27
1 Air Quality and Health Co-Benefits of a Carbon Fee-and-Rebate Bill in Massachusetts Jonathan J. Buonocore, Sc.D. Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Renzo R. Guinto, M.D. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Jonathan I. Levy, Sc.D. Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health Scott Nystrom, M.A. FTI Consulting, Regional Economic Models, Incorporated Chris Brown, B.A. Regional Economic Models, Incorporated Aaron S. Bernstein, M.D. MPH. Boston Children’s Hospital and Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

1

AirQualityandHealthCo-BenefitsofaCarbonFee-and-RebateBillinMassachusettsJonathanJ.Buonocore,Sc.D.CenterforHealthandtheGlobalEnvironment,HarvardT.H.ChanSchoolofPublicHealthRenzoR.Guinto,M.D.HarvardT.H.ChanSchoolofPublicHealth

JonathanI.Levy,Sc.D.DepartmentofEnvironmentalHealth,BostonUniversitySchoolofPublicHealthScottNystrom,M.A.FTIConsulting,RegionalEconomicModels,Incorporated

ChrisBrown,B.A.RegionalEconomicModels,IncorporatedAaronS.Bernstein,M.D.MPH.BostonChildren’sHospitalandCenterforHealthandtheGlobalEnvironment,HarvardT.H.ChanSchoolofPublicHealth

Page 2: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

2

ExecutiveSummaryTwobillshavebeenintroducedintheMassachusettslegislature–S.1821AnActCombatingClimateChange(Barrett2017),andH.1726AnActtoPromoteGreenInfrastructure,ReduceGreenhouseGasEmissions,andCreateJobs(Benson2017).Bothbillswouldputafeeongreenhousegasemissions,exceptforthosefromelectricalgeneration.RevenuecollectedfromthefeeinS.1821wouldbedepositedinafundsequesteredfromgeneralrevenue,fromwhichallresidentsandemployersinMassachusettswouldreceivearebate,withaslightlyhigherrebategoingtoresidentsofruralareassinceresidentsoftheseareasdrivemore.TwentypercentoftherevenuefromH.1726wouldgointoa“greeninfrastructurefund”thatwouldsupportdevelopmentintransportation,climateresilience,energyefficiency,andrenewableenergy.TheremainingrevenuewouldbereturnedtoresidentsofMassachusettsasrebates,weightedtowardlower-incomehouseholdsandruralresidents;employerswouldreceiverebatesbasedontheirnumberofemployees.Thesetwobills,directedatmitigatinggreenhousegasemissions,mayalsoprovidesubstantialco-benefitstohealth,similartomanyothereffortstoreducegreenhousegasemissions.AproposedMassachusettscarbonfeemayyieldhealthbenefitsbyreducingemissionsofairpollutantslikefineparticulatematter(PM2.5),nitrogenoxides(NOx),volatileorganiccompounds(VOCs),andsulfurdioxide(SO2),whichareemittedwhenfossilfuelsareburned.Exposuretoairpollutioncanhaveavarietyofhealtheffects,includingprematuremortality(Romanetal2008),heartattacks(Madriganoetal2013,Mustafić2012b),hospitaladmissionsforrespiratoryandcardiovasculardisease(Zanobettietal2009,Levyetal2012b),asthmaexacerbations(Andersonetal2013),stroke(Shinetal2014),lostdaysofschoolandwork(LeiChen,BrianL.Jennison,WeiYa2000,Gillilandetal2001),andpossiblyautismspectrumdisorder(Talbottetal2015)andAlzheimer’sdisease(Jungetal2015,Cacciottoloetal2016).Here,webuildamodeltocalculatethehealthco-benefitsthatwouldresultfromacarbonfeeinMassachusetts.Theframeworkofthismodelissimilartomodelsusedforpreviousco-benefitsstudies(Buonocoreetal2015,2016b,Thompsonetal2012,Saarietal2015,Thompsonetal2016,Levyetal2016,Plachinskietal2014),anduseswell-establishedvaluesandmethodsfrompriorresearch(Pennetal2017,Levyetal2016,Driscolletal2015,Buonocoreetal2016a).Thismodelcombinestheresultsofaneconomicmodelofthefueluseandcarbonemissionsreductionsthatwouldresultfromthisrule(Breslowetal2014,NystromandZaidi2013a),emissionsdatafromtheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2017),healthimpactfunctionsfromthescientificliterature(Levyetal2016,Pennetal2017,Driscolletal2015),andstandardhealthbenefitvaluationmetrics(Dockinsetal2004).Wemodeltheco-benefitsofacarbonfeeconsistentwiththefeeschedulespecifiedinS.1821thatstartsat$10/ton,andincreasesby$5peryearuntilitreachesa

Page 3: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

3

plateauof$40perton.Wefindthefollowingcumulativebenefitsfromarulewiththisstructurefromanimplementationyearof2017through2040:

• 340livessaved• 26respiratoryhospitalizationsavoided• 28cardiovascularhospitalizationsavoided• 20heartattacksavoided• $2.9billion($2017USD)ofcumulativehealthbenefitsbetween2017and

2040,worth$2.0billion($2017USD)ifdiscountedto2017at3%peryearAdditionalbenefitsfromreductioninairpollutionemissionswerenotquantifiedhere.Theseincludereductionsinasthmaattacks(Jacqueminetal2015,Braueretal2002,Andersonetal2013),fewerlostdaysofschoolandwork(LeiChen,BrianL.Jennison,WeiYa2000,Gillilandetal2001),prematurebirthandlowbirthweight(Kloogetal2012,Darrowetal2011,Lietal2016),autismspectrumdisorder(Talbottetal2015)andAlzheimer’sdisease(Jungetal2015,Cacciottoloetal2016),alongwithbenefitstocropproductivity,farming,forestry,andreductionsinacidrain(CommitteeonHealth,Environmental2010,ChestnutandMills2005,Wittigetal2007,JosephE.Aldyetal1999).Theresultsindicatethatthehealthco-benefitsofacarbonfeeinMassachusettscanbesubstantial,eventhoughthepolicywasnotdesignedasapublichealthmeasure.Theannualhealthbenefitsofthecarbonfeegrowasthecarbonfeerises,andpeaksin2035withthisfeeschedule.Thisworkprovidesfurtherevidencetothegrowingbodyofresearchdemonstratingthatpoliciesdesignedtomitigateclimatechangecanalsoproducesubstantialhealthco-benefits(Siler-Evansetal2013,Plachinskietal2014,Saarietal2015,Thompsonetal2016,Driscolletal2015).Understandingthesehealthco-benefitscanbeimportanttopolicydecisionsandpolicydesign,sincehealthco-benefitsofclimatepoliciescanbeapowerfulmotivatorforaction,duetothefactthatthebenefitsoccurintheshort-term(Bainetal2015,Petrovicetal2014).Additionally,sincethehealthco-benefitsgenerallybeginimmediatelyafteremissionsreductionstakeplaceandinthesameregionastheemissionsreductions,theseconsiderationscanbecomequiterelevantforthedecision-makingprocess,especiallyforstateandlocaldecision-makers(Driscolletal2015,Buonocoreetal2015,2016b,Siler-Evansetal2013,Westetal2013,Nemetetal2010).

Page 4: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

4

BackgroundInAugustof2008,theGlobalWarmingSolutionsAct(GWSA)wassignedintolawinMassachusetts(MassachusettsExecutiveOfficeofEnergyandEnvironmentalAffairs2017a).TheGWSArequiresMassachusettstoachievea10-25%reductionofgreenhousegas(GHG)emissionsreductionsbelow1990levelsby2020,andan80%reductionbelow1990levelsby2050(MassachusettsExecutiveOfficeofEnergyandEnvironmentalAffairs2017a).Massachusetts’mostrecentGHGemissioninventorydemonstratesthatMassachusettshasmadeprogressinachievingitsGHGreductiongoalssince2006.Thestateemitted75.8milliontonsofCO2-equivalent(CO2e)in2013,a19.7%reductioninemissionssince1990,withallsectorsexceptforthecommercialsectorachievingreductionscomparedtobusinessasusualprojections(MassachusettsExecutiveOfficeofEnergyandEnvironmentalAffairs2017b).TwobillsthatwouldplaceafeeoncarbondioxideandotherGHGemissionshavebeenintroducedintheMassachusettslegislature–S.1821AnActCombatingClimateChange(Barrett2017),andH.1726AnActtoPromoteGreenInfrastructure,ReduceGreenhouseGasEmissions,andCreateJobs(Benson2017).ThesetwobillswouldplaceafeeonGHGemissionsfromfossilfuelconsumptioninthestate,exceptfortheiruseforelectricitygenerationandassistinattainingMassachusetts’GHGemissiongoals(Barrett2017,Benson2017).UnderS.1821,thefeewouldstartat$10pertonCO2e,andincreaseby$5peryear,untilitreachesafeeof$40pertonCO2e(Barrett2017).TherevenuegeneratedfromfeesfromhouseholdusewouldfundarebatepaidtoallMassachusettsresidents,withruralresidentsreceivingahighermotorvehiclefuelrebatesincetheyaremorereliantonvehiclesfortransportation(Barrett2017).UnderH.1726,thefeewouldstartat$20pertonCO2e,andincreaseat$5pertonCO2euntilitreaches$40pertonCO2e(Benson2017).Underthisbill,therevenuegeneratedfromhousehold-relatedfeeswouldbesplit:20%wouldgointoagreeninfrastructurefund,whichwouldsupporttransportationdevelopment,climateresilience,energyefficiencyandrenewableenergy,andtheremainderwouldbedistributedtoallMassachusettsresidents,withgreaterallotmentsforlower-incomeresidents,ruralresidents,andlow-incomeenergyassistance.Inbothbills,feesduetosalestobusinessesandotheremployerswouldbereturnedtothissector,inproportiontonumberofemployees,exceptthatunderH.172620%wouldgotoagreeninfrastructurefund.Thefeessetupbyeachbillwouldlargelybeincurredbycarbonemissionsfromfueluseinthetransportationsector,alongwithheatingfueluseincommercial,residential,andindustrialbuildings.InadditiontoGHGs,fueluseintransportationandbuildingsalsoproducesairpollution,whichharmshumanhealthandthe

Page 5: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

5

environment.Thisstudymodelstheavertedairpollutionemissions,andassociatedhealthdamagesthatwouldarisefromtheproposedcarbonfee.

TheHealthImpactsofAirPollutionReductionsinfossilfuelusecanreduceGHGemissionsaswellasreleaseofharmfulairpollutants(Fannetal2013,2012a,2012b),includingsulfurdioxide(SO2),nitrogenoxides(NOx),volatileorganiccompounds(VOCs),fineparticulatematter(PM2.5),andothers.Someofthesechemicalsreacttoformgroundlevelozone,commonlyknownassmog.Thesepollutantsalsocontributetoacidrain,impaircropandtimberproductivity,anddamageecosystems(Wittigetal2007,JosephE.Aldyetal1999,CommitteeonHealth,Environmental2010,ChestnutandMills2005).Whilethisreportfocusesonthehealthbenefitsfromreductionsintheseotherpollutants,ecosystembenefitswouldalsobeexpectedwithreductionsinthesepollutants.Exposuretoairpollutionhasbeenassociatedwithmanyhealtheffects,includingthefollowing:

• Prematuremortality(Romanetal2008,Schwartzetal2008,Lepeuleetal2012,Krewskietal2009,PopeIIIandDockery2006)

• Heartattacks(Madriganoetal2013,Mustafić2012a)• Hospitaladmissionsduetorespiratorycauses(Zanobettietal2009,Levyet

al2012a)• Hospitalizationsduetocardiovascularcauses(Zanobettietal2009,Levyet

al2012a)• Asthmaexacerbations(Andersonetal2013)• Stroke(Shinetal2014)• Lostdaysofschoolandwork(LeiChen,BrianL.Jennison,WeiYa2000,

Gillilandetal2001)• Prematurebirthandlowbirthweight(Kloogetal2012,Darrowetal2011,Li

etal2016)• Autismspectrumdisorder(Talbottetal2015)andAlzheimer’sDisease(Jung

etal2015,Cacciottoloetal2016).ThehealthburdenofairpollutionfromfossilfuelsintheUnitedStatesissubstantial.IntheU.S.,thehealthburdenofairpollutionin2005wasbetween130,000and320,000prematuredeathsperyear(Fannetal2012b),largelyduetoemissionsfromgeneratingelectricity,vehicularexhaust,andareasourcessuchasmining,industry,andburningheatingfuels(Fannetal2013).From2005to2016,thecontributionsfromelectricitygenerationandmobilesourceemissionswereexpectedtodecreasesubstantiallyduetoregulatoryrequirementsandtechnologychange,whilecontributionsfromotherairpollutionsourceswereexpectedtostaythesameorrise(Fannetal2013).

Page 6: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

6

Arecentstudyestimatedthatburningfuelsforhomeheatingin2005contributedtoaround10,000excessdeathseachyearintheU.S.,andthatburningfuelsforelectricitycontributedtoaround21,000deathsannually(Pennetal2017).Thisstudyalsocalculatedthehealthburdenfromthesesourcesonastate-by-statebasis,andfoundthattheuseoffuelsinhomesinMassachusetts,mainlyforheating,isresponsiblefor390deathsyearly.Ofthese390deaths,64%(250)happenwithinMassachusetts,while36%occurredout-of-stateduetomigrationofairpollutionacrossstateborders(Pennetal2017).

HealthCo-BenefitsofGreenhouseGasReductionsPoliciesandprojectsareoftendevelopedwiththeintenttoreduceGHGemissionsthroughdisincentivizingfossilfuelconsumption.However,manystudieshaveshownthatthesepoliciescanalsoimproveneartermhealthoutcomesandconferso-calledhealth“co-benefits”.Examplesofpoliciesandprojectsaimedatgreenhousegasmitigationbutwhichalsoprovideco-benefitsrangefromcleanenergystandardsandcap-and-tradestandards(Thompsonetal2014,2016),tonational-scalecarbonemissionspolicies(Driscolletal2015,Buonocoreetal2016a),toimplementationofrenewableenergyandenergyefficiency(Buonocoreetal2015,2016b,Siler-evansetal2013).Healthbenefitsaccruefromreducedburdensofairpollutionassociateddisease,includingthepreviouslymentionedhealthimpacts.Whenquantified,theseco-benefitsmaybeimportanttodecisionsthatappearunfavorablebaseduponalimitedassessmentofclimatebenefits.Co-benefitsarebothnear-termandapplytotheregioninwhichactionsaretakentocurbGHGemissions.Theyextendbeyondhumanhealthandincludeimprovementstotimberandcropyields,asexamples(CuevasandHaines2016,Kennedyetal2015,Wattsetal2015,CommitteeonHealth,Environmental2010,ChestnutandMills2005).Inthisanalysis,wefocusonquantifyingco-benefitsfromavoidedmortality,heartattacks,andhospitalizationsfromrespiratoryandcardiovascularcauses.

TheHealthCo-benefitsofaCarbonEmissionsFeeinMassachusettsRegionalEconomicModels,Incorporated(REMI)hasperformedaseriesofanalysesontheeconomiceffectsofacarbonpriceinMassachusetts.(NystromandZaidi2013a,Breslowetal2014,Nystrom2016)ThemostrecentanalysismirrorsthecarbonfeescheduleovertimeinS.1821(Barrett2017),startingin2017.ItthenprojectstheresultingchangesinfuelconsumptionandGHGemissionsthrough

Page 7: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

7

2040.Thefeeschedulestartsat$10/tonin2017,andincreasesby$5/toneachyearuntilitreachesaplateaupriceof$40/tonin2023.Here,webuiltamodelusingtheoutputfromtheREMIanalysistoestimatethereductionsinemissionsofotherpollutants(SO2,NOx,VOCs,andPM2.5)thatwouldresultfromthefuelusereductionsfromtheproposedMassachusettscarbonfeebills,andtheconsequenthealthbenefitsofthesepollutionreductions.Tocalculatethepollutantemissionsreductionsfromthisrule,weusedtheU.S.EPANationalEmissionsInventory(NEI)datafor2014(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2017)toestimateSO2,NOx,PM2.5,andVOCemissionsfromthesesourceswithouttherule.Wematchedthe2014NEIemissionsdatatothe2014energyconsumptionfromtheREMIanalysisbysectorandfueltypes.WethenusedthisemissionsdatatocalculateastatewideaverageemissionsrateforPM2.5,SO2,NOx,andVOCs,andappliedthisacrossallmodeledyearstocalculateemissions.WethenusedthereductionsinfuelconsumptionpredictedbyREMI(Breslowetal2014,NystromandZaidi2013a)toestimatereductionsinairpollutantemissionsfromthecarbonfee.Toestimatereductionsinprematuremortality,weusehealthimpactfunctionsspecificforresidentialcombustionoffuelsinMassachusettsfrompreviousstudies(Levyetal2016,Pennetal2017).ThesehealthimpactfunctionswerebasedonanatmosphericmodeltypicallyusedbytheU.S.EPAtomodelthebenefitsofairpollutioncontrolstrategies(ByunandSchere2013),combinedwithpopulationdataandbackgroundmortalityrate(CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention2015)andevidencefrommeta-analysesorlargecohortstudiesonthehealthimpactsofairpollution(Romanetal2008,Driscolletal2015,Schwartzetal2008).Toestimatereductionsinhospitalizationsandheartattacks,weusetheresultsfromananalysisofcarbonemissionsstandardsforpowerplantsandderiveratiosofhospitalizationsandheartattacksavoidedperlifesavedforMassachusetts(Driscolletal2015,Zanobettietal2009,Levyetal2012a,Mustafić2012a).

ReductionsofFossilFuelUse:REMImodeloutput(Breslowetal2014,NystromandZaidi2013a)providedreductionsintheuseoffossilfuelsbyfueltypeandsector,comparedtoa“businessasusual”casewithouttherule(Figure1).From2017to2040,thegreatestreductioninfossilfuelusecomesfromreductioninmotorgasolineuse,followedbytheuseofnaturalgasforheating,useofdieselfortransportation,andtheuseofoilforheating.Forallsources,theamountofthereductiongrowsuntil2023,whenthecarbonfeereachesitspeakof$40/ton.Formotorgasoline,thereductionsduetothefeepeakin2025andthentaperoff.Fortheotheraffectedsources,thereductionspeakin2035.Thereductionsduetothecarbonfeetaperafterreachingapeakamountbecausethefeeisnottiedtoinflation.Thereductionsinfuelusereachtheirpeaksomeyearsafterthefeepeaksduetoatimelagbetweenthefeeandwhenpeoplerespondtoit.Transportationreachesitspeaksoonerthanbuildings,because

Page 8: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

8

thevehiclefleethasashorterturnovertimethanbuildingsandHVACequipment,sothissectorcanrespondtopricesignalssooner.

Figure1:Reductionsintheuseoffossilfuelsduetoacarbonfeestartingin2017,bysectorandfueltype,intermsoftotalenergycontentoffuel,until2040.

ReductionsinAirPollutantEmissions:OurmodelusesemissionsfactorsderivedfromtheU.S.EPANEIdataonemissionsofPM2.5,NOx,SO2,andVOCs(ourpollutantsofinterest)for2014(themostrecentyearwithavailabledata)(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2017)andthe2014“businessasusual”fuelusefromtheeconomicmodel.Weusethesevaluesofemissionsperunitoffuelconsumedbyfuelandsectortocalculatethe“businessasusual”emissions.WethencalculatetheemissionsreductionsofPM2.5,NOx,SO2,andVOCsasaresultofthefee,comparedto“businessasusual”,usingthechangesinfuelconsumption.Emissionsofairpollutantsdecreaseinproportiontothereductionsinfueluse(Figure2).ReductionsinNOxemissionsarehigherthanthoseofSO2andPM2.5sinceNOxisthedominantairpollutantforthesourcesandfueltypesaffectedbythecarbonfee.Reductionsduetothecarbonfeeincreasefromtheimplementationyearthrough2035,consistentwiththereductionsinfueluse.Theemissionsreductionsslowsomewhatin2023,whenthefeereachesitspeak,andtaperfurtherin2025,whenthereductionsintheuseofmotorgasolinedecrease.

Page 9: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

9

Figure2:Reductionsinkeyairpollutantsduetoacarbonfeeimplementedin2017,until2040.

HealthBenefitsoftheCarbonFee:Ourmodeluseshealthimpactpertonestimatesfrompeer-reviewedliteraturetoestimatethenumberoflivessavedduetotheemissionsreductions(Pennetal2017,Levyetal2016).Themodelthenusesratiosbetweenmortalityandotherhealthimpactsfrompreviousstudies(Driscolletal2015)toestimateotherhealthbenefitsofthecarbonfee.Toputamonetaryvalueonthehealthbenefits,thismodelusesastandardvaluationmethodologyusedbytheU.S.EPA,othergovernmentagencies,manyotherco-benefitsstudies,andotherresearch,calledthe“valueofstatisticallife”(VSL)(Buonocoreetal2015,2016b,Siler-Evansetal2013,Thompsonetal2014,2016,Dockinsetal2004,Levyetal2009).TheVSLputsavalueonhealthbenefitsusing“willingness-to-pay”,orthevalueapersoniswillingtopay,forareductionintheirriskofdeath(Dockinsetal2004,ViscusiandAldy2003).Ourmodelprovidesacentralestimate,alongwith95%confidenceintervals,tocharacterizeuncertaintyintheestimates(Table1).Theresultsdiscussedrefertothesecentralestimates,unlessotherwisestated.

Page 10: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

10

Ourmodelshowsthatcomparedtoa“businessasusual”scenario,thecumulativehealthbenefitsofthiscarbonfeefrom2017through2040willbe:

• 340livessaved• 26respiratoryhospitalizationsavoided• 28cardiovascularhospitalizationsavoided• 20heartattacksavoided• $2.9billion($2017USD)ofcumulativehealthbenefitsbetween2017and

2040,worth$2.0billion($2017USD)ifdiscountedto2017at3%peryear• Reductionsinotherhealthoutcomesthatwerenotquantifiedhere

Table1:EstimatedcumulativehealthbenefitsduetoacarbonfeeinMassachusetts,comparedtobusinessasusual.Centralestimatesaredisplayedalongwith95%confidenceintervals.Valuesareroundedtotwosignificantdigits.CumulativeHealthBenefitsbetween2017(implementationyear)and2040

Centralestimate(95%ConfidenceIntervals)

TotalLivesSaved 340(82-590)

RespiratoryHospitalizationsAvoided 26(14-39)CardiovascularHospitalizationsAvoided 28(19-36)

HeartAttacksAvoided 20(12-28)

Valueofhealthbenefits(billion$2017USD),undiscounted $2.9billion($0.71-$5.2billion)

Valueofhealthbenefits(billion$2017USD),discountedto2017valueat3%peryear $2.0billion($0.49-$3.5billion)Thehealthbenefitsofthecarbonfeevaryovertime,andinapatternthatisconsistentwiththeemissionsreductions(Figure3).Thehealthbenefitspeakintheyear2035,andrisemoreslowlybetween2023and2025,sincetheemissionsreductionsslowduringthisperiod.

Page 11: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

11

Figure3:Livessavedeachyearduetocarbonfee.Thevaluesdisplayedarethecentralestimateandthelowandhighboundsofthe95%confidenceinterval.ThelivessavedperyearbypollutantareshowninFigure4.MostofthepublichealthbenefitsarefromreductionsinNOx,VOCandPM2.5emissions,withasmallercontributionfromSO2reductions.ThehealthbenefitsofavoidedSO2arelowbecausecomparativelylittleSO2isemittedfromthefuelsaffectedbythecarbonfee.EventhoughmuchhigherNOxemissionsareavoidedthanPM2.5,thehealthbenefitsofavoidingtheseemissionsarefairlysimilar,becauseonaper-ton-emittedbasis,PM2.5hasamuchhigherimpactthanNOxdoes.NOxandVOCsbothcontributetohealthimpactestimatesthroughformationofPM2.5andO3intheatmosphere,buttheseformationprocessestakesometimeandoccurmostreadilyonlyundercertainconditionsrelatedtoseason,weather,andemissionsofotherbackgroundsources.EmissionsofPM2.5donotneedtogothroughanychemicaltransformation,andcanhavehigherimpactsclosertothesourceofemissions.

Page 12: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

12

Figure4:Livessavedperyearbyavoidedemissionstype.Livessavedduetothecarbonfee,brokendownbysectorandfueltype,areshowninFigure5.Thehealthbenefitsarelargelydrivenbyreductionsinthetransportationsector,followedbycommercial,industrial,andthenresidentialbuildings.Thisisconsistentwiththereductionsinfueluse,andalsotheemissionsprofileofeachfuelandsourcetype.

Page 13: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

13

Figure5:Annuallivessavedperyear,bysourcesectorandfueltype.

ValueofHealthBenefitsOurmodelcalculatestheeconomicvalueofthehealthbenefitsofthecarbonfeeusingthevalueofstatisticallife(VSL),astandardmethodologyfromtheU.S.EPA(Dockinsetal2004)appliedtoeachprematuredeath(Figure6).Wedonotcalculatethemonetarybenefitsforotherhealthoutcomes,butpriorresearchshowsthatVSLcapturesmostofthebenefitsofairpollutionreductions(Buonocoreetal2016a,Fannetal2009).Theestimatedcumulativehealthco-benefitsofthecarbonfeeareapproximately$2.9billion.Thetrendovertimeinundiscountedvalueofhealthbenefitsisslightlydifferentfromthetrendinlivessavedovertime(Figure7).ThisisduetoatimelagbetweenPM2.5exposureandmortality,sincetheestimatesarebasedonlong-termexposurestudiesthatfoundatimelag.Thisisnotthecaseforozoneexposureandmortality,sincetheestimatesarebasedonshort-termexposurestudies.

Page 14: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

14

Figure6:Annualmonetizedhealthbenefitsofacarbonfee,from2017to2040.Valuesshownarethecentralestimate,andlowerandupperboundsofthe95%confidenceinterval.Resultsshownareundiscounted.

Figure7:Annuallivessavedduetoacarbonfee,byreductionsinexposuretoozoneandtoPM2.5.

Page 15: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

15

SummaryandConclusionHere,webuildamodeldesignedtocalculatethehealthco-benefitsofacarbonfeeinMassachusetts.ThismodelusedoutputfromaeconomicanalysisbyREMI(NystromandZaidi2013a,Breslowetal2014),estimatedemissionsofotherairpollutantsusingdatafromtheU.S.EPANEI(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2017),andusedaseriesofexistingmethodstoestimatetheco-benefitsfromthecarbonfeeandputtheminmonetaryterms(Levyetal2016,Pennetal2017,Dockinsetal2004,U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)2015,Driscolletal2015).Wefoundthatthecumulativehealthco-benefitsofaproposedcarbonfeeinMassachusettsfrom2017through2040areasfollows:

• 340livessaved• 26respiratoryhospitalizationsavoided• 28cardiovascularhospitalizationsavoided• 20heartattacksavoided• $2.9billion($2017USD)ofcumulativehealthbenefitsbetween2017and

2040,worth$2.0billion($2017USD)ifdiscountedto2017at3%peryearInadditiontothesebenefits,additionalhealthbenefitsfromreductionsinairpollutionwerenotquantifiedhere,suchasasthmaattacks(Jacqueminetal2015,Braueretal2002,Andersonetal2013),lostdaysofschoolandwork(LeiChen,BrianL.Jennison,WeiYa2000,Gillilandetal2001),prematurebirthandlowbirthweight(Kloogetal2012,Darrowetal2011,Lietal2016),autismspectrumdisorder(Talbottetal2015)andAlzheimer’sdisease(Jungetal2015,Cacciottoloetal2016),alongwithbenefitstocropproductivity,farming,forestry,andreductionsinacidrain(CommitteeonHealth,Environmental2010,ChestnutandMills2005,Wittigetal2007,JosephE.Aldyetal1999).Thehealthco-benefitsofthecarbonfeeincreasealongwithincreasesintheproposedcarbonfeeandpeakin2035.Thereisalagbetweenfeeincreaseandhealthco-benefitsduetothetimerequiredforturnoverinthevehicleandbuildingHVACfleet.Additionally,healthco-benefitspeakin2035sincethefeeisnottiedtoinflation.Thesefindingsindicatearelationshipbetweenthecarbonfeeamountandthemagnitudeofhealthco-benefits–astheamountofthefeeincreases,sotoodothehealthco-benefits.Thehealthbenefitsofthecarbonfeewouldlargelybedrivenbyreductionsinemissionsfromtransportationandfrombuildings,andpeoplenearerthesesourceswouldexperiencemuchofthehealthbenefits.Thehealthdamagefunctionmodelusedinthisstudyexaminedthestateasawhole,using2005populationandunderlyingdiseaserates,anditwasbeyondthescopeofthisstudytoevaluatethegeographicaldistributionofthesebenefits.

Page 16: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

16

InMassachusetts,transportationfossilfueluseisthelargestsourceofGHGemissions,followedbyfossilfueluseinbuildings(MassachusettsExecutiveOfficeofEnergyandEnvironmentalAffairs2017b).Thesesourcesarealsomajorsourcesofotherairpollutants,whichhaveasubstantialburdenonpublichealth(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2017,Fannetal2012a,2013).Theproposedbills,MassachusettsS.1821(Barrett2017)andMassachusettsH.1726(Benson2017),arebothexpectedtoreduceGHGemissionsinthestateandmakesubstantialprogresstowardsMassachusetts’goalsundertheGlobalWarmingSolutionsAct(MassachusettsExecutiveOfficeofEnergyandEnvironmentalAffairs2017a).TheresultsofthisstudyunderscorethatacarbonfeewillalsosubstantiallylessenhealthburdensofairpollutionwithinMassachusettsandthroughouttheregion.Healthco-benefitsfromairqualityimprovementsbeginshortlyafteremissionsreductions,increasewithfeeincreases,andoccurroughlywhereemissionsreductionsoccur,whichcanmakethemhighlyrelevantfordecision-making(Driscolletal2015,Buonocoreetal2015,2016b,Siler-Evansetal2013,Westetal2013,Nemetetal2010,Bainetal2015,Petrovicetal2014).Healthco-benefitscanbeacriticalfactorindecisionsaroundclimatemitigation(Petrovicetal2014,Bainetal2015),havebeenanimportantconsiderationfornational-levelclimatepolicy(Buonocoreetal2016a,Driscolletal2015),renewableenergydevelopment(Siler-Evansetal2013,Buonocoreetal2015,2016b,Plachinskietal2014)andcouldbeanimportantconsiderationindebatesaroundacarbonfeeinMassachusetts,andinothereffortstomitigateclimatechange.

AcknowledgementsWewouldliketothanktheMerckFamilyFund,theCleanWaterFund,Ms.LouiseHara&Mr.WayneH.Davis,Mrs.SusannaB.PlaceandMr.ScottL.Stoll,TaraGrecoandTheDanteR.GrecoTrust,Ms.CynthiaMargaretIris&Mr.RichardMcFadyen,Mr.NageshMahanthappa,Mr.JohnM.Dacey,Dr.JamesRecht&NinaDillon,ZaurieZimmer&CraigLeClair,Dr.RichardClapp,Dr.SusanJ.Ringler,andMs.BonniJ.Widdoesfortheirsupportforthisstudy.WewouldalsoliketothankEricGrunebaum,RebeccaMorris,andMarcBreslowfortheirdiscussionandcommentsonearlydraftsofthiswork.

ReferencesAiyyerA,CohanD,RussellA,StockwellW,TanrikuluS,VizueteWandWilczakJ

2007FinalReport:ThirdPeerReviewoftheCMAQModelAndersonHR,FavaratoGandAtkinsonRW2013Long-termexposuretoair

pollutionandtheincidenceofasthma:Meta-analysisofcohortstudiesAirQual.Atmos.Heal.647–56

BainPG,MilfontTL,KashimaY,BilewiczM,DoronG,GarðarsdóttirRB,GouveiaV

Page 17: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

17

V,GuanY,JohanssonL-O,PasqualiC,Corral-VerdugoV,AragonesJI,UtsugiA,DemarqueC,OttoS,ParkJ,SolandM,StegL,GonzálezR,LebedevaN,MadsenOJ,WagnerC,AkotiaCS,KurzT,SaizJL,SchultzPW,EinarsdóttirGandSaviolidisNM2015Co-benefitsofaddressingclimatechangecanmotivateactionaroundtheworldNat.Clim.Chang.Online:http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate2814

BarrettMJ2017AnActCombatingClimateChange(The190thGeneralCourtoftheCommonwealthofMassachusetts)Online:https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/SD1021/District

BensonJE2017AnActtoPromoteGreenInfrastructure,ReduceGreenhouseGasEmissions,andCreateJobs(The190thGeneralCourtoftheCommonwealthofMassachusetts)Online:https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/H1726

BrauerM,HoekG,VanVlietP,MeliefsteK,FischerPH,WijgaA,KoopmanLP,NeijensHJ,GerritsenJ,KerkhofM,HeinrichJ,BellanderTandBrunekreefB2002AirpollutionfromtrafficandthedevelopmentofrespiratoryinfectionsandasthmaticandallergicsymptomsinchildrenAm.J.Respir.Crit.CareMed.1661092–8

BreslowM,HamelS,LuckowPandNystromS2014AnalysisofaCarbonFeeorTaxasaMechanismtoReduceGHGEmissionsinMassachusettsDepartmentofEnergyResources1–156Online:http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/doer/fuels/mass-carbon-tax-study.pdf

BuonocoreJJ,DongX,SpenglerJD,FuJSandLevyJI2014UsingtheCommunityMultiscaleAirQuality(CMAQ)modeltoestimatepublichealthimpactsofPM2.5fromindividualpowerplantsEnviron.Int.68200–8Online:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0160412014001111

BuonocoreJJ,LambertKF,BurtrawD,SekarSandDriscollCT2016aAnAnalysisofCostsandHealthCo-BenefitsforaU.S.PowerPlantCarbonStandardedDNewthPLoSOne11e0156308Online:http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156308

BuonocoreJJ,LuckowP,FisherJ,KemptonWandLevyJI2016bHealthandclimatebenefitsofoffshorewindfacilitiesintheMid-AtlanticUnitedStatesEnviron.Res.Lett.1174019Online:http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074019

BuonocoreJJ,LuckowP,NorrisG,SpenglerJD,BiewaldB,FisherJandLevyJI2015Healthandclimatebenefitsofdifferentenergy-efficiencyandrenewableenergychoicesNat.Clim.Chang.6100–5Online:http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate2771

ByunDandSchereKL2013ReviewoftheGoverningEquations,ComputationalAlgorithms,andOtherComponentsoftheModels-3CommunityMultiscaleAirQuality(CMAQ)ModelingSystemJ.Chem.Inf.Model.53

CacciottoloM,WangX,DriscollI,WoodwardN,SaffariA,ReyesJ,SerreM,VizueteW,SioutasC,MorganT,GatzM,ChuiH,ShumakerS,ResnickS,EspelandMAandFinchC2016Particulateairpollutants,APOEalleles,andtheircontributionstocognitiveimpairmentinolderwomenandtoamyloidogenesisinexperimentalmodelsTransl.Psychiatrysubmittede1022-8Online:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.280

Page 18: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

18

CentersforDiseaseControlandPreventionCDCWonderOnline:https://wonder.cdc.gov

ChestnutLGandMillsDM2005AfreshlookatthebenefitsandcostsoftheUSacidrainprogramJ.Environ.Manage.77252–66Online:papers2://publication/uuid/B538B1B9-6A11-4E0B-9A83-C79BFE7D87C0

CommitteeonHealth,EnvironmentalandOECandBofEPandCNRC2010HiddenCostsofEnergy:UnpricedConsequencesofEnergyProductionandUseOnline:http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=986424

CuevasSandHainesA2016HealthbenefitsofacarbontaxLancet3877–9DarrowLA,KleinM,StricklandMJ,MulhollandJAandTolbertPE2011Ambient

airpollutionandbirthweightinfull-terminfantsinAtlanta,1994-2004Environ.HealthPerspect.119731–7

DockinsC,MaguireK,SimonNandSullivanM2004Valueofstatisticallifeanalysisandenvironmentalpolicy:awhitepaperUSEnviron.Prot.AgencyNatl.Cent.Environ.Econ.Online:https://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwan/ee-0483-01.pdf/$file/ee-0483-01.pdf

DriscollCT,BuonocoreJJ,LevyJI,LambertKF,BurtrawD,ReidSB,FakhraeiHandSchwartzJ2015USpowerplantcarbonstandardsandcleanairandhealthco-benefitsNat.Clim.Chang.5535–40Online:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2598

FannN,BakerKRandFulcherCM2012aCharacterizingthePM2.5-relatedhealthbenefitsofemissionreductionsfor17industrial,areaandmobileemissionsectorsacrosstheU.S.Environ.Int.49141–51Online:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.08.017

FannN,FulcherCMandBakerK2013TheRecentandFutureHealthBurdenofAirPollutionApportionedAcrossU.S.SectorsEnviron.Sci.Technol.473580–9Online:http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es304831q

FannN,FulcherCMandHubbellBJ2009Theinfluenceoflocation,source,andemissiontypeinestimatesofthehumanhealthbenefitsofreducingatonofairpollution.AirQual.Atmos.Health2169–76Online:http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=19890404&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks

FannN,LamsonAD,AnenbergSC,WessonK,RisleyDandHubbellBJ2012bEstimatingthenationalpublichealthburdenassociatedwithexposuretoambientPM2.5andozone.RiskAnal.3281–95Online:http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01630.x

FoleyKM,RoselleSJ,AppelKW,BhavePV.,PleimJE,OtteTL,MathurR,SarwarG,YoungJO,GilliamRC,NolteCG,KellyJT,Gillilanda.BandBashJO2010IncrementaltestingoftheCommunityMultiscaleAirQuality(CMAQ)modelingsystemversion4.7Geosci.ModelDev.3205–26

Garcia-MenendezF,SaariRK,MonierEandSelinNE2015U.S.airqualityandhealthbenefitsfromavoidedclimatechangeundergreenhousegasmitigationEnviron.Sci.Technol.150608163837000Online:http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b01324

GillilandFD,BerhaneK,RappaportEB,ThomasDC,AvolE,GaudermannWJ,

Page 19: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

19

LondonS,MargolisS,McConnellRandIslamK2001TheeffectsofambientairpollutiononschoolabsenteeismduetorespiratoryillnessesEpidemiology1243–54

ItahashiS,UnoIandKimS2012SourcecontributionsofsulfateaerosoloverEastAsiaestimatedbyCMAQ-DDM.Environ.Sci.Technol.466733–41Online:http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=22642816&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks

JacqueminB,SirouxV,SanchezM,CarsinAE,SchikowskiT,AdamM,BellisarioV,BuschkaA,BonoR,BrunekreefB,CaiY,CirachM,Clavel-ChapelonF,DeclercqC,deMarcoR,DeNazelleA,Ducret-StichRE,FerrettiVV,GerbaseMW,HardyR,HeinrichJ,JansonC,JarvisD,AlKanaaniZ,KeidelD,KuhD,LeMoualN,NieuwenhuijsenMJ,MarconA,ModigL,PinI,RochatT,SchindlerC,SugiriD,StempfeletM,TemamS,TsaiMY,VarrasoR,VienneauD,VierkötterA,HansellAL,KrämerU,Probst-HenschNM,SunyerJ,KünzliNandKauffmannF2015Ambientairpollutionandadultasthmaincidenceinsixeuropeancohorts(Escape)Environ.HealthPerspect.123613–21

JosephE.Aldy,KramerRAandHolmesTP1999EnvironmentalEquityandtheConservationofUniqueEcosystems:AnAnalysisoftheDistributionofBenefitsforProtectingSouthernAppalachianSpruce-FirForestsSoc.Nat.Resour.1293–106

JungC-R,LinY-TandHwangB-F2015Ozone,particulatematter,andnewlydiagnosedAlzheimer’sdisease:apopulation-basedcohortstudyinTaiwan.J.Alzheimers.Dis.44573–84Online:http://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad140855

KennedyK,ObeiterM,KaufmanNandHandbookCA2015WorkingPaperPuttingaPriceonCarbon :aHandbookforU.S.Policymakers1–56

KloogI,MellySJ,RidgwayWL,CoullBAandSchwartzJ2012UsingnewsatellitebasedexposuremethodstostudytheassociationbetweenpregnancyPM₂.₅exposure,prematurebirthandbirthweightinMassachusetts.Environ.Health1140Online:http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=22709681&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks

KrewskiD,JerrettM,BurnettRT,MaR,HughesE,ShiY,TurnerMC,PopeCA,ThurstonG,CalleEE,ThunMJ,BeckermanB,DeLucaP,FinkelsteinN,ItoK,MooreDK,NewboldKB,RamsayT,RossZ,ShinHandTempalskiB2009Extendedfollow-upandspatialanalysisoftheAmericanCancerSocietystudylinkingparticulateairpollutionandmortality.Res.Rep.Health.Eff.Inst.5-114-136

LeiChen,BrianL.Jennison,WeiYa2000ElementarySchoolAbsenteeismandAirPollutionInhal.Toxicol.12997–1016Online:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08958370050164626

LepeuleJ,LadenF,DockeryDandSchwartzJ2012Chronicexposuretofineparticlesandmortality:Anextendedfollow-upoftheHarvardsixcitiesstudyfrom1974to2009Environ.HealthPerspect.120965–70

LevyJI,BaxterLKandSchwartzJ2009UncertaintyandVariabilityinHealth-

Page 20: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

20

RelatedDamagesfromCoal-FiredPowerPlantsintheUnitedStatesRiskAnal.291000–14Online:papers2://publication/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01227.x

LevyJI,DiezD,DouY,BarrCDandDominiciF2012aAmeta-analysisandmultisitetime-seriesanalysisofthedifferentialtoxicityofmajorfineparticulatematterconstituentsAm.J.Epidemiol.1751091–9

LevyJI,WooMK,PennSL,OmaryM,TambouretY,KimCSandArunachalamS2016Carbonreductionsandhealthco-benefitsfromUSresidentialenergyefficiencymeasuresEnviron.Res.Lett.1134017Online:http://stacks.iop.org/1748-9326/11/i=3/a=034017?key=crossref.b1172ec2bc981f953be8b1bc85431467

LevyJI,WoodyM,BaekBH,ShankarUandArunachalamS2012bCurrentandfutureparticulate-matter-relatedmortalityrisksintheUnitedStatesfromaviationemissionsduringlandingandtakeoff.RiskAnal.32237–49Online:http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=21801192&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks

LiL,LaurentOandWuJ2016Spatialvariabilityoftheeffectofairpollutionontermbirthweight:evaluatinginfluentialfactorsusingBayesianhierarchicalmodelsEnviron.Heal.1514Online:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26850268%5Cnhttp://www.ehjournal.net/content/15/1/14

LiuJHandRenfroJ2013CoverphotographCarbonTaxandShift:HowtoMakeitWorkforOregon’sEconomyOnline:https://www.pdx.edu/nerc/sites/www.pdx.edu.nerc/files/carbontax2013.pdf

MadriganoJ,KloogI,GoldbergR,CoullBA,MittlemanMAandSchwartzJ2013Long-termexposuretoPM2.5andincidenceofacutemyocardialinfarction.Environ.HealthPerspect.121192–6Online:http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=23204289&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks

MassachusettsExecutiveOfficeofEnergyandEnvironmentalAffairs2017aGlobalWarmingSolutionsActBackgroundOnline:http://www.mass.gov/eea/air-water-climate-change/climate-change/massachusetts-global-warming-solutions-act/global-warming-solutions-act-background.html

MassachusettsExecutiveOfficeofEnergyandEnvironmentalAffairs2017bMAGHGEmissionsTrendsOnline:http://www.mass.gov/eea/air-water-climate-change/climate-change/massachusetts-global-warming-solutions-act/ma-ghg-emission-trends/

MoriK2011WashingtonStateCarbonTaxOnline:http://www.sightline.org/research_item/washington-state-carbon-tax/

MustafićH2012aMainAirPollutantsandMyocardialInfarction:ASystematicReviewandMeta-analysisJAMAJ.Am.Med.Assoc.307713Online:http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/307/7/713.short

MustafićH2012bMainAirPollutantsandMyocardialInfarction<subtitle>ASystematicReviewandMeta-analysis</subtitle>JAMAJ.Am.Med.Assoc.307713Online:http://jama.jamanetwork.com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/article.aspx?articleid=1104975

Page 21: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

21

NemetGF,HollowayTandMeierP2010Implicationsofincorporatingair-qualityco-benefitsintoclimatechangepolicymakingEnviron.Res.Lett.514007Online:papers2://publication/doi/10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014007

NystromS2015aTheEconomic,Demographic,Fiscal,andEmissionsImplicationsofaCarbonFeeinArkansasOnline:https://www.adeq.state.ar.us/air/planning/cpp/pdfs/economic_demographic_fiscal_emissions_implications_of_carbon_fee.pdf

NystromS2015bTheEconomic,Fiscal,Emissions,andDemographicImpactofaPriceonCarbonDioxideinRhodeIslandvol20006Online:http://www.energizeri.org/uploads/5/4/5/8/54586171/the_economic_fiscal_emissions_and_demographic_impact_of_a_price_on_carbon_in_ri.pdf

NystromSandSuiteKSNW2014TheEconomic,Fiscal,Emissions,andDemographicImplicationsfromaCarbonPricePolicyinVermontOnline:http://www.energyindependentvt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/REMI_Final.pdf

NystromSandZaidiA2013aModelingtheEconomic,Demographic,andClimateImpactofaCarbonTaxinMassachusetts

NystromSandZaidiA2013bTheEconomic,Demographic,andClimateImpactofEnvironmentalTaxReforminWashingtonandKingCountyvol20006Online:http://www.cbuilding.org/sites/default/files/etr-wa-remi-dec-13-2013.pdf

PennSL,ArunachalamS,WoodyM,Heiger-bernaysW,TripodisYandLevyJI2017Estimatingstate-specificcontributionstoPM2.5-andO3-relatedhealthburdenfromresidentialcombustionandelectricitygeneratingunitemissionsintheUnitedStatesEnviron.HealthPerspect.125324–32

PetrovicN,MadriganoJandZavalL2014Motivatingmitigation:whenhealthmattersmorethanclimatechangeClim.Change245–54

PlachinskiSD,HollowayT,MeierPJ,NemetGF,RrushajA,ObermanJT,DuranPLandVoigtCL2014Quantifyingtheemissionsandairqualityco-benefitsoflower-carbonelectricityproductionAtmos.Environ.94180–91Online:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.028

PopeIIICAandDockeryDW2006HealthEffectsofFineParticulateAirPollution :LinesthatConnectJ.AirWasteManage.Assoc.56709–42

RomanHa.,WalkerKD,WalshTL,ConnerL,RichmondHM,HubbellBJandKinneyPL2008ExpertjudgmentassessmentofthemortalityimpactofchangesinambientfineparticulatematterintheU.S.Environ.Sci.Technol.422268–74

RoyB,MathurR,GillilandABandHowardSC2007AcomparisonofCMAQ-basedaerosolpropertieswithIMPROVE,MODIS,andAERONETdataJ.Geophys.Res.112D14301Online:http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2006JD008085.shtml

SaariRK,SelinNE,RauschSandThompsonTM2015Aself-consistentmethodtoassessairqualityco-benefitsfromU.S.climatepoliciesJ.AirWasteManage.Assoc.6574–89

SaariRK,ThompsonTMandSelinNE2017HumanHealthandEconomicImpactsofOzoneReductionsbyIncomeGroupEnviron.Sci.Technol.acs.est.6b04708Online:http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.6b04708

Page 22: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

22

SchwartzJ,CoullB,LadenFandRyanL2008TheeffectofdoseandtimingofdoseontheassociationbetweenairborneparticlesandsurvivalEnviron.HealthPerspect.11664Online:papers2://publication/uuid/358921ED-BDF1-4DC1-8F46-8634B24E73E5

ShinHH,FannN,BurnettRT,CohenAandHubbellBJ2014OutdoorFineParticlesandNonfatalStrokesSystematicReviewandMeta-analysisEpidemiology835–42

Siler-evansK,LimaI,MorganMGandAptJ2013Regionalvariationsinthehealth,environmental,andclimatebenefitsofwindandsolargenerationPNAS11011768–11773

TalbottEO,ArenaVC,RagerJR,CloughertyJE,MichanowiczDR,SharmaRKandStacySL2015FineparticulatematterandtheriskofautismspectrumdisorderEnviron.Res.140414–20Online:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0013935115001449

ThompsonTM,RauschS,SaariRKandSelinNE2014Asystemsapproachtoevaluatingtheairqualityco-benefitsofUScarbonpoliciesNat.Clim.Chang.4

ThompsonTM,RauschS,SaariRKandSelinNE2016AirQualityCo-BenefitsofSub-NationalCarbonPoliciesJ.AirWasteManage.Assoc.2247null-nullOnline:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1192071

ThompsonTM,RauschSandSelinNE2012EvaluatingEnergyPolicy:QuantifyingAirPollutionandHealthCo-Benefits101Online:papers2://publication/uuid/3D26737B-3452-473B-A27A-C45263C0C61B

U.S.CensusBureauU.S.CensusOnline:https://www.census.govU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency20172014NationalEmissionsInventory

(NEI)DataOnline:https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2014-national-emissions-inventory-nei-data

U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2015CarbonPollutionEmissionGuidelinesforExistingStationarySources:ElectricUtilityGeneratingUnits(UnitedStatesofAmerica)Online:http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/cpp-final-rule.pdf

U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)2015TechnicalSupportDocument:SocialCostofCarbonforRegulatoryImpactAnalysisUnderExecutiveOrder128661–21Online:http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regulations/scc-tsd.pdf

U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsHealthandEnvironmentalImpactsDivision2011RegulatoryImpactAnalysisfortheFinalMercuryandAirToxicsStandardsvolEPA-452/R-Online:c:%5Cgwhite%5CHgBiblio%5Cattachments%5CUSEPARegImpactAnalysisfortheMercuryandAirToxicsStandards2011_12_21.pdf

ViscusiWandAldyJ2003TheValueofaStatisticalLife:ACriticalReviewofMarketEstimatesThroughouttheWorldJ.RiskUncertain.Online:http://www.springerlink.com/index/HVX240T1J16VW60W.pdf

WashingtonStateDepartmentofCommerceCarbonTaxAssessmentModel(CTAM)Online:http://www.commerce.wa.gov/growing-the-economy/energy/washington-state-energy-office/carbon-tax/

WattsN,AdgerWN,AgnolucciP,BlackstockJ,ByassP,CaiW,ChaytorS,ColbournT,CollinsM,CooperA,CoxPM,DepledgeJ,DrummondP,EkinsP,GalazV,Grace

Page 23: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

23

D,GrahamH,GrubbM,HainesA,HamiltonI,HunterA,JiangX,LiM,KelmanI,LiangL,LottM,LoweR,LuoY,MaceG,MaslinM,NilssonM,OreszczynT,PyeS,QuinnT,SvensdotterM,VenevskyS,WarnerK,XuB,YangJ,YinY,YuC,ZhangQ,GongP,MontgomeryHandCostelloA2015Healthandclimatechange:policyresponsestoprotectpublichealthLancet3861861–914Online:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673615608546

WestJJ,SmithSJ,SilvaRA,NaikV,ZhangY,AdelmanZ,FryMM,AnenbergS,HorowitzLWandLamarqueJ-F2013Co-benefitsofmitigatingglobalgreenhousegasemissionsforfutureairqualityandhumanhealthNat.Clim.Chang.Online:http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate2009

WittigVE,AinsworthEa.andLongSP2007Towhatextentdocurrentandprojectedincreasesinsurfaceozoneaffectphotosynthesisandstomatalconductanceoftrees?Ameta-analyticreviewofthelast3decadesofexperimentsPlant,CellEnviron.301150–62

ZanobettiA,FranklinM,KoutrakisPandSchwartzJ2009Fineparticulateairpollutionanditscomponentsinassociationwithcause-specificemergencyadmissionsEnviron.Health858Online:http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/58

Page 24: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

24

Methodology:Tocalculatethehealthco-benefitsofthispolicy,wedevelopedamethodologythatlinkedaseriesofmodels:

• WestartedwithoutputfromaREMIanalysisusingtheeconomicmodelCTAM(CarbonTaxAssessmentModel)(WashingtonStateDepartmentofCommerce),calibratedforMassachusetts(Breslowetal2014,NystromandZaidi2013a).ThismodelprovidedthereductionsinCO2emissionsandfuelconsumptionforrelevanteconomicsectorsinMassachusetts.

• WelinkedthistotheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyNationalEmissionsInventorydataforMassachusetts(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2017)todeterminetheemissionsofSO2,NOx,PM2.5,andVOCsin2014fromtherelevantsectorsandthencalculatetheexpectedreductionsintheseemissionsduetothepolicy.

• WeestimatedthenumberoflivessavedfromthispolicyusingmortalitypertonemittedfunctionsforSO2,NOx,PM2.5,andVOCs,developedspecifictoMassachusetts(Levyetal2016,Pennetal2017).

• Wethenestimatedthereductionsinhospitalizationsandheartattacksusingtheratiobetweenthereductioninthesehealthoutcomesandlivessaved,specifictoMassachusetts(Buonocoreetal2016a,Driscolletal2015).

ThedetailsoftheREMIanalysisareavailableelsewhere(NystromandZaidi2013a,Breslowetal2014),butbriefly,thisanalysisreliesonCTAM(CarbonTaxAssessmentModel),whichisaeconomicmodelthatusesdatafromtheU.S.EnergyInformationAdministration(EIA)andpriceelasticitiesforfuels(howfuelconsumptionchangeswithachangeinfuelprice).InadditiontoMassachusetts,thismodelhasbeenusedtosimulatetheeffectofcarbonemissionspoliciesinArkansas,RhodeIsland,Vermont,Oregon,andWashington(NystromandZaidi2013a,Nystrom2015a,2015b,NystromandSuite2014,LiuandRenfro2013,NystromandZaidi2013b,Mori2011).ForecastsfromtheNationalEnergyModelingSystem(NEMS)runbytheEIAprovideforecastsoffuturefueluse.Thecarbonemissionsfromeachfuelsourcearecalculatedusingstandardemissionsfactorsforfuels,basedonEIAconsumptiondataandforecastsfromNEMS.Thecarbonemissionfeefromthepolicyisthenappliedtothesecarbonemissionstocalculatetheexpectedcostofemissions.Thepriceelasticitiesarethenusedtocalculatetheexpectedreductionsinconsumptionofeachfuel,andtheconsequentreductionincarbonemissions.ThemodelwascalibratedforconditionsspecifictoMassachusetts,includingGDPgrowth,numberofhouseholds,andexistingpolicies.Themodeloutputusedhereestimatesthecarbonemissionsundera“businessasusual”baselinewithoutacarbonfeeforindividualfuelcategoriesusedintheresidential,commercial,andindustrialbuildingsector,andtransportationsector.Usingtheestimatedcarbonemissions,andthepolicypricetrajectory,themodelthencalculatesthesector-wideresponsetothispolicyintermsofreduceduseofeachfueltype,theresultingreductionincarbonemissions,andtheresulting

Page 25: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

25

reductionintheuseofthesefossilfuels.Asthismodelisbuiltfromaseriesofpriceelasticities,effectslikefuelswitching,technologicalchange,andchangesinfutureregulationsarenotexplicitlycapturedinthemodel,exceptasreflectedintheunderlyingNEMSforecasts.CTAMonlyprovidesthereductionsinfossilfueluseandcarbonemissions.TodeterminethereductionsinPM2.5,SO2,VOCs,andNOx,weusedthe“business-as-usual”fossilfuelconsumptionandtheemissionsfromtheU.S.EPANationalEmissionsInventoryfor2014todevelopemissionsfactorsforthesectorsinthismodel,providingemissionsperunitoffossilfuelused.Wethenusedtheseemissionsperunitoffossilfuelconsumedvaluestocalculateexpectedemissionsinfutureyears,underourbusiness-as-usualcase.Usingthebest-availableinformation,wematchedCTAMoutputtotheNEIasdescribedinTable2.Sinceouremissionsinventoryisbasedontheyear2014,changesintheemissionsprofileduetofueltypeswitches,changesinfuelquality,improvementsincontroltechnology,andchangesinairqualityregulationsarenotfullycapturedbythismodel.Table2:SectorandfueltypematchingbetweentheCarbonTaxAssessmentModelandtheU.S.EPANationalEmissionsInventoryCTAM NEIResidential ResidentialKerosene,DistillateFuelOil OilNaturalGas,LiquefiedPetroleumGases NaturalGasCommercial CommercialDistillateFuelOil,ResidualFuelOil,MotorGasoline

Oil

NaturalGas,LiquefiedPetroleumGases NaturalGasIndustrial IndustrialDistillateFuelOil,ResidualFuelOil,OtherPetroleum,MotorGasoline

Oil

NaturalGas,LiquefiedPetroleumGases NaturalGasTransportation TransportationMotorGasoline On-Roadnon-DieselHeavyDuty

Vehicles,On-Roadnon-DieselLightDutyVehicles,Non-RoadEquipment-Gasoline

DistillateFuelOil On-RoadDieselHeavyDutyVehicles,On-RoadDieselLightDutyVehicles,Locomotives,Non-RoadEquipment-Diesel

ResidualFuelOil CommercialMarineVesselsLiquefiedPetroleumGases,PipelineFuelNaturalGas,OtherPetroleum

Non-RoadEquipment-Other

Page 26: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

26

WiththecalculatedemissionsofPM2.5,SO2,VOCs,andNOx,wethenusedpreviouslydevelopedhealthdamagefunctions(incasesofmortalityper1,000tonsemitted)tocalculatethemortalityburdenoftheseemissionsunderbusinessasusual,through2040(Levyetal2016,Pennetal2017).ThehealthdamagefunctionsarebasedonemissionsfromresidentialcombustionoffuelssimulatedusingtheCommunityMultiscaleAirQualityModelDirectDecoupledMethod(CMAQ-DDM).CMAQisacomplexatmosphericchemistry,fate,andtransportmodelcommonlyusedbytheU.S.EPAandotherstosimulatetheairqualityimpactsofairpollutionpoliciesandindividualsources,andhasbeencalibratedusingobservationsfromground-basedmonitorsandsatellites(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsHealthandEnvironmentalImpactsDivision2011,U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2015,Buonocoreetal2014,Aiyyeretal2007,Royetal2007,Foleyetal2010).TheresultsusedhereweredevelopedusingCMAQ-DDM,whichallowsthecalculationofthesensitivityofpollutantconcentrationstoemissionsfromagivensourceorsetofsources(Levyetal2016,Pennetal2017,Itahashietal2012).Thesensitivitiesbetweenairpollutionemissionsandairqualitywerethenusedintandemwithconcentration-responsefunctionsanddatafromtheU.S.CensusandCentersforDiseaseControlandPreventiontocalculatethehealthimpactsofemissions(CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention,U.S.CensusBureau,Levyetal2016,Pennetal2016).Thehealthdamagefunctionswerebasedon2005dataforpopulationandunderlyinghealthstatus(Pennetal2017,Levyetal2016).Wedidnotadjustforchangingpopulationovertime,likelyunderestimatingfuturehealthbenefitsgivenpopulationgrowthandaging,butallowingustogenerateaconservativeestimateofbenefitsbaseddirectlyonpeer-reviewedestimates.Additionally,thesensitivitiesforemissionsfromresidentialcombustionwereusedtocalculateemissionsfromallbuildingsandfortransportation.Thisisareasonableproxysincemostbuildingsdonothaveextremelytallstacks,transportationemissionsgenerallyoccurneartheground,andemissionsfromresidentialcombustionandfromtransportationbothtendtoclusterinpopulationcenters.Tocalculatetheburdenofrespiratoryhospitalizations,cardiovascularhospitalizations,andheartattacksfromtheseemissions,weusedratiosbetweentheseeventsandthenumberofdeathsfromapreviousanalysisofthehealthbenefitsofcarbonemissionsstandardsin2020,andappliedtheseratiostoourmortalityestimates(Driscolletal2015).Thisratioisbasedonananalysisoftheelectricitysectorforadifferentyear,butsincetheairpollutantsarefairlyregionallydispersedandthesamepopulationsareexposed,itcanstillrepresentareasonableproxymethodtocalculatetheseotherhealthimpacts.Thismethodprovidesabaselinescenario,with“businessasusual”estimatesoffossilfuelsconsumed,carbonemissions,emissionsofSO2,NOx,VOCs,andPM2.5,andthehealthburdenintermsofmortalitycases,respiratoryhospitalizations,cardiovascularhospitalizations,andheartattacksduetofossilfuelconsumptioninMassachusettsfrom2017to2040.Wethenusedtheexpectedreductionsinfossil

Page 27: Air Quality and Health Co Benefits of a and Rebate Bill in … · 2019-03-19 · These two bills, directed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, may also provide substantial co-benefits

27

fuelusefromCTAMtocalculatetheexpectedreductionsintheotherairpollutantsthatwouldoccurunderthecarbonprice,alongwiththeexpectedhealthbenefits(NystromandZaidi2013a).Tocalculatemonetaryestimatesofthehealthbenefitsofthecarbonfee,weuseastandardmethodcalledthevalueofstatisticallife(VSL)(Dockinsetal2004).Thismetriciscommonlyusedinpolicyresearchandbyregulatoryagenciestoplaceavalueonreductionsintheriskofmortalityandgenerallycapturesmostofthevalueofhealthbenefits(Dockinsetal2004,U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsHealthandEnvironmentalImpactsDivision2011,U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2015,Thompsonetal2012,Saarietal2017,Garcia-Menendezetal2015,Saarietal2015,Buonocoreetal2016a,2016b,2015).Here,weusethestandard“cessationlag”structuretoaccountforthedelaybetweenexposuretoPM2.5andmortalityandadjustthevaluesforincomein2017(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsHealthandEnvironmentalImpactsDivision2011,U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2015).ThisresultsinaVSLof$8.5million(2017USD)formortalityfromPM2.5exposure,accountingforthecessationlagbetweenPM2.5exposureandmortality,andaVSLof$9.4million(2017USD)formortalityduetoozone,sincethereisnosubstantialdelaybetweenexposuretoozoneandmortalitygivenevidencederivedfromtime-seriesstudies(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsHealthandEnvironmentalImpactsDivision2011,U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2015).Wethencalculatethestreamoffuturehealthbenefitsinbothundiscountedanddiscountedterms,usinga3%discountrateperyear.