Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ORGANIZATION:
INAM EH44 1 CHhRT NO. :
I 2
MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
ALTERNATE CLEANERS TECHNICAL D A T A EXCHANGE
L O X COMPATIBILITY OF RESIDUES
NAME :
DATE :
AUGUST 1993
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
CONTENTS
Purpose
Background
P o t e n t i a l B e n e f i t s
Tes t Method
Tes t Procedure
Ambient Pressure Lox Impact Tes ter
P r e l i m i n a r y R e s u l t s Tables
P r e l i m i n a r y R e s u l t s Graphs
Complete Test Method D e s c r i p t i o n
P r e l i m i n a r y Conclus ions
MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER I NAME : I ORGANIZATION:
ALTERNATE CLEANERS TECHNICAL
LOX COMPATIBILITY OF RESIDUES C H A R T NO. : D A T A EXCHANGE
EDDIE D A V I S
AUGUST 1993 DATE :
I I
PURPOSE
Chal lenge t h e N o n v o l a t i l e Residue c o n t a m i n a t i o n l e v e l f o r LOX Systems e s t a b l i s h e d by MSFC-SPEC-164.
BACKGROUND
MSFC-SPEC-l64A, re leased i n 1970, a l l o w s a maximum ( N V R ) s u r f a c e con tamina t ion o f 1 .0 m i l l i g r a m s per square f o o t o f s u r f a c e area .
No fo rma l and e x h a u s t i v e s tudy has been conducted t o de termine t h e r e a l NVR c o n t a m i n a t i o n l e v e l t h a t w i l l p r e s e n t problems i n l o x systems.
Study was e s t a b l i s h e d i n A p r i l , 1992, a t t h e M a t e r i a l s Combustion Research F a c i l i t y t o address t h i s problem.
POTENTIAL BENEFITS
Determine t r u e accep tab le con tamina t ion l e v e l s f o r l o x systems.
Envi ronmenta l b e n e f i t i n more l i b e r a l c o n t a m i n a t i o n l e v e l s a l l o w use o f l e s s c l e a n i n g agents and perhaps i i f r i e n d l i e r i i ones.
Cost sav ings i n u s i n g l e s s c l e a n i n g agents and perhaps I1cheaperIi ones.
ORGANIZATION: NAME : MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
TEST METHOD
EH44
4 CHART NO. :
S e l e c t a v a r i e t y o f contaminants r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f those found i n l o x systems.
ALTERNATE CLEANERS TECHNICAL EDDIE D A V I S
LOX COMPATIBILITY OF RESIDUES AUGUST 1993 D A T A EXCHANGE DATE :
Those chosen were:
DC200 P o l y d i m e t h y l s i l o x a n e S i l i c o n e F l u i d Conoco HD Calcium Grease FS 1265 F l u o r o s i l i c o n e F l u i d Zinc Chromate Pr imer TT-P-1757 M e t h y l a c r y l a t e A c r y l i c Adhesive Neoprene Rubber Adhesive B u t y l Rubber Adhesive Machin ing O i l
S e l e c t a s o l v e n t r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f those used i n c l e a n i n g l o x systems.
Chosen were:
- Freon 113 - T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e
ORGANIZATION:
NASA EH44 CHART NO. :
5
MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
ALTERNATE CLEANERS TECHNICAL D A T A EXCHANGE
LOX C O M P A T I B I L I T Y OF RESIDUES
NAME :
EDDIE D A V I S DATE :
AUGUST 1993
TEST PROCEDURE
Test on t h e Ambient Mechanical Impact Tester by the procedures o f NHB8060.1C, Test 13A
D isso lve contaminant i n bes t s o l v e n t i n order t o p lace known d i s k
Place s o l u t i o n
weight o f contaminant on t e s t
on 11/16 i nch t e s t d i s k
A l l o w 30 minutes f o r s o l v e n t evapora t ion b e f o r e t e s t i n g
Lox impact t h r e s h o l d t e s t by q u a n t i t y impacted
Lox impact t h r e s h o l d t e s t by impact energy l e v e l
Lox impact t e s t on va r ious s u b s t r a t e m a t e r i a l s
__ ~
NAME : MARSHALL S P A C E F L I G H T CENTER 0 R G A N I Z A T I ON :
NASA - EH44 (.llr'\RT NO. :
6 _. -
ALTERNATE CLEANERS TECHNICAL D A T A EXCHANGE
LOX COMPATIBILITY OF RESIDUES
AMBIENT PRESSURE LOX I M P A C T TESTER
NOTES:
- Tes t d i s k i s 11 /16" d i ame t e r
- S t r i k e r p i n c o n t a c t s u r f a c e i s 1/211 d iameter
- Test r e s u l t s :
g i v e s 0 1 r e a c t ion
g i v e s 2 o r more r e a c t i ons
Pass - 20 drops
F a i l - 20 drops
EDDIE D A V I S I D A T E :
AUGUST 1993
Ambient Pressure Mechanical Impact Drop Weight Tester
ORGANIZATION:
EH44 C H A R T NO. :
7
MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
ALTERNATE CLEANERS TECHNICAL D A T A EXCHANGE
LOX COMPATIBILITY OF RESIDUES
NAME : 1 EDDIE D A V I S DATE : I AUGUST 1993
0 PRELIMINARY RESULTS TABLES
Conoco HD Calcium Grease ( T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e So lven t )
Quan t i t y Quan t i t y per Impact React ions / Impacted (mg) Sq . F t . (mg) Subst r a t e Energy Tests (Drops) ------------- ------------ --------- ----e- ------------
5.448 3 9 995 CRES 347 72 FtLb 14120 5.448 3,995 An AL 6061 72 19/20
2.750 2.592
1.587 1.587
0.529 0.529
0.344
0.053 0.053
2,017 CRES 347 72 1,901 An AL 6061 72
3 /20 17/20
1,164 CRES 347 72 2 /20 1 164 An AL 6061 72 14/20
388 CRES 347 72 388 An AL 6061 72
252 CRES 347 72
39 CRES 347 72 39 ". y* ' An AL ?6061 72
2 /23 9 /20
0 /20
0 / 2 0 1 /60
MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER OKGANIZATION:
DATE :
ALTERNATE CLEANERS TECHNICAL D A T A EXCHANGE
NAME :
8 __
PRELIMINARY RESULTS TABLES
DC200 (F reon 113 S o l v e n t )
LOX COMPATIBILITY OF RESIDUES AUGUST 1993
Q u a n t i t y Impacted (mg)
5.554 5.554
-------------
2.750 2.750
0.529 0.529
0.344 0.344
0.053 0.053
Q u a n t i t y per Sq. F t . (mg)
4,073 4,073
2,017 2,017
388 388
252 252
39 39
Subst r a t e
CRES 347 An AL 6061
---------
CRES 347 An AL 6061
CRES 347 An AL 6061
CRES 347 An AL 6061
CRES 347 An AL 6061
Impact Energy
72 F tLb 72
72 72
72 72
72 72
72 72
------ Reac t ions / Tests (Drops)
16/20 -------------
7 /20
16/20 13/20
5 /20 2 /20
2 / 2 1 0120
0120 0120
LOX COMPATIBILITY RESIDUE CONTAMINATION STUDY DC 200 (200 CST) SILICONE FLUID (CRES 347 SUBSTR),
Yo REACTIVITY 100
80
60
40
20
0
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
ENERGY LEVEL (ft-lbs)
IMPACT QUANTITY
-t 5.554 mg +2.75 mg 'Af 0.529 mg * 0.344 mg ->f- 0.053 mg
CURVE GRAPH
LOX COMPATIBILITY RESIDUE CONTAMINATION STUDY CONOCO HD CALCIUM GREASE (CRES 347 SUBSTR.)
% REACTIVITY
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
ENERGY LEVEL (ft-lbs)
IMPACT QUANTITY - 2.75 mg + 1.587 mg 0.529 mg * 0.344 mg 0.053 mg
CURVE GRAPH
LOX COMPATIBILITY RESIDUE CONTAMINATION STUDY CONOCO HD CALCIUM GREASE (ANODIZED DISK)
% REACTIVITY
35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 10 15 20 25 30
ENERGY LEVEL (ft-lbs)
IMPACT QUANTITY
2.592 mg + 1.587 mg 0.529 mg * 0.053 mg
CURVE GRAPH
LOX COMPATIBILITY RESIDUE CONTAMINATION STUDY
$p L
6
DC 200 (200 CST) SILICONE FLUID (ANODIZED DISK)
IMPACT QUANTITY
+ 5.554 mg +2.75 mg X 0.529 mg * 0.344 rng X 0.053 mg
Yo REACTIVITY
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 10
\ c
CURVE GRAPH
I
CHEMICAL SPECIES, LOX IMPACT SENSITIVITY RESEARCH (RESIDUE STUDY)
OBJECTIVE: To substantiate proposal for cleaning to a lesser degree than
MATERIALS (CONTAMINANTS): DC 200
is currently allowed by NASA.
FS 1265 Decanoic Acid (Capric Acid) Zinc Chromate Primer Adhesive Tape (Acrylic) Residue
Conoco HD Grease, Carbowax . Rubber
PLAN: EH32 will prepare solutions, contaminants in inert solvents, per our instructions, and provide us with quantity necessary to achieve proper amount per disk.
Each series of tests on these solutions will be run with the solutions applied to SS 347 inserts in standard aluminum cups, with the solutions in SS cups, and with the solutions applied to aluminum grease cups in standard aluminum cups. In addi- tion, some of the solutions will be applied to sulfuric acid annodized aluminum disks when these disks become available.
Begin with 5 mg/disk solution.
5 mg/disk: Not reactive - increase concentration to 10 mg/disk. Reactive - decrease concentration to 1 mg/disk.
tions. Reactive - decrease concentration to 7 mg/disk.
mg/disk. Reactive - decrease concentration to 6 mg/disk.
9 mg/disk: Not reactive - energy threshold 10 mg/disk solu- tion (see energy threshold section). Reactive - decrease concentration to 8 mg/disk,
8 mg/disk: Not reactive - energy threshold 9 mg/disk solu- tion (see energy threshold section). Reactive - energy threshold 8 mg/disk solution (see energy threshold section).
tion (see energy threshold section). Reactive - energy threshold 6 mg/disk solution (see energy threshold section).
10 mg/disk: Not reactive - hold testing for further instruc-
7 mg/disk: Not reactive - increase concentration to 9
6 mg/disk: Not reactive - energy threshold 7 mg/disk solu-
1 mg/disk: Not reactive - increase solution to 3.mg/disk. Reactive - decrease solution to 0.1 mg/disk.
3 mg/disk: Not reactive - increase solution to 4 mg/disk. Reactive - decrease solution to 2 mg/disk.
4 mg/disk: Not reactive - energy threshold 5 mg/disk solu- tion (see energy threshold section). Reactive - energy threshold 4 mg/disk solution (see energy threshold section).
2 mg/disk: Not reactive - energy threshold 3 mg/disk solu- tion (see energy threshold section). Reactive - energy threshold 2 mg/disk solution (see energy threshold section).
0.1 mg/disk: Not reactive - increase solution to 0.65 mg/disk, Reactive - energy threshold 0.1 mg/disk solution (see energy threshold section).
0.65 mg/disk: Not reactive - energy threshold 1 mg/disk solu-
Reactive - energy threshold 0.65 mg/disk solution (see energy threshold section).
-tion (see energy threshold section).
ENERGY THRESHOLDING TECHNIQUE: Perform energy thresholding only when i t is called out in the plan above. at 72 ft-lbs f o r each new solution. Failure at
Always begin
72 ft-lbs, go to 40 ft-lbs.
At 65 ft-lbs - fail go to 60 ft-lbs. At 55 ft-lbs - fail go to 45 ft-lbs,
pass go to 65 ft-lbs.
At 45 ft-lbs - pass go to 50 ft-lbs. At 40 ft-lbs - fail go to 15 ft-lbs,
pass go to 55 ft-lbs.
At 35 ft-lbs - fail go to 30 ft-lbs. At 25 ft-lbs - fail go to 20 ft-lbs,
pass go to 35 ft-lbs.
At 15 ft-lbs - fail go to 10 ft-lbs, pas6 go to 25 ft-lbs.
After approximate threshold level is obtained using this method, find definitive threshold level, using following thresholding method.
Begin testing 6 inches above the approximate threshold level. Fai lure at 6 inches above, subtract three inches from drop height and test again. Continue this process until two successive energy levels are found not reactive. The definitive threshold level is the higher of the two non-reactive levels.
c’
0 P G A N I ZAT I ON :
NASA EH44 C H A R T NO. :
9
NAME : MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
ALTERNATE CLEANERS TECHNICAL EDDIE D A V I S
L O X C O M P A T I B I L I T Y OF RESIDUES AUGUST 1993 D A T A EXCHANGE DATE :
- -
PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS
Contaminat ion l e v e l s o f 1 .0 mg/sq f t appear t o be t o o conserva t i ve .
Much more t e s t i n g i s needed be fo re t r u e conc lus ions can be drawn.