Akamai - State of Art Intenet 2011 Volume 4 Part 2

8/3/2019 Akamai - State of Art Intenet 2011 Volume 4 Part 2

1/46

Volume 4, Number 2

2Nd Quarter, 2011 report

INcludes INsIght oN mobIle traIc aNd coNNected deVIces rom erIcssoN

t s Inn


2/46

Get the most out o theState te Internet with

our new Data Visualizationwww.ki./inn

Viw n v i ky i

100 ni/in w u.s.

c n

i

sv & in

iz


3/46

l ei

Wi iin i iin State of the Internet, w v

kn k y iniv. W nw iin

in in ai pi-i nn w viy

i , w e-i nn, wi

n viy n kn i n i wn. by inin niq

in n uni s n ni wiin e n ai

pi in, w n iy n inin n i

i in, w nin iy i

i.

t viizin n in njnin wi 1 Q, 2011 , vi www.akamai.com/

stateotheinternet, n in n q. a n q, w

i, i , n i in, n n n n wn

i . In iin, w v -v uni s viizin

, n w nn i in .

unny, Inn iin n ivi n ii n nin y

vnn in mi e. In i q , w k i iin Inn nniv-

iy in syi in y Jn.

siy n Inn n W nin i, n i n ssl v viy in

iny . ti q, i, wv in aki nn ivy

nwk xin n iiin i y W in in , kin j w

w--v nnin .

W xi n in aki n ein in i q , y vi

ini in n n i vi n v nn

vi n.

In in 3 Q, 2011 , w wi nin k w Ipv6 Inn,

w xinin Inn iin, n iy- n i- i.

dvi bn


4/46

4 2011 aki tni, In. a ri rv

t cnn

ExEcutivE Summary 5

SEction 1: SEcurity 6

1.1 ak trf, t oriinin cnri 6

1.2 ak trf, t pr 61.3 ssl Ini, cin-si cir 7

SEction 2: intErnEt PEnEtration 9

2.1 uniq Ipv4 ar 9

2.2 Ipv4 ar s exin u 10

2.3 Wr Ipv6 dy 10

SEction 3: GEoGraPhy Global 12

3.1: g avr cnnin s 12

3.2: g avr cnnin s, ciy Viw 13

3.3: g avr pk cnnin s 15

3.4 g avr pk cnnin s, ciy Viw 16

3.5 g hi brn cnniviy 18

3.6 g brn cnniviy 193.7 g Nrrwn cnniviy 20

SEction 4: GEoGraPhy unitEd StatES 21

4.1 uni s avr cnnin s 21

4.2 uni s avr cnnin s, ciy Viw 22

4.3 uni s avr pk cnnin s 22

4.4 uni s avr pk cnnin s, ciy Viw 23

4.5 uni s hi brn cnniviy 23

4.6 uni s brn cnniviy 24

4.7 uni s Nrrwn cnniviy 25

SEction 5: GEoGraPhy aSia Pacific rEGion 26

5.1 ai pif avr cnnin s 26

5.2 ai pif avr cnnin s, ciy Viw 26

5.3 ai pif avr pk cnnin s 27

5.4 ai pif avr pk cnnin s, ciy Viw 27

5.5 ai pif hi brn cnniviy 28

5.6 ai pif brn cnniviy 28

5.7 ai pif Nrrwn cnniviy 29

SEction 6: GEoGraPhy EuroPE 30

6.1 er avr cnnin s 30

6.2 er avr cnnin s, ciy Viw 31

6.3 er avr pk cnnin s 31

6.4 er avr pk cnnin s, ciy Viw 32

6.5 er hi brn cnniviy 32

6.6 er brn cnniviy 33

6.7 er Nrrwn cnniviy 34

SEction 7: mobilE connEctivity 35

7.1 ak trf r mi Nwrk, t oriinin cnri 35

7.2 ak trf r mi Nwrk, t pr 36

7.3 cnnin s & d cnin on mi Nwrk 37

7.4 mi trf grw a orv y erin 40

7.5 srn u a orv y erin 40

SEction 8: nEtwork outaGES and diSruPtionS 43

SEction 9: aPPEndix 44

SEction 10: EndnotES 45


5/46


aki y ii nwk v w iv n

inin n ny i, inin nnin , k , n nwk

nniviy/viiiy/ny , w n n in W i. eq, aki i s Inn . ti in

aki Inin Inn p in n q 2011

k , n in, n i nniviy, w n n in i

v i. In iin, i q in ini in Ipv4 xin,

i W Ipv6 dy, in-i ssl, n n n

v y aki n ein.

Security

din n q 2011, aki v k

iinin 192 niq ni/in n

w. tiwn w k , nin

10% v k in . myn n

uni s n n i , ivy,

nin j v 17% v k -

in. ak nnin in nin wi

q, wi 10 in 64% v

k . Wi n , p 80 (WWW)

in vy , iy n k

iinin myn. rviwin

v v y n in-i ssl i, w n

ssl in n v

i i, n w n i, ivn

y in n W w n

nyin niq.

Internet and Broadband Adoption

aki v 3.4% in ( q

2011) y in n niq Ipv4

nnin aki nwk, win v 604 iin.

lkin nnin , v nnin

w 2.6 m, n v k nnin

w 11.4 m. a ny/in v, s K

i v nnin , 13.8 m, n

hn Kn i v k nnin ,

44.4 m. a iy v, ii in Jn n s K

nin ny in nkin

i v n v k nnin . gy,

i n (>5 m) in w 27% in -

n q, n Nn i v i

n in, 68%. bn (>2 m) in

in 65% y, wi bi in i

v n in. Nwn (


6/46


sectIoN 1:siy

1.1 Attack Trafc, Top Originating Countries

din n q 2011, aki v k

iinin 192 niq ni/in, wn

199 in q 2011. a wn in i 1,

myn in n 10 i n niv

q, i n i q. ey

n 10 i in in

q 2010, n Inni k i n n

i in n y. an ni/in

qny n n 10 i, tiwn, cin, bzi, n

rni w ni i n k

i q, wi uni s, ri,

n Ini w i n in q-v-q.

Wn myn n i k

in q, i w n w i w

iy n-q ny, w k w

i n i i. t

, k myn nin i

n p 80 n 443 in n q. o k

myn, 60% p 80, n inin

40% p 443 in , ny v

k in p 80 y myn. p

80 w v k 10 i

nw Inni, nin 66% k.

t ninn iiin k w vy ii

v in q 2011, wi 47%

v k in ai pi/oni

in, 30% e, 20% ai, n

inin 3% ni in ai.

1.2 Attack Trafc, Top Ports

ak nnin n 10 iniy i q, wi 10 nin

70% v k ( 65% in q).

p 445 in i, niiny, n

n k in p 80 n 443 in

nin wi q 2011, wn in i 2.

t n v k in p 25 (smtp)

n p 21 (tp) in n in n q

10 i, wi p 3389 (mi tin

svi) n p 4899 (r aini)

q i.

a n v, ny k in p 80

myn, wi Inni, ri n uni s

w i n . sii p 80, v

k in p 1433 (mi sQl sv) w iy

nn, wi ny 70% in cin. an

in, v y k iinin in

aki inin ii n y Inn ni

k . b n y n, aki i iniy

ni wi k iin, w y k. (p nwk y ini.) ti in vi ini in

k , v n y aki, in n q 2011.

Figure 1: Attack Trafc, Top Originating Countries/Regions

1 Taiwan 10% 9.1%

2 Myanmar 9.1% 13%3 United States 8.3% 10%

4 China 7.8% 6.4%

5 Russia 7.5% 7.7%

6 Indonesia 7.4% 2.2%

7 Brazil 5.6% 5.5%

8 India 2.7% 3.8%

9 Egypt 2.7% 1.3%

10 Romania 2.7% 2.5%

Other 36% 36%

Q1 11 %Q2 11 % TrafcCuntry/Regin

3

10

5

7

48

29

1

6


7/46


cin in in q, iky iniin

ninin iviy n i y -

in n mi iin wk w

xi inin w

n.

In viwin n q v k

ny n y i/iv iy in

( n n), w n vn i 10 in aki 10 i w,

n iiin w ininy in. Ny,

i ny w i nnin k in

p 139 (NbIos), n i 10 i in p 5900

(Vi Nwk c), p 27977 (sk5 pxy), n

p 9988 (sw eni s http sv). In iin,

n nyi w ini y ny

w cnk/dwn/Ki w i i

n yin i i y nin

n p 445

i wiin State o the Internet.

1.3 SSL Insight, Client-Side Ciphers

In iin iv n q nn

aki vi v http (p 80), aki Inin

Inn p vi iin q n

nn v https/ssl (p 443). c

aki s cnn divy vi in in i

nwkin vi, nni vi ni, -

i, w & ss vi, n i ni.

ti iv v ssl-ny vi aki

wi niq iv n in-i ssl i

in , w i n v i. t ii

n in i in sslv3 n tlsv1.

an ssl i i n nyin i (yi nin)

, in inin wi n xn ky, i

iv ny nnin wn w nwk -

, wi k i nin n niinkin v i nnin.1 a yi nin,

ssl i n ny , n ky

i vy in iz n xiy, wi ky ( i)

in v iy. t ny ssl

i i riv ci 4 (rc4), d enyin sn-

(des), n avn enyin sn (aes). aes i

ni i i i ny-

in ky, n i i iy i n n i -

v y uni s Nin siy any (Nsa)

inin.2 aiiny, ssl n i m-

aniin c (mac) ny mdi, k, i vi iniy

n v i ii in. t

n mac i md5, s h ai (sha,

sha-1), n sha-2 ( wi sha-256 i ).

In , vnn n iny in y iy

i i n/ mac. inn, Ips-

140-23 n i des n aes, n Ips-1864

i sha-1 sha-256. (hwv, i-

in sha-256.) hIpaa in (vnin ivy

HTTPS/SSL 4.6%

Telnet 5.7%

Microsot SQL Server 2.6%

SSH 1.9%

RemoteAdministrator 0.8%

Microsot-RPC1.7%

Microsot TerminalServices 1.2%

NetBIOS 1.2%

Figure 2: Attack Trafc, Top Ports

445 Microsot-DS 39% 34%

80 WWW (HTTP) 11% 11%23 Telnet 5.7% 4.1%

443 HTTPS/SSL 4.6% 4.7%

1433 Microsot SQL Server 2.6% 1.7%

22 SSH 1.9% 3.3%

135 Microsot-RPC 1.7% 1.5%

3389 Microsot Terminal Services 1.2% 0.9%

139 NetBIOS 1.2% 1.0%

4899 Remote Administrator 0.8% 0.7%

Various Other 30%

Q1 11 %Q2 11 % TrafcPrt UsePrt

Microsot-DS39%

Other30%

WWW11%


8/46


sectIoN 1:siy (nin)

inin) iy n yy,

in dn h n

hn svi y, in n, u Ips-140.5

i 3 vi ii iv n ssl i

n y W in (ny w) aki

s cnn divy Nwk innin 2009

n n q 2011. In xinin

, v ky n iy n:

u aes 128-sha-1 ny i v 10 q

u rc4-md5-128 in y w-i v

10 q

Inin n, w n

i, w n ssl in

n v i i, n w

n i, ivn y i in w

n iiy i nw w, n n in in

n pcI n Ips i i. Wi

rc4-md5-128 in, i i i n -

n v k in iy iny

ny. hwv, xin n n in i 3

n n w y, w iv rc4-

i wi nin in, in n-z v.

exinin ssl i n i v, i 4

i i n y aki s cnn divy

Nwk in n q 2011. Wi

i v i n, in n

des-, rc4-, n Idea- i n mac i.

hwv, w i/mac inin w n

y , in n, ni .

sii n- n i v, y n

in n q, rc4 i nin

in, wi aes i nin in.

aiiny, w w n des-cbc3-sha-168

( knwn i des) in , i inin w

y y aes i y wiy

in W w n in w.

c n i wk i i y in

aki s cnn divy nwk, aki n n-

i nnin wk i n n v

w in q i i iiy

i y, i n /

W w. by nin i wk

i, aki i vi in iy

- i n in-ii iin.

aiin inin n aki siy sin, inin

wi x aki iy iii, n

n www.akamai.com/security.

Figure 3: Client Side SSL Ciphers Observed By Akamai, Q1 09 Q2 11

2/1/2009

4/1/2009

6/1/2009

8/1/2009

10/1/2009

12/1/2009

2/1/2010

4/1/2010

6/1/2010

8/1/2010

10/1/2010

12/1/2010

2/1/2011

4/1/2011

6/1/2011

RC4-MD5-128AES128-SHA-1

AES256-SHA-1 DES-CBC3-SHA-168

EXP-DES-CBC-SHA-40

RC4-SHA-128

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

4/1/2011

4/8/2011

4/15/2011

4/22/2011

4/29/2011

5/6/2011

5/13/2011

5/20/2011

5/27/2011

6/3/2011

6/10/2011

6/17/2011

6/24/2011

AES256-SHA-1

AES128-SHA-1

DES-CBC3-SHA-168

RC4-SHA-128

RC4-MD5-128

Figure 4: Client Side SSL Ciphers Observed By Akamai, Q2 2011


9/46


2.1 Unique IPv4 Addresses

t y-y v nwk, n y vi

n n iin q W nn i

vi n iy i, aki niq viiiiy in v

Inn nin n w. In n q-

2011, v 604 iin niq Ip , 238

ni/in nn aki nwk 3.4%

Ip n in q 2011, n 21%

n in n q 2010. a w

n 600 iin niq Ip , aki iv

w w v n iin W . ti i , in

, i inivi y n y in

Ip ( n Ip ), y

W w xy v. cnvy,

inivi n v i Ip i wi

, i i nn vi.

a wn in i 5, 10 ni w qy

in in i niq Ip n, wi bzi 9%

in . t uni s n g-

ny w w v w n 10,

inin n n n v i q. gy,

n ni/in wi n 25,000 niq

Ip kin q aki in q,

110 w qy w, wi j 24 w qy

in. y-v-y iv, uni s n

n w ny w ni n 10 w

w w 10% k. cin in 9.2% i q,

yy n in uni s n win

v v q, i 18% in i

q 2010. cin y-v-y w in n-

in wi q, 27%. gy, n ni/

in wi n 25,000 niq Ip kin

q aki in q, 130 w yy w,

wi ny g, sin n mnn xin-

in yy in in i niq Ip n. (c

in nn.)

t niq Ip n 10 ni

n j v 68% , nnin

v y nin wi i q. In kin

n i, w 186 ni/in wi w

n n iin niq Ip nnin aki

in n q 2011, 134 wi w n 100,000

niq Ip , n 33 wi w n 1,000 niq Ip

. ony -1,000 n in

i q.

sectIoN 2:Inn pnin

Figure 5: Unique IPv4 Addresses Seen By Akamai

Global 604,578,592 3.4% 21%

1 United States 143,487,908 0.6% 9.2%

2 China 76,441,611 3.9% 27%

3 Japan 44,816,252 8.7% 29%

4 Germany 34,785,032 0.4% 12%

5 France 24,312,469 1.3% 6.9%

6 South Korea 23,104,975 3.5% 15%

7 United Kingdom 22,843,333 1.4% 36%

8 Brazil 15,427,943 9.0% 29%

9 Italy 14,370,098 5.4% 32%

10 Spain 13,136,538 1.7% 15%

YYCange

QQCange

Q2 11 UniqueIP Addresses

Cuntry/Regin4

8

2

3

610

5

7

1

9


10/46


2.2 IPv4 Address Space Exhaustion Update

a n in q State o the Internet,

Inn ain N aiy x i inin

Ipv4 k n y 3, 2011, ii-

in inin v /8 k (iin 16.8 iin Ip

k) v rin Inn rii

(rIr). on ai 15, 2011, apNIc ( rIr ai pi

rin) i n /8 Ipv4 k, in i

in iy , n wi nw

xiin apNIc n i ny ii q n

iv in in xi 1,024

( /22) apNIc Ipv4 , in

q i ii.

In n i i ininxin, n i inin iy ,

n in/inn Ipv4 in

apNIc in, w i w inin

n Ipv4 /in y apNIc in

2010 n 2011.6 din

2010, v 53 iin Ipv4 w /in

y apNIc, wi v 26 iin in n q.

In n, in 2011, ny 105 iin Ipv4

w /in y apNIc, wi 18

iin in n q. a i i y i 6,

n Ipv4 in 2010, w v n ik,

inin in n q. hwv, wi

inin xin vi Ipv4 iy

in, i i vy in in

2011, wi n viy iv in

q (wi v 9 iin Ipv4 /in

n y 28, inin 8.4 iin Jn). din n

q, , i iy y n

ik n ai 12, in/inn n ny

fin iy in n ai 15, wi

j n Ipv4 /in y.

2.3 World IPv6 Day

on Jn 8, 2011 W i n Inn vi vi

n w jin wi n 1,000 -

iiin W i in W Ipv6 dy -

i Ipv6.7 oniz y Inn siy, in

24- fi Ipv6 n j W

i n w w-iin v Ipv6-n Inn, nin i nin xnni w.

W Ipv6 dy iin iv -

nizin iny Inn vi vi, w

n, in y vn n w ni

i vi niin. a ky W Ipv6

dy w x ni i wi -w Ipv6 n

n niin. givn iviy ny w

Inn, n i w i iniy

nn . ain iny , v j-

iy w vi . i 7 w

i i , in, n W Ipv6 dy

n W Ipv6 dy iin w -

(vi http) v Ipv6.8 a n in , k y

92-93% w n in y.

sectIoN 2:Inn pnin (nin)

0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

2011

January February March April May June

2010

IPv4Addresses

Figure 6: IPv4 Addresses Allocated/Assigned by APNIC, 1H 2010 & 2011


11/46


aki ii in W Ipv6 dy, nin Ipv6

www.ki., w n 50 W i

nin v 20 ni . In iin,

viizin w v nin aki W

Ipv6 dy , n vi www.akamai.com/ipv6.

a wn in i 8, viizin vi ini

in v Ipv6 n aki nwk, w

n ny n k v Ipv6 wn

in n w. din W Ipv6 dy, Ipv6 n

aki nwk i k y i , 12:30

gmt, n n wn 250-350 i n

n y. ov 280,000 niq Ipv6 nn q aki v y, wi

y v 6,9 wi in ,

n Inn svi pvi. a n q,

xiy 40% w v niv Ipv6 nnin, wi

inin 10% i 6410 (~9%) n t11 (~1%).

a aki Ipv6 in i

v nx v q, w wi nv in

in State of the Internet n Ipv6 in n

nyi Ipv6 q , n iv y, aki

nwk. aki nn Ipv6 nnn in n k vn i n, i

viiiy Ipv6 ivy wi kin inin n

i iin in. an Ipv6- wi i

y aki, ni IPv6: What the Transition Means for Content

and Application Delivery, ii win n

in Ipv6, n nn vi wi

in niinin Ipv6, n aki n Ipv6 -

wiin vi i. t wi i vi

www.akamai.com/ipv6.

Figure 7: Percentage o IPv6-reachable World IPv6 Day Participants

(Source: http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog52/presentations/

Monday/roberts-20110613-ISOC-WorldIPv6Day-NANOG52.pd)

100

75

50

25

0

June 7 June 8 June 9

%R

eachable

Figure 8: Akamais World IPv6 Day Data Visualization


12/46


sectIoN 3:gy g

t n wiin i in w in

n q 2011 aki y y

v nwk n in ni/in

n 25,000 niq Ip k q aki n-

wk in n q. (N 25,000 niq

Ip i inin n 1,000

niq Ip w 2008-2010

w iv i nw, i wi n -

ni in xy ni

wi ni.) iin in i

, n in w i nnin

n 2 m, n i n i nnin

5 m . In n i n n

n iin, nwn in -

w i nnin aki w n 256 k.

N n n f w iv

i q(). (t i, Q1 v 50% n Q2

v 51% w f 2% in.) a

q-v-q n i wn wiin in v

in w in n ii n n, n y-

v-y n wn i n- n.

a qniy hd-qiy i in v i, n

nin i in, n iky

qi v-inin n nwi. a nnin

2 m i y in n-niin

tV-qiy nn, n 5 m n-niin dVd

qiy vi nn, wi b-ry (1080) vi nn

xi vi i 40 m, in b-ry

aQ.13 In iin viin n v nnin ,

w nin v k nnin 14 n

w, ny/in, , n iy iv. ti i

n vi ini in k n iky x

i Inn nnin.

iny, knwn i nwk vi wi nyz

n viw in in ; i nwk

n v

i in n in.

3.1 Global Average Connection Speeds

a win ny 10% in q 2011,

v nnin n in w n inin q-y in, win 21% 2.6 m, wn in i 9. In

iin n qy w n v, v-

n ni/in wiin 10 w qy w

10% , wi lvi in in, 29%.

(Wi In qy w in q n i

cn 10, dnk w in n

q n i, in n, In 10

w n 8% q-v-q, In n

cn nw in in n n ivy.)

gy, v 80 ni/in w v nnin

in y 10% wiin n q wi ny in q. o ni/in qi

inin, vn w qy in, inin s K.

a ni/in wiin 10, w uni

s (in ixn) n 15 ni, inin v

nnin x i n

5 m.

by vi xiy n iin q W nn i vi n

iy i i y-y v nwk, aki niq v

viiiiy in nnin n- y n, nqny, in nin n . b aki in ii nwk ,

yin v wiin nwk, i n iv nn iy n niny

, in n niz i y n w yn

in n. inin n wy i i i, aki

How Will The Internet Scale? wi 12 vi xnin www.akamai.com/

whytheedge.


13/46


t v nnin w ininy y-

v-y w, inin 43%, ny v

yy w n in q. Yy w 10%

w n in i 10 ni, w

uni s, wi ny s K n rni in

y-v-y in. gy, y-v-y in in

v nnin w n in 128 ni/in,

wi yy w v 100% n in 17 ni, wi

n iin 102 w 10% v i y. c-

w n n n q 2010, n ny

vn ni w yy in, nin 0.1%

in rni 46% in in tnii.

din n q, 29 ni/in v

nnin 1 m . t w i w

lnn, 379 k. t q w ny, liy,

i n v n niq Ip kin q

aki in n q qiy inin.

3.2 Global Average Connection Speeds, City View

a w v n in vi iin State of theInternet, in xinin v nnin

iy v, w v i niq Ip

n (50,000 n y aki in n

q 2011) n i iniin (vin

knwn i nwk). a wi

in sin 3 i , knwn i nwk

n v w.

a wn in i 10, s Kn ii t n tjn

n i ii in n

q, wi v nnin 15.8 m. (siy

kin, t v nnin w j v 15.8

m, wi tjn w j w 15.8 m.) sn J 13.7

m v nnin uni s in

10 ii y i in i i

n k in State of the Internet in

i nwk n . bn, cz

ri w iy in e, wi n v nn-

in in n q 8.3 m. twny-nin ii

n 100 iv v nnin in x

10 m in n q, 13 ii in i

q in iin n w ny v

i in sin 3.1, i i v nnin

w inin in iy v w in

n q.

cii in ai n in in 100 i in n

q, in 71 n i, inin hn Kn,

n in ai, 10 in s K, n 59 in Jn. twny ii

N ai i, inin 18 in uni

s n w in cn. t inin nin ii w

i ni in e, wi ny swizn niin w

ni i.

In viwin i ny 900 ii qi

inin in i in, ii in i

in Jnn, s ai (ai), wi n v

nnin 1.7 m, n mn, anin (s

ai) wi n v nnin 3.7 m.

Figure 9: Average Measured Connection Speed by Country/Region

Global 2.6 21% 43%

1 South Korea 13.8 -4.2% -17%2 Hong Kong 10.3 12% 21%

3 Japan 8.9 10% 11%

4 Netherlands 8.5 14% 31%

5 Latvia 8.2 29% 31%

6 Czech Republic 7.4 13% 39%

7 Switzerland 7.3 17% 43%

8 Romania 6.8 2.3% -0.1%

9 Belgium 6.4 4.8% 22%

10 Denmark 6.4 13% 23%

12 United States 5.8 9.0% 26%

YY CangeQQ CangeQ2 11 Avg. MbpsCuntry/Regin

12

5

3

2

1

9

6

104

87


14/46


sectIoN 3:gy g(nin)

Figure 10: Average Connection Speed, Top Global Cities

1 South Korea Taegu 15.8

2 South Korea Taejon 15.83 Japan Shimotsuma 15.2

4 Japan Kanagawa 15.0

5 Japan Tokai 14.2

6 Japan Asahi 14.0

7 Japan Urawa 13.9

8 Japan Yokohama 13.7

9 United States San Jose, CA 13.7

10 South Korea Sangamdong 13.7

11 Japan Tochigi 13.4

12 Japan Hiroshima 13.0

13 South Korea Kimchon 12.9

14 South Korea Anyang 12.9

15 Japan Nagano 12.5

16 South Korea Seocho 12.3

17 Japan Ibaraki 12.1

18 Japan Shizuoka 12.0

19 Japan Toyonaka 11.6

20 South Korea Ilsan 11.5

21 Japan Nagoya 11.3

22 Japan Chiba 11.1

23 Japan Giu 10.7

24 South Korea Suwon 10.7

25 Japan Kyoto 10.6

26 Japan Kobe 10.4

27 Japan Osaka 10.4

28 South Korea Seoul 10.2

29 Japan Marunouchi 10.0

30 Japan Sendai 9.9

31 Japan Nara 9.9

32 Japan Hyogo 9.7

33 Japan Wakayama 9.6

34 Japan Fukuoka 9.5

35 Hong Kong Hong Kong 9.4

36 South Korea Yongsan 9.2

37 Japan Yokkaichi 9.2

38 Japan Tokyo 9.1

39 Japan Hakodate 9.1

40 Japan Otsu 9.041 Japan Fukushima 8.9

42 Japan Niho 8.8

43 Japan Matsuyama 8.8

44 Japan Tokushima 8.7

45 Japan Hamamatsu 8.7

46 Japan Niigata 8.7

47 Japan Kochi 8.6

48 Australia Canberra 8.6

49 Japan Soka 8.5

50 Japan Hodogaya 8.5

51 United States Fredericksburg, VA 8.5

52 Japan Okayama 8.553 Japan Fukui 8.3

54 Japan Yamagata 8.3

55 Czech Republic Brno 8.3

56 United States Monterey Park, CA 8.2

57 Japan Kumamoto 8.2

58 Japan Utsunomiya 8.2

59 Japan Saga 8.2

60 Japan Mito 8.2

61 Switzerland Geneva 8.2

62 Japan Kanazawa 8.2

63 United States Fremont, CA 8.2

64 Japan Aomori 8.2

65 Latvia Riga 8.1

66 Netherlands Amsterdam 8.1

67 Japan Kokuryo 8.1

68 Japan Miyazaki 8.0

69 Canada Oakville, ON 8.0

70 Japan Yosida 8.0

71 Japan Kou 7.9

72 Romania Constanta 7.9

73 Japan Yamaguchi 7.9

74 Switzerland Zurich 7.9

75 Japan Tottori 7.9

76 Japan Kagoshima 7.7

77 United States Staten Island, NY 7.6

78 United States Columbia, MD 7.5

79 United States Jersey City, NJ 7.5

80 United States Riverside, CA 7.5

81 United States Oakland, CA 7.5

82 Belgium Liege 7.4

83 Japan Nagasaki 7.3

84 United States Fairfeld, CA 7.3

85 United States Spartanburg, SC 7.3

86 United States Hayward, CA 7.3

87 United States San Mateo, CA 7.2

88 Austria Salzburg 7.2

89 Canada Victoria, BC 7.2

90 United States Federal Way, WA 7.291 United States Union, NJ 7.2

92 Japan Oita 7.1

93 Japan Sapporo 7.1

94 Japan Okidate 7.1

95 Portugal Porto 7.1

96 Japan Akita 7.1

97 United States Traverse City, MI 7.1

98 Japan Naha 7.0

99 United States Anaheim, CA 6.9

100 United States Santa Barbara, CA 6.9

Q2 11 Avg. Mbps Q2 11 Avg. MbpsCity CityCuntry/Regin Cuntry/Regin


15/46


3.3 Global Average Peak Connection Speeds

t v k nnin i n n

v xi nnin

niq Ip n y aki i

y. t v i in ii i

nniv xi nnin . In

n v nnin , v

k nnin i i niv Inn

nnin iy. (ti in iin -

in ni y in wiin

nwk y vi, in iv wn

.) N knwn i

nwk n v

i i.

a in 10 m i in q

2011, v nnin w n

q n w in n q, in

11 m, wn in i 11. Qy in w n

in nin 10 ni/in, wi w

n 10% n in ni/in. m qy

w w n in uni s, w v

k nnin w y 1 m i q.

lkin y-v-y n, v nnin

w y xiy w-i -

n q 2010. si w w n in nin

10 ni/in n uni s, wi ny s Kin i yy in. cninin i n i

w, v k nnin in uni a

ei (uae) w 265% y-v-y yy w in

uae w ny 400% in q.

hn Kn in ny/in wi i v

k nnin , 44.4 m. s K, rni,

n Jn v k nnin v 30

m. t inin ni in 10, w uni

s, w v k nnin v 20 m in

n q. gy, 12 iin ni/in v k nnin v 20 m, wi n

iin 46 x 10 m. gin-bi t-1 v 1.5

m v k nnin nk ny

w n qi niin.

Global 11.4 7.4% 67%

1 Hong Kong 44.4 12% 40%

2 South Korea 35.7 -1.5% -6.0%

3 Romania 33.7 2.9% 25%

4 Japan 31.6 5.5% 13%

5 Latvia 29.4 21% 47%

6 United Arab Emirates 26.8 3.5% 265%

7 Belgium 26.8 8.5% 41%

8 Portugal 26.2 5.2% 55%


10 Hungary 24.4 14% 72%

16 United States 22.1 4.3% 35%

YY CangeQQ CangeQ2 11 Peak MbpsCuntry/Regin

16

5

3

4

1

2

7

8

10 6

Figure 11: Average Peak Connection Speed by Country/Region

9


16/46


sectIoN 3:gy g(nin)

3.4 Global Average Peak Connection Speeds,

City View

a w v n in vi iin State of the

Internet, in xinin v k nnin

iy v, w v i niq Ip n

(50,000 n y aki in n q

2011) n i iniin (vin knwn

i nwk). a wi in sin

3 i , knwn i nwk n

v w.

a wn in i 12, i 10 ii wi

i v k nnin w in Jn, wi

v i ii in v k nnin

50 m v. t, s K j 150k 50 m, n jin tjn w ii

s K n 10. Inin t,

19 ii iv v k nnin

n 40 m in n q, wi n iin 50

v k nnin in x 30 m.

t inin 25 ii 100 v k

nnin v 20 m.

cii in ai pi in n in jiy

100 i i, wi 100 i in-

in 10 ii in s K, 58 ii in Jn, w hn

Kn n cn, ai. t en iy in

cnn, rni, n i w jin y vn en

ii, inin ti, rni, w w swiz-

n, n n cz ri, lvi, p,

n bi. In N ai, 22 ii uni s

100 i.

In viwin i ny 900 ii qi

inin in i in, ii in i

in cn, m (ai) wi n v k

nnin 13.8 m, n mn, anin (s

ai) wi n v k nnin 22.4 m.

A developing neighborhood in Toronto, Canada will oer

speeds o up to 10 gigabits a second or businesses or

100 megabits a second or residential use.[Source: http://reut.rs/qz12Wq]

Google announced that Kansas City, Kansas would be

the inaugural site or its Fiber or Communities program,

which it says will be capable o delivering Internet connec-

tions o 1 gigabit per second to as many as 500,000 people.

The service will initially be oered in early 2012.

[Source: http://bit.ly/pJer8t]

According to research published by Inorma Telecoms &

Media, South Korea and Japan both enjoy the astest broad-

band speeds in the world, and Inorma predicts that by 2015,

the Asia Pacifc region will account or 42% o global Internet

trafc by virtue o the sheer growth in user numbers that this

region will see over the next several years. [Source: http://bit.ly/qg7JTX]

DID YOU

KNOW?


17/46


Figure 12: Average Peak Connection Speed, Top Global Cities

1 South Korea Taejon 55.3

2 Japan Kanagawa 52.33 Japan Marunouchi 51.6

4 Japan Tokai 51.3

5 Japan Shimotsuma 50.8

6 Japan Nagano 50.0

7 South Korea Taegu 49.9

8 Japan Yokohama 49.8

9 Japan Urawa 49.3

10 Japan Asahi 46.9

11 Japan Hodogaya 46.0

12 Japan Chiba 45.3

13 Japan Tochigi 45.3

14 Romania Constanta 45.2

15 Japan Soka 43.8

16 Japan Hiroshima 43.2

17 Japan Shizuoka 42.4

18 South Korea Seocho 42.3

19 Japan Ibaraki 42.0

20 Hong Kong Hong Kong 41.6

21 South Korea Sangamdong 41.3

22 South Korea Anyang 41.3

23 South Korea Kimchon 40.9

24 South Korea Ilsan 40.6

25 Japan Nagoya 40.4

26 Japan Kokuryo 39.6

27 Romania Timisoara 38.8

28 South Korea Suwon 38.7

29 United States San Jose, CA 38.7

30 Japan Giu 38.7

31 Japan Kyoto 38.4

32 Japan Fukuoka 38.4

33 Japan Kobe 38.3

34 Japan Utsunomiya 38.2

35 Japan Mito 38.0

36 Japan Sendai 37.7

37 Japan Osaka 37.2

38 Japan Niigata 36.9

39 Japan Yosida 36.5

40 Japan Yokkaichi 35.741 South Korea Seoul 35.5

42 Japan Hakodate 35.5

43 United States North Bergen, NJ 35.4

44 United States Monterey Park, CA 35.2

45 Japan Niho 34.8

46 Japan Nara 34.6

47 Japan Otsu 34.3

48 Japan Wakayama 34.2

49 United States Staten Island, NY 33.8

50 Japan Kou 33.6

51 Australia Canberra 33.4

52 Japan Fukui 33.153 United States Fairfeld, CA 33.0

54 South Korea Yongsan 32.8

55 United States Hayward, CA 32.8

56 United States Fredericksburg, VA 32.6

57 Japan Hamamatsu 32.6

58 Japan Matsuyama 32.6

59 Japan Toyonaka 32.4

60 Japan Fukushima 32.3

61 Japan Yamagata 32.1

62 Japan Okayama 31.7

63 Japan Tokushima 31.6

64 United States Oakland, CA 31.5

65 Czech Republic Brno 31.4

66 Japan Sapporo 31.4

67 Japan Kanazawa 31.3

68 United States San Mateo, CA 31.2

69 United States Riverside, CA 31.2

70 United States Santa Barbara, CA 30.9

71 Japan Okidate 30.9

72 Japan Kochi 30.3

73 United States Fremont, CA 30.2

74 Japan Yamaguchi 30.2

75 United States Spartanburg, SC 30.1

76 United States Arvada, CO 29.9

77 Japan Kumamoto 29.9

78 Japan Tokyo 29.8

79 United States Aurora, CO 29.8

80 United States Union, NJ 29.8

81 United States Jersey City, NJ 29.8

82 United States Columbia, MD 29.6

83 Latvia Rigo 29.2

84 Japan Miyazaki 29.1

85 Portugal Porto 29.0

86 United States Cherry Hill, NJ 28.9

87 Japan Akita 28.7

88 Japan Hyogo 28.7

89 Switzerland Zurich 28.7

90 Japan Iwaki 28.591 United States Muncie, IN 28.2

92 Japan Naha 28.2

93 Japan Aomori 28.0

94 Japan Saga 28.0

95 United States Federal Way, WA 27.9

96 Japan Kagoshima 27.7

97 Japan Tottori 27.7

98 United States Traverse City, MI 27.2

99 Belgium Liege 26.9

100 Switzerland Geneva 26.3

Q2 11 Peak Mbps Q2 11 Peak MbpsCity CityCuntry/Regin Cuntry/Regin


18/46


3.5 Global High Broadband Connectivity

In n q 2011, v w in

i n in vn n, i in

11% q-v-q, wi 27% nnin ak-

i in 5 m . a wn in i

13, Nn k , wi n iiv 22%

qy in in i n in v in

ny 68%. ti w w n- hn

Kn, wi j y 60% in, vn wi ny 7%

qy w. s K, wi i in

q, k i , in i qy in.

an inin ni in 10, Jn w

ny ny xin qy in, in

i 0.1%. gw w n in inin n-

i in i, x rni, wi w iy

n n q-v-q. t uni s, nk

in y, w in j v 7%

n n q i n in

42%, kin 40% i.

on y-v-y i, i n in

w y j v 25%, n n yy w w n

in i 10 ni/in, w uni

s. on in, ny s K n Jn in y-

v-y, wi w in i in 10

n j 7.7% in rni swizn n -

in n q 2010, wi n in 107%.

a w, 22 ni/in w i -n n y-v-y, inin 561%

in n in anin n 391% w n in myi.

swn n Ini w ny w ni w

yy in, wi swn in 30% i n

in wi n 11% y-v-y , n Ini 14% yy

in 0.4% i n in .

lkin i n in n i, 10

ni/in n i nnin

aki in n q n 5 m

i i ix in q 2011, n n 2010. t w n iin 19 ni/in (n-

in wi i w q) w n q

nnin w i n , n 15 (wn

17 in i q) w n in 10 nnin

w n 5 m. o 59 ni/in qi

inin in i in, Ini n cin nin

ny w wi i n w 1% - Ini w

0.4%, n v, n cin w 0.6% in

in n q.

sectIoN 3:gy g(nin)

Figure 13: High Broadband Connectivity, Fastest Countries/Regions

Global 27% 11% 26%

1 Netherlands 68% 22% 40%

2 Hong Kong 59% 6.7% 27%

3 South Korea 58% -3.5% -22%

4 Belgium 57% 9.9% 43%

5 Latvia 56% 27% 30%

6 Japan 55% -0.1% -8.9%

7 Czech Republic 55% 13% 63%

8 Romania 52% 1.2% 7.7%

9 Denmark 52% 21% 39%

10 Switzerland 50% 25% 107%

13 United States 42% 7.3% 38%

YY CangeQQ Cange% Abve 5 MbpsCuntry/Regin

13

5

8

6

2

3

1

4

97

10


19/46


3.6 Global Broadband Connectivity

In n q 2010, n in

w nin w, inin 4.0% vi q,

65%. a wn in i 14, ni/in

n 10 90% i nnin

aki in v 2 m in n q.

e in y nn n n,

wi nin 10 ni hn Kn nin

in. di n v n v k nn-

in , ai pi ni/in nk in 30

n 40 y.

Nin 10 ni/in, w uni s,

n in w in n in q-

v-q lx w ny ny in 10 in. Qy w w , nin j

n 2% in swizn n hn Kn j v 4% in

Nn n lvi. gy, ni (m,

dinin ri, n pin) n i v

n in q 2011.

on y-v-y i, n in w 9.5%

j iy i n n in vi q.

an 10 ni/in, hny i yy

w , 13%, i w w y y rni (12%

yy w), gny, n lx ( 11% yy

w). t w yy w n 10 w inn in swizn, 3.9% yy w n

in q. Nn ni/in n 10

w y-v-y in in n in . gy,

16 ni n i v n -

in n q 2010, inin on nin

iv w v 1,700% m 137% in. In ,

on, dinin ri, n pin w ny

ni/in w n 1,000% y-v-y w

in n q.

In n q 2011, 19 ni/in ( 11in q) w n in v 90% .

an 43 ( 42 in q) i

nnin aki 2 m ; 13 iin ni/

in n in 25%, n n 8

ni/in n in n nnin aki

2 m. o ni/in qi

inin, Vnz n in w v n

in, 2.0%, i w 20% q.

Figure 14: Broadband Connectivity, Fast Countries/Regions

Global 65% 4.0% 10%

1 Bulgaria 97% 2.0% 6.3%

2 Czech Republic 95% 1.9% 8.2%

3 Romania 95% 2.4% 12%

4 Switzerland 95% 1.8% 3.9%

5 Netherlands 95% 4.1% 7.9%

6 Hungary 94% 3.3% 13%

7 Hong Kong 94% 1.8% 1.8%

8 Germany 94% 2.7% 11%

9 Latvia 92% 4.4% 3.0%

10 Luxembourg 92% -0.9% 11%

35 United States 80% 4.1% 11%

YY CangeQQ Cange% Abve 2 MbpsCuntry/Regin

35

3

1

7

10

64

8

5

2 9


20/46


sectIoN 3:gy g(nin)

3.7 Global Narrowband Connectivity

Wn n in inin w in

25,000 niq Ip in wi q ,

i iy n i ni qi in-

in in nwn in i, wi ni

in 10 v i y n

n ii. hwv, i i ni nw

in in n 10 i ivy , v

n n q 2011.

a wn in i 15, v nwn in

nin i i in, in 14% q-v-q,

j w 3% nnin aki

w 256 k. a 10 ni w q-

y in, nin 0.7% in Nii In 23%. t nin, y in ,

vy , - n w i nn-

iviy. In q 2011 , liy i n

10 i, wi iv 252% qy in. I w

i w w i-y vn-

n i Inn wn k in

q. W iv i w iky , in

n q, w n 100 niq Ip liy

q aki, n viw aki

in ny w i xy w v in

n q.

y-v-y iv, i 10 ni

w y yy in, iniin n- n w

i nniviy in ni. Ini n Kzkn

w ny w ni in 10 w y-v-y

in in nwn in. givn i w n-n

y-v-y n n q, wi ni

qy in, i nniviy iin in Ini

y ny ivin w wi nin w n

v in q. Kzkn 137% yy in i

iin, i in w n in -

ni, iy ny miniy cniin n

Inin nnn i inn iv 100% -

n in v y 2013, i nin p

n Inin n cniin tni dvn in

Kzkn 2010-2014, iin in v n

Kzkn 16 m y 2015.15

o ni/in qi inin in i in,

18 nwn in v w

2.9% n q 2011. o , w n-

wn in w 1%, wi n ninin inin

w v, 0.3%. aiiny, qiyin ni/-

in, ny ix w q-v-q in, n ny w

y-v-y in, i i n , y n

, nin iniiiv n w iv -

n nniviy vin iiv i.

Figure 15: Narrowband Connectivity, Slowest Countries/Regions

Global 2.9% -14% -37%

1 Lebanon 56% -7.5% -19%

2 Bolivia 46% -10% -30%

3 Uzbekistan 44% -18% -46%

4 Nigeria 40% -0.7% -30%

5 Nepal 35% -3.8% -42%

6 India 31% -12% 3.2%

7 Indonesia 31% -18% -13%

8 Iran 30% -23% -35%

9 Syria 19% -1.7% -30%

10 Kazakhstan 19% -4.6% 137%

27 United States 1.8% -7.8% -33%

YYCange

QQCange

% Bew256 kbps

Cuntry/Regin

271

4 8

72

9

3

56

10


21/46


t i n uni s n

sin 3 n j n i wiin in.

(t i in in nnin ini in nwkin uni s, n iin y aki es in .)

sectIoN 4:gy uni s

4.1 United States Average Connection Speeds

t n q 2011 w, i in n

y, dw n n in in nin,

n qy w in r In v v-

nnin 8.2 m, j iy d-

w 8.1 m v nnin , wn in i

16. Wi dw 21% qy in w iy

n, n 10 , Vn w 30% q-

v-q, n Nw hi, Viini, n Winn

w in x 10%. a w ny, 23 in

w qy in in x 10%, n w

qy in. In iin in 10, 27

v nnin in i n

(>5 m) n, n akn nk w ,

wi n v nnin 3.3 m.

yy iv, w w xy n wi

W Viini inin 10% -

n q 2010 W Viini ny w

3.8%. iv w n 40% y-v-y, n

nin w n 30%, n n iin 26 w

n 20%. I n w ny nin

i in y-v-y n i,

w n in ny in

w i w v yy w.

In May 2011, work began in Rhode Island on Beacon 2.0,

385 miles o new fber optic broadband inrastructure that will

reach nearly every city and town in the state. [Source: http://bo.st/orV95H]

DID YOU

KNOW?

Figure 16: Average Measured Connection Speed by State

1 Rhode Island 8.2 21% 34%2 Delaware 8.1 7.7% 12%

3 District O Columbia 7.5 6.9% 33%

4 Utah 7.0 4.9% 34%

5 Vermont 6.7 30% 28%

6 Caliornia 6.7 6.5% 28%

7 New Hampshire 6.6 11% 12%

8 Virginia 6.6 14% 41%

9 Washington 6.5 15% 27%

10 New York 6.4 9.2% 27%

YYCange

QQCange

Q2 11Avg. Mbps

State

23

1

57

4

10

8

9

6


22/46


sectIoN 4:gy uni s(nin)

4.2 United States Average Connection Speeds,

City View

a wi g av cnnin s, ciy Viw

n in sin 3.2, nnin knwn i n

i nwk w v nyin

i i, n 50,000 niq Ip w

i viw w.

a wn in i 17, sn J, ca i in

n q 13.7 m, vin i in

i q, nk n ny in ny

6 m q-v-q. t inin ii in

10 w qy in w, nn qi inin.

Wi i in y in

10 i, i i nin, ii j v w i v. a 10

ii v nnin in n q

x i n 5 m.

cii in cini in jiy n i,

kin ix 10 ( in ny in

q). cii n e c n ,

ii myn, Viini, Nw Jy, n Nw Yk.

sii v nnin i, i n

w ny nin i in

y-v-y n.

4.3 United States Average Peak Connection Speeds

cnin wi i iin wi i v

nnin , r In w wi i

v k nnin in n q. a wn in

i 18, r In 16% q-v-q w 31.3

m i dw, wi in

. r In jin dw ny w wi v

k nnin v 30 m.

an 10 , qy n w iiv,

nin Nw Yk 2.2% in r In 16%

in. a w ny, qy w w n in

43 , nin 0.2% in in minn ( 20.1 m)

19% in in Nw mxi ( 19.1 m). ei w

v k nnin in in n q n 0.8% in m ( 23.4 m) n 8.3%

in in N dk ( 17.7 m).

y-v-y iv, w n 10

w vy n, wi ny Nw hi in yy w

n 20%. N cin iiv yy in 56%

w n 10. a w ny, yy

w w n in . In n 62% in I

( 14.4 m) wn 12% in akn ( 11.6 m)

Figure 17: Average Measured Connection Speed, Top United

States Cities by Speed

1 San Jose, CA 13.7

2 Fredericksburg, VA 8.5

3 Monterey Park, CA 8.2

4 Fremont, CA 8.2

5 Staten Island, NY 7.6

6 Columbia, MD 7.5

7 Jersey City, NJ 7.5

8 Riverside, CA 7.5

9 Oakland, CA 7.5

10 Fairfeld, CA 7.3

Q2 11 Avg. MbpsCity


23/46


4.4 United States Average Peak Connection Speeds,

City View

cnin wi v nnin i, sn J,

cini i uni s ii wi

i v k nnin , wn in i 19.

I q-v-q n n

10 ii w ix in n q, sn J n mn-

y pk in n n i, wi N bn

n sn In in y w m . In n

wi 10 i q, nn ii i

q iv n v k nnin in x 40 m. hwv, 10 i w v

30 m i q, ny q.

cii in cini vn 10 i q,

wi e c ii (in Nw Jy, Nw Yk, n

Viini) nin i.

4.5 United States High Broadband Connectivity

In in wi iiv qy w n n

v n v k nnin uni

s, qy n n nin 10

i n in w iiv in n q.

(Ininy, m w nn q-v-

q.) sv w n w, wi r In,

Nw Yk, Vn, n Winn inin n

10%. a wn in i 20, dw in wi

i v i n in, w y

y r In. (hwv, i 74% in

nin.) a w ny, ny (min,

N dk, n cini) w i n in

q-v-q, in w

( 1.0%, 3.6%, n 3.7%, ivy). Q-

y w n i 1.3% in in u hwii

56% j.

a n q 2010, i n

in n 10 w n w,

wi in n in 10% . In , j n

10 , (r In, Nw Yk, Vn, n

Winn) w yy w in x 40%. Y-v-

y in w n in ny.

gw n j 2.2% in akn Nw mxi

n in i n in, inin 112% v

y.

Figure 18: Average Peak Connection Speed by State

1 Rhode Island 31.3 16% 46%

2 Delaware 30.8 2.5% 29%

3 District O Columbia 27.6 5.1% 39%

4 New York 25.6 2.2% 42%

5 Caliornia 25.3 4.5% 33%

6 Virginia 25.3 6.8% 47%

7 Vermont 24.7 15% 36%

8 North Carolina 24.2 9.1% 56%

9 New Hampshire 24.2 4.0% 14%

10 Maryland 23.5 5.0% 29%

YYCange

QQCange

Q2 11Peak Mbps

State

1

7

4

9

2

6

8

53

10

Figure 19: Average Peak Connection Speed, Top United States

Cities by Speed

1 San Jose, CA 38.7

2 North Bergen, NJ 35.4

3 Monterey Park, CA 35.2

4 Staten Island, NY 33.8

5 Fairfeld, CA 33.0

6 Hayward, CA 32.8

7 Fredericksburg, VA 32.6

8 Oakland, CA 31.5

9 San Mateo, CA 31.2

10 Riverside, CA 31.2

Q2 11 Peak MbpsCity


24/46


sectIoN 4:gy uni s(nin)

4.6 United States Broadband Connectivity

a i 21 i, n in n

10 ni nin w nin , wi q-

y in n nin 0.4% in dw

9.1% in Vn. Vn ivy n w

i nin wi n w n i

n i, wi dw in i

i xy i v n in. In n

q, hwii n cnni jin dw, Nw h-

i, n r In in vin n in

90% . a w ny, Iw w

v n in, 56%. Qy in w

n in w , wi myn in 1.9% ( 81%)

n mii in 6.5% ( 68%).

lkin y-v-y n, 10 w

n in v in n

q 2010, wi w nin j 0.3% in -

dw 16% in Vn. a w ny, mi-

i w ny yy in, n j y

, in 0.4%. Y-v-y w n 0.3% in

dw 41% in Wyin ( 69%). t vwiny

iiv n n uni s n

n i n in v in, n in,

in , iv i nniviy, n viiiy

(n nin ) i- Inn nnin.

Figure 21: Broadband Connectivity, Fast U.S. States

1 Delaware 98% 0.4% 0.3%

2 New Hampshire 94% 1.7% 4.0%

3 Rhode Island 94% 0.8% 5.4%

4 Hawaii 93% 3.4% 6.7%

5 Connecticut 90% 5.8% 7.0%

6 Vermont 88% 9.1% 16%

7 Nevada 86% 1.7% 4.3%

8 Maine 86% 1.8% 8.6%

9 Florida 85% 3.0% 10%

10 New York 85% 3.1% 8.1%

YYCange

QQCange

% Abve2 Mbps

State

1

35

82

4

10

6

7

9

Figure 20: High Broadband Connectivity, Fastest U.S. States

1 Delaware 74% 3.0% 11%

2 Rhode Island 74% 12% 40%

3 New Hampshire 63% 8.6% 20%

4 District O Columbia 56% 2.0% 28%

5 New Jersey 55% 6.3% 23%

6 Maryland 54% 6.2% 22%

7 New York 54% 11% 46%

8 Vermont 51% 32% 42%

9 Washington 50% 15% 43%

10 Massachusetts 49% 16%

YYCange

QQCange

% Abve5 Mbps

State

2

3

7

1

9

4

56

8

10


25/46


4.7 United States Narrowband Connectivity

, - n n- n in

n nnin aki w 256

k n 10 , wn in i 22, ini

n nin v i- nniviy n

. (akn n 47% in i n n

n i , n i in xy w i

n v w, i y n

in nyin Ip in .) t dii ci

nin v i v nwn in,

i nw n w 5%. t qy in

n 10 w ivy in n q,

q, wn -ii n

in w n in 10 . a w

ny, 42 w nwn in v in

q-v-q, I 2.1% ( 1.3%) n

iiv 37% in min ( 0.5%). Ininy, nin

w nwn in in in n q,

0.9% in in u ( 0.8%), n nx -

in n in Vn ( 0.7%). (hwv, wi

w in , n j v 1,000 niq Ip n

in i n, i n Ip n

n in n n.)

lkin w ny, yy n y

n nin v i nnin, wi

ny Viini in y-v-y in. (ti, in, y

n in nyin Ip in .) Y-

v-y in w iy n, nin 9.4% in

miiii ( 1.0%) 62% in hwii ( 0.3%).

In n q, 20 w nwn in

1% . dw in wi w

n nnin aki w 256 k, wi

j 0.1% . hwv, wi j w n

niq Ip nnin aki ,

i n Ip n n in

n n.

While we have made signifcant progress, the report shows

that approximately 28 percent o rural residents still lack

access to the kind o broadband that most Americans take

or granted. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski

[Source: http://cc.us/p1o0zO]

DID YOU

KNOW?

Figure 22: Narrowband Connectivity, Slowest U.S. States

1 District O Columbia 4.7% -12% -27%

2 Missouri 3.8% -17% -33%

3 Alaska 3.8% -3.0% -50%

4 Iowa 3.6% -5.9% -34%

5 Georgia 3.1% -8.4% -32%

6 Colorado 2.9% -8.2% -25%

7 Illinois 2.7% -9.3% -32%

8 Ohio 2.7% -9.9% -30%

9 Arkansas 2.5% 47% -12%

10 Washington 2.5% -3.4% -23%

YYCange

QQCange

% Bew256 kbps

State

1

3

5

2

4

76

10

8

9


26/46


sectIoN 5:gy ai pi rin

5.1 Asia Pacifc Average Connection Speeds

In ai pi in, s K nin v

i v nnin , w in y hn

Kn n Jn. a wn in i 23, ivy i qy

w w n in ni i, xin

in tiwn, wi w n 0.2% ( inin

in in q), n s K, wi in

j v 4%. Qy w 10% w n in

v ni/in.

ex in n in s K, y-v-y

n w n in i ni, wi

w 10% n in i ni/in.

Yy in n 3.2% in Ini n iiv

60% in myi. I i nin w in Ini

n- n, k 1 m ,

i n iv w .

t n q 2011 n in w ni/

in wi v nnin x

i n (5 m) , wi n iin v

n in v nnin x

n (2 m) . cin n Ini in

w i ni, wi cin ny xin

1.0 m, wi Ini k 0.8 m.

5.2 Asia Pacifc Average Connection Speeds,

City View


n in sin 3.2, nnin knwn i

n i nwk w v nyin


w.

In viwin 10 ii in ai pi in wi i v nnin , wn in i 24, w

ii in s K v in , wi

ii in Jn jiy n i. t v

nnin n in ii w n w q-

v-q, wi i in inin n v

ii k n i in in q.

t v nin qy in n in ny

ii in q.

iv, jiy ii w

in ai pi in, wi 100 i inin 59 in

Jn, 10 in s K, n in ai, n hn Kn. a-

iiny, i ny 900 ii qi inin

in i i in ii in sin, tiwn, Nw Zn,

tin, myi, cin, Ini, n piiin.

t i n ai pi rin n

sin 3 n j n i wiin in.

(t i in in nnin ini in nwkin ai pi in, n iin y aki es in .)

Figure 23: Average Measured Connection Speed by Asia Pacifc Country/Region

YYCange

QQCange

Q2 11Avg. Mbps

Cuntry/Regin

1 South Korea 13.8 -4.2% -17%

2 Hong Kong 10.3 12% 21%

3 Japan 8.9 10% 11%

29 Singapore 4.5 8.5% 47%35 Taiwan 4.2 0.2% 1.9%

40 New Zealand 3.8 9.6% 18%

43 Australia 3.5 4.6% 24%

49 Thailand 3.2 11% 9.1%

73 Malaysia 1.9 23% 60%

103 Philippines 1.2 4.5% 31%

105 China 1.1 13% 33%

112 India 0.8 7.1% 3.2%

GbaRank

4043

105

112

3

1

2

35

49

2973

103


27/46


5.4 Asia Pacifc Average Peak Connection Speeds,

City View

sii i ai pi ii y v nnin

, i 10 ii y v k nnin

w in Jn in n q. i 26

w tjn, s K , 55.3 m,

n w jin y v ii in vin v k nn-

in 50 m . (In q, ny si-

, Jn x 50 m.) Wi nin w wiin

ii in w, w y 10 ii

y v k nnin x 50 m.

iv, jiy ii w

in ai pi in, wi 100 i inin 58 ii

in Jn, 10 in s K, n in ai, n hn Kn.aiiny, i ny 900 ii qi inin

in i i in ii in sin, tiwn, Nw Zn,

tin, myi, cin, Ini, n piiin.

Figure 24: Average Measured Connection Speed,

Top Asia Pacifc Cities by Speed

1 Taegu, South Korea 15.8

2 Taejon, South Korea 15.83 Shimotsuma, Japan 15.2

4 Kanagawa, Japan 15.0

5 Tokai, Japan 14.2

6 Asahi, Japan 14.0

7 Urawa, Japan 13.9

8 Yokohama, Japan 13.7

9 Sangamdong, South Korea 13.7

10 Tochigi, Japan 13.4

Q2 11 Avg. MbpsCity

Figure 25: Average Peak Connection Speed by Asia Pacifc Country/Region

YYCange

QQCange

Q2 11Peak MbpsCuntry/Regin

1 Hong Kong 44.4 12% 40%

2 South Korea 35.7 -1.5% -6.0%4 Japan 31.6 5.5% 13%

19 Singapore 20.7 6.9% 62%

21 Taiwan 20.3 11% 45%

36 Thailand 16.8 20% 22%

45 Australia 15.2 3.6% 38%

47 New Zealand 15.0 9.4% 18%

60 Malaysia 11.6 30% 72%

82 Philippines 8.3 2.1% 31%

GbaRank

109 India 5.5 6.4% 19%

118 China 4.6 13% 36%

4745

118

109

4

2

1

21

36

1960

82

Figure 26: Average Peak Connection Speed, Top Asia Pacifc

Cities by Speed

1 Taejon, South Korea 55.3

2 Kanagawa, Japan 52.3

3 Marunouchi, Japan 51.6

4 Tokai, Japan 51.3

5 Shimotsuma, Japan 50.8

6 Nagano, Japan 50.0

7 Taegu, South Korea 49.9

8 Yokohama, Japan 49.8

9 Urawa, Japan 49.3

10 Asahi, Japan 46.9

Q2 11 Peak MbpsCity

5.3 Asia Pacifc Average Peak Connection Speedscnin wi i w q, hn Kn nin

v i v k nnin

ai pi in, 44.4 m. a wn in i 25,

qy w w n in 11 12 i ni/in,

nin j 2.1% in piiin 30% in myi,

in ny iiv v nnin

w. s K in qy w v

k nnin in ny i k w 36 m.

ain, x s K, yy n w xy

iiv in i ni/in. t yy inw n in myi, 72%, w y sin 62%.

t y-v-y w w in in Jn,

i w i vy 13% in.

cin n Ini i in i i, iky

iniin n ivn in qiy i- Inn

nniviy wiin ni.


28/46


5.5 Asia Pacifc High Broadband Connectivity

In n q 2011, 10 12 ai pi

ni/in vy w i v i -

n in n in q, wn in i 27.

t in q s K iv 60%

in , in in i q i k

58%, n w hn Kn v

i, wi 59% in . r n qy w

w n in ny ni/in, wi ix in in

10% , wi iiv 77% w in tin

i n. cin 25% q-v-q in

i vy i, i in w 1% i n in,

Ini, w 3.2% qy in i nin,

n inin n iv ni n in

in .

on y-v-y i, nin 12 i ni/in

w i v i n in n in

i y i. ain w n niin 391% y-

v-y in myi, wi cin n i -

in w. gw n ni w

n w, wi sin ny in, n tiwn

w 12%. di in qy w, Ini v

i n in nin w y-v-

y in. ti nin nn, i -

n in in ny in n n.

(N n in i q, piiin i in

in i k n, i n nk,

i i n v qii 25,000 niq Ip

i i.)

sectIoN 5:gy ai pi rin(nin)

5.6 Asia Pacifc Broadband Connectivity

a wn in i 28, qy n in n in

in ai pi in w ix in n q, wi

i ni in q-v-q w,

wi in q-v-q. bn

in i iy n ai pi in, wi i

12 i ni/in in i

nnin aki 2 m . hn Kn

nin i, wi n in 94%

in n q. cin i 12% w ny

i v 10% in, wi Ini iiv 45% qy

in i iny nin.

Wi y-v-y in w n in s K n Jn,

inin ni/in w ivy n w. oi , hn Kn w ny n n in

n 10%. In n, n in in myi w

iv 276% n q 2010. sii

nin - w, n- w n

in in Ini w vy n w in n q

i Ini n k i w , i qiky

n in 10%.

YYCange

QQCange

% Abve5 Mbps

Cuntry/Regin

2 Hong Kong 59% 6.7% 27%

3 South Korea 58% -3.5% -22%

6 Japan 55% -0.1% -8.9%

20 Singapore 33% 18% 94%

29 Taiwan 25% 3.5% 12%

37 Australia 19% 16% 54%

38 New Zealand 19% 29% 56%

45 Thailand 7.0% 77% 78%

50 Malaysia 3.7% 53% 391%

58 China 0.6% 25% 127%

GbaRank

59 India 0.4% 3.2% -14%

Philippines 0.5% 9.5% 22%

Figure 27: High Broadband Connectivity, Fastest Asia Pacifc Countries/Regions

3837

5859

6

3

2

29

45

2050


29/46


YYCange

QQCange

Cuntry/Regin

7 Hong Kong 94% 1.8% 1.8%

34 South Korea 80% -7.9% -14%

37 New Zealand 79% 6.4% 11%

39 Japan 76% -2.8% -12%

41 Taiwan 74% -1.2% 12%

48 Singapore 67% -2.4% 23%

49 Thailand 65% 6.1% 8.5%

56 Australia 55% -2.8% 11%

76 Malaysia 22% 51% 276%

83 China 12% 28% 79%

GbaRank

85 Philippines 9.3% -7.8% 58%

87 India 7.1% 45% 63%

Figure 28: Broadband Connectivity, Fast Asia Pacifc Countries/Regions

% Abve2 Mbps

3756

83

87

39

34

7

41

8549

4876

5.7 Asia Pacifc Narrowband Connectivity

In viwin i 29, w , wi xin

Ini, nwn in n ai pi ni/in

in w 10%. Wi 12% qy in w

in in in i iin in n-,

ny n k in in iin, i i n

n in y-v-y w i i. an

inin ni/in, s K n tiwn w

nn-ivi q-v-q in, wi ny

n i nnin aki w 256 k,

i w in inin nn. sii ni

n in sin 5.5 v, sin n hn Kn in

wiin i i k n, n nk

aki w w n 25,000 niq Ip

i i i.

a n v, Ini w i y-v-y in

in nwn in, wi s K w iiny

137% in. hwv, wi s K w -

in , n wi iiv n n in Ini,

in n inin nn. owi, yy

n i i w vy n ai

pi in, nin 29% in in Jn 68%

in in piiin (n 90% in sin i w in

nn-nk ni).

YYCange

QQCange

Cuntry/Regin

6 India 31% -12% 3.2%

15 China 5.9% -25% -55%

20 New Zealand 4.1% -8.7% -35%

23 Philippines 2.5% -26% -68%

25 Malaysia 2.2% -19% -67%

26 Australia 2.1% -4.4% -57%

28 Thailand 1.8% -9.1% -62%

31 Japan 1.0% -9% -29%

36 South Korea 0.5% 8.6% 137%

39 Taiwan 0.5% 63% -60%

GbaRank

Singapore 0.5% 6.6% -90%

Hong Kong 0.2% -21% -50%

Figure 29: Narrowband Connectivity, Slowest Asia Pacifc Countries/Regions

% Bew256 kbps

2026

15

6

31

36

39

2328

25


30/46


sectIoN 6:gy e

6.1 Europe Average Connection Speeds

Wiin e, Nn i v

nnin in n q, in 8.5 m.

a wn in i 30, qy w w vwiny

iiv, wi ny uni a ei in qy

in, n 14 ni win 10% q-v-

q. an i ni, qy in n

2.3% in rni ai n pn in w

20% .

Y-v-y n w y iiv wi ny

rni n swn in in yy in. Yy

w in inin ni w xy n, wi

w v w n in n, i

17%. tky w i v nnin y n n q 2010, wi

i n in uni a ei.

In n q 2011, ixn i ni

v nnin x i

n (5 m) , wi inin ix

v nnin x n

(2 m) .

Wi i i State o the Internet, w wi in xin nnin

n in i ni wiin e. t i

n e n sin 3 n j n i wiin in. (t i

in in nnin ini in nwk in e, n

iin y aki es in .) In iin, i

, w inin uni a ei ni

wiin e.

Figure 30: Average Measured Connection Speed by European Country

YYCangeQQCangeCuntry/ReginGbaRank


6 Czech Republic 7.4 13% 39%


8 Romania 6.8 2.3% -0.1%

9 Belgium 6.4 4.8% 22%

10 Denmark 6.4 13% 23%

12 Norway 6.3 18% 35%

13 Ireland 6.1 8.4% 19%

15 Hungary 5.8 13% 31%

17 Finland 5.7 16% 39%

19 Slovakia 5.5 15% 33%

20 Portugal 5.4 9.3% 37%21 Germany 5.3 11% 28%

22 Sweden 5.3 6.2% -4.2%

23 Austria 5.3 20% 40%

25 United Kingdom 5.0 9.0% 28%

33 Poland 4.3 21% 47%

34 Italy 4.2 15% 40%

38 Spain 3.9 15% 42%

39 France 3.9 8.8% 17%

48 United Arab Emirates 3.2 -18% 117%

56 Turkey 2.7 10% 54%

Q2 11Avg. Mbps

6 22

21

17

56

9

4

13

39

1012

34

38

25

33

8

15

19

7 2320 48


31/46


w w . h ni w yy

w in x 50%, inin iv 265% in -

n q 2010 in uni a ei.

mny ni in e y niz in

i- Inn nniviy, wi vin y

in qivn nin n n, n

ninin y v. t iiv -

n n- n v k nnin

en ni in nin ivn in

i- Inn nniviy wiin ni.

6.2 Europe Average Connection Speeds, City View


n in sin 3.2, nnin knwn i n

i nwk w v nyin


i viw w.

In viwin 10 ii in e wi i v-

nnin , wn in i 31, w bn,

cz ri i 8.3 m. bn i w y

y gnv, n w ii in swizn k 10

i. rni i ny ny in e v

n in iy n 10 i. t v nnin

n 10 ii , viy, w v

5 m i n .

t i ny 900 ii qi inin in i

i in ii in dnk, Nwy, In, hny,

inn, svki, gny, swn, ai, uni Kin,

pn, Iy, sin, n, uni a ei, n tky.

Figure 31: Average Measured Connection Speed, Top European

Cities by Speed

1 Brno, Czech Republic 8.3

2 Geneva, Switzerland 8.2

3 Riga, Latvia 8.1

4 Amsterdam, Netherlands 8.15 Constanta, Romania 7.9

6 Zurich, Switzerland 7.9

7 Liege, Belgium 7.4

8 Salzburg, Austria 7.2

9 Porto, Portugal 7.1

10 Timosoara, Romania 6.9

Q2 11 Avg. MbpsCity

6.3 Europe Average Peak Connection Speeds

a wn in i 32, v k nnin

i en ni x 15 m in

n q, wi i (33.7 m) n in rni.

Qy n in w iiv in -

n q w. Qy w n n in

2.9% in rni n in 19% in ai. tin

i ni w v k nnin

in y n 10% in n q.

Y-v-y n n i en ni

w vwiny iiv, wi swn 7.8%

YYCange

QQCange

Q2 11Peak Mbps

Cuntry/ReginGbaRank

Figure 32: Average Peak Connection Speed by European Country

3 Romania 33.7 2.9% 25%

6 United Arab Emirates 26.8 3.5% 265%

7 Belgium 26.8 8.5% 41%

8 Portugal 26.2 5.2% 55%


10 Hungary 24.4 14% 72%


14 Czech Republic 22.6 9.6% 56%

17 Norway 21.2 15% 56%

20 Slovakia 20.5 11% 44%

22 Denmark 20.3 17% 45%

23 Germany 20.1 9.9% 46%24 Sweden 19.9 4.4% 7.8%

25 Ireland 19.8 6.5% 44%

27 Finland 19.3 17% 68%

28 United Kingdom 18.9 10% 41%

29 Austria 18.6 19% 63%

30 Spain 18.6 18% 74%

37 Italy 16.6 11% 44%

39 Poland 16.4 18% 81%

42 France 15.6 9.5% 32%

46 Turkey 15.1 11% 69%

7

24

23

27

3

46

39

25

42

17

37

308

14

22

28

6

10

20

9

12 29


32/46


6.4 Europe Average Peak Connection Speeds,

City View

a wi e av cnnin s, ciy Viw

i viw v, rni n swizn ny

w ni v i ii wiin 10 i

en ii wi i v k nn-

in . a wn in i 33, cnn n ti,

rni k w , in v k

nnin ininy i n ii in

10; n wi bn, cz ri, y w

ny ii iv v k nnin v

30 m in n q.

t i ny 900 ii qi inin in

i i in ii in dnk, Nwy, In,hny, inn, svki, gny, swn, ai, pn,

Iy, sin, n, uni a ei, n tky.

w in x 50% q-v-q, Iy w

n 40%, pn w n 30%, n vn n-

i w 20% .

Yy n in e w iiv w, wi ix ni

win i n in n 100%

n q 2010. t uni a ei-

w 379% w in n in y-v-y,

n sin w ny 200% in. tn iin ni

w yy n 50% n ny n (rni)

w yy n w 10%.

sectIoN 6:gy e(nin)

Figure 33: Average Peak Connection Speed, Top European

Cities by Speed

1 Constanta, Romania 45.2

2 Timisoara, Romania 38.8

3 Brno, Czech Republic 31.4

4 Riga, Latvia 29.2

5 Porto, Portugal 29.0

6 Zurich, Switzerland 28.7

7 Liege, Belgium 26.98 Geneva, Switzerland 26.3

9 Amsterdam, Netherlands 24.6

10 Bradord, England 23.5

Q2 11 Peak MbpsCity

6.5 Europe High Broadband Connectivity

In n q 2011, ix ni in e

n i nnin aki 5

m v. a wn in i 34, n i n

in i iy vn e, wi ny

ni in in w 20%, n ny n

(tky) in n 10% i n in,

iiny w 2.9%

Qy n e w iiv in n

q, wi ny uni a ei in n.

Qy in n 1.2% in rni

n iiv 65% in sin. Wi sin w ny ny

YYCange

QQCange

% Abve5 Mbps

Cuntry/ReginGbaRank

1 Netherlands 68% 22% 40%

4 Belgium 57% 9.9% 43%

7 Czech Republic 55% 13% 63%

8 Romania 52% 1.2% 7.7%

9 Denmark 52% 21% 39%

10 Switzerland 50% 25% 107%

12 Portugal 44% 18% 88%

14 Norway 41% 17% 70%

15 Hungary 41% 17% 51%

16 Finland 36% 18% 58%

19 Germany 34% 27% 70%

21 Ireland 32% 11% 111%23 Austria 30% 28% 66%

24 Sweden 30% 4.5% -11%

25 United Kingdom 30% 18% 70%

32 Poland 23% 37% 93%

33 Slovakia 23% 13% 72%

36 United Arab Emirates 21% -26% 379%

39 Spain 17% 65% 198%

42 Italy 16% 41% 166%

43 France 15% 20% 34%

52 Turkey 2.9% 29% 134%

Figure 34: High Broadband Connectivity, Fastest European Countries

24

19

16

8

52

15

4

21

43

14

42

39

25

36

33

32

79 2312

1

10


33/46


34/46


sectIoN 6:gy e(nin)

6.7 Europe Narrowband Connectivity

In viwin i 36, i i w i i

ni in e i n qiy inin in i i

aki i n qii 25,000 niq

Ip kin q nn w 256

k. ti i n niy nx, ivn xy n

n in ii v.

o vn ni qi inin, n w

nk y, w nwn in w n

n. b q-v-q n y-v-y n

n i ni w ix in n q.

Iy, - n n- n w

niv ( i, n nin in in n n-

wn nnin), wi w in wi, v w v wi v i nin i.

an ni in qiy inin, nw-

n in w xy w, wi svki

1.8% i, n ni in nwn

j n n. Niv q-v-q n

y-v-y n w vn n i

ni, svki i ny in.

YY

Cange

QQ

Cange

% Abve

256 kbpsCuntry/Regin

Gba

Rank

Figure 36: Narrowband Connectivity, Slowest European Countries

32 Italy 0.8% -7.9% -44%

33 Spain 0.7% 6.7% -36%

34 United Kingdom 0.6% -11% -47%

35 Sweden 0.5% -26% -65%

37 Turkey 0.5% 7.5% 51%

38 Germany 0.5% -11% -36%

40 France 0.3% -6.7% -67%

Netherlands 0.4% -21% -39%

Ireland 1.6% -13% -51%

Poland 0.3% -31% -63%

Norway 0.7% -13% -8.9%

United Arab Emirates 1.5% -21% -79%

Slovakia 1.8% 35% 255%

Switzerland 0.4% -8.9% -33%

Finland 0.4% -8.3% -73%

Belgium 0.3% -30% -13%

Austria 0.3% -21% -72%

Denmark 0.2% -3.6% -68%

Portugal 0.2% 0.5% -42%

Romania 0.1% -3.9% -63%

Hungary 0.1% -28% -58%

Czech Republic 0.1% -23% -76%

35

38

37

40

32

33

34


35/46


sectIoN 7:mi cnniviy

biin n n in vi iin State o the Internet

, aki nin iniy iin i nwk inin in

, w in nwk qny ini vin xy/wy nin kw . t in i in

n n ny n, , , n

vi nn Inn i nwk. In iin, i

iin State o the Internet n in in ini in i

w n n ni y ein, in vi

niin qin n vi i n x nwk

y. aki n ein v n v v n-

-n in n, iiy, n viiiy i nn

n iin n .16

a n n in i q,

i in i j win nin:

a ini 1,000 niq Ip nnin

aki nwk in n q 2011

w qi inin in i.

In ni w aki i nwk

vi, ny i, n niq

Ip n.

t n i i nwk vi v n

nny, n vi ini y niq Id.

d i in ny nwk w aki iv

ni an sy (as) i i i,

i nwk vi ix x/wiin (dsl,

, .) nnin wi i nnin

n in nwk ini, as w n in in

.

aki es w i

inn.

7.1 Attack Trafc rom Mobile Networks,

Top Originating Countries

In viwin n in i 37, w n w

inin vn in iiin k

in i nwk in n q 2011. m ny,

uni s v i, nin 42%

v . t n v k Iy

w i n n in q, in i

wn in n , n ri -n i in i ,

ni 13% v k i nwk.

hwv, in xinin nyin in i, i

w inin n n w n

y nn i nwk in uni s n

ri in n q, wi iky n i n

n n wiin 10 i. ri -ny in

10 i anin i i , inin

ni w in q. ak w y

nn n in i q, wi ni

ni 70% v k, n 10

ni ny 90% v k.


36/46


sectIoN 7:mi cnniviy (nin)

7.2 Attack Trafc rom Mobile Networks, Top Ports

In n q 2011, nin 10

y k in i nwk w

in q 2011. In n q, p 5900

(VNc sv) n i, in p 443 (https/

ssl) i i v w n in q.

a wn in i 38, k in iy nin

wi n in q, wi p 445 ni

79% v k (wn 80% in q-

), n 10 w n in ni j

v 97% v k. diin in i y

k y 10 ni, w n

cin w ny ny w p 445 w n -

(i w p 1433), n v jiy k

Iy w n p 445 n p 23.

a w v n in i , w iv v

k iinin knwn i nwk i iky

in n y in pc-y in nnin wi

nwk i n ni, n n

y in n ii i nn vi.

Figure 37: Attack Trafc rom Mobile Networks, Top Originating Countries

1 United States 42%

2 Italy 14%3 Russia 13%

4 Chile 4.3%

5 Malaysia 3.6%

6 Australia 3.5%

7 Poland 2.5%

8 China 2.3%

9 Hungary 1.8%

10 Lithuania 1.4%

Other 11%

Q2 11 % TrafcCuntry/Regin

1

3

8

4

65

10

2

9

7

SSH 1.2%

Microsot SQL Server 1.8%

Figure 38: Attack Trafc rom Mobile Networks, Top Ports

445 Microsot-DS 79%

23 Telnet 8.1%

135 Microsot-RPC 2.3%

1433 Microsot SQL Server 1.8%

80 WWW 1.5%

22 SSH 1.2%

5900 VNC Server 1.0%

139 NetBIOS 0.9%

4899 Remote Administrator 0.9%

3389 Microsot Terminal Services 0.5%

Various Other 2.6%

Q2 11 % TrafcPrt UsePrtOther 2.6% WWW 1.5%

Microsot RPC 2.3%

VNC Server 1.0%

NetBIOS 0.9%

Remote Administrator 0.9%

Microsot TerminalServices 0.5%

Telnet8.1%

Microsot-DS 79%


37/46


7.3 Connection Speeds & Data Consumption

on Mobile Networks

In n q 2011, i vi gr-1 in

g in i iin vi wi i

v nnin , 5.3 m. (mi vi pl-4

in pn, wi w vi in q,

y iv n v nnin 6.9 m in

n q, i i n qiy inin n

iin ii v, in i vi-

pn i niq Ip n in

n q.) In viwin v nnin

103 i vi i in i 39, w n gr-1

w ny vi wi n v nnin in

i n (>5 m) n, wi 25 iin vi

v nnin in n (>2 m)

n. an 49 vi v nnin

1 m . t i vi wi w v-

nnin in sK-1 in svki, wi n v-

nnin 209 k w, i i 28%

q-v-q, n 81% y-v-y.

In viwin qy n, i ny n vi

(ar-2 in anin) w i v nnin w

n 100% q-v-q i w 154% 1.9

m. J w vi (No-1 in Nwy n sV-3 in e sv-

) in i v nnin y 50% q. Qy w n

1% w n w vi, wi n w in

nn. In n, kin yy n, w n

v nnin in y n 100% y-

v-y 22 vi, wi 338% w xin y

gr-1 in g . i vi w i

v nnin in nin wi

i y .

exinin v k nnin

n q 2011, w n i vi in

ai (at-2) i v k nnin ,

23.4 m. o i i vi, v

k nnin in x 20 m, wi n iin

27 v k nnin v 10 m. av

k nnin n 5 m w v in

47 vi, n n inin vi v k nnin v 2 m. pvi Za-1 in

s ai n in w v k nnin

in n q, 1.2 m.

In kin qy n, w n vi (es-2

in sin, ar-2 in anin, n mY-1 in myi) w i v-

k nnin w y n 100% q-

v-q. hwv, wi es-2 w ny 200%, niq

Ip n vi w n j 2% n n

y w vi, in ni

iv.) Qy in in v k nn-in w n 78 iin vi, wi w

vi w n n q. on y-v-y

i, w in v k nnin 100%

w n 29 vi, wi 391% w gn

vi de-1 . an iin 60 vi w yy

in, wi vi w v k nnin

nn wi n q 2010.

n q 2011, w n n 10 i

vi n, n v, n iy (1 gb)

nn aki n. (on in, i n in

vi ca-1, wi n n in xy -

i.) u n n iin 74 i vi n

w wn n 100 mb nn aki

n in n q, wi 20 vi

(xin be-3, i in q ) wn

w n 100 mb. cnin w n 100% q-

v-q n w vi (mY-1 n mY-2 in myi), n

qy w w n 61 vi in . t y-

v-y in w n in gny, vi de-3, wi

in v 887% n q 2010. twny-

vi y n i v ny

nn nin aki y-v-y.


38/46


sectIoN 7:mi cnniviy (nin)

Austria AT-2 3712 23405 690Belgium BE-1 2934 10656 529

Belgium BE-2 1875 5033 21

Croatia HR-1 6890 42044 5837

Czech Republic CZ-1 1791 9222 90



Estonia EE-1 1373 6778 280

France FR-2 2286 8511 1639

Germany DE-1 841 2966 80

Germany DE-2 4285 14558 1984

Germany DE-3 1982 7792 158

Greece GR-2 1094 6367 140

Greece GR-1 5284 20007 656

Hungary HU-2 2563 14563 132

Hungary HU-1 1853 9486 125

Ireland IE-1 3030 13957 717

Ireland IE-2 2038 15430 769

Ireland IE-3 2168 16075 1000

Italy IT-3 3346 13447 544

Italy IT-2 3871 19430 490

Italy IT-4 1289 8504 224

Italy IT-1 1882 12408 328

Lithuania LT-2 1871 11063 385

Lithuania LT-1 2511 14143 527

Moldova MD-1 1945 7975 161

Netherlands NL-2 2460 6740 31

Netherlands NL-1 1663 4915 40

Q2 11Avg.kbps

IDQ2 11Peakkbps

Q2 11Avg. MB/mnt

Cuntry/Regin

AFRICAEgypt EG-1 521 3231 202

Morocco MA-1 1258 11996 313

Nigeria NG-1 233 5179 528

South Arica ZA-1 427 1191 178

Asia

China CN-1 1437 3731 225

Hong Kong HK-2 1971 10609 464

Hong Kong HK-1 2454 14244 3597

India IN-1 1189 2448 8

Indonesia ID-1 518 7139 3981

Israel IL-1 1406 6122 57

Kuwait KW-1 1510 5724 135

Malaysia MY-3 1003 6917 380

Malaysia MY-1 787 7730 435

Malaysia MY-2 1423 8729 2749

Pakistan PK-1 951 5869 486

Qatar QA-1 1327 3272 19

Saudi Arabia SA-1 1745 6644 113

Singapore SG-3 1312 6675 514

Singapore SG-5 567 3795 91

Singapore SG-4 1378 4501 102

Sri Lanka LK-1 726 6658 322

Taiwan TW-1 1232 6514 126

Taiwan TW-2 916 6086 147

Thailand TH-1 553 4729 99

Europe

Austria AT-1 3041 13387 152

Q2 11Avg.kbps

IDQ2 11Peakkbps

Q2 11Avg. MB/mnt

Cuntry/Regin

ASIA

EURoPE

AFRICA

Figure 39: Average and Average Peak Connection Speed, Average Megabytes Downloaded per Month by Mobile Provider

According to a May 2011 survey o American adults by the

Pew Internet Project, Some 87% o smartphone owners

access the internet or email on their handheld, includingtwo-thirds (68%) who do so on a typical day. When asked

what device they normally use to access the internet, 25%

o smartphone owners say that they mostly go online

using their phone, rather than with a computer.

[Source: http://bit.ly/pOxDXQ]

DID YOU

KNOW?


39/46


Norway NO-2 1893 6518 55Norway NO-1 2040 8749 62

Poland PL-1 4053 15372 173

Poland PL-2 1622 9002 84

Poland PL-3 1661 9529 134

Portugal PT-1 911 4548 201

Romania RO-1 750 3907 86

Russia RU-3 1181 4369 118

Russia RU-4 3270 12122 411

Slovakia SK-1 209 2174 36

Slovakia SK-2 2471 10653 1781

Slovenia SI-1 2127 8131 48

Spain ES-3 1078 5357 115

Spain ES-2 1264 9602 123

Turkey TR-1 1832 8715 184

Ukraine UA-1 1489 4601 93

Ukraine UA-2 1917 7127 118

United Kingdom UK-3 3985 19062 90



North America

Canada CA-2 1105 2757 553

Canada CA-1 4017 21011 25853

Curacao CW-1 646 3774 256

El Salvador SV-2 1968 8655 562



Guatemala GT-2 1147 6954 752

Q2 11Avg.kbps

IDQ2 11Peakkbps

Q2 11Avg. MB/mnt

Cuntry/Regin

NoRTh AMERICA

Guatemala GT-1 1140 6308 317Mexico MX-1 946 7114 223

Mexico MX-2 2246 15180 4953

Nicaragua NI-1 1506 8123 724

Puerto Rico PR-1 2604 10601 2990

United States US-2 1036 4198 41



Oceania

Australia AU-3 1601 8705 268

Australia AU-1 1258 11610 2307

Guam GU-1 597 3405 83

New Caledonia NC-1 585 2141 541

New Zealand NZ-2 1546 8445 633

South America

Argentina AR-1 702 5380 140

Argentina AR-2 1916 10388 157

Bolivia BO-1 306 5125 209

Brazil BR-1 806 4594 149

Brazil BR-2 940 4110 241

Chile CL-4 908 9711 483

Chile CL-3 1560 11207 133

Colombia CO-1 1003 6541 156

Paraguay PY-2 356 4452 399

Paraguay PY-1 643 5850 163

Uruguay UY-1 1984 17042 276

Uruguay UY-2 542 4712 63

Venezuela VE-1 911 6146 178

Q2 11Avg.kbps

IDQ2 11Peakkbps

Q2 11Avg. MB/mnt

Cuntry/Regin

SoUTh AMERICA

oCEANIA

It is very clear that mobile will be at the center o human

evolution or years to come. Mobile collapses time and distance

and as such impacts every acet o our lives. While we havecome to know the mobile phone as a communications device,

their role in our daily lives has been expanding.

[Source: http://slidesha.re/oO7Ew4]

DID YOU

KNOW?


40/46


sectIoN 7:mi cnniviy(nin)

7.5 Smartphone Usage As Observed by Ericsson

ti in invi i v in

n wky n . t nin n

n ein i n n in

n q 2011 in in k

in e, ai n N ai.

i 41 n 42 n

n n. hn

in i 41 n 42 iz y in y,

(y), n iz in ix (320x480 = ,

480x800 i = ) n n ($$$ = xniv

, k i k n n & iin

i v n). (N ipn n ani

n n iy iini in in

w in nny.)

i 41 i iv n

nin n 1 mb y n v. t

i iv n i i nw ani n

ipn : 50% - 75% i nin n

1 mb y n v. ty w y inx-

niv ani n ipn n Winw mi n

(30% - 55%) n ny y syin n bky n

(ny 5% - 35%). I i inin n ikin in

wn i n y iv bky in N ai i N ai. (bky vi

v v iiin in ny ni, inin

viiiy.)

7.4 Mobile Trafc Growth As Observed By Ericsson

In i nwk, i () i in

y in in . I i in nn v n n in n

xin. ein n in n

180 ni n i nin n

1,000 nwk n ein i vi n

v. t i niv in

w i in 2g, 3g, n 4g nwk (n

inin dVb-h, Wii, n mi Wimx).

t n v n v y,

inin n w wi n

viin. hwv, n n vi

in nwk (2g, 3g, 4g/lte) n w w

in in v wn k n in, n

wn i in .

a i in i 40, v i

n q 2010 n q

2011, n w 8% wn n n q

2011. ti ivy qy w y

n viin in v, ein n

y v v viin in . (N

i qy w i n vi/

q i . aiiny, n n , y-xi in i 40 w viy

exy i i py.)

Voice

Data

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Q1

07

Q2

07

Q3

07

Q4

07

Q1

08

Q2

08

Q3

08

Q4

08

Q1

09

Q2

09

Q3

09

Q4

09

Q1

10

Q1

11

Q2

11

Q2

10

Q3

10

Q4

10

Total(UL+DL)m

onthlytraffic

(Petabyte

/month)

Figure 40: Total Monthly Mobile Voice and Data as Measured by Ericsson [Source: Ericsson]


41/46


op1 Europe op2 Asia op3 Asia op4 North America

50% 75%new and expensiveAndroid / iPhone

35% 55%old Android/iPhoneor cheap Androidor Windows Mobile

5% 35%Symbian orBlackberry

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

Blackberry09m

id$$$

Sym

bian09sm

all$$$

Symbian08m

id$$$

Symbian

09mid

Symbian

09mid

iPhone

/Android0

8sma

ll

iPhone/Android0

8small

iPhone/Andro

id0

8small

iPhone/Android0

9small

iPhone/Android0

9small

iPhone/Android0

9small

iPhone/Android0

9small

iPhone/Android0

9small

iPhone/Android1

0small

iPhone/Android1

0small

iPhone/Andro

id1

0small

iPhone/Android1

0large

iPhone/Android1

0large

iPhone/Android1

0large

iPhone/Android1

0large

iPhone/Andro

id1

0large

iPhone/Android1

0large

iPhone/Android1

0large

Blackberry

09m

id$$$

Blackberry09sm

all$$$

Blackberry09m

id$$$

Blackberry

09m

id$$$

Blackberry10m

id$$$

WindowsMobile09lar

ge$$$

Figure 41: Ratio o active smartphone users (> 1 MB / day on average) [Source: Ericsson]

MB/week

80

120

100

60

40

20

0

140

Symbian09sma

ll$$$

Symbian08mid$$$

Symbian0

9mid

iPhone/Android08

small

iPhone/Android09

small

iPhone/Android10

small

Blackberry09mid$$$

Blackberry09mid$$$

iPhone/Android08

small

iPhone/Android09

small

iPhone/Android10

large

iPhone/Android10

large

iPhone/Android09

small

iPhone/Android10

large

iPhone/Android10

large

Symbian0

9mid

Blackberry09sma

ll$$$

Blackberry09mid$$$

Blackberry09mid$$$

Blackberry10mid$$$

Windows

Mobile09larg

e$$$

iPhone/Android08

small

iPhone/Android09

small

iPhone/Android09

small

iPhone/Android10

large

iPhone/Android10

small

iPhone/Android10

large

iPhone/Android10

large

iPhone/Android10

small

op1 Europe op2 Asia op3 Asia op4 North America

Median

Figure 42: Median o weekly smartphone trafc volumes or active users (>1 MB/day) [Source: Ericsson]


42/46


sectIoN 7:mi cnniviy(nin)

iv n w y i vi

n, in in in wky v

i inin os, i, n iz, . i 42

w in wky v (50 ni) ivn nin n 1 mb y.

ti v vi wn 30 mb 80 mb n

n .

Wi n iv i

ininy y os, , n, . (

n in i 41), kin ny iv wi n 1

mb y n v, v vy ii

in n ( n in i 42).

on n in i in N ai, nw n

xniv n wi n n w

i n n nyz

in ai n e. an n in i bk-

y vi (iy i N ai) n inin

i nn wi in.

i 43 i wn in n in -

n (nw i-n ani wi n)

n i n w v wky iin

in i . si v

n n i v, ..,

95-100% n vi 5% i.

aiin in in i i

ininy iin, .., i nwkin n

wn in ny iny in vi -

i . In n, nin vi n x n

n x 5-10% n .

hvy wiin n w ni

i wi win nin vi n i n n

in (~40 in / y n v vi5% ~ 0.5 in / y in

n ).

sii iin ii n v

nw i-n ani n ipn w.

GB/week/subscriber

Online Video Online AudioSocial

NetworkingWeb Browsing App Store Email

95 100%

90 95%

85 90%

80 85%

75 80%

70 75%

65 70%

60 65%

55 60%

50 55%

4

3

2

1

0

Figure 43: Average weekly application trafc or dierent subscriber clusters o a new Android smartphone model


43/46


6/2/20

110:00

6/3/20

110:00

6/2/20

116:00

6/2/20

1112

:00

6/2/20

1118

:00

6/3/20

116:00

6/3/20

1112

:00

6/3/20

1118

:00

6/4/20

110:00

6/5/20

110:00

6/4/20

116:00

6/4/20

1112

:00

6/4/20

1118

:00

Figure 44: An Internet shutdown in Syria occurred in early June

sin n Jn 3, Inn in syi xin n Inn iin

wn n n n y. a wn in i 45, aki

in iv in syi iiy y in nin (en ti) Jn 3, in n-z v y i-y. an 6 (en ti) n

Jn 4, aki v syi n v ii n i

wn.

sectIoN 8:Nwk o & diin

ain 17 Inn niin

rny, Inn nniviy in syi n iiy n n

i vi, -wn syin t ein.

rny n nwk n

in nin syit 3g i nwk,

w wn Isp inin sw, INet, nrnn; nwk nin syin vnn -

in , wv.

I n i w n Inn

in syi, , i w ii Inn

iin n in liy in q, in i-

, w (n n ii n).


44/46


sectIoN 9:anix

*Countrieslistedwithhadfewerthan25,0

00uniqueIPaddressesconnectingtoAkamaiduring

thesecondquarteratthisspeed.Basedontherevisedthresholdforinclusion,theywerenotincludedintheglobalranking. Unique IP

AddressesAvg. CnnectinSpeed (Mbps)

Peak CnnectinSpeed (Mbps)

% AttackTrafc

% Abve5 Mbps*

% Abve2 Mbps*

% Bew256 kbps*

Cuntry/Regin

EURoPE

Austria 0.1% 3,000,038 5.3 18.6 30% 77%

Belgium


45/46


1 ://www.wik./w-i-n--i.

2 ://n.wikii./wiki/avn_enyin_sn

3 ://.ni.v/iin//140-2/1402.

4 :// .ni.v/iin//186-3/_186-3.

5 ://www..v//ivy/i/nnin/vnii/i.

6 ://.ni.n/ni//ni/-ni-xn-

7 ://i./w/nw/?=3861

8 ://www.nn./in/nn52/nin/mny/-20110613-Isoc-WIpv6dy-NaNog52.

9 ://n.wikii./wiki/Ipv6_i_yn

10 ://n.wikii./wiki/64

11 ://n.wikii./wiki/t_nnin

12 ://www.ki.//wi/hw_wi__inn_.

13 ://www.-y./q/

14 t v k nnin i n n v xi nnin niq

Ip n y aki i y. t v i in ii i nniv xi-

nnin . In n v nnin , v k nnin i i

niv w ny n- Inn nnin . (ti in iin - in

ni y in wiin nwk y vi, in iv wn .)

15 ://www.y.///i/2011/05/03/kzkn-i--iv-100-n-v-

y-2013/

16 ://www.ki./in/inx1.

17 ://www.ny.//2011/06/yin-inn-wn.

sectIoN 10:enn


46/46

t aki dinaki k Inn wk -knwn ni in w wi i in in,

, wi, hd vi n w---vi. divin n n, n iy, aki

in i n aki Inin Inn p, niq in iny i i niniy n inin

n i i y ii 650 ii, in 74 ni n in in 1,000 Inn

in nwk. t n vii www.ki. w n twi @ki.

aknwnEDITOR: dvi bn

EXECUTIVE EDITOR: b rinkin

EXECUTIVE EDITOR:t lin

2011 aki tni, In. a ri rv. rin in

International Ofces

unin,

gny

bn, Ini

syny ai

Akamai Technologies, Inc.

U.S. Headquarters

8 ci cn

ci ma 02142

CONTRIBUTOR: Jn tn

C

Documents

Akamai - State of Art Intenet 2011 Volume 4 Part 2