Aisc - Office Buildings

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    1/16

    MEETING THE

    CHALLENGES OF

    THE 21ST CENTURY

    S T E E L - F R A M E D F F I C E B U I L D I N G S

    O

    There's always a solution in steel!

    stru

    ctur

    alsteel

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    2/16

    stru

    cturalsteel

    A B N A M R O B A N KChicago, IL

    OWNER: ABN AMRO Bank of North America

    PROGRAM MANAGER: Hines

    ARCHITECT: DeStefano and Partners, LTD.

    STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Thornton Thomasetti Engineers

    GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Turner Construction Co.

    STEEL FABRICATOR: Zalk Josephs Fabricators, LLC.

    STEEL ERECTOR: Area Erectors, Inc.

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    3/16

    Cost, Speed, Quality, and Marketability are important considerations thatdrive the decision owners and developers make for new office building construction. Who

    isnt worried about budgets or schedules and if their new facility will meet their quality

    expectations within budget? And who doesnt worry about how marketable the building will

    be in order to attract and retain tenants that will ensure profits through the expected life of the

    building?

    The selection of the structural steel framing system is the first step in meeting those

    considerations. And it has been the first step for countless office structures in the United States

    dating back to 1885 when steel was used for the first time in the 10-story Home Insurance

    Building located in Chicago, IL. Steel is the material of choice of project decision makers that

    have learned steel-framed office buildings are unsurpassed in:

    Cost-effective construction

    Accelerated project schedules

    Early occupancy

    Reduced life-cycle costs

    Future adaptability to changing tenant requirements

    Meeting security, fire protection, blast and progressive collapse demands

    Ease of integration with other building systems

    Increased schedule control due to all-weather erection capabilities

    Quality assurance due to offsite fabrication in controlled environments

    Column-free space maximizing space usage and office layout flexibility

    Enhanced flexibility and comfort to attract and retain potential tenants

    Maximized resale value and minimized demolition costs

    I N T R O D U C T I O N

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    4/16

    2

    In addition, new emerging technologies and systems are increasing the positive impact that steel has on

    projects today. Some of those innovations have been driven by the new imperatives of building design

    and construction in the 21st century: the ability to withstand terrorist acts, higher standards for seismic

    safety and fire safety at reasonable cost, increased need to layout flexibility, energy efficiency, and

    sustainable design.

    What follows is a journey across the country looking at nine examples of steel-framed offices, each one

    illustrating one or more ways of meeting owners and developers demands for better facilities that are

    faster to build and at the lowest total cost.

    Congress Center: A Chicago, IL, mid-rise office where the developer saved over $500,000 byminimizing floor depth to reduce the cost of cladding and mechanical services and ended up with

    over 33,000 sq ft of column-free space per floor, gaining a competitive advantage in the office market.

    General Services Administration: A low-rise build-to-suit office in Atlanta, GA, whose fast-track design

    and construction resists progressive collapse in the event of a terrorist attack and is easily adaptableto future changes.

    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation: A built-to-suit mid-rise office in Albany,

    NY, where the owner, foreseeing winter construction, chose steel, which aided in satisfying the rigid

    environmental standards of LEED certification by the U.S. Green Building Council.

    ADC Telecommunications: A low-rise build-to-suit office campus in Eden Prairie, MN, where spray-on

    fire protection was in large part eliminated on the exposed structural steel to accomplish the owners

    aesthetic requirements without compromising the highest standards of life safety and property

    protection.

    Bureau of Indian Affairs: A low-rise office in Albuquerque, NM, where weeks were cut out of the

    design and construction schedule through the use of new software that allows movement of

    information from design to detailing to automated fabrication electronically while still satisfying the

    owners design requirements against progressive collapse from terrorist acts.

    JPMorgan Chase: A San Francisco investment high-rise signature office where the developer saved

    $1,250,000 in the overall cost of cladding and mechanical services by minimizing floor and ceiling

    thickness. The office, which required large column-free areas, also had to meet stringent new seismic

    requirements cost-effectively.

    CNF Transportation, Inc.: A mid-rise build-to-suit office in Portland, OR, with column-free working

    areas where the owner cut operating costs by 25-30% by integrating HVAC with the structural

    system.

    U.S. Navy Pacific Command Center: A military command center in Oahu, HI, where the owner was

    able to get the project back in budget and on schedule with a unique and economical structural

    system to resist earthquakes, hurricanes and progressive collapse from terrorist acts.

    Summit Place: A constructive reuse where a vintage heavy manufacturing plant near Milwaukee,

    WI, was converted into offices affording the developer a competitive advantage in the office market.

    Virtually all the original steel structure was reused.

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    5/16

    OWNER: Development Resources, Inc.

    ARCHITECT: OWP/P

    STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: OWP/P Structures

    MECHANICAL ENGINEER: Environmental Systems Design

    GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Power Construction Company

    STEEL ERECTOR: Gatwood Steel Erection

    CHALLENGE:Provide a structure that accommodates

    changing tenant needs.

    SOLUTION 1:Take advantage of structural steel span

    capabilities by eliminating interior columns located

    between the core and exterior of the building.

    The ability to economically achieve spans up to 46 ft

    created an open floor area exceeding 33,000 sq ft

    per floor. This appeals to a greater number of poten-

    tial tenants who want maximum freedom for space

    planning as well as comfort for their employees. And

    advanced design methodologies are allowing longer

    spans and maximizing comfort with the elimination of

    perceptible vibrations.

    SOLUTION 2:Take advantage of the ease of

    modification inherent with a structural steel system.

    Building owners and managers are always faced

    with changing requirements and a compositesteel frame can easily be modified to satisfy exist-

    ing or new tenant changing requirements such as

    increased floor loads for storage and equipment,

    new openings for mechanical equipment and verti-

    cal shafts or floor-to-floor staircases. Within the four

    years since its opening in 2001, Congress Center

    has required several dozen structural modifications

    in order to meet changing tenant requirements.

    www.aisc.org/office_projects

    CHALLENGE:Minimize construction costs.

    SOLUTION 1:Integrate structural steel with

    mechanical services to reduce floor-to-floor heights.

    Structural and mechanical designers working closelytogether coordinated structural and mechanical

    requirements so that shop-fabricated web penetra-

    tions could be used for the passage of fire protection,

    mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems within

    the depth of the girders. This resulted in a savings of

    at least 1 ft in floor depth while providing tenants 9-ft

    ceiling heights. This drove down associated costs of

    enclosure systems, partition and vertical building sys-

    tems by more than $30,000 per foot or nearly half a

    million dollars for the whole building.

    SOLUTION 2:Maximize spans between structural floor

    elements to reduce construction time.

    A 51/4-in. composite metal floor deck increased

    spacing of structural beams to 16 ft on-center. By

    increasing the span of the composite floor system,

    fewer structural beams were required which reduced

    fabrication as well as erection time. The building was

    completed quicker and a positive revenue stream was

    generated earlier giving the developer a higher return

    on investment.

    Structural steel offers developer maximum cost savings and office layout flexibility

    to gain a competitive advantage in the local office market.

    Located in Chicagos West Loop, this new 16-story, 529,000-sq-ft office building was built to meet the demand

    for new Class-A office space in the central business district. Because it was an investment property, the archi-

    tects had to work to a limited budget while still creating a building that would be a worthy addition to an area of

    the city enjoying rejuvenation.

    C O N G R E S S C E N T E R

    Ducts and cable

    trays throughwebs for reducedfloor/ceiling depth

    46-ft clear span:

    core-to-perimeter

    9-ft ceiling height

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    6/16

    G E N E R A L S E R V I C E S A D M I N I S T R A T I O N

    4

    In fact, even before design was finished, the GSA

    issued extensive modifications that required signifi-

    cant increases in floor loads and the addition of acolumn-free space for an auditorium. Principle bays

    now required a span in excess of 45 ft. Structural steel

    with a composite metal deck proved most economical

    with the use of W21 beams spanning 46 ft 2 in. on 10-

    ft centers and a composite deck comprised of a 3-in.

    metal deck and 31/4 in. of lightweight concrete topping.

    Girders spanned 30 ft between columns with some

    spans, at the exterior bays, spanning 40 ft 10 in.

    CHALLENGE:Meet a tight budget and schedule.

    SOLUTION: Structural steels ease of design, construc-

    tion speed and compatibility with other building sys-

    tems helps project meet schedule and budget goals.The project team worked out an aggressive schedule

    to design, construct, fit up and occupy the build-

    ing within the time frame demanded by the GSA.

    The team took advantage of sophisticated structural

    design software that facilitated 3-D modeling of

    changing design requirements and helped minimize

    the time to incorporate design changes. In spite of the

    mid-stream design changes, the structural steel and

    composite metal deck system provided the developer

    the only means to complete the project on time. It was

    completed on time and $100,000 below budget!

    CHALLENGE:Find an economical solution to prevent

    progressive collapse.

    SOLUTION:Rely on structural steels ductility to designa resilient and redundant structure.

    The building was to be used exclusively for administra-

    tive purposes and the perimeter was secure so the

    design criterion required only that elimination of any

    first-floor perimeter column would not cause even

    a partial collapse. A structural steel solution was

    both elegant and simple. The building was girdled

    between the first and second floors with W33 x 118

    beams spanning the 30-ft interior bays and 40-ft 10-in.

    end bays. These are attached to the perimeter col-

    umns with fully welded moment connections designed

    for the full plastic moment of the beams. To handle

    the scenario of a corner column being destroyed,a perimeter column was placed within 10 ft of the

    corners to eliminate the potential for a cantilever in

    excess of 40 ft.

    CHALLENGE:Provide a structure that can be easily

    modified to meet changing tenant requirements even

    during the middle of the design.

    SOLUTION:Use structural steel framing and composite

    metal deck to meet changing tenant requirements.

    The client foresaw the possibility of needing to make

    future modifications to both the structure and deck.

    Structural steel satisfies blast and progressive collapse criteria and offers owner

    maximum ability to adapt to future changes.

    This four-story 107,000-sq-ft Class-A office building located in Atlanta, GA, was developed and leased exclusive-

    ly to the General Services Administration and occupied by the Center for Disease Control. The urgent need of

    the GSA was a building that would easily accommodate future changes in use and layout at an aggressive rental

    rate. Challenging the project even further, a blast-resistant/anti-progressive collapse design criterion was added

    midway in the design process, due to the September 11 attack.

    OWNER: General Services Administration

    DEVELOPER: Highwood Properties

    ARCHITECT: Cooper Carry, Inc.

    STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Uzun & Case Engineers

    GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Brasfield & Gorrie

    STEEL FABRICATOR: Stein Steel

    STEEL ERECTOR: Composite Construction Services, Inc.

    Heavy beams (W33 x 118) forminganti-blast girdle around perimeter

    Fully welded moment connections

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    7/16

    N E W Y O R K S TAT E

    D E P A R T M E N T O F E N V I R O N M E N T A L C O N S E R V A T I O N

    CHALLENGE:Earn a LEED

    Silver Rating from the U.S.

    Green Building Council.

    SOLUTION:Take advantage of the green features

    of structural steel.The architect collaborated closely with the owner and

    mechanical engineer to integrate many green features

    into the design and construction of the building.

    A LEED consultant was also brought on board to help

    shepherd the project through the certification process

    by making a list of sustainable features that would

    contribute to the LEED credits required for certifica-

    tion. The LEED consultants recommendation to use

    structural steel contributed significantly and easily

    toward three LEED credits, including: use of materials

    with recycled content, local/regional use of materials

    and the reduction of construction waste. First, all struc-tural steel produced in the United States contains a

    minimum of 95 percent recycled content with an aver-

    age of 65 percent of post-consumer recycled content.

    Second, structural steel was fabricated and supplied

    by a fabricator located less than one hour from the

    project site, well within the 500-mile radius required

    under LEED 2.0. Finally, scrap structural steel is too

    valuable to be thrown into a landfill and virtually 100

    percent is recycled into new steel products.

    www.aisc.org/office_projects

    CHALLENGE:Meet a fast-track delivery schedule.

    SOLUTION:Capitalize on all-weather construction with

    structural steel.

    The construction of the structural frame is often on thecritical path of a project schedule. On this project it

    was evident the structure would have to be construct-

    ed during the winter months, increasing the poten-

    tial for weather related delays. Structural steel was

    selected to minimize this risk. In fact, the steel fabri-

    cator expedited the steel delivery, started fabrication

    early in October and steel erection proceeded swiftly

    late November through completion of the structure in

    mid-April. Structural steel was fabricated off-site in a

    controlled environment by a skilled labor force unaf-

    fected by changing weather conditions where quality

    and tolerance achievement was assured resulting in

    fewer field erection problems. The ability to be erect-

    ed year-round also benefited the project schedule.

    All-weather construction capabilities and sustainability advantages of structural

    steel help owner meet tight construction schedule and obtain LEED

    Silver Rating.

    When considering its new headquarters, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in

    Albany, NY, wanted it to be a model of environmental responsibility in design, construction and operation.

    As such, this 13-story, 500,000-sq-ft office satisfies the sustainable design standards to achieve a LEED

    (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Silver Rating by the U.S. Green Building Council.

    OWNER: Picotte Companies

    LESSEE: NYS Department of Environmental Conservation

    ARCHITECT: Woodward Connor Gillies & Seleman Architects

    LEED CONSULTANT: Steven Winter and Associates

    STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Selnick Harwood Engineers

    MECHANICAL ENGINEER: Quantum Engineering

    GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Beltrone Construction

    STEEL FABRICATOR/ERECTOR: Schenectady Steel, Inc.

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    8/16

    A D C T E L E C O M M U N I C AT I O N S

    6

    CHALLENGE:Eliminate passive fire protection on

    building structure to help achieve owner demands for

    an architectural statement.SOLUTION:Bring in a fire-engineering consultant

    to develop alternatives to traditional fire protection

    methods.

    Under the Minnesota State Building Code at the time

    (amended 1997 Uniform Building Code) the construc-

    tion type would have dictated passive fire protection

    on the exposed structural framing and composite floor

    assemblies. A fire-engineering consultant was brought

    in to conduct a performance-based fire protection

    analysis. Life safety, property protection and continu-

    ity of operation goals were established and translated

    into performance criteria. The consultant evaluated

    various fire protection design alternatives and ulti-mately proposed an overall system that included

    an enhanced quick response sprinkler system that

    washes the primary framing, a total coverage smoke

    detection and control system as well as a fire alarm

    system. The proposed systems eliminated the need for

    fire separation walls between buildings and spray-on

    fire protection on approximately 80% of the structure.

    While the original intent for eliminating the spray-on

    fire-proofing was for aesthetics, adding spray-on pro-

    tection could have meant as much as $500,000 to the

    owner.

    Fire-engineering and early steel fabricator involvement help owner make architectural

    statement with architecturally exposed structural steel at an economical cost.

    This world headquarters for a high-tech telecommunications company provides 500,000 sq ft of space on a 90-

    acre campus in Eden Prairie, MN. The three-story complex is comprised of buildings arranged in an irregular

    pattern, creating diversion and interest. The owner wanted to expose the steel structure, both inside and out, as

    a reflection of the high-tech nature of the companys work. The exposed structure thus is the major architectural

    statement of the complex.

    OWNER: ADC Telecommunications

    ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Hammel Green & Abrahamson

    FIRE ENGINEER: MountainStar Group

    GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Kraus-Anderson Construction Co.

    STEEL FABRICATOR: LeJeune Steel Co.

    STEEL ERECTOR: Amerect, Inc.

    Sprinkler coverage of space

    Sprinkler washing of primary framing

    CHALLENGE:Make maximum use of architecturally

    exposed structural steel while avoiding

    unnecessary costs.SOLUTION:Bring a steel fabricator on board early and

    integrate the fabricator with the design team during

    the design phase of the project.

    Getting a qualified steel fabricator on board during the

    early phases of the design and integrating him with

    the design team always results in a more economical

    structure. ADC Telecommunications proved to be no

    exception. A steel fabricator was brought on board at

    the beginning of the design process to work closely

    with the architect and engineer. Fabricator integration

    into the design team helped to keep the visions of the

    designers more in line with fabrication and erection

    practicalities resulting in many thousands of dollarssaved for the owner. For example, the fabricator had

    the time to manufacture and submit models, to clearly

    show that for some 700 trusses (14 ft in the air) it was

    not necessary to grind welds for appearance sake and

    that the structural strength of the welds was adequate.

    Further, they were able to show that expensive welded

    connections could be replaced with standard bolted

    truss-to-column connections and still meet the high

    aesthetic standards set by the architect. Finally, the

    fabricator worked with the structural engineer on vari-

    ous connections and other details to ensure more

    economical fabrication and erection costs while still

    achieving structural requirements.

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    9/16

    Continuous beamfor support of floors

    Continuous beamfor support of floors

    Break awaycolumn for blast

    B U R E A U O F I N D I A N A F F A I R S

    CHALLENGE:Provide a facility that would resist

    blast and progressive collapse.

    SOLUTION:Capitalize on steels ductility and design a

    redundant structure.

    Structural steel with its superior ductility, strength andability to accommodate blast load induced deforma-

    tion reversals proved to meet all owner design expec-

    tations. In addition, steels high strength-to-weight

    ratio provided the added bonus of a lighter more eco-

    nomical foundation.

    The owner had two specific security requirements.

    First, any perimeter column over the three floors could

    be removed and allow the collapse of a single bay up

    through the three floors. However, horizontal progres-

    sion was permitted. The structural engineer oversized

    the connections on the inboard side of the interior col-

    umns so if the beam in the exterior bay pulled away,the interior would remain intact. Second, if any ground

    floor column were removed in the lobby area, the floor

    and structure above would remain intact. Using elas-

    tic analysis the engineers applied a load factor taking

    into account impact loads from the reversal of the

    floor above after the blast. Beam-to-column moment

    connections were developed to the full capacity of

    the beams.

    www.aisc.org/office_projects

    CHALLENGE:Meet a fast-track schedule.

    SOLUTION:Work with a steel specialty contractor that

    assumes total responsibility for the structural steel

    scope and uses new interoperable software.

    The design-build contractor worked closely with asteel specialty contractor that assumed total respon-

    sibility for the scope of the structural steel package.

    The steel team, including a structural engineer, detail-

    er, steel fabricator and erector under its umbrella,

    worked closely together to shave two months from

    the overall project schedule. Helping to drive this

    significant schedule reduction was the use of interop-

    erable design, detailing and fabrication software that

    facilitated seamless transfer of a 3-D structural model

    into detailing software and ultimately into automated

    CNC fabrication equipment. Use of the software pro-

    vided the general contractor with more timely budgets

    and schedule information and ultimately cut the time

    required to convert the final design into fabricated

    components.

    Steel specialty contractor, using new interoperable software, eliminates two months

    from the construction schedule to help owner occupy building sooner.

    The new regional headquarters for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is a three-story 140,000-sq-ft building

    located in Albuquerque, NM. The owner had expiring leases in diverse locations and desired to consolidate their

    activities in a new office as quickly as possible and within strict budgetary limitations.

    OWNER: Bureau of Indian Affairs

    DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR: OPUS West Construction Corp.

    ARCHITECT: DCSW Architects, Inc.

    STEEL TEAM

    STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Chaves-Grieves Consulting Engineers. Inc.

    STEEL FABRICATOR/ERECTOR: AmFab, Incorporated

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    10/16

    J P M O R G A N C H A S E & C O .

    8

    CHALLENGE:Satisfy the heightened California

    seismic requirements.

    SOLUTION:Use a proven and redundant system

    with reduced beam section moment connections.

    In order to resist Zone 4 seismic forces, a lateral loadresisting system was provided in both directions. Along

    the short direction, two 3-bay frames consisting of

    33-in.-deep ductile outrigger beams with moment

    connections to interior and exterior columns and four

    braced frames between the core columns were pro-

    vided. In the long direction, two 3-bay ductile moment

    frames along exterior sides and two braced frames

    along core walls were provided. All beam-to-column

    moment connections used the reduced beam section

    or dog-bone, which had been tested and pre-qualified

    for the maximum beam size used.

    CHALLENGE:Provide a maximum of column-free spacefor layout flexibility.

    SOLUTION:Use sloping columns and composite steel

    floor system.The developer wanted to be able to

    offer tenants complete freedom for space planning.

    By sloping the columns to make up for the setbacks

    in the exterior walls the lateral load resisting system

    could be accommodated within the perimeter framing.

    Furthermore, this avoided the interference of transfer

    girders. That and the floor system of a 51/4-in. compos-

    ite slab on metal deck spanning 10 ft between com-

    posite steel beams, which in turn span 43 ft, mean

    that there are no columns between the office core andthe exterior walls.

    CHALLENGE:Keep floor depth to a minimum as a way

    of reducing cost.

    SOLUTION:Notch the floor beams.

    The developer was looking for ways to control

    costs. Close coordination between the structural and

    mechanical designers led to notching the 33-in.-deep

    outrigger beams near mid-span for the passage of

    main ducts. This reduced the floor-to-floor height by

    more than a foot. When considering the cost of curtain

    wall, structural steel, vertical shafts and mechanical

    services, each vertical foot was worth approximately

    $45,000 or $1,250,000 net savings for the whole proj-

    ect.

    CHALLENGE:Meet unique structural challenges posed

    by the architecture.

    SOLUTION:Utilize sloping exterior columns to create

    the building setbacks as desired.

    The building of rectangular shape, has two setbacks

    on long sides one at level 8 and another at level

    28. The normal way of supporting setback columns

    on transfer girders is not desirable in high seismic

    areas. This challenge was met by sloping the col-

    umns to make up for the offsets. These columns

    result in horizontal elements at levels 6, 8, 27 and 28.

    These beams are connected to the columns with pins

    thereby eliminating any uncertainty of behavior at the

    beam-to-column joints. The sloping columns at the

    two outrigger frames are of box shape common to

    frames in both directions.

    Structural steel lowers floor-to-floor heights saving developer $1,250,000.

    Built by a prominent developer, designed by a world-renown architect and located in the heart of San Francisco

    this 31-story Class-A building houses the West Coast headquarters of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Its almost 670,000

    sq ft include two levels of underground parking and are complemented by a large ground level plaza and urban

    park. The design is modern and complements the skyline with classical elegance. The exterior wall design is a

    delicately proportioned tower of glass with a lush green aluminum frame.

    OWNER: JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    DEVELOPER: Hines

    ARCHITECT OF RECORD: Cesar Pelli and Associates

    PRODUCTION ARCHITECT: Kendall-Heaton Associates

    STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: CBM Engineers

    GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Turner Construction

    STEEL FABRICATOR/ERECTOR: Strocal, Inc.

    Sloped columns avoidingtransfer girders/trusses

    Pre-approved dog-bonehigh seismic section

    Notched and reinforcedbeams for reducedfloor-to-floor height

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    11/16

    C N F T R A N S P O R T AT I O N , I N C .

    floor heights were reduced as much as 18 in. due to

    elimination of the traditional HVAC plenum that typi-

    cally runs below the beams. With the more traditional

    approaches, the additional material cost of steel col-umns, masonry, glazing and vertical shafts could eas-

    ily have added $200,000 to the cost of construction.

    An additional savings was realized due to the unique

    mechanical design that resulted in less expensive

    equipment as well as the minimization of horizontal

    ductwork.

    CHALLENGE:Minimize cost of future changes in office

    layout.

    SOLUTION:Use structural steel framing with a raised

    access floor.

    As work teams change, and departments grow and

    shrink, the under-floor system minimizes the disruptionand cost of demolition and construction to move wiring

    and cabling. In addition, the steel structure can easily

    be modified to accommodate changes in floor loads,

    and the addition of floor openings among other things.

    The unique cellular beam design, with web openings

    running along the length will facilitate ease of installing

    new MEP systems as needed in the future.

    www.aisc.org/office_projects

    CHALLENGE:Create an office that reduces (energy)

    operating costs.

    SOLUTION:Integrate structural and mechanical

    systems for maximum efficiency.Close cooperation between the structural engineer,

    mechanical engineer and the steel contractor led to

    a unique mechanical system that took advantage of

    the steel structure itself. A raised access floor act-

    ing as both a space for power, voice and data whips

    and under-floor air path was combined with a cellular

    beam structure/ceiling assembly that created a return

    air plenum. The web openings in the cellular beams

    allowed for the free flow of used air to ceiling-mount-

    ed water-source heat pumps. This mechanical/struc-

    tural integration in combination with a southern build-

    ing orientation and high efficiency glazing reduced

    energy consumption by 30 percent less than required

    by the State of Oregon Energy Code or approximately

    $64,000 in savings per year.

    CHALLENGE:Minimize construction costs.

    SOLUTION:Use cellular beams to reduce floor-to-floor

    heights to cut cladding and vertical MEP costs.

    Use of cellular beams allowed for economical long

    spans as well as facilitated free airflow and the pas-

    sage of miscellaneous other mechanicals such as

    sprinkler pipes through the web openings that ran

    continuously along the member lengths. Floor-to-

    Innovative integration of structural and HVAC systems contributes to approximately

    $64,000 in annual energy savings as well as over $200,000 during construction.

    The 250,000-sq-ft center is a five-story headquarters of an international transportation and logistics conglomer-

    ate located in Portland, OR. As the world headquarters and nerve center, the facility is open 24/7 and back-up

    systems are designed to allow operations to continue even under a loss of city or first phase back-up power. The

    progressive and image-conscious owner wanted a facility that was functional yet environmentally sensitive.

    Raised access floor

    Space for under-floorair path

    Cellular beams allow-ing for mechanical passthroughs and easy

    circulation of air

    Cellular beams clear spancore to perimeter

    OWNER: CNF Transportation

    ARCHITECT: GBD Architects

    STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: KPFF Engineers

    MECHANICAL ENGINEER: Glumac International

    GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Hoffman Construction

    STEEL CONTRACTOR: R.F. Stearns, Inc.

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    12/16

    U. S. N A V Y PA C I F I C C O M M A N D C E N T E R

    10

    CHALLENGE:Further reduce cost while satisfying addi-

    tional Department of Defenses blast and

    progressive collapse requirements.

    SOLUTION:Use SidePlateTM

    connection technology

    to reduce structure and foundation costs, resist windand seismic loads and prevent progressive collapse.

    The team with the structural steel proposal went back

    to the drawing boards. The AT/FP progressive col-

    lapse criteria, most simply stated, specified that any

    single column in any location could be removed

    and the surrounding structure had to remain intact.

    To meet new requirements, a novel and cost-effec-

    tive type of connection was proposed for the Pacific

    Command Center. An innovative moment connection,

    by SidePlateTM

    Systems, Incorporated, strategically

    placed throughout the structure, provided an all-steel

    system with enhanced redundancy and ductility that

    exceeded wind and seismic requirement and met

    all the Navys security requirements as well. The

    proposed system cut nearly $4 million dollars off the

    steel package and resulted in budget and schedule

    requirements being achieved.

    CHALLENGE:Bring a critical project back into

    budget and schedule.

    SOLUTION:Use design-build project delivery with struc-

    tural steel.

    The U.S. Navy, in order to get a new facility designedand built as quickly as possible, issued a Request

    for Proposal (RFP) from several design-build teams.

    Working with an architect, they issued bridging docu-

    ments that included a mix of cast-in-place and pre-

    cast concrete with a pre-stressed concrete floor slab.

    Teams could submit other solutions as long as they

    met the Navys performance criteria including a blast-

    resistant faade. Teams were allowed three months to

    respond.

    Structural steel is inherently more ductile than con-

    crete and that material property can be used to

    advantage in resisting blast loadings. Designing duc-tility into the structural frame can give it a significant

    advantage in handling the load reversals that are

    characteristic of a bomb blast. In addition, a structural

    frame is lighter which saves foundation costs and is

    very cost-effective in meeting seismic design provi-

    sions.

    One of the design-build teams took advantage of this

    and proposed a structural steel system that saved

    several million dollars over the concrete design but

    fell short of meeting budget goal. At this point, the

    U.S. Navy added Anti-terrorism/Force Protection (AT/

    FP) blast and progressive collapse requirements andasked for revised proposals.

    Design-build and unique steel connection system eliminates over $4,500,000

    in costs and meets stringent design criteria for earthquake, wind, blast and

    progressive collapse.

    This six-story 320,000-sq-ft building, located in Oahu, HI, is the headquarters for the U.S. Navy Pacific

    Command. As originally designed in concrete, the project was significantly over budget.

    OWNER: Department of the Navy

    BRIDGING ARCHITECT: Wimberly Allison Tong and Goo

    DESIGN-BUILD TEAM

    DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR: Dick Pacific Construction Co.

    ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF RECORD: Atkins/Benham Group

    ASSOC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Baldridge & Associates Structural Engineering,

    BLAST CONSULTANT: Weidlinger AssociatesSTEEL FABRICATOR: Brooklyn Iron Works, Inc.

    STEEL ERECTOR: Swanson Steel Company, Inc.

    SidePlateTM

    connection

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    13/16

    S U M M I T P L A C E

    In the open high bays up to three additional floors

    were inserted. These bays formerly contained 300-ton

    capacity bridge cranes. The crane rails were removed

    and sold and the remaining crane beams were relo-

    cated onto new haunches to support new insert

    floors. While structural steel can be easily reinforced

    to handle higher loads, office loads were so much

    lower than the original industrial load requirements

    that the structure did not have to be reinforced in any

    way. To accommodate new mechanical ductwork,

    web openings in existing girders were field fabricated

    and reinforced. Existing roof framing was left exposed

    as a clear expression of the buildings bones.

    Existing skylights were also repaired and upgradedto provide lots of natural light and increase office pro-

    ductivity.

    CHALLENGE:Create a dramatic modern gateway

    to the existing buildings.

    SOLUTION:Add a four-story addition to the front

    of the manufacturing buildings.

    The addition and its atrium comprise 44,000 sq ft of

    Class-A space. This created a grand and modern

    entrance and served as a transition to the remodeled

    industrial buildings behind.

    www.aisc.org/office_projects

    CHALLENGE:Convert three abandoned manufacturing

    buildings into modern offices.

    SOLUTION:Rely on the adaptability of the steel struc-

    ture to reuse it completely.

    The reuse of the existing buildings was less costly

    than building new on a green field site. Doing so

    benefits the environment by eliminating resources

    required to tear down the building and transport the

    non-steel material to a scrap yard or to produce and

    transport new material to the job site. Furthermore,

    one avoids the waste of abandoning an old site as

    well as the energy and materials required to develop

    a new site.

    Working closely with the architect and structural

    engineer, the developer looked at the palette of avail-

    able features; solid brick walls, ceiling heights from

    9 ft to over 26 ft, up to 17-ft-high windows, 500-ft-long

    skylights, up to 83,000-sq-ft floor plates combined

    with large column-free spaces and exposed structural

    framing. Combining these features with the addition of

    new windows, electrical power, modern HVAC, eleva-

    tors and escalators readily brought the project up to

    modern day standards.

    Structural steel frames in three 70 year-old industrial buildings form the backbone

    of a cost-effective conversion into an office complex with Class-A amenities.

    The creation of a company over 100 years ago gave rise to the town of West Allis near Milwaukee, WI that

    became a center for heavy manufacturing in Milwaukee. The demise of the company, Allis-Chalmers, in the

    late 1980s meant the loss of over 15,000 jobs and the shuttering of nearly two million sq ft of historic industrial

    buildings. Slightly more than half of the floor area was demolished (with many materials being land-filled and

    steel being recycled into other steel products) leaving approximately 900,000 sq ft standing. In 2002 a former

    employee turned developer decided there might be new life for those old bones that could spark a renaissance

    of West Allis as a newly invigorated community.

    DEVELOPER: Whitnall Summit, LLC

    ARCHITECT: Renner Architects

    STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: SRI Design

    GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Selzer-Ornst

    STEEL FABRICATOR: Ace Iron & Steel Corp.

    STEEL ERECTOR: Dannys Construction Company, Inc.

    STEEL FABRICATOR/ERECTOR: Construction Supply & Erection, Inc.

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    14/16

    12

    The demands of the 21st century present new challenges to every office building owner, developer,

    designer and construction professional. Challenges demand ingenuity, creativity and innovative solu-

    tions. This brochure introduced you to many of those 21st century challenges and how some of them

    were addressed through innovative uses of structural steel. In doing so, office structures were built more

    economically and quickly while still maintaining quality and future flexibility to ensure profitability.

    Since the beginning of modern steel construction in the 1880s structural steel has grown to be the

    material of choice in office construction. Not only are the benefits of Cost, Speed, Qualityand Marketability available to every owner, but new and innovative approaches to the design chal-lenges of the 21st century abound with steel.

    The possibilities for economical and technically sound solutions in steel are many. And the good news is

    there is an easy way to find them. The AISC Steel Solutions Center, staffed with engineers experienced

    in all phases and types of construction, is available to assist you to determine what the best structural

    system is, how much will it cost and how long will it take to build. This assistance is provided for you free

    of cost for all types of buildings including: offices, parking structures, hospitals, apartments, as well as

    hotels. The Steel Solutions Center is there to make structural steel easier for you to use so do not hesi-

    tate to call for any issue related to structural steel including: material specifications, coatings, fire protec-

    tion, vibration, seismic design, blast-resistant design, connections, or construction feasibility. If you are a

    designer, there are even free tools available to make your job easier and better.

    Help is but a few keystrokes or a short phone call away at the AISC Steel Solutions Center:

    1-866-ASK-AISC (866-275-2472)

    or

    [email protected]

    Congress CenterPage 3

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    15/16

    stru

    ctur

    alste

    el

    JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    Page 8

    Summit Place

    Page 11

  • 8/3/2019 Aisc - Office Buildings

    16/16

    There's always a solution in steel!

    AISC Marketing, LLC.One East Wacker Drive, Suite 700Chicago, Illinois 60601-1802

    866.ASK.AISC www.aisc.org

    Interested in knowing more about why a structural steel frame is the

    best option for your next office building?

    Please visit our web site www.aisc.org/office_projects for a

    detailed look at the projects and topics highlighted in this brochure.

    You are also invited to contact the AISC Steel Solutions Center at

    866.ASK.AISC or [email protected] to discuss how these

    solutions can be applied to capture the benefits of structural steel on

    your next project.

    Item F044-06(2/05:15M:ADV)