Upload
samuel-lindsey
View
227
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
QG Analysis: Additional Processes
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
QG Analysis
QG Theory
• Basic Idea• Approximations and Validity• QG Equations / Reference
QG Analysis
• Basic Idea• Estimating Vertical Motion
• QG Omega Equation: Basic Form• QG Omega Equation: Relation to Jet Streaks• QG Omega Equation: Q-vector Form
• Estimating System Evolution• QG Height Tendency Equation
• Diabatic and Orographic Processes• Evolution of Low-level Systems• Evolution of Upper-level Systems
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
Review: The BASIC QG Omega Equation
Term A Term B Term C
Term B: Differential Vorticity Advection
• Therefore, in the absence of geostrophic vorticity advection and diabatic processes:
An increase in PVA with height will induce rising motion An increase in NVA with height will induce sinking motion
QG Analysis: Vertical Motion
TVp
RfV
p
f
p
fggg
202
2202
PVA
PVA
PVA
Z-top
Z-400mb
Z-700mb
Z-bottom
ΔZ decreasesΔZ
HydrostaticBalance
Thicknessdecreasesmust occurwith coolingΔZ ΔZ decreases
RisingMotions
AdiabaticCooling
SinkingMotions
AdiabaticWarming
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
Review: The BASIC QG Omega Equation
Term A Term B Term C
Term C: Thermal Advection
• WAA (CAA) leads to local temperature / thickness increases (decreases) • In order to maintain geostrophic flow, ageostrophic flows and mass continuity produce a vertical motion through the layer
• Therefore, in the absence of geostrophic vorticity advection and diabatic processes:
WAA will induce rising motion CAA will induce sinking motion
QG Analysis: Vertical Motion
TVp
RfV
p
f
p
fggg
202
2202
Z-400mb
Z-700mb
Z-bottom
ΔZ increase
SurfaceRose
Z-top
SurfaceFell
Z-400mb
Z-700mb
Z-bottom
Z-top
WAA ΔZ
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
What effect does diabatic heating or cooling have?
Diabatic Heating: Latent heat release due to condensation (Ex: Cumulus convection)
Strong surfaces fluxes (Ex: CAA over the warm Gulf Stream) (Ex: Intense solar heating in the desert)
• Heating always leads to temperature increases → thickness increases• Consider the three-layer model with a deep cumulus cloud
• Again, the maintenance of geostrophic flow requires rising motion through the layer• Identical to the physical response induced by WAA
• Therefore: Diabatic heating induces rising motion
Vertical Motion: Diabatic Heating/Cooling
ΔZ increasesΔZ
SurfaceRose
SurfaceFell
Z-400mb
Z-700mb
Z-bottom
Z-top
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
What effect does diabatic heating or cooling have?
Diabatic Cooling: Evaporation (Ex: Precipitation falling through sub-saturated air)
Radiation (Ex: Large temperature decreases on clear nights)
Strong surface fluxes (Ex: WAA over snow/ice)
• Cooling always leads to temperature decreases → thickness decreases• Consider the three-layer model with evaporational / radiational cooling
• Again, maintenance of geostrophic flow requires sinking motion through the layer• Identical to the physical response induced by CAA
• Therefore: Diabatic cooling aloft induces sinking motion
Vertical Motion: Diabatic Heating/Cooling
ΔZ decreasesΔZSurfaceRose
SurfaceFell Z-400mb
Z-700mb
Z-bottom
Z-top
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
What effect does flow over topography have?
Downslope Motions: Flow away from the Rockies Mountains Flow away from the Appalachian Mountains
• Subsiding air always adiabatically warms• Subsidence leads to temperature increases → thickness increases• Consider the three-layer model with downslope motion at mid-levels
• Again, maintenance of geostrophic flow requires rising motion through the layer• Identical to the physical response induced by WAA and diabatic heating
• Therefore: Downslope flow induces rising motion
Vertical Motion: Topography
ΔZ increasesΔZ
SurfaceRose
SurfaceFell
Z-400mb
Z-700mb
Z-bottom
Z-top
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
What effect does flow over topography have?
Upslope Motions: Flow toward the Rockies Mountains Flow toward the Appalachian Mountains
• Rising air always adiabatically cools• Ascent leads to temperature decreases → thickness decreases• Consider the three-layer model with upslope motion at mid-levels
• Again, maintenance of geostrophic flow requires sinking motion through the layer• Identical to the physical processes induced by CAA and diabatic cooling
• Therefore: Upslope flow induces sinking motion
Vertical Motion: Topography
ΔZ decreasesΔZSurfaceRose
SurfaceFell Z-400mb
Z-700mb
Z-bottom
Z-top
Update: The Modified QG Omega Equation
+ Diabatic + Topographic Forcing Forcing
Note: The text includes a modified equation with only diabatic effects [Section 2.5]
Application Tips:
• Differential vorticity advection and thermal advection are the dominant terms in the majority of situations → weight these terms more
• Diabatic forcing can be important when deep convection or dry/clear air are present
• Topographic forcing is only relevant near large mountain ranges
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
QG Analysis: Vertical Motion
TVp
RfV
p
f
p
fggg
202
2202
VerticalMotion
ThermalAdvection
Differential VorticityAdvection
Application Tips:
Diabatic Forcing
• Use radar → more intense convection → more vertical motion• Use IR satellite → cold cloud tops → deep convection or high clouds?
→ warm cloud tops → shallow convection or low clouds?• Use VIS satellite → clouds or clear air?• Use WV satellite → clear air → dry or moist?
Topographic Forcing
• Topographic maps→ Are the mountains high or low?• Use surface winds → Is flow downslope, upslope, or along-slope?
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
QG Analysis: Vertical Motion
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
Review: The BASIC QG Height Tendency Equation
Term A Term B Term C
Term B: Vorticity Advection
• Positive vorticity advection (PVA) PVA → causes local vorticity increases
• From our relationship between ζg and χ, we know that PVA is equivalent to:
therefore: PVA → or, since: PVA →
Thus, we know that PVA at a single level leads to height falls Using similar logic, NVA at a single level leads to height rises
TVp
Rf
pfVf
p
fg
oggo
2
2
2202
QG Analysis: System Evolution
0
tg
2
0
1p
g
ft
02 p 0 2
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
Review: The BASIC QG Height Tendency Equation
Term A Term B Term C
Term C: Differential Thermal Advection
• Consider an atmosphere with an arbitrary vertical profile of temperature advection
• Thickness changes throughout the profile will result from the type (WAA/CAA) and magnitude of temperature advection though the profile
•Therefore: An increase in WAA advection with height leads to height fallsAn increase in CAA advection with height leads to height
rises
TVp
Rf
pfVf
p
fg
oggo
2
2
2202
QG Analysis: System Evolution
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
Recall:
• Local diabatic heating produces the same response as local WAA
• Likewise local diabatic cooling is equivalent to local CAA
Evaluation:
• Examine / Estimate the vertical profile of diabatic heating / cooling from all available radar / satellite data
System Evolution: Diabatic Heating/Cooling
Regions of Deep Convection
Net Result: Increase in heating with heightHeight Falls
Diabatic Heating maxlocated in upper-levelsdue to condensation
Diabatic cooling maxlocated below cloud base
due to evaporation
Z
Clear Regions
Diabatic Cooling maxlocated in upper-levels
due to radiational cooling
Diabatic heating maxlocated near surfacedue to surface fluxes
Z
Net Result: Increase in cooling with heightHeight Rises
Regions of Shallow Convection
Net Result: Increase in cooling with heightHeight Rises
ZDiabatic Cooling max
located in upper-levelsdue to radiational cooling
Diabatic heating maxlocated in lower-levelsdue to condensation
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
Recall:
• Local downslop flow produces the same response as local WAA
• Likewise local upslope flow is equivalent to local CAA
Evaluation:
• Examine / Estimate the vertical profile of heating due to topographic effects
System Evolution: Topography
Downslope Flow
Net Result: Decrease in heating with height above heating max → height rises
Decrease in heating with height below heating max → height falls
No adiabatic heatingNo topographic effectsabove the mountains
Adiabatic Heatingdue to downslope flow
Z
Upslope Flow
Net Result: Decrease in cooling with height above cooling max → height falls
Decrease in cooling with height below cooling max → height rises
No adiabatic heatingNo topographic effectsabove the mountains
Adiabatic Coolingdue to upslope flow
Z
The Modified QG Height Tendency Equation
+ Diabatic + Topographic Forcing Forcing
Application Tips:
• Differential vorticity advection and thermal advection are the dominant terms in the majority of situations → weight these terms more
• Diabatic forcing can be important when deep convection or dry/clear air are present
• Topographic forcing is only relevant near large mountain ranges
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
HeightTendency
Differential ThermalAdvection
VorticityAdvection
QG Analysis: System Evolution
TVp
Rf
pfVf
p
fg
ogg
2
02
2202
Application Tips:
Diabatic Forcing
• Use radar → more intense convection → more vertical motion• Use IR satellite → cold cloud tops → deep convection or high clouds?
→ warm cloud tops → shallow convection or low clouds?• Use VIS satellite → clouds or clear air?• Use WV satellite → clear air → dry or moist?
Topographic Forcing
• Topographic maps→ Are the mountains high or low?• Use surface winds → Is flow downslope, upslope, or along-slope?
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
QG Analysis: System Evolution
Advanced Synoptic M. D. Eastin
ReferencesBluestein, H. B, 1993: Synoptic-Dynamic Meteorology in Midlatitudes. Volume I: Principles of Kinematics and Dynamics.
Oxford University Press, New York, 431 pp.
Bluestein, H. B, 1993: Synoptic-Dynamic Meteorology in Midlatitudes. Volume II: Observations and Theory of WeatherSystems. Oxford University Press, New York, 594 pp.
Charney, J. G., B. Gilchrist, and F. G. Shuman, 1956: The prediction of general quasi-geostrophic motions. J. Meteor.,13, 489-499.
Durran, D. R., and L. W. Snellman, 1987: The diagnosis of synoptic-scale vertical motionin an operational environment. Weather and Forecasting, 2, 17-31.
Hoskins, B. J., I. Draghici, and H. C. Davis, 1978: A new look at the ω–equation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 104, 31-38.
Hoskins, B. J., and M. A. Pedder, 1980: The diagnosis of middle latitude synoptic development. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor.Soc., 104, 31-38.
Lackmann, G., 2011: Mid-latitude Synoptic Meteorology – Dynamics, Analysis and Forecasting, AMS, 343 pp.
Trenberth, K. E., 1978: On the interpretation of the diagnostic quasi-geostrophic omega equation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 106,131-137.