Upload
hamdan-yusoff
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
t2 explosion
Citation preview
The Integration of Process Safety into a Chemical Reaction
Engineering Course: the Review of the T-2 Incident
Ronald J. Willey, Northeastern University, Boston, MAH. Scott Fogler, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIMichael B. Cutlip, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
Objectives/Outline
Introduce you to a textbook example that will appear in the newest edition of H.Scott Fogler, Essentials of Chemical Reaction Engineering
This example appears in Chapter 13 of the new book. Unsteady-State Non isothermal Reactor Design
Methods used to model the reaction
Demonstration of integration of Polymath to solve the problem
Text book problem statementExample 13-6 T2 Laboratories Explosion
Figure E13-6.1 Aerial photograph of T2 taken December 20, 2007.
Courtesy of Chemical Safety Board.
This example was co-authored by Professors Ronald J. Willey, Northeastern University,
Michael B. Cutlip, University of Connecticut and H. Scott Fogler, University of Michigan.
Opening paragraph example statement
T2 Laboratories manufactured a fuel additive methylcyclopentadienyl manganese
tricarbonyl (MCMT) in a 2,450-gallon high-pressure batch reactor utilizing a three-
step batch process.
Step 1a. The liquid-phase metalation reaction between methylcyclopentadiene
(MCP) and sodium in a solvent of diethylene glycol dimethyl ether (diglyme) to
produce sodium methylcyclopentadiene and hydrogen gas:
+ Na
Na
+
1
2 H2
Hydrogen immediately comes out of the solution and is vented at the top in
the gas head space.
We included the previously unknown Reaction 2
diglyme decomposition 3 moles of gas and tar plus heat
3 moles of gas + tar +HEAT!
Reactor Details
2450 gallons [~9,000 dm3] batch reactor
Working volume of 2,000 gallons
Made of 3 steel
Working pressure was 600 psig (4.13 MPa)
Original design rating was 1200 psig (8.27 MPa)
Relief was a 4 diameter rupture disc inserted into a 4 line.
Rupture disc setting was 400 psig.
Figure 8 Reactor
Cross Section
Problem statement rendition
Cooling jacket water inlet
Cooling jacket steam outlet
Adiabatic Reaction Calorimetry used for kinetic constants estimates
reaction 1 exotherm
diglyme decomposition
Simplified Model
A = sodium,
B = methycyclopentadiene
S = Solvent (diglyme)
(1) A + B C + 1/2 D (gas)
(2) S 3 E (gas) + F
Initial temperature 422 K (300F)
Reaction Kinetics
Reaction 1: Overall 2nd order, first order in Na and MCP
r1A = k1CACB
k1A = 5.73 102 dm3 mol1 hr1
E1 = 128,000 J/mol K*
*Later modeling reduced this to 40,000 J/mol K
Reaction Kinetics Reaction 2
First order in solvent only:
r2S = k2*CS
k2S = 9.41 1016 hr1
E2 = 800,000 J/mol K*
* Later information provided 80,000 J/mol K
Heat of Reactions
The heats of reaction are constant.
HRx1A = 45,400 J/mol
HRx2S = 3.2 105 J/mol
Assumptions provided in the example
Liquid volume, V0 = 4,000 dm3
Vapor space, VV = 5,000 dm3.
Ideal gas law
Venting given by this estimate (P-1)Cv, Cv1= 3,360 mol/hratm for the 1 vent line.
Cv2 = 53,600 mol/hratm for the 4 vent line.
The reactor fails when the pressure exceeds 45 atm or the temperature exceeds 600 K.
Problem Statement
Plot and analyze the reactor temperature and head space pressure as a function of time along with the reactant and product concentrations for the scenario where the reactor cooling fails to work (UA = 0). In problem P13-2(f) you will be asked to redo the problem when the cooling water comes on as expected whenever the reactor temperature exceeds 455 K.
(1) Reactor Mole Balances
Reactor (Assume Constant Volume Batch)
Liquid
1A
A
dCr
dt (E13-6.1)
dCS
dt r2S (E13-6.2)
(2) Head Space Mole Balances
Let Ng = H2 + CO
For H2 and CO in the head space.
From the text book example solution
(5) Energy Balance
Applying Equation (E13-18) to a batch system (Fi0 = 0)
jPj
aSRxSARxA
CN
TTUAHrHrV
dt
dT
22110 (E13-6.18)
Substituting for the rate laws and
N jCP j
dT
dtk1AHRx1ACACB k2SCS UA T Ta
1.26 107 J K (E13-6.19)
(6
From the text book example solution
(6) Numerical Solutions Tricks of the Trade
A rapid change of temperature and pressure is expected as reaction (2) starts to run-away. This typically results in a stiff system of ordinary differential equations, which can become numerically unstable and generate incorrect results. This instability can be prevented by using a software switch that will set all derivates to zero when the reactor reaches the explosion temperature or pressure. This switch can have the following form in Polymath and can be multiplied by the right hand side of all the differential equations in this problem. Here the dynamics will be halted when the T become higher that 600 K or the pressure exceeds 45 atm.
SW1 = if (T>600 or P>45) then (0) else (1)
Polymath Code (first few lines)
# Reactor volumesV0= 4000 # dm3VH= 5000 # dm3
# Initial concentrationsCA(0)=4.3 #mol sodium/dm3CB(0)=5.1 # mol methylcyclopentadienel/dm3CS(0)=3 # mol of Diglyme/dm3
# Heat of reactionsDHRx1A=-45400 # J/mol NaDHRx2S=-3.2E5 # J/mol of Diglyme
# Sum of product of cp and mass of liquid-phase components in reactorcpSYS=1.26E7 #J/K
Screen capture of Polymath
Simulation shown in Text UA=0
Later work, with more information
Three scenarios compared
Questions?