16
Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 30‐31 March 2012 Analog Forestry as an Art Form “Art is not what you see, but what you make others see”, Edgar Degas (1834-1917) Ranil Senanayake Abstract: Analog Forestry (Senanayake 1987) arose from a need to expand habitat for biodiversity within anthropogenic (human managed) ecosystems. It is a form of ecological restoration that seeks to design ecosystems processes and structures that mimic the original. It is an intentional activity that initiates or accelerates the recovery of an ecosystem with respect to its health, integrity and sustainability as defined by Ecological Restoration (SER 2004) but has also been described as containing elements that could lend itself as an art form (Senanayake and Palihawadana 1999). Indeed in the traditions of modern art, attention to the designs in nature in a conceptual way has given rise to conceptual art where the idea or concept is the most important aspect of the work. When an artist uses a conceptual form of art, it means that all of the planning and decisions are made beforehand and the execution is a perfunctory affair (LeWitt 1967). The idea becomes a machine that makes the art. Often, a natural process is understood as art, only when it is frozen in time and appears in a museum. Works of Art, even conceptual works, tend to be embedded in some form of object or structure. The depiction of Sri Lanka in the ‘Lagoon Cycle’ (Harrison 1986) is a case in point Analog Forestry requires creativity from the designer so that a monotony of form and function does not manifest. The knowledge of the various physical and ecological attributes allowing the designer to select for color, texture, presence of birds, butterflies etc. in addition to utilitarian functions such as provision of food, medicines, fiber etc. (Senanayake and Jack 1998). It requires the designer to consider the texture of the forest by considerations such as the relative proportions of emergent, canopy or sub‐canopy species in the design or the presence and proportions of growth forms such as epiphytes or lianas. It requires the designer to consider the capacity of the design to sustain populations of native biodiversity etc., but it also requires the designer to be creative. Aspects such as color and placement depend much on the vision of the designer, especially as the full design may not manifest for many years after establishment. This design, being analogous to nature would seem to produce aesthetically and functionally superior landscapes. Analog Forestry provides a tool with which to do so. Keywords: Landscape Aesthetics, Analog Forestry, and Conceptual Art

Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

AestheticStudiesConference,RoyalAsiaticSociety,Colombo,SriLanka,30‐31March2012

AnalogForestryasanArtForm

“Artisnotwhatyousee,butwhatyoumakeotherssee”,EdgarDegas(1834­1917)

RanilSenanayake

Abstract:

AnalogForestry(Senanayake1987)arosefromaneedtoexpandhabitatforbiodiversitywithinanthropogenic(humanmanaged)ecosystems.Itisaformofecologicalrestorationthatseekstodesignecosystemsprocessesandstructuresthatmimictheoriginal.Itisanintentionalactivitythatinitiatesoracceleratestherecoveryofanecosystemwithrespecttoitshealth,integrityandsustainabilityasdefinedbyEcologicalRestoration(SER2004)buthasalsobeendescribedascontainingelementsthatcouldlenditselfasanartform(SenanayakeandPalihawadana1999).Indeedinthetraditionsofmodernart,attentiontothedesignsinnatureinaconceptualwayhasgivenrisetoconceptualartwheretheideaorconceptisthemostimportantaspectofthework.Whenanartistusesaconceptualformofart,itmeansthatalloftheplanninganddecisionsaremadebeforehandandtheexecutionisaperfunctoryaffair(LeWitt1967).Theideabecomesamachinethatmakestheart.Often,anaturalprocessisunderstoodasart,onlywhenitisfrozenintimeandappearsinamuseum.WorksofArt,evenconceptualworks,tendtobeembeddedinsomeformofobjectorstructure.ThedepictionofSriLankainthe‘LagoonCycle’(Harrison1986)isacaseinpoint AnalogForestryrequirescreativityfromthedesignersothatamonotonyofformandfunctiondoesnotmanifest.Theknowledgeofthevariousphysicalandecologicalattributesallowingthedesignertoselectforcolor,texture,presenceofbirds,butterfliesetc.inadditiontoutilitarianfunctionssuchasprovisionoffood,medicines,fiberetc.(SenanayakeandJack1998).Itrequiresthedesignertoconsiderthetextureoftheforestbyconsiderationssuchastherelativeproportionsofemergent,canopyorsub‐canopyspeciesinthedesignorthepresenceandproportionsofgrowthformssuchasepiphytesorlianas.Itrequiresthedesignertoconsiderthecapacityofthedesigntosustainpopulationsofnativebiodiversityetc.,butitalsorequiresthedesignertobecreative.Aspectssuchascolorandplacementdependmuchonthevisionofthedesigner,especiallyasthefulldesignmaynotmanifestformanyyearsafterestablishment.Thisdesign,beinganalogoustonaturewouldseemtoproduceaestheticallyandfunctionallysuperiorlandscapes.AnalogForestryprovidesatoolwithwhichtodoso.

Keywords:LandscapeAesthetics,AnalogForestry,andConceptualArt

Page 2: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

Introduction:AnalogForestry,isasystemofrestoringthetreedominatedecosysteminanyarea,mimickingthestructureandfunctionsoftheoriginal‘forest’thatonceexistedinthatarea(Senanayake2004).Thedesignisguidedbytwelveprinciples(Table1)ofwhichthemostpertinenttothisdiscussionisprinciple12:‘Respondcreatively’.Thissuggestsboththecreativeuseoftheotherelevenandfreedomtoexpressthegenerationofaestheticsonthelandscape.ItreliesgreatlyontheabilityofnaturetorespondtotheimperativeofmaturingintoaforestAsHarrison(2011)notes:‘Tobegin,youhaveanidea,baseduponalotofknowledge,thatwhenyouapplyitinaconstructlikeananalogforest,natureactingopportunistically,willuseittoself‐complicate.Thereforethereisatheoryofhownaturebehavesthatpermitsanalogforestrytowork.”Table1.

PrinciplesofAnalogForestry.

Principle 1 Observe and Record Thematureecosystemofanyarearepresentstheoutcomeofeonsofexperienceindealingwiththeclimateandimpactsatthatplace.Recordthespeciesandecosystemspresentintheareaundertreatment.Theinitialdatawillassistinsettingabaselineagainstwhichfutureobservationstheirchangescanbeevaluated.Recordingisalsoofimportanceinevaluatingthestructureandtextureoftheoriginal,whichprovidesthemodeltowardswhichwemustdesign.Aphysiognomicformulaofthevegetationtypesontheland.IdentifyingthestructureofthesystemwilldemonstrateawiderangeofdifferentarchitecturalresponsesvaryingfromtreestolianasandpointtowardstheendgoalindesignPrinciple 2 Understand and Evaluate Understandtheecosystembeingobservedinasmanyperspectivesaspossible.Asynthesisofmanyvariableswillalwaysyieldbetterchoicesofthespeciesandpatternstobeusedindesign.Thisiswhentheobservationsandrecordsmustbesynthesizedwithasmuchscientificandtraditionalinformationaspossible.Thegenerationofthedatabaseonthevegetationspeciesthatare(were)presentintheareaandthepotentialnewspeciestobeconsideredisacriticalpartofrecordingandshouldbeinitiatedattheinceptionoftheproject.

Page 3: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

Principle 3 know your land Apowerfultool,inunderstandingthelandisacarefullydrawnoutmapthatidentifiesthemostpertinentfeaturesoftheland.Mappingthelandisbestdoneifdevelopedasaseriesofoverlays.Oncethephysicalboundarieshavebeenmapped,overlaysthatdemarcatethecontours,thehedges,fencelines,vegetation,soils,winddirectionandwaterflowaresomeusefulvariables.ThelandscapemaportheForestGardenFarmPlan(FGFP)shouldreflectnotonlythecurrentsituationbutalsothedesiredfuturecondition.

Principle 4 identify levels of yield Theyieldrequiredwilldifferdependingontheprioritiesofthelandownerormanager.Ifthegoalisconservationtheyieldwillbemeasuredbyincreasesinthetargetspecies,ifthegoaliseconomicgaintheyieldwillbemeasuredintermsofincomeorproduction.Ifthedemandforyieldisfocusedonasinglecropthehighertheyieldrequiredthemoretheproductionsystemwouldmovetowardsasinglespeciesmonoculture

Principle 5. Map out flow and reservoir systems Everylandscapehasflowsystems,solid,liquid,gasandgeneticthatproducesdistinctpatterns.Usuallythedirectionofflowinsolids,liquidsandgassesisgovernedbygravity,resultingintheverycharacteristicdrainagepattersofwaterorsoilflowingonland.Similarlywindmovingacrossthelandscapeproducesomesignificantpatterns,whilegenesusuallyfollowexistingcorridorsofecosystemsconduciveforthatspecies.

Theunderstandingoftheflowsystemsacrossthefarmorlandareatobemanagedisimportanttosettingthedesign.Cuttingacrossflowsystemsisusuallynotproductive.Following,augmentingoramelioratingflowsystemstoenhancetheecosystemundermanagementwillimproveproductivity. Principle6Reduceratioofexternalenergyinproduction

Allecosystemsuseenergytomaintaintheiridentity.Inagriculturalecosystems,productivityisagoalandenergyisexpendedatmeetingthisgoal.Oftenenergysubsidiesfromoutsidethefarmhavetobeprovided.Asanincreaseintheflowofenergytendstoorganizeandsimplifythesystem,increasesinexternalenergyinputsimpactbothbiodiversityandsustainability.Increasesofenergytoanecosystemrepresentameasurebywhichecosystemmodificationcanbeaddressed.

Principle7beguidedbylandscapeneeds.

Allfarminglandwillbeapartofanaturallandscape.Theboundariesofwhichareoftensetbydefinition.Acommoncriteriontodelineatealandscapeisonawatershedbasis.Onceidentified,eachlandscapeisdividedintovariousreplicatingunits,suchasopenfields,treecoveredareas,homesteads,roads,streamsetc.Alandscapewilloftenhavemanyvegetationcomponentsrangingfrommaturenativevegetationtoopenmeadows.Thepatchesofremnantvegetationoftenbeingtheonlyhabitatleftfornativebiodiversity.

Page 4: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

Indesign,definingthespeciesoftreetobeusedinarevegetationcontextandknowingitsecologicalroleensuresthatthespecieschosenwillbearesourceforanothergroupoforganismsnotaddressedbymererevegetationneeds.Asimilarrecognitionofthevalueofhierarchicalstructuringusingabiotic,bioticandculturalsubsystemscanprovideaplanningframework.

Principle8Followecologicalsuccession

Inthedevelopmentofaforestsystemmaturitybringschangesinthetrophicweb,whicharedemonstratedbychangesinspeciescomposition.Thesesuccessionalseriesallmaintainaboutanequallevelofspeciesateachlevel,butthecompositionofthespeciesrepresentedchangeswiththechangeinvegetation.

Indesigningforstructure,theseralstagethatisbestsuitedforthecropschosenprovidesthemodel.Thus,ifthecropsinquestionareannuals,suchascerealgrain,beans,squashesetc.thepioneerstagesprovidethemodel.Ifthecropsinquestionareperennialssuchascoffee,fruitetc,thelaterseralstagesprovidethemodel.Thepioneerstagesinmostecosystemsarediverseandincorporatearangeofplanttypescapableofhighproductivity,apatternoftenreflectedintraditionalagriculture.Theearlyseralstagesofforestecosystems,providethenextgrowthorbuildingupphase

Principle 9 Utilize ecological processes Incorporationofecologicalprocessesintodesignalwayscontributestofurtherstability.Allecosystemsaredrivenbyaseriesofprocessessomeofwhicharesignificantimportantandcontributetomaintainingstabilityandproductivity.Ecologicalprocessesineveryecosystem,allowforincreasesinefficiencythroughmanagement.

Theidentificationofkeyecologicalprocessessuchasedgeeffects,wheretheecotoneortheboundarybetweentwoecosystemsfacilitatesahigherbiodiversitymeasure.Keystonespeciesreferringtospeciesonwhichthepersistenceofalargenumberofotherspeciesontheecosystemdependsandwhoseimpactsaregreaterthanwouldbeexpectedfromitsrelativeabundanceortotalbiomass.Theuseofindicatorspecies,organismsthatcorrespondtoacertainlevelorstateofbiodiversity,areprocessesthatwillenablethedesignofaneffectiveandelegantmodel.

Principle10ValueBiodiversity

Biodiversityhasbeenperceivedinmanywaysovertheages.Itreflectsthepatternwroughtinbiomass.Itprovidesthevarietyofourlivingworldandhasbeenthesourceofhumaninspirationacrossculturesandages.Biodiversityprovidesboththematerialaswellastheindicatorsforsustainablelandmanagement.Inmoderntimesitisinvaluableasamanagementtool,asthelevelofbiodiversityisaneffectivemeasureofthehealthofecosystems.Biodiversitymeasureshavealsobeencorrelatedwithenvironmentalstabilityaswellasthesustainabilityofagriculturalandforestrypractices.

Page 5: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

Biodiversityisanissuetoday,becausethathumaninspirationcannotbeappreciatedbyanon‐humansystem.Thebeautyandwonderofthelivingworldcannothavemeaninginthemarketplace,oneconsequence,isthatbiodiversityhasretreatedbeforetheonslaughtofthemonoculturesofeconomicexpediency.

Principle 11 Respect Maturity Maturityistheendconditionallecosystemstendtodeveloptowards.Itrepresentstheabilitytostaysustainableinagivengeographicalsite.Seralsuccessionorthegradualchangingofspeciesandstructuresinanecosystemasitmovestowardsmaturityisasingularlyimportantconsiderationindesign.Maturityisaprocessmorethananendcondition.Matureecosystemsareusuallyhigherinbiomass,thoughnotnecessarilyinbiodiversitythanmoreimmaturesystems.Asmaturityconfersstability,everyelementofalandscapethatcanmatureshouldbeencouragedtodoso.

Principle 12 Respond creatively Naturedoesnotproduceidenticalpatternsatanecosystemiclevel.Everylandscapeanditsassociatedecosystemshaveuniquecharacteristics,someatalevelsignificantfordesign,othersnot.Everylandscape,everyecosystemhasnestledwithinitmanymore.Workingatthevegetationscale,everydesignercanbeanartistwhoselimitationisthepaletteathand.Thedatabasemaybeincomplete,therangeofspeciesavailablemaybepoor,dataontheregionmaybelacking.Familiaritywiththelandscapeorecosystemisoftensuperiortopoordata.Thechoiceofspeciesandtheirpatternofplacementwillreflectonlandscapeaestheticsaswellasbiodiversitydistribution.Allthisrequiresthedesignertorespondskillfullyandcreatively.

Inpractice,allecosystemrestorationshouldbeapproachedwithaspatiallyexplicitlandscapeperspectiveinordertoensurethesuitabilityofflows,interactionsandexchangeswithcontiguousecosystems(SER2004).Asystematicunderstandingofalandscapeisessentialtothisendeavor.Therecentworkon'LandscapeEcology'(Foreman&Godron,1986)suggeststhattherearemanywaysofperceivingthelandscapeinplanningprocessesandprovidesusefuldefinitions.But,asobservedbyRackham(1991)therearefashionsinlanduse,whichtendtogeneratefashionsinlandscape.However,astheselandscapesdependonthegrowthoftreesandotherlong‐livedplants,theycannevercatchupwithafashionbeforeitchanges.The'newlandscapesof1970forinstance,arenolongernewin1990,butwearesaddledwiththemfortherestofourlives(Rackhamop.cit.).Thisconsiderationinlandscapeplanningshouldentaila

Page 6: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

resistancetofashionandhigherconcentrationonmeaning.Movingtoachievemeaninginlandscapedesignismovementtowardsart.Howeverthereisthethornyissueofaesthetics.AestheticswaswelldefinedbyEmanuelKantwhenheapplieditinaccordancewithitsclassicalmeaning"thephilosophyofsensuousperception"(anon1966).Butthemeaninghasbeennarrowedintoday’susetodenotesomeelementofbeauty(anon1973a,b).Oftenthelandscapeofone’soriginsetstheyardstickofbeauty.

InAustralia,theancienttraditionssuggestwaystointerpretsuchmeaning.Thelandisanentityandcommunicatesitsstatustothehumanobserver.AnexperiencerecountedbyjournalistMichealLeunig(2008)illustratesthis.Onreturningtotriballandsthathadtobeabandonedforgovernmentuse,aPitjanjarraeldercommented'Ohyoupoorbugger'.Thecommentwasmadethreetimes,onceatabillabong(waterhole)thatwaschokedwithdebris,onceinagrasslandthickwithAcasiathornscrubandoncewhenhecameacrossanumberofKangaroossomeofwhichwereverysick.Whenquestionedaboutthecommentandwhomitwasdirectedat,itbecameevidenthewasspeakingtothelandscape.Whenhewasahunterontheland,hewouldclearanydebrisandrubbishfromthebillabongmakingiteasierforhimtohunt,itwouldalsoallowanimalseasyaccesstothewater,nowitwaschokedandsick:similarly,hewouldburnthegrasslandtostimulategrowthofgrassandfoodplantswhilediscouragingtheestablishmentofwoody,thornscrub,ashewouldtakeouttheslowanimalslongbeforesicknesscouldsetin.Hehadanawarenessoflandscapehealthandwoulduseindicatorspeciesorstatestoidentifyitscondition.

Itisplain;ecosystemsconditionthevaluesofsocietiesthatarefoundwithin.Traditionalsocietiesfindbeautyintheexpressionofnaturalecosystems.Modernsocietywithitsanthropogeniclandscapesreflectthisappreciationofbeautyinthebioticexpressionbutoftenthisconceptofbeautyisrootedinoursocio‐culturalbackgroundsandmay,asoftenasnot,produceunwantedeffectsonthenewlandscape.

EuropeansarrivinginAustraliasetaboutcuttingthenativeforesttoproduce,open,meadows,muchlikethoseinEngland.Despiterecordsoftraditionalcustodianscommenting"Weareworried.Weneedourland.Wewantittostayspotless.Wedon’twanttoseeatreecutdown..."Davis(1983).Inasimilarvein,whenindigenouspeopleandfarmersweretakentotheplantationsofPinusatLake

Page 7: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

EildoninAustraliatheycommentedontheuglinessoftheforestandbemoanedthelackofnativewildlife.HoweverwhenagroupofnewimmigrantsfromnorthernItalyweretakentheretheywereastoundedbythebeautyofthesamelandscape.Thisseemstoconfirmthatlandscapesofonesformativepleasantexperiencesoftensetaestheticstandards.

Thusaestheticlandscapingrequiresextendingourconceptofcommunitytoincludeallthespeciesoflife,ouraestheticinformedbytheecosystemsaroundus.AsLeopoldputit‐‐'Quitthinkingaboutdecentlanduseassolelyaneconomicproblem,butexamineeachquestionintermsofwhatisethicallyandaestheticallyright,aswellaswhatiseconomicallyviable.Athingisrightwhenittendstopreservetheintegrity,stabilityandbeautyofthebioticcommunity.Itiswrongwhenittendsotherwise'(Leopold1949).

Landscapeshavebeendefinedasheterogeneouslandareascomposedofclustersofinteractingecosystemsthatrepeatsinsimilarformthroughout.Landscapedevelopmentorformationisaresultofthreemechanismsoperatingonthelandscapeboundary;specificgeomorphologicprocessestakingplaceoveralongtime,colonizationpatternsoforganismsandlocaldisturbancesofindividualecosystemsoverashortertime(ForemanandGodron1986).InconsideringconservationofecosystemsinSriLanka,twootherdefinitionsareofutility.Oneisa'pleisoclimaticlandscape',containingecosystemsthathavematuredwithouttheinfluenceofman;thesecondis,'anthropomorphiclandscapes',containingecosystemsthathavebeenmodifiedorformedbytheinfluenceofman.

Thisallowsaddressingthelandscapeasadistinctmeasurableunitdefinedbyitsrecognizableandspatiallyrepetitiveclustersofinteractingecosystemswiththeirgeomorphology,disturbanceregimesandhistory.Thesignificantcharacteristicsofalandscapeare:

1)Structure,orthespatialrelationshipsamongthedistinctiveecosystemsor'elements'ofalandscape,forexample,thedistributionofenergy,materialsandspeciesinrelationtothesizes,shapes,numbers,kindsandconfigurationsoftheseecosystems.

Page 8: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

2)Function,ortheinteractionbetweenthesespatialelements,forexample,theflowsofenergy,materialsorspeciesamongthecomponentsofthelandscape.

3)Change,orthealterationintheecologicalmosaicovertimeinrelationtostructureandfunction

AnalogForestryembodiesthesecharacteristicsandseekstodesign,demonstratingknowledgeofstructure,functionandmaturity(change)indesign.Italwayslooksatthematurenaturalecosystemasaguideanddevelopsanideaorconceptofhow;somethingclosetonaturalecosystemcouldbeestablished.Thisdesignmustincludeelementsofproduction,conservationandaesthetics.Itrequiresanunderstandingoftheecosystemsandtheindividualspeciesthatoneisworkingwithatthegreatestdepth,Here,allplanninganddecisionsaremadebeforehandandtheexecutionisaperfunctoryaffair,usuallytakingyearstodevelopintothemanifestationoftheconcept.

LandscapeaestheticsisafundamentaldesigngoalinAnalogForestry,Howeveranalogforestryoftenproducesa‘hybrid’ecosystemcomprisedofbothnativeandexoticspecies.Theactivityofecologicalrestorationhasbeencriticizedonthegroundsthatthisactivityisakintoartforgery.Justasacopiedartworkcouldnotreproducethevalueoftheoriginal,restorednaturecouldnotreproducethevalueofnature.(Elliott1995)

Gunn(1991)suggeststhattheremightbetwotypesofrestorativeactionmaliciousandbenevolentbringingintoquestionthegoalsofthat‘restorative’action.Howeverinbenevolentrestoration,iftherestoredbitofnaturewerearestorativecomponentofalargerecosystem,itwouldhavesomeformofnaturalvalueinitselfbeyonditsinstrumentalvalue.Inthiswaythevalueoftheoriginalbenevolentrestoration—ismorelikeartrestorationthanartforgery(Light2011).

Thoughtheartoflandscapingisanancienthumanendeavor,themimickingofnatureaslandscapingcanbeattributedtoLancelotBrown(1716‐1783)whoseworkwasdescribedasthe"judiciousmanipulationofitscomponentsaddingatreehereoraconcealedheadofwaterthere.Hisartattendedtotheformalpotentialofground,water,andtreesandsogavetoEnglishlandscapeitsidealforms.Thedifficultywasthatlesscapableimitatorsandlesssophisticatedspectatorsdidnotseenatureperfected...theysaw

Page 9: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

simplywhattheytooktobenature"(Wikepedia).Infactcriticismofhisworkfocusedonthefactthatit‘differedverylittlefromcommonfields,socloselyisnaturecopiedinmostofthem(Chambers1772)"

However,themodernplacingofplantsonalandscapespecificallyasartwasinitiatedbyBurleMarx(1909‐1994)whoorganizednativeplantsinaccordancewiththeaestheticprinciplesoftheartisticvanguardofthetime,especiallyCubismandAbstractionism.Hecreatedanewandmoderngrammarforinternationallandscapedesign(Rothner2009).Thus,whenplacingvegetationonalandscapeforrestorativefunctions,inclusionoftheaestheticprinciplesofartbecomesanobviousextension.

Consideringitssignificancetoartinthismanner,itmustbepointedoutthattherestorationofaforestecosystem,canneverattainexactlythesameproportionofspeciesnortheidenticalpatternsofwhatexistedbefore,inthissense,therestorationofaforestisnotdonetocopyexactlythatwhichwaslost,itisdonetorestorethestructureandfunctionsthatwerelost.Theadditionofaestheticsreflectsthedesignerspersonality,withtheconsiderationthatnaturealwaysmovesadisturbedareatomaturethroughecologicalsuccessionwheneverpossible(Ricklefs1999).Theseconsiderationsprovidethefutureplan.Thustherestorationofthetree‐dominatedelementofanylandscapeusingAnalogForestrymustbeseenasadynamicdesignthatunfoldsasitmatures.Eachpredictedexpressionbeingmeaningfultotheecosystemthatitisin,butunique,reflectingtheartofthedesigner.

Forinstance,Thedesignandplantingofamonocultureofevenaged,earlymaturingEucalyptus,toreplacealostnaturalforestdemonstratesaextremelynarrowunderstandingoftheconceptoftheforestthatwaslostanditsrestoration;Itbearslittleresemblancetotheecosystemthatitreplaced.Incontrast,thedesignandplantingofananalogforestrequiresawealthofknowledgeonmanyspeciesandthebroadestapproachtorestoration.Thereismeaningreflectedateachtropiclevel.Asdesigngoals,theformerseeksuniformitywhilethelatterseeksdiversity.

Page 10: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

Fig1NaturalForestwith100%nativespecies

Fig2AnalogForestresponsewith90%exoticspecies

Page 11: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

ButdoesanalogforestryinthewordsofDegas‘makeotherssee’?Harrison(2011)questionstheideafurther,heasks,‘whatistheworkofthework?Sowhatistheworkofananalogforest?’Heoffersthefollowinglist(Table2)

Table2

1. Itisdesignedasanactofcompensationperhapsforanabusedarea.

2. Itisdesignedfromaperspectiveofarchitecture,withoverstory,understoryetc.

3. ItisdesignedfromanunderstandingthatNaturewillself‐complicate,giventheopportunity.

4. Itisdesignedspeculatively,baseduponbestunderstandings.5. Itsdesignreflectsthepersonalaestheticpreferencesofthe

designer.Forinstance,anotherdesigner,withthesameknowledge,mightwellcreateasomewhatdifferentforest,butthathadthesameoutcomesasanotheranalogforestdesigner.

6. Itisdesignedasapieceofeco‐socialwork.Bythisitismeantthat,thespeciesselectedthatinduecourse,self‐complicate,aredesignedtobeofusetosociety,withtheexpressintentionofgivingsocietythetaskofprotecting,enhancingandbenefitingfromthisactofcreativity.

7. Itcreatesanewclassoflaborinsociety.Bythisismeant,apersonwhoissimultaneously,consciouslyeducatedtobebothtoppredatorandtopconserver.(Harrison2002‐2009)

8. Theprincipalactofconservation,theunderstandingbuiltintotheeducationofthenewclassofpeople,isthattheharvestpreservesthesystem(Harrison1986).

9. Therefore,theveryactofmaintainingananalogsystem,beitaquatic,open‐canopyforest,grassandshrublands,oranymixture,includingclosed‐canopyforest,hassimilarpropertiesintheircreationandintheirmaintenance.

10. Thiskindofworkandthiskindofhusbandryprecludesbothmonoculturalactivitiesonthegroundandaboveallthekindofsocietythatcreatesmonocultureofthemind.

InAnalogForestrythedesignerusesthelandscapefeaturesasthecanvasandplacesvariousplantspeciestoobtainproduction,function,textureandcolor.Creativityisencouraged,butthereference,mustbetheoriginalmatureecosystem.AnexamplecanbeseeninanAFdesigninSriLanka

TorestorethelostforestsoftheMirahawatteareaofCentralSriLanka,themodelofthematureforestwastakenfromKnuckles

Page 12: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

mountains(Figure1).Inthismontaneforestallofthevegetationisnative,ithasnotbeendisturbedandisinamaturestate.ThestructureandfunctionsofthisforestwereassumedtobesimilartothatofthelostforestsofMirahawatte,whichisatasimilarelevation.AnAFdesignwasdevelopedandplantingwasbegunin1983.Thedesignreflectedtheneedforfloweringemergentspeciesasseeninthenaturalforest,risingfromaclosedcanopy.Theemergentinturn,taketimetoriseabovethecanopyandthissignalsmaturity.EmergentspeciesareessentialforlargeraptorsandtheLargeForestBee(Apisdorsata)whoseactivitiesarecriticalinmaintainingpollinationoftheforesttrees.Therewasalsotheneedtocreatesplashesofcolorthatwouldlightthecanopy.Inthiscasethedesignerchoseabrightyellowinsteadofthewhiteofthemodel.Thedesigncalledforacanopyofnitrogenfixingtreesasthepoorsoilsofthesiteneededtobebuiltup,buttheirfunctionaskeystonespecieswasalsoadesigncriteria.Manyleguminoustreescouldhavebeenusedinimplementation,butthisdesigncalledforspeciesthatwouldimprovebiodiversity.Therefore,speciesweresortedbytheirabilitytofeedorattractnativefauna.Theresultwastohaveaforegroundtoprovidedark,purplishgreenfoliage,withwhiteflowers,backedbyalightleavedErythrinaplantingwithorangeflowers.AmatrixofTrema(tofeedwildlife)andPersea(fruitforconsumptionandmarket)andArtocarpus(fruitforconsumptionandmarket)wereincludedinthedesign,toprovidediversitytothecanopy,provideincomeandimprovehabitat.ThecanopythuscreatedframestheemergentSchizolobium,whichriseswellabovethecanopyandgivesaburstofgoldenyellowannually(figure2).By2002thisemergenthadattractedapairofForestEagleOwls,neverseenasresidentsinthevalleybefore,confirmingtheoriginaldesigngoalsofaforestedcanopywithemergents.Twenty‐twospeciesofbirdshavebeenrecordedusingthecanopytrees(SenanayakeandJackop.cit.).Eventoday,thedesigncontinuestounfold.Currently,justbelowthecanopyandabouttoriseoutofitarethepalmswhoseeffectsonthedesignwillnotbefeltforanotherfouryearsmore,thusevenaftertwentyyearsthedesignsillunfoldsinthewaypredicted.Asenergydependenttechnologythatlaysclaimtothebasisofdevelopmentandlandmanagementisdesignedonthebasisofmarketableproductivity,theresultisamonotonouslandscape,

Page 13: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

aestheticallypoorandlackingindiversity.Ecologicallyitproducesenergyaddictedproductionsystems.AstheconceptofSustainabilitybecomesanincreasinglyimportantgoalofdevelopment,theemergenceoffarmingandproductionsystemswithincreasingdiversityandenergyindependentproductionsystems,willbecomenecessary.Thelandscapeillustratedbelow(Figure3)showstheconventionalpatternoflanduseintheleftandrightforegroundwhileananalogousdesignisshownintherightbackground.Thebiodiversity,biomassandaestheticdifferencesareobvious.Iftheaestheticdesigninthecurrentworkare‘seen’byothersandifthe‘workofthework’demonstratestheattributesaslistedintable2.TheAnalogForestdesignatMirahawattecouldbeseenasaworkofart.Further,aconstructlikeananalogforest,bydemonstratingthatnatureactsopportunisticallyandwilluseanytoself‐complicate,confirmsthetheorythatnature,givenanopportunitywillmatureintodiverse,sustainablestates.AnalogForestryofferssuchanopportunity.

Fig3.Comparisonoflandscapeaestheticswithconventionallanduse(left)andAnalogForestry(right)

Acknowledgements:

Page 14: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

ThecommentsandconstructivecriticismsofProf.NewtonHarrison,FeizalMansoorandCedricDeSliva,haveaddedmuchclaritytothisdiscussion,theircontributionsaregratefullyacknowledged.

References:

Anon1966OxfordDictionaryofEnglishEtymology,1966.C.T.Onions[Ed],MacMillan,NewYork.

Anon1973ShorterOxfordDictionary,Oxford

Anon1973Webster’sDictionary,NewYork

ChambersR(1772),ADissertationonOrientalGardening,London

ElliotRobert1995"FakingNature,"inEnvironmentalEthics,ed.RobertElliot,Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,pp.76‐88.

Foreman,R.T.T.&Godron,M.1986LandscapeEcology.JohnWiley,NewYork.

HelenMayerHarrisonandNewtonHarrison1986Thelagooncycle:March23throughJune2,1985,HerbertF.JohnsonMuseumofArt,CornellUniversity,Ithaca,NewYork:

HelenMayerHarrisonandNewtonHarrison2007‐2009.GreenhouseBritain.HarrisonStudio417LindenStreet,SantaCruz,CA.HarrisonNewton(2011)pers.communication.

LeopoldAldo1949ASandCountyAlmanac:AndSketchesHereandThere.OxfordUniversityPress

LeWittSol1967:ParagraphsonConceptualArtArtforum.SanFrancisco

KelaartE.1852ProdumusZeylanicae.Colombo.

LightAndrew2011RestorationofArtandRestorationofNature,AestheticsandPhilosophyoftheArtsUniversityofMontana

LeunigMichael2006Thelot:inwords/.Penguinbooks.

Page 15: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,

Rackham,O.1991Landscapeandtheconservationofmeaning.Roy.Soc.Arts.Journ.903‐915.

RicklefsRobertandG.Miller.Ecology1999.Freeman,W.H.&Company.N.Y.

RothnerLarry.2009ANewLookattheMultitalentedManWhoMadeTropicalLandscapinganArt.NewYorkTimes,Jan20.SenanayakeR.andJ.JJack,1998AnalogForestry:AnIntroductionAnalogForestry:AnIntroduction.MonashUniversityPublications.MonashUniv.Clayton,.Vic.Australia.

Senanayake,R.andA.P.Palihawadana1999SomeConsiderationsforSettingPolicyonAgriculturalBiodiversity74‐81.TropicalAgriculturalDevelopment,Tokyo.

SenanayakeR.2004FromknowledgetoactioninthesustainableuseandconservationofBiodiversity:Restorationand‘AnalogForestry’.InSustainableuseandconservationofbiologicaldiversity‐Achallengeforsociety(eds)E,Bayreuth,W,Berendersohn,M,Butros.FedMinEducationandResearchBonn.:87‐90

SER(2004)TheSERInternationalPrimeronEcologicalRestoration.SocietyforEcologicalRestorationInternational.Science&PolicyWorkingGroup(Version2,October,2004)(1)TennentE.1856Ceylon,anaccountoftheIsland,physical,historicalandtopographical.Vols1&2.Longmans,London.

Wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancelot_%22Capability%22_Brown

RanilSenanayake

Chairman,RainforestRescueInternational

Galle

SriLanka

Tel:0912232585

e‐mail:[email protected]

Web:www.rainforestrescueinternational.org

Page 16: Aesthetic Studies Conference, Royal Asiatic Society,