Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
American Tower
Corporation
2015 Investor Day December 10, 2015
Forward-Looking Statements
“Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This
presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning our goals, beliefs, strategies,
future operating results and underlying assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from
those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors,
including those described at the end of this presentation, Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2014, as updated in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2015, under the caption “Risk Factors” and other filings we make with the SEC. We undertake
no obligation to update the information contained in this presentation to reflect subsequently
occurring events or circumstances. Definitions are provided at the end of the presentation and
reconciliations to GAAP measures are available on our website at www.americantower.com.
2
Event Agenda
3
Lunch and Introduction with Jim Taiclet, CEO
Presentation and Q&A - India
12:00pm-1:00pm
1:00pm-1:45pm
Coffee Break 1:45pm-2:00pm
Presentation and Q&A – Latin America 2:00pm-2:45pm
Presentation and Q&A - EMEA 2:45pm-3:30pm
Coffee Break 3:30pm-3:45pm
Presentation and Q&A – U.S. 3:45pm-4:30pm
Closing Remarks with Tom Bartlett, CFO 4:30pm-5:00pm
Cocktail Reception in Lobby Lounge 5:00pm-6:30pm
American Tower Corporation 2015 Investor Day Introduction
Jim Taiclet, CEO
Our Growth Thesis is Predicated on Three Key Themes
5
› The Global Mobile
Revolution is in Full
Swing and Will
Continue for a
Number of Years to
Come
1 2 3
› Our Current
Quantitative Analysis
Suggests Macro
Towers Represent
the Best Opportunity
to Generate
Compelling Returns
› International Markets
Will Grow Faster
than the U.S., for a
Longer Period of
Time
Theme 1: The Global Mobile Revolution
6
United States
International Markets
› Total mobile data usage growing at ~50%
per year
› Average monthly mobile plan usage of
~3GB for smartphone users
› The internet of things is just scratching the
surface
› 5G is coming!
30%
57%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
U.S. Smartphone Penetration
› Most consumers are still on 2G/3G
networks
› Increasingly affordable smartphones are
only now penetrating the market
› Demand for mobile technology just as
strong as in the U.S., if not higher
› 4G is coming!
<5%
16%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
International Smartphone Penetration(1)
(1) Reflects average of Brazil, Mexico, India and Nigeria, weighted based on population size.
95% of the World’s Population Resides Outside of the U.S. and Has a Growing Thirst for Mobile
Sources: AV&Co. analysis & research, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, eMarketer, GSMA Intelligence
Theme 2: Macro Towers Remain the Focus of our Business
7
Best Source for Signal
Transmission in Most Areas
Macro Towers Offer the Best Opportunities
Preferred by Carriers
Proven Collocation
Opportunities
Limited Technology Risk
Minimal Maintenance Capex
Higher Expected Returns
Theme 2a: We Are Selectively Investing in Macro Tower
Supplements
8
Can we make the collocation model work?
What are the upfront and
ongoing capital costs?
What is the technology
risk?
Can we earn a sufficiently
attractive risk-adjusted return?
All Investment Decisions With Respect to Macro Supplements Are Predicated on Expected Returns
Theme 3: International Operations will Lengthen and
Strengthen our Growth Profile
9
› ~60% of revenue from
investment grade tenants
› Long-tenured, non-
cancellable contracts
› CPI-linked escalators in
most markets
› Carrier profitability
encourages incremental
investment
› Most markets 5-10 years
behind the U.S. in terms
of wireless technology
› Predominantly 2G or 3G
› Extremely limited fixed
line infrastructure
› Networks not dense
enough to support
3G/4G
› Predominantly young,
upwardly mobile
populations
› Emerging middle classes
interested in mobile
connectivity
› Rising incomes aligning
with decreasing handset
prices
Networks
Today Networks in
5-10 Yrs
Sources: AV&Co. analysis & research
Strong Customer Base Less Mature Networks Favorable Demographics
Attain Attractive Levels of Scale
Our Strategic Planning Framework
10
• Focus on high-quality, well-located assets worldwide
• Emphasize location, structural quality and lease-up potential
• Utilize expanded asset base to build mutually beneficial relationships with carriers
Drive Superior Operational Execution to
Expand Margins
• Hire the best people at all levels of the organization
• Optimize processes and procedures and build best-in-class systems
• Focus on driving highest possible margin flow-through of organic revenue growth
Maintain a Strong Financial
Position to Support
Inorganic Growth
• Prudent financial policies to support investment grade rating
• Substantial liquidity to support capital deployment
• Disciplined asset evaluation processes
All Decisions Are Made to Create Long Term Shareholder Value
We Have Built a Leading Global Business(1)
11 (1) As of September 30, 2015.
(2) Excludes DAS networks. Pro forma for Viom transaction. Tower count as of 9/30/15 of over 99,000.
~140,000 Towers(2)
~3,300 Global Employees
13 Countries
With a Focused Commitment to:
› Asset Quality
› Partnering with Multi-National, High Quality Counterparties
› Geographical Diversification
› Creating Diverse Mix of Legacy and Newer Assets to Drive Growth
We Have Hired the Best People Worldwide and
Empowered Them
12
World-Class Executive Team With Proven Track Record of Success
14 Years with AMT Executive Vice President,
International Operations &
President, Latin America
& EMEA
8 Years with AMT Executive Vice President
& President, U.S. Tower
Division
8 Years with AMT Executive Vice President
& President, Asia
Hal Hess Amit Sharma Steven Marshall
Constant Focus on Continuous Improvement at All Levels in Organization
Ed DiSanto Tom Bartlett
6 Years with AMT Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
8 Years with AMT Executive Vice President,
Chief Administrative
Officer, General Counsel
and Secretary
We Continue our Focus on Prudent Capital Deployment
13
Consistent, Proven Process
Extensive Standardized Market Evaluation
• Focus on large, free market democracies with stable macro
environments
• Seek large, growing wireless markets with multiple well-capitalized
and competitive carriers
Risk-Adjusted Return Hurdles for All Investments Account for:
• FX, inflation, country and counterparty risk
• Asset-specific considerations
10 Year DCF Model Used for All Investment Evaluations
• Extensive set of assumptions developed over 15 years
• Every investment compared against stock repurchase program
• Models include PPP Adjustments to compensate for long-term
international FX risk
We Have Maintained an Investment-Grade Balance Sheet
14
Balance Sheet Strength has Been a Key Component of our Expansion Initiatives
Prudent Leverage Range Solid Liquidity Laddered Maturities
Increasing Local Currency Borrowing
4.8%
3.4%
2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15
4.4
5.6
2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15
Cost of Debt(1) Average Maturity
(Years)
› Investment grade rated
since 2009
› Approximately $2 billion
of available liquidity
› Target Leverage
continues to be 3-5x(2)
(1)
(1) 3Q15 pro forma for the impact of amendment agreements effective October 28, 2015, which extended the maturity dates of the 2013 Credit Facility, the 2014 Credit
Facility and the Term Loan to June 28, 2019, January 29, 2021 and January 29, 2021, respectively.
(2) Net leverage as of Q3 2015 was 5.4x, and we are targeting ~5x net leverage on a last quarter annualized basis by Q4 2016.
Down ~140 basis points Up ~1.2 years
Key Considerations
15
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
(1) Pro forma for Viom transaction. Tower count as of 9/30/15 of over 99,000.
We are Now Positioned to Build on our Track Record
› Unmatched Global Portfolio of
~140,000 towers(1)
› Exceptional Worldwide Talent Pool
› Solid Balance Sheet and
Significant Liquidity
› Significant Tower Capacity to Meet
Tenancy Demand
› Long-tenured, Mutually Beneficial
Partnerships with Premier Global
Carriers
› Global Acquisition Platform
Current Positioning Expected Results
We Expect Global Growth in Mobile to Fuel Exciting Growth for AMT
› Continued Solid Growth in
Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and
AFFO per Share
› Material Increase in Global
Tenancy Through Organic Growth
› Significant Expansion of Existing
Asset ROIC, Led by International
Markets
› Continued Evaluation of Inorganic
Growth Opportunities
› Compelling Dividend Growth and
Total Stockholder Returns
Thank you
We Will now Begin Our Regional
Presentations with India
India Strategic Overview
Amit Sharma, President, Asia
Attractive Macro
Backdrop
The Foundations of Our Investments in India
18
• Legacy British rule of law
• Solid property rights
• One of the largest economies in the world
Rapidly Growing Wireless Markets
• Multiple carriers investing in networks with recent and expected future spectrum auctions
• World’s second largest telecom market, in early stages of development
• Total mobile services market revenue expected to reach $37B by 2017
Partnerships with Large,
Well-Funded Carriers
• Bharti, Vodafone, Idea, Tata and others
• Well positioned to capture significant market share in greenfield Reliance-Jio launch
The Indian Market Satisfies Our Requirements for Capital Deployment
India Socioeconomic Trends
19
› World’s second largest
population, with nearly
1.3 billion people
› Median age of Indians
today is ~26 years
› 130 million moved above
poverty line between
2001-2011
› ~40% of population has at
least basic handsets
today(1)
Large Population with Increasing Economic
Mobility
Data-Hungry
Demographic
Large Economy with Strong
Expected Growth
› Minimal fixed line
penetration means only
option for social apps,
texting, etc. is mobile
› Mobile app usage is
growing by 100%+, driven
mostly by young people
› ~12% of population have
smartphones today;
~26% projected to have
smartphones by 2019(1)
› Seventh largest economy in
the world
› Expected to be third-largest
by 2030
› IMF expects GDP growth of
over 7% annually through at
least 2020
› Significant emphasis on
modernization driven by
technological innovation
› Digital India initiative
expected to help drive
growth in wireless sector
India is Poised to Modernize its Economy and Social Structure
Sources: AV&Co. analysis & research, Pew Research, July 2015, GFK, August 2015, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, August 2015, BofA Merrill Lynch Global
Research, Cisco VNI 201
(1) Estimated based on current mobile penetration and current/future smartphone penetration, adjusting for average number of SIM cards per person (~1.84). Sources: AV&Co.
analysis & research, BAS-ML Global Research, Cisco VNI 2014 (India), The Broadband Commission for Digital Development- The State of Broadband 2015
India Technology Trends
20
Low Current Smartphone Penetration Rapidly Falling Smartphone Prices(1)
Recent Spectrum Auctions Provide Critical Bandwidth Exponential Projected Mobile Data Usage Growth
90%
74% 74% 70% 70% 70%
55% 50%
43% 35%
30% 25%
20%
1.1
13.7
2014 2019E
Total Data Traffic (in petabytes)
149
1,262
2014 2019E
Mobile Data per User (in megabytes)
Sources: Cisco VNI 2014, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, Jana.com: Smartphone trends in India, Jan15, IDC, Strategy Analytics Group
› $17B in proceeds. 900 MHz spectrum ideal
for efficient 3G and 4G deployments
› Major carriers are well-positioned to deploy
new spectrum assets
› R-Jio greenfield launch has generated
significant demand
› Incumbents need to invest & compete to
maintain market share, particularly 4G
244 254
223
174
138 132 127 123 120
6 11 21
50
82
107 126
145
161
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E
ASP of smartphone (US$) Smartphone shipments (mn) - RHS
(1) ASP = Average Selling Price.
Our India Presence (Pro Forma for Viom)
Diverse, Nationwide Footprint of ~57,000 Towers(1)
VIOM
Legacy AMT
(1) As of 9/30/15, pro forma for Viom transaction.
› A leading independent tower company in
India
› Strategically positioned for incremental
tenancy opportunities with urban-centric
portfolio
› Expect to facilitate extensive 3G/4G
network deployments for major carriers in
the market
› Average tenancy of ~2.2 tenants per tower
› Opportunity to achieve significant revenue
growth by meeting network needs of
incumbents
Portfolio Highlights
21
AMT’s History in India
Enter market through 175-
site build-to-suit agreement
Market Entry Follows Years of Due Diligence
Acquire ~2k towers from
Transcend and XCEL
Acquire ~4.6k towers from
Essar
Reach 10k tower mark
through active BTS program
Announce ~42k site Viom
Transaction
2008
2009
2010
2015
2012
High Quality
Partners
High Quality
Towers
Experienced
Local
Management
Teams
Operational and
Service
Excellence
22
India Leadership
23
• EVP and President,
Asia
• 8 Years with
American Tower
• Extensive
Background in
Global Telecom,
including at Motorola
Amit Sharma
• Chief Operating Officer Ashwani
Khillan
• Chief Financial Officer Vijay Agarwal
• Chief Sales Officer Sudhir
Agarwal
• VP, Business Development Nitin
Doddihal
Experienced Leadership Team Focused on Operational Excellence
23
$15
$145
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
Revenue (in USD millions)(2)
Pass-through
revenue
24
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
Operating Profit (in USD millions)
~2.6k
~15k
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
Tower Count
Up Nearly 6X
Strong Organic Growth Complemented by New Builds and Acquisitions
2009 2015 2009 2015 2009 2015
45% Tenant Revenue
CAGR 82% CAGR
India Operating Results(1)
$22
$246 Tenant
revenue
$3
$92
(1) 2015 data reflects Q3 2015 ending tower count and annualized Q3 2015 revenue and operating profit.
(2) Solid bar represents tenant revenue and dotted bar represents pass-through revenue contribution.
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
Aircel 10%
Reliance-Jio
10%
Vodafone 15%
Bharti Airtel 19%
Idea 32%
Other 14%
Aircel 8%
Bharti Airtel 9%
Uninor 9%
Vodafone 12%
Idea 14%
Tata 30%
Other 18%
India Revenue Overview(1)
Revenue by Tenant(1) Signed New Business by Customer(2)
Majority of Revenues and New Business Are from Large, Incumbent Wireless Carriers
(1) Reflects Q3 2015 AMT India operating results, pro forma for Q2 2015 Viom operating results.
(2) Reflects collocation and amendment activity for first nine months of 2015. Excludes BTS revenues.
25
India Growth History(1)(2)
(1) 2014 and 2015 Organic Core Growth excludes the impact of pass-through revenues.
(2) 2015 Organic Core Growth is year-to-date organic core growth as of the quarter ended September 30, 2015.
(3) For sites constructed in 2010 and earlier.
(4) Includes Viom transaction announced on October 21, 2015. Transaction expected to close in mid-2016.
Organic Growth
New Build Program
Acquisitions(4)
All Investments Evaluated Using Risk Adjusted, DCF-Based Analysis
1,602 1,257
1,548 ~2,000
2012 2013 2014 2015E
New Builds per Year
› Driven primarily by new
business from large, well-
funded tenants
› With increased rollout of
3G/4G, Organic Core
Growth has accelerated
over last twelve months
2012 2013 2014 2015E
Organic Core Growth
Average of over 9%
› Day 1 returns of 10%+
› Tenancy on legacy new build
portfolio of ~2 tenants(3)
› Most builds for large carriers
like Airtel and Vodafone
› >80% of pro forma portfolio
composed of acquired sites
› Acquired portfolios have
typically performed at or
above initial expectations
~6,600
~42,600
Pre-2010 2010-2014 YTD 2015
Acquired Sites per Year
-
26
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
Key Transaction – Essar
27
2.2 2.2
2.3
2013 2014 2015
Tenancy Per Tower
3,100
3,250
3,400
2013 2014 2015
Tenant Revenue(2)
(INR in millions)
› ~4,600 towers in August 2010 for
~$430 million
› ~1.9 tenants per tower on day
one
› Day 1 gross margin % of ~75%(1)
› Tenancy of 2.3 tenants per tower
› Gross margin % of ~85%(1)
› NOI Yield of ~11%
Transaction Overview Current Operating Performance
9% 10%
11%
2013 2014 2015
NOI Yield(3)
(1) Excludes pass-through
(2) 2015 based on annualizing results from the quarter ended 9/30/15. All years exclude straight-line revenue.
(3) 2015 based on Q3 2015 annualized data. NOI yield reflects local currency. Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
Proven History of Driving Increasing Yields on Acquired Portfolios
India New Build Program – Overview(1)
28
1.7 1.9
2.0
2013 2014 2015
Average Tenancy
14%
18% 21%
2013 2014 2015
NOI Yield(2)
550 610
670
2013 2014 2015
Average Annual Tenant Revenue per Tower(2)
(INR in thousands)
Operating Highlights for 2010 and Prior New Builds
› Key driver of growth in India, with favorable economics
› More than half of current portfolio comprised of AMT builds
› Current average construction cost between $25k-$30k USD
› Day 1 Returns of 10%+, much higher with additional tenants
› Anchor tenants are typically large incumbent carriers
New Build Program Highlights
(1) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15.
(2) 2015 based on Q3 2015 annualized data. All periods exclude straight-line revenue. NOI yield reflects local currency.
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
India New Build Program – Overview
29
› Innovative products with reduced time to market - NPP (Non-Penetrating Pole) reduced
to 3 from 7 days, QBS (Quick Build Solution) reduced to 18 days from 40 days
› Lighter towers to bring in cost optimization – NBT (Narrow Base Tower), reduces capex
up to 12-15% of overall site cost
› Implementation of Standard Quality Assurance & Quality Control processes, ensuring
quality construction
› Provision of Fiber ducts – to support OFC requirement of Carriers for 3G/4G. Results in
additional revenue & marketability of towers
New Build Program Highlights
QBS – Steel Foundation 6.0m NPP with Camouflage Camouflaged GBM GBM with Street Lights
Abbreviations: QBS = Quick Build Solution NPP = Non-penetrating Pole GBM = Ground Based Mast OFC = Optical Fiber Cable
American Tower’s Competitive Advantage in India
Presence
› Leading, well-positioned
independent portfolio in
India(1)
› Proven history of driving
lease-up on both
constructed and acquired
sites
› Significant presence in
urban areas seeing more
activity due to 3G/4G
rollouts and coverage gaps
› Able to leverage portfolio
and existing relationships
with key tenants
› Veteran leadership team in
place from day one
› Strong regional organization
of nearly 450 employees
› Will be focused on
seamlessly integrating Viom
portfolio once transaction is
closed
› Expect to decrease SG&A
as % of revenue after
closing Viom transaction
9% 8% 8% 9%
2012 2013 2014 YTD 2015
SG&A as % of Revenue(2)
› Industry-leading systems and
processes developed over 15
years of international
operations
› Efficient site uptime
performance makes portfolio
more attractive for collocation
› Focus on renewable energy
helped us move ~4,500
towers to zero diesel mode
› Mobile based workforce
management for efficiency in
operations and billing
99.7% 99.8%
99.8%
99.9%
2012 2013 2014 YTD 2015
Site Uptime %(2)
(1) Pro forma for pending Viom transaction.
(2) Figures represent annual averages except for 2015 which is YTD 2015.
Metros
A Circle
Locations
Rural and
Suburban
30
People Operational Efficiency
Key Opportunities
1 Viom Assets are Well-Positioned to Drive Revenue Growth and Yield
Operating Synergies
Capitalize on Carrier Network Investments as Multi-Year Deployments
of 3G and 4G accelerate
Evaluate Macro Supplements (WiFi, DAS, Small cells, limited
backhaul)
We Are Focused on Generating Recurring, Long-Term Growth in India
31
Evaluate Other Potential Opportunities in Asia
2
3
4
India Q&A
India Appendix
Supplementary India Data(1)
Country
Years
Operating
in Market
Avg
Tenancy
Avg Years in
AMT
Portfolio
% of AMT
Rental
Revenue
# of Towers # of DAS
Systems
India 8 1.9 4.7 years 5.1% 14,618 25
Country
3 Yr Avg
Organic
Core
Growth
Consolidated
ROIC(2)
India 9.0% 8.2%
(1) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15.
(2) Based on year-to-date annualized figures as of 9/30/15. 34
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
India Tower Vintage Analysis(1)(2)
(1) Reflects average years in AMT portfolio, as of 9/30/15. Vintage reflects years in AMT portfolio.
(2) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15.
(3) 2015 based on Q3 2015 annualized data and. NOI yield reflects local currency.
(4) Younger vintage have highest NOI yield due to highest proportion of built sites, which have a lower initial investment than acquired sites.
2.2 2.0
1.5
>5 years 3-5 years <3 years
Tenancy
12%
22%
17%
>5 years 3-5 years <3 years
NOI Yield(3)(4)
750
613
443
>5 years 3-5 years <3 years
Tenant Revenue per Tower Ex Straight-line(3)
(INR ‘000)
50%
17%
33%
>5 Years 3-5 Years <3 Years
% of Portfolio By Ownership Length
35 Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
LatAm Strategic Overview
Hal Hess, EVP and President, Latin America and EMEA
Olivier Puech, CEO Latin America
Attractive Macro
Backdrop
The Foundations of Our Investments in LatAm
37
• Legacy European rules of law
• Solid property rights throughout footprint
• Large, growing economies
Competitive Wireless Markets
• Multiple carriers investing in networks
• Recent and future spectrum auctions
• Significant growth in mobile data usage and smartphones
Partnerships with Large,
Multinational Carriers
• AT&T, Telefónica, América Móvil, Telecom Italia and others
Our Latin American Markets Fit our Comprehensive Investment Evaluation Methodology
LatAm Socioeconomic Trends(1)
38
› Middle class population of
~200 million
› Significant portion under
the age of 40
› More than half use social
media
› Data consumption among
this demographic
increasingly driven by
video
Young, Increasingly Connected Middle Class
Increasing Focus on
Digitalization
Solid Economic Outlook
Despite Near Term
Headwinds
› Digitalization in LatAm
has generated nearly 1
million jobs and 4.3% to
regional GDP
› Even so, more than 40%
of people in region still
don’t have internet
access
› Local governments
implementing numerous
digitalization programs
› Near term economic
volatility expected to ease
over time
› FX trends currently ~2-3
standard deviations
outside historical range
Latin America Is Positioned for Strong Long-Term Growth
Sources: Brookings Institute, February 2015, GSMA intelligence, May 2015, Development Bank of Latin America, July 2015, Kharas, OCED, 2010 , GSMA Mobile
Economy, Latin America 2014, WEO IMP, April 2015, IMF World Economic Outlook.
3.8% 3.6%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Projected GDP Growth (2)
(1) Reflects AMT’s Latin American markets.
(2) Reflects average of AMT’s Latin American markets, on a constant price basis.
LatAm Technology Trends
39
Mix of Connections Rapidly Shifting to 3G/4G(1)
Rapidly Falling Smartphone Prices(2)
Mobile Data Traffic Expected to Grow Exponentially(3) Very High # of Subscribers Per Cell Site in Major Markets(4)
~$150
Xiaomi Redmi 2
2G
2G
3G
3G
4G 4G
2014 2019E
% of Connections by Technology
3G/4G expected to be ~80% by 2019
4.3 4.2
3.1
1.6
Mexico Brazil Colombia U.S.
~$50
BLU Dash JR K
(1) AV&Co. research
(2) AV&Co. research – online prices in Brazil, converted from Brazilian Reals to U.S. Dollars
(3) GSMA Mobile Economy, Latin America, 2014
(4) AV&Co. estimate of the number of subs per unique site location (e.g. towers) in a country based on GSMA Intelligence and CTIA Annual Wireless Industry Survey
(in thousands)
90
1,131
2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E
LatAm Mobile Data Traffic (in petabytes/month)
Our LatAm Presence(1)
(1) As of September 30, 2015.
Brazil
~17,700 sites
Mexico
~8,800 sites
Chile
~1,200 sites
Peru
~600 sites
› More than 32,000 towers and
approximately 100 DAS systems
› #1 or #2 independent tower
operator in all six markets where
we operate
› Key regional customers include
AT&T, Telefónica and América
Móvil
› Existing average tenancy of ~1.5
tenants per tower
› Strong organic growth with select
opportunities for additional
portfolio expansion
› Especially strong presence in key
markets like Mexico and Brazil
Latin American Portfolio Colombia
~3,700 sites
Costa Rica
~500 sites
40
AMT’s History in LatAm
Enter Mexico and Brazil through
small acquisitions and BTS
programs
Market Entries Follow Years of Due Diligence
Enter Colombia, Chile and Peru by
Acquiring ~1,600 TEF towers
Acquire ~2,400 TEF towers in
Mexico; Acquired ~2,400 towers
from VIVO and Sitesharing in Brazil
Acquire NII Mexico & Brazil tower
portfolios and Axtel towers in
Mexico
BR Towers and TIM Brazil
transactions
1999
2000
2010
2013
High Quality
Partners
An Industry
Leader Experienced Local
Management
Teams
Focus on
Operational and
Service
Excellence
2011/12
2014/15
41
LatAm Leadership
42
• EVP and President,
Latam and EMEA
• 14 Years with
American Tower
• Extensive
Background in
Global Tower
Business
Hal Hess
• CEO, LatAm Olivier Puech
• CFO, LatAm and EMEA Katherine
Motlagh
• SVP Finance, LatAm Alejandro
Messmacher
• Director General, Mexico Guillermo
Cordera
• Director General, Brazil Flavio
Cardoso
Experienced Leadership Team Focused on Operational Excellence
42
$188
$875
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
Revenue(2)
(in USD millions)
$140
$517
Operating Profit (in USD millions)
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
~3,200
~32,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
Tower Count
(1) 2015 data reflects Q3 2015 ending tower count and annualized Q3 2015 revenue and operating profit.
(2) Solid bar represents tenant revenue and dotted bar represents pass-through revenue contribution.
Up 10x
Profitable Organic Growth Complemented by New Builds and Acquisitions
2007 2015 2007 2015 2007 2015
20% Tenant Revenue
CAGR 18% CAGR
LatAm Operating Results(1)
Pass-through
revenue
Tenant
revenue
43
$146
$630
LatAm Revenue Overview
Revenue by Tenant(1) Signed New Business by Customer(2)
More than Half of Regional Revenues from Investment-Grade Tenants
América Móvil 7% Oi
9%
Nextel Brazil 11%
TIM 13%
AT&T 22%
Telefónica 23%
Other 15%
América Móvil 11%
TIM 14%
Telefónica 19% AT&T
28%
Other 28%
Brazil 48%
Mexico 37%
Colombia 8%
Other 7%
Revenue by Country(1)
(1) Reflects Q3 2015.
(2) Reflects collocation and amendment activity for first nine months of 2015. Excludes BTS revenues.
44
LatAm Growth History
(1) 2014 and 2015 organic core growth excludes the impact of pass-through revenues.
(2) 2015 Organic Core Growth is year-to-date organic core growth as of the quarter ended September 30, 2015.
Organic Growth
New Build Program
Acquisitions
All Investments Evaluated Using Risk Adjusted, DCF-Based Analysis
370 507
722 ~900
2012 2013 2014 2015E
New Builds per Year
› Incremental Margins of
90%+ on organic revenue
growth
› Significant base of young
assets expected to drive
long-term organic core
growth
2012 2013 2014 2015
Organic Core Growth(1)
Average of ~13%
› High single digit % day one
returns from the anchor
tenant with the ability to
expand returns with future
collocations
› Focus on quality
counterparties such as
Telefónica and AT&T
› >80% of regional portfolio
composed of acquired sites
› Acquired portfolios have
typically performed at or
above initial expectations in
local currency terms
2,504
5,519 5,050 5,310
2012 2013 2014 YTD 2015
Acquired Sites per Year
45
(2)
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
Key Transaction #1 – Site Sharing(1)
46
› ~700 towers in Brazil in 2011
› 13.4x day-1 tower cash flow multiple,
implying a 7.5% NOI yield
› 1.7 tenants per tower on day 1
› Current tenancy of 2.2 tenants per site
› YTD 2015 portfolio organic core
growth of ~9%
› NOI yield nearly 11%
Transaction Overview Current Operating Performance
1.7
2.1 2.2
Day 1 2013 2015
Tenancy
7%
9%
11%
Day 1 2013 2015
NOI Yield(2)
109
132
162
Day 1 2013 2015
Tenant Revenue per Site Ex Straight-line(2)
(BRL in 000s)
(1) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15.
(2) 2015 reflects annualized YTD 2015 results as of 9/30/15. NOI yield reflects local currency. Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
Key Transaction #2 – Telefonica Mexico(1)
47
1.0
1.2 1.3
Day 1 2013 2015
Tenancy
5%
6%
8%
Day 1 2013 2015
NOI Yield(2)
143
172
230
Day 1 2013 2015
Tenant Revenue per Site Ex Straight-line(2)
(MXN in 000s)
› ~2,600 towers acquired from
Telefonica with the first closing
occurring in 2011
› Initial tenancy of 1.0 per tower
› 21.4x day 1 tower cash flow multiple
› Current tenancy of 1.3 tenants per
tower
› 8% Core Organic growth YTD in 2015
despite a slow environment in Mexico
over the past two years
› NOI yield now over 8%
Transaction Overview Current Operating Performance
(1) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15.
(2) 2015 reflects annualized YTD 2015 results as of 9/30/15. NOI yield reflects local currency.
American Tower’s LatAm Competitive Advantage
48
Presence
› Most extensive regional
footprint in LatAm
› A leader in key strategic
markets
› Long-tenured
relationships with major
carriers in region
› Veteran LatAm leadership
team with extensive
industry experience
› Robust regional
organization of more than
700 employees
› Expect to primarily utilize
existing SG&A base for
future expansion,
including M&A integration
10% 11% 9%
7%
2012 2013 2014 3Q15
SG&A as % of Revenue
› Average tenancy of just
~1.5
› Have owned majority of
LatAm sites for <3 years
› Compelling opportunity to
drive lease-up on
previously under-utilized,
under-marketed assets
15%
29%
56%
>5 yrs 3-5 yrs <3 yrs
Site Ownership Length(1)
32
11 9 6
AMT Telesites SBAC GrupoTorresur
# of Latam Towers(1)
(000’s)
(1) As of September 30, 2015.
People Young Portfolio
Key Opportunities
1
2
3
Dynamic Mexican & Brazilian Mobile Markets
Poised to Produce Significant Growth
Mobile Internet Still in Early Stages
Tremendous Need for Denser, Stronger Networks
We Are Focused on Generating Recurring, Long-Term Growth in Latin America
49
LatAm Q&A
LatAm Appendix
Supplementary LatAm Data(1)
Country
Years
Operating
in Market
Avg
Tenancy
Avg Years in
AMT
Portfolio
% of AMT
Rental
Revenue
# of Towers # of DAS
Systems
Mexico 15 1.5 5.6 6.7% 8,733 44
Brazil 14 1.4 2.1 8.6% 17,699 47
Colombia 5 1.6 3.9 1.5% 3,676 1
Other LatAm 2-5 1.5 4.1 1.2% 2,224 6
Country
3 Yr Avg
Organic
Core
Growth
Consolidated
ROIC(2)
Mexico 8.9% 14.3%
Brazil 12.0% 9.0%
Colombia 25.1% 5.4%
Other LatAm 14.2% 7.4%
(1) Reflects data as of September 30, 2015.
(2) Based on year-to-date annualized figures as of 9/30/15.
52
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
Mexico Tower Vintage Analysis(1)
(1) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15. Vintage reflects years in AMT portfolio.
(2) Tenancy reflects legacy Iusacell and Nextel Mexico equipment installations as one tenant per site.
(3) 2015 based on Q3 2015 annualized data. NOI yield reflects local currency.
2.1 2.0
1.1
>10 years 5-10 years <5 years
Tenancy(2)
37% 35%
12%
>10 years 5-10 years <5 years
NOI Yield(3)
809
624
268
>10 years 5-10 years <5 years
Tenant Revenue per Tower Ex Straight-line(3)
(MXP ‘000)
20%
8%
72%
>10 Years 5-10 Years <5 Years
% of Assets by Vintage
53
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
Brazil Tower Vintage Analysis(1)
(1) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15. Vintage reflects years in AMT portfolio.
(2) 2015 based on Q3 2015 annualized data. NOI yield reflects local currency.
2.8
1.9
1.2
>10 years 5-10 years <5 years
Tenancy
50%
32%
7%
>10 years 5-10 years <5 years
NOI Yield(2)
234
100
38
>10 years 5-10 years <5 years
Tenant Revenue per Tower Ex Straight-line(2)
(BRL ‘000)
3% 6%
91%
>10 Years 5-10 Years <5 Years
% of Assets by Vintage
54
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
EMEA Strategic Overview
Hal Hess, EVP and President, Latin America and EMEA
Stephen Harris, SVP and CEO, EMEA
Attractive Macro
Backdrop
The Foundations of Our Investments in EMEA
56
• Legacy European rules of law
• Solid property rights throughout footprint
• Large, growing economies
Competitive Wireless Markets
• Multiple carriers investing in networks
• Recent and future spectrum auctions
• Significant growth in mobile usage and penetration
Partnerships with Large,
Multinational Carriers
• Bharti, Vodafone, MTN, Telefónica and others
Our EMEA Presence Is Predicated on Our Disciplined Investment Evaluation Methodology
Africa Socioeconomic Trends(1)
57
› Total population of ~300
million
› ~60% of population under
the age of 25
› Mobile is absolutely
critical for daily life
• Basic communication
• Banking
• Social media
• Entertainment
Young, Increasingly Connected Middle Class
Strong Incentives for
Continued Wireless
Network Development
Solid Economic Outlook
› Fixed-line penetration
virtually non-existent in
most African markets
› Economic development of
region can be accelerated
through use of mobile
technologies
› Governments have
prioritized mobile
development as key goal
in numerous initiatives
› Historically
underdeveloped markets
› Foreign direct investment
accelerating
› Stable expected growth
EMEA Is Positioned for Strong Long-Term Growth
Sources: Brookings Institute, February 2015, CIA World Factbook, African Economic Outlook Report, 2015, IMF World Economic Outlook, October 2015
(1) Reflects Nigeria, South Africa, Ghana and Uganda.
(2) Reflects average of Nigeria, South Africa, Ghana and Uganda, on a constant price basis.
4.7% 4.4%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Projected GDP Growth(2)
Africa Technology Trends(1)
58
Smartphone Penetration Expected to Rise Quickly(3)
13%
41%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Projected Smartphone Penetration
Mix of Connections Expected to Shift to 3G/4G(2)
2G
2G
3G
3G
4G 4G
2014 2019E
% of Connections by Technology
3G/4G expected to be ~70% by 2020
Wireless Penetration Still Relatively Low
87%
73% 66% 63% 59%
45% 43% 38% 36%
SouthAfrica
Morocco Ghana Egypt Algeria Nigeria Kenya Uganda Tanzania
Wireless Capex Trends Are Solid(4)
$8
$14
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Projected Wireless Capex Spending (In $billions)
(1) Sources: AV&Co. analysis & research, GSMA Intelligence, Broadband Commission for Digital Development- The State of Broadband 2015 (2) For Africa only; Sources: AV&Co. analysis & research, Cisco VNI (2014-2019, Middle East & Africa) (3) For Africa only; Sources: AV&Co. analysis & research, Cisco VNI (MEA) (4) For Sub-Saharan Africa (excludes N. Africa). Sources: AV&Co. analysis & research, GSMA Mobile Economy Sub-Saharan Africa October 2015
AMT Markets
Our EMEA Presence(1)
(1) As of September 30, 2015.
Germany
~2,000 sites
Ghana
~2,100 sites
Nigeria
~4,700 sites South Africa
~1,900 sites
Uganda
~1,400 sites
› More than 12,000 towers
› #1 or #2 independent tower
operator in each of our chosen
markets
› Key regional customers include
Airtel, MTN and Vodafone
› Existing average tenancy of ~1.5
tenants per tower
› Strong Organic Growth with
meaningful opportunities for
additional portfolio expansion
› Positions in key African markets
and a strategic European base in
Germany
EMEA Portfolio
59
AMT’s History in EMEA
Enter Ghana through JV with
MTN
Market Entries Follow Years of Due Diligence
Establish 75% stake in Cell C
Portfolio in South Africa
Acquire KPN towers in Germany
Enter Uganda through JV with
MTN
Enter Nigeria through
acquisition of Airtel towers
2010
2010
2012
2015
2012
High Quality
Partners
High Quality
Towers Experienced
Management Teams
Focus on
Operational
Excellence
60
EMEA Leadership
61
• EVP and President,
Latam and EMEA
• 14 Years with
American Tower
• Extensive
Background in
Global Tower
Business
Hal Hess
• CEO, EMEA Stephen
Harris
• CFO, LatAm and EMEA Katherine
Motlagh
• COO, EMEA Pieter Nel
Experienced Leadership Team Focused on Operational Excellence
62
$58
$371
2011 2008 2009 2010 Q315
Revenue(2)
(in USD millions) $498
$21
$216
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
Operating Profit (in USD millions)
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
~3,200
~12,100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Tower Count
(1) 2015 data reflects Q3 2015 ending tower count and annualized Q3 2015 revenue and operating profit.
(2) Solid bar represents tenant revenue and dotted bar represents pass-through revenue contribution.
Up Nearly 4x
Profitable Organic Growth Complemented by New Builds and Acquisitions
2011 2015 2011 2015 2011 2015
60% Tenant Revenue
CAGR 80% CAGR
EMEA Operating Results(1)
Pass-through
revenue
Tenant
revenue
$85
EMEA Revenue Overview
Revenue by Tenant(1) Signed New Business by Customer(2)
More than 80% of Regional Revenues from Investment-Grade Tenants
Vodafone 7%
Telefonica 8%
Cell C 9%
MTN 28%
Airtel 41%
Other 7%
DFMG 5%
Millicom 5%
Vodafone 11%
MTN 25%
Airtel 33%
Other 22%
Uganda 10%
Germany 11%
South Africa 16%
Ghana 17%
Nigeria 44%
Revenue by Country(1)
(1) Reflects Q3 2015.
(2) Reflects collocation and amendment activity for first nine months of 2015. Excludes BTS revenues.
63
EMEA Growth History(1)(2)
(1) 2014 and 2015 Organic Core Growth excludes the impact of pass-through revenues.
(2) 2015 Organic Core Growth is year-to-date Organic Core Growth as of the quarter ended September 30, 2015.
Organic Growth
New Build Program
Acquisitions
All Investments Evaluated Using Risk Adjusted, DCF-Based Analysis
137
227
171 ~200
2012 2013 2014 2015E
New Builds Per Year
› Driven primarily by new
business from large
multinational tenants
› Incremental margins of
90%+ on organic revenue
growth
2012 2013 2014 YTD 2015
Organic Core Growth
Average of ~16%
› Double digit % day one
returns from anchor tenant
with materially higher
returns after collocations
› Focus on quality
counterparties such as
MTN, Airtel and Vodafone
› >90% of regional portfolio
composed of acquired sites
› Acquired portfolios have
typically performed at or
above initial expectations in
local currency terms
~3,200
252 19
~4,700
2012 2013 2014 YTD 2015
Acquired Sites Per Year
64
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
South Africa Operating History(1)
65
1.5
1.8 1.9
Day 1 2013 2015
Tenancies per Site
18%
22%
29%
Day 1 2013 2015
NOI Yield(2)
276
381
495
Day 1 2013 2015
Tenant Revenue per Site Ex
Straight-line(2)
(ZAR in 000s)
› ~1,800 towers purchased from Cell C
and ~100 towers built subsequently
for several carriers
› 2.5bn ZAR invested since inception
› 5.7x day-1 tower cash flow multiple,
implying an NOI yield of ~18%
› 1.5 tenants per site at closing
(1) 2015 reflects annualized YTD 2015 results as of 9/30/15.
› Current tenancy of 1.9 tenants per site
› 10% Organic Core growth for YTD
2015 vs. the same period in 2014
› NOI yield now ~29%
Transaction Overview Current Operating Performance
(1) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15.
(2) 2015 based on Q3 2015 annualized data. NOI yield reflects local currency. Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
Ghana Operating History(1)
66
1.0
1.5 1.6
Day 1 2013 2015
Tenancies per Site
8%
12%
19%
Day 1 2013 2015
NOI Yield(2)
39
66
112
Day 1 2013 2015
Tenant Revenue per Site Ex
Straight-line(2)
(GHS in 000s)
› ~1,900 towers purchased from MTN
in 2011 as part of JV and
approximately 200 built subsequent
to the initial acquisition
› Approximately 950M GHS invested
since inception
› 12.8x Day 1 tower cash flow multiple,
implying an NOI yield of 7.8%
› Current tenancy of 1.6 tenants per
tower
› 22% Core Organic growth excluding
pass thru for YTD 2015 vs. the same
period in 2014
› NOI yield now ~19%
Transaction Overview Current Operating Performance
(1) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15.
(2) 2015 based on Q3 2015 annualized data. NOI yield reflects local currency. Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
American Tower’s EMEA Competitive Advantage
67
Presence
› Unique footprint in key
Sub-Saharan African
markets and anchor
market in Europe
› #1 or #2 tower operator in
every EMEA market we
operate in
› Able to leverage portfolio
and existing relationships
with key tenants
› Veteran EMEA leadership
team in place from day
one
› Robust regional
organization of more than
500 employees
› Able to substantially
leverage existing SG&A
base for future expansion,
including M&A integration
17% 14% 14%
11%
2012 2013 2014 3Q15
SG&A as % of Revenue
› Leading systems and
processes developed
over 15 years of
international operations
› Efficient fuel management
and site uptime
performance makes
portfolio more attractive
for collocation
› Fuel management
programs focus on
reducing fuel
consumption, improving
site uptime, and reducing
costs, for both AMT and
the operator
12
21
15
7 5
AMT IHS Cellnex Eaton Helios
# of EMEA Towers(1)
(000’s)
People Operational Efficiency
(1) As of 9/30/15.
Key Opportunities
1
2
3
Mobile is in Extremely Early Stages in Most of Africa, with Huge Potential for
Future Development
Recent and Upcoming Spectrum Auctions are Expected to Catalyze
Incremental Investments
Regional Scale and Strong Carrier Relationships Expected to Drive Strong
Growth in Profitability
We Are Focused on Generating Recurring, Long-Term Growth in EMEA
68
EMEA Q&A
EMEA Appendix
Supplementary EMEA Data(1)
Country
Years
Operating
in Market
Avg
Tenancy
Avg Years in
AMT
Portfolio
% of AMT
Rental
Revenue
# of Towers # of DAS
Systems
South Africa 4.8 1.9 4 1.8% 1,917 -
Nigeria <1 1.2 <1 4.5% 4,700 -
Germany 3 1.8 3 1.1% 2,030 -
Ghana/Uganda 4.5 and 3.5 1.5 3.5 2.8% 3,472 14
Country
3 Yr Avg
Organic
Core
Growth
Consolidated
ROIC(3)
South Africa 14.4% 23.8%
Nigeria N/A 6.2%
Germany(2) 4.0% 8.4%
Ghana/Uganda(2) 20.5% 10.6%
(1) Reflects data for quarter ended September 30, 2015.
(2) 2 year average due to more limited operating history.
(3) Based on year-to-date annualized figures as of 9/30/15.
71
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
South Africa Tower Vintage Analysis(1)
31%
9%
3-5 Years <3 Years
NOI Yield(2)
2.0
1.2
3-5 Years <3 Years
Tenancy
536
276
3-5 Years <3 Years
Tenant Revenue per Tower Ex Straight-line(2)
(ZAR ‘000)
81%
19%
3-5 Years <3 Years
% of Assets by Vintage
(1) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15. Vintage reflects years in AMT portfolio.
(2) 2015 based on Q3 2015 annualized data. NOI yield reflects local currency.
72
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
U.S. Strategic Overview
Steven Marshall, EVP and President, United States
Rod Smith, SVP and CFO, United States
Attractive Macro
Backdrop
The Foundations of our Investments in the U.S.
74
• Largest economy in the world
• Constructive legal, property rights and regulatory framework
• Good, stable, long-term growth prospects
Competitive Wireless Market
• Multiple carriers investing in networks
• Recent and future spectrum auctions
• Significant growth in mobile data usage and smartphones
Partnerships with Large,
National Carriers
• AT&T, Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile and Sprint
Our Home U.S. Market Fits Squarely Within Our Investment Requirements
Key U.S. Demand Driver: Mobile Data
75
0.02 3 10 8
276
Sending an email 3 minutesong
3 minute video clip 30 minutes Internetbrowsing
30 minuteTV show
Average Data Used by Activity (in megabytes)
150x 500x
400x
13,800x
Note: 1 MB equals 1024 KB
Sources: Altman Vilandrie & Co. research, Verizon, AT&T
More Advanced Devices = Access to More Advanced Applications
More Advanced Applications = More Mobile Data Consumption
= Incremental Demand for Towers
2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E
U.S. Data Traffic by Device Type (in exabytes)
Feature Phones Smartphones Computing Devices M2M Wearables
43.4
2.2
Sources: Altman Vilandrie & Co. analysis integrating multiple sources (eMarketer, BIA/Kelsey, CTIA, Yankee Group/451 Research, Cisco VNI, Frost & Sullivan, company 10Ks)
(2)
(1)
(1) 1 exabyte is equivalent to 1 billion gigabytes.
(2) Computing devices represent tablets and laptops.
Key U.S. Demand Driver: Mobile Data (Continued)
76
~3.2B(1)
Total Revenue
56% In Top 100 BTA
~40K Sites
Our U.S. Presence(1)
328 DAS sites
~2.2 Tenants per Tower
1,300+
Employees
77%(1)
Gross Margin
(1) Reflects 2015 outlook midpoints, as reported in the Company’s Form 8-K, dated October 29, 2015 and/or metrics as of 9/30/15.
(2) Invested Capital 2012 to 9/30/15 77
U.S. Leadership
78
• EVP and President,
US Tower Division
• 8 Years with
American Tower
• Prior to joining AMT,
CEO, National Grid
Wireless
Steven Marshall
• SVP & CFO Rodney
Smith
• SVP & General Counsel Steve
Vondran
• SVP Engineering & Operations Bud
Noel
• SVP Sales & Marketing Phillip
Rosenthall
• SVP Managed Networks Gerard
Ainsztein
Experienced Team Focused on Accretive Investments & Operational and Service Excellence
U.S. Strategic Overview
79
› Invested total of ~$12.4B
› Acquired over 17,000 towers(1) and constructed ~1,200
› Deployed over 3,000 shared generators
› Built 70+ DAS and small cell networks
› Acquired more than 3,000 ground leases
› Acquired Global Tower Partners
› Acquired rights to Verizon Tower Portfolio
› Active program in place to continue evaluating
additional asset portfolios
› Disciplined approach to customer contracts
› Mutually beneficial long-term master lease
agreements
› Increase growth visibility and minimize churn
› Enhanced systems and processes, including
HR, IT and Operational systems
› Continual focus on application cycle times and
optimization
(1) Includes the acquisition of rights to ~11,500-tower Verizon portfolio.
Contract Negotiations Capital Deployment 2012-2015
M&A Transactions People and Systems
U.S. Operating Results(1)
80
› Double digit revenue growth driven by organic growth and new assets
› Focused on driving sustainable, profitable growth
› Organic core gross margin conversion ratio of over 90% expected in 2015
$1.24B
$3.15B
2007 2015E
$0.89B
$2.33B
2007 2015E
~19.5k
~40k
2007 2015E
~12.8% CAGR ~12.4% CAGR
~9.6% CAGR
Rental & Management Revenue Tower Count Operating Profit
(1) 2015E Rental and Management Revenue and Operating Profit Reflects 2015 outlook midpoints, as reported in the Company’s Form 8-K, dated October 29, 2015.
Total Revenue(1) Executed New Business Revenue by Product(2)
U.S. Revenue Overview
~87% of Total Revenue in 2015 from the Big 4 Carriers
(1) Reflects YTD 2015 as of September 30, 2015.
(2) Reflects YTD mix as of September 30, 2015.
29%
23% 15%
20%
13%
AT&T Verizon T-Mobile Sprint Other
Collocations 22% 44% 67% 24% 74%
Amendments 78% 56% 33% 76% 26%
Other
(2)
81
36% 21%
11% 19%
9%
8%
9%
32%
24%
21% 34%
36%
29%
47% 45%
11%
2% 3% 1% 2%
2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD
Other T-Mobile Verizon AT&T Sprint
92%
5% 3%
Towers
Managed Networks
Generators, Ground & Other
Managed Networks Opportunity
82
Rooftops
› Unique asset base concentrated in
densely populated urban areas
throughout the U.S.
› Part of AMT’s comprehensive suite
of network solutions for our
customers
Indoor
› Portfolio centered on exclusive
locations in casinos, malls,
convention centers and sports
arenas
› Due to signal propagation
limitations, 80% of future small cell
deployments are expected to be
indoors
Backhaul / Technology
› AMT selectively deploys fiber to
support small cell projects today
› Technology risks are considered in
project-based hurdle rates
› SDN, SON, wireless backhaul
technology developments and WDM
Managed Networks Round Out Our Full Suite of Infrastructure Solutions for Carriers
~300 networks ~17,000 antennas
~2.1 tenants
~30 networks ~560 nodes ~1.1 tenants
Abbreviations: SDN = Software Defined Network SON = Self-Optimizing Network WDM = Wavelength-division multiplexing
Outdoor
› Portfolios centered in dense urban
and challenging macro tower
zoning environments
› Due to high capital intensity, 80% of
small cell capex is expected to be
spent outdoors
› Solid trends supported by
growth in mobile data
usage
› Focus on long-term
contracts and churn
minimization has yielded
strong, consistent growth
U.S. Growth History
Organic Growth(1)
New Builds(1)
Comprehensive Growth Strategy Has More than Doubled U.S. Business in 6 Years
8.4% 7.3%
8.7% 9.6%
~7%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
U.S. Organic Core Growth
245 249
331
657
~100
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
U.S. New Builds
› New build strategy
complements organic
growth and M&A program
› Important portion of our
overall value proposition for
carrier customers
(1) Reflects 2015 outlook midpoints, as reported in the Company’s Form 8-K, dated October 29, 2015 and/or metrics as of 9/30/15. Organic core growth metric is net
of all churn.
Average of ~8%
Acquisitions
› 44% of current domestic
tower count added through
acquisition since 2011
› Younger, less mature
portfolio provides
compelling incremental
collocation opportunity
204 716
4,928
242
~11,500
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
U.S. # of Towers Acquired
83
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
Deal Highlights
› ~7,800 sites
› Day one tenancy of ~1.7
› Exclusive rights for >300 In-
building locations
› ~2/3 of revenue from “Big 4”
Financial Performance
› Current ROIC of ~17%
U.S. M&A Overview
(1) Reflects acquisition of rights for ~11,500 towers.
(2) Reflects average expected annual growth over first 10 years in AMT portfolio.
(3) 2015E.
(4) Wireless & Broadcast Towers only.
Spectrasite Merger (2005)
Global Tower Partners (2013)
Verizon Towers (2015)(1)
Deal Highlights
› ~11,500 sites
› Day one tenancy of ~1.4
› 10yr Verizon anchor term
› ~95% of revenue from Big 4
Financial Performance
› Expected annual revenue
growth of 9-10% over 10 year
period (2)
Deal Highlights
› ~4,800 U.S. sites
› Day one tenancy of ~2.0
› 70% of revenue from Big 4
Financial Performance
› Gross Margin%(3) : 74.4%
› SG&A synergies ahead of plan
1.7
2.6 2.9
Year 1 2010 Q315
Spectrasite Tower Tenancy
$188m
9.2% $205m
Q1-Q3 '14Revenue
Organic CoreGrowth
Q1-Q3 '15Revenue
GTP Organic Core Growth(4)
97%
% of VZ Site Audits Completed
84
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
85
› Drive customer
connectivity
› Maintain efficient cycle
times and provide best
possible customer
experience
› Invest in people,
processes and systems
› Continue to focus on
cost efficiency at all
levels of organization
› Evaluate all accretive
investment
opportunities, both in
macro towers and
other complementary
areas
› Maintain focus on
investments that
generate the best risk-
adjusted returns
› Support international
activities
Key Priorities Looking Forward
› Utilize expanded
nationwide portfolio to
drive organic growth
› Continue to employ
disciplined contract
structures to drive
additional value
› Manage operating
expenses and reduce
SG&A as a % of
revenue
› Proactively extend and
purchase ground leases
Enhance Margins Operational Excellence Investment in Assets
Key Opportunities
1
2
3
Renew/Establish NPV-Accretive Master Lease Agreements
Utilize Upcoming Public Safety Build and New Spectrum Assets Expected
to Come to Market to Drive Incremental Growth
We Are Focused on Generating Recurring, Long-Term Growth in the U.S.
Drive Strong Leasing Growth on Previously Under-Utilized Verizon Tower
Portfolio
86
U.S. Q&A
U.S. Appendix
Supplementary U.S. Data(1)
(1) As of 9/30/15.
(2) As of the quarter ended 9/30/15.
Country
Years
Operating in
Market(2)
Avg Years in
AMT
Portfolio(1)
% of AMT
Rental
Revenue(2)
# of
Towers
Avg
Tenancy
# of DAS
Systems Consolidated ROIC
U.S. 20 7.0 66.6% 40,066 2.2 328 9.3%
89
U.S. Tower Vintage Analysis(1)
(1) Tenant Revenue per Tower represents annualized Q3 2015 results. Vintage reflects years in AMT portfolio.
(2) Rental revenue excludes straight-line and services revenue.
(3) % of Towers and Tenancy per Tower is only for wireless and broadcast assets.
2.9
1.8 1.6
>10 years 5-10 years <5 years
Tenancy per Tower(3)
19%
13%
5%
>10 years 5-10 years <5 years
NOI Yield
103
57
43
>10 years 5-10 years <5 years
49%
6%
46%
>10 Years 5-10 Years <5 Years
% of Towers by Vintage(3)
Tenant Rental Revenue per Tower(1)(2)
(USD in thousands)
90
American Tower Corporation 2015 Investor Day Closing Remarks
Tom Bartlett, CFO
92
$1.0B
$3.0B
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
Adjusted EBITDA
$0.6B
$2.1B
AFFO
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation and reconciliations to GAAP measures can be found at www.americantower.com.
$1.4B
$4.7B
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
Rental and Management Segment Revenue
(1) 2015E reflects midpoint of 2015 outlook, as reported in the Company’s 8-K, dated October 29, 2015.
15.9% CAGR
2007 2015E 2007 2015E 2007 2015E
15.2% CAGR 16.2% CAGR
We Have Generated Strong, Consistent Results Over the
Long Term While Distributing Cash to Stockholders(1)
Definitions and reconciliations to GAAP measures are provided at the end of this presentation.
$3.6B Share
Repurchases
$2.1B Common
Stock
Dividend
$22B Capex and
Acquisitions
Since 2007, we have
deployed nearly
$30 Billion
$1.52
$5.02
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
AFFO Per Share
9.0% 9.6%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15A
Return on Invested Capital
We Have Simultaneously Grown Our Global Portfolio, AFFO
per Share, and Return on Invested Capital
93
(1) Reflects Midpoint of 2015 Outlook, as reported on the Company’s Form 8-K, dated October 29, 2015. AFFO per share calculation assumes 2015 weighted average share count of 423m.
(2) 2007 cash tax in ROIC calculation has been adjusted to exclude a cash tax refund received in 2007 related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses. Q3 2015 cash tax has been
adjusted to exclude a one-time cash tax payment associated with folding the GTP REIT into the American Tower REIT.
(3) 2013 has been adjusted to reflect a full year contribution from the GTP assets.
(4) 3Q15A reflects annualized 3Q15 results.
(2) (3)
~23k
~100k
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E
Global Tower Count
(1)
Key Considerations
› Consolidated ROIC up despite the
addition of nearly 80,000 new
assets
› Strong ROIC trends reflect 90%+
gross margin conversion rates for
organic leasing revenue growth
› ROIC on assets in the portfolio
since 2007 of ~17%
› We expect to meaningfully expand
ROIC on our existing assets over
time
(1)
Definitions and reconciliations to GAAP measures are provided at the end of this presentation.
(4)
13%
13% 11% 11%
10%
2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15A
U.S. Rental and Management Segment NOI Yield
Legacy Sites
Total
We Have Been Extremely Disciplined With Our Investments
Across Our Global Footprint
13% 12% 12%
14%
2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15A
Major International Market NOI Yield(1)
Legacy Sites
Total
14%
94
21%
16%
› Legacy NOI yield expansion has been driven by
strong organic revenue growth
› Excellent opportunity to drive similar results on
GTP and Verizon portfolios
› NOI yields on legacy assets up ~50% in less
than five years
› Positioned to replicate this type of NOI yield
expansion on new assets
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation
(2) (2)
(1) Major international markets include Brazil, Mexico, India and South Africa. FX rates for numerator and denominator have been re-measured at each period.
(2) Legacy sites reflect sites in the portfolio since 2011.
(3) 3Q15A reflects annualized 3Q15 results.
(4) 2013 reflects annualized impact of GTP portfolio.
(3) (3) (4)
We Have Positioned Ourselves to Benefit from Growth in
Broadband Wireless in a Diverse Array of Markets
95
Region Population(1) # of AMT
Sites
Average
Tenancy
2015 YTD
Organic Core
Growth
U.S. ~0.3B ~40k ~2.2 ~7%
LatAm ~0.4B ~32k ~1.5 ~10%
India(2) ~1.3B ~57k ~2.0 ~10%
EMEA ~0.4B ~12k ~1.5 ~13%
Total ~2.4B ~140k ~1.9 ~8%
(1) Reflects markets in which American Tower operates.
(2) Pro forma for Viom transaction, except for YTD organic core growth.
Source: CIA World Factbook
We Expect to Benefit from Our Global Diversification for Many Years to Come
96
We Have Managed Our Investment-Grade Balance Sheet to
Position Us for Success in Varied Interest Rate Environments
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Debt Balances as of September 30, 2015(1)(2)
$ in millions
Senior Notes U.S. Secured Debt Drawn Bank Debt
Key Balance Sheet Takeaways
› Weighted average debt tenor of over 5 years, with weighted average cost of debt of ~3.4%(2)
› ~70% of balance sheet is composed of fixed-rate debt
› Laddered maturities, with continued focus on opportunistic refinancing at attractive rates
› Minimal near-term maturities
› Liquidity of nearly $2 Billion
(1) Excludes approximately $462 million of subsidiary and international debt.
(2) Includes the impact of amendment agreements effective October 28, 2015 that extended the maturity dates of the 2013 Credit Facility, the 2014 Credit
Facility and the Term Loan to June 28, 2019, January 29, 2021 and January 29, 2021, respectively.
$0.2B
$1.5B
$5.1B
$0.7B
$2.3B
$1.0B $1.3B
$1.9B
$2.6B
Financial Policy Long Term Target
Net Leverage 3-5x (LQA)
Fixed Rate Debt 80% of Debt
Secured Debt 25% of Debt
Local Financing Opportunistic
Liquidity $150m cash
$1B total
Our Embedded Operational FX Hedges Have Been Effective
Over the Long Term
97
20
60
100
140
180
1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015
CPI and FX Adjusted FX Only Adjusted
Day 1 = 100 USD
Historical Value of Hypothetical Brazilian Lease
40
100
160
220
280
1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015
CPI and FX Adjusted FX Only Adjusted
Day 1 = 100 USD
Historical Value of Hypothetical Mexican Lease
Key Takeaways
› CPI-linked contractual escalators in our international markets have substantially compensated for
currency devaluation over the long term
› We have put USD-denominated leases into place in select international markets (Nigeria)
› We are continuing to increase our local currency debt as an additional layer of hedging FX
› We utilize conservative future FX assumptions as part of our evaluation of international transactions
Looking Forward
We Are Focused on Continuing Our Prudent
Capital Deployment Strategy
99
$0.90 $1.10
$1.40
$1.81
2012 2013 2014 2015
Common Dividend
73%
14%
2% 12%
2012-2015 Capital Deployment(1)
Acquisitions
Discretionary Capex
Non-DiscretionaryCapexCommon Dividends /Buybacks
Nearly $20B Deployed Since 2012
› Dividend has more than doubled since
2012
› Expect payout ratio to increase as
NOLs are utilized and depreciation tax
shield declines
› Have deployed approximately $3B in
capex, over $14B for acquisitions, and
over $2B in dividends since 2012
› ~87% of spending has been for
discretionary growth initiatives
› Focused on maintaining investment grade
credit rating
› Continuing to target ~5x net leverage by
4Q16
(1) 2015 spending reflects midpoint of 2015 outlook for capex, as reported in the Company’s Form 8-K, dated October 29, 2015, and acquisitions closed year to date as of 9/30/15..
Disciplined Capital Allocation Continues to Drive Strong Total Stockholder Returns
Our Business Is Built for Long-Term
Success
100
Diversified Global Portfolio
Secular Demand Trends
Disciplined Capital
Allocation Process
Prudent Balance Sheet
Deep Talent Pool
› Meaningful Organic
Growth
› Global New Build and
Acquisition Programs
› Strong AFFO per Share
growth
› Robust Growth in
Common Share Dividend
We Expect to Drive Compelling Total Stockholder Returns over the Long Term
Definitions are provided at the end of this presentation.
Thank You
Q&A
Definitions Adjusted EBITDA: Net income before Income (loss) on discontinued operations, net; Income (loss) from equity method investments; Income tax benefit (provision); Other income (expense); Gain (loss) on retirement of long-term obligations; Interest expense; Interest income; Other operating income (expense); Depreciation, amortization and accretion; and Stock-based compensation expense.
Adjusted EBITDA Margin: the percentage that results from dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total revenue.
Adjusted Funds From Operations, or AFFO: NAREIT Funds From Operations before (i) straight-line revenue and expense, (ii) stock-based compensation expense, (iii) the non-cash portion of our tax provision, (iv) non-real estate related depreciation, amortization and accretion, (v) amortization of deferred financing costs, capitalized interest, debt discounts and premiums and long-term deferred interest charges, (vi) other income (expense), (vii) gain (loss) on retirement of long-term obligations, (viii) other operating income (expense), and adjustments for (ix) unconsolidated affiliates and (x) noncontrolling interest, less cash payments related to capital improvements and cash payments related to corporate capital expenditures.
AFFO per Share: Adjusted Funds From Operations divided by the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding.
Churn: Revenue lost when a tenant cancels or does not renew its lease, and in limited circumstances, such as a tenant bankruptcy, reductions in lease rates on existing leases.
Core Growth: (Rental and management revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, Gross Margin and Operating Profit) the increase or decrease, expressed as a percentage, resulting from a comparison of financial results for a current period with corresponding financial results for the corresponding period in a prior year, in each case, excluding the impact of pass-through revenue (expense), straight-line revenue and expense recognition, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and material one-time items.
NAREIT Funds From Operations: Net income before gains or losses from the sale or disposal of real estate, real estate related impairment charges, real estate related depreciation, amortization and accretion and dividends on preferred stock, and including adjustments for (i) unconsolidated affiliates and (ii) noncontrolling interest.
Net Leverage Ratio: Net debt (total debt, less cash and cash equivalents) divided by last quarter annualized Adjusted EBITDA.
NOI Yield: the percentage that results from dividing gross margin by gross property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets.
New Property Core Growth: (Rental and management revenue) the increase or decrease, expressed as a percentage, on the properties the Company has added to its portfolio since the beginning of the prior period, in each case, excluding the impact of pass-through revenue (expense), straight-line revenue (expense), foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and significant one-time items.
102
Definitions Organic Core Growth: (Rental and management revenue) the increase or decrease, expressed as a percentage, resulting from a comparison of financial results for a current period with corresponding financial results for the corresponding period in a prior year, in each case, excluding the impact of pass-through revenue (expense), straight-line revenue and expense recognition, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, significant one-time items and revenue associated with new properties that the Company has added to the portfolio since the beginning of the prior period.
Pass-through Revenues: In several of our international markets we pass through certain operating expenses to our tenants, including in Latin America where we primarily pass through ground rent expenses, and in India and South Africa, where we primarily pass through fuel costs. We record pass-through as revenue and a corresponding offsetting expense for these events.
Return on Invested Capital: Adjusted EBITDA less improvement and corporate capital expenditures and cash taxes, divided by gross property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets.
Segment Gross Margin: segment revenue less segment operating expenses, excluding stock-based compensation expense recorded in costs of operations; depreciation, amortization and accretion; selling, general, administrative and development expense; and other operating expenses. International rental and management segment includes interest income, TV Azteca, net.
Segment Gross Margin Conversion Rate: the percentage that results from dividing the change in gross margin by the change in revenue.
Segment Operating Profit: Segment gross margin less segment selling, general, administrative and development expense attributable to the segment, excluding stock-based compensation expense and corporate expenses. International rental and management segment includes interest income, TV Azteca, net.
Straight-line expenses: We calculate straight-line ground rent expense for our ground leases based on the fixed non-cancellable term of the underlying ground lease plus all periods, if any, for which failure to renew the lease imposes an economic penalty to us such that renewal appears, at the inception of the lease, to be reasonably assured. Certain of our tenant leases require us to exercise available renewal options pursuant to the underlying ground lease, if the tenant exercises its renewal option. For towers with these types of tenant leases at the inception of the ground lease, we calculate our straight-line ground rent over the term of the ground lease, including all renewal options required to fulfill the tenant lease obligation.
Straight-line revenues: We calculate straight-line rental revenues from our tenants based on the fixed escalation clauses present in non-cancellable lease agreements, excluding those tied to the Consumer Price Index or other inflation-based indices, and other incentives present in lease agreements with our tenants. We recognized revenues on a straight-line basis over the fixed, non-cancellable terms of the applicable leases.
103
(1) Calculation of AFFO excludes start-up related capital spending.
(2) 2007 cash tax included in AFFO calculation has been adjusted to exclude a cash tax refund received in 2007 related to the carry back of certain federal net
operating losses.
In millions, totals may not add due to rounding
Historical Reconciliations ($ in millions. Totals may not add due to rounding.)
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO ADJUSTED EBITDA
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15
Net income $56.6 $347.4 $247.1 $373.6 $381.8 $594.0 $482.2 $803.2 $193.3 $221.7 $206.6 $181.6 $195.5 $157.2 $97.7
Loss (income) from discontinued operations , net 36.4 (111.0) (8.2) (0.0) - - - - - - - - - - -
Income from continuing operations $93.0 $236.4 $238.9 $373.6 $381.8 $594.0 $482.2 $803.2 $193.3 $221.7 $206.6 $181.6 $195.5 $157.2 $97.7
Income from equity method investments (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) - - - - - - - - -
Income tax provis ion 59.8 135.5 182.6 182.5 125.1 107.3 59.5 62.5 17.6 21.8 10.4 12.6 23.9 14.0 94.2
Other (income) expense (20.7) (6.0) (1.3) (0.3) 123.0 38.3 207.5 62.1 3.7 16.5 34.0 7.8 54.5 2.1 66.7
Loss (ga in) on reti rement of long-term obl igations 35.4 4.9 18.2 1.9 0.0 0.4 38.7 3.5 0.2 1.3 (3.0) 4.9 3.7 75.1 0.0
Interest expense 235.8 253.6 249.8 246.0 311.9 401.7 458.3 580.2 143.3 146.2 143.2 147.5 147.9 148.5 149.8
Interest income (10.8) (3.4) (1.7) (5.0) (7.4) (7.7) (9.7) (14.0) (2.0) (2.3) (3.9) (5.9) (3.0) (4.4) (4.5)
Other operating expenses 9.2 11.2 19.2 35.9 58.1 62.2 71.5 68.5 13.9 12.8 11.2 30.7 7.8 17.4 15.7
Depreciation, amortization and accretion 522.9 405.3 414.6 460.7 555.5 644.3 800.1 1,003.8 245.8 245.4 249.1 263.5 263.5 328.4 341.1
Stock-based compensation expense 54.6 54.8 60.7 52.6 47.4 52.0 68.1 80.2 24.6 18.8 18.3 18.4 29.9 24.0 18.3
ADJUSTED EBITDA $979.3 $1,092.3 $1,180.9 $1,347.7 $1,595.4 $1,892.4 $2,176.4 $2,649.9 $640.5 $682.2 $666.0 $661.3 $723.7 $762.3 $779.0
Divided by total revenue $1,456.6 $1,593.5 $1,724.1 $1,985.3 $2,443.5 $2,876.0 $3,361.4 $4,100.0 $984.1 $1,031.5 $1,038.2 $1,046.3 $1,079.2 $1,174.4 $1,237.9
ADJUSTED EBITDA MARGIN 67% 69% 68% 68% 65% 66% 65% 65% 65% 66% 64% 63% 67% 65% 63%
AFFO RECONCILIATION (1)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15
Adjusted EBITDA $979.3 $1,092.3 $1,180.9 $1,347.7 $1,595.4 $1,892.4 $2,176.4 $2,649.9 $640.5 $682.2 $666.0 $661.3 $723.7 $762.3 $779.0
Stra ight-l ine revenue (69.7) (50.4) (36.3) (105.2) (144.0) (165.8) (147.7) (123.7) (31.2) (33.1) (31.9) (27.4) (33.8) (35.5) (38.8)
Stra ight-l ine expense 26.7 27.6 26.6 22.3 31.0 33.7 29.7 38.4 9.5 7.9 12.4 8.7 8.8 14.0 16.4
Cash interest (227.5) (244.0) (240.4) (237.6) (300.8) (380.6) (435.3) (571.6) (139.9) (143.1) (144.7) (144.0) (144.3) (143.2) (142.5)
Interest Income 10.8 3.4 1.7 5.0 7.4 7.7 9.7 14.0 2.0 2.3 3.9 5.9 3.0 4.4 4.5
Cash received (paid) for income taxes (2) (35.3) (35.1) (40.2) (36.4) (53.9) (69.3) (51.7) (69.2) (19.1) (16.7) (16.6) (16.8) (14.7) (15.2) (7.3)
Dividends on preferred s tock - - - - - - - (23.9) - (4.4) (7.7) (11.8) (9.8) (26.8) (26.8)
Capita l Improvement Capex (29.2) (32.5) (32.5) (31.4) (60.8) (75.4) (81.2) (75.0) (17.2) (17.2) (15.8) (24.7) (16.8) (19.8) (22.2)
Corporate Capex (12.7) (5.6) (8.1) (11.6) (18.7) (20.0) (30.4) (24.1) (5.2) (3.9) (5.7) (9.3) (2.3) (3.2) (4.3)
AFFO $642.4 $755.8 $851.7 $952.8 $1,055.5 $1,222.6 $1,469.5 $1,814.7 $439.3 $473.9 $459.8 $441.7 $513.6 $536.8 $558.1
104
2015 Outlook Reconciliations
(1) As reported in the Company's 8-K filed on October 29, 2015
(2) The Company's outlook is based on the following average foreign currency exchange rates to 1.00 U.S. Dollar for the fourth quarter of 2015: (a) 3.95 Brazilian Reais; (b) 695 Chilean
Pesos; (c) 3,100 Colombian Pesos; (d) 0.91 Euros; (e) 4.10 Ghanaian Cedi; (f) 66.00 Indian Rupees; (g) 16.80 Mexican Pesos; (h) 200 Nigerian Naira; (i) 3.25 Peruvian Soles; (j) 13.75
South African Rand; and (k) 3,700 Ugandan Shillings.
(3) These assumptions are based on the more conservative of: (a) the 30-day average spot rate; or (b) the average Bloomberg forecast for each currency.
105
Reconciliations of Outlook for Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA:
($ in millions)
Net income $670 to $690
Interest expense 593 to 610
Depreciation, amortization and accretion 1,262 to 1,272
Income Tax Provision(3)170 to 140
Stock based compensation expense 90 - 90
Other, including other operating expenses, interest income, loss on retirement of long-term
obligations, income (loss) on equity method investments and other income (expense) 251 - 254
Adjusted EBITDA 3,035$ to 3,055$
Reconciliations of Outlook for Net Income to Adjusted Funds From Operations:
($ in millions)
Net income $670 to $690
Straight-line revenue (152) - (152)
Straight-line expense 55 - 55
Depreciation, amortization and accretion 1,262 to 1,272
Non-cash stock based compensation expense 90 - 90
Non-cash portion of tax provision (6) to (9)
GTP REIT One-Time Charge 93 - 93
Non-cash portion of interest expense 22 - 22
Other, including other operating expenses, loss on retirement of long-term obligations
and other expense (income) 266 to 269
Dividends on preferred stock (90) - (90)
Capital improvement capital expenditures (80) to (90)
Corporate capital expenditures (15) - (15)
Adjusted Funds From Operations 2,115$ 2,135$
Divided by Weighted Average Shares Outstanding 423 - 423
Adjusted Funds From Operations per Share $5.00 to $5.05
Full Year 2015
Full Year 2015
In millions, except per share amounts. totals may not add due to rounding
Risk Factors This presentation contains "forward-looking statements" concerning our goals, beliefs, expectations, strategies, objectives, plans,
future operating results and underlying assumptions, and other statements that are not necessarily based on historical facts.
Examples of these statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our full year 2015 outlook, foreign currency
exchange rates, our expectation regarding the leasing demand for communications real estate and the anticipated contributions
of recently signed and closed acquisitions. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated in our forward-looking
statements as a result of various important factors, including: (1) decrease in demand for our communications sites would
materially and adversely affect our operating results, and we cannot control that demand; (2) if our tenants share site
infrastructure to a significant degree or consolidate or merge, our growth, revenue and ability to generate positive cash flows
could be materially and adversely affected; (3) increasing competition for tenants in the tower industry may materially and
adversely affect our pricing; (4) competition for assets could adversely affect our ability to achieve our return on investment
criteria; (5) our business is subject to government regulations and changes in current or future laws or regulations could restrict
our ability to operate our business as we currently do; (6) our leverage and debt service obligations may materially and adversely
affect us; (7) failure to successfully and efficiently integrate acquired or leased assets, including those leased from Verizon, into
our operations may adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition; (8) our expansion initiatives involve a
number of risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our operating results, disrupt our operations or expose us to
additional risk; (9) our foreign operations are subject to economic, political and other risks that could materially and adversely
affect our revenues or financial position, including risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; (10) a
substantial portion of our revenue is derived from a small number of tenants, and we are sensitive to changes in the
creditworthiness and financial strength of our tenants; (11) new technologies or changes in a tenant’s business model could make
our tower leasing business less desirable and result in decreasing revenues; (12) if we fail to remain qualified as a REIT, we will
be subject to tax at corporate income tax rates, which may substantially reduce funds otherwise available; (13) complying with
REIT requirements may limit our flexibility or cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities; (14) certain of our business
activities may be subject to corporate level income tax and foreign taxes, which reduce our cash flows and may create deferred
and contingent tax liabilities;
106
Risk Factors (continued)
(15) we may need additional financing to fund capital expenditures, future growth and expansion initiatives and to satisfy our
REIT distribution requirements; (16) if we are unable to protect our rights to the land under our towers, it could adversely affect
our business and operating results; (17) if we are unable or choose not to exercise our rights to purchase towers that are subject
to lease and sublease agreements at the end of the applicable period, our cash flows derived from such towers will be
eliminated; (18) restrictive covenants in the agreements related to our securitization transactions, our credit facilities and our debt
securities could materially and adversely affect our business by limiting flexibility, and we may be prohibited from paying
dividends on our common stock if we fail to pay scheduled dividends on our preferred stock, which may jeopardize our
qualification for taxation as a REIT; (19) our costs could increase and our revenues could decrease due to perceived health risks
from radio emissions, especially if these perceived risks are substantiated; (20) we could have liability under environmental and
occupational safety and health laws; and (21) our towers, data centers or computer systems may be affected by natural disasters
and other unforeseen events for which our insurance may not provide adequate coverage. For additional information regarding
factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in our forward-looking statements, we refer you to
the information contained in Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. We undertake no obligation to
update the information contained in this presentation to reflect subsequently occurring events or circumstances.
107