Alliance for I-69 Presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    1/17

    1

    CommunitiesWorking Togetherto Meet GrowingDemand & Bring

    An InterstateHighway to

    UnderservedRegions of Texas

    EncouragingCooperation andSeeking Solutions

    Since 1994

    July 2008

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    2/17

    2

    Who is the Alliance for I-69 Texas?Who is the Alliance for I-69 Texas?

    www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

    ission: Actively advocate theconstruction of an interstatehighway in Texas from

    Texarkana to the Lower RioGrande Valley and Laredo byupgrading existing highways

    where possible

    he Alliance is a 501 (c) (6) non-profit organization made up oflocal governments, economicdevelopment groups, port

    authorities and private-sectorassociate members

    Board Chairs ofAlliance for I-69 Texas

    John Thompson, Polk County Judge (Current)Robert Eckels, Former Harris County Judge (2004-2007)

    Helen R. Walker, Former Victoria County Judge (1998-2003)

    Louis Bronaugh, Former Mayor of Lufkin (1993-1998)

    TEXAS

    CORRIDOR

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    3/17

    History of I-69 Initiative

    Federal 1991 - Congress gave interstate

    designation to I-69 specifying a corridorthrough Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee,Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana andTexas

    1995 Funding of first feasibility study

    1999 -2008 Federal funding total for I-69 in Texas just over $60 million

    State 2002 TxDOT designates I-69 as one of

    four priority corridors

    2003 Alliance for I-69 supportslegislation to expand TxDOT authority to

    use alternative financing tools 2004 - 2005 Environmental scoping

    meetings

    2006 TxDOT issues request forqualifications from potentialComprehensive Development Agreement(CDA) partners

    2007 Draft Environmental ImpactStatement published on Tier 1

    3www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

    I-69 is aMulti-State

    Corridor

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    4/17

    Progress Made in 2008

    Transportation Commission

    appointed 24-member I-69Corridor Advisory Committee

    Commission adopted guidingprinciples:

    TxDOT to approve toll rates

    Only new lanes to be tolled

    No non-compete clauses

    Follow existing ROW whenpossible

    TxDOT recommended I-69 study

    area be confined to upgradeableexisting highways

    ZAI/ACS selected to createmaster development andfinancial plan for I-69 Texas anda specific plan for upgrading

    U.S. 77 south of Corpus Christi

    4www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

    TxDOTRecommendations

    Narrow Study Area toExisting US 59, US 84,US 77, US 281 and SH 44Upgradeable Corridors

    TxDOT POLICY: If additionaltravel lanes are added toexisting highways, only thenew lanes will have tolls.

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    5/17

    Zachry/ACS Proposal

    Anticipates $2.5 billion in near-

    term transportationconstruction projects in I-69vicinity

    Anticipates no fuel tax dollarsfor construction of US 77upgrades and other near-termprojects

    Identifies opportunities forlong-term improvementsincluding a total of 60 near,mid- and long-term possibleprojects (not all of which willgo forward)

    Anticipates multimodalsolutions to transportationchallenges

    ZAI/ACS will work with local

    communities to plan projectsthat are needed and viable.The Alliance will facilitate this 5www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    6/17

    ZAI Conceptual Plan for US 77

    Anticipates system financing of US

    77 improvements

    Other toll projects would generaterevenue to develop US 77

    CC Southside Mobility Corridor

    CC SH 358 managed lanes

    CC SH 286 managed lanes

    Driscoll bypass

    Riviera bypass

    5-Mile Spur Cameron County

    West Loop Cameron County

    Proposes no tolls on US 77 except

    on the relief routes at Driscoll andRiviera

    Proposes complete local andcounty government coordination

    Includes upgrading 110 miles to

    interstate standard to connect toInterstate 37 at Corpus Christi

    6www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    7/17

    Why is I-69 Needed: Texas is Growing

    The Texas population is growing at morethan 1,000 people each day

    Texas population:

    1980 - 14.2 million

    2006 23.5 million

    2025 More than 30 million (est)

    Strong growth along I-69 corridor:

    Percent Growth Since 2000 Census

    27% - McAllen-Edinburg SMA

    18% - Brownsville-Harlingen SMA

    23% - Laredo SMA

    18% - Houston-Sugar Land SMA

    13% - Polk County

    7% - Nacogdoches County

    6% - Longview-Marshall SMA

    5% - Texarkana SMA

    Texas has created 1.6 million new jobsin the past 10 years

    7www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

    The Texas Data Center and the Office of the

    State Demographer project that the Texas

    population will increase by 71.5% from 2000

    to 2040, from 20.9 million to 35.8 millionpeople. Source: Texas State Data Center

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    8/17

    Ready or Not, Freight is Coming (andReady or Not, Freight is Coming (andGoing)Going)

    The I-69 corridor is already a major

    freight corridor.

    Rail & truck traffic will increase in Texaswhether or not we build newtransportation capacity.

    Texas gained 36,000 new manufacturing

    jobs since 2004. Increasedmanufacturing means more freight.

    Texas leads the nation in exports.Imports and exports are doubling every10 years.

    Panama Canal expansion will change

    world freight flow patterns, increasingthe amount of goods movement on

    Texas highways and railroads.

    8www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    9/17

    ZAIs Proposed Freight Shuttle SystemZAIs Proposed Freight Shuttle System

    9www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

    Containers or Trailers

    Improving the Supply Chain Elevated Guideways in

    Existing Right-of-Way

    Universal Shuttle

    Drive-on/Drive-off loadingof rotating cargo bay

    16 feet

    20 feet

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    10/1710www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

    ConceptualRouting ofInitial FreightShuttle

    Network inZAI Proposal

    San Antonio

    Dallas

    Houston

    CorpusChristi

    Harlingen

    Laredo

    VictoriaFreeport

    TexasCity

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    11/17

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    12/17

    New Highways Bring New Jobs & TaxBase

    SH 130 Case Study Williamson

    & Travis Counties Orthopeutics LP moves its spinal treatment

    company from San Diego, CA, toGeorgetown

    Joe Vining of Round Rock EDC reports their11 miles stretch of SH 130 has put them in

    the hunt for several companies currentlylocated in San Jose, CA

    Atlantic Coast Developers LLC brings amixed use project to SH 130 including 1.45million sq.ft. of office, hotels,entertainment and apartments

    Endeavor Real Estate Group LLC is putting

    in 2.3 million sq.ft. of retail, multi-family,office space and a hotel at SH 130 and US290

    Retail West Properties is building 1.4million sq.ft. of retail space and 1,200residential units on the corridor

    SCC Development Co. and EastborneInvestments Ltd, both NY developers, areputting in 1 million sq.ft. of retail at SH

    12www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

    Georgetown

    HuttoRound Rock

    Manor

    Pflugerville

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    13/17

    Doing Nothing is Not an Option

    13www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    14/17

    Project FundingProject Funding

    14

    10 years ago the Texas portion of I-69 was

    estimated to be a $6 billion project. Todaythe estimate is $12 to $15 billion due toinflation in construction materials, fuel andenvironmental regulation.

    Since 1991 federal funding for the multi-state 1,700-mile I-69 corridor has been $300

    million. The Texas portion of federal fundinghas been $60 million.

    The State has invested about $48 million inthe I-69 environmental review process.

    Federal and state funding of ongoing studies

    has been critical to bringing us to nearcompletion of the Tier 1 EIS process.

    The current cost of interstate highwayconstruction is in excess of $30 million permile. Additional tools and funding sourcesfrom both Washington and Austin are needed

    as we approach actual design andconstruction of I-69 in Texas.

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    15/17

    What I-69 Needs From WashingtonWhat I-69 Needs From Washington

    Over the history of the project, I-69 has

    consistently received support to advancedevelopment

    Designation as high priority corridor

    Included in Environmental Streamlining ExecutiveOrder

    Designated Corridor of the Future

    Consistent annual federal funding

    As we move toward I-69 construction we needto:

    Capitalize on the toll pilot project programincluded in SAFETEA-LU to enhance the ability ofTexas to attract project funding

    Define the Corridor of the Future Program toserve as a template for dedicated funding

    Use the opportunity of the next federaltransportation reauthorization bill to advance I-69through funding flexibility and creative financingprovisions

    Further reduce the donor/donee disparity againstTexas

    15www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    16/17

    What I-69 Needs From AustinWhat I-69 Needs From Austin

    16

    The Alliance for I-69 Texas supported HB 3588 in

    2003, HB 2702 in 2005 and SB 792 in 2007 in orderto create and preserve the tools needed to build I-69

    As we move toward I-69 construction we need to:

    Reverse the diversions from Fund 6 for purposes otherthan construction and maintenance

    Index the state fuels tax to continue adequatemaintenance of the existing highway system

    Pass enabling legislation allowing TxDOT to utilize aportion of the $5 billion Prop 12 general revenue bondon projects in the I-69 corridor

    Preserve the tools already provided by the Legislatureincluding bonding, tolls and private equity participation

    The Alliance supports:

    Tolling for new capacity only

    Use of existing right of way wherever possible on I-69

    Dedicated freight components, such as freight shuttle,that separate freight movers from passenger vehicles

    Comprehensive Development Agreements (CDAs) forprivate equity

    www.I69texas.orgwww.I69texas.org

  • 8/14/2019 Alliance for I-69 Presentation

    17/1717

    Alliance Board Members for 2008Alliance Board Members for 2008

    NORTHEASTCharles Thomas, Carthage Economic Development Corp.

    Alliance Executive Committee MemberBrenda Samford, Carthage City Manager

    Ed Smith, Mayor of Marshall

    James Carlow, County Judge, Bowie County

    James Greer, County Commissioner, Harrison County

    David Anderson, County Judge, Panola County

    EASTJohn Thompson, County Judge, Polk County

    Alliance Board Chair

    Jack Gorden Jr., Mayor of Lufkin

    Alliance Executive Committee MemberJim Jeffers, Nacogdoches City Manager

    Brad Browder, Cleveland Economic Development Corp.

    John Windham, Mayor of Center

    NORTH CENTRALJim Edmonds, Chairman, Port of Houston Authority

    Alliance 2ndVice Chair

    Jeff Moseley, President, Greater Houston Partnership

    Ben White, Mayor of College Station

    Norman Brown, County Commissioner, Liberty County

    CENTRALBillie Jones, Wharton Chamber of Commerce

    Buck Boettcher, Mayor of East Bernard

    Mickey Reynolds, County Commissioner, Wharton County

    Perri DArmond, Greater Fort Bend Economic Development Council

    COASTAL BENDJudy Hawley, Commissioner, Port of Corpus Christi Authority

    Alliance 3rdVice ChairLoyd Neal, County Judge, Nueces County

    Terry Simpson, County Judge, San Patricio CountyTom Niskala, Corpus Christi MPO & Chamber of Commerce

    Nelda Martinez, Council Member, Corpus Christi

    Berdon Lawrence, South Texas Property Owners Assn.

    EAST SPUR SOUTH TEXASBill Summers, President, Rio Grande Valley Partnership

    Alliance Vice Chair

    J. D. Salinas, County Judge, Hidalgo County

    Pete Sepulveda, International Bridge System, Cameron CountyAlan Johnson, Texas State Bank, Harlingen

    Ben Medina, Planning Director, City of Brownsville

    Pat Townsend, Mission Economic Development Corp.

    Mike Allen, McAllen Economic Development Corp.

    WEST SPUR SOUTH TEXASJ. Jorge Verduzco, International Bank of Commerce, Laredo

    Alliance Secretary/Treasurer

    Danny Valdez, County Judge, Webb County

    Harold Gleinser, County Judge, Goliad County

    Raul Salinas, Mayor of LaredoDavid Silva, County Judge, Bee County

    Ray Miller, Victoria MPO

    Ex-Officio Members

    Louis Bronaugh

    Helen Walker

    Robert Eckels

    Michael Behrens

    July 2008