American Alliance for Hardwood Plywoodc.ymcdn.com/.../1100C_AAHP_IWPA_Presentation.pdf · IWPA Members Active Participation ... This meeting is designed to address specific questions

  • Upload
    phamnhu

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • American Alliance for

    Hardwood Plywood

  • Impact of 2016 Antidumping (AD) and Countervailing Duty (CVD)

    Petition against Chinese Hardwood Plywood

    IWPA Convention San Francisco, CA

    April 6, 2017

  • AAHP BACKGROUND

    Formed in late 2012 - An organization of leading American importers, distributors & manufacturers of hardwood plywood

    Members include both IWPA members and non-members

    The AAHP successfully defeated the 2012 petition

    Has remained strong and unified for 4+ Years

    Once again acting as lead voice defending against a flawed petition

    Presentation will show why IWPA members, and at-risk parties, need to get more actively involved

  • AAHP Members Include

  • PRACTICALLY SPEAKING

    Imports arriving after April 17th will very likely incur (currently unknown) Preliminary CVD rates paid in cash deposits

    The DOC deadline to sign the Preliminary AD determination is June 16

    ITC Final Phase hearing date not yet set - Estimated Late October/ Early November 2017 with Final Determination expected 30 days after

    Historically CVD lower than AD rates but we are in a TRUMPIAN world now

    Initial duties may be retroactive by 90 days if Critical Circumstances are found

    Exposure to additional duties on both CVD and AD begins the date final ruling is posted in the Federal Register thru the ANNUAL Administrative Review process

    Net effect of the petition and future retroactive liability is to DETER subject imports immediately - if not indefinitely

  • Retroactivity AD/CVD law retroactive in nature, rather than prospective

    Duties set by DOC but what CBP collects are estimated deposits only

    System works with an Investigation (now) followed by a series of annual Administrative Reviews that recalculate duties / retroactively adjust

    Petitioning industries like the uncertainty of the US retroactive system because it discourages all imports, whether or not unfair

    Reviews can basically go on.. and on indefinitely

    Importers ultimate liability cannot be known

    How would one go about selling????

  • PRODUCTS WITHIN THE SCOPE List is too long/wide for this presentation

    Carve-outs that existed in 2012 case have largely been removed

    Scope has not been finalized, can change over time

    Scope Clarifications Best discussed with professional DOC counsel

    Generally/Cynically

    Hardwood Plywood products the Petitioners historically havent produce

    Dont currently produce

    Dont want to focus their operations on and/or

    Cannot make in sufficient quantity to support US demand

  • SCOPE COMPLEXITY

    Scope language so wide

    If not tightened up, will make CBPs tasks more challenging

    Will potentially lead to heightened scrutiny

    Scope Challenges

    Major Retailers Ikea, Target, Others filed motions related to crossover of HTS codes for HWPW vs finished goods (RTA furnishing and cabinetry)

    Major US Furniture industry Raised objections to define scope

    Hardwood Plywood vs Component parts vs RTA Furniture vs RTA Cabinets

  • What can we expect?

    Costs & Risk - To become increasing unknown now & going forward

    Market Volatility & Uncertainty - Highly probable, almost certain

    Transition Period

    Markets will adjust but process takes time

    Cannot immediately replace the total volume supplied to the US market

    Ports / steamship lines / transport companies - adversely effected at least temporarily

    Opportunity & Loss - There will be winners and losers

    Scrutiny CBP / Enforce and Protect

  • Plywood Version 1.0 vs 2.0

    Scope is much wider now

    Petitioners counsel has changed

    Political climate has changed considerably (TRUMP + Anti-China)

    2016 case will be the first DOC/ITC case litigated during the Trump Admin

    Success before the ITC in 2013, while certainly encouraging, does not mean history will repeat nor does 2016 Prelim defeat = Final defeat

    AAHP remains strong and unified with same Legal/Economic Defense Team

    3 out of the 5 current commissioners voted negative in the 2012 case

  • The Bottom Line

    Disruptions- Dramatic disruptions in supply and increased cost on both imported and domestic plywood products

    Long Lasting - If the AAHP is unsuccessful in our ITC Defense efforts, there will be long lasting, negative effects on many businesses

    Made in America? More American Jobs at risk in downstream industries

    Finished Kitchen Cabinet Imports Positive FD will push some U.S. cabinet MFGS to move production

    offshore - eliminating US jobs - to ensure they retain market share, and remain competitive against non-dutiable RTA cabinets

    Consequences If we lose, case could help further grow a potentially dominant kitchen cabinet industry..IN CHINA

  • Take a leadership position in public opposition

    Have a key downstream customer quoted in a PR position piece

    Post our PR pieces on your websites

    Confidential affidavits from you or your largest customers

    Help us expand the Alliance make up

    Get actively involved and further educate & inform your customer base

    Donate financially to the AAHP

    Join the AAHP as a fully active member, or as an associate member, publicly or anonymously

    IWPA Members Active Participation Needed

  • What can interested companies do to

    help fight this case?

    Educate your congressmen & senators to stand up to the petitioners

    ITC Questionnaires - Your professional response to the questionnaires is nothing short of vital

    Remember

    At the ITC, its ONE for all, all for ONE

    The ITC has the final word

    Professional, Intelligent, Academics, Non-Partisan

    Represent our one chance to win this caseAgain

    CARPE DIEM

  • AAHP Informational Meetings

    Current AAHP Members will hold a meeting tomorrow from 12-1 PM

    Immediately following, the AAHP BOD welcomes non-members to attend an informational meeting w/ Lead Counsel, Jeff Grimson

    This meeting is designed to address specific questions about the case and discuss methods of involvement and support

    Both meeting will take place in the Bay View Room

    www.aahp-org.com

  • Questions and Answers