UMM) for knowledge’s. This gratitude

also given to English teacher at Harvard English Course at Pare-Keiri and

Director of Harvard English Course Mujiono S.Pd who had given me permission

to conduct this research.

I dedicated my deepest love and sincere to my mother, father, and my

brother who give me support and prayers so that this thesis can be completed.

To all my friends John Pantau,Ana Ndut, Dodon, all member of “Black

Box Comuity Malang”, all member of “Ikatan Keluarga Mahasiswa Riau at

Malang”, and the members of “Macan gank” thanks for your help and support.

And for all my friends who cannot be mentioned one by one, thank you very

much.

Malang, April 25,

2011

Caltira Rosiana

Page 6: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

TABLE OF CONTENT

Approval ................................................................................................. i

Legalization ............................................................................................ ii

Motto ..................................................................................................... iii

Dedication .............................................................................................. iii

Abstract .................................................................................................. iv

Acknowledgement .................................................................................. v

The List of Tables ................................................................................... vi

The List of Tables ................................................................................... vii

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study ........................................................... 1

1.2 Statement of the Problems ......................................................... 3

1.3 Purpose of the Study .................................................................. 3

1.4 Significance of the Study .......................................................... 4

1.5 Scope and limitation ................................................................. 4

1.6 Definition of the Key Terms ...................................................... 4

CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 2.1 General View of Ability ........................................................... 6

2.1.1 Kind of Ability ................................................................... 8

2.2 Reading ..................................................................................... 8

2.2.1 Definition of Reading ......................................................... 8

2.2.2 The Purpose of Reading ...................................................... 9

2.2.3 Types of Reading ................................................................. 11

2.2.3.1 Argumentative Text ................................................. 11

2.2.3.2 Descriptive text ......................................................... 11

2.2.3.3 Narrative Text ........................................................... 12

2.2.3.4 Expository Text ......................................................... 12

2.2.4 How to Understand Reading ............................................... 12

2.2.4.1 Survey ........................................................................ 13

2.2.4.2 Ask Question ............................................................. 13

2.2.4.3 Read Effectively ......................................................... 14

2.2.4.4 Recall .......................................................................... 14

2.2.4.5 Review ........................................................................ 14

2.3 Synonym .................................................................................. 15

2.3.1 Definition of Synonym ........................................................ 15

2.3.2 Type of Synonym ................................................................ 16

2.3.2 Function of Synonym .......................................................... 17

CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Page 7: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

3.1 Research Design ......................................................................... 18

3.2 The Population and Sample ......................................................... 18

3.2.1 Population ............................................................................. 18

3.2.2 Sample .................................................................................. 19

3.3 The Research Instrument ............................................................. 20

3.3.1 Test .................................................................................... 20

3.3.2 Validity of the Test ............................................................ 21

3.3.3 Reability of the Test ............................................................ 21

3.3.4 Analysis of the Test ............................................................ 22

3.3.4.1 Index of Difficulty ..................................................... 22

3.3.4.2 Index Discrimination .................................................. 23

3.4 Data Collection ........................................................................... 25

3.5 The Technique of Analysis Data ................................................. 25

CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Research Finding ...................................................................... 29

4.1.1 Students’ Ability ............................................................... 32

4.2 Discussion .................................................................................. 40

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

5.1 Conclusion ............................................................................... 42

5.2 Suggestion ................................................................................. 43

5.2.1 Suggestion for the Students .............................................. 43

5.2.2 Suggestion for the Teacher ............................................... 43

REFERENCES

APPENDIXES

Page 8: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

APPENDIX I

The Recapitulation of Students’ Score in Answering Synonym Test

N

O

NAME CORRECT ANSWER SCORE

Verb Noun Adjective Ver

b

Noun Adjective

1 Student 1 6 8 5 60 80 50

2 Student 2 5 7 8 50 70 80

3 Student 3 3 4 5 30 40 50

4 Student 4 6 7 6 60 70 60

5 Student 5 6 5 7 60 50 70

6 Student 6 4 2 3 40 20 30

7 Student 7 5 7 6 50 70 60

8 Student 8 4 1 4 40 10 40

9 Student 9 8 8 9 80 80 90

10 Student 10 5 4 3 50 40 30

11 Student 11 5 6 6 50 60 60

12 Student 12 7 6 4 70 60 40

13 Student 13 5 7 7 50 70 70

14 Student 14 6 5 5 60 50 50

15 Student 15 4 4 7 40 40 70

16 Student 16 7 7 5 70 70 50

17 Student 17 7 9 8 70 90 80

18 Student 18 4 5 5 40 50 50

19 Student 19 3 4 2 20 40 20

20 Student 20 7 8 7 70 80 70

21 Student 21 6 7 4 60 70 40

22 Student 22 4 5 6 40 50 60

23 Student 23 2 3 3 20 30 30

24 Student 24 5 2 3 50 20 30

25 Student 25 4 4 7 40 40 70

26 Student 26 1 2 2 10 20 20

27 Student 27 7 7 4 70 70 40

28 Student 28 5 1 3 50 10 30

29 Student 29 4 5 4 40 50 40

30 Student 30 6 7 7 60 70 70

TOTAL 1510 1570 1550

Page 9: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

APPENDIX II

Table I the Students Score In Answering Synonym of Verb

NO NAME N R SCORE LEVEL

1 Student 1 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

2 Student 2 10 5 50 Poor

3 Student 3 10 3 30 Very Poor

4 Student 4 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

5 Student 5 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

6 Student 6 10 4 40 Poor

7 Student 7 10 5 50 Fair

8 Student 8 10 4 40 Poor

9 Student 9 10 8 80 Very Good

10 Student 10 10 5 50 Poor

11 Student 11 10 5 50 Poor

12 Student 12 10 7 70 Good

13 Student 13 10 5 50 Poor

14 Student 14 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

15 Student 15 10 4 40 Poor

16 Student 16 10 7 70 Good

17 Student 17 10 7 70 Good

18 Student 18 10 4 40 Poor

19 Student 19 10 3 30 Very Poor

20 Student 20 10 7 70 Good

21 Student 21 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

22 Student 22 10 4 40 Poor

23 Student 23 10 2 20 Very Poor

24 Student 24 10 5 50 Poor

25 Student 25 10 4 40 Poor

26 Student 26 10 1 10 Very Poor

27 Student 27 10 7 70 Good

28 Student 28 10 5 50 Poor

29 Student 29 10 4 40 Poor

30 Student 30 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

TOTAL 1510

Page 10: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

APPENDIX III

Table II the Students Score In Answering Synonym of Noun

NO NAME N R SCORE LEVEL

1 Student 1 10 8 80 Very Good

2 Student 2 10 7 70 Good

3 Student 3 10 4 40 Poor

4 Student 4 10 7 70 Good

5 Student 5 10 5 50 Poor

6 Student 6 10 2 20 Very Poor

7 Student 7 10 7 70 Good

8 Student 8 10 1 10 Very Poor

9 Student 9 10 8 80 Very Good

10 Student 10 10 4 40 Poor

11 Student 11 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

12 Student 12 10 6 60 Fairly Good

13 Student 13 10 7 70 Good

14 Student 14 10 5 50 Poor

15 Student 15 10 4 40 Poor

16 Student 16 10 7 70 Good

17 Student 17 10 9 90 Excellent

18 Student 18 10 5 50 Poor

19 Student 19 10 4 40 Poor

20 Student 20 10 8 80 Very Good

21 Student 21 10 7 70 Good

NO NAME N R SCORE LEVEL

22 Student 22 10 5 50 Poor

23 Student 23 10 3 30 Very Poor

24 Student 24 10 2 20 Very Poor

25 Student 25 10 4 40 Poor

26 Student 26 10 2 20 Very Poor

27 Student 27 10 7 70 Good

28 Student 28 10 1 10 Very Poor

29 Student 29 10 5 50 Poor

30 Student 30 10 7 70 Good

TOTAL 1570

Page 11: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

APPENDIX IV

Table III the Students Score In Answering Synonym of Adjective

NO NAME N R SCORE LEVEL

1 Student 1 10 5 50 Poor

2 Student 2 10 8 80 Very Good

3 Student 3 10 5 50 Poor

4 Student 4 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

5 Student 5 10 7 70 Good

6 Student 6 10 3 30 Very Poor

7 Student 7 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

8 Student 8 10 4 40 Poor

9 Student 9 10 9 90 Excellent

10 Student 10 10 3 30 Very Poor

11 Student 11 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

12 Student 12 10 4 40 Poor

13 Student 13 10 7 70 Good

14 Student 14 10 5 50 Poor

15 Student 15 10 7 70 Good

16 Student 16 10 5 50 Poor

17 Student 17 10 8 80 Very Good

18 Student 18 10 5 50 Poor

19 Student 19 10 2 20 Very Poor

20 Student 20 10 7 70 Good

21 Student 21 10 5 50 Poor

NO NAME N R SCORE LEVEL

22 Student 22 10 6 60 Extremely Fair

23 Student 23 10 3 30 Very Poor

24 Student 24 10 3 30 Very Poor

25 Student 25 10 7 70 Good

26 Student 26 10 2 20 Very Poor

27 Student 27 10 4 40 Poor

28 Student 28 10 3 30 Very Poor

29 Student 29 10 4 40 Poor

30 Student 30 10 7 70 Good

TOTAL 1550

Page 12: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

APPENDIX V

The Score of Try Out

N

O

RESPONDENTS CORRECT ANSWER SCORE

Verb Noun Adjective Ver

b

Noun Adjective

1 Student 1 5 7 6 50 70 60

2 Student 2 6 6 7 60 60 70

3 Student 3 4 4 4 40 40 40

4 Student 4 7 6 5 70 60 50

5 Student 5 7 5 6 70 50 60

6 Student 6 3 3 4 30 30 40

7 Student 7 6 6 7 60 60 70

8 Student 8 5 3 5 50 30 50

9 Student 9 7 5 8 70 50 80

10 Student 10 6 5 3 60 50 30

11 Student 11 4 5 5 40 50 50

12 Student 12 7 7 5 70 70 50

13 Student 13 6 6 6 60 60 60

14 Student 14 5 6 4 50 60 40

15 Student 15 3 5 6 30 50 60

16 Student 16 6 6 5 60 60 50

17 Student 17 8 8 9 80 80 90

18 Student 18 5 6 4 50 60 40

19 Student 19 3 5 6 30 50 60

20 Student 20 6 6 5 60 60 50

21 Student 21 7 5 3 70 50 30

NO NAME CORRECT ANSWER SCORE

Verb Noun Adjective Ver

b

Noun Adjective

22 Student 22 3 6 7 30 60 70

23 Student 23 3 4 4 30 40 40

24 Student 24 4 4 3 40 40 30

25 Student 25 3 5 6 60 50 30

26 Student 26 3 3 3 30 30 30

27 Student 27 6 6 3 60 60 30

28 Student 28 4 3 5 40 30 50

29 Student 29 3 5 5 30 50 50

30 Student 30 7 6 8 70 60 80

TOTAL 1500 1550 1530

Page 13: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

APPENDIX VI

The Result of the Try out Test

Number of

Test Items

Correct

Answer

Incorrect

Answer

Unanswered FV Percentage Remark

1 16 14 0,53 53 Accepted

2 18 11 1 0,60 60 Accepted

3 10 20 0,33 33 Accepted

4 16 14 0,53 53 Accepted

5 17 12 1 0,57 57 Accepted

6 12 18 0,40 40 Accepted

7 15 15 50 50 Accepted

8 12 18 0,40 40 Accepted

9 18 12 0,60 60 Accepted

10 13 16 1 0,43 43 Accepted

11 9 19 2 0,3 30 Accepted

12 14 16 0,46 46 Accepted

13 15 15 0,50 0,50 Accepted

14 17 13 0,57 57 Accepted

15 20 10 0,66 66 Accepted

16 11 19 0,36 0,36 Accepted

17 18 12 0,60 60 Accepted

18 14 16 0,46 46 Accepted

19 13 17 0,43 43 Accepted

20 11 18 1 0,36 36 Accepted

21 20 10 0,66 66 Accepted

22 9 20 1 0,3 30 Accepted

23 11 19 0,36 36 Accepted

24 10 20 0,33 33 Accepted

25 19 10 1 0,63 63 Accepted

Page 14: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

26 15 15 0,50 50 Accepted

27 16 14 0.53 53 Accepted

28 17 13 0,57 57 Accepted

29 12 16 2 0,40 40 Accepted

30 17 13 0,57 57 Accepted

Page 15: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

APPENDIX VIII

INDEKS DIFFICULTY OF THE TEST STUDENTS NUMBER OF THE TEST SCORE

NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TEST

1. 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 63

2. 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 66

3. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 40

4. 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 63

5. 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 60

6. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 30

7. 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 60

8. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 16

9. 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 83

10. 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 40

11. 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 56

12. 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 56

13. 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 63

14. 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 53

15. 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 50

16. 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 63

17. 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 80

18. 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 46

19. 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 26

20. 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 73

21. 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 56

22. 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 50

23. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 26

24. 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 33

25. 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 50

26. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 16

27. 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 60

28. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 30

29. 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 43

30. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 66

Righ

answer

22 14 10 13 8 16 7 17 13 13 10 19 16 19 8 7 12 15 19 11 25 26 8 24 22 23 11 28 21 22

Total of

students

30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Indeks

difficulty

(p)

0,7

0

0,5

0

0,3

0

0,4

0

0,2

0

0,5

0

0,2

0

0,7

0

0,4

0

0,4

0

0,3

0

0,6

0

0,5

0

0,6

0

0,2

0

0,2

0

0,4

0

0,5

0

0,6

0

0,3

0

0,8

0

0,9

0

0,3

0

0,8

0

0,7

0

0,8

0

0,4

0

0,9

0

0,7

0

0,7

0

interpretatio

n

To ea

sy

avera

ge

avera

ge

avera

ge

To

o d

ifficult

avera

ge

To

o d

ifficult

To ea

sy

avera

ge

avera

ge

avera

ge

To

o d

ifficult

avera

ge

To

o d

ifficult

To

o d

ifficult

To

o d

ifficult

avera

ge

avera

ge

avera

ge

avera

ge

To ea

sy

To ea

sy

avera

ge

To ea

sy

To ea

sy

To ea

sy

avera

ge

To ea

sy

To ea

sy

To ea

sy

Page 16: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

APPENDIX IX

INDEKS DIFFICULTY OF THE TRY OUT STUDENTS NUMBER OF THE TEST SCORE

NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TEST

1. 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 60

2. 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 63

3. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 40

4. 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 60

5. 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 60

6. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 33

7. 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 63

8. 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 43

9. 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 66

10. 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 46

11. 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 46

12. 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 63

13. 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 60

14. 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 50

15. 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 46

16. 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 56

17. 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 83

18. 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 50

19. 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 46

20. 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 56

21. 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 50

22. 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 53

23. 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 36

24. 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 36

25. 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 46

26. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 30

27. 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50

28. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 40

29. 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 43

30. 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 70

Right

answer 25 16 17 16 10 16 12 10 19 20 13 16 9 12 22 8 17 14 20 16 10 8 29 11 7 9 26 12 8 28

Total of the

student

30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Index

difficulty

(p)

0,8

3

0,5

3

0,5

6

0,5

0

0,3

0

0,5

0

0,4

0

0,3

0

0,6

0

0,7

0

0,4

0

0,5

0

0,3

0

0,4

0

0,7

0

0,3

0

0,6

0

0,5

0

0,7

0

0,5

0

0,3

0

0,3

0

0,1

0

0,4

0

0,2

0

0,3

0

0,9

0

0,4

0

0,3

0

0,9

0

interpretation

To

ea

sy

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

To

o

diffic

ult

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

To

ea

sy

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

To

ea

sy

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

To

ea

sy

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

To

o

diffic

ult

av

erag

e

To

o

diffic

ult

av

erag

e

To

ea

sy

av

erag

e

av

erag

e

To

ea

sy

Page 17: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

APENDIX XI

INDEKS DISKRIMINASI OF THE TRY OUT

STUDENTS NUMBER OF THE TEST SCORE

NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TEST

17. 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 83

30. 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 70

9. 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 66

2. 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 63

7. 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 63

12. 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 63

1. 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 60

4. 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 60

5. 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 60

13. 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 60

16. 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 56

20. 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 56

22. 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 53

14. 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 50

18. 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 50

21. 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 50

27. 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50

10. 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 46

11. 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 46

15. 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 46

19. 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 46

25. 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 46

29. 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 43

8. 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 43

3. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 40

28. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 40

6. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 33

23. 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 36

24. 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 46

26. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 30

High Group (JA)

STUDENTS NUMBER OF THE TEST SCORE

NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TEST

17 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 83

1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 70

9 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 66

2 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 63

7 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 63

12 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 63

1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 60

4 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 60

5 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 60

Right answer 9 5 7 9 5 8 6 3 5 7 7 7 4 5 8 5 8 5 8 6 6 3 9 4 3 2 7 4 1 8

high group 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

(PA)

1,0

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

1,0

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

0,7

0

0,3

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

0,9

0

0,9

0

0,4

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

0,7

0

0,7

0

0,3

0

1,0

0

0,4

0

0,3

0

0,2

0

0,9

0

0,4

0

0,1

0

0,9

0

Page 18: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

Lower Group (JB)

STUDENTS NUMBER OF THE TEST SCORE

NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TEST

25 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 46

29 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 43

8 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 43

3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 40

28 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 40

6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 33

23 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 36

24 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 36

26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 30

Right answer 6 7 2 1 0 4 1 2 7 6 4 0 0 2 6 1 6 2 6 5 1 1 8 3 1 2 9 2 3 8

Lower group 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

(PB)

0,7

0

0,9

0

0,2

0

0,1

0

0,0

0

0,4

0

0,1

0

0,2

0

0,9

0

0,7

0

0,4

0

0,0

0

0,8

0

0,2

0

0,7

0

0,1

0

0,7

0

0,2

0

0,7

0

0,5

0

0,1

0

0,1

0

0,9

0

0,3

0

0,1

0

0,2

0

1,0

0

0,2

0

0,3

0

0,9

0

Index Discrimination test (D) STUDENTS NUMBER OF THE TEST SCORE

NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TEST

(PA) 1,0

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

1,0

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

0,7

0

0,3

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

0,9

0

0,9

0

0,4

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

0,7

0

0,7

0

0,3

0

1,0

0

0,4

0

0,3

0

0,2

0

0,9

0

0,4

0

0,1

0

0,9

0

(PB)

0,7

0

0,9

0

0,2

0

0,1

0

0,0

0

0,4

0

0,1

0

0,2

0

0,9

0

0,7

0

0,4

0

0,0

0

0,8

0

0,2

0

0,7

0

0,1

0

0,7

0

0,2

0

0,7

0

0,5

0

0,1

0

0,1

0

0,9

0

0,3

0

0,1

0

0,2

0

1,0

0

0,2

0

0,3

0

0,9

0

D

0,3

0

-0,4

0

0,7

0

0,9

0

0,5

0

0,5

0

0,6

0

0,1

0

-0,4

0

0,2

0

0,5

0

0,9

0

-0,4

0

0,3

0

0,2

0

0,4

0

0,2

0

0,3

0

0,2

0

0,2

0

0,6

0

0,2

0

0,1

0

0,1

0

0,2

0

0,0

0

-0,1

0

0,2

0

-0,2

0

0,0

0

interpretation

satisfa

ctory

very

poor

excellen

t

excellen

t

go

od

go

od

go

od

poo

r

very

poor

satisfa

ctory

go

od

excellen

t

very

poor

satisfa

ctory

satisfa

ctory

go

od

satisfa

ctory

satisfa

ctory

satisfa

ctory

satisfa

ctory

go

od

satisfa

ctory

poo

r

poo

r

satisfa

ctory

poo

r

very

poor

satisfa

ctory

satisfa

ctory

poo

r

Page 19: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

APPENDIX XII

THE TEST

Test : Synonym

Subject : English Subject

The Numbers of Items : 30 items

Time : 45 Minutes

Class : Reading Class

General Direction:

1. Read the direction of each paragraph and the test carefully.

2. Do the easier items before doing the most difficult ones.

3. The answers are written in answer sheet.

4. For each items there is only one appropriate answer.

1. Read paragraph carefully and pay attention to underlined words.

Based on paragraph, find the synonym of words given bellow the

paragraph.

Ryan could not stand live in the orphanage. So, he run away and

joins a group of homeless people. Little Yudhy lived in poverty and poor

health. No one took care of him and no one live him. In order to survive,

he becomes a beggar and a scavenger roaming the streets of Jakarta. Often

his fellow scavenger would pick on him and hit for no reason at all. As

Page 20: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

little Yudhy given up, he become vicious and mean. Being uneducated

made him feel inferior, he never dared to be with a girls. The felt most as

easy a young scavenger who were still innocent and in experienced, and

on them he vented his frustrations while at the same time satisfying his

desires.

1. The word join synonym with?

a. separate

b. participated

c. dark

d. guard

2. What is the synonym of little in the sentence two of the

paragraph?

a. child

b. old

c. choose

d. many

3. The synonym of lived in the paragraph is….

a. nome

b. building

c. free

d. stay

4. What is the synonym of poverty in the sentence is…

a. poor

b. wealthy

c. rich

d. need

5. The synonym of to survive in the sentence is….

a. kept

b. to live

c. to exist

d. to show up

6. The word uneducated synonym with?

Page 21: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

a. misunderstand

ing

b. skilled

c. unskilled

d. free

7. The similar meaning of inferior in the sentence

a. superior

b. minority

c. decide

d. determine

8. The word young synonym with?

a. baby

b. old

c. sister

d. decide

9. What is the synonym of innocent in the sentence nine?

a. corrupt

b. guilty

c. sinless

d. pure

10. The similar of desire in the last sentence of paragraph is?

a. hate

b. willing

c. essential

d. bas

2. Read the whole text to grasp the meaning and then fill in the blanks

by finding out the synonym of words in the brackets

Andre was 11. …(lazy)… boy. He never studied at night. His 12

… (parents)… advised him to 13. …(study)…, but he didn’t 14 …

(listen)… to his parents’ advice.

Page 22: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

One day his English teacher was writing some 15… (exercises)…

on the blackboard. The teachers ask the way how to put the sentence in to

the “passive forms”. Unfortunately, Andre didn’t 16. …(know)… how to

put them into passive forms. 17. …(Slowl)y…., he 18 … (began) … to

open the note book and he was caught by the teacher during the test. The

19. …(teacher)… gives him 20. …(severe)… punishment.

III. Read the Paragraph above carefully.

Match the synonyms of word taken from paragraph in column A with

the word in column B

In an undisturbed forest, white tailed deer feed on plants of various

kinds. Whole and mountain lions prey on the deer. When deer are

numerous, their enemies become numerous too, enemies stay in balance

with one another. The man enters the scene. He looks on animals such as

wolves and mountain lions harmful. He kills as many as possible. When

the animals the feed on deer are killed, the deer multiply, without check.

Soon the large deer population has eaten nearly all the plants available for

food. Then the deer begin to starve.

Page 23: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

Column A

21----- forest

22 ----- numerous

23. ----- enemies

24. ---- Stay

25. ----- scene

26. ----- looks

27. ----- harmful

28. ----- large

29. ----- begin

30. ----- starve

Column B

a. dangerous

b. see

c. big

d. start

e. pray

f. jungle

g. hungry

h. live

i. many

j. view

Page 24: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

24

APPENDIX XIV

Synonym Items

Synonyms Items on Try Out

Synonym of Noun = 1, 4, 5, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27, 29, 30

Synonym of Verb = 3, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 24, 25, 27

Synonym of Adjective = 2, 6, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23

Synonyms Items on Test

Synonym of Noun = 1, 4, 7, 10, 12, 15, 19, 21, 23, 25

Synonym of Verb = 3, 5, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 26, 29

Synonym of Adjective = 2, 6, 8, 9, 11, 17, 22, 27, 28, 30

Page 25: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

25

REFERENCE

Adelstein, Michaele and Pival, Jean A. 1978. The Reading Commitment. United

States Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Andreson, David R., Sweeney, Denis J. and Williams, Thomas A. 1992. Statistic

Concepts and Applications. New York- Los Angles: West Publishing

Company.

Ary, Donal. 2002. Introduction to Research in Education. United States of Africa:

Wadsworth- Thomson Learning.

Budiman, Arief and Agustian, Chandra, 2004. Kamus Sinonim Antonim Inggris

Indonesia, Bandung: Pustaka Grafika.

Boediono and Koster, Wayan. 2002. Teori dan Aplikasi Statiska dan Probabilitas

Sederaha, Lugas dan Mudah Dimengerti. Bandung: PT. Remaja

Rosdakarya Bandung.

Boey, Lim Kiat. 1975. An Introduction To Linguistics For The Language Teacher.

Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Buku Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Malang Tahun Ajaran

2010/2011. 2011. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Davies, Florence. 1996. Introducing Reading: Penguin English.

Dubin, Fraida and Olshtain, Elite. 1987. Reading on Purpose. United States:

Addison-Weseley Publishing Company.

Furcan, Arief. 1982. Pengantar Penelitian Dalam Pendidikan. Surabaya: Usaha

Nasional.

Greene, Kenyon B. De. 1972. System Psychology. United States: Mc Graw Hill Book

Company.

http://ezinearticles.com/?5-Effective-Ways-To-Understand-What-You-Read---Adult-

Learner---Part-3-Of-4&id=656766

James, Amy. 2006. First Grade Success. United States: Jossey Bass.

Page 26: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

26

Kirn, Elaine and Hartmann, Pamela, 1990. Interactions I – A reading Skills Book.

Singapore: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

Lambert, Wallance E. 1982. Language, Psychology, and Culture. California:

Stanford University Press.

Lefevre, Carl A. 1994. Linguistics and the Teaching Of Reading. London: Mc Grow

Hill.

Lougheed, Lin. 1988. Reading In Focusing an Advanced Reader for Academic

Purposes. Washington, D.C: English Language Program Division Bureau

of Educational and Culture Affairs United States Information Agency.

Mikeley, Beatroce S. and Jeffries, Linda, 1998. Power Reading: Logman.

Napa, Pieter A.1997. Vocabulary Development Skills: Kanisius.

Nurkancana, Wayan and Sumartana. 1982. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Surabaya: Usaha

Nasional.

Panitia Pengembangan Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan

Bahasa. 1975. Pedoman Umum Pembentukan Istilah. Jakarta: Departemen

Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Jakarta.

Samsuri, 1987.Analisis Bahasa Memahami Bahasa Secara Ilmiah. .Jakarta: Erlangga.

Steinberg, Danny D, Nagata, Hiroshi and Aline, David P. 2000. Psycholingustic:

Language, Mind and World.

Suharsimi, Arikunto. 1995. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi

Aksara.

Sudijono, Anas. 2004. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.

Surapranata, Sumarna. 2004. Analisis, Validitas, Reabilitas dan Interpretasi Hasil

Tes Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT. Remaja Posdakarya.

Tarigan, H.G. 1984. Pengajaran Kosa Kata. Bandung: Angkasa Bandung.

Trench, Richard Chenevix. 2009. On the Study of Words. United Stated:Prentice Hall.

W, Jhon H. 1996. The meaning in Reading. United Stated:Mc: Grow Hill.

Page 27: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY ON ENGLISH SYNONYMeprints.umm.ac.id/30950/2/jiptummpp-gdl-s1-2011... · pare-kediri thesis by: caltira rosiana 06360002 english department faculty

27

Wishon, George E. and Burks, Julia M. 1980. Let’s Write English Revised Edition.

New York: American Book Company.