10
AIFPA March 2011 AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities Responsibilities

AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

AIFPA March 2011AIFPA March 2011

Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code ResponsibilitiesCode Responsibilities

Page 2: AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

Myths and MisunderstandingsMyths and Misunderstandings

There has often been a There has often been a disconnect between the disconnect between the Government and industry Government and industry regarding what portions of the regarding what portions of the safety system applies to what safety system applies to what facilities and activities.facilities and activities.

There is also confusion within There is also confusion within government as to what applies government as to what applies when, where, how and to whom.when, where, how and to whom.

Page 3: AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

Myths and MisunderstandingsMyths and Misunderstandings

A classic area of cross A classic area of cross government misunderstanding is government misunderstanding is the relationship between the the relationship between the “safety” components of “safety” components of Workplace Health & Safety, the Workplace Health & Safety, the Energy Resources Conservation Energy Resources Conservation Board and Municipal Affairs Board and Municipal Affairs (Safety Services and AEMA).(Safety Services and AEMA).

Page 4: AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

Myths and MisunderstandingsMyths and Misunderstandings

This is highlighted by a number of This is highlighted by a number of incidents where we have either incidents where we have either confusing or conflicting regulations confusing or conflicting regulations (directives) adopted under three (directives) adopted under three different legislative frameworksdifferent legislative frameworks Alta Fire (B, E, G) Code vs. OHS Code Alta Fire (B, E, G) Code vs. OHS Code

vs. Directive 55 et al.vs. Directive 55 et al. Authorities (and responsibilities):Authorities (and responsibilities):

to inspectto inspect to enforceto enforce to investigateto investigate to reportto report

Page 5: AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

Myths and MisunderstandingsMyths and Misunderstandings

Safety Codes Act applies Safety Codes Act applies EVERYWHERE in Alberta EVERYWHERE in Alberta (other (other than Federally owned and operated lands – FN, than Federally owned and operated lands – FN, DND, Parks Canada).DND, Parks Canada).

OH&S Code applies to all OH&S Code applies to all workplaces workplaces (other than federally regulated)(other than federally regulated)

ERCB Directives apply to all ERCB Directives apply to all licensed sites and facilities. licensed sites and facilities. (Many (Many Directives have specific exemptions – D55 exempts Directives have specific exemptions – D55 exempts oil sands facilities – what covers tanks of production oil sands facilities – what covers tanks of production liquids?)liquids?)

Page 6: AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

Fire CodeFire Code Applies to ALL industries and facilities.Applies to ALL industries and facilities. Is not overridden by OHS Code or ERCB Directives.Is not overridden by OHS Code or ERCB Directives. There are no exemptions (other than tanks at ERCB sites There are no exemptions (other than tanks at ERCB sites

& farms)& farms)

AFC 06 Div B Sentence 4.1.1.1.(2) states: Areas in process plants, where conditions must be addressed by design and operational details specific to the hazard, need not conform to this Part, where alternative protection is provided in conformance with Article 1.2.1.1. of Division A. (See Appendix A.)

A-4.1.1.1.(2) Certain areas in refineries, chemical plants and distilleries will not meet all Code requirements because of extraordinary conditions. Design should be based on good engineering practice and on such factors as manual fire suppression equipment, daily inspections, automated transfer systems, location of processing units, and special containment systems, piping, controls and materials used. NFPA 30, “Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code,” and NFPA 36, “Solvent Extraction Plants,” are examples of good engineering practice and can be referred to by the designer and the authority having jurisdiction.

Div A Sentence 1.2.1.1. (1) Compliance with this Code shall be achieved by a) complying with the applicable acceptable solutions in Division B (see

Appendix A), or b) using alternative solutions that will achieve at least the minimum level of

performance required by Division B in the areas defined by the objectives and functional statements attributed to the applicable acceptable solutions (see Appendix A).

Page 7: AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

Fire CodeFire Code Delivery of Flammable and Combustible LiquidsDelivery of Flammable and Combustible Liquids

4.11.3.4. Supervision 1) During loading and unloading of a tank vehicle, trained personnel

shall be in a position to shut off the flow of liquid in an emergency. 4.11.3.7. Unloading

1) Before a tank vehicle is unloaded, the volume of liquid in the receiving tank shall be measured to ensure that the tank can accept the volume to be unloaded.

4.1.6.4. Notification (1) When a loss of flammable liquid or combustible liquid occurs due to a spill or leak, or as indicated by any of the leak detection measures in Section 4.4., the owner shall ensure that

a) appropriate action is taken as required in Sentences 4.1.6.3.(2) and (3), and Sentence 4.4.1.3.(1), and

b) if the quantity of liquid spilled or leaked exceeds 50 L in aggregate or is sufficient to cause a sheen on nearby surface water

i) the fire department shall be notified immediately, and ii) the authority having jurisdiction shall be notified in writing

within 24 h.

The Ministry has successfully prosecuted those who fail to comply and is working to both increase the penalties under the SCA as well as clarify/simplify the methods of laying charges.

Page 8: AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

InvestigationsInvestigations

SCA Admin Items Reg states in SCA Admin Items Reg states in Section 8 that:Section 8 that: All fires where there is death, injury or All fires where there is death, injury or

“property” is damaged or destroyed “property” is damaged or destroyed must be reported to a fire SCO having must be reported to a fire SCO having jurisdiction. jurisdiction. (forest fires (forest fires onlyonly exemption) exemption)

A fire SCO must investigate the cause A fire SCO must investigate the cause and origin of EVERY fire noted above.and origin of EVERY fire noted above.

Section 9 notes that the SCO above Section 9 notes that the SCO above must file a report to the Fire must file a report to the Fire Commissioner within 30 days of Commissioner within 30 days of occurrence (initial report).occurrence (initial report).

Page 9: AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

InvestigationsInvestigations

Concerns about fire reporting across the Concerns about fire reporting across the province.province.

MA (SS & AEMA) and the SCC are working MA (SS & AEMA) and the SCC are working on improving the completeness, timeliness on improving the completeness, timeliness and accuracy of fire reporting under the and accuracy of fire reporting under the SCA from municipal, SCA from municipal, corporatecorporate and and unaccredited areas.unaccredited areas.

AHJ often either not notified, or sometimes AHJ often either not notified, or sometimes excluded from, investigation of fires at excluded from, investigation of fires at industrial, particularly incidents at industrial, particularly incidents at exploration/extraction, sites.exploration/extraction, sites.

WH&S and ERCB staff not aware of SCA WH&S and ERCB staff not aware of SCA requirements.requirements.

Page 10: AIFPA March 2011 Safety Codes Act and Alberta Fire Code Responsibilities

InvestigationsInvestigations

The question of what is reportable is confusing, The question of what is reportable is confusing, particularly in an industrial setting where unplanned particularly in an industrial setting where unplanned releases of product (property?) are burnt but in a releases of product (property?) are burnt but in a manner which the system has been designed to manner which the system has been designed to handle or suppress in a controlled manner and handle or suppress in a controlled manner and which are seen as a regular occurrence and often a which are seen as a regular occurrence and often a “cost of business”. (product flares, haul truck tire “cost of business”. (product flares, haul truck tire fires?)fires?)

The confusion also arises where a relatively minor The confusion also arises where a relatively minor fire (steam, welding, other heat?) causes a “burn” fire (steam, welding, other heat?) causes a “burn” injury.injury.

Are there guidelines which the Ministry, Are there guidelines which the Ministry, Municipalities and Industry can/should develop as Municipalities and Industry can/should develop as to what is and is not reportable (value, size, to what is and is not reportable (value, size, complexity, time)?complexity, time)?

Does setting limits potentially reduce the value of Does setting limits potentially reduce the value of the Fire Reporting System which is used to drive the Fire Reporting System which is used to drive public safety policy and education efforts.public safety policy and education efforts.