STATE HIGH PROJECT PLANNING MEETING

October 28, 2013

Crabtree, Rohrbaugh & Associates, Architects

Agenda

Revised Option 1Floor PlansSite Plan

Revised Option 2Floor PlansSite Plan

Project Examples

Option 1 vs. 2 Characteristics

Preliminary LEED Checklist

State High - Option -1

Composite Floor Plan

State High - Option -1

Renovation

New Construction

Composite Floor Plan

State High - Option -1Potential

Potential

State High - Option - 2

Composite Floor Plan

State High - Option - 2

RenovationNew Construction

State High - Option -2Potential

Potential

Option Characteristics

1. Area of Demolition near equal.2. Area of Renovation near equal.3. Anticipate Option 2 will be more efficient.

State High Option - 1 State High Option - 2

Project Commons

Large Group Instruction

Food Court / Cafe

Food Court / Cafe

Outdoor Student Spaces

State High - Option -1

• Concentrates construction to grass area

• Impact to play field area• Program adjacency

distance • Building organization• Simplified Phasing• Larger building area / sf• Does not accommodate

loop road

State High - Option -2

• Concentrates construction to parking area

• Impact to parking• Preferred program adjacency• Optimum building organization• Comparable Phasing• Smaller building area• Site circulation achieves

connection between North and South, Community Fields

• Continuous loop road for buses

Preliminary LEED Checklist

Community Connectivity

Questions and Comments

18