29
Airborne LIDAR Airborne LIDAR The Technology The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote Sensing Center Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison

Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Airborne LIDARAirborne LIDARThe TechnologyThe Technology

Slides adapted from a talk given by

Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc.

Frank L.ScarpaceProfessor

Environmental Remote Sensing CenterCivil and Environmental Engineering

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Page 2: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

• Background of LIDAR

• Brief Technical Description

• Quality Control/Assurance Procedures

• LIDAR Data Characteristics

• Processing LIDAR Data (2 Steps)

• Data Set Characteristics

Page 3: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

BACKGROUND

• LIDAR (Light Detection And Ranging)– 30 Year Old Technology– Became Cost Effective Very Recently

• System Components– Laser Scanner, ABGPS, IMU, Precise Clock

(Multiple Planes of Reference)

– Robust Computer Support– Requires Calibration (Bore Sighting)

Page 4: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

BACKGROUND• Capacity to Capture Multiple Return Values /

Pulse– Derive many, many X, Y, Z Values

– Positional Data and Intensity Data• Multiple Configurations Possible

– Remarkably Large Data Files

• Accuracy– Standard Deviation 15-20 cm

– Vertical RMSE at 20 cm on Discrete ‘Hard Hit’ Points

– Horizontal Accuracy at 2X the ‘Footprint” Size

Page 5: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Oscillating Mirror Scan Pattern

Rotating Mirror Scan Pattern

Page 6: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

LIDAR has Multiple Return

Page 7: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

POINT CLOUD OF ALL LIDAR POINTS IN DOUGLAS FIR FOREST

Page 8: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

LIDAR &Terrain Interaction

• For example; a calm still lake, will only reflect energy back within a few degrees of the nadir beam of the laser.

• A “wavy” lake on the other hand, will reflect energy back from wider incident angles.

• Diffuse surfaces (ground or tree) reflect energy back omnidirectionaly.

Page 9: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

LIDAR Intensity Collection

Page 10: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Laser Intensity Raster - Detail

Page 11: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote
Page 12: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

TIN surface of Raw LIDAR Data

Page 13: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

‘Raw’ FIRST Return LIDAR Data

Page 14: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Raw LAST Return LIDAR Data

Page 15: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

• Automatic programs begin the noise and vegetation/surface feature removal process

• These remove approximately 80% of vegetation (depending on the land cover and terrain characteristics)

• This part typically uses about 20% of the vegetation removal time budget

Automatic Vegetation Removal

Page 16: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Trend Surface AnalysisGreen Points = Vegetation Brown Points = Trend Surface

Page 17: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Before

Page 18: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

...after

Page 19: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

• Final vegetation and feature removal requires manual intervention.

• Custom selection routines are used in 3D and GIS Software to analyze the data and identify target points.

• Accurate interpretation of the LIDAR data requires supporting imagery.

• Removal of the remaining 20% of the vegetation and features will account for about 80% of the time budget

Manual Editing

Page 20: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

...after

Page 21: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

…final

Page 22: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

LIDAR vs. Traditional Mapping1”=100’ Scale Terrain Mapping Example

Compiled Mass Points are more widely spaced: 60 feet vs. 12 feet.

Compiled DTMs use breaklines; LIDAR usually does not (breaklines can be added from photogrammetric techniques).

Compiler can place points; LIDAR is indiscriminate.

Compiler must be able to SEE THE GROUND, LIDAR is self-illuminating & ‘looks’ down into the vegetation.

Page 23: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Typical Wooded Area Example

Page 24: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Detail with LIDAR Ground Points

Page 25: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Processed TIN Surface

Page 26: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

• Contours are a cartographic construct used to visualize topography.

• Contours produced directly from the LIDAR TIN are usually not aesthetically pleasing.

• LIDAR data can be converted into a DEM Grid at the nominal post spacing which retains fidelity to the original data and which appropriately smoothes the contours.

DEM and Contour Generation

Page 27: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Contours Generated from the DSM

Page 28: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Contours Generated from the DEM

Page 29: Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote

Conclusions

• LIDAR is a powerful new technology for determining terrain elevations.

• There are still questions as to the horizontal accuracy.

• Appears to be a good companion technology to the existing photogrammetric methods of measuring terrain.