17
RESULTS OF THE RESULTS OF THE IRTF-NMRG Workshop IRTF-NMRG Workshop Challenges for Future Research on Challenges for Future Research on Network and Service Management Network and Service Management Jointly organized with EMANICS Jointly organized with EMANICS October 2006 – SURFnet – Utrecht – the October 2006 – SURFnet – Utrecht – the Netherlands Netherlands Aiko Pras University of Twente [email protected]

Aiko Pras University of Twente [email protected]

  • Upload
    peony

  • View
    49

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

RESULTS OF THE IRTF-NMRG Workshop Challenges for Future Research on Network and Service Management Jointly organized with EMANICS October 2006 – SURFnet – Utrecht – the Netherlands. Aiko Pras University of Twente [email protected]. Structure. What is EMANICS Goals of the workshop - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

RESULTS OF THERESULTS OF THE

IRTF-NMRG WorkshopIRTF-NMRG Workshop

Challenges for Future Research on Challenges for Future Research on Network and Service ManagementNetwork and Service Management

Jointly organized with EMANICSJointly organized with EMANICSOctober 2006 – SURFnet – Utrecht – the NetherlandsOctober 2006 – SURFnet – Utrecht – the Netherlands

Aiko Pras

University of Twente

[email protected]

Page 2: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

StructureStructure

• What is EMANICS

• Goals of the workshop

• Organization of the workshop

• Future research challenges

• Conclusions

Page 3: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

What is EMANICSWhat is EMANICS

• European Sixth Framework Network of Excellence• FP6-2004-IST-026854-NoE • 1 January 2006 -> 31 December 2009• Management of the Internet and Complex Services• EMANICS themes:

– Management Principles– Management Technologies– Management Applications

Page 4: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

EMANICS MembersEMANICS Members• Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (France)• Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique (France)• University of Twente (The Netherlands)• Imperial College (United Kingdom)• International University Bremen (Germany)• KTH, Royal Institute of Technology (Sweden)• Oslo University College (Norway)• Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (Spain)• University of Federal Armed Forces Munich (Germany)• Poznań Supercomputing and Networking Centre (Poland)• University of Zürich (Switzerland)• Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich (Germany)• University of Surrey (United Kingdom)• University of Pitesti (Romania)

Page 5: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

EMANICS StructureEMANICS StructureWP0: Project management and Scientific Animation

WP1: Vision and Integration Programme

WP2: Virtual laboratory and common test-beds

WP3: Conferences, outreach and education

WP4: Electronic Dissemination environment

WP5: Standardization and technology transfer

WP6: Open source initiatives and joint software development

WP7: Scalable management

WP8: Economic management

WP9: Autonomic management

IntegrationActivities

DisseminationActivities

JointResearchActivities

Page 6: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Workshop GoalsWorkshop Goals

Goals:• Bring together researchers, operators, vendors and

technology developers• Identify promising future directions of network

management research.• Outcome should be a description of research directions

that is felt worthwhile to explore in the next 5 years.

Non-goal:• Define what management standards are needed now

Page 7: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Workshop OrganizationWorkshop Organization

• Invitation via NMRG list to submit position statements

• 20 participants:– Alcatel/Lucent, Avaya, Cisco, Ericsson, HP, Huawei, NEC– Orange France Telecom, Korea Telecom, Switch, Tiscali– Researchers from EMANICS, as well as from elsewhere– 60% from Europe

• Day 1: presentation / discussion of position statements• Day 2: parallel vendor / operator / researcher sessions• Day 2: plenary discussion of session results

Page 8: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Research challengesResearch challenges

• Management models• Distributed monitoring• Data analysis and visualization• Economic aspects of management• Uncertainty and probabilistic approaches• Ontologies• Behavior of managed systems

Page 9: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Management modelsManagement models

• We understand:– Manager-Agent approach (client-server)– Hierarchical management (DisMan, TMN)

• We do not understand– Fully distributed management (P2P, ad-hoc)– Self-* technologies (auto-configuration, stability of

control loops)

Page 10: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Distributed monitoringDistributed monitoring

• Examples of what is needed:– track number/quality of VoIP calls– find best proxies / peers (P2P)

• Goal: a lightweight, distributed monitoring layer offering aggregates of local info to applications– Sum, average, extreme, percentile, histogram, …– Difficulty: bandwidth and CPU usage -> lightweight!– Find trade-offs– Tree-based versus gossip-based protocols

Page 11: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Data Analysis and VisualizationData Analysis and Visualization

• We can create:– Topology maps for small networks– Static time series plots

• We have problems with:– Maps for large, multi-layer networks– Online analysis at Tbps– Visualization of anomalies– Real-time, interactive visualization techniques

(zooming, filtering, correlating)

Page 12: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Economic AspectsEconomic Aspects

• Most researchers focus on technical solutions• Limited research into the operational costs of

such technologies:– IntServ/DiffServ versus overprovisioning

• Research needed on models to estimate costs• Network management is risk management

Page 13: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Uncertainty and ProbabilityUncertainty and Probability

• Many researchers focus on deterministic approaches

• Scalability problems force us to rethink in terms of uncertainties and probabilistic approaches:– Probabilistic SLAs / statistical guarantees– Manager may not have a complete overview

• How to decide between probabilistic and deterministic approaches?

Page 14: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

OntologiesOntologies

• Data modelling is believed to be understood

• Research is needed:– If / how ontologies can be effectively used to

automate the implementation of management interfaces

– If/how ontologies can help to check / enforce policies and behaviour

Page 15: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Behavior of Managed SystemsBehavior of Managed Systems

• Management models usually represent state:– MIBs, CIM

• Research is needed to model and manage behavior:– Normal versus abnormal behavior– Detect resource failure, intrusions, …– Design self-stabilizing systems

Page 16: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Concluding remarksConcluding remarks

• Presentation is:– Summary of what was discussed at workshop– Represent interest of workshop attendees– http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/nmrg/

• Follow-up:– Internet-Draft (being written)– Submit overview article to IEEE ComMag– Further discussion: tomorrow’s IRTF/NMRG meeting

Page 17: Aiko Pras University of Twente a.pras@utwente.nl

Questions??Questions??