Upload
bebe
View
27
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS. Chapter 24 A.P.E.S. Is Dilution the Solution?. Years ago polluting factors were moved to more remote locations Used taller smokestacks to disperse pollution further up into air so it would dissipate over a wide area & come down in “harmless traces”. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS
Chapter 24A.P.E.S.
Is Dilution the Solution?• Years ago polluting
factors were moved to more remote locations
• Used taller smokestacks to disperse pollution further up into air so it would dissipate over a wide area & come down in “harmless traces”
PARTICULATE REMOVAL(2 types)
1. Filters – Cotton or fiberglass
cloth traps particles from effluent stream (waste gas), allowing clean air to pass thru.
– Similar to filter on car or vacuum- but bigger and more of them.
– Often stored in a “baghouse”
PARTICULATE REMOVAL2. Electrostatic precipitators
– Most common in powerplants
– Ash passes over electrodes & pick up an electrostatic surface charge
– Ash particles passed along & accumulate on a collecting plate that is removed and disposed of as solid waste in landfill
– 99% effective- depends on particle size, chemistry, strength of electric field
– Still poses solid waste problems
SULFUR REMOVAL(6 types)
1. Fuel Switching• Use low sulfur fuel from
softer coal• Will affect jobs in areas
that mine harder coals• Natural gas
• Difficult to ship, expensive
• Nuclear power• Uncertain dangers
• Alt. Energy source• Becoming more
competitive
SULFUR REMOVAL
2. Fuel Cleaning• Coal can be crushed,
washed, and gasified to remove sulfur
• Creates water pollution that must be cleaned- expensive
SULFUR REMOVAL3. Limestone Injection
• Mix limestone with coal before going to boiler
• CaCO3 reacts with sulfur to make CaSO3, CaSO4, or gypsum.
• Sometimes produces a residue called slag that reduces efficiency & must be disposed of
SULFUR REMOVAL4. Fluidized Bed Combustion
• 1 meter thick layer of coal & limestone cover perforated plate
• Air is forced up thru perforation to push coal & limestone up- making it seem like a fluid.
• Oil is sprayed into mix to “start the fire”
• Steam/water pipes are immersed in mix
• This makes burning more efficient & prevents build up of slag
• 90% of sulfur is captured by limestone & nitrogen cmpds are reduced due to lower temperatures used.
• Can use cheaper fuel (lignite)
SULFUR REMOVAL5. Flue Gas Scrubbing (wet
scrubbing)– Crushed limestone, lime
slurry, or alkali (sodium bicarbonate) are injected into gas stream
– Inexpensive & effective– Maintenance is difficult-
chip off plaster like residue regularly
– Causes metal erosion of pipes
– Dispose of solid waste
SULFUR REMOVAL
6. Dry alkali injection• Spray dry sodium
bicarbonate into gases
• Expensive• Trade off- reduce air
pollution problem but increase solid waste/water problem when wastes have to be disposed of.
NITROGEN OXIDE REMOVAL
• Staged burners– Burn at slower rate
reduces NOx• Catalytic converters
– Use platinum-palladium-rhodium to remove 90% of NOx, hydrocarbons, & CO from your cars exhaust
CLEAN AIR ACT• 1963- 1st national air
pollution legislation• Revamped in 1970’s
– Identified 6 criteria pollutants
– Est. national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
• Primary standards- protect human health
• Secondary standards- protect property, crops, climate, visibility, personal comfort
CLEAN AIR ACT• Extensively revamped in 1990
– Acid rain• Cut SO2 by more than ½ from
1990-2000– Urban smog
• ↓ tailpipe emissions, deadlines est. for cities that do not meet standards
– Toxic Air Pollutants• Factories must reduce toxic
pollutant production by 90% by 2003
– Ozone Protection• CFC’s & CCl4 phased out.
Recovery & recycling programs for CFCs est. Hydrofluorocarbons phased out by 2030
– Marketing pollution rights• Corporations can offset their
pollution levels by buying, selling, and banking pollution
– Volatile organic cmpds
CLEAN AIR ACT• And yes… Changed again in 1997• Ambient ozone standards lowered from 0.12 ppm(1 hr
avg) to 0.08 ppm (8 hr avg)• Soot & dust emissions apply to particles 2.5 microns vs.
10 previously• Cap and Trade program devised by President Bush is
designed to allow utilities not in compliance with EPA NAAQS to buy, sell, or trade pollution credits for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and particulates. The expense of these credits is a strong incentive to utilities to decrease their emissions to reduce their overall costs.
• A timeline of the Clean Air Act:• http://www.edf.org/documents/2695_cleanairact.htm
Clean Air Act http://www.epa.gov/air/oaq_caa.html
• Title I - Air Pollution Prevention and Control– Part A - Air Quality and Emission Limitations– Part B - Ozone Protection (replaced by Title VI)– Part C - Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality– Part D - Plan Requirements for Nonattainment Areas
• Title II - Emission Standards for Moving Sources– Part A - Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards– Part B - Aircraft Emission Standards– Part C - Clean Fuel Vehicles
• Title III - General• Title IV - Acid Deposition Control• Title V - Permits• Title VI - Stratospheric Ozone Protection
Be familiar with which part does what…
CAFÉ standards• Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 created
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) for vehicles.• Intended to reduce fuel consumption and emissions• Vehicles fuel efficiency 27.5mpg and trucks SUVS
20.7mpg (22.7mpg by 2007)• Reduce emissions NO to .07 g/mile• Reduce sulfur emissions from 300 ppm to 30 ppm• Effects: higher prices for vehicles, reduce pollutants by
2 millions tons /year.
CAFÉ Standards (updated 2011)http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/cafe/CAFE-
GHG_Fact_Sheet.pdf
TRUCKS CARS2009 23.1mpg 27.5mpg2010 23.5mpg 27.5mpg
2011 24.1mpg 30.2mpg2012 25.4mpg 33.3mpg2013 26.0mpg 34.2mpg
2014 26.6mpg 34.9mpg2015 27.5mpg 36.2mpg2016 28.8mpg 37.8mpg
Comparison of 1970 and 1999 Emissions
Other Countries…THE GOOD
• Sweden, W. Germany cut sulfur emissions by 2/3
• Austria & Switzerland over 2/3 & they control motorcycle emissions
• 26 of 37 cities on the Global Environmental Monitoring System have decreased particulate levels
• 20 out of 37 have decreased sulfur emissions
• Cubatao, Brazil was called “Valley of Death” due to dangerous pollution from oil refinery, chemical & fertilizer companies, steel plant; end of military rule allowed people to voice concern, invested money & reduced pollution significantly.
THE BAD & THE UGLY
• Many other countries do not have air pollution controls or legislation.
• China- almost entire pop. uses coal cakes to heat home; some places have particulate levels 9x those of max U.S. standards
• S. Poland, N. Czech Republic covered in smog most of the time, acid rain huge, gardens contaminated
• Copsa Mica, Romania- notorious “black town” from mining dust, birth defects, decreased life expectancy