2
This work is supported by grants from the FNRS (FRSM - Télévie), the J. Maisin Fundation, the Belgian Federation against Cancer and the Fortis Cancerology Research Fund. Reversal of temporal and spatial heterogeneities in tumor perfusion identifies the tumor vascular tone as a tunable parameter to improve drug delivery. Philippe Martinive 1 , Julie DeWever 1 , Caroline Bouzin 1 , Pierre Sonveaux 1 , Christine Baudelet 2 , Vincent Grégoire 3 , Bernard Gallez 2 , Olivier Feron 1 UCL Medical School, 1 Pharmacology & Therapeutics Unit (FATH 5349), 2 Biomedical Resonance Magnetic, 3 Center for Molecular Imaging and Experimental Radiotherapy, Ave E. Mounier 53, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium ([email protected]) 1.To characterize the effects of an ET-1 antagonist on the tumor vascular tone and blood flow heterogeneities. 2. To modulate the ET-1 pathway to improve tumor response to chemotherapy. AIMS INTRODUCTION 1.Tumor Blood flow heterogeneities impairs drug delivery and chemotherapy efficacy. 2.Pericytes covering endothelial tubes qive them the ability to react to substances present into the tumor. 3.Endothelin 1 known as a growth factor in oncology but also as a potent vasoconstrictor in cardiology. Laser Doppler Needle 50µm 50µm 50µm ET-A antag. Salin e Hoechst 33342 labeling (blue) and CD31-immunostained tumor vasculature (red) 0 0,005 0,01 0,015 0,02 0,025 0,03 0,035 0,04 0,045 0 10 20 30 40 50 [P792] (mM) 0 0,005 0,01 0,015 0,02 0,025 0,03 0,035 0,04 0,045 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) B efore After 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 * [P 7 9 2 ] (m M) B efore After 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 ns [P 7 9 2 ] (m M) Saline (I.P.) ET-A antag. (I.P. 1mg/kg) Before After 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 C yclophospham ide C yclophos.+ET-A antag. ET-A antag.(1m g/kg) Saline * Tim e (D ays) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 Tim e (D ays) Tum or D iam eter (% ) * Saline ET-A antag. -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 * C hanges in Tum or Voxels (% ) Before ET-A antag. After ET-A antag. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 200-250 m m 3 800-1000 m m 3 *** * IFP (m m Hg) « Wick-in-Needle » 25-nm fluorescent microspheres (red) and CD-31- immunostained tumor/muscle vasculature (green) Tum or Tum or Muscle Muscle Tum or Tum or ET-A antag. RESULTS Saline 2. ET-A antag. decreases blood flow heterogeneities 3. ET-A antag. improves « global» tumor perfusion (DCE-MRI) Saline ET-A antag. Co-opted tumor arteriole Isolated tumor and size-matched arterioles (myography) Tumor contrast agent concentration [P792] (mM) Tumor perfused voxels 4. ET-A antag. «qualitatively» improves tumor perfusion (DCE- MRI) CONCLUSIONS 5. ET-A antag. increases IFP 6. ET-A antag. improves the efficacy of conventional chemotherapy 1. Specific tumor vascular reactivity: Endothelin Receptor A antagonist V ascular smooth muscle cells E ndothelial cells ET A receptors Blood flow constriction ET-1 ET-A antag. Blood flow Chemotherapy, Cyclophos. I.P. (100mg/kg, d0 and d6; 25mg/kg, d0 and d1) co-injected with ET-A antag. 1.Endogenous ET-1 production largely participates in the tumor blood flow heterogeneitie 2.ET-A antag. may wipe out such heterogeneities and improves the delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs.

AIMS

  • Upload
    seamus

  • View
    21

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ET-A antag. Saline. Reversal of temporal and spatial heterogeneities in tumor perfusion identifies the tumor vascular tone as a tunable parameter to improve drug delivery. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: AIMS

This work is supported by grants from the FNRS (FRSM - Télévie), the J. Maisin Fundation, the Belgian Federation against Cancer and the Fortis Cancerology Research Fund.

Reversal of temporal and spatial heterogeneities in tumor perfusion identifies the tumor vascular tone as a tunable parameter to improve drug delivery.

Philippe Martinive1, Julie DeWever1, Caroline Bouzin1, Pierre Sonveaux1, Christine Baudelet2, Vincent Grégoire3, Bernard Gallez2, Olivier Feron1

UCL Medical School, 1Pharmacology & Therapeutics Unit (FATH 5349), 2Biomedical Resonance Magnetic, 3Center for Molecular Imaging and Experimental Radiotherapy, Ave E. Mounier 53, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium

([email protected])

1.To characterize the effects of an ET-1 antagonist on the tumor vascular tone and blood flow heterogeneities.2. To modulate the ET-1 pathway to improve tumor response to chemotherapy.

AIMS

INTRODUCTION

1.Tumor Blood flow heterogeneities impairs drug delivery and chemotherapy efficacy.2.Pericytes covering endothelial tubes qive them the ability to react to substances present into the tumor.3.Endothelin 1 known as a growth factor in oncology but also as a potent vasoconstrictor in cardiology.

Laser Doppler Needle

50µm50µm50µm

ET-A antag.Saline

Hoechst 33342 labeling (blue) and CD31-immunostained tumor vasculature (red)

0

0,005

0,01

0,015

0,02

0,025

0,03

0,035

0,04

0,045

0 10 20 30 40 50

[P7

92]

(mM

)

Time (min)

0

0,005

0,01

0,015

0,02

0,025

0,03

0,035

0,04

0,045

0 10 20 30 40 50

Time (min)

Before After0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.5 *

[P792]

(mM

)

Before After0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.5

ns

[P792]

(mM

)

Saline (I.P.)

ET-A antag. (I.P. 1mg/kg)

Before

After

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

Cyclophosphamide

Cyclophos.+ET-A antag.

ET-A antag. (1mg/kg)

Saline

*

Time (Days)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

Time (Days)

Tu

mo

r D

iam

eter

(%

)

*

Saline ET-A antag.

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25 *

Ch

ang

es i

n T

um

or

Vo

xels

(%

)

Before ET-A antag.

After ET-A antag.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

200-250 mm3

800-1000 mm3

***

*

IFP

(m

mH

g)

« Wick-in-Needle »25-nm fluorescent microspheres (red) and CD-31-immunostained tumor/muscle vasculature (green)

TumorTumor

Muscle Muscle

TumorTumor

ET-A antag.

RESULTS

Saline

2. ET-A antag. decreases blood flow heterogeneities

3. ET-A antag. improves « global» tumor perfusion (DCE-MRI)

Saline

ET-A antag.

Co-opted tumor arteriole

Isolated tumor and size-matched arterioles (myography)

Tumor contrast agent concentration

[P7

92]

(mM

)

Tumor perfused voxels

4. ET-A antag. «qualitatively» improves tumor perfusion (DCE-MRI)

CONCLUSIONS

5. ET-A antag. increases IFP 6. ET-A antag. improves the efficacy of conventional chemotherapy

1. Specific tumor vascular reactivity: Endothelin Receptor A antagonist

Vascular smooth muscle cells

Endothelial cells

ETA receptors

Blood flow

constriction

ET-1

ET-A antag.

Blood flow

Chemotherapy, Cyclophos. I.P. (100mg/kg, d0 and d6; 25mg/kg, d0 and d1) co-injected with ET-A antag.

1.Endogenous ET-1 production largely participates in the tumor blood flow heterogeneities.

2.ET-A antag. may wipe out such heterogeneities and improves the delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs.

Page 2: AIMS

This work is supported by grants from the FNRS (FRSM - Télévie), the J. Maisin Fundation, the Belgian Federation against Cancer and the Fortis Cancerology Research Fund.

Reversal of temporal and spatial heterogeneities in tumor perfusion identifies the tumor vascular tone as a tunable parameter to improve drug delivery.

Philippe Martinive1, Julie DeWever1, Caroline Bouzin1, Pierre Sonveaux1, Christine Baudelet2, Vincent Grégoire3, Bernard Gallez2, Olivier Feron1

UCL Medical School, 1Pharmacology & Therapeutics Unit (FATH 5349), 2Biomedical Resonance Magnetic, 3Center for Molecular Imaging and Experimental Radiotherapy, Ave E. Mounier 53, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium

([email protected])

1.To characterize the effects of an ET-1 antagonist on the tumor vascular tone and blood flow heterogeneities.2. To modulate the ET-1 pathway to improve tumor response to chemotherapy.

AIMS

INTRODUCTION

1.Tumor Blood flow heterogeneities impairs drug delivery and chemotherapy efficacy.2.Pericytes covering endothelial tubes qive them the ability to react to substances present into the tumor.3.Endothelin 1 known as a growth factor in oncology but also as a potent vasoconstrictor in cardiology.

Laser Doppler Needle

50µm50µm50µm

ET-A antag.Saline

Hoechst 33342 labeling (blue) and CD31-immunostained tumor vasculature (red)

0

0,005

0,01

0,015

0,02

0,025

0,03

0,035

0,04

0,045

0 10 20 30 40 50

[P7

92]

(mM

)

Time (min)

0

0,005

0,01

0,015

0,02

0,025

0,03

0,035

0,04

0,045

0 10 20 30 40 50

Time (min)

Before After0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.5 *

[P792]

(mM

)

Before After0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.5

ns

[P792]

(mM

)

Saline (I.P.)

ET-A antag. (I.P. 1mg/kg)

Before

After

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

Cyclophosphamide

Cyclophos.+ET-A antag.

ET-A antag. (1mg/kg)

Saline

*

Time (Days)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

Time (Days)

Tu

mo

r D

iam

eter

(%

)

*

Saline ET-A antag.

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25 *

Ch

ang

es i

n T

um

or

Vo

xels

(%

)

Before ET-A antag.

After ET-A antag.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

200-250 mm3

800-1000 mm3

***

*

IFP

(m

mH

g)

« Wick-in-Needle »25-nm fluorescent microspheres (red) and CD-31-immunostained tumor/muscle vasculature (green)

TumorTumor

Muscle Muscle

TumorTumor

ET-A antag.

RESULTS

Saline

2. ET-A antag. decreases blood flow heterogeneities

3. ET-A antag. improves « global» tumor perfusion (DCE-MRI)

Saline

ET-A antag.

Co-opted tumor arteriole

Isolated tumor and size-matched arterioles (myography)

Tumor contrast agent concentration

[P7

92]

(mM

)

Tumor perfused voxels

4. ET-A antag. «qualitatively» improves tumor perfusion (DCE-MRI)

CONCLUSIONS

5. ET-A antag. increases IFP 6. ET-A antag. improves the efficacy of conventional chemotherapy

1. Specific tumor vascular reactivity: Endothelin Receptor A antagonist

Chemotherapy, Cyclophos. I.P. (100mg/kg, d0 and d6; 25mg/kg, d0 and d1) co-injected with ET-A antag.

1.Endogenous ET-1 production largely participates in the tumor blood flow heterogeneities.

2.ET-A antag. may wipe out such heterogeneities and improves the delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs.

ET-A antagonist Treatment:

Consequences

Implications for drugs delivery