24
The Integration of Process Safety into a Chemical Reaction Engineering Course: the Review of the T-2 Incident Ronald J. Willey, Northeastern University, Boston, MA H. Scott Fogler, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Michael B. Cutlip, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT

AICHEMeet_339b_10

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

t2 explosion

Citation preview

  • The Integration of Process Safety into a Chemical Reaction

    Engineering Course: the Review of the T-2 Incident

    Ronald J. Willey, Northeastern University, Boston, MAH. Scott Fogler, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIMichael B. Cutlip, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT

  • Objectives/Outline

    Introduce you to a textbook example that will appear in the newest edition of H.Scott Fogler, Essentials of Chemical Reaction Engineering

    This example appears in Chapter 13 of the new book. Unsteady-State Non isothermal Reactor Design

    Methods used to model the reaction

    Demonstration of integration of Polymath to solve the problem

  • Text book problem statementExample 13-6 T2 Laboratories Explosion

    Figure E13-6.1 Aerial photograph of T2 taken December 20, 2007.

    Courtesy of Chemical Safety Board.

    This example was co-authored by Professors Ronald J. Willey, Northeastern University,

    Michael B. Cutlip, University of Connecticut and H. Scott Fogler, University of Michigan.

  • Opening paragraph example statement

    T2 Laboratories manufactured a fuel additive methylcyclopentadienyl manganese

    tricarbonyl (MCMT) in a 2,450-gallon high-pressure batch reactor utilizing a three-

    step batch process.

    Step 1a. The liquid-phase metalation reaction between methylcyclopentadiene

    (MCP) and sodium in a solvent of diethylene glycol dimethyl ether (diglyme) to

    produce sodium methylcyclopentadiene and hydrogen gas:

    + Na

    Na

    +

    1

    2 H2

    Hydrogen immediately comes out of the solution and is vented at the top in

    the gas head space.

  • We included the previously unknown Reaction 2

    diglyme decomposition 3 moles of gas and tar plus heat

    3 moles of gas + tar +HEAT!

  • Reactor Details

    2450 gallons [~9,000 dm3] batch reactor

    Working volume of 2,000 gallons

    Made of 3 steel

    Working pressure was 600 psig (4.13 MPa)

    Original design rating was 1200 psig (8.27 MPa)

    Relief was a 4 diameter rupture disc inserted into a 4 line.

    Rupture disc setting was 400 psig.

  • Figure 8 Reactor

    Cross Section

  • Problem statement rendition

    Cooling jacket water inlet

    Cooling jacket steam outlet

  • Adiabatic Reaction Calorimetry used for kinetic constants estimates

    reaction 1 exotherm

    diglyme decomposition

  • Simplified Model

    A = sodium,

    B = methycyclopentadiene

    S = Solvent (diglyme)

    (1) A + B C + 1/2 D (gas)

    (2) S 3 E (gas) + F

    Initial temperature 422 K (300F)

  • Reaction Kinetics

    Reaction 1: Overall 2nd order, first order in Na and MCP

    r1A = k1CACB

    k1A = 5.73 102 dm3 mol1 hr1

    E1 = 128,000 J/mol K*

    *Later modeling reduced this to 40,000 J/mol K

  • Reaction Kinetics Reaction 2

    First order in solvent only:

    r2S = k2*CS

    k2S = 9.41 1016 hr1

    E2 = 800,000 J/mol K*

    * Later information provided 80,000 J/mol K

  • Heat of Reactions

    The heats of reaction are constant.

    HRx1A = 45,400 J/mol

    HRx2S = 3.2 105 J/mol

  • Assumptions provided in the example

    Liquid volume, V0 = 4,000 dm3

    Vapor space, VV = 5,000 dm3.

    Ideal gas law

    Venting given by this estimate (P-1)Cv, Cv1= 3,360 mol/hratm for the 1 vent line.

    Cv2 = 53,600 mol/hratm for the 4 vent line.

    The reactor fails when the pressure exceeds 45 atm or the temperature exceeds 600 K.

  • Problem Statement

    Plot and analyze the reactor temperature and head space pressure as a function of time along with the reactant and product concentrations for the scenario where the reactor cooling fails to work (UA = 0). In problem P13-2(f) you will be asked to redo the problem when the cooling water comes on as expected whenever the reactor temperature exceeds 455 K.

  • (1) Reactor Mole Balances

    Reactor (Assume Constant Volume Batch)

    Liquid

    1A

    A

    dCr

    dt (E13-6.1)

    dCS

    dt r2S (E13-6.2)

    (2) Head Space Mole Balances

    Let Ng = H2 + CO

    For H2 and CO in the head space.

    From the text book example solution

  • (5) Energy Balance

    Applying Equation (E13-18) to a batch system (Fi0 = 0)

    jPj

    aSRxSARxA

    CN

    TTUAHrHrV

    dt

    dT

    22110 (E13-6.18)

    Substituting for the rate laws and

    N jCP j

    dT

    dtk1AHRx1ACACB k2SCS UA T Ta

    1.26 107 J K (E13-6.19)

    (6

    From the text book example solution

  • (6) Numerical Solutions Tricks of the Trade

    A rapid change of temperature and pressure is expected as reaction (2) starts to run-away. This typically results in a stiff system of ordinary differential equations, which can become numerically unstable and generate incorrect results. This instability can be prevented by using a software switch that will set all derivates to zero when the reactor reaches the explosion temperature or pressure. This switch can have the following form in Polymath and can be multiplied by the right hand side of all the differential equations in this problem. Here the dynamics will be halted when the T become higher that 600 K or the pressure exceeds 45 atm.

    SW1 = if (T>600 or P>45) then (0) else (1)

  • Polymath Code (first few lines)

    # Reactor volumesV0= 4000 # dm3VH= 5000 # dm3

    # Initial concentrationsCA(0)=4.3 #mol sodium/dm3CB(0)=5.1 # mol methylcyclopentadienel/dm3CS(0)=3 # mol of Diglyme/dm3

    # Heat of reactionsDHRx1A=-45400 # J/mol NaDHRx2S=-3.2E5 # J/mol of Diglyme

    # Sum of product of cp and mass of liquid-phase components in reactorcpSYS=1.26E7 #J/K

  • Screen capture of Polymath

  • Simulation shown in Text UA=0

  • Later work, with more information

  • Three scenarios compared

  • Questions?