14
Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop [email protected]

Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Agriculture and Water Resources

Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos

AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop

[email protected]

Page 2: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Availability of water for agriculture in the coming decades depends not only on changing climate, but also on population, economic development, and technology

Linking Regional Water Supplies and Water Demands

Page 3: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Water Availability: Five International Case Studies

Rosenzweig et al., 1999, 2001

Linking a suite of models in order to improve projections of water availability, by taking potential changes in both water supply and demand into account.

WATBALStreamflow

PET

WATBALStreamflow

PET

CLIMATEPrecip., Temp.

Solar Rad.

CLIMATEPrecip., Temp.

Solar Rad.

WEAP

EvaluationPlanning

WEAP

EvaluationPlanning

CERESCrop water

demand

CERESCrop water

demand

CROPWATRegionalirrigation

CROPWATRegionalirrigation

SCENARIOSGCMs

variability

SCENARIOSGCMs

variability

SCENARIOSPopulation, Development,

Technology

SCENARIOSPopulation, Development,

Technology

• Runoff, water demands, and water system reliability

• Environmental stress due to human use of water resources

• Crop yields based on consistent projections of changes in water supply and demand

Page 4: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Cynthia Rosenzweig1, David C. Major1, Kenneth Strzepek2, Ana Iglesias1, David Yates2, Alyssa Holt2, and Daniel Hillel1

China

Rest

USA

BrazilArgentina

Hungary & Romania

China

Rest

USA

Brazil

Argentina

Hungary & Romania (<0.01%)

Maize production in 1998

Soybean production in 1998

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Brazil China US

1995

Low

High

Population (millions)2020

Page 5: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

SCENARIOSGCMs

variability

SCENARIOSGCMs

variability

Dailyclimate

(34 sites)

Monthlyclimate

(27 water regions)

ProcessmodelsCERES

SOYGRO

Yields Irrigation

Phenology PET, ETc

Kc

CLIMATECHANGEEFFECTS Phenology

CO2 Kc

Empiricalmodel

CROPWAT

Net irrigationall crops

TOTALIRRIGATION

DEMAND

REGIONALDATABASES

Crops Soils

YieldsManagement

Spatialdatabase

Crop areasIrrig. efficiency

Crop yields and water demands

are estimated with process based crop models (calibrated and validated).

The ratios (Kc) between simulated and actual crop ET are used to estimate regional water demand with CROPWAT.

Irrigation demand is adjusted by a regional irrigation efficiency.

Crop water demand model interactions

Page 6: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Water supply calculated using WATBAL

PET calculation by Priestley-Taylor (ensuring consistency with the crop models

WATBAL is run for 50 yrs of climate change and variability scenarios, using SAMS WG.

Schematic of WATBAL processesModeled vs. observed monthly runoff for the Titsza water region.

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

Oct

-79

Oct

-80

Oct

-81

Oct

-82

Oct

-83

Oct

-84

Oct

-85

Oct

-86

mm

/day

R2 = 0.55Ann. avg mod. = 208 mmAnn. avg obs. = 213 mm

ModeledObserved

Sub-surfacerunoff

Soil moisture zone

EvapotranspirationEffective precipitation

Surfacerunoff

Baseflow

Relativedepth

Kaczmarek, 1993; Yates, 1996Ken Strzepek, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder

Page 7: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Harbin (China)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Day of Year

ET

0 (m

m/d

ay)

HARA

w bHARA

Dier Songhua Jian

Nen Jian

Songhua Jian

Grand Island (Nebraska)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Day of Year

ET

0 (m

m/d

ay)

GNEA

w bGNEA

Low er Missouri

Working with Multiple Models: Consistency at different Spatial Scales

Page 8: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Balance of water supply and demand is undertaken in the Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) model.

Population and GDP drivers are used to calculate future industrial, municipal, and domestic water use, and forecast increases in irrigation areas. (UN population forecasts and economic forecasts of The Netherlands Central Planning Bureau.)

WEAP schematic for the water regions in the US Corn Belt

Stockholm Environment Institute, 1997Boston, MA

Page 9: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Current MPI GFDL GISS

0

2

4

6

Danube Argentina Brazil China USA

An

nu

al R

un

off

(m3 x

1011

)

50

60

70

80

90

100

Danube Argentina Brazil China US

An

nu

al R

elia

bil

ity

(%)

Change in annual runoff and water reliability for the 2020s with change climate scenarios

Page 10: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Possible decadalsurprises

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 00

1 99 0 2 00 0 2 01 0 2 02 0 2 04 0 2 04 0 2 05 0

Year

Per

cent

age

R eliab ilityD em and m et

400

300

200

100

50O N D

MonthsJ F M A M J J A S

Run

off

(cfs

) CurrentGFDLMPIHCChange in

seasonality

Key Water Resource Results

Strzepek et al., 1999

Page 11: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Demand to supply ratio (environmental stress) measures degree of economic development and impacts on ecosystems.

If the demand to supply ratio is low, then there is ample water for ecosystem services.

Projected change in environmental stress for the Danube water regions

Medium stressHigh stress

Low stressNo stress

Reference 1995 Reference 2010

GISS 2010 GISS 2020

Reference 2020

Page 12: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

P1 Juvenile phase (growing degree days base 8 C from emergence to end of the juvenile phase)

P2 Photoperiod sensitivity

P5 Grain filling duration (growing degree days base 8 form silking to physiological maturity)

G2 Potential kernel number

G5 Potential kernel weight (growth rate)

Crop Coefficients Corn

Adaptation: Optimizing crop varieties

P1

P2P5

G2G5

P1

P2P5

G2G5

Page 13: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Irrigation Demand mm/ha Base ClimateEffect of Cultivar and Planting Date

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Cultivars

day 100

day 110

day 120

day 130

Testing adaptation with crop models

Nitrogen Leaching (kg/ha) Base ClimateEffect of Cultivar and Planting Date

15.3

15.4

15.5

15.6

15.7

15.8

15.9

16

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Cultivars

day 130

Page 14: Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

Nitrogen Leached: Effect of Precipitation

47.848.1

47.950.4

47.848.1

47.9

50.4

0 50 100 150 200 250

1

2

3

4

. sowing to flowering floweing to maturity

434

469.3

483.1

493.8

400 420 440 460 480 500

1

2

3

4

growing season precipitation

10.912.6

14.115.7

0 5 10 15 20

1

2

3

4

nitrogen leached

Corn Growing Season

Growing Season Precipitation

Nitrogen Leached